Understanding the Sequence Specificity of tRNA Binding to Elongation Factor Tu using tRNA Mutagenesis

Measuring the binding affinities of 42 single-base-pair mutants in the acceptor and TΨC stems of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNA^Phe to Thermus thermophilus elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) revealed that much of the specificity for tRNA occurs at the 49-65, 50-64, and 51-63 base pairs. Introducing the same mutations at the three positions into Escherichia coli tRNA_CAG^Leu resulted in similar changes in binding affinity. Swapping the three pairs from several E. coli tRNAs into yeast tRNA^Phe resulted in chimeras with EF-Tu binding affinities similar to those for the donor tRNA. Finally, analysis of double- and triple-base-pair mutants of tRNA^Phe showed that the thermodynamic contributions at the three sites are additive, permitting reasonably accurate prediction of the EF-Tu binding affinity for all E. coli tRNAs. Thus, it appears that the thermodynamic contributions of three base pairs in the TΨC stem primarily account for tRNA binding specificity to EF-Tu.     

Uniform affinity-tuning of N-methyl-aminoacyl-tRNAs to EF-Tu enhances their multiple incorporation

In ribosomal translation, the accommodation of aminoacyl-tRNAs into the ribosome is mediated by elongation factor thermo unstable (EF-Tu). The structures of proteinogenic aminoacyl-tRNAs (pAA-tRNAs) are fine-tuned to have uniform binding affinities to EF-Tu in order that all proteinogenic amino acids can be incorporated into the nascent peptide chain with similar efficiencies. Although genetic code reprogramming has enabled the incorporation of non-proteinogenic amino acids (npAAs) into the nascent peptide chain, the incorporation of some npAAs, such as N-methyl-amino acids (^MeAAs), is less efficient, especially when ^MeAAs frequently and/or consecutively appear in a peptide sequence. Such poor incorporation efficiencies can be attributed to inadequate affinities of ^MeAA-tRNAs to EF-Tu. Taking advantage of flexizymes, here we have experimentally verified that the affinities of ^MeAA-tRNAs to EF-Tu are indeed weaker than those of pAA-tRNAs. Since the T-stem of tRNA plays a major role in interacting with EF-Tu, we have engineered the T-stem sequence to tune the affinity of ^MeAA-tRNAs to EF-Tu. The uniform affinity-tuning of the individual pairs has successfully enhanced the incorporation of ^MeAAs, achieving the incorporation of nine distinct ^MeAAs into both linear and thioether-macrocyclic peptide scaffolds.     

The ternary complex of aminoacylated tRNA and EF-Tu-GTP. Recognition of a bond and a fold

The refined crystal structure of the ternary complex of yeast Phe-tRNA^Phe, Thermus aquaticus elongation factor EF-Tu and the non-hydrolyzable GTP analog, GDPNP, revelas many details of the EF-Tu recognition of aminoacylated tRNA (aa-tRNA). EF-Tu-GTP recognizes the aminoacyl bond and one side of the backbone fold of the acceptor helix and has a high affinity for all ordinary elongator aa-tRNAs by binding to this aa-tRNA motif. Yet, the binding of deacylated tRNA, initiator tRNA, and selenocysteine-specific tRNA (tRNA^Sec) is effectively discriminated against. Subtle rearrangements of the binding pocket may occur to optimize the fit to any side chain of the aminoacyl group and interactions with EF-Tu stabilize the 3′-aminoacyl isomer of aa-tRNA. A general complementarity is observed in the location of the binding sites in tRNA for synthetases and for EF-Tu. The complex formation is highly specific for the GTP-bound conformation of EF-Tu, which can explain the effects of various mutants.     

