Fine needle biopsy with cytology in paediatrics: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and the role of ancillary techniques

Fine needle biopsy (FNB) with cytology has long been regarded as an excellent technique as the first choice for diagnosing adult tumours. Being an inexpensive minimally invasive technique with high accuracy and diagnostic immediacy through rapid on‐site evaluation, it is also ideal for implementation in the paediatric setting, particularly in developing countries. Furthermore, it allows complementary and advanced procedures such as flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), among others, which enhances the diagnostic capacity of this technique and gives it a key role in risk stratification and therapeutic decision‐making for several tumours. The advantages of FNB are optimized in the setting of a multidisciplinary team where cytologist, clinician and radiologist play leading roles. Paediatric tumours are rare and most ancillary techniques are cost‐effective but complex to be implemented in small centres with limited experience in paediatric pathology. Therefore reference centres are essential, in order to establish teams with extensive experience and expertise. Hence, any child with a suspected malignancy should be directly referred to a paediatric oncology unit. Focusing on a practical approach to the assessment of paediatric lymphadenopathies and non‐central nervous system solid tumours we review the effectiveness of FNB as applied concurrently with ancillary techniques in a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic decisions of paediatric tumours and tumour‐like lesions.     

Diagnostic dilemmas of hyalinizing trabecular tumours on fine needle aspiration cytology: a study of seven cases with BRAF mutation analysis

T. Kim, Y. L. Oh, K. M. Kim and J. H. Shin Diagnostic dilemmas of hyalinizing trabecular tumours on fine needle aspiration cytology: a study of seven cases with BRAF mutation analysis Objective: Hyalinizing trabecular tumours (HTTs) are rare follicular‐derived neoplasms that behave in an almost benign manner. HTT is frequently misdiagnosed as papillary carcinoma by fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology or as papillary or medullary carcinoma on surgical resection. Methods: The authors examined FNA material from seven cases of histologically verified HTT. Cytological findings were reviewed and correlated with ultrasonographic and histological features. In addition, MIB‐1 and calcitonin immunostaining was performed on surgical specimens, and BRAF mutation analysis on three pre‐operative FNA specimens and seven histology specimens. Results: The original cytological diagnosis was either suspicious or positive for papillary carcinoma in all patients. The FNA‐based differential diagnoses included HTT, papillary carcinoma or, less likely, medullary carcinoma in two patients. Aspirates showed oval to spindle‐shaped cells with frequent intranuclear inclusions, isolated in loosely cohesive groups with a trabecular or syncytial pattern in a bloody background. Radiating arrangements of tumour cells surrounding hyaline stroma with serrated calcifications and a lack of papillary or sheet‐like fragments may suggest HTT on FNA. Spherical calcified bodies and possible psammoma bodies were frequently found in three cases. Retrospectively, six of the seven cases showed membranous immunoreactivity for MIB‐1, but none of the seven possessed the BRAF (V600E) mutation or showed calcitonin reactivity. Conclusions: Although the recognition of HTT on FNA cytology is difficult, because of its morphological similarities to papillary and medullary carcinoma, its characteristic cytological features along with ultrasonographic findings may suggest the diagnosis preoperatively and avoid surgical over‐treatment.     

Value of EUS‐FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours

Y. Kopelman, S. Marmor, I. Ashkenazi and Z. Fireman
Value of EUS‐FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is performed in order to achieve a definite tissue diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. This in turn is a guide to the appropriate treatment for the patient. Tissue samples collected by the same needle for cytological preparations and cell block histological sections (often referred to as FNA‐cytology and FNA–biopsy, respectively) are handled differently. The specific contribution of each of these tests was evaluated. Methods: One hundred and two consecutive patients underwent EUS‐FNA while being investigated for pancreatic solid lesions. Diagnosis was made by cytology, cell block sections or both. The diagnosis was confirmed by clinical outcome. Results: Male/female ratio was 61/41. Mean age was 65 ± 12 years (range, 22–94). Mean lesion size was 3.1 ± 1.8 cm (range, 0.6–10 cm); 68% were >2 cm and 75% were located in the pancreatic head. The average number of needle passes was two (range, 1–4 passes). Final tissue diagnosis was malignant in 66 (65%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 73%, 94% and 81%, respectively, for cytology alone, and 63%, 100% and 78%, for cell blocks alone. Eighty‐two patients (80%) had cytology and cell blocks, which matched in 64 (78%) patients. EUS‐FNA results that relied on both techniques had 84% sensitivity, 94% specificity and 88% accuracy. Cytology revealed 13 malignancies not diagnosed on cell blocks, while cell blocks revealed five malignancies not diagnosed by cytology. Malignant lesions were more common in men; they were larger in size and located in the pancreatic head. Conclusion: EUS‐FNA cytology was more sensitive than cell blocks but less specific for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. The two methods are complementary and implementing both improves the diagnostic value of EUS‐FNA.     

