Presurgical (neoadjuvant) endocrine therapy is a useful model to predict response and outcome to endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients

Endocrine therapy of breast cancer has been improved continuously during the last decades. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are dominating treatment algorithms for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer while tamoxifen still is the most widely used drug for premenopausal women. Several research tools and study designs have been used to challenge established drugs and develop the field of antihormonal therapy. One pivotal study option has been the observation of clinical responses during presurgical/neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (PSET/NET). This strategy has several major advantages. First, the breast tumor, still present in the patient's breast during therapy, can be followed by clinical observations and radiological measurements and any treatment effect will be immediately registered. Second, tumor biopsies may be obtained before initiation and following therapy allowing intra-patient comparisons. These tumor-biopsies may be used for the evaluation of intra-tumor changes associated with drug treatment. As examples, presurgical breast cancer trials have been used to evaluate intra-tumor estrogen levels during therapy with aromatase inhibitors and also to study mechanisms involved in the adaptation processes to estrogen suppression. Biomarker studies have provided information that may be used for patient selection in the future. Finally, recently published results from presurgical trials testing combinations of classical endocrine drugs and novel targeted therapies have produced promising results.     

Signaling pathways in breast cancer: Therapeutic targeting of the microenvironment

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Understanding the biology of this malignant disease is a prerequisite for selecting an appropriate treatment. Cell cycle alterations are seen in many cancers, including breast cancer. Newly popular targeted agents in breast cancer include cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) which are agents inhibiting the function of cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and agents targeting proto-oncogenic signaling pathways like Notch, Wnt, and SHH (Sonic hedgehog). CDKIs are categorized as selective and non-selective inhibitors of CDK. CDKIs have been tried as monotherapy and combination therapy. The CDKI Palbocyclib is now a promising therapeutic in breast cancer. This drug recently entered phase III trial for estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer after showing encouraging results in progression free survival in a phase II trials.The tumor microenvironment is now recognized as a significant factor in cancer treatment response. The tumor microenvironment is increasingly considered as a target for combination therapy of breast cancer. Recent findings in the signaling pathways in breast cancer are herein summarized and discussed. Furthermore, the therapeutic targeting of the microenvironment in breast cancer is also considered.     

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: role of mutational analysis in anti-cancer targeted therapy

The goal of cancer pharmacogenomics is to obtain benefit from personalized approaches of cancer treatment and prevention. Recent advances in genomic research have shed light on the crucial role of genetic variants, mainly involving genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters and targets, in driving different treatment responses among individuals, in terms of therapeutic efficacy and safety. Although a considerable amount of new targeted agents have been designed based on a finely understanding of molecular alterations in cancer, a wide gap between pharmacogenomic knowledge and clinical application still persists. This review focuses on the relevance of mutational analyses in predicting individual response to antitumor therapy, in order to improve the translational impact of genetic information on clinical practice.     

Pharmacogenomics of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors

The EGFR is a validated anticancer target whose successful exploitation has added novel agents to our current treatment protocols. Subsets of patients have shown to benefit the most from these therapies, and though these differential responses have yet to be completely defined, they are mostly of genetic nature. Egfr amplifications have shown to increase sensitivity to both small molecule inhibitors and specific monoclonal antibodies targeting the EGFR. A somatic/germline egfr intron 1 CA repeat sequence polymorphism has shown to have an important role in the control of EGFR protein expression, and has been linked to an increased risk of familial breast cancer, a worse outcome in patients with colorectal cancer, and anti-EGFR treatment efficacy in preclinical models. Egfr activating mutations have been recently described in lung cancer linking a cluster of genotypes with sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase pharmacological inhibition. Despite the initial excitement that this discovery elicited, follow-up reports have not unequivocally confirmed this finding, and these drugs have been solidly efficacious both in individual patients and in diseases generally lacking egfr mutations such as pancreas cancer. We are witnessing exciting developments in the field of the pharmacogenomics of cancer, and this has particularly evolved in the area pertaining EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This review will discuss the background and currently available preclinical and clinical data.     

