Steric Complementarity in the Decoding Center Is Important for tRNA Selection by the Ribosome

Accurate tRNA selection by the ribosome is essential for the synthesis of functional proteins. Previous structural studies indicated that the ribosome distinguishes between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs by monitoring the geometry of the codon–anticodon helix in the decoding center using the universally conserved 16S ribosomal RNA bases G530, A1492 and A1493. These bases form hydrogen bonds with the 2′-hydroxyl groups of the codon–anticodon helix, which are expected to be disrupted with a near-cognate codon–anticodon helix. However, a recent structural study showed that G530, A1492 and A1493 form hydrogen bonds in a manner identical with that of both cognate and near-cognate codon–anticodon helices. To understand how the ribosome discriminates between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs, we made 2′-deoxynucleotide and 2′-fluoro substituted mRNAs, which disrupt the hydrogen bonds between the A site codon and G530, A1492 and A1493. Our results show that multiple 2′-deoxynucleotide substitutions in the mRNA substantially inhibit tRNA selection, whereas multiple 2′-fluoro substitutions in the mRNA have only modest effects on tRNA selection. Furthermore, the miscoding antibiotics paromomycin and streptomycin rescue the defects in tRNA selection with the multiple 2′-deoxynucleotide substituted mRNA. These results suggest that steric complementarity in the decoding center is more important than the hydrogen bonds between the A site codon and G530, A1492 and A1493 for tRNA selection.     

Ribosome hijacking: a role for small protein B during trans‐translation

Tight recognition of codon–anticodon pairings by the ribosome ensures the accuracy and fidelity of protein synthesis. In eubacteria, translational surveillance and ribosome rescue are performed by the ‘tmRNA–SmpB’ system (transfer messenger RNA–small protein B). Remarkably, entry and accommodation of aminoacylated‐tmRNA into stalled ribosomes occur without a codon–anticodon interaction but in the presence of SmpB. Here, we show that within a stalled ribosome, SmpB interacts with the three universally conserved bases G530, A1492 and A1493 that form the 30S subunit decoding centre, in which canonical codon–anticodon pairing occurs. The footprints at positions A1492 and A1493 of a small decoding centre, as well as on a set of conserved SmpB amino acids, were identified by nuclear magnetic resonance. Mutants at these residues display the same growth defects as for ΔsmpB strains. The SmpB protein has functional and structural similarities with initiation factor 1, and is proposed to be a functional mimic of the pairing between a codon and an anticodon.     

Real-time evidence for EF-G-induced dynamics of helix 44 in 16S rRNA

The penultimate stem-loop of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), helix 44, plays a central role in ribosome function. Using time-resolved dimethyl sulfate (DMS) probing, we have analyzed time-dependent modifications that occur at specific bases in this helix near the decoding region, resulting from the binding of elongation factor G (EF-G) in various forms. When EF-G-GTP is bound to 70S ribosomes, bases A1492 and A1493 are immediately protected, while other bases in the region show either no change or enhanced modification. When apo-EF-G is bound to 70S ribosomes and GTP is added, substantial transient time-dependent enhancement occurs at bases A1492 and A1493, with somewhat less enhancement occurring at base A1483, all in the first 45 ms. When mRNA and deacylated tRNAs are bound to the 70S ribosome and EF-G-GTP is added, bases A1492 and A1493 again show substantial and continued enhancement, while bases A1408, A1413, and A1418 all show time-dependent protection. These results provide primary, real-time evidence that EF-G induces direct or indirect structural changes in this region as EF-G is bound and as GTP is hydrolyzed.     

Precise alignment of peptidyl tRNA by the decoding center is essential for EF-G-dependent translocation

Translocation is an essential step in the elongation cycle of the protein synthesis that allows for the continual incorporation of new amino acids to the growing polypeptide. Movement of mRNA and tRNAs within the ribosome is catalyzed by EF-G binding and GTP hydrolysis. The 30S subunit decoding center is crucial for the selection of the cognate tRNA. However, it is not clear whether the decoding center participates in translocation. We disrupted the interactions in the decoding center by mutating the universally conserved 16S rRNA bases G530, A1492, and A1493, and the effects of these mutations on translocation were studied. Our results show that point mutation of any of these 16S rRNA bases inhibits EF-G-dependent translocation. Furthermore, the mutant ribosomes showed increased puromycin reactivity in the pretranslocation complexes, indicating that the dynamic equilibrium of the peptidyl tRNA between the classical and hybrid-state configurations is influenced by contacts in the decoding center.     

