Enhanced Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation in the Abscisic Acid Low-Sensitive Mutant enhanced nitrogen fixation1 of Lotus japonicus

The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) is known to be a negative regulator of legume root nodule formation. By screening Lotus japonicus seedlings for survival on an agar medium containing 70 μm ABA, we obtained mutants that not only showed increased root nodule number but also enhanced nitrogen fixation. The mutant was designated enhanced nitrogen fixation1 (enf1) and was confirmed to be monogenic and incompletely dominant. The low sensitivity to ABA phenotype was thought to result from either a decrease in the concentration of the plant''s endogenous ABA or from a disruption in ABA signaling. We determined that the endogenous ABA concentration of enf1 was lower than that of wild-type seedlings, and furthermore, when wild-type plants were treated with abamine, a specific inhibitor of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, which results in reduced ABA content, the nitrogen fixation activity of abamine-treated plants was elevated to the same levels as enf1. We also determined that production of nitric oxide in enf1 nodules was decreased. We conclude that endogenous ABA concentration not only regulates nodulation but also nitrogen fixation activity by decreasing nitric oxide production in nodules.Many legumes establish nitrogen-fixing root nodules following reciprocal signal exchange between the plant and rhizobia (Hayashi et al., 2000; Hirsch et al., 2003). The host plant produces chemical compounds, frequently flavonoids, which induce rhizobial nod genes, whose products are involved in the synthesis and secretion of Nod factor. Perception of this chitolipooligosaccharide by the host plant results in the triggering of a signal transduction cascade that leads to root hair deformation and curling and subsequent cortical cell divisions, which establish the nodule primordium. The rhizobia enter the curled root hair cell and nodule primordial cells through an infection thread. Eventually, the rhizobia are released into nodule cells, enclosed within a membrane, and differentiate into nitrogen-fixing bacteroids that reduce atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia. In return, the host plant supplies photosynthetic products, to be used as carbon sources, to the rhizobia (Zuanazzi et al., 1998; Hayashi et al., 2000).The host plant is known to be important for regulating the number of nodules established on its roots. For example, hypernodulating mutants such as nitrate-tolerant symbiotic1 (nts1; Glycine max), hypernodulation aberrant root formation1 (har1; Lotus japonicus), super numeric nodules (sunn; Medicago truncatula), and symbiosis29 (sym29; Pisum sativum) disrupt the balance between supply and demand by developing excessive root nodules (Oka-Kira and Kawaguchi, 2006). Grafting experiments demonstrated that leaf tissue is a principal source of the systemic signals contributing to the autoregulation of nodulation (Pierce and Bauer, 1983; Kosslak and Bohlool, 1984; Krusell et al., 2002; Nishimura et al., 2002b; van Brussel et al., 2002; Searle et al., 2003; Schnabel et al., 2005). The Nts1, Har1, Sunn, and Sym29 genes encode a receptor-like kinase similar to CLAVATA1, which regulates meristem cell number and differentiation (Krusell et al., 2002; Nishimura et al., 2002a; Searle et al., 2003; Schnabel et al., 2005).Phytohormones are also known to regulate nodulation (Hirsch and Fang, 1994). For example, ethylene is a well-known negative regulator of nodulation, influencing the earliest stages from the perception of Nod factor to the growth of infection threads (Nukui et al., 2000; Oldroyd et al., 2001; Ma et al., 2003). The ethylene-insensitive mutant sickle1 (skl1) of M. truncatula has a hypernodulating phenotype (Penmetsa and Cook, 1997). Skl1 is homologous to Ethylene insensitive2 of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), which is part of the ethylene-signaling pathway (Alonso et al., 1999; Penmetsa et al., 2008). In contrast, cytokinin is a positive regulator of nodulation. The cytokinin-insensitive mutant hyperinfected1 (loss of function) of L. japonicus and the spontaneous nodule formation2 (gain of function) mutants of M. truncatula provide genetic evidence demonstrating that cytokinin plays a critical role in the activation of nodule primordia (Gonzalez-Rizzo et al., 2006; Murray et al., 2007; Tirichine et al., 2007).Abscisic acid (ABA), added at concentrations that do not affect plant growth, also negatively regulates nodulation in some legumes (Phillips, 1971; Cho and Harper, 1993; Bano et al., 2002; Bano and Harper, 2002; Suzuki et al., 2004; Nakatsukasa-Akune et al., 2005; Liang et al., 2007). Recently, M. truncatula overexpressing abscisic acid insensitive1-1, a gene that encodes a mutated protein phosphatase of the type IIC class derived from Arabidopsis and that suppresses the ABA-signaling pathway (Leung et al., 1994; Hagenbeek et al., 2000; Gampala et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2003), was shown to exhibit ABA insensitivity as well as a hypernodulating phenotype (Ding et al., 2008).In this study, we isolated a L. japonicus (Miyakojima MG20) mutant that showed an increased root nodule phenotype and proceeded to carry out its characterization. This mutant, named enhanced nitrogen fixation1 (enf1), exhibits enhanced symbiotic nitrogen fixation activity. Most legume nitrogen fixation activity mutants, such as ineffective greenish nodules1 (ign1), stationary endosymbiont nodule1, and symbiotic sulfate transporter1 (sst1), are Fix⁻ (Suganuma et al., 2003; Krusell et al., 2005; Kumagai et al., 2007).     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.     

