The analysis of exchanges in tritium-labelled meiotic chromosomes

The autoradiographic analysis of exchanges in tritium-labelled meiotic chromosomes is potentially a useful approach to the study of meiotic exchange events since this method differentially labels meiotic chromatids along their entire length. The main problem encountered in earlier autoradiographic studies is that of distinguishing label exchanges generated at chiasmata from label exchanges generated by sister chromatid exchange. This problem was overcome in the present study by the choice of a meiotic system (male meiosis of Stethophyma grossum) where chiasmata are limited to just one proximally localised chiasma in each bivalent. This system allows the positive identification of chiasma-generated label exchanges and demonstrates convincingly the origin of chiasmata through breakage and rejoining of homologous non-sister chromatids. Sister chromatid exchanges are also readily detected in labelled meiotic chromosomes of this species, where they occur with a mean frequency of 0.35 per chromosome. This frequency is similar to that found in mitotic spermatogonial cells and the exchanges are randomly distributed both within and between chromosomes. These features of meiotic sister chromatid exchanges suggest that they are unrelated to non-sister chiasmatic exchanges and they probably have no special meiotic significance.     

Sister chromatid exchanges induced by light flashes to 5-bromodeoxyuridine- and 5-iododeoxyuridine substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes

Incorporation of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) or 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) into the chromosomal DNA of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells during two rounds of replication causes sister chromatids to be differentiated so that they can be discriminated from one another by staining and morphology. Chromatids that contain BUdR or IUdR in both DNA strands stain lighter and are less condensed than their sister chromatids with only unifilar substitution. The halogenated pyrimidine nucleosides also induce sister chromatid exchanges that can be detected without autoradiography. The frequency of these exchanges is markedly increased by exposing the cells to light flashes.     

Autoradiographic evidence of differential loss of BUdR-substituted DNA after UV exposure in FPG harlequin staining

Autoradiographic analysis of CHO cells labelled with [³H]TdR or [³H]BUdR shows that only [³H]BUdR label is removed from metaphase chromosomes after FPG staining. [³H]BUdR is differentially removed from the bifilary labelled chromatid (BB) compared with the unifilary labelled chromatid (TB). UV treatment alone removes the label and produces harlequin staining and if the UV step is omitted from the FPG staining technique no loss of label or harlequin staining occurs. The heat treatment step (60 °C in 2 × SSC) removes further label, reducing the ratio of grains BB/TB to 0.8:1.0 and improving the differential staining. Over-treatment with heat produces paler staining chromatids without altering this ratio. The differential loss of BUdR-substituted DNA through UV photolysis and extraction in solution appears to be the cause of the differential harlequin staining of chromatids in this technique.     

Random segregation of sister chromatids in developing chick retinal cells demonstrated in vivo using the fluorescence plus Giemsa technique

Experiments were designed to test whether nonrandom segregation of sister chromatids at mitosis has a role in the production of cell diversity during embryogenesis. Segregation was examined in vivo in retinal cells from embryonic chicks. Chromatids were labelled with bromouracil and stained by the fluorescence plus Giemsa technique. No evidence of nonrandom segregation was observed in a frequency distribution of pairs of bifilarly labelled sister chromatids at the third metaphase after the start of labelling. Nor was there evidence that chromatids from homologous chromosomes segregated nonrandomly. Nonrandom segregation is probably not a mechanism for cell diversification.     

Is isolabeling a false image?

Isolabeling in Chinese hamster chromosomes was studied by using a new method which enabled clear demarcation of sister chromatids without the usage of tritium label. The method involved continuous labeling of cells with 5-bromodeoxyuridine and staining of fixed chromosomes with acridine orange. Isolabeling was easily observed in chromosome preparations processed according to the conventional autoradiographic methods, especially in cells treated with ethyl methanesulphonate, and its frequency was dependent on the concentration of the drug. On the other hand, no isolabeling was detected in preparations made by the new method, but exchanges of short segments of sister chromatids were observed frequently, depending upon the concentration of ethyl methanesulphonate. These results strongly suggest that isolabeling observable in autoradiographs is a consequence of sister chromatid exchanges combined with image spread that attends autoradiography.     