Interaction of translation initiation factor IF1 with the E. coli ribosomal A site

Initiation Factor 1 (IF1) is required for the initiation of translation in Escherichia coli. However, the precise function of IF1 remains unknown. Current evidence suggests that IF1 is an RNA-binding protein that sits in the A site of the decoding region of 16 S rRNA. IF1 binding to 30 S subunits changes the reactivity of nucleotides in the A site to chemical probes. The N1 position of A1408 is enhanced, while the N1 positions of A1492 and A1493 are protected from reactivity with dimethyl sulfate (DMS). The N1-N2 positions of G530 are also protected from reactivity with kethoxal. Quantitative footprinting experiments show that the dissociation constant for IF1 binding to the 30 S subunit is 0.9 microM and that IF1 also alters the reactivity of a subset of Class III sites that are protected by tRNA, 50 S subunits, or aminoglycoside antibiotics. IF1 enhances the reactivity of the N1 position of A1413, A908, and A909 to DMS and the N1-N2 positions of G1487 to kethoxal. To characterize this RNA-protein interaction, several ribosomal mutants in the decoding region RNA were created, and IF1 binding to wild-type and mutant 30 S subunits was monitored by chemical modification and primer extension with allele-specific primers. The mutations C1407U, A1408G, A1492G, or A1493G disrupt IF1 binding to 30 S subunits, whereas the mutations G530A, U1406A, U1406G, G1491U, U1495A, U1495C, or U1495G had little effect on IF1 binding. Disruption of IF1 binding correlates with the deleterious phenotypic effects of certain mutations. IF1 binding to the A site of the 30 S subunit may modulate subunit association and the fidelity of tRNA selection in the P site through conformational changes in the 16 S rRNA.     

Eukaryotic ribosomal RNA determinants of aminoglycoside resistance and their role in translational fidelity

Recent studies of prokaryotic ribosomes have dramatically increased our knowledge of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) structure, functional centers, and their interactions with antibiotics. However, much less is known about how rRNA function differs between prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes. The core decoding sites are identical in yeast and human 18S rRNAs, suggesting that insights obtained in studies with yeast rRNA mutants can provide information about ribosome function in both species. In this study, we examined the importance of key nucleotides of the 18S rRNA decoding site on ribosome function and aminoglycoside susceptibility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells expressing homogeneous populations of mutant ribosomes. We found that residues G577, A1755, and A1756 (corresponding to Escherichia coli residues G530, A1492, and A1493, respectively) are essential for cell viability. We also found that residue G1645 (A1408 in E. coli) and A1754 (G1491 in E. coli) both make significant and distinct contributions to aminoglycoside resistance. Furthermore, we found that mutations at these residues do not alter the basal level of translational accuracy, but influence both paromomycin-induced misreading of sense codons and readthrough of stop codons. This study represents the most comprehensive mutational analysis of the eukaryotic decoding site to date, and suggests that many fundamental features of decoding site function are conserved between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.     

Transfer RNA shields specific nucleotides in 16S ribosomal RNA from attack by chemical probes

Binding of tRNAPhe to ribosomes shields a set of highly conserved nucleotides in 16S rRNA from attack by a combination of structure-specific chemical probes. The bases can be classified according to whether or not their protection is strictly poly(U)-dependent (G529, G530, U531, A1408, A1492, and A1493) or poly(U)-independent (A532, G693, A794, C795, G926, 2mG966, G1338, A1339, U1381, C1399, C1400, and G1401). A third class (A790, G791, and A909) is shielded by both tRNA and 50S ribosomal subunits. Similar results are obtained when the protecting ligand is tRNAPhe E. Coli, tRNAPhe yeast, tRNAPhe E. Coli lacking its 3' terminal CA, or the 15 nucleotide anticodon stem-loop fragment of tRNAPhe yeast. Implications for structural correlates of the classic ribosomal A- and P-sites and for the possible involvement of 16S rRNA in translational proofreading are discussed.     

Universally conserved interactions between the ribosome and the anticodon stem-loop of A site tRNA important for translocation

The iterative movement of the tRNA-mRNA complex through the ribosome is a hallmark of the elongation phase of protein synthesis. We used synthetic anticodon stem-loop analogs (ASL) of tRNA(Phe) to systematically identify ribose 2'-hydroxyl groups that are essential for binding and translocation from the ribosomal A site. Our results show that 2'-hydroxyl groups at positions 33, 35, and 36 in the A site ASL are important for translocation. Consistent with the view that the molecular basis of translocation may be similar in all organisms, the 2'-hydroxyl groups at positions 35 and 36 in the ASL interact with universally conserved bases G530 and A1493, respectively, in 16S rRNA. Furthermore, these interactions are also essential for the decoding process, indicating a functional relationship between decoding and translocation.     