Management of thyroid cytological material,preanalytical procedures and bio‐banking

Thyroid nodules are common and are increasingly detected due to recent advances in imaging techniques. However, clinically relevant thyroid cancer is rare and the mortality from aggressive thyroid cancer remains constant. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a standard method for diagnosing thyroid malignancy and the discrimination of malignant nodules from goitre. As the examined nodules on thyroid FNAC are often small incidental findings, it is important to maintain a low rate of undetermined diagnoses requiring further clinical work up or surgery. The most important factors determining the accuracy of the cytological diagnosis and suitability for biobanking of thyroid FNACs are the quality of the sample and availability of adequate tissue for auxiliary studies. This article discusses technical aspects (preanalytics) of performing thyroid FNAC, including image guidance and rapid on‐site evaluation, sample collection methods (conventional slides, liquid‐based methods, cell blocks) and storage (bio‐banking). The spectrum of special studies (immunocytochemistry on direct slides or liquid‐based cytology, immunohistochemistry on cell blocks and molecular methods) required for improving the precision of the cytological diagnosis of the thyroid nodules is also discussed.     

The big problem of the missing cytology slides

Cytology slides are often unique and irreplaceable. Unlike surgical pathology cases, where additional paraffin sections can be cut, cytology slides often cannot be duplicated because there are only a few direct smears or the diagnostic material is present on a single slide. Cytology slides are often "sent out" to other physicians, laboratories or hospitals, typically so that the pathologist at the institution where the patient will receive treatment can review the slides. Less often, a cytology lab sends out the slides for a second opinion or as part of the discovery process in a lawsuit, where they may or may not be defendants. Rarely, unique and irreplaceable cytology slides are lost. This article presents a hypothetical scenario that is based on reported state appellate court decisions. The article discusses some of the legal issues that will affect the defendant cytologist/cytology lab and the "expert cytologist," and suggests some steps a cytologist/cytology lab can take to minimize the risk of repercussions from a lost unique and irreplaceable cytology slide.     

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas: cytomorphological evaluation with emphasis on adequacy assessment,diagnostic criteria and contamination from the gastrointestinal tract1

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) has been proved to be safe, efficient and reliable in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. This study evaluated specimen adequacy, diagnostic criteria of various pancreatic neoplasms and contamination from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Methods: EUS‐guided FNA of the pancreas and subsequent surgical resections performed at the University of California Irvine Medical Center during February 1996–October 2000 were retrospectively selected. Modified Papanicolaou staining method was used for immediate evaluation and cell block prepared. Results: A total of 267 cases were available for review, including 147 (55.1%) positive/suspicious, 10 (3.7%) atypical, 96 (36.0%) negative and 14 (5.2%) unsatisfactory cases. Eighty‐six (58.5%) positive/suspicious cases had histological confirmation and 12 (8.3%) had lymph node or distant metastases by cytology. Three atypical, two negative, and two unsatisfactory cases proved to have adenocarcinoma. Contamination from duodenum, stomach or pancreas was found in 77 positive/suspicious, three atypical and 90 negative cases. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were 94.6%, 100%, 95.6%, 100%, 82% respectively. Conclusions: EUS FNA is efficient and accurate in the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms in adequate samples. Contamination from the GI tract should be well recognized to avoid misinterpretation.     