Micromanipulation of chromosomes reveals that cohesion release during cell division is gradual and does not require tension

In mitosis, cohesion appears to be present along the entire length of the chromosome, between centromeres and along chromosome arms. By metaphase, sister chromatids appear as two adjacent but visibly distinct rods. Sister chromatids separate from one another in anaphase by releasing all chromosome cohesion. This is different from meiosis I, in which pairs of sister chromatids separate from one another, moving to each spindle pole by releasing cohesion only between sister chromatid arms. Then, in anaphase II, sister chromatids separate by releasing centromere cohesion. Our objective was to find where cohesion is present or absent on chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis and when and how it is released. We determined cohesion directly by pulling on chromosomes with two micromanipulation needles. Thus, we could distinguish for the first time between apparent doubleness as seen in the microscope and physical separability. We found that apparent doubleness can be deceiving: Visibly distinct sister chromatids often cannot be separated. We also demonstrated that cohesion is released gradually in anaphase, with chromosomes looking as if they were unzipped or pulled apart. This implied that tension from spindle forces was required, but we showed directly that no tension was necessary to pull chromatids apart.     

Differential fluorescence of sister chromatids with 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Differential fluorescence of sister chromatids and sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) in chromosomes from human lymphocytes grown two replication cycles in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine can be detected by fluorescence microscopy after staining with 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The DAPI fluorescence appears to be more stable than that of the dye 33258 Hoechst and may provide a more sensitive method for the detection of SCE.     

Minichromosome analysis of chromosome pairing, disjunction, and sister chromatid cohesion in maize

With the advent of engineered minichromosome technology in plants, an understanding of the properties of small chromosomes is desirable. Twenty-two minichromosomes of related origin but varying in size are described that provide a unique resource to study such behavior. Fourteen minichromosomes from this set could pair with each other in meiotic prophase at frequencies between 25 and 100%, but for the smaller chromosomes, the sister chromatids precociously separated in anaphase I. The other eight minichromosomes did not pair with themselves, and the sister chromatids divided equationally at meiosis I. In plants containing one minichromosome, the sister chromatids also separated at meiosis I. In anaphase II, the minichromosomes progressed to one pole or the other. The maize (Zea mays) Shugoshin protein, which has been hypothesized to protect centromere cohesion in meiosis I, is still present at anaphase I on minichromosomes that divide equationally. Also, there were no differences in the level of phosphorylation of Ser-10 of histone H3, a correlate of cohesion, in the minichromosomes in which sister chromatids separated during anaphase I compared with the normal chromosomes. These analyses suggest that meiotic centromeric cohesion is compromised in minichromosomes depending on their size and cannot be maintained by the mechanisms used by normal-sized chromosomes.     

Endomitosis in the mealy bug,Planococcus citri (Homoptera: Coccoidea)

Endomitosis in the Malpighian tubules of the mealy bug Planococcus citri (Risso) is described. The stages are identified on the basis of the length of the chromosomes and the distance between the sister chromatids or chromosomes. The appearance of the chromosomes in the various stages of endomitosis is compared to that in other hemipteran insects. During anaphase and telophase of endomitosis the ends of the sister chromatids and chromosomes tend to stay together longer than the other parts. It is suggested that in holokinetic chromosomes special regions for holding the chromatids together are concentrated near the ends of the chromosomes.Supported by grant GB1585 from the National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.     

THE STRUCTURE OF THE CENTROMERIC REGION OF CHO CHROMOSOMES

CHO chromosomes, prepared for fluorescence microscopy, or for scanning electron microscopy, sometimes show a splitting of the centromere proper into two sister centromeres, with a space between them, while the sister chromatids are joined in the most proximal regions of the chromosome arms. It is suggested that this might represent the final stage of chromatid splitting before the anaphase separation of chromatids.     

