Replication-associated repair of adenine:8-oxoguanine mispairs by MYH

Cellular DNA is constantly exposed to the risk of oxidation. 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is one of the major DNA lesions generated by oxidation, which is primarily corrected by base excision repair. When it is not repaired prior to replication, replicative DNA polymerases yield misinsertion of an adenine (A) opposite the 8-oxoG on the template strand, generating an A:8-oxoG mispair. MYH, a mammalian homolog of Escherichia coli MutY, is a DNA glycosylase responsible for initiating base excision repair of such a mispair by excising the adenine opposite 8-oxoG. Here, using an in vivo repair system, we show that DNA replication enhances the repair of the A:8-oxoG mispair. Repair efficiency was lower in MYH-deficient murine cells than in MYH-proficient cells. Transfection of the MYH-deficient cells with a wild-type MYH expression vector increased the efficiency of A:8-oxoG repair, indicating that a significant part of this replication-associated repair depends on MYH. Expression of a mutant MYH in which the PCNA binding motif was disrupted did not increase the repair efficiency, thus suggesting that the interaction between PCNA and MYH is critical for MYH-initiated repair of A:8-oxoG.     

Strong functional interactions of TFIIH with XPC and XPG in human DNA nucleotide excision repair, without a preassembled repairosome

In mammalian cells, the core factors involved in the damage recognition and incision steps of DNA nucleotide excision repair are XPA, TFIIH complex, XPC-HR23B, replication protein A (RPA), XPG, and ERCC1-XPF. Many interactions between these components have been detected, using different physical methods, in human cells and for the homologous factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Several human nucleotide excision repair (NER) complexes, including a high-molecular-mass repairosome complex, have been proposed. However, there have been no measurements of activity of any mammalian NER protein complex isolated under native conditions. In order to assess relative strengths of interactions between NER factors, we captured TFIIH from cell extracts with an anti-cdk7 antibody, retaining TFIIH in active form attached to magnetic beads. Coimmunoprecipitation of other NER proteins was then monitored functionally in a reconstituted repair system with purified proteins. We found that all detectable TFIIH in gently prepared human cell extracts was present in the intact nine-subunit form. There was no evidence for a repair complex that contained all of the NER components. At low ionic strength TFIIH could associate with functional amounts of each NER factor except RPA. At physiological ionic strength, TFIIH associated with significant amounts of XPC-HR23B and XPG but not other repair factors. The strongest interaction was between TFIIH and XPC-HR23B, indicating a coupled role of these proteins in early steps of repair. A panel of antibodies was used to estimate that there are on the order of 10(5) molecules of each core NER factor per HeLa cell.     

Distinct repair activities of human 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase for formamidopyrimidine and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine

7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) and 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxyformamidopyrimidine (Fapy) are major DNA lesions formed by reactive oxygen species and are involved in mutagenic and/or lethal events in cells. Both lesions are repaired by human 7, 8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) in human and Escherichia coli cells, respectively. In the present study, the repair activities of hOGG1 and Fpg were compared using defined oligonucleotides containing 8-oxoG and a methylated analog of Fapy (me-Fapy) at the same site. The k(cat)/K(m) values of hOGG1 for 8-oxoG and me-Fapy were comparable, and this was also the case for Fpg. However, the k(cat)/K(m) values of hOGG1 for both lesions were approximately 80-fold lower than those of Fpg. Analysis of the Schiff base intermediate by NaBH(4) trapping implied that lower substrate affinity and slower hydrolysis of the intermediate for hOGG1 than Fpg accounted for the difference. hOGG1 and Fpg showed distinct preferences of the base opposite 8-oxoG, with the activity differences being 19.8- (hOGG1) and 12-fold (Fpg) between the most and least preferred bases. Surprisingly, such preferences were almost abolished and less than 2-fold for both enzymes when me-Fapy was a substrate, suggesting that, unlike 8-oxoG, me-Fapy is not subjected to paired base-dependent repair. The repair efficiency of me-Fapy randomly incorporated in M13 DNA varied at the sequence level, but orders of preferred and unpreferred repair sites were quite different for hOGG1 and Fpg. The distinctive activities of hOGG1 and Fpg including enzymatic parameters (k(cat)/K(m)), paired base, and sequence context effects may originate from the differences in the inherent architecture of the DNA binding domain and catalytic mechanism of the enzymes.     

