LOV KELCH PROTEIN2 and ZEITLUPE repress Arabidopsis photoperiodic flowering under non-inductive conditions, dependent on FLAVIN-BINDING KELCH REPEAT F-BOX1

LOV KELCH PROTEIN2 (LKP2), ZEITLUPE (ZTL)/LOV KELCH PROTEIN1 (LKP1) and FLAVIN‐BINDING KELCH REPEAT F‐BOX1 (FKF1) constitute a family of Arabidopsis F‐box proteins that regulate the circadian clock. Over‐expression of LKP2 or ZTL causes arrhythmicity of multiple clock outputs under constant light and in constant darkness. Here, we show the significance of LKP2 and ZTL in the photoperiodic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. In plants over‐expressing LKP2, CO and FT expression was down‐regulated under long‐day conditions. LKP2 and ZTL physically interacted with FKF1, which was recruited from the nucleus into cytosolic speckles. LKP2 and ZTL inhibited the interaction of FKF1 with CYCLING DOF FACTOR 1, a ubiquitination substrate for FKF1 that is localized in the nucleus. The Kelch repeat regions of LKP2 and ZTL were sufficient for their physical interaction with FKF1 and translocation of FKF1 to the cytoplasm. Over‐expression of LKP2 Kelch repeats induced late flowering under long‐day conditions. lkp2 ztl double mutant plants flowered earlier than wild‐type plants under short‐day (non‐inductive) conditions, and both CO and FT expression levels were up‐regulated in the double mutant plants. The early flowering of lkp2 ztl was dependent on FKF1. LKP2, ZTL or both affected the accumulation of FKF1 protein during the early light period. These results indicate that an important role of LKP2 and ZTL in the photoperiodic pathway is repression of flowering under non‐inductive conditions, and this is dependent on FKF1.     

A Comparison of the Structures of the Alpha:Beta and Alpha:Gamma Dimers of Mouse Salivary Androgen-Binding Protein (ABP) and Their Differential Steroid Bindin

Mouse salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) isa family of dimeric proteins that may play a pheromonalrole in Mus musculus. The protein dimer consists of acommon alpha subunit disulfide-bonded to avariable (beta or gamma) subunit. Here wereport N-terminal sequences of the beta and gammasubunits, showing that they are very similar to eachother while being quite different from the alphasubunit.We demonstrate differential androgen binding bythe two dimers. Both bind dihydrotestosterone to aboutthe same extent but the alpha:beta dimer bindssignificantly more testosterone than the alpha:gammadimer. We discuss the possible significance ofthis diversity of androgen binding with respect to thepossibility that androgen binding is related to aputative pheromonal role for the protein.     

SQUAMOSA‐PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN 1 initiates flowering in Antirrhinum majus through the activation of meristem identity genes

The degree to which developmental genetic pathways are conserved across distantly related organisms is a major question in biology. In Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., inflorescence development is initiated in response to a combination of external and internal floral inductive signals that are perceived across the whole plant, but are integrated within the shoot apical meristem. Recently, it was demonstrated that SQUAMOSA‐PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN (SBP)‐box proteins regulate A. thaliana flowering time by mediating signals from the autonomous and photoperiod pathways, and by directly activating key genes involved in inflorescence and floral meristem identity, including FRUITFULL (FUL), APETALA1 (AP1) and LEAFY (LFY). In the distantly related core eudicot species Antirrhinum majus L., paralogous SBP‐box proteins SBP1 and SBP2 have likewise been implicated in regulating the AP1 ortholog SQUAMOSA (SQUA). To test the hypothesis that SBP‐box genes are also involved in the floral induction of A. majus, we used a reverse genetic approach to silence SBP1. SBP1‐silenced lines are late to nonflowering, and show reduced apical dominance. Furthermore, expression and sequence analyses suggest that the SBP1‐mediated transition to flowering occurs through the positive regulation of FUL/LFY homologs. Together, these data outline the utility of virus‐induced gene silencing in A. majus, and provide new insight into the conservation of flowering time genetic pathways across core eudicots.     