Current state of whole slide imaging use in cytopathology: Pros and pitfalls

Whole slide imaging (WSI) allows generation of large whole slide images and their navigation with zoom in and out like a true virtual microscope. It has become widely used in surgical pathology for many purposes, such as education and training, research activity, teleconsultation, and primary diagnosis. However, in cytopathology, the use of WSI has been lagging behind histology, mainly due to the cytological specimen's characteristics, as groups of cells of different thickness are distributed throughout the slide. To allow the same focusing capability of light microscope, slides have to be scanned at multiple focal planes, at the cost of longer scan times and larger file size. These are the main technical pitfalls of WSI for cytopathology, partly overcome by solutions like liquid‐based preparations. Validation studies for the use in primary diagnosis are less numerous and more heterogeneous than in surgical pathology. WSI has been proved effective for training students and successfully used in proficiency testing, allowing the creation of digital cytology atlases. Longer scan times are also a barrier for use in rapid on‐site evaluation, but WSI retains its advantages of easy sharing of images for consultation, multiple simultaneous viewing in different locations, the possibility of unlimited annotations and easy integration with medical records. Moreover, digital slides set the laboratory free from reliance on a physical glass slide, with no more concern of fading of stain or slide breakage. Costs are still a problem for small institutions, but WSI can also represent the beginning of a more efficient way of working.     

Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of Warthin’s tumour of the salivary glands

J. M. Viguer, B. Vicandi, J. A. Jiménez‐Heffernan, P. López‐Ferrer, P. González‐Peramato and C. Castillo
Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of Warthin’s tumour of the salivary glands Objective: Local excision surgical procedures and non‐surgical conservative management are considered alternatives to superficial parotidectomy in the treatment and management of Warthin’s tumour (WT). Such therapeutic alternatives demand accurate diagnosis. In order to determine whether fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is capable of rendering such a minimally invasive diagnosis, we evaluated its accuracy and diagnostic parameters in a large series of histologically proven cases of WT. Methods: A cytohistological study of 116 salivary tumours from 110 patients (four WT were bilateral) with a histological or cytological diagnosis of WT. Results: Histology confirmed the cytological diagnosis in 103 of 114 tumours (90.4%). Two tumours were incorrectly diagnosed on cytology as WT. In 11 cases of WT there was an erroneous or non‐representative cytological diagnosis. The sensitivity was 90.4%, and positive predictive value 98.1%. Regarding malignancy, there were three misdiagnoses. One tumour diagnosed as WT was a low‐grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Two cases considered ‘suspicious of squamous cell carcinoma’ corresponded to WT. After review, 81.3% of the cases of WT were considered typical and 18.7% non‐typical; all misdiagnoses were in the latter group. Cytological difficulties could be divided into three areas: (i) absence of one or more diagnostic components; (ii) ‘squamoid’ pattern; and (iii) mucinous metaplasia. Degenerated oncocytes were present in 65% of cases. Conclusions: FNAC offers the possibility of a reliable diagnosis of WT. Pathologists must pay attention to the squamous appearance of degenerated oncocytes. Cytology, when coupled with clinical and image findings, may permit conservative tumour management.     

Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology

T. Heard, A. Chandra, G. Culora, S.S. Gupta, A. Herbert and M. Morgan
Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology Objective: To audit the use of the ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS) for internal quality control (IQC) in the place of rapid review (RR), and to compare its performance with routine primary screening. Method: During 9 months, 16 462 ThinPrep slides were processed by TIS. Slides were initially reviewed using the TIS review scope, as recommended by the manufacturer: 22 fields of view were observed and, if considered abnormal, a full microscopic review was conducted using the review scope. Different biomedical scientists (BMSs), working on each procedure in rotation, performed batches of TIS‐assisted quality control and routine primary screening independently on unmarked slides. Any slides with abnormalities detected by either method were referred to a consultant pathologist or advanced BMS practitioner for a final report. TIS results were compared with both previous records of RR and routine primary screening carried out on the same slides. We used the UK terminology in which ‘dyskaryosis’ is equivalent to squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) and borderline to atypical (including squamous and glandular cells). Results: TIS preview detected significantly more high‐grade dyskaryosis compared with RR during the previous 4 years: 2.0–4.2 compared with 0.1–1.8 detected per 1000 slides (P = 0.0001). TIS and routine screening were equivalent in sensitivity and specificity for the final cytology result, but BMSs were significantly more likely to classify slides as dyskaryotic rather than borderline when using TIS compared with routine screening. Referrals for potentially high‐grade abnormalities detected by TIS‐assisted IQC alone found 28 biopsies of at least cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2+), whereas 15 CIN2+ biopsies were found on routine screening but missed using TIS. There was no significant change in the rates of inadequate tests, high‐ or low‐grade cytological abnormalities, or positive predictive value for CIN2+ when TIS was in use. Conclusions: Screening with TIS was more sensitive than RR for IQC, providing a rescreening method equivalent to routine primary screening in overall accuracy.     

