Studies in vitro on the effects of 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane and 1H,4H(2H)-nonafluorocyclohexane on enzymes and organelles

A comparison has been made of the effect of 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane, which is highly toxic (LD(50) 17mg./kg. in rats), and of 1H,4H(2H)-nonafluorocyclohexane, which is relatively non-toxic (LD(50)>440mg./kg. in rats), on the respiration of rat liver homogenates and mitochondria in vitro. 1H,2H,4H(5H)-Octafluorocyclohexane strongly inhibited the respiration of both homogenates and mitochondria, but neither compound had any significant effect on glycolysis or on glutamate dehydrogenase or NADH-cytochrome c reductase activity. 1H,2H,4H(5H)-Octafluorocyclohexane, however, caused a very marked inhibition of cytochrome oxidase activity, causing an almost complete lesion in this region of the respiratory chain. 1H,4H(2H)-Nonafluorocyclohexane was without effect in this respect. A marked decrease in turbidity of mitochondrial suspensions at 520nm. was caused by addition of both compounds, the effect being greater with 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane. ATP, Mg(2+) and bovine serum albumin did not reverse these changes. Mitochondrial adenosine triphosphatase activity was increased twofold by the toxic compound, but only slightly by the non-toxic compound. Electron-microscopic examination of mitochondria treated with 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane revealed gross morphological damage, whereas the effect of 1H,4H(2H)-nonafluorocyclohexane appeared to be merely to cause swelling. The results obtained account, to some extent at any rate, for the toxic effects of 1H,2H,4H(5H)-octafluorocyclohexane.     

Integration of the barley genetic and seed proteome maps for chromosome 1H, 2H, 3H, 5H and 7H

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was used to screen spring barley cultivars for differences in seed protein profiles. In parallel, 72 microsatellite (simple sequence repeat (SSR)) markers and 11 malting quality parameters were analysed for each cultivar. Over 60 protein spots displayed cultivar variation, including peroxidases, serpins and proteins with unknown functions. Cultivars were clustered based on the spot variation matrix. Cultivars with superior malting quality grouped together, indicating malting quality to be more closely correlated with seed proteomes than with SSR profiles. Mass spectrometry showed that some spot variations were caused by amino acid differences encoded by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Coding SNPs were validated by mass spectrometry, expressed sequence tag and 2D gel data. Coding SNPs can alter function of affected proteins and may thus represent a link between cultivar traits, proteome and genome. Proteome analysis of doubled haploid lines derived from a cross between a malting (Scarlett) and a feed cultivar (Meltan) enabled genetic localisation of protein phenotypes represented by 48 spot variations, involving e.g. peroxidases, serpins, α-amylase/trypsin inhibitors, peroxiredoxin and a small heat shock protein, in relation to markers on the chromosome map. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

14N1H and 2H1H cross-relaxation in hydrated proteins.

The frequency dependence of the proton spin-lattice relaxation time T1 of solid hydrated bovine serum albumin and alpha-chymotrypsin has been measured over 4.5 decades in the range 10(4) to 3 X 10(8) Hz mainly by the aid of the field-cycling technique. The comparison between H2O- and D2O-hydrated samples permitted the distinction of exchangeable and unexchangeable protons. In all cases the 14N1H cross-relaxation dips due mainly to the amide groups have been observed. In addition, in the case of the deuterium exchanged proteins a 2H1H quadrupole dip appears. The amide groups act as relaxation sinks due to the coupling of the amide proton to 14N and adjacent protons. Outside of the dip regions the proton-proton coupling dominates. The fluctuations of the 14N1H and 1H1H interactions are of a different type. The unexchangeable protons show a T1 dispersion outside of the quadrupole dip regions given by the exceptional power law T1 approximately v0.75 +/- 0.05. It is shown that apart from structural information of the 14N spectra, 14N1H cross-relaxation spectroscopy permits the determination of correlation times in the range 10(-7) s less than tau less than 10(-4)S.     

Phylogenetic analysis of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4.

Despite the ubiquity of histones in eukaryotes and their important role in determining the structure and function of chromatin, no detailed studies of the evolution of the histones have been reported. We have constructed phylogenetic trees for the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Histones which form dimers (H2A/H2B and H3/H4) have very similar trees and appear to have co-evolved, with the exception of the divergent sea urchin testis H2Bs, for which no corresponding divergent H2As have been identified. The trees for H2A and H2B also support the theory that animals and fungi have a common ancestor. H3 and H4 are 10-fold less divergent than H2A and H2B. Three evolutionary histories are observed for histone variants. H2A.F/Z-type variants arose once early in evolution, while H2A.X variants arose separately, during the evolution of multicellular animals. H3.3-type variants have arisen in multiple independent events.     

