Strand breaks without DNA rearrangement in V (D)J recombination.

Somatic gene rearrangement of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes [V(D)J recombination] is mediated by pairs of specific DNA sequence motifs termed signal sequences. In experiments described here, retroviral vectors containing V(D)J rearrangement cassettes in which the signal sequences had been altered were introduced into wild-type and scid (severe combined immune deficiency) pre-B cells and used to define intermediates in the V(D)J recombination pathway. The scid mutation has previously been shown to deleteriously affect the V(D)J recombination process. Cassettes containing a point mutation in one of the two signal sequences inhibited rearrangement in wild-type cells. In contrast, scid cells continued to rearrange these cassettes with the characteristic scid deletional phenotype. Using these mutated templates, we identified junctional modifications at the wild-type signal sequences that had arisen from strand breaks which were not associated with overall V(D)J rearrangements. Neither cell type was able to rearrange constructs which contained only a single, nonmutated, signal sequence. In addition, scid and wild-type cell lines harboring cassettes with mutations in both signal sequences did not undergo rearrangement, suggesting that at least one functional signal sequence was required for all types of V(D)J recombination events. Analysis of these signal sequence mutations has provided insights into intermediates in the V(D)J rearrangement pathway in wild-type and scid pre-B cells.     

V(D)J recombination: site-specific cleavage and repair

V(D)J recombination is a site-specific gene rearrangement process that contributes to the diversity of antigen receptor repertoires. Two lymphoid-specific proteins, RAG1 and RAG2, initiate this process at two recombination signal sequences. Due to the recent development of an in vitro assay for V(D)J cleavage, the mechanism of cleavage has been elucidated clearly. The RAG complex recognizes a recombination signal sequence, makes a nick at the border between signal and coding sequence, and carries out a transesterification reaction, resulting in the production of a hairpin structure at the coding sequence and DNA double-strand breaks at the signal ends. RAG1 possesses the active site of the V(D)J recombinase although RAG2 is essential for signal binding and cleavage. After DNA cleavage by the RAG complex, the broken DNA ends are rejoined by the coordinated action of DNA double-strand break repair proteins as well as the RAG complex. The junctional variability resulting from imprecise joining of the coding sequences contributes additional diversity to the antigen receptors.     

A DNA end-binding factor involved in double-strand break repair and V(D)J recombination.

We have identified a nuclear factor that binds to double-stranded DNA ends, independently of the structure of the ends. It had equivalent affinities for DNA ends created by sonication or by restriction enzymes leaving 5', 3', or blunt ends but had no detectable affinity for single-stranded DNA ends. Since X rays induce DNA double-strand breaks, extracts from several complementation groups of X-ray-sensitive mammalian cells were tested for this DNA end-binding (DEB) activity. DEB activity was deficient in three independently derived cell lines from complementation group 5. Furthermore, when the cell lines reverted to X-ray resistance, expression of the DEB factor was restored to normal levels. Previous studies had shown that group 5 cells are defective for both double-strand break repair and V(D)J recombination. The residual V(D)J recombination activity in these cells produces abnormally large deletions at the sites of DNA joining (F. Pergola, M. Z. Zdzienicka, and M. R. Lieber, Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:3464-3471, 1993, and G. Taccioli, G. Rathbun, E. Oltz, T. Stamato, P. Jeggo, and F. Alt, Science 260:207-210, 1993), consistent with deficiency of a factor that protects DNA ends from degradation. Therefore, DEB factor may be involved in a biochemical pathway common to both double-strand break repair and V(D)J recombination.     

