The C-terminus of Raf-1 acts as a 14-3-3-dependent activation switch

The Raf-1 protein kinase is a major activator of the ERK MAPK pathway, which links signaling by a variety of cell surface receptors to the regulation of cell proliferation, survival, differentiation and migration. Signaling by Raf-1 is regulated by a complex and poorly understood interplay between phosphorylation events and protein–protein interactions. One important mode of Raf-1 regulation involves the phosphorylation-dependent binding of 14-3-3 proteins. Here, we have examined the mechanism whereby the C-terminal 14-3-3 binding site of Raf-1, S621, controls the activation of MEK-ERK signaling. We show that phosphorylation of S621 turns over rapidly and is enriched in the activated pool of endogenous Raf-1. The phosphorylation on this site can be mediated by Raf-1 itself but also by other kinase(s). Mutations that prevent the binding of 14-3-3 proteins to S621 render Raf-1 inactive by specifically disrupting its capacity to bind to ATP, and not by gross conformational alteration as indicated by intact MEK binding. Phosphorylation of S621 correlates with the inhibition of Raf-1 catalytic activity in vitro, but 14-3-3 proteins can completely reverse this inhibition. Our findings suggest that 14-3-3 proteins function as critical cofactors in Raf-1 activation, which induce and maintain the protein in a state that is competent for both ATP binding and MEK phosphorylation.     

Mitogen-activated protein kinase feedback phosphorylation regulates MEK1 complex formation and activation during cellular adhesion

Cell adhesion and spreading depend on activation of mitogen-activated kinase, which in turn is regulated both by growth factor and integrin signaling. Growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor, are capable of activating Ras and Raf, but integrin signaling is required to couple Raf to MEK and MEK to extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK). It was previously shown that Rac-p21-activated kinase (PAK) signaling regulated the physical association of MEK1 with ERK2 through phosphorylation sites in the proline-rich sequence (PRS) of MEK1. It was also shown that activation of MEK1 and ERK by integrins depends on PAK phosphorylation of S298 in the PRS. Here we report a novel MEK1-specific regulatory feedback mechanism that provides a means by which activated ERK can terminate continued PAK phosphorylation of MEK1. Activated ERK can phosphorylate T292 in the PRS, and this blocks the ability of PAK to phosphorylate S298 and of Rac-PAK signaling to enhance MEK1-ERK complex formation. Preventing ERK feedback phosphorylation on T292 during cellular adhesion prolonged phosphorylation of S298 by PAK and phosphorylation of S218 and S222, the MEK1 activating sites. We propose that activation of ERK during adhesion creates a feedback system in which ERK phosphorylates MEK1 on T292, and this in turn blocks additional S298 phosphorylation in response to integrin signaling.     

MEK1/2 dual-specificity protein kinases: structure and regulation

MEK1 and MEK2 are related protein kinases that participate in the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signal transduction cascade. This cascade participates in the regulation of a large variety of processes including apoptosis, cell cycle progression, cell migration, differentiation, metabolism, and proliferation. Moreover, oncogenic mutations in RAS or B-RAF are responsible for a large proportion of human cancers. MEK1 is activated by phosphorylation of S218 and S222 in its activation segment as catalyzed by RAF kinases in an intricate process that involves a KSR scaffold. Besides functioning as a scaffold, the kinase activity of KSR is also required for MEK activation. MEK1 regulation is unusual in that S212 phosphorylation in its activation segment is inhibitory. Moreover, active ERK catalyzes a feedback inhibitory phosphorylation of MEK1 T292 that serves to downregulate the pathway.     