Structural elements defining elongation factor Tu mediated suppression of codon ambiguity

In most prokaryotes Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln are formed by amidation of aspartate and glutamate mischarged onto tRNA^Asn and tRNA^Gln, respectively. Coexistence in the organism of mischarged Asp-tRNA^Asn and Glu-tRNA^Gln and the homologous Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln does not, however, lead to erroneous incorporation of Asp and Glu into proteins, since EF-Tu discriminates the misacylated tRNAs from the correctly charged ones. This property contrasts with the canonical function of EF-Tu, which is to non-specifically bind the homologous aa-tRNAs, as well as heterologous species formed in vitro by aminoacylation of non-cognate tRNAs. In Thermus thermophilus that forms the Asp-tRNA^Asn intermediate by the indirect pathway of tRNA asparaginylation, EF-Tu must discriminate the mischarged aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNA). We show that two base pairs in the tRNA T-arm and a single residue in the amino acid binding pocket of EF-Tu promote discrimination of Asp-tRNA^Asn from Asn-tRNA^Asn and Asp-tRNA^Asp by the protein. Our analysis suggests that these structural elements might also contribute to rejection of other mischarged aa-tRNAs formed in vivo that are not involved in peptide elongation. Additionally, these structural features might be involved in maintaining a delicate balance of weak and strong binding affinities between EF-Tu and the amino acid and tRNA moieties of other elongator aa-tRNAs.     

Dynamics of Recognition between tRNA and elongation factor Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) binds to all standard aminoacyl transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) and transports them to the ribosome while protecting the ester linkage between the tRNA and its cognate amino acid. We use molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the dynamics of the EF-Tu·guanosine 5′-triphosphate·aa-tRNA^Cys complex and the roles played by Mg²⁺ ions and modified nucleosides on the free energy of protein·RNA binding. Individual modified nucleosides have pronounced effects on the structural dynamics of tRNA and the EF-Tu·Cys-tRNA^Cys interface. Combined energetic and evolutionary analyses identify the coevolution of residues in EF-Tu and aa-tRNAs at the binding interface. Highly conserved EF-Tu residues are responsible for both attracting aa-tRNAs as well as providing nearby nonbonded repulsive energies that help fine-tune molecular attraction at the binding interface. In addition to the 3′ CCA end, highly conserved tRNA nucleotides G1, G52, G53, and U54 contribute significantly to EF-Tu binding energies. Modification of U54 to thymine affects the structure of the tRNA common loop resulting in a change in binding interface contacts. In addition, other nucleotides, conserved within certain tRNA specificities, may be responsible for tuning aa-tRNA binding to EF-Tu. The trend in EF-Tu·Cys-tRNA^Cys binding energies observed as the result of mutating the tRNA agrees with experimental observation. We also predict variations in binding free energies upon misacylation of tRNA^Cys with d-cysteine or O-phosphoserine and upon changing the protonation state of l-cysteine. Principal components analysis in each case reveals changes in the communication network across the protein·tRNA interface and is the basis for the entropy calculations.     

Ternary complex between elongation factor Tu•GTP and Phe-tRNA

The effect of aminoacylation and ternary complex formation with elongation factor Tu•GTP on the tertiary structure of yeast tRNA^Phe was examined by ¹H-NMR spectroscopy. Esterification of phenylalanine to tRNA^Phe does not lead to changes with respect to the secondary and tertiary base pair interactions of tRNA. Complex formation of Phe-tRNA^Phe with elongation factor Tu•GTP results in a broadening of all imino proton resonances of the tRNA. The chemical shifts of several NH proton resonances are slightly changed as compared to free tRNA, indicating a minor conformational rearrangement of Phe-tRNA^Phe upon binding to elongation factor Tu•GTP. All NH proton resonances corresponding to the secondary and tertiary base pairs of tRNA, except those arising from the first three base pairs in the aminoacyl stem, are detectable in the Phe-tRNA^Phe•elongation factor Tu•GTP ternary complex. Thus, although the interactions between elongation factor Tu and tRNA accelerate the rate of NH proton exchange in the aminoacyl stem-region, the Phe-tRNA^Phe preserves its typical L-shaped tertiary structure in the complex. At high (> 10⁻⁴ M) ligand concentrations a complex between tRNA^Phe and elongation factor Tu•GDP can be detected on the NMR time-scale. Formation of this complex is inhibited by the presence of any RNA not related to the tRNA structure. Using the known tertiary structures of yeast tRNA^Phe and Thermus thermophilus elongation factor Tu in its active, GTP form, a model of the ternary complex was constructed.     