TopBP1 deficiency impairs V(D)J recombination during lymphocyte development

TopBP1 was initially identified as a topoisomerase II‐β‐binding protein and it plays roles in DNA replication and repair. We found that TopBP1 is expressed at high levels in lymphoid tissues and is essential for early lymphocyte development. Specific abrogation of TopBP1 expression resulted in transitional blocks during early lymphocyte development. These defects were, in major part, due to aberrant V(D)J rearrangements in pro‐B cells, double‐negative and double‐positive thymocytes. We also show that TopBP1 was located at sites of V(D)J rearrangement. In TopBP1‐deficient cells, γ‐H2AX foci were found to be increased. In addition, greater amount of γ‐H2AX product was precipitated from the regions where TopBP1 was localized than from controls, indicating that TopBP1 deficiency results in inefficient DNA double‐strand break repair. The developmental defects were rescued by introducing functional TCR αβ transgenes. Our data demonstrate a novel role for TopBP1 as a crucial factor in V(D)J rearrangement during the development of B, T and iNKT cells.     

V(D)J recombination in mammalian cell mutants defective in DNA double-strand break repair.

V(D)J recombination has been examined in several X-ray-sensitive and double-strand break repair-deficient Chinese hamster cell mutants. Signal joint formation was affected in four mutants (xrs 5, XR-1, V-3, and XR-V9B cells, representing complementation groups 1 through 4, respectively) defective in DNA double-strand break rejoining. Among these four, V-3 and XR-V9B were the most severely affected. Only in V-3 was coding joint formation also affected. Ataxia telangiectasia-like hamster cell mutants (V-E5 and V-G8), which are normal for double-strand break repair but are X ray sensitive, were normal for all aspects of the V(D)J recombination reaction, indicating that X-ray sensitivity is not the common denominator but that the deficiency in double-strand break repair appears to be. The abnormality at the signal joints consisted of an elevated incidence of nucleotide loss from each of the two signal ends. Interestingly, in complementation groups 1 (xrs 5) and 2 (XR-1), signal joint formation was within the normal range under some transfection conditions. This suggests that the affected gene products in these two complementation groups are not catalytic components. Instead, they may be either secondary or stochiometric components involved in the later stages of both the V(D)J recombination reaction and double-strand break repair. The fact that such factors can affect the precision of the signal joint has mechanistic implications for V(D)J recombination.     

Intermolecular V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination plays a prominent role in the generation of the antigen receptor repertoires of B and T lymphocytes. It is also likely to be involved in the formation of chromosomal translocations, some of which may result from interchromosomal recombination. We have investigated the potential of the V(D)J recombination machinery to perform intermolecular recombination between two plasmids, either unlinked or linked by catenation. In either case, recombination occurs in trans to yield signal and coding joints, and the results do not support the existence of a mechanistic block to the formation of coding joints in trans. Instead, we observe that linearization of the substrate, which does not alter the cis or trans status of the recombination signals, causes a specific and dramatic reduction in coding joint formation. This unexpected result leads us to propose a "release and recapture" model for V(D)J recombination in which coding ends are frequently released from the postcleavage complex and the efficiency of coding joint formation is influenced by the efficiency with which such ends are recaptured by the complex. This implies the existence of mechanisms, operative during recombination of chromosomal substrates, that act to prevent coding end release or to facilitate coding end recapture.     

DNA cleavage activity of the V(D)J recombination protein RAG1 is autoregulated

RAG1 and RAG2 catalyze the first DNA cleavage steps in V(D)J recombination. We demonstrate that the isolated central domain of RAG1 has inherent single-stranded (ss) DNA cleavage activity, which does not require, but is enhanced by, RAG2. The central domain, therefore, contains the active-site residues necessary to perform hydrolysis of the DNA phosphodiester backbone. Furthermore, the catalytic activity of this domain on ss DNA is abolished by addition of the C-terminal domain of RAG1. The inhibitory effects of this latter domain are suppressed on substrates containing double-stranded (ds) DNA. Together, the activities of the reconstituted domains on ss versus mixed ds-ss DNA approximate the activity of intact RAG1 in the presence of RAG2. We propose how the combined actions of the RAG1 domains may function in V(D)J recombination and also in aberrant cleavage reactions that may lead to genomic instability in B and T lymphocytes.     

Characterization of excised DNA intermediates associated with V(D)J recombination at the T-cell receptor delta locus.

