Renal fine needle aspiration cytology

OBJECTIVE: To audit and evaluate the pitfalls in renal fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 180 renal FNAs from 163 patients, encountered at Canberra Hospital, Australian Capital Territory, between June 1989 and July 1997 was undertaken. The FNA procedures had been performed by radiologists under computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US) guidance. The study correlated the FNA results with biopsy findings and clinical outcome. RESULTS: The initial cytologic diagnoses included 84 (47%) benign, 6 (3%) atypical, 7 (4%) suspicious, 70 (39%) malignant and 13 (7%) inadequate. Six of the 13 cytologically inadequate group, on further investigation, had malignant histology. The benign cytologic categories contained 79 benign conditions and 5 cases with a malignant outcome. The atypical cytologic group contained 5 benign and 1 malignant case. All nine cytologically suspicious cases had malignant histology. The cytologically malignant group contained 62 malignant, 7 benign and 1 patient lost to follow-up. The sensitivity was 92.5%, specificity was 91.9%, positive predictive value was 89.9%, negative predictive value was 94.0%, and efficacy of the test was 92.2%. CONCLUSION: Renal FNA can provide an accurate diagnosis in most instances; however, aspiration cytology of the kidney has limitations and pitfalls. Low grade renal cell carcinoma has to be differentiated from oncocytoma, angiomyolipoma, renal infarct and reactive conditions. Renal FNA has a high negative predictive value, which is useful in reassuring patients with radiologically and cytologically benign lesions. Negative FNA does not exclude malignancy in the presence of a radiologic suspicion.     

Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in a multidisciplinary setting in rural Australia and to compare the imaging (mammographic and ultrasound) appearances and cytomorphologic findings with the final outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of ultrasound-guided FNA cytology results from 426 women, aged 40-86 years, with screening-detected mammographic abnormalities. Cases of microcalcification, assessed mainly by stereotactatic core biopsy, were not included in the study. The FNAs were performed at a rural breast screening and assessment program in New South Wales, Australia, over a three-year period between May 1993 and May 1996. RESULTS: Imaging, FNA and combined imaging and FNA results from 426 women were as follows. The imaging diagnoses included 176 (41%) benign, 34 (8%) probably benign, 17 (4%) equivocal, 104 (24%) suspicious and 95 (23%) malignant cases. The FNA findings showed 59 (14%) no epithelial cells seen (nondiagnostic), 175 (41%) benign, 36 (8%) atypical, 41 (10%) suspicious and 115 (27%) malignant. Combined imaging and cytologic results comprised 224 (52.6%) benign, 10 (2.3%) atypical/equivocal, 59 (13.9%) suspicious and 133 (31.2%) malignant cases. All the malignant cases, by combined assessment, had malignant histology, and all the benign cases behaved in a benign fashion. In 80% of the suspicious lesions, the histologic diagnosis was malignant, but only 10% of the atypical/equivocal lesions had malignant histology. The positive predictive value of diagnosis of malignancy by combined imaging and FNA was 100%, and the false negative rate was 0%. CONCLUSION: Despite the recent surge in the popularity of core biopsy, FNA cytology of impalpable, mammographically detected lesions, when practiced in a multidisciplinary setting, is an extremely accurate test with high sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and efficacy. FNA cytology of the breast is a well-tolerated, relatively noninvasive test with a very low risk of complications. The sensitivity and positive predictive values for malignant and suspicious mammographic categories are also very high.     

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular nodular lesions: role,controversies and approach to diagnosis