Binding of tRNA to the ribosomal A and P sites protects two distinct sets of nucleotides in 16 S rRNA

Transfer RNA protects a characteristic set of bases in 16 S rRNA from chemical probes when it binds to ribosomes. We used several criteria, based on construction of well-characterized in vitro ribosome-tRNA complexes, to assign these proteins to A or P-site binding. All of these approaches lead to similar conclusions. In the A site, tRNA caused protection of G529, G530, A1492 and A1493 (strongly), and A1408 and G1494 (weakly). In the P site, the protected bases are G693, A794, C795, G926 and G1401 (strong), and A532, G966, G1338 and G1339 (weak). In contrast to what is observed for 23 S rRNA, blocking the release of EF-Tu.GDP from the ribosome by kirromycin has no detectable effect on the protection of bases in 16 S rRNA.     

Two conformational states in the crystal structure of the Homo sapiens cytoplasmic ribosomal decoding A site

The decoding A site of the small ribosomal subunit is an RNA molecular switch, which monitors codon–anticodon interactions to guarantee translation fidelity. We have solved the crystal structure of an RNA fragment containing two Homo sapiens cytoplasmic A sites. Each of the two A sites presents a different conformational state. In one state, adenines A1492 and A1493 are fully bulged-out with C1409 forming a wobble-like pair to A1491. In the second state, adenines A1492 and A1493 form non-Watson–Crick pairs with C1409 and G1408, respectively while A1491 bulges out. The first state of the eukaryotic A site is, thus, basically the same as in the bacterial A site with bulging A1492 and A1493. It is the state used for recognition of the codon/anticodon complex. On the contrary, the second state of the H.sapiens cytoplasmic A site is drastically different from any of those observed for the bacterial A site without bulging A1492 and A1493.     

Crystal structure of paromomycin docked into the eubacterial ribosomal decoding A site

BACKGROUND: Aminoglycoside antibiotics interfere with translation in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria by binding to the tRNA decoding A site of the 16S ribosomal RNA. RESULTS: Crystals of complexes between oligoribonucleotides incorporating the sequence of the ribosomal A site of Escherichia coli and the aminoglycoside paromomycin have been solved at 2.5 A resolution. Each RNA fragment contains two A sites inserted between Watson-Crick pairs. The paromomycin molecules interact in an enlarged deep groove created by two bulging and one unpaired adenines. In both sites, hydroxyl and ammonium side chains of the antibiotic form 13 direct hydrogen bonds to bases and backbone atoms of the A site. In the best-defined site, 8 water molecules mediate 12 other hydrogen bonds between the RNA and the antibiotics. Ring I of paromomycin stacks over base G1491 and forms pseudo-Watson-Crick contacts with A1408. Both the hydroxyl group and one ammonium group of ring II form direct and water-mediated hydrogen bonds to the U1495oU1406 pair. The bulging conformation of the two adenines A1492 and A1493 is stabilized by hydrogen bonds between phosphate oxygens and atoms of rings I and II. The hydrophilic sites of the bulging A1492 and A1493 contact the shallow groove of G=C pairs in a symmetrical complex. CONCLUSIONS: Water molecules participate in the binding specificity by exploiting the antibiotic hydration shell and the typical RNA water hydration patterns. The observed contacts rationalize the protection, mutation, and resistance data. The crystal packing mimics the intermolecular contacts induced by aminoglycoside binding in the ribosome.     

The role of SmpB and the ribosomal decoding center in licensing tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes

In bacteria, stalled ribosomes are recycled by a hybrid transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). Like tRNA, tmRNA is aminoacylated with alanine and is delivered to the ribosome by EF-Tu, where it reacts with the growing polypeptide chain. tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes poses a challenge to our understanding of ribosome function because it occurs in the absence of a codon-anticodon interaction. Instead, tmRNA entry is licensed by the binding of its protein partner, SmpB, to the ribosomal decoding center. We analyzed a series of SmpB mutants and found that its C-terminal tail is essential for tmRNA accommodation but not for EF-Tu activation. We obtained evidence that the tail likely functions as a helix on the ribosome to promote accommodation and identified key residues in the tail essential for this step. In addition, our mutational analysis points to a role for the conserved K(131)GKK tail residues in trans-translation after peptidyl transfer to tmRNA, presumably EF-G-mediated translocation or translation of the tmRNA template. Surprisingly, analysis of A1492, A1493, and G530 mutants reveals that while these ribosomal nucleotides are essential for normal tRNA selection, they play little to no role in peptidyl transfer to tmRNA. These studies clarify how SmpB interacts with the ribosomal decoding center to license tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes.     