Lymphocyte development requires the assembly of antigen receptor genes through the specialized process of V(D)J recombination. This process is initiated by cleavage at the junction between coding segments (V, D, and J) and the recombination signal sequences that border these segments, resulting in generation of double-strand break intermediates. We have used a two-dimensional gel system to characterize broken molecules arising from V(D)J recombination at the T-cell receptor (TCR) delta locus and have identified linear species excised by Ddelta1-Ddelta2 and V-Ddelta2 rearrangement in thymus DNA. Relatively few (approximately 10) V-Ddelta2-excised linear species were detected in DNA from fetal thymocytes. The sizes of these species corresponded to the estimated distances between Ddelta2 and the V gene segments utilized by gammadelta T cells and indicated that both Ddelta2-proximal and -distal V gene segments are targeted for V-Ddelta2 rearrangement. Similar-sized species were observed in DNA from thymocytes of scid mice in which T-cell development is arrested prior to TCR expression. Since previous studies suggest that the TCR alpha/delta locus encodes more than 100 V gene segments, our results indicate that a few select V gene segments are predominantly targeted for rearrangement to Ddelta2, and this primarily accounts for the restricted Vdelta gene repertoire of gammadelta T cells.     

Unique and redundant functions of ATM and DNA-PKcs during V(D)J recombination

Lymphocyte antigen receptor genes are assembled through the process of V(D)J recombination, during which pairwise DNA cleavage of gene segments results in the formation of four DNA ends that are resolved into a coding joint and a signal joint. The joining of these DNA ends occurs in G₁-phase lymphocytes and is mediated by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. The ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), two related kinases, both function in the repair of DNA breaks generated during antigen receptor gene assembly. Although these proteins have unique functions during coding joint formation, their activities in signal joint formation, if any, have been less clear. However, two recent studies demonstrated that ATM and DNA-PKcs have overlapping activities important for signal joint formation. Here, we discuss the unique and shared activities of the ATM and DNA-PKcs kinases during V(D)J recombination, a process that is essential for lymphocyte development and the diversification of antigen receptors.Key words: ATM, V(D)J recombination, DNA-PKcs, Lymphocyte, DNA repair, RAG     

Synapsis of recombination signal sequences located in cis and DNA underwinding in V(D)J recombination

V(D)J recombination requires binding and synapsis of a complementary (12/23) pair of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, aided by a high-mobility group protein, HMG1 or HMG2. Double-strand DNA cleavage within this synaptic, or paired, complex is thought to involve DNA distortion or melting near the site of cleavage. Although V(D)J recombination normally occurs between RSSs located on the same DNA molecule (in cis), all previous studies that directly assessed RSS synapsis were performed with the two DNA substrates in trans. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a facilitated circularization assay using DNA substrates of reduced length to assess synapsis of RSSs in cis. We show that a 12/23 pair of RSSs is the preferred substrate for synapsis of cis RSSs and that the efficiency of pairing is dependent upon RAG1-RAG2 stoichiometry. Synapsis in cis occurs rapidly and is kinetically favored over synapsis of RSSs located in trans. This experimental system also allowed the generation of underwound DNA substrates containing pairs of RSSs in cis. Importantly, we found that the RAG proteins cleave such substrates substantially more efficiently than relaxed substrates and that underwinding may enhance RSS synapsis as well as RAG1/2-mediated catalysis. The energy stored in such underwound substrates may be used in the generation of DNA distortion and/or protein conformational changes needed for synapsis and cleavage. We propose that this unwinding is uniquely sensed during synapsis of an appropriate 12/23 pair of RSSs.     