Use of fine needle aspiration biopsy in radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the utility of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of suspected metastatic tumors at various sites. STUDY DESIGN: Eighteen patients referred for RFA underwent 21 aspirations prior to the procedure. A radiologist performed the FNAB and RFA with radiographic guidance. On-site preliminary evaluation of Diff-Quik-stained smears were followed with Papanicolaou staining. A final diagnosis was rendered and compared to the preliminary diagnosis. RESULTS: Liver was aspirated in 17 cases, lung in 3 cases and pubic bone in 1. Fifteen aspirates were deemed on site as positive or suspicious for malignancy. A preliminary, on-site diagnosis of benign was given in one case and adequate with deferment for review of all slides in four others. One FNAB was unsatisfactory. All but one (patient with benign diagnosis) then immediately proceeded to RFA of the lesion. After review of additional slides, the final diagnosis confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma in 16, hepatocellular carcinoma in 2 and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma in 1. One FNAB yielded benign hepatocytes, and one was unsatisfactory. CONCLUSION: FNAB is an accurate, safe and rapid method of confirming disease in patients just prior to undergoing RFA.     

Optimizing specimen collection and laboratory procedures reduces the non‐diagnostic rate for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of solid lesions of the pancreas

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is a routine technique to assess solid pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of optimizing laboratory procedures for specimen preparation on the rate and accuracy of the procedure. Methods: All EUS‐FNAs of solid pancreatic lesions performed during the year 2000 (Period 1) and from May 2003 to May 2004 (Period 2) were analysed. During Period 1, one experienced gastroenterologist performed all EUS‐FNAs, making direct smears and retrieving small fragments if present on the smear for histology. In Period 2, two endoscopists performed the EUS‐FNAs and all the material was emptied into a vial containing a fixative. Slide preparation was carried out in the pathology laboratory: one slide was processed using cytocentrifugation and cell blocks were made from left‐over material. Neither period utilized rapid on‐site evaluation. Results: During the two periods, 67 and 102 FNAs were analysed and showed significantly different (P < 0.001) non‐diagnostic rates of 22.8% and 4.2%, respectively. The increased diagnostic yield can be explained by the modified laboratory procedures and to a lesser extent by the increased experience of the gastroenterologists. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy in the second time period were, respectively, 90.6%, 100%, 100%, 81.8% and 93.4%, not significantly different from the first time period. Conclusion: This study shows that accurate EUS‐FNA results may be obtained with a low non‐diagnostic rate comparable to those reported for rapid on‐site evaluation by optimizing laboratory specimen processing in a setting of solid pancreatic lesions.     

Role and accuracy of rapid on‐site evaluation of CT‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules

A. Fassina, M. Corradin, D. Zardo, R. Cappellesso, F. Corbetti and M. Fassan
Role and accuracy of rapid on‐site evaluation of CT‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules Objective: To prospectively investigate the role of trans‐thoracic fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) and the value of rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) in the clinical management of patients with pulmonary nodules/masses. Computed tomography (CT)‐guided FNA is commonly employed for the diagnosis of lung lesions although its position in the diagnostic work‐up is still a matter of debate. Methods: We reviewed 311 patients (211 males and 100 females, mean age 69.5 years) admitted to the University of Padova from 2004 to 2008, correlating the results of cytology with the available histological findings obtained from biopsies, surgery or autopsy. Results: Smears were adequate in 305 cases (98%) and inadequate in six (2%); a diagnosis of malignancy was achieved in 263 cases (86.2%); 39 cases (12.8%) were classified as non‐malignant; and three cases (1%) were classified as suspect for malignancy. When correlated with histology, FNA with ROSE discriminated malignant versus non‐malignant lesions (Cohen’s kappa 0.78), with three false negatives (sensitivity 96.3%, specificity 100%). Moreover, a satisfactory overall agreement of 71.4% was achieved in differentiating the cancer histological types. Pneumothorax occurred in 13 cases, haemoptysis in four, and chest pain in three. A single aspiration was sufficient in 79.6% of patients; two aspirations were needed in 17.4% and three in 3%. The low complication rate was related to the limited number of aspirations needed due to ROSE. Conclusions: FNA with ROSE is a safe and useful tool in the diagnostic work‐up of lung cancer patients, with no contraindications to its use as the first diagnostic procedure for all patients with peripheral lung lesions. FNA with ROSE should be reconsidered in the guidelines for diagnosing and managing lung cancer.     