Comparing telomere length of sister chromatids in human lymphocytes using three-dimensional confocal microscopy

BACKGROUND: The length of the terminal sequences of linear chromosomes changes dynamically during cellular proliferation. A crucial element in the study of telomere-related regulation mechanisms is the ability to measure telomere lengths of individual chromosomes. Individual telomere lengths can be measured using digital imaging fluorescence microscopy-based techniques. We extended this method using confocal microscopy for the acquisition of three-dimensional (3D) images. Consequently, variations in measured signal intensities due to erroneous focusing are avoided. METHODS: We employed our 3D telomere sizing method to compare telomere lengths of sister chromatids within metaphase preparations from human lymphocytes. The samples were treated following a quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) protocol using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled telomeric peptidic nucleic acid (PNA) probes and propidium iodide (PI) counterstain. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the telomere lengths of two sister chromatids are not necessarily equal in human lymphocytes. Profound statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences in the distribution of the sister chromatid telomere lengths, but we were not able to prove a discrete distribution of telomere sister ratios. These telomere length differences were more apparent in older individuals. CONCLUSION: Whereas the majority of sister telomere pairs have equal lengths, surprisingly, a minority was significantly different in each individual studied. We are convinced that these observations are not linked to the methodology or the protocol applied. We suggest that a biological phenomenon might be involved.     

Involvement of sulfhydryl groups of chromosomal proteins in sister chromatid differentiation

The fluorescence of human lymphocyte chromosomes stained with sulfhydryl group-specific fluorochromes is markedly enhanced by a mild near-ultraviolet irradiation pretreatment, indicating breakage of protein disulfide bonds. When metaphase preparations of cells cultured in the presence of BrdU during two cell cycles are irradiated and subsequently stained with the sulfhydryl group-specific fluorescent reagents used in this study, a differential fluorescence of sister chromatids is observed. After staining with the DNA-specific fluorochrome DAPI an opposite pattern of lateral differentiation appears. It can be concluded that the chromatid containing bifilarly BrdU-substituted DNA has a higher content of sulfhydryl groups than the chromatid containing unifilarly BrdU-substituted DNA. This implies a more pronounced effect of breakage of disulfide bonds in the chromatid with the higher degree of BrdU-substitution. BrdU-containing chromosomes pretreated with the mild near-ultraviolet irradiation procedure used by us, do not show any differentiation of sister chromatids after Feulgen staining. Using sulfhydryl group-specific reagents, differential fluorescence of sister chromatids could still be induced by irradiation with near-ultraviolet light after the complete removal of DNA from the chromosomes by incubation with DNase I. Thus, the protein effect of irradiation of BrdU-containing chromosomes takes place independently of what occurs to DNA.Our results indicate that subsequent to the primary alteration of chromatin structure caused by the incorporation of BrdU into DNA, breakage of disulfide bonds of chromosomal proteins might play an important role in bringing about differential staining of sister chromatids, at least for those procedures that use irradiation as a pretreatment or prolonged illumination during microscopic examination.     

GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein–protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion

Background Precise control of sister chromatid separation is essential for the accurate transmission of genetic information. Sister chromatids must remain linked to each other from the time of DNA replication until the onset of chromosome segregation, when the linkage must be promptly dissolved. Recent studies suggest that the machinery that is responsible for the destruction of mitotic cyclins also degrades proteins that play a role in maintaining sister chromatid linkage, and that this machinery is regulated by the spindle-assembly checkpoint. Studies on these problems in budding yeast are hampered by the inability to resolve its chromosomes by light or electron microscopy.Results We have developed a novel method for visualizing specific DNA sequences in fixed and living budding yeast cells. A tandem array of 256 copies of the Lac operator is integrated at the desired site in the genome and detected by the binding of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)–Lac repressor fusion expressed from the HIS3 promoter. Using this method, we show that sister chromatid segregation precedes the destruction of cyclin B. In mad or bub cells, which lack the spindle-assembly checkpoint, sister chromatid separation can occur in the absence of microtubules. The expression of a tetramerizing form of the GFP–Lac repressor, which can bind Lac operators on two different DNA molecules, can hold sister chromatids together under conditions in which they would normally separate.Conclusions We conclude that sister chromatid separation in budding yeast can occur in the absence of microtubule-dependent forces, and that protein complexes that can bind two different DNA molecules are capable of holding sister chromatids together.     