A C-terminal region of RAG1 contacts the coding DNA during V(D)J recombination

The site-specific DNA rearrangement process, called V(D)J recombination, creates much of the diversity of immune receptor molecules in the adaptive immune system. Central to this reaction is the organization of the protein-DNA complex containing the proteins RAG1 and RAG2 and their DNA targets. A long-term goal is to appreciate the three-dimensional relationships between the proteins and DNA that allow the assembly of the appropriate reaction intermediates, resulting in concerted cleavage and directed rejoining of the DNA ends. Previous cross-linking approaches have mapped RAG1 contacts on the DNA. RAG1 protein contacts the DNA at the conserved heptamer and nonamer sequences as well as at the coding DNA adjacent to the heptamer. Here we subject RAG1, covalently cross-linked to DNA substrates, to partial cyanogen bromide degradation or trypsin proteolysis in order to map contacts on the protein. We find that coding-sequence contacts occur near the C terminus of RAG1, while contacts made within the recombination signal sequence occur nearer the N terminus of the core region of RAG1. A deletion protein lacking the C-terminal DNA-contacting region is still capable of making the N-terminal contacts. This suggests that the two binding interactions may exist on two separate domains of the protein. A trypsin cleavage pattern of the native protein supports this conclusion. A two-domain model for RAG1 is evaluated with respect to the larger recombination complex.     

Lymphocyte-specific compensation for XLF/cernunnos end-joining functions in V(D)J recombination

Mutations in XLF/Cernunnos (XLF) cause lymphocytopenia in humans, and various studies suggest an XLF role in classical nonhomologous end joining (C-NHEJ). We now find that XLF-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts are ionizing radiation (IR) sensitive and severely impaired for ability to support V(D)J recombination. Yet mature lymphocyte numbers in XLF-deficient mice are only modestly decreased. Moreover, XLF-deficient pro-B lines, while IR-sensitive, perform V(D)J recombination at nearly wild-type levels. Correspondingly, XLF/p53-double-deficient mice are not markedly prone to the pro-B lymphomas that occur in previously characterized C-NHEJ/p53-deficient mice; however, like other C-NHEJ/p53-deficient mice, they still develop medulloblastomas. Despite nearly normal V(D)J recombination in developing B cells, XLF-deficient mature B cells are moderately defective for immunoglobulin heavy-chain class switch recombination. Together, our results implicate XLF as a C-NHEJ factor but also indicate that developing mouse lymphocytes harbor cell-type-specific factors/pathways that compensate for the absence of XLF function during V(D)J recombination.     

Cooperative recruitment of HMGB1 during V(D)J recombination through interactions with RAG1 and DNA

During V(D)J recombination, recombination activating gene (RAG)1 and RAG2 bind and cleave recombination signal sequences (RSSs), aided by the ubiquitous DNA-binding/-bending proteins high-mobility group box protein (HMGB)1 or HMGB2. HMGB1/2 play a critical, although poorly understood, role in vitro in the assembly of functional RAG–RSS complexes, into which HMGB1/2 stably incorporate. The mechanism of HMGB1/2 recruitment is unknown, although an interaction with RAG1 has been suggested. Here, we report data demonstrating only a weak HMGB1–RAG1 interaction in the absence of DNA in several assays, including fluorescence anisotropy experiments using a novel Alexa488-labeled HMGB1 protein. Addition of DNA to RAG1 and HMGB1 in fluorescence anisotropy experiments, however, results in a substantial increase in complex formation, indicating a synergistic binding effect. Pulldown experiments confirmed these results, as HMGB1 was recruited to a RAG1–DNA complex in a RAG1 concentration-dependent manner and, interestingly, without strict RSS sequence specificity. Our finding that HMGB1 binds more tightly to a RAG1–DNA complex over RAG1 or DNA alone provides an explanation for the stable integration of this typically transient architectural protein in the V(D)J recombinase complex throughout recombination. These findings also have implications for the order of events during RAG–DNA complex assembly and for the stabilization of sequence-specific and non-specific RAG1–DNA interactions.     