Recruitment of the nucleotide excision repair endonuclease XPG to sites of UV-induced dna damage depends on functional TFIIH

The structure-specific endonuclease XPG is an indispensable core protein of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) machinery. XPG cleaves the DNA strand at the 3' side of the DNA damage. XPG binding stabilizes the NER preincision complex and is essential for the 5' incision by the ERCC1/XPF endonuclease. We have studied the dynamic role of XPG in its different cellular functions in living cells. We have created mammalian cell lines that lack functional endogenous XPG and stably express enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-tagged XPG. Life cell imaging shows that in undamaged cells XPG-eGFP is uniformly distributed throughout the cell nucleus, diffuses freely, and is not stably associated with other nuclear proteins. XPG is recruited to UV-damaged DNA with a half-life of 200 s and is bound for 4 min in NER complexes. Recruitment requires functional TFIIH, although some TFIIH mutants allow slow XPG recruitment. Remarkably, binding of XPG to damaged DNA does not require the DDB2 protein, which is thought to enhance damage recognition by NER factor XPC. Together, our data present a comprehensive view of the in vivo behavior of a protein that is involved in a complex chromatin-associated process.     

Futile short-patch DNA base excision repair of adenine:8-oxoguanine mispair

8-Oxo-7, 8-dihydrodeoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG), one of the representative oxidative DNA lesions, frequently mispairs with the incoming dAMP during mammalian DNA replication. Mispaired dA is removed by post-replicative base excision repair (BER) initiated by adenine DNA glycosylase, MYH, creating an apurinic (AP) site. The subsequent mechanism ensuring a dC:8-oxo-dG pair, a substrate for 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1), remains to be elucidated. At the nucleotide insertion step, none of the mammalian DNA polymerases examined exclusively inserted dC opposite 8-oxo-dG that was located in a gap. AP endonuclease 1, which possesses 3′→5′ exonuclease activity and potentially serves as a proofreader, did not discriminate dA from dC that was located opposite 8-oxo-dG. However, human DNA ligases I and III joined 3′-dA terminus much more efficiently than 3′-dC terminus when paired to 8-oxo-dG. In reconstituted short-patch BER, repair products contained only dA opposite 8-oxo-dG. These results indicate that human DNA ligases discriminate dC from dA and that MYH-initiated short-patch BER is futile and hence this BER must proceed to long-patch repair, even if it is initiated as short-patch repair, through strand displacement synthesis from the ligation-resistant dC terminus to generate the OGG1 substrate, dC:8-oxo-dG pair.     

Strand-specific processing of 8-oxoguanine by the human mismatch repair pathway: inefficient removal of 8-oxoguanine paired with adenine or cytosine

Genomic DNA and its precursors are susceptible to oxidation during aerobic cellular metabolism, and at least five distinct repair activities target a single common lesion, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG). The human mismatch repair (MMR) pathway, which has been implicated in an apoptotic response to covalent DNA damage, is likely to encounter 8-oxoG in both the parental and daughter strand during replication. Here, we show that lesions containing 8-oxoG paired with adenine or cytosine, which are most likely to arise during replication, are not efficiently processed by the mismatch repair system. Lesions containing 8-oxoG paired with thymine or guanine, which are unlikely to arise, are excised in an MSH2/MSH6-dependent manner as effectively as the corresponding mismatches when placed in a context that reflects the daughter strand during replication. Using a newly developed assay based on methylation sensitivity, we characterized strand-excision events opposite 8-oxoG situated to reflect placement in the parental strand. Lesions that efficiently trigger strand excision and resynthesis (8-oxoG paired with thymine or guanine) result in adenine or cytosine insertion opposite 8-oxoG. These latter pairings are poor substrates for further action by mismatch repair, but precursors for alternative pathways with non-mutagenic outcomes. We suggest that the lesions most likely to be encountered by the human mismatch repair pathway during replication, 8-oxoG.A or 8-oxoG.C, are likely to escape processing in either strand by this system. Taken together, these data suggest that the human mismatch repair pathway is not a major contributor to removal of misincorporated 8-oxoG, nor is it likely to trigger repeated attempts at lesion processing.