An antibiotic-binding motif of an RNA fragment derived from the A-site-related region of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA.

A small RNA derived from the decoding region of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA can bind to antibiotics of aminoglycosides (neomycin and paromomycin) that act on the small ribosomal subunit [Purohit,P. and Stern,S. (1994) Nature, 370, 659-662]. In the present study, the P-site subdomain was removed from this decoding region RNA to construct a 27mer RNA (designated as ASR-27), which includes the A-site-related region (positions 1402-1412 and 1488-1497) of 16S rRNA. Footprint experiments with dimethyl sulfate as a chemical probe indicated that the ASR-27 RNA can interact with the neomycin family in the same manner as the decoding region RNA. A mutagenesis analysis of the ASR-27 RNA revealed that paromomycin binding of ASR-27 involves the C1407.G1494 and C1409-G1491 base pairs, and the internal loop comprising A1408 and the nucleotides in positions 1492-1493, located between the two C.G base pairs. In addition, a G or U in position 1495, and base pairing between positions 1405 and 1496 are also involved. These structural features were found in a viral RNA element, the Rev-binding site of human immunodeficiency virus type-1, which may explain why neomycin can bind to this viral RNA.     

Understanding discrimination by the ribosome: stability testing and groove measurement of codon-anticodon pairs

The ribosome must discriminate between correct and incorrect tRNAs with sufficient speed and accuracy to sustain an adequate rate of cell growth. Here, we report the results of explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations, which address the mechanism of discrimination by the ribosome. The universally conserved 16S rRNA base A1493 and the kink in mRNA between A and P sites amplify differences in stability between cognate and near-cognate codon-anticodon pairs. Destabilization by the mRNA kink also provides a geometric explanation for the higher error rates observed for mismatches in the first codon position relative to mismatches in the second codon position. For more stable near-cognates, the repositioning of the universally conserved bases A1492 and G530 results in increased solvent exposure and an uncompensated loss of hydrogen bonds, preventing correct codon-anticodon-ribosome interactions from forming.     

Contribution of 16S rRNA nucleotides forming the 30S subunit A and P sites to translation in Escherichia coli

Many contacts between the ribosome and its principal substrates, tRNA and mRNA, involve universally conserved rRNA nucleotides, implying their functional importance in translation. Here, we measure the in vivo translation activity conferred by substitution of each 16S rRNA base believed to contribute to the A or P site. We find that the 30S P site is generally more tolerant of mutation than the 30S A site. In the A site, A1493C or any substitution of G530 or A1492 results in complete loss of translation activity, while A1493U and A1493G decrease translation activity by >20-fold. Among the P-site nucleotides, A1339 is most critical; any mutation of A1339 confers a >18-fold decrease in translation activity. Regarding all other P-site bases, ribosomes harboring at least one substitution retain considerable activity, >10% that of control ribosomes. Moreover, several sets of multiple substitutions within the 30S P site fail to inactivate the ribosome. The robust nature of the 30S P site indicates that its interaction with the codon-anticodon helix is less stringent than that of the 30S A site. In addition, we show that G1338A suppresses phenotypes conferred by m(2)G966A and several multiple P-site substitutions, suggesting that adenine at position 1338 can stabilize tRNA interaction in the P site.     

Crystal structure of geneticin bound to a bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA A site oligonucleotide

Aminoglycosides are antibacterial molecules that decrease translation accuracy by binding to the decoding aminoacyl-tRNA site (A site) on 16S ribosomal RNA. We have solved the crystal structure of an RNA fragment containing the A site bound to geneticin at 2.40A resolution. Geneticin, also known as G418, is a gentamicin-related aminoglycoside: it contains three rings that are functionalized by hydroxyl, ammonium and methyl groups. The detailed comparison of the distinctive behaviour of geneticin (binding to pro- and eukaryotic A sites) with the crystallographic, biochemical and microbiological results obtained so far for aminoglycoside-A site complexes offers new insights on the system. The two sugar rings constituting the neamine part common to most of the aminoglycosides bind to the A site, as already observed in the crystal structures solved previously with paromomycin and tobramycin. The essential hydrogen bonds involving ring I (to A1408) and ring II (to the phosphate oxygen atoms of the bulged adenine bases 1492 and 1493 and to G1494) are conserved and additional contacts are observed from ring III (to phosphate oxygen atoms of G1405 and U1406). The present work illustrates a molecular basis of the range in sensitiveness exhibited by geneticin towards common point A site mutations associated to resistance phenotypes. In addition, analysis and comparisons of the structures cast light on the role played by the conserved U1406.U1495 pair in the recognition of the A site by aminoglycosides.     