The V(D)J recombination activating gene, RAG-1

The RAG-1 (recombination activating gene-1) genomic locus, which activates V(D)J recombination when introduced into NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, was isolated by serial genomic transfections of oligonucleotide-tagged DNA. A genomic walk spanning 55 kb yielded a RAG-1 genomic probe that detects a single 6.6-7.0 kb mRNA species in transfectants and pre-B and pre-T cells. RAG-1 genomic and cDNA clones were biologically active when introduced into NIH 3T3 cells. Nucleotide sequencing of human and mouse RAG-1 cDNA clones predicts 119 kd proteins of 1043 and 1040 amino acids, respectively, with 90% sequence identity. RAG-1 has been conserved between species that carry out V(D)J recombination, and its pattern of expression correlates exactly with the pattern of expression of V(D)J recombinase activity. RAG-1 may activate V(D)J recombination indirectly, or it may encode the V(D)J recombinase itself.     

Novel strand exchanges in V(D)J recombination

We describe novel products of V(D)J recombination in which signal sequences become joined to coding elements, in contrast to the standard reaction whose products are junctions of two signal sequences or two coding elements. In this variant reaction, the recombination machinery evidently recognizes signal sequences and introduces strand breaks at the normal positions, but then connects the elements in unusual combinations. The lack of fixed directionality indicates that recombination sites are not uniquely aligned when strand exchange occurs. The discovery of these variant junctions suggests a model for the evolution of the antigen receptor loci.     

Postcleavage sequence specificity in V(D)J recombination

Unintended DNA rearrangements in a differentiating lymphocyte can have severe, oncogenic consequences, but the mechanisms for avoiding pathogenic outcomes in V(D)J recombination are not well understood. The first level at which fidelity is instituted is in discrimination by the recombination proteins between authentic and inauthentic recombination signal sequences. Nevertheless, this discrimination is not absolute and cannot fully eliminate targeting errors. To learn more about the basis of specificity during V(D)J recombination, we have investigated whether it is possible for the recombination machinery to detect an inaccurately targeted sequence subsequent to cleavage. These studies indicate that even postcleavage steps in V(D)J recombination are sequence specific and that noncanonical sequences will not efficiently support the resolution of recombination intermediates in vivo. Accordingly, interventions after a mistargeting event conceivably occur at a late stage in the joining process and the likelihood may well be crucial to enforcing fidelity during antigen receptor gene rearrangement.     

V(D)J recombination and RAG-mediated transposition in yeast

Antigen receptor genes are assembled during lymphoid development by a specialized recombination reaction normally observed only in cells of the vertebrate immune system. Here, we show that expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae of murine RAG1 and RAG2, the lymphoid-specific components of the V(D)J recombinase, is sufficient to induce V(D)J cleavage and rejoining in this lower eukaryote. The RAG proteins cleave recombination substrates introduced into yeast cells, generating signal ends that can be joined to form signal joints. These signal joints are precise, as in mammalian cells, and their formation is dependent on a yeast nonhomologous end-joining protein, the XRCC4 homolog LIF1. Moreover, joining of SmaI-generated blunt ends is generally imprecise in the yeast strain used here, suggesting that the RAG proteins influence signal-end joining. Cleaved signal ends are also transposed into new sites in DNA, allowing RAG-induced transposition to be studied in vivo.     

Menage á trois: Double strand break repair,V(D)J recombination and DNA-PK

All organisms possess mechanisms to repair double strand breaks (dsbs) generated in their DNA by damaging agents. Site-specific dsbs are also introduced during V(D)J recombination. Four complementation groups of radiosensitive rodent mutants are defective in the repair of dsbs, and are unable to carry out V(D)J recombination effectively. The immune defect in Severe Combined Immunodeficient (scid) mice also results from an inability to undergo effective V(D)J recombination, and scid cell lines display a repair defect and belong to one of these complementation groups. These findings indicate a mechanistic overlap between the processes of DNA repair and V(D)J recombination. Recently, two of the genes defined by these complementation groups have been identified and shown to encode components of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). We review here the three fields which have become linked by these findings, and discuss the involvement of DNA-PK in dsb rejoining and in V(D)J recombination.