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Framework of Selenocysteyl-tRNASec Recognition by Elongation Factor SelB

SelB is a specialized translation elongation factor that delivers selenocysteyl-tRNA^Sec (Sec-tRNA^Sec) to the ribosome. Here we show that Sec-tRNA^Sec binds to SelB·GTP with an extraordinary high affinity (K_d = 0.2 pm). The tight binding is driven enthalpically and involves the net formation of four ion pairs, three of which may involve the Sec residue. The dissociation of tRNA from the ternary complex SelB·GTP·Sec-tRNA^Sec is very slow (0.3 h⁻¹), and GTP hydrolysis accelerates the release of Sec-tRNA^Sec by more than a million-fold (to 240 s⁻¹). The affinities of Sec-tRNA^Sec to SelB in the GDP or apoforms, or Ser-tRNA^Sec and tRNA^Sec to SelB in any form, are similar (K_d = 0.5 μm). Thermodynamic coupling in binding of Sec-tRNA^Sec and GTP to SelB ensures at the same time the specificity of Sec- versus Ser-tRNA^Sec selection and rapid release of Sec-tRNA^Sec from SelB after GTP cleavage on the ribosome. SelB provides an example for the evolution of a highly specialized protein-RNA complex toward recognition of unique set of identity elements. The mode of tRNA recognition by SelB is reminiscent of another specialized factor, eIF2, rather than of EF-Tu, the common delivery factor for all other aminoacyl-tRNAs, in line with a common evolutionary ancestry of SelB and eIF2.     

Temperature dependence of the aminoacylation of tRNA by Bacillus stearothermophilus aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Valine specific transfer RNA (tRNA^Val) was isolated from Bacillus stearothermophilus and Escherichia coli by chromatography on benzoylated DEAE–cellulose (BD–cellulose). Likewise isoleucine specific transfer RNA (tRNA^Ile) was isolated from B. stearothermophilus and from Mycoplasma sp. Kid. The thermal denaturation profiles (melting curves) of the two tRNA^Val species in the presence of Mg^{+ +} were nearly identical. However, the T_m for the Kid tRNA^Ile was about 10°C lower than that for the B. stearothermophilus tRNA^Ile. A nuclease and tRNA-free aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (AA-tRNA synthetase) preparation from B. stearothermophilus was able to function efficiently at temperatures up to 80°C in the aminoacylation of all four tRNA species. Determination of the amino acid-acceptor activity of each tRNA species as a function of temperature of the aminoacylation reaction showed in each case a strong correlation between the loss of acceptor activity and the thermal denaturation profile of the tRNA. Evidence is presented that the loss in acceptor activity is most likely due to a change in structure of the tRNA as opposed to denaturation of the enzyme. These results further support the idea that correct secondary and/or tertiary structure must be maintained for tRNA to be active as a substrate for the AA-tRNA synthetase.     

Recognition of the universally conserved 3'-CCA end of tRNA by elongation factor EF-Tu.

Escherichia coli tRNA(Val) with pyrimidine substitutions for the universally conserved 3'-terminal adenine can be readily aminoacylated. It cannot, however, transfer valine into polypeptides. Conversely, despite being a poor substrate for valyl-tRNA synthetase, tRNA(Val) with a 3'-terminal guanine is active in in vitro polypeptide synthesis. To better understand the function of the 3'-CCA sequence of tRNA in protein synthesis, the effects of systematically varying all three bases on formation of the Val-tRNA(Val):EF-Tu:GTP ternary complex were investigated. Substitutions at C74 and C75 have no significant effect, but replacing A76 with pyrimidines decreases the affinity of valyl-tRNA(Val) for EF-Tu:GTP, thus explaining the inability of these tRNA(Val) variants to function in polypeptide synthesis. Valyl-tRNA(Val) terminating in 3'-guanine is readily recognized by EF-TU:GTP. Dissociation constants of the EF-Tu:GTP ternary complexes with valine tRNAs having nucleotide substitutions at the 3' end increase in the order adenine < guanine < uracil; EF-Tu has very little affinity for tRNA terminating in 3' cytosine. Similar observations were made in studies of the interaction of 3' end mutants of E. coli tRNA(Ala) and tRNA(Phe) with EF-Tu:GTP. These results indicate that EF-Tu:GTP preferentially recognizes purines and discriminates against pyrimidines, especially cytosine, at the 3' end of aminoacyl-tRNAs.     