Multifocality and multicentricity are not contraindications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery

Extra-abdominal desmoid tumours are slow-growing, histologically benign tumours of fibroblastic origin with variable biologic behaviour. They are locally aggressive and invasive to surrounding anatomic structures. Magnetic resonance imaging is the modality of choice for the diagnosis and the evaluation of the tumours. Current management of desmoids involves a multidisciplinary approach. Wide margin surgical resection remains the main treatment modality for local control of the tumour. Amputation should not be the initial treatment, and function-preserving procedures should be the primary treatment goal. Adjuvant radiation therapy is recommended both for primary and recurrent lesions. Chemotherapy may be used for recurrent or unresectable disease. Overall local recurrence rates vary and depend on patient's age, tumour location and margins at resection.     

Tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology: a feasible tool for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients

K. Yamashiro, K. Taira, M. Nakajima, D. Okuyama, M. Azuma, H. Takeda, H. Suzuki, H. Jotoku, K. Watanabe, M. Takahashi, K. Taguchi and M. Tamura
Tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology: a feasible tool for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients Objectives: A unique diagnostic method was designed for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer patients, and the results were verified with 2 years of experience. Methods: Excised lymph nodes were cut into 2‐mm‐thick slices and rinsed thoroughly in CytoRich Red^®. The sliced tissues were embedded in a paraffin block. Three cytological glass slides of the cells exfoliated in CytoRich Red^® were prepared by the SurePath^® liquid‐based cytology (LBC) technique. Two slides were stained by the Papanicolaou method, and the remaining slide was immunostained with an anti‐keratin antibody. This process is called tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology (TRLBC). The results of TRLBC were compared with those of the final pathological diagnoses, including immunostaining with an anti‐keratin antibody on paraffin blocks (PB). Results: This study analysed 444 SLNs from 247 consecutive breast cancer patients. It required 35 minutes to complete the intraoperative diagnosis on a single node, and it took an additional 5 minutes per node if more than one node was submitted. When the results of PB were assumed to be the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of TRLBC were 81.9% and 96.1%, respectively. TRLBC detected all nodes with macrometastasis and 23 of 24 nodes with micrometastasis. Fifteen false‐negative TRLBC results were ‘isolated tumour cell clusters’ on PB, but there was one with micrometastasis histologically. Four of 14 false‐positive TRLBC results were proven to be true positive by supplementary examination using step sectioning of the paraffin blocks of the nodes. Conclusion: TRLBC is a feasible and promising intraoperative cytopathological tool showing a comparable efficacy to PB while still allowing the conventional postoperative histological examination.     