A. Wee
Fine needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular nodular lesions: role, controversies and appr oach to diagnosis The role of fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the liver has evolved. Advances in imaging modalities have obviated the need for tissue confirmation in clinically classic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The risks of needle tract seeding and haematogenous dissemination have been actively debated. Nowadays, cytopathologists are confronted by smaller and smaller nodules, detected due to increased surveillance of high‐risk cirrhotic patients. Tissue characterization of small well‐differentiated hepatocellular nodular lesions (size less than and equal to 2 cm) is extremely challenging and has therapeutic implications. Major issues in the cytodiagnosis of HCC include: (i) distinguishing benign hepatocellular nodular lesions, namely, large regenerative nodules, dysplastic nodules, focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma from reactive hepatocytes; (ii) distinguishing well‐differentiated HCC from benign hepatocellular nodular lesions; (iii) distinguishing poorly differentiated HCC from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic carcinomas; (iv) determining the histogenesis of a malignant tumour; and (v) determining the site of origin of a malignant tumour. An overview of the biological evolution and histopathological aspects of dysplastic nodules, small HCCs and ‘nodule‐in‐nodule’ lesions is presented in tandem with clinically relevant nomenclature. An algorithmic approach to FNA diagnosis of HCC and hepatocellular nodular lesions is outlined. Optimal results depend on (i) a dedicated radiologist‐cytopathologist team; (ii) an on‐site cytology service, (iii) a combined cytohistological approach, (iv) immunohistochemistry, and (v) clinicopathological correlation. As we move towards personalized medicine, it is envisaged that hepatic FNA is likely to become a point of care in the management protocol as it takes on the additional role of procurement of tumour and peritumoural tissues for genomic and proteomic profiling to enable targeted molecular therapy.     

The role of micronucleus scoring in fine needle aspirates of ductal carcinoma of the breast

S. Samanta, P. Dey and R. Nijhawan The role of micronucleus scoring in fine needle aspirates of ductal carcinoma of the breast Aims and objectives: Micronucleus (MN) scoring was carried out in benign (fibroadenoma) and malignant (infiltrating ductal carcinoma) breast lesions to evaluate the role of MN as a biomarker in breast carcinomas. We also compared MN scores among different cytological grades of breast carcinoma. Materials and methods: A total of 31 archival cases of fibroadenoma (FA) and 40 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) were selected. The best May‐Grünwald–Giemsa (MGG) stained fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smear of each case was selected. The MN scoring was carried out independently by two observers on 1000 epithelial cells in oil immersion magnification (100× objective). The MN scores in FA and IDC were compared. The IDC cases were graded and the MN scores in different cytological grades of IDC were compared. Results: The mean MN scores (± standard deviation) in FA and IDC were 0.6 (± 1.1) and 13.6 (± 12.8), respectively, which were significantly different (P < 0.0001). There were seven grade 1, 13 grade 2, and 20 grade 3 IDCs. The mean MN scores (± standard deviation) of grade 1, 2 and 3 IDC were 4.3 (± 2.3), 11.95 (± 9.2) and 21.1 (± 16.7), respectively. An analysis of variance (anova ) test showed a significant difference in MN score between all the grades of IDC (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between fibroadenoma and grade 1 IDC. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed positive correlations between MN scoring in the different grades of IDC. Conclusions: MN scoring on routinely stained smears of IDCs was significantly higher than in fibroadenoma and was relatively easy, reliable and reproducible. As MN scoring of grade 1 IDC was similar to fibroadenoma, a larger study should be conducted to compare grade 1 IDC with other benign breast lesions.     

Initial axillary staging of breast cancer using ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration: a liquid‐based cytology study

A. Schiettecatte, C. Bourgain, C. Breucq, N. Buls, V. De Wilde and J. de Mey
Initial axillary staging of breast cancer using ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration: a liquid‐based cytology study Objective: To evaluate the preoperative detection of axillary metastasis combining ultrasound (US)‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and liquid‐based cytology (Surepath^®) to reduce sentinel node procedures. Methods: In total, 148 patients with clinically negative lymph nodes and no preoperative therapy were included. All patients underwent preoperative ultrasound of the axilla with FNAC if suspicious lymph nodes were found. Complete axillary lymph node dissection was performed at primary surgery when FNAC was positive. All other patients underwent a sentinel node procedure. Results: US‐guided FNAC of the axilla revealed metastasis in 34 (23.0%) of the 148 patients. These 34 patients were 53.1% of all patients (n = 64) with proven axillary lymph node involvement. In 66 patients (44.6%), both ultrasound and histopathology were negative. Overall sensitivity of US‐guided FNAC was 50.0%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 70.2%. In T1 tumours, all patients referred for sentinel node procedure were node‐negative. The correlation between malignant FNAC and histopathology was 100%. US‐guided liquid‐based FNAC in patients with no clinically positive lymph nodes reduced the necessity for a sentinel node procedure by 23.0%. Conclusions: We advocate that US‐guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) combined with liquid‐based cytology of axillary lymph nodes should be included in the preoperative staging of breast cancer.     

Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007

S. Piana, A. Frasoldati, M. Ferrari, R. Valcavi, E. Froio, V. Barbieri, C. Pedroni and G. Gardini Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007 Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) has long been recognized as an essential technique for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Although specific cytological patterns have been recognized, a wide variety of reporting schemes for thyroid FNA results have been adopted. This study reports our experience with a five‐category reporting scheme developed in‐house based on a numeric score and applied to a large series of consecutive thyroid FNAs. It focuses mainly on the accuracy of thyroid FNA as a preoperative test in a large subset of histologically distinct thyroid lesions. Methods: During the 1998–2007 period, 18 359 thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNAs were performed on 15 269 patients; FNA reports were classified according to a C1–C5 reporting scheme: non‐diagnostic (C1), benign (C2), indeterminate (C3), suspicious (C4), and malignant (C5). Results: Non‐diagnostic (C1) and indeterminate (C3) FNA results totalled 2 230 (12.1%) and 1 461 (7.9%), respectively, while suspicious (C4) and malignant (C5) results totalled 238 (1.3%) and 531 (2.9%), respectively. Histological results were available in 2 047 patients, with thyroid malignancy detected in 840. Positive predictive value of FNA was 98.1% with a 49.0 likelihood ratio (LR) of malignancy in patients with a C4/C5 FNA report. Conclusions: This five‐category scheme for thyroid FNA is accurate in discriminating between the virtual certainty of malignancy associated with C5, a high rate (92%) of malignancy associated with C4, and a 98% probability of a histological benign diagnosis associated with C2. Further sub‐classifications of C3 may improve the accuracy of the diagnostic scheme and may help in recognizing patients eligible for a ‘wait and see’ management.     

Posters. P17 Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of thyroid swellings

Introduction Fine needle aspiration cytology is regarded as the gold standard investigation in diagnosis of thyroid swellings. Published data suggest an overall accuracy rate of 75% 1 in the detection of thyroid malignancy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of FNA cytology in detection of thyroid malignancy in our surgical unit. Methods Between 1989–2002, 144 patients who underwent thyroid resection by single consultant surgeon and who had pre‐operative FNA were enrolled in this retrospective study. The pre‐operative FNA results were compared with definitive histological diagnosis following thyroid resection. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed using aspirate and non‐aspirate techniques on each thyroid swelling. The cytological sample was assessed by a single cytopathologist and was classified as inadequate, non‐neoplastic, neoplastic, suspicious or indeterminate. The histology was classified as non‐neoplastic (benign) and neoplastic (malignant). Results Fine needle aspiration cytology analysis revealed 94 (13.88%) non‐neoplastic, six (65.27%) neoplastic and 20 (4.16%) suspicious aspirates. Twenty (13.88%) samples were inadequate and four (2.77%) samples were indeterminate. Histological analysis showed 118 (81.94%) benign, 26 (18.05%) malignant specimens. Fine needle aspiration cytology had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of 52.6%, 86.6% and 79.1%, respectively for diagnosing thyroid malignancy. Conclusion The results are comparable with the current published data and demonstrate that FNA cytology in our hands is accurate investigation for pre‐operative diagnosis for the detection of thyroid malignancy.     

Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided pancreatic FNAC diagnosis for solid and cystic lesions at Manchester Royal Infirmary based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme

Objective

To compare endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐FNAC diagnosis of pancreatic lesions with patient outcome based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme diagnostic categories: Panc 1 (non‐diagnostic); Panc 2 (negative for malignancy/neoplasia); Panc 3 (atypical); Panc 4B (neoplastic, benign); Panc 4O (neoplastic, other); Panc 5 (suspicious of malignancy); and Panc 6 (positive/malignant).

Methods

All EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens taken at Manchester Royal Infirmary in 2015 were prospectively classified according to the above scheme at the time of cytology reporting and data recorded prospectively. Subsequently, outcomes based on clinical follow‐up or histopathology diagnosis were compared with the cytology diagnosis.