Terminal oxidation-reduction of N-acetyl-phenylalanyl-tRNA blocks initiation complex formation with Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits

Terminally oxidized-reduced tRNA^Phe of yeast, exclusively acylated at the 2′-hydroxyl of the 3′-terminal ribose of the tRNA, is a useful model for investigating the stereospecificity of AA-tRNA in protein synthesis. In this work, the ability of N-acetyl-Phe-tRNA^ox-red to form an initiation complex with Escherichiacoli 30S ribosomal subunits was investigated. Thirty per cent of added control N-acetyl-Phe-tRNA was bound in a reaction dependent on initiation factors, GTP, and poly U, but no binding of the oxidized-reduced analog could be detected. These results imply that initiation complex formation may be specific for the 3′-ester of initiator tRNA.     

Escherichia coli formylmethionine tRNA: methylation of specific guanine and adenine residues catalyzed by HeLa cells tRNA methylases and the effect of these methylations on its biological properties

Purified HeLa cell tRNA methylases have been used for site-specific methylations of Escherichia coli formylmethionine transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA^fMet). Guanine-N²-methylase catalyzed the methylation of a specific guanine residue (G₂₇) and adenine-1-methylase that of a specific adenine residue (A₅₉). The combined action of both of these enzymes leads to a total incorporation of two methyl groups and results in the methylation of both G₂₇ and A₅₉.The effect of introducing additional methyl groups on the function of tRNA has been studied by a comparison in vitro of the biological properties of tRNA^fMet and enzymically methylated tRNA^fMet. It was found that none of the following properties of E. coli tRNA^fMet are altered to any significant extent by methylation: (a) rate, extent, and specificity of aminoacylation, (b) ability of methionyl-tRNA to be enzymically formylated, and (c) ability of formylmethionyl-tRNA to initiate protein synthesis in cell-free extracts of E. coli in the presence of f2 RNA as messenger. Also, the temperature versus absorbance profile of the doubly methylated tRNA^fmet was virtually identical to that of the E. coli tRNA^fMet, and enzymically methylated tRNA^fmet resembled tRNA^fMet in that both were resistant to deacylation by E. coli, N-acylaminoacyl-tRNA hydrolase.     

Interaction of a selenocysteine-incorporating tRNA with elongation factor Tu from E.coli.

Selenocysteine-incorporating tRNA(Sec)(UCA), the product of selC, was isolated from E.coli and aminoacylated with serine. The equilibrium dissociation constant for the interaction of Ser-tRNA(Sec)(UCA) with elongation factor Tu.GTP was determined to be 5.0 +/- 2.5 x 10(-8) M. Compared with the dissociation constants of the two elongator Ser-tRNA(Ser) species (Kd = 7 x 10(-10) M), the selenocysteine-incorporating UGA suppressor tRNA has an almost hundred fold weaker affinity for EF-Tu.GTP. This suggests a mechanism by which the Ser-tRNA(Sec) is prevented in recognition of UGA codons. This tRNA is not bound to EF-Tu.GTP and is converted to selenocysteinyl-tRNA(Sec). We also demonstrate the lack of an efficient interaction of Sec-tRNA(Sec)(UCA) with EF-Tu.GTP. The results of this work are in support of a mechanism by which the selenocysteine incorporation at UGA nonsense codons is mediated by an elongation factor other than EF-Tu.GTP.     

Directed mutagenesis identifies amino acid residues involved in elongation factor Tu binding to yeast Phe-tRNAPhe

The co-crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus elongation factor Tu.guanosine 5'- [beta,gamma-imido]triphosphate (EF-Tu.GDPNP) bound to yeast Phe-tRNA(Phe) reveals that EF-Tu interacts with the tRNA body primarily through contacts with the phosphodiester backbone. Twenty amino acids in the tRNA binding cleft of Thermus Thermophilus EF-Tu were each mutated to structurally conservative alternatives and the affinities of the mutant proteins to yeast Phe-tRNA(Phe) determined. Eleven of the 20 mutations reduced the binding affinity from fourfold to >100-fold, while the remaining ten had no effect. The thermodynamically important residues were spread over the entire tRNA binding interface, but were concentrated in the region which contacts the tRNA T-stem. Most of the data could be reconciled by considering the crystal structures of both free EF-Tu.GTP and the ternary complex and allowing for small (1.0 A) movements in the amino acid side-chains. Thus, despite the non-physiological crystallization conditions and crystal lattice interactions, the crystal structures reflect the biochemically relevant interaction in solution.     