Breast cancer 2004: Progress and promise on the clinical front

Carcinoma of the breast is the most common cancer in u.s. women (excluding skin cancer), and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In 2004, it is estimated that 215,000 u.s. women will develop invasive breast cancer, and 40,000 women will die of the disease. Advancing age and female sex are the two greatest risk factors for the development of breast cancer, although family history, reproductive and hormonal history, lifestyle and environmental factors all contribute to risk. Models are available to help estimate risk of developing breast cancer in individual patients. Inherited mutations, specifically in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for approximately 5–10% of all breast cancer cases. Significant advances have recently been made in both the primary prevention of breast cancer (including chemoprevention), and secondary prevention (early detection through breast imaging). Breast mri as a tool for screening high risk women is a particularly exciting new tool.When breast cancer is diagnosed, optimal treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach, including surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapies. In the field of breast surgery, breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy techniques have allowed substantially decreased surgery in appropriated selected patients with corresponding decreases in complication rates and long-term sequelae. Radiation oncologists are comparing partial breast irradiation versus conventional whole breast radiation in an attempt to minimize toxicity and treatment time, and maximize efficacy. The field of breast medical oncology has evolved at a rapid pace in the past decade, with numerous new hormonal agents, chemotherapeutic agents, and biologically targeted therapies in clinical use and under investigation. The addition of ‘adjuvant’ systemic therapy to the treatment of early stage breast cancer patients has dramatically reduced relapse and death rates. Unfortunately, metastatic recurrence still occurs. Once the cancer has spread beyond the breast and locoregional nodal areas it is felt to be incurable, although still treatable. A better understanding of breast cancer biology has led to the development of a host of new biologically targeted agents, many of which hold substantial promise for improving quality of life and survival rates in metastatic breast cancer patients.     

Effect of Ras Inhibition in Hematopoiesis and BCR/ABL Leukemogenesis

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common female cancer and the second most common cause of female cancer-related deaths in the United States. World-wide, more than one million women will be diagnosed with breast cancer annually. In 2007, more than 175,000 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in the United States. However, deaths due to breast cancer have decreased in the recent years in part because of improved screening techniques, surgical interventions, understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease, and utilization of traditional chemotherapies in a more efficacious manner. One of the more exciting areas of improvement in the treatment of breast cancer is the entrance of novel therapies now available to oncologists. In the field of cancer therapeutics, the area of targeted and biologic therapies has been progressing at a rapid rate, particularly in the treatment of breast cancer. Since the advent of imatinib for the successful treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia in the 2001, clinicians have been searching for comparable therapies that could be as efficacious and as tolerable. In order for targeted therapies to be effective, the agent must be able to inhibit critical regulatory pathways which promote tumor cell growth and proliferation. The targets must be identifiable, quantifiable and capable of being interrupted. In the field of breast cancer, two advances in targeted therapy have led to great strides in the understanding and treatment of breast cancer, namely hormonal therapy for estrogen positive receptor breast cancer and antibodies directed towards the inhibition of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2. These advances have revolutionized the understanding and the treatment strategies for breast cancer. Building upon these successes, a host of novel agents are currently being investigated and used in clinical trials that will hopefully prove to be as fruitful. This review will focus on novel therapies in the field of breast cancer with a focus on metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and updates from the recent annual ASCO meeting and contains a summary of the results.     

Promising therapeutic options in triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a greater risk of recurrence despite more aggressive therapy even in lowrisk category. TNBC is high grade, hormone receptor and HER-2 negative, it exhibits a high level of Ki-67 staining and expresses the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). Because of its expression profile, treatment options are limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Molecular defects that give rise to BRCA1-associated breast cancer also occur in TNBC. Thus, the combination of poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with drugs that cause DNA breakages, such as alkylating agents and topoisomerase I inhibitors, could theoretically potentiate the efficacy of each drug in patients with TNBC. Clinical trials with various targeted approaches alone or in combination with different chemotherapeutic agents are currently underway. In this review, current and future treatment approaches in TNBC with novel targeted agents are discussed.     

Cell‐specific biomarkers and targeted biopharmaceuticals for breast cancer treatment

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among women, and its related treatment has been attracting significant attention over the past decades. Among the various treatments, targeted therapy has shown great promise as a precision treatment, by binding to cancer cell‐specific biomarkers. So far, great achievements have been made in targeted therapy of breast cancer. In this review, we first discuss cell‐specific biomarkers, which are not only useful for classification of breast cancer subtyping but also can be utilized as goals for targeted therapy. Then, the innovative and generic‐targeted biopharmaceuticals for breast cancer, including monoclonal antibodies, non‐antibody proteins and small molecule drugs, are reviewed. Finally, we provide our outlook on future developments of biopharmaceuticals, and provide solutions to problems in this field.     