Results

120 EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens from 111 patients were received, of which 112 (93.3%) specimens had follow‐up data. There were 79 and 41 EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens from solid and cystic lesions, respectively. Based on the cytology diagnosis the specimens were classified as Panc 1 (7.5%), Panc 2 (33.3%), Panc 3 (2.5%), Panc 4B (2.5%), Panc 4O (15.0%), Panc 5 (3.3%) and Panc 6 (35.9%). The performance indicators for diagnosis of malignancy or neoplasia with malignant potential, included sensitivity (95.4%), specificity (100%), positive predictive value (100%), negative predictive value (92.3%), false positive rate (0%) and false negative rate (4.6%).

Conclusions

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme is a logical system that can easily be introduced in a diagnostic cytopathology service. This classification scheme acts as an aid to diagnostic reporting, clear communication of significant results including risk of neoplasia/malignancy to clinicians, clinical audit and comparison of results with other centres.     

Stereotaxic fine needle aspiration cytology of clinically occult malignant and premalignant breast lesions

Stereotaxic fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology was used to study clinically occult (nonpalpable) breast lesions in 114 consecutive patients with mammographically suspicious findings prior to excisional biopsy. The aspirate contained insufficient material for cytologic evaluation in 15 cases (13.2%), which were histologically diagnosed as benign (7 cases), atypical hyperplasia (7 cases) or carcinoma in situ (1 case). The cytologic findings indicated a benign lesion in 77 cases (67.5%), which were histologically diagnosed as benign (71 cases) or atypical ductal hyperplasia (6 cases). The cytologic sample showed atypia in eight cases (7.0%), which were histologically diagnosed as severe atypical ductal hyperplasia (three cases), carcinoma in situ (one case) or proliferative fibrocystic disease (four cases). In the eight cases (7.0%) cytologically interpreted as probably malignant, histology confirmed six invasive carcinomas, one carcinoma in situ and one fibrocystic disease. Of six cases (4.4%) cytologically reported as malignant, five were histologically diagnosed as invasive carcinoma and one as carcinoma in situ. Overall, stereotaxic FNA cytology reported as malignant or probably malignant 14 of the 15 cases with a histologic confirmation of malignancy, for a sensitivity of 93.3%. Cytology correctly identified 78 of the 83 histologically negative cases, for a specificity of 94.0%. The 16 cases histologically diagnosed as ductal hyperplasia, which carries a high risk for subsequent malignancy, were studied in detail in an effort to define histologic and cytologic criteria for this entity. Using selected histologic criteria, 11 of these cases were graded as showing mild-to-moderate atypical hyperplasia and 5 as showing severe atypical hyperplasia. Three of the latter cases were similarly identified by an analogous cytologic grading; the other two cases had insufficient cytologic samples. The total results in this series of 114 cases support the use of stereotaxic FNA cytology in the diagnosis of these nonpalpable breast lesions, examples of which are illustrated. In particular, it may help to raise the low specificity yielded by mammography alone, which would represent a significant advance for the patient in terms of the accuracy, expediency and reduced cost of diagnosing these lesions.     

Cytologic studies of the fallopian tube in patients undergoing salpingo-oophorectomy

Background

Mounting evidence suggests the fallopian tube as the origin for ovarian high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). We attempted to identify the tubal cytological features that allow us to distinguish malignant from benign conditions.

Methods

Tubal specimens (n = 56) were collected from patients who underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) due to various clinical indications. A standard procedure to collect fallopian tube brushings from freshly received surgical specimens was developed. Cytological diagnoses were classified into three categories: benign, atypical, and suspicious for malignancy/malignant. Cytological variables of individual cells and epithelia were subjected to statistical analysis. The fallopian tube histology was used as diagnostic reference for confirmation of cytology diagnosis.

Results

Among the 56 fallopian tube specimens, 2 (3.7 %) showed inadequate cellularity preventing further evaluation, 11 (20.4 %) were diagnosed as malignant or suspicious of malignancy, 7 were atypical, and 36 were benign. The presence of three dimensional clusters (p < 0.0001, Fisher’s Exact Test), or prominent nucleoli (p = 0.0252, Fisher Exact test) was highly correlated with the diagnosis of malignancy. The suspicious malignant/malignant cytological diagnosis was also highly correlated with presence of HGSC with or without serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC).