Crystal structure of glutamyl-queuosine tRNAAsp synthetase complexed with L-glutamate: structural elements mediating tRNA-independent activation of glutamate and glutamylation of tRNAAsp anticodon

Glutamyl-queuosine tRNA^Asp synthetase (Glu-Q-RS) from Escherichia coli is a paralog of the catalytic core of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) that catalyzes glutamylation of queuosine in the wobble position of tRNA^Asp. Despite important structural similarities, Glu-Q-RS and GluRS diverge strongly by their functional properties. The only feature common to both enzymes consists in the activation of Glu to form Glu-AMP, the intermediate of transfer RNA (tRNA) aminoacylation. However, both enzymes differ by the mechanism of selection of the cognate amino acid and by the mechanism of its activation. Whereas GluRS selects l-Glu and activates it only in the presence of the cognate tRNA^Glu, Glu-Q-RS forms Glu-AMP in the absence of tRNA. Moreover, while GluRS transfers the activated Glu to the 3′ accepting end of the cognate tRNA^Glu, Glu-Q-RS transfers the activated Glu to Q34 located in the anticodon loop of the noncognate tRNA^Asp. In order to gain insight into the structural elements leading to distinct mechanisms of amino acid activation, we solved the three-dimensional structure of Glu-Q-RS complexed to Glu and compared it to the structure of the GluRS·Glu complex. Comparison of the catalytic site of Glu-Q-RS with that of GluRS, combined with binding experiments of amino acids, shows that a restricted number of residues determine distinct catalytic properties of amino acid recognition and activation by the two enzymes. Furthermore, to explore the structural basis of the distinct aminoacylation properties of the two enzymes and to understand why Glu-Q-RS glutamylates only tRNA^Asp among the tRNAs possessing queuosine in position 34, we performed a tRNA mutational analysis to search for the elements of tRNA^Asp that determine recognition by Glu-Q-RS. The analyses made on tRNA^Asp and tRNA^Asn show that the presence of a C in position 38 is crucial for glutamylation of Q34. The results are discussed in the context of the evolution and adaptation of the tRNA glutamylation system.     

Coevolution of Specificity Determinants in Eukaryotic Glutamyl- and Glutaminyl-tRNA Synthetases

The glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) enzyme, which pairs glutamine with tRNA^Gln for protein synthesis, evolved by gene duplication in early eukaryotes from a nondiscriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) that aminoacylates both tRNA^Gln and tRNA^Glu with glutamate. This ancient GluRS also separately differentiated to exclude tRNA^Gln as a substrate, and the resulting discriminating GluRS and GlnRS further acquired additional protein domains assisting function in cis (the GlnRS N-terminal Yqey domain) or in trans (the Arc1p protein associating with GluRS). These added domains are absent in contemporary bacterial GlnRS and GluRS. Here, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae enzymes as models, we find that the eukaryote-specific protein domains substantially influence amino acid binding, tRNA binding and aminoacylation efficiency, but they play no role in either specific nucleotide readout or discrimination against noncognate tRNA. Eukaryotic tRNA^Gln and tRNA^Glu recognition determinants are found in equivalent positions and are mutually exclusive to a significant degree, with key nucleotides located adjacent to portions of the protein structure that differentiated during the evolution of archaeal nondiscriminating GluRS to GlnRS. These findings provide important corroboration for the evolutionary model and suggest that the added eukaryotic domains arose in response to distinctive selective pressures associated with the greater complexity of the eukaryotic translational apparatus. We also find that the affinity of GluRS for glutamate is significantly increased when Arc1p is not associated with the enzyme. This is consistent with the lower concentration of intracellular glutamate and the dissociation of the Arc1p:GluRS complex upon the diauxic shift to respiratory conditions.     