Targeted therapies in epithelial ovarian cancer: Molecular mechanisms of action

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death in women with gynecological cancer. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and have a poor prognosis. Currently, surgical tumor debulking, followed by platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. However, these patients are at great risk of recurrence and emerging drug resistance. Therefore, novel treatment strategies are required to improve outcomes for women with advanced ovarian cancer. A variety of molecular targeted agents, the majority of which are monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule protein-kinase inhibitors, have been explored in the management of ovarian cancer. The targets of these agents include angiogenesis, the human epidermal growth factor receptor family, ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, epigenetic modulators, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, which are aberrant in tumor tissue. The antiangiogenic agent, bevacizumab, has been reported as the most effective targeted agent and should be included in the standard chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced ovarian cancer. PARP inhibitors, which are mainly used in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene-mutated patients, and mTOR inhibitors are also attractive treatment strategies, either alone or combination with chemotherapy, for ovarian cancer. Understanding the tumor molecular biology and identification of predictive biomarkers are essential steps for selection of the best treatment strategies. This article reviews the molecular mechanisms of the most promising targeted agents that are under early phase clinical evaluation for ovarian cancer.     

A summary of second-line randomized studies of aromatase inhibitors

The new generation of selective aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) offer a significant efficacy and safety advantage over both older agents in this class (aminoglutethimide) and the progestins (megestrol acetate (MA)), as second-line treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-dependent breast cancer who have failed on tamoxifen therapy. Exemestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to have activity after failure with the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole, and could be used as third-line treatment. Although the newer aromatase inhibitors belong to the same class and appear, from indirect comparisons, to have similar efficacy compared with the older therapies, they have different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, suggesting the potential for clinical differences. Compared with exemestane and letrozole, anastrozole shows greater selectivity for aromatase, as it lacks any evidence of an effect on adrenal steroidogenesis and has no androgenic effects. Therefore, it is clear that these agents should not be considered to be similar in all respects. In summary, the introduction of the aromatase inhibitors represents a significant step forward in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Studies in the adjuvant setting will ultimately determine whether the differences in pharmacokinetics and phamacodynamics will be of clinical relevance.     

Managing Bone Health in Breast Cancer

ObjectiveOsteoporosis is a common condition that can be caused or exacerbated by estrogen deficiency.MethodsThis narrative review will discuss optimizing bone health in the setting of adjuvant endocrine treatments for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer and the current use of antiresorptive agents as adjuvant therapy and as bone modifying agents.ResultsAdjuvant endocrine treatments for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors) affect bone health. The exact effect depends on the agent used and the menopausal state of the woman. Antiresorptive medications for osteoporosis, bisphosphonates and denosumab, lower the risk of bone loss from aromatase inhibitors. Use of bisphosphonates as adjuvant treatment in breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status, is increasing because of benefits seen to cancer relapse and survival.ConclusionOptimizing bone health in women with breast cancer during and after cancer treatment is informed by an understanding of breast cancer treatment and its skeletal effect.     

Fundamental research leading to improved endocrine therapy for breast cancer

Whilst endocrine therapy has a long-established role in the management of patients with advanced breast cancer, current therapies produce remission in, at best, only between 30 and 40% of cases. The most efficient use of hormonal measures therefore requires the accurate identification of individuals with hormone-responsive tumours. Oestrogen receptor measurements are useful but not fully discriminatory and additional predictive factors are required. Markers, such as specific hormonally induced proteins and mRNA, and antagonistic systems, such as epidermal growth factor receptors and cyclic AMP binding proteins are currently being evaluated. In terms of therapy, surgical manoeuvres such as adrenalectomy and hypophysectomy have already been replaced by the medical administration of anti-oestrogens, progestogens and drug regimes such as aminoglutethimide-hydrocortisone. Although castration by surgery or radiation remains the first-line treatment in premenopausal women with advanced disease, the advent of depot preparations of LHRH agonists offers the opportunity of performing medical ovariectomies which have the added advantage of being reversible. As a result of laboratory studies, more potent anti-oestrogens and more specific "suicide" aromatase inhibitors are entering into clinical practice. These can be expected to increase efficacy of treatment whilst reducing its side-effects. Research using cell-lines of human breast cancer also suggests that anti-progestins and agents capable of antagonizing steroid-induced growth factors will inhibit tumour growth. Such novel therapies potentially could make a major impact in the endocrine management of breast cancer. Lastly, although the primary management of early breast cancer predominantly involves non-hormonal modalities, clinical trials are now providing evidence of survival benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. The knowledge accrued from the use of newer endocrine agents in advanced cancer could therefore ultimately be relevant to the treatment of earlier stages of the disease.     