Conclusions

Tubal cytology may be useful for ovarian cancer screening and early detection.

     

Posters. P19 Cervical carcinoma with metastases to the tympanic membrane: an unusual presentation

Introduction Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a well‐established diagnostic technique which is frequently used to diagnose head and neck neoplasms. Clinical decisions concerning treatment of malignant salivary gland tumours, the extent of surgery and advisability of pre‐operative irradiation can be helped by prior knowledge of tumour type. Aim The aim of this study was to do an audit of all salivary gland FNAs carried out in Beaumont Hospital over a 14‐year period. Methods All salivary gland FNAs between 1989 and 2002 were reviewed. Where available, the corresponding follow‐up histological specimens were studied. Results During this 14‐year period, 305 patients with salivary gland lesions had FNA of the lesion performed. The total number of aspirates performed was 343. Of these, 184 had histologies available for follow‐up. Eighty‐nine aspirates were reported as inadequate; 89 as inflammatory, normal or consistent with cyst contents. One hundred and thirteen aspirates were diagnosed as a benign entity. Thirty‐three aspirates were reported as malignant (21 of which were felt to be primary to the salivary gland and 12 metastatic). Sixteen cases were called suspicious. Good correlation between FNA findings and histology was seen in the majority of cases (145 of 183). Some diagnostic problem areas were identified. These included the following: lymphomas (seven called benign on FNA), Warthin's tumour (seven not diagnosed or misdiagnosed on FNA) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (one reported as pleomorhic adenoma and one as benign/cystic on FNA). Seven pleomorphic adenomas were not diagnosed on FNA pre‐operatively, predominantly due to inadequacy of the specimen. Three other malignancies (acinic cell carcinoma, lymphoepithelial carcinoma and carcinoma ex‐pleomorphic adenoma), while not diagnosed on FNA, were called suspicious, with re‐biopsy advised. Conclusion FNA cytology of salivary glands is an accurate method for evaluation of both benign and malignant lesions, enabling optimum surgical and adjuvant therapy decision‐making pre‐operatively. Well‐defined problem areas are identified and, therefore, clinicopathological correlation is required in these cases.     

Histological examination of clots from cytological specimens: is this a worthwhile procedure?

A comparison of conventional cytology and clot histology was made on 174 serous fluids, fine needle aspirates (FNA) and other non‐gynaecological specimens. In eight cases (4.5%) this clot material contained malignant cells or cells suspicious of malignancy despite the absence of suspicious or malignant cells in conventionally prepared smears from the same specimen. In 11 cases (6.3%) the clot was negative, although conventional smears contained malignant or suspicious cells. A χ² test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the number of positive diagnostic scores in each group with χ² of 0.223 (degrees of freedom=1), P=0.637. Examination of clot material from serous fluids and FNA aspirates is as effective as examination of conventional cytological preparations. Processing of clots from cytological aspirates for histological examination should be more widely adopted, and is applicable in all cytopathology laboratories.     

Implementation of a joint protocol for the management of thyroid nodules with a cytological diagnosis of follicular lesion of undetermined significance: experience in one hospital

Background: Follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) was introduced for fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in which there is insufficient evidence to classify the lesion as follicular neoplasm/suspicious of follicular neoplasm or suspicious for malignancy. The recommended management was repeat FNA and correlation with clinical and radiological data. In 2009 we started a joint clinicopathological protocol to improve management of FLUS, recommending follow‐up with repeat FNA at 6 months. The aim of this study was to report on the audit of results of this protocol. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of the patients with FLUS at a single hospital. Between 2007 and 2010 we found 135 cases with this diagnosis (3.6%). We only had long enough follow‐up information for the 95 patients that were included in the present study. Results: FLUS was diagnosed in 74 FNAs before protocol implementation (3.2%) and 61 FNAs after (4.2%), with follow‐up of 46 and 49 patients, respectively. Before 2009, 38/46 (82.6%) patients had surgical excisions, compared with 32/49 (65.3%): a significant reduction of 17% in the number requiring surgery (P = 0.05). We have also shown a reduction in the median time to surgery (11.9 versus 2.9 months). Despite the joint protocol, the FNA was only repeated in two patients. The histological diagnoses were similar in the two periods of time: 31.6% and 31.3% follicular adenomas; 13.1% and 3.1% (P = 0.2) papillary carcinoma (follicular variant). Conclusions: Implementation of a joint protocol reduced the number of surgical operations in patients with FLUS but in most cases FNA was not repeated as recommended. Excision was justified in one‐third of operated patients. Less than 15% of lesions were malignant, which is in accordance with previous reports in the literature.     