Energetics of codon-anticodon recognition on the small ribosomal subunit

Recent crystal structures of the small ribosomal subunit have made it possible to examine the detailed energetics of codon recognition on the ribosome by computational methods. The binding of cognate and near-cognate anticodon stem loops to the ribosome decoding center, with mRNA containing the Phe UUU and UUC codons, are analyzed here using explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations together with the linear interaction energy (LIE) method. The calculated binding free energies are in excellent agreement with experimental binding constants and reproduce the relative effects of mismatches in the first and second codon position versus a mismatch at the wobble position. The simulations further predict that the Leu2 anticodon stem loop is about 10 times more stable than the Ser stem loop in complex with the Phe UUU codon. It is also found that the ribosome significantly enhances the intrinsic stability differences of codon-anticodon complexes in aqueous solution. Structural analysis of the simulations confirms the previously suggested importance of the universally conserved nucleotides A1492, A1493, and G530 in the decoding process.     

Stochastic Gating and Drug-Ribosome Interactions

Gentamicin is a potent antibiotic that is used in combination therapy for inhalation anthrax disease. The drug is also often used in therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus. Gentamicin works by flipping a conformational switch on the ribosome, disrupting the reading head (i.e., 16S ribosomal decoding bases 1492-1493) used for decoding messenger RNA. We use explicit solvent all-atom molecular simulation to study the thermodynamics of the ribosomal decoding site and its interaction with gentamicin. The replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations used an aggregate sampling of 15 μs when summed over all replicas, allowing us to explicitly calculate the free-energy landscape, including a rigorous treatment of enthalpic and entropic effects. Here, we show that the decoding bases flip on a timescale faster than that of gentamicin binding, supporting a stochastic gating mechanism for antibiotic binding, rather than an induced-fit model where the bases only flip in the presence of a ligand. The study also allows us to explore the nonspecific binding landscape near the binding site and reveals that, rather than a two-state bound/unbound scenario, drug dissociation entails shuttling between many metastable local minima in the free-energy landscape. Special care is dedicated to validation of the obtained results, both by direct comparison to experiment and by estimation of simulation convergence.     

Structures of modified eEF2 80S ribosome complexes reveal the role of GTP hydrolysis in translocation

On the basis of kinetic data on ribosome protein synthesis, the mechanical energy for translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex is thought to be provided by GTP hydrolysis of an elongation factor (eEF2 in eukaryotes, EF-G in bacteria). We have obtained cryo-EM reconstructions of eukaryotic ribosomes complexed with ADP-ribosylated eEF2 (ADPR-eEF2), before and after GTP hydrolysis, providing a structural basis for analyzing the GTPase-coupled mechanism of translocation. Using the ADP-ribosyl group as a distinct marker, we observe conformational changes of ADPR-eEF2 that are due strictly to GTP hydrolysis. These movements are likely representative of native eEF2 motions in a physiological context and are sufficient to uncouple the mRNA-tRNA complex from two universally conserved bases in the ribosomal decoding center (A1492 and A1493 in Escherichia coli) during translocation. Interpretation of these data provides a detailed two-step model of translocation that begins with the eEF2/EF-G binding-induced ratcheting motion of the small ribosomal subunit. GTP hydrolysis then uncouples the mRNA-tRNA complex from the decoding center so translocation of the mRNA-tRNA moiety may be completed by a head rotation of the small subunit.     

Crystal structures of complexes between aminoglycosides and decoding A site oligonucleotides: role of the number of rings and positive charges in the specific binding leading to miscoding

The crystal structures of six complexes between aminoglycoside antibiotics (neamine, gentamicin C1A, kanamycin A, ribostamycin, lividomycin A and neomycin B) and oligonucleotides containing the decoding A site of bacterial ribosomes are reported at resolutions between 2.2 and 3.0 Å. Although the number of contacts between the RNA and the aminoglycosides varies between 20 and 31, up to eight direct hydrogen bonds between rings I and II of the neamine moiety are conserved in the observed complexes. The puckered sugar ring I is inserted into the A site helix by stacking against G1491 and forms a pseudo base pair with two H-bonds to the Watson–Crick sites of the universally conserved A1408. This central interaction helps to maintain A1492 and A1493 in a bulged-out conformation. All these structures of the minimal A site RNA complexed to various aminoglycosides display crystal packings with intermolecular contacts between the bulging A1492 and A1493 and the shallow/minor groove of Watson–Crick pairs in a neighbouring helix. In one crystal, one empty A site is observed. In two crystals, two aminoglycosides are bound to the same A site with one bound specifically and the other bound in various ways in the deep/major groove at the edge of the A sites.