Cervicovaginal cytology in uterine adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy and to characterize the findings in false-negative cases, the results of cervicovaginal cytology in 56 adenocarcinomas and 25 adenosquamous carcinomas (42 cervical, 36 endometrial, 2 metastatic and 1 arising synchronously from both cervix and endometrium) were reviewed, including review of the actual slides in 56 cases. Overall, 80% of the initial cytologic diagnoses resulted in diagnostic curettage (i.e., cytology was effectively positive); 84% of the postreview diagnosis were effectively positive. Nine cytology slides showed no malignant cells; eight of these negative smears showed repair, five were atrophic, two showed a high estrogen effect and one had enlarged atypical bare nuclei. These false-negative diagnoses were associated with an endometrial primary site (P less than .01), endometrioid histology (P less than .005), low-grade or intermediate-grade histology (P less than .005), small size of tumor (P less than .05) and absence of cervical involvement (P less than .005) in those cases in which a hysterectomy was performed. False-negative diagnoses were not associated with an absence of endocervical cells or with scanty cellularity. Of 39 cervical and 28 endometrial carcinomas with a positive cytologic diagnosis (initially or after review of the available slides), cytology correctly identified the primary site in 18% and 54% of the cases, respectively. Cytology incorrectly classified the anatomic site of four cervical and three endometrial carcinomas and considered one case arising in both the endometrium and cervix to be endometrial. Routine cervicovaginal cytology does have a role in screening for uterine glandular carcinoma; to maximize its diagnostic sensitivity, we suggest using a recommendation for curettage in the report of positive cases so that all of the varied cytologic diagnoses associated with glandular carcinomas will receive a uniform clinical response. In those cases with preserved cancer cells, a correlation can be made with the histologic type of the carcinoma, rather than with the anatomic site.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of minor salivary gland tumours of the palate

Fine needle aspiration cytology of minor salivary gland tumours of the palate This retrospective study was carried out to review aspirates from minor salivary gland tumours of the palate and to assess the problems encountered in their diagnosis, especially the cytological diagnosis of newer entities such as polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA). Fifty-five cases of palatal salivary gland tumours aspirated over a period of 16 years were reviewed. Histology was available in 26 cases. Pleomorphic adenoma (27 cases) was the most common benign cytodiagnosis. Eleven aspirates were malignant tumours of which eight cases were adenoid cystic carcinoma and three cases were mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Seven cases were diagnosed on fine needle aspiration as suggestive of PLGA. However histological confirmation was available in only one of these cases. Concordance between the initial and revised typings of the tumours was seen in only 28 cases (54%) in the present study. Initially 18 of the 51 tumours (35.3%) could not be typed; and after review, only three could not be typed. Three cases of oncocytoma could be diagnosed on review only. Palatal salivary gland tumours, although relatively uncommon, are difficult to diagnose cytologically. This is more so in cases of newer entities such as PLGA, as their cytological diagnosis is still not well characterized.     

External quality control for immunocytochemistry on cytology samples: a review of UK NEQAS ICC (cytology module) results

I. S. Kirbis, P. Maxwell, M. S. Fle?ar, K. Miller and M. Ibrahim External quality control for immunocytochemistry on cytology samples: a review of UK NEQAS ICC (cytology module) results Objective: To date, external quality control for immunocytochemistry on cytology samples is provided only by the United Kingdom national external quality assessment service for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation (UK NEQAS ICC & ISH). For the purpose of this study a retrospective analysis of a comprehensive collection of quality‐related data regarding immunocytochemistry on cytology samples collected through this service was analysed. Methods: The quality of immunocytochemical reactions, using on‐line collected data, was analysed for the last 23 UK NEQAS ICC cytology module external quality assessments carried out on cytology samples completed in the period from 2004 to 2010. Results: Our study showed that the majority of participants in the cytology module (66%) sent formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue sections for assessment as in‐house control slides and only 34% sent cytology slides of various types. The highest UK NEQAS ICC score for the quality of immunocytochemical staining among in‐house control slides was achieved on cell block sections, followed by cytospins, FFPE tissue sections, liquid‐based cytology slides and smears. With regard to fixation, acetone‐fixed slides achieved significantly lower scores than other reported fixatives. The strength of agreement in perception of immunocytochemical staining quality was good between in‐house assessors (Kappa = 0.64) but only fair between in‐house and UK NEQAS ICC assessors (Kappa = 0.22). Conclusions: Good quality of immunocytochemical staining can be achieved on cytology slides prepared and fixed in different ways as well as on cell blocks. Unified criteria for high‐quality immunocytochemical staining and proper internal and external quality assurance could facilitate further improvement and standardization of immunocytochemistry on cytology samples.     