Statistical analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of 678 cases plus 4,265 cases from the literature

Between 1979 and 1984, 678 breast fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytologic specimens were received in our laboratory; tissue follow-up was available for 159 cases (23%). The diagnoses rendered in cases with subsequent tissue study were benign (41%), insufficient (10.5%), atypical and/or suspicious for carcinoma (10.5%) and malignant (38%). Using the tissue diagnosis as the standard, there were four false-negative cytologic results and one false-positive result. Considering only cases with a definitive diagnosis of benign or malignant, the sensitivity of cytologic interpretation for diagnosing malignancy on adequate material was 94% while the specificity was 98%; the overall efficiency of the test was thus 96%. The predictive values were 98% for a positive test and 94% for a negative test. Of the total number of submitted cases, a correct and definitive diagnosis was rendered 76% of the time. Calculation of similar statistics from six other series in which the FNA cytologic diagnoses were compared with the histologic diagnoses yielded data almost identical to our findings. The high degree of uniformity in the data indicates that these statistical parameters can be used as standards for evaluating the efficiency of breast FNA cytology.     

Analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: a review of 1,297 cases and correlation with histologic diagnoses

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the breast and to ascertain its usefulness. STUDY DESIGN: The authors reviewed 1,297 cases of FNA cytology of the breast which were performed at Chonnam National University Hospital from 1999 to 2002. Cytologic diagnoses were compared with histologic diagnoses in 457 cases that underwent both cytologic and histologic examination. RESULTS: Of 1,297 cases, 1,201 (92.6%) were satisfactory and 96 (7.4%) unsatisfactory. Subsequent histologic examination was performed on 291 cases (29.7%) out of 981 "benign" lesions, 28 (73.7%) of 38 "suspicious," 124 (68.1%) of 182 "malignant" and 14 (14.6%) of 96 "unsatisfactory." FNA cytology revealed 77.7% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, 98.4% positive predictive value and 88.0% negative predictive value. Diagnostic accuracy was 91.1%. Of the 291 benign cases on cytology, 35 cases were malignancy on histology. Of the 124 cases reported as malignant, 2 were benign. Interpretive error was the leading cause of false positive diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Although FNA cytology is a useful diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of breast lesions, it should be combined with other diagnostic modalities, such as physical examination, ultrasonography and mammography.     

Pancreatobiliary cytology in the multidisciplinary setting

This review article discusses the role of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS FNA) cytology in the clinical management of patients with pancreatic tumours in the setting of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). The commonest diagnosis encountered is pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which is seldom diagnosed early enough for surgical resection. Thus, cytology is likely to be the only form of diagnosis in the majority of cases. Nevertheless, about half the lesions discussed at the MDT meeting are lesions other than primary adenocarcinoma and a wide differential diagnosis must be considered in order to identify tumours, including neuroendocrine tumours, that are amenable to surgical resection. Cytology is not always definitive and the diagnosis may be helped by categorizing results according to whether they are malignant, suspicious, atypical/indeterminate, benign or inadequate. Discussion at MDT meetings and correlation with clinical and imaging findings along with review of cytology slides may allow equivocal results to be clarified before treatment is decided. Inadequate cytology results are avoided by rapid on‐site evaluation of slides; although this is cost‐effective in terms of overall patient care, attendance of cytopathologists on‐site may not be feasible. At Imperial College NHS Trust, specially trained biomedical scientists successfully carry out rapid on‐site evaluation.     