A study of the interaction of Escherichia coli elongation factor-Tu with aminoacyl-tRNAs by partial digestion with cobra venom ribonuclease

The hydrolysis of several aminoacylated transfer RNAs, by double-strand-specific ribonuclease from Naja oxiana was studied. The sensitivity to this enzyme of Phe-tRNA^Phe, Glu-tRNA^Glu and Met-tRNA_m^Met from Escherichia coli and Phe-tRNA^Phe from yeast was examined, both in the free state and complexed to E. coli elongation factor Tu. The hydrolysis patterns in the isolated state were similar for all aminoacylated tRNAs except Glu-tRNA₂^Glu, which exhibited striking differences probably arising from the existence of several subpopulations of tRNA₂^Glu. When engaged in a ternary complex with EF-Tu and GTP, the aminoacyl-tRNAs were efficiently protected in the amino acid acceptor and TΨC helices, showing that the interaction with EF-Tu primarily takes place at the -C-C-A end and at the amino acid acceptor and TΨC helices. In all cases an increased reactivity of the anticodon stem was observed in the complexed tRNA, possibly resulting from a conformational change in this region of the tRNAs.     

Rationally evolving tRNAPyl for efficient incorporation of noncanonical amino acids

Genetic encoding of noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) into proteins is a powerful approach to study protein functions. Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS), a polyspecific aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase in wide use, has facilitated incorporation of a large number of different ncAAs into proteins to date. To make this process more efficient, we rationally evolved tRNA^Pyl to create tRNA^Pyl-opt with six nucleotide changes. This improved tRNA was tested as substrate for wild-type PylRS as well as three characterized PylRS variants (N^ϵ-acetyllysyl-tRNA synthetase [AcKRS], 3-iodo-phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase [IFRS], a broad specific PylRS variant [PylRS-AA]) to incorporate ncAAs at UAG codons in super-folder green fluorescence protein (sfGFP). tRNA^Pyl-opt facilitated a 5-fold increase in AcK incorporation into two positions of sfGFP simultaneously. In addition, AcK incorporation into two target proteins (Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase and human histone H3) caused homogenous acetylation at multiple lysine residues in high yield. Using tRNA^Pyl-opt with PylRS and various PylRS variants facilitated efficient incorporation of six other ncAAs into sfGFP. Kinetic analyses revealed that the mutations in tRNA^Pyl-opt had no significant effect on the catalytic efficiency and substrate binding of PylRS enzymes. Thus tRNA^Pyl-opt should be an excellent replacement of wild-type tRNA^Pyl for future ncAA incorporation by PylRS enzymes.     

Enzymatic binding of aminoacyl transfer ribonucleic acid to ribosomes: the study of binding sites of 2' and 3' isomers of aminoacyl transfer ribonucleic acid.

The mechanism of enzymatic binding of AAtRNA to the acceptor site Escherichia coli ribosomes has been studied using the following aminoacyl oligonucleotides as models of the 3' terminus of AA-tRNA: C-A-Phe, C-A-(2'-Phe)H, and C-A(2'H)Phe. T-psi-C-Gp was used as a model of loop IV of tRNA. The EF-T dependent binding of Phe-tRNA to ribosomes (in the presence of either GTP or GMPPCP) and the GTPase activity associated with EF-T dependent binding of the Phe-tRNA were inhibited by C-A-Phe,C-A(2'Phe)H, and C-A(2'H)Phe. These aminoacyl oligonucleotides inhibit both the formation of ternary complex EF-Tu-GTP-AA-tRNA and the interaction of this complex with the ribosomal A site. The uncoupled EF-Tu dependent GTPase (in the absence of AA-tRNA) was also inhibited by C-A-Phe, C-A(2'Phe)H, and C-A(2'H)Phe, while nonenzymatic binding of Phe-tRNA to the ribosomal A site was inhibited by C-A-Phe and C-A(2'-Phe)H, but not by C-A(2'H)Phe. The tetranucleotide T-psi-C-Gp inhibited both enzyme binding of Phe-tRNA and EF-T dependent GTP hydrolysis. However, inhibition of the latter reaction occured at a lower concentration of T-psi-C-Gp suggesting a specific role of T-psi-C-Gp loop of AA-tRNA in the GTPase reaction. The role of the 2' and 3' isomers of AA-tRNA during enzymatic binding to ribosomes is discussed and it is suggested that 2' leads to 3' transacylation in AA-tRNA is a step which follows GTP hydrolysis but precedes peptide bond formation.