Regulation of H2a-specific proteolysis by the histone H3:H4 tetramer

We have studied the limited cleavage of H2a in the H2a:H2b histone dimer by the H2a-specific protease under physiological conditions (neutral pH, 0.1 M NaCl) using a variety of histone-DNA reconstitutes as substrates and/or regulators of the partially purified enzyme. Under these conditions the protease cleaves H2a in "native" dimer-DNA reconstitutes but not in "native" octamer-DNA reconstitutes. Treatment of the enzyme with saturating amounts of H3:H4 tetramer-DNA prior to addition of dimer-DNA substrate results in complete inhibition of H2a-specific proteolysis. Sucrose gradient sedimentation experiments indicate that the protease binds reversibly to tetramer-DNA and that this leads to the reversible inhibition of enzymatic activity. Using three different tetramer-DNA complexes, we found native tetramer-DNA to be a more effective inhibitor than either trypsin-treated tetramer-DNA or acetylated tetramer-DNA. We conclude that under physiological conditions, the H2a-specific protease binds primarily to the highly basic amino-terminal domain of the H3:H4 tetramer, and this binding lowers the effective concentration of enzyme available to cleave H2a. Although no cleaved H2a is produced when protease is mixed with native octamer-DNA, incubation of the enzyme with acetylated octamer-DNA results in H2a-specific proteolysis. This is the first demonstration that the H2a-specific protease activity can be modulated by a physiologically relevant process (e.g. histone acetylation). We propose that the sequestered protease may be functionally regulated in vivo through reversible post-translational modifications to the NH2-terminal domains of the histone H3:H4 tetramer.     

Distribution of the core histones H2A.H2B.H3 and H4 during cell replication.

The distribution of newly synthesized core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 relative to the DNA strand synthesized in the same generation has been examined in replicating Chinese Hamster ovary cells. Cells are grown for one generation in [14C]-lysine and thymidine, and then for one generation in [3H]-lysine and 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrUdRib) and a further generation in unlabeled lysine and thymidine. This protocol produces equal amounts of unifilarly substituted and unsubstituted DNA. Monomer nucleosomes isolated from chromatin containing these two types of DNA can be distinguished by crosslinking with formaldehyde and banding to equilibrium in CsCl density gradients. The results indicate that the core histones are equally distributed between the two types of DNA. These findings are discussed in terms of current models for chromatin replication; they do not support any long term association of newly replicated histones with either the leading or lagging side of the replication fork.     

Specific degradation of histones H1 and H3

It is shown that acid treated histones H1 and H3 are susceptible to specific degradation by an associated acid resistant protease. Dialysis against distilled water (pH 5.5–6) of the acid treated histones enhances proteolysis. On the other hand, no degradation is observed in nucleohistone either in the presence of Ca⁺⁺ or Na⁺⁺ ions. The conditions required to avoid degradation during nucleohistone and histone manipulation are described.     

Histone H1t is not replaced by H1.1 or H1.2 in pachytene spermatocytes or spermatids of H1t-deficient mice

The linker histone gene H1t is exclusively expressed in the mammalian testis. In former experiments we have shown that H1.1 and H1.2 histone gene expression is significantly enhanced in testis of adult H1t deficient mice. In this report we have quantified the mRNA of different H1 genes in 9-day- and 20-day-old wild type and H1t knock out mice. In addition, we have analysed the distribution of H1.1 and H1.2 protein by immunofluorescent staining in spread male germ cells. The aim of this work was to answer the question whether H1t can be replaced during spermatogenesis by H1.1 or H1.2. In our experiments we could not detect elevated levels of H1.1 or H1.2 in pachytene spermatocytes or haploid cells of H1t deficient testis. Therefore, in these cells, H1t seems not to be replaced by H1.1 or H1.2.     

Exchange of histones H1, H2A, and H2B in vivo

We have asked whether histones synthesized in the absence of DNA synthesis can exchange into nucleosomal structures. DNA synthesis was inhibited by incubating hepatoma tissue culture cells in medium containing 5.0 mM hydroxyurea for 40 min. During the final 20 min, the cells were pulsed with [3H]lysine to radiolabel the histones (all five histones are substantially labeled under these conditions). By two electrophoretic techniques, we demonstrate that histones H1, H2A, and H2B synthesized in the presence of hydroxyurea do not merely associate with the surface of the chromatin but instead exchange with preexisting histones so that for the latter two histones there is incorporation into nucleosome structures. On the other hand, H3 and H4 synthesized during this same time period appear to be only weakly bound, if at all, to chromatin. These two histones have been isolated from postnuclear washes and purified. Some possible implications of in vivo exchange are discussed.