Follow‐up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology

N. Dincer, S. Balci, A. Yazgan, G. Guney, R. Ersoy, B. Cakir and G. Guler
Follow‐up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology Objective: To report our experience of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) rate and outcome. Methods: Among 7658 patients with 19 569 nodules, 524 (2.7%) nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on fine needle aspiration (FNA). After exclusion of patients with simultaneous nodules that were suspicious for follicular neoplasm or malignancy or that were malignant, 368 (4.8%) patients were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. The outcome of 146 patients who had undergone surgery or repeated fine needle aspirate at the time of preparation of this study was evaluated. The original FNAs were matched to repeated FNAs and thyroidectomy or diagnostic lobectomy specimens. Results: Seventy‐two (19.6%) of the 368 patients had directly undergone surgery, either a lobectomy or a thyroidectomy: of these, 27 (37.5%) had neoplastic nodules (21 were malignant). Seventy‐four (20.1%) of the 368 patients had repeat FNA. On second FNA, 47 of 74 (63.5%) were benign, three were suspicious for follicular neoplasm, one was malignant and 23 (31.1%) were non‐diagnostic. Four patients had a third FNA: two were AUS/FLUS, one was malignant and one non‐diagnostic. One patient had a fourth FNA, which was diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. Sixteen (21.6%) of 74 patients with repeat FNA had surgery: three of these had neoplastic nodules (two were malignant). Overall, 88 of the 368 (23.9%) patients had a thyroidectomy of which 30 (34.1%) were neoplastic and 23 (26.1%) malignant. The neoplastic rate for patients who were once diagnosed with AUS/FLUS was 8.2% and the malignancy rate 6.3%. The malignancy rate for patients on follow‐up at the time we prepared the study was 15.7% (23/146); 222 remained on follow‐up without surgery or repeat FNA or were managed elsewhere. Conclusions: Although in this category repeat FNA is expected rather than excision, we suggest evaluation of all AUS/FLUS patients in multidisciplinary meetings to decide management and recommend follow‐up of all patients with this diagnosis.     

Cut‐off values and significance of Oil Red O‐positive cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

C. Basset‐Léobon, L. Lacoste‐Collin, J. Aziza, J.C. Bes, S. Jozan and M. Courtade‐Saïdi
Cut‐off values and significance of Oil Red O‐positive cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid Objective: To evaluate the percentage and predictive value of Oil Red O‐positive macrophages (ORO‐PM) to identify lipid‐laden macrophages in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) from patients with different pathologies. Methods: The percentage and absolute numbers of ORO‐PM were evaluated in 305 BALF. The patients were separated into ten groups: corticosteroid treatment (n = 18), amiodarone treatment (n = 8), interstitial fibrosis (n = 11), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive (n = 25), infectious pneumonia (n = 43), severe haematological disorder (n = 25), interstitial syndrome (n = 109), suspicion of cancer (n = 17), transplant recipients (n = 50) and controls (n = 43). The total and differential cell counts in BALF were recorded. The presence of specific pathogens was also noted. Parametric and non‐parametric tests were used to compare the values between groups. Receiver–operating characteristics (ROC) curves were established in order to determine a cut‐off value. Results: The percentages of ORO‐PM were (mean ± standard deviation) 21.67 ± 29.12 in the corticosteroid group, 10.00 ± 12.49 in the amiodarone group, 19.45 ± 20.72 in the interstitial fibrosis group, 47.80 ± 30.46 in the HIV group, 19.72 ± 26.26 in the infectious pneumonia group, 27.42 ± 30.04 in the severe haematological disorder group, 25.18 ± 30.63 in the interstitial syndrome group, 17.64 ± 27.76 in the suspicion of cancer group, 22.50 ± 27.27 in the transplanted recipients group and 2.63 ± 3.48 in the control group. Significantly higher values were found in all groups when compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Only the HIV group showed higher numbers of ORO‐PM when compared with the interstitial syndrome group (P < 0.01). According to ROC curves, > 6% ORO‐PM was suggested as the positive cut‐off value. Conclusion: Significantly increased numbers of ORO‐PM were associated with various lung pathologies. However, the higher numbers observed in HIV patients require further investigations.