The DEAD-box RNA helicase DDX3 interacts with DDX5, co-localizes with it in the cytoplasm during the G2/M phase of the cycle, and affects its shuttling during mRNP export

DDX3 is involved in RNA transport, translational control, proliferation of RNA viruses, and cancer progression. From yeast two-hybrid screening using the C-terminal region of DDX3 as a bait, the DEAD-box RNA helicase DDX5 was cloned. In immunofluorescence analysis, DDX3 and DDX5 were mainly co-localized in the cytoplasm. Interestingly, cytoplasmic levels of DDX5 increased in the G(2) /M phase and consequently protein-protein interaction also increased in the cytoplasmic fraction. DDX3 was highly phosphorylated at its serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues in the steady state, but not phosphorylated at the serine residue(s) in the G(2) /M phase. DDX5 was less phosphorylated in the G(1) /S phase; however, it was highly phosphorylated at serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues in the G(2) /M phase. PP2A treatment of the cytoplasmic lysate from G(2) /M phase cells positively affected the interaction between DDX3 and DDX5, whereas, PTP1B treatment did not. In an analysis involving recombinant His-DDX3 and His-DDX5, PP2A pretreatment of His-DDX5 increased the interaction with endogenous DDX3, and vice versa. Furthermore, the results of GST pull-down experiments support the conclusion that dephosphorylation of serine and/or threonine residues in both proteins enhanced protein-protein interactions. UV cross-linking experiments showed that DDX3 and DDX5 are involved in mRNP export. Additionally, DDX3 knockdown blocked the shuttling of DDX5 to the nucleus. These data demonstrate a novel interaction between DDX3 and DDX5 through the phosphorylation of both proteins, especially in the G(2) /M phase, and suggest a novel combined mechanism of action, involving RNP remodeling and splicing, for DEAD-box RNA helicases involved in mRNP export.     

Cyclic GMP/protein kinase G type-Iα (PKG-Iα) signaling pathway promotes CREB phosphorylation and maintains higher c-IAP1, livin, survivin, and Mcl-1 expression and the inhibition of PKG-Iα kinase activity synergizes with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer cells

Previously, our laboratory showed that nitric oxide (NO)/cyclic GMP (cGMP)/protein kinase G type‐Iα (PKG‐Iα) signaling pathway plays an important role in preventing spontaneous apoptosis and promoting cell proliferation in both normal cells (bone marrow stromal cells and vascular smooth muscle cells) and certain cancer cells (ovarian cancer cells). In the present study, we investigated the novel role of the cGMP/PKG‐Iα pathway in preventing spontaneous apoptosis, promoting colony formation and regulating phosphorylation of cAMP response element binding (CREB) protein and protein expression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) and anti‐apoptotic Bcl‐2‐related proteins in NCI‐H460 and A549 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. 1H‐(1,2,4)oxadiazolo(4,3‐a)quinoxalin‐1‐one (ODQ), which blocks endogenous NO‐induced activation of cGMP/PKG‐Iα, induced apoptosis and decreased colony formation. ODQ also decreased CREB ser133 phosphorylation and protein expression of c‐IAP1, livin, and survivin. DT‐2 (inhibitor of PKG‐Iα kinase activity) increased apoptosis by twofold and decreased CREB ser133 phosphorylation and c‐IAP1, livin, and survivin expression. Gene knockdown of PKG‐Iα expression using small‐interfering RNA increased apoptosis and decreased CREB ser133 phosphorylation, and c‐IAP1, livin, survivin, and Mcl‐1 expression. Inhibition of PKG‐Iα kinase activity with DT‐2 dramatically enhanced pro‐apoptotic effects of the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin. Combined treatment of DT‐2 and cisplatin increased apoptosis compared with cisplatin or DT‐2 alone, showing a synergistic effect. The data suggest that the PKG‐Iα kinase activity is necessary for maintaining higher levels of CREB phosphorylation at ser133 and protein expression of c‐IAP1, livin, survivin, and Mcl‐1, preventing spontaneous apoptosis and promoting colony formation in NSCLC cells, which may limit the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents like cisplatin. J. Cell. Biochem. 113: 3587–3598, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The hinge region of the scaffolding protein of cell contacts, zonula occludens protein 1, regulates interacting with various signaling proteins

Zonula occludens protein 1 (ZO-1) is a ubiquitous scaffolding protein, but it is unknown why it functions in very different cellular contacts. We hypothesized that a specific segment, the unique hinge region, can be bound by very different regulatory proteins. Using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and binding assays to peptide libraries, we show, for the first time, that the hinge region directly interacts with disparate signal elements such as G-proteins alpha 12 and alpha i2, the regulator of G-protein signaling 5, multifunctional signaling protein ahnak1, and L-type Ca2+-channel beta-2-subunit. The novel binding proteins specifically bound to a coiled coil-helix predicted in the hinge region of ZO-. The interactions were modulated by phosphorylation in the hinge helix. Activation of the G-proteins influenced their association to ZO-1. In colon cells, G alpha i2 and ZO-1 were associated, as shown by coimmunoprecipitation. After cotransfection in kidney cells, G alpha i2 barely colocalized with ZO-1; the colocalization coefficient was significantly increased when epinephrine activated G-protein signaling. In conclusion, proteins with different regulatory potential adhere to and influence cellular functions of ZO-proteins, and the interactions can be modulated via its hinge region and/or the binding proteins.