Apoptosis and cell proliferation correlated with tumour grade in peritoneal fluids of patients with serous ovarian cancer

A. Kalogeraki, I. Karvela‐Kalogeraki, P. E. Petraki, I. Zois, D. Tamiolakis and E. N. Stathopoulos
Apoptosis and cell proliferation correlated with tumour grade in peritoneal fluids of patients with serous ovarian cancer Objective: Apoptosis and cell proliferation in peritoneal fluids of patients with ovarian serous adenocarcinoma have not been well described in cytology. To investigate the contribution of cell death to the growth of this tumour we analysed both apoptosis and cell proliferation in peritoneal fluids of patients with ovarian serous adenocarcinoma. Methods: We studied 40 tumours from 40 patients with ovarian serous adenocarcinoma. Twelve tumours were high grade, 13 were moderately differentiated and 15 were poorly differentiated. The detection of DNA fragments in situ using the terminal deoxyribonucleotidy transferase (TDT)‐mediated dUTP‐digoxigenin nick‐end labelling (TUNEL) assay was applied to investigate active cell death (apoptosis), and the MIB‐1 antigen was used to investigate cell proliferation. Results: The TUNEL indices were 0.29 ± 0.05, 0.79 ± 0.10 and 2.1 ± 0.90 in Grade I, Grade II and Grade III ovary carcinomas, respectively. The MIB‐1 antigen labelling indices were 6.5 ± 0.09, 12.9 ± 3 and 25.8 ± 6.2, respectively, in the same order of tumour differentiation. The differences in both TUNEL and MIB‐1 labelling indices were statistically significant between Grade I, Grade II and Grade III carcinomas and there was a positive correlation between the two indices (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Apoptosis and cell proliferation increased as the grade of tumour increased in ovarian serous adenocarcinoma, suggesting a rapid turnover of the tumour cells in tumours of higher grade, and may play an important role in the growth and the extension of such cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity.     

Review of negative and low‐grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia

A. Repše‐Fokter, A. Pogačnik, V. Snoj, M. Primic‐Žakelj and M. S. Fležar
Review of negative and low‐grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia Objective: The purpose of the study was to perform a national review of negative, low‐grade and inadequate smears reported during the latest screening period before cervical cancer diagnosis in 2006, after the first 3 years of the screening programme. Methods: Among 162 new cervical cancer cases there were 47 (29%) without previous cytology, 47 (29%) with one high‐grade smear prior to diagnosis and 68 (42.0%) with at least one previous negative, low‐grade, atypical or inadequate smear 1–40 months before diagnosis. Of the latter 68 cases, 37 patients with 59 smears (together with 118 control slides) were included in the review as 31 had smears reported at laboratories no longer operating. Findings were related to the last cytology report before diagnosis as well as to histological type and stage of the cancer. Results: In our study group, 19 (51%) of 37 patients had squamous cell carcinoma, 15 (41%) adenocarcinoma and 3 (8%) adenosquamous carcinoma, compared with 121 (75%), 26 (16%), 12 (7%), respectively, and 3 (2%) other types, for all carcinomas. Twenty‐one of 37 women also had high‐grade cytology prior to diagnosis of cancer. Women with previous cytology (with or without recent high‐grade smears) were more likely to have stage I cancers than those without cytology (P < 0.0001). The expert group upgraded 17/33 smears in the patients with squamous carcinomas, which was more than in those with adeno‐ and adenosquamous carcinomas (5/24, P < 0.05). Conclusion: As expected, a higher proportion of smears preceding adenocarcinomas were true negative. Under‐diagnosed smears were not related to cancer stage or last cytology report before diagnosis.     

Evaluation of fine needle aspiration of the male breast for the diagnosis of gynaecomastia

Fine needle aspiration of the male breast can present problems of diagnosis because the cytological presentation of gynaecomastia can be confused with that of adenocarcinoma. We reviewed breast aspirates from 24 male patients in order to determine the accuracy of cytology as a method of diagnosing gynaecomastia. Discrepancies were observed between the original cytology reports on one hand and the review cytology and biopsies on the other. Of the 24 aspirates from the male breast, the cytology was reported as negative in 16 cases, suspicious in three cases and malignant in five. In four cases of the negative group, a specific diagnosis of gynaecomastia was made. In two of the negative cases the subsequent biopsies revealed adenocarcinoma. Of the five cases reported on the original cytology as adenocarcinoma, two on review showed the features of florid gynaecomastia and this was confirmed on biopsy and three confirmed the initial diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The cytological features of gynaecomastia which distinguish it from adenocarcinoma are discussed.