Regulation of epidermal growth factor-induced connexin 43 gap junction communication by big mitogen-activated protein kinase1/ERK5 but not ERK1/2 kinase activation

The gap junction protein, Cx43, plays a pivotal role in coupling cells electrically and metabolically, and the putative phosphorylation sites that modulate its function are reflected as changes in gap junction communication. Growth factor stimulation has been correlated with a decrease in gap junction communication and a parallel activation of ERK1/2; the inhibition of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced Cx43 gap junction uncoupling was observed by using the MEK1/2 inhibitor, PD98059. Because 1) BMK1/ERK5, another MAPK family member also activated by growth factors, possesses a phosphorylation motif similar to ERK1/2, and 2) it has been reported that PD98059 can inhibit not only MEK1/2-ERK1/2 but also MEK5-BMK1 activation, we investigated whether BMK1 can regulate EGF-induced Cx43 gap junction uncoupling and phosphorylation, comparing this to the role of ERK1/2 on Cx43 function and phosphorylation induced by EGF. Selective activation or inactivation of ERK1/2 by using a constitutively active form or a dominant negative form of MEK1 did not regulate Cx43 gap junction coupling. In contrast, we found that BMK1, selectively activated by constitutively active MEK5alpha, induced gap junction uncoupling, and the inhibition of BMK1 activation by transfection of dominant negative BMK1 prevented EGF-induced gap junction uncoupling. Activated BMK1 selectively phosphorylates Cx43 on Ser-255 in vitro and in vivo, but not on S279/S282, which are reported as the consensus phosphorylation sites for MAPK. Furthermore, by co-immunoprecipitation, we found that BMK1 directly associates with Cx43 in vivo. These data indicate that BMK1 is more important than ERK1/2 in EGF-mediated Cx43 gap junction uncoupling by association and Cx43 Ser- 255 phosphorylation.     

Molecular regulation of NADPH oxidase 5 via the MAPK pathway

The mechanisms controlling the activity of NADPH oxidase 5 (Nox5) are unique in that they are independent of the protein: protein interactions that coordinate the activation of other Nox isoforms. Instead, the primary driving force for Nox5 activity is calcium. However, in a previous study we reported that the protein kinase C (PKC)-agonist PMA could induce a sustained activation of Nox5 that was independent of calcium changes. This apparent calcium-independent activation was found to be mediated by the PKC-dependent phosphorylation of specific serine and threonine residues on Nox5 which increased the calcium sensitivity of the enzyme and enabled activation at resting levels of calcium. However, the specific kinase(s) mediating the phosphorylation and activation of Nox5 are not known. As PKC can activate the MEK/ERK1/2 signaling pathway, we hypothesized that Nox5 is activated by the coordinated phosphorylation of both MAPK and PKC pathways. The inhibition of MEK1 using PD-98059 and U-0126 significantly reduced the phosphorylation and activity of Nox5 in response to PMA but not to the calcium-mobilizing stimulus ionomycin. Dominant negative MEK1 and knockdown of endogenous MEK1/2 using a specific small interfering RNA also inhibited Nox5 activity in response to PMA. The mutation of S498 to a nonphosphorylatable residue and to a lesser degree T494 blocked the ability of ERK to stimulate Nox5 activity. However, a constitutively active form of MEK1 failed to increase Nox5 activity in the absence of PMA stimulation. These results suggest that the MEK/ERK1/2 pathway is necessary but not sufficient to regulate the PMA-dependent activation of Nox5.     

Negative regulation of MAPKK by phosphorylation of a conserved serine residue equivalent to Ser212 of MEK1

The MAPKKs MEK1 and MEK2 are activated by phosphorylation, but little is known about how these enzymes are inactivated. Here, we show that MEK1 is phosphorylated in vivo at Ser(212), a residue conserved among all MAPKK family members. Mutation of Ser(212) to alanine enhanced the basal activity of MEK1, whereas the phosphomimetic aspartate mutation completely suppressed the activation of both wild-type MEK1 and the constitutively activated MEK1(S218D/S222D) mutant. Phosphorylation of Ser(212) did not interfere with activating phosphorylation of MEK1 at Ser(218)/Ser(222) or with binding to ERK2 substrate. Importantly, mimicking phosphorylation of the equivalent Ser(212) residue of the yeast MAPKKs Pbs2p and Ste7p similarly abrogated their biological function. Our findings suggest that Ser(212) phosphorylation represents an evolutionarily conserved mechanism involved in the negative regulation of MAPKKs.     