Mouse satellite DNA, centromere structure, and sister chromatid pairing

The experiments described were directed toward understanding relationships between mouse satellite DNA, sister chromatid pairing, and centromere function. Electron microscopy of a large mouse L929 marker chromosome shows that each of its multiple constrictions is coincident with a site of sister chromatid contact and the presence of mouse satellite DNA. However, only one of these sites, the central one, possesses kinetochores. This observation suggests either that satellite DNA alone is not sufficient for kinetochore formation or that when one kinetochore forms, other potential sites are suppressed. In the second set of experiments, we show that highly extended chromosomes from Hoechst 33258-treated cells (Hilwig, I., and A. Gropp, 1973, Exp. Cell Res., 81:474-477) lack kinetochores. Kinetochores are not seen in Miller spreads of these chromosomes, and at least one kinetochore antigen is not associated with these chromosomes when they were subjected to immunofluorescent analysis using anti-kinetochore scleroderma serum. These data suggest that kinetochore formation at centromeric heterochromatin may require a higher order chromatin structure which is altered by Hoechst binding. Finally, when metaphase chromosomes are subjected to digestion by restriction enzymes that degrade the bulk of mouse satellite DNA, contact between sister chromatids appears to be disrupted. Electron microscopy of digested chromosomes shows that there is a significant loss of heterochromatin between the sister chromatids at paired sites. In addition, fluorescence microscopy using anti-kinetochore serum reveals a greater inter-kinetochore distance than in controls or chromosomes digested with enzymes that spare satellite. We conclude that the presence of mouse satellite DNA in these regions is necessary for maintenance of contact between the sister chromatids of mouse mitotic chromosomes.     

Human Wapl is a cohesin-binding protein that promotes sister-chromatid resolution in mitotic prophase

BACKGROUND: The linkage between duplicated chromosomes (sister chromatids) is established during S phase by the action of cohesin, a multisubunit complex conserved from yeast to humans. Most cohesin dissociates from chromosome arms when the cell enters mitotic prophase, leading to the formation of metaphase chromosomes with two cytologically discernible chromatids. This process is known as sister-chromatid resolution. Although two mitotic kinases have been implicated in this process, it remains unknown exactly how the cohesin-mediated linkage is destabilized at a mechanistic level. RESULTS: The wings apart-like (Wapl) protein was originally identified as a gene product that potentially regulates heterochromatin organization in Drosophila melanogaster. We show that the human ortholog of Wapl is a cohesin-binding protein that facilitates cohesin's timely release from chromosome arms during prophase. Depletion of Wapl from HeLa cells causes transient accumulation of prometaphase-like cells with chromosomes that display poorly resolved sister chromatids with a high level of cohesin. Reduction of cohesin relieves the Wapl-depletion phenotype, and depletion of Wapl rescues premature sister separation observed in Sgo1-depleted or Esco2-depleted cells. Conversely, overexpression of Wapl causes premature separation of sister chromatids. Wapl physically associates with cohesin in HeLa-cell nuclear extracts. Remarkably, in vitro reconstitution experiments demonstrate that Wapl forms a stoichiometric, ternary complex with two regulatory subunits of cohesin, implicating its noncatalytic function in inactivating cohesin's ability to interact with chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: Wapl is a new regulator of sister chromatid resolution and promotes release of cohesin from chromosomes by directly interacting with its regulatory subunits.     

Extracentromeric connections between sister chromatids demonstrated in human chromosomes induced to condense asymmetrically

Summary Extracentromeric chromatin fibers were proposed to hold sister chromatids together in mitotic chromosomes examined by electron microscopy, but their existence in living cells has not been demonstrated yet. We have performed an in vitro BrdU-H33258 treatment which induced a differential rate of condensation to each sister chromatid, thus producing asymmetrically condensing chromosomes. The fast condensing chromatid pulled the slower sister one, both bending in parallel. Bent chromatids appeared reciprocally connected by loops of chromatin fibers, suggesting they were the links which permitted the physical interplay between the differently condensing chromatids. When sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) intercalated a fast-condensing fragment in the slow-condensing chromatid or vice versa, the chromosome inverted its curvature at the SCE-point.     