Development and evolution of therapies targeted to the estrogen receptor for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

This article describes the origins and evolution of "antiestrogenic" medicines for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Developing drugs that target the estrogen receptor (ER) either directly (tamoxifen) or indirectly (aromatase inhibitors) has improved the prognosis of breast cancer and significantly advanced healthcare. The development of the principles for treatment and the success of the concept, in practice, has become a model for molecular medicine and presaged the current testing of numerous targeted therapies for all forms of cancer. The translational research with tamoxifen to target the ER with the appropriate duration (5 years) of adjuvant therapy has contributed to the falling national death rates from breast cancer. Additionally, exploration of the endocrine pharmacology of tamoxifen and related nonsteroidal antiestrogen (e.g. keoxifene now known as raloxifene) resulted in the laboratory recognition of selective ER modulation and the translation of the concept to use raloxifene for the prevention of osteoporosis and breast cancer. However, the extensive evaluation of tamoxifen treatment revealed small but significant side effects such as endometrial cancer, blood clots and the development of acquired resistance. The solution was to develop drugs that targeted the aromatase enzyme specifically to prevent the conversion of androstenedione to estrone and subsequently estradiol. The successful translational research with the suicide inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (known as formestane) pioneered the development of a range of oral aromatase inhibitors that are either suicide inhibitors (exemestane) or competitive inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole) of the aromatase enzyme. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors is proving effective and is associated with reduction in the incidence of endometrial cancer and blood clots when compared with tamoxifen and there is also limited cross resistance so treatment can be sequential. Current clinical trials are addressing the value of aromatase inhibitors as chemopreventive agents for postmenopausal women.     

Recent advances in the clinical application of aromatase inhibitors

Aromatase inhibitors have evolved over a period of 20 years to well tolerated agents that can effectively obliterate aromatase activity in postmenopausal women. Breast cancer is the predominant clinical application and here the newer agents have established themselves as the preferred second-line agent after tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced disease. Recent data indicate that they be more efficacious than tamoxifen and, therefore, may replace it as the first-line agent of choice in the near future. On-going clinical trials in the adjuvant setting and prospective prevention studies will elucidate whether these drugs have a yet greater role in breast cancer.     

转移性结直肠癌抗血管生成靶向治疗的研究进展

近年来,由于各种新的化疗药物及分子靶向药物的使用,转移性结直肠癌(metastatic colorectal cancer,m CRC)的个体化治疗逐步取得了重要的成果。研究表明,抗血管生成靶向药物与化疗药物的联合使用作为转移性结直肠癌的一线治疗方案,可明显改善治疗效果,延长患者的生存时间。血管内皮生长因子(vascularendothelial growth factor,VEGF)是肿瘤血管生成过程中最主要的因子。贝伐单抗是通过基因工程技术得到的针对血管内皮生长因子-A(VEGF-A)的单克隆抗体,作为抗血管生成靶向药物用于转移性结直肠癌的临床治疗。本文对近年来转移性结直肠癌的抗血管生成靶向治疗,尤其是贝伐单抗治疗的相关研究进展进行综述并展望未来抗血管生成靶向治疗的发展前景。     

Progress of molecular targeted therapies for prostate cancers

Prostate cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in the United States. The current standard of care consists of prostatectomy and radiation therapy, which may often be supplemented with hormonal therapies. Recurrence is common, and many develop metastatic prostate cancer for which chemotherapy is only moderately effective. It is clear that novel therapies are needed for the treatment of the malignant forms of prostate cancer that recur after initial therapies, such as hormone refractory (HRPC) or castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). With advances in understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cancer, we have witnessed unprecedented progress in developing new forms of targeted therapy. Several targeted therapeutic agents have been developed and clinically used for the treatment of solid tumors such as breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cancer. Some of these reagents modulate growth factors and/or their receptors, which are abundant in cancer cells. Other reagents target the downstream signal transduction, survival pathways, and angiogenesis pathways that are abnormally activated in transformed cells or metastatic tumors. We will review current developments in this field, focusing specifically on treatments that can be applied to prostate cancers. Finally we will describe aspects of the future direction of the field with respect to discovering biomarkers to aid in identifying responsive prostate cancer patients.     