Extracellular DNA Is Required for Root Tip Resistance to Fungal Infection

Plant defense involves a complex array of biochemical interactions, many of which occur in the extracellular environment. The apical 1- to 2-mm root tip housing apical and root cap meristems is resistant to infection by most pathogens, so growth and gravity sensing often proceed normally even when other sites on the root are invaded. The mechanism of this resistance is unknown but appears to involve a mucilaginous matrix or “slime” composed of proteins, polysaccharides, and detached living cells called “border cells.” Here, we report that extracellular DNA (exDNA) is a component of root cap slime and that exDNA degradation during inoculation by a fungal pathogen results in loss of root tip resistance to infection. Most root tips (>95%) escape infection even when immersed in inoculum from the root-rotting pathogen Nectria haematococca. By contrast, 100% of inoculated root tips treated with DNase I developed necrosis. Treatment with BAL31, an exonuclease that digests DNA more slowly than DNase I, also resulted in increased root tip infection, but the onset of infection was delayed. Control root tips or fungal spores treated with nuclease alone exhibited normal morphology and growth. Pea (Pisum sativum) root tips incubated with [³²P]dCTP during a 1-h period when no cell death occurs yielded root cap slime containing ³²P-labeled exDNA. Our results suggest that exDNA is a previously unrecognized component of plant defense, an observation that is in accordance with the recent discovery that exDNA from white blood cells plays a key role in the vertebrate immune response against microbial pathogens.Root diseases caused by soil-borne plant pathogens are a perennial source of crop loss worldwide (Bruehl, 1986; Curl and Truelove, 1986). These diseases are of increasing concern, as pesticides like methyl bromide are removed from the market due to environmental concerns (Gilreath et al., 2005). One possible alternative means of crop protection is to exploit natural mechanisms of root disease resistance (Nelson, 1990; Goswami and Punja, 2008; Shittu et al., 2009). Direct observation of root systems under diverse conditions has revealed that root tips, in general, are resistant to infection even when lesions are initiated elsewhere on the same plant root (Foster et al., 1983; Bruehl, 1986; Curl and Truelove, 1986; Smith et al., 1992; Gunawardena et al., 2005; Wen et al., 2007). This form of disease resistance is important for crop production because root growth and its directional movement in response to gravity, water, and other signals can proceed normally as long as the root tip is not invaded. The 1- to 2-mm apical region of roots houses the root meristems required for root growth and cap development, and when infection does occur, root development ceases irreversibly within a few hours even in the absence of severe necrosis (Gunawardena and Hawes, 2002). Mechanisms underlying root tip resistance to infection are unclear, but the phenomenon appears to involve root cap “slime,” a mucilaginous matrix produced by the root cap (Morré et al., 1967; Rougier et al., 1979; Foster, 1982; Chaboud, 1983; Guinel and McCully, 1986; Moody et al., 1988; Knee et al., 2001; Barlow, 2003; Iijima et al., 2008). Within the root cap slime of cereals, legumes, and most other crop species are specialized populations of living cells called root “border cells” (Supplemental Fig. S1; Hawes et al., 2000). Border cell numbers increase in response to pathogens and toxins such as aluminum, and the cell populations maintain a high rate of metabolic activity even after detachment from the root cap periphery (Brigham et al., 1995; Miyasaka and Hawes, 2000).As border cells detach from roots of cereals and legumes, a complex of more than 100 proteins, termed the root cap secretome, is synthesized and exported from living cells into the matrix ensheathing the root tip (Brigham et al., 1995). The profile of secreted proteins changes in response to challenge with soil-borne bacteria (De-la-Peña et al., 2008). In pea (Pisum sativum), root tip resistance to infection is abolished in response to proteolytic degradation of the root cap secretome (Wen et al., 2007). In addition to an array of antimicrobial enzymes and other proteins known to be components of the extracellular matrix and apoplast of higher plants, the DNA-binding protein histone H4 unexpectedly was found to be present among the secreted proteins (Wen et al., 2007). One explanation for the presence of histone is global leakage of material from disrupted nuclei in dead cells, but no cell death occurs during delivery of the secretome (Brigham et al., 1995; Wen et al., 2007). An alternative explanation for the presence of a secreted DNA-binding protein is that extracellular DNA (exDNA) also is present in root cap slime.exDNA has long been known to be a component of slimy biological matrices ranging from purulent localized human infections to bacterial capsules, biofilms, and snail exudate (Sherry and Goeller, 1950; Leuchtenberger and Schrader, 1952; Braun and Whallon, 1954; Smithies and Gibbons, 1955; Catlin, 1956; Fahy et al., 1993; Allesen-Holm et al., 2006; Spoering and Gilmore, 2006; Qin et al., 2007; Izano et al., 2008). Specialized white blood cells in humans and other species including fish recently have been shown to deploy a complex neutrophil extracellular “trap” (NET), composed of DNA and a collection of enzymes, in response to infection (Brinkmann et al., 2004; Brinkmann and Zychlinsky, 2007; Palić et al., 2007; Wartha et al., 2007; Yousefi et al., 2008). NETs appear to kill bacterial, fungal, and protozoan pathogens by localizing them within a matrix of antimicrobial peptides and proteins (Urban et al., 2006; Wartha et al., 2007; Guimaraes-Costa et al., 2009). Several extracellular peptides and proteins implicated in neutrophil function, including histone, also are present within the pea root cap secretome (Wen et al., 2007). exDNA linked with extracellular histone is a structural component of NETs, and treatment with DNase destroys NET integrity and function (Wartha et al., 2007). Moreover, human pathogens including group A Streptococcus and Streptococcus pneumoniae release extracellular DNase (Sherry and Goeller, 1950). When these activities are eliminated by mutagenesis of the encoding genes, bacteria lose their normal ability to escape the NET and multiply at the site of infection (Sumby et al., 2005; Buchanan et al., 2006). Here, we report that, in addition to histone and other secretome proteins, exDNA also is a component of root cap slime. When this exDNA is digested enzymatically, root tip resistance to infection is abolished.