Sister chromatid exchanges in isolabeling

Isolabeling observed by autoradiography in sister chromatids at the second or later metaphases after incorporation of ³H-thymidine has sometimes been ascribed to an exchange between the multiple DNA duplexes in polynemic sister chromatids. An analysis reported here on the frequency and size of isolabeled regions in chromosomes of the rat kangaroo shows that all isolabeling can be accounted for by sister chromatid exchanges coupled with the image spread that can occur in tritium autoradiographs. Hence, in this case it becomes unnecessary to postulate binemy or polynemy to explain isolabeling.     

The role of secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) in biological microanalysis: technique comparisons and prospects.

The virtues and limitations of SIMS ion microscopy are compared with other spectroscopic techniques applicable to biological microanalysis, with a special emphasis on techniques for elemental localization in biological tissue (electron, X-ray, laser, nuclear, ion microprobes). Principal advantages of SIMS include high detection sensitivity, high depth resolution, isotope specificity, and possibilities for three-dimensional imaging. Current limitations, especially in comparison to X-ray microanalysis, center on lateral spatial resolution and quantification. Recent SIMS instrumentation advances involving field emission liquid metal ion sources and laser post-ionization will help to minimize these limitations in the future. The molecular surface analysis capabilities of static SIMS, especially with the new developments in commercial time-of-flight spectrometers, are promising for application to biomimetic, biomaterials, and biological tissue or cell surfaces. However, the direct microchemical imaging of biomolecules in tissue samples using SIMS will be hindered by limited concentrations, small analytical volumes, and the inefficiencies of converting surface molecules to structurally significant gas phase ions. Indirect detection using elemental or isotopically tagged molecules, however, shows considerable promise for molecular imaging studies using SIMS ion microscopy.     

Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids induced by Hoechst plus black light and endonuclease

A differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids was obtained by treating chromosomes replicated twice in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) with Hoechst 33258 plus black light at 55 degrees C (HB pretreatment) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) I, II, or micrococcal nuclease. In this staining pattern the BrdU bifilarly substituted chromatids were darkly and the unifilarly substituted chromatids lightly stained. This staining pattern was obtained only by staining the HB-DNase I-treated chromosomes with Giemsa and methylene blue, not by several other dyes tested. Relatively more DNA labelling was removed from the non-BrdU-substituted than the BrdU-substituted chromosomes, when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were digested with DNase I. But the protein labelling was not removed appreciably in the same treatment. The differential DNase I sensitivity between the non-BrdU-substituted and BrdU-substituted chromosomes disappeared when the HB-pretreated chromosomes were incubated with proteinase K before The DNase I digestion. Moreover, no differential DNase I sensitivity was found between the HB-pretreated isolated DNA containing and not containing BrdU. We propose that during the HB pretreatment, more DNA-protein cross-linkings are induced in BrdU bifilarly substituted than the unifilarly substituted chromatids. This structure protects the chromosomal DNA against the DNase I digestion. Thus, a reverse differential Giemsa staining between sister chromatids is obtained by the HB-DNase I treatment.     

Aurora controls sister kinetochore mono-orientation and homolog bi-orientation in meiosis-I

Aurora-B kinases are important regulators of mitotic chromosome segregation, where they are required for the faithful bi-orientation of sister chromatids. In contrast to mitosis, sister chromatids have to be oriented toward the same spindle pole in meiosis-I, while homologous chromosomes are bi-oriented. We find that the fission yeast Aurora kinase Ark1 is required for the faithful bi-orientation of sister chromatids in mitosis and of homologous chromosomes in meiosis-I. Unexpectedly, Ark1 is also necessary for the faithful mono-orientation of sister chromatids in meiosis-I, even though the canonical mono-orientation pathway, which depends on Moa1 and Rec8, seems intact. Our data suggest that Ark1 prevents unified sister kinetochores during metaphase-I from merotelic attachment to both spindle poles and thus from being torn apart during anaphase-I, revealing a novel mechanism promoting monopolar attachment. Furthermore, our results provide an explanation for the previously enigmatic observation that fission yeast Shugoshin Sgo2, which assists in loading Aurora to centromeres, and its regulator Bub1 are required for the mono-orientation of sister chromatids in meiosis-I.