Progress of molecular targeted therapies for prostate cancers

Prostate cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men in the United States. The current standard of care consists of prostatectomy and radiation therapy, which may often be supplemented with hormonal therapies. Recurrence is common, and many develop metastatic prostate cancer for which chemotherapy is only moderately effective. It is clear that novel therapies are needed for the treatment of the malignant forms of prostate cancer that recur after initial therapies, such as hormone refractory (HRPC) or castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). With advances in understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cancer, we have witnessed unprecedented progress in developing new forms of targeted therapy. Several targeted therapeutic agents have been developed and clinically used for the treatment of solid tumors such as breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cancer. Some of these reagents modulate growth factors and/or their receptors, which are abundant in cancer cells. Other reagents target the downstream signal transduction, survival pathways, and angiogenesis pathways that are abnormally activated in transformed cells or metastatic tumors. We will review current developments in this field, focusing specifically on treatments that can be applied to prostate cancers. Finally we will describe aspects of the future direction of the field with respect to discovering biomarkers to aid in identifying responsive prostate cancer patients.     

Radiotracer breast cancer imaging: Beyond FDG and MIBI

Radiotracer imaging with MIBI and FDG have shown the benefit of the functional imaging of breast cancer. Newer radiopharmaceuticals targeted to particular aspects of breast cancer biology will likely play an important role in directing more specific and individualized breast cancer treatment. Future studies will need to test the ability of SPECT and PET imaging to detect breast cancer, but also to assess target expression, identify resistance factors, and measure early response to treatment. This will require protocols designed to test the predictive capability of imaging in the setting of a therapy trial, a new paradigm for breast cancer imaging, for which radiotracer imaging is ideally suited.     

An integrated view of aromatase and its inhibition

Aromatase inhibition has become a major treatment strategy for postmenopausal women with oestrogen-dependent breast cancer. Its optimal application is, however, dependent upon (i) the accurate identification of cancers which are ultimately dependent upon the activity of the aromatase enzyme, (ii) the use of the best method/inhibitor by which to blockade aromatase activity.

The single best predictor of response to aromatase inhibitors is the presence of tumour oestrogen receptors; receptor-negative cancers rarely respond whereas those with high levels seem particularly likely to benefit. However, there is a need for additional discriminatory markers. The use of microarray technology coupled with neoadjuvant therapy is likely to yield promising candidate genes. The finding that, amongst peripheral tissues, the tumour itself may have high activity has led to the suggestion that the tumour aromatase measurements may be predictive; however, in situ studies and the lack of robust assays for tumour aromatase suggest that tumour aromatase may not be an influential marker.

Whilst drugs such as anastrozole, exemestane, formestane and letrozole are all effective and specific inhibitors of aromatase, they differ in structure, potency and mechanism of action. Thus, differential sensitivity of tissues/tumours and non-cross resistance mean inhibitors are not equivalent and individual agents may have differing roles according to the setting in which they will be used. Aromatase inhibitors have evolved as key endocrine agents in the treatment of breast cancer. They offer the promise of rational treatment management based on the accurate identification of individual cohorts of tumours responsive to specific drugs.     

药物基因组学对癌症化疗的启示

药物基因组学的研究任务是阐明个体差异的遗传基础,并利用这些遗传信息来预测药物的疗效、毒性和安全性。绝大多数的癌症化疗药物在治疗效果及正常组织毒性上的个体差异一直广为关注。不仅诸多临床因素(如年龄、性别、饮食、药物相互作用等)与药物反应和治疗效果有关,而且药物分布(转运和代谢)和药物靶标的遗传变异同样可导致癌症治疗上的差异。本篇综述主要讨论当前和将来药物基因组学在临床癌症治疗和抗癌药物研制方面的应用。