MEK/ERK-dependent uPAR expression is required for motility via phosphorylation of P70S6K in human hepatocarcinoma cells

Motility and invasiveness events require specific intracellular signaling cascade activations. In cancer liver cells, one of these mechanisms could involve the MAPK MEK/ERK cascade activation which has been shown over expressed and activated in hepatocellular carcinoma. To study whether the MEK/ERK cascade is involved in the motility of HCC, we examined the effect of MEK inhibitor and ERK2 silencing using monolayer wound-healing assays and fluoroblock invasion systems. Evidence was provided that the MAPK cascade is a key transduction pathway which controls HCC cells motility and invasiveness. We could disconnect proliferation to motility using mitomycin C and we established that RNAi-mediated inhibition of ERK2 led to strongly reduced cell motility. To improve our understanding, we analysed the regulation and the role of urokinase receptor (uPAR) in this process. We provided evidence that uPAR was under a MEK/ERK dependent mechanism and blocking uPAR activity using specific antagonist or inhibiting its expression by RNA interference which resulted in complete inhibition of motility. Moreover, we found in MAPK inhibited cultures and in uPAR silencing cells that p70S6K phosphorylation on residue Thr-389 was significantly reduced, whereas Ser-421/Thr-424 phosphorylation did not change. We highlighted that the FRAP/mTOR pathway did not affect motility and Thr-389 phosphorylation. Furthermore, we demonstrated that p70S6K inhibition by RNA interference completely inhibited hepatocarcinoma cell motility. Therefore, targeting uPAR and/or MEK/ERK/S6K by RNA interference could be a major therapeutic strategy for the future treatment of invasive hepatocarcinoma cells.     

Peroxynitrite activates mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) via a MEK-independent pathway: a role for protein kinase C.

In this study we show that phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2; also known as p44/42MAPK) following peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)) exposure occurs via a MAPK kinase (MEK)-independent but PKC-dependent pathway in rat-1 fibroblasts. ONOO(-)-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was not blocked by MEK inhibitors PD98059 and U0126. Furthermore, no increase in MEK phosphorylation was detected upon ONOO(-) treatment. Staurosporine was used to investigate whether protein kinase C (PKC) is involved. This was confirmed by down-regulation of PKC by phorbol-12,13-dibutyrate, which resulted in significant reduction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation by ONOO(-), implying that activation of ERK by ONOO(-) depends on activation of PKC. Indeed, PKCalpha and epsilon were activated upon ONOO(-) exposure. When cells were treated with ONOO(-) in a calcium-free buffer, no activation of PKCalpha was detected. Concomitantly, a reduction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed suggesting that calcium was required for translocation of PKCalpha and ERK phosphorylation by ONOO(-). Indeed, ONOO(-) exposure resulted in increased cytosolic calcium, which depended on the presence of extracellular calcium. Finally, data using G?6976, an inhibitor of calcium-dependent PKC activation, implied that ONOO(-)-mediated ERK1/2 phosphorylation depends on activation of a calcium-dependent PKC.     

Cross-talk between the ERK and p70 S6 kinase (S6K) signaling pathways. MEK-dependent activation of S6K2 in cardiomyocytes.

The alpha(1)-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine (PE) and insulin each stimulate protein synthesis in cardiomyocytes. Activation of protein synthesis by PE is involved in the development of cardiac hypertrophy. One component involved here is p70 S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), which lies downstream of mammalian target of rapamycin, whose regulation is thought to involve phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and protein kinase B (PKB). S6K2 is a recently identified homolog of S6K1 whose regulation is poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that in adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, PE and insulin each activate S6K2, activation being 3.5- and 5-fold above basal, respectively. Rapamycin completely blocked S6K2 activation by either PE or insulin. Three different inhibitors of MEK1/2 abolished PE-induced activation of S6K2 whereas expression of constitutively active MEK1 activated S6K2, without affecting the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and JNK pathways, indicating that MEK/ERK signaling plays a key role in regulation of S6K2 by PE. PE did not activate PKB, and expression of dominant negative PKB failed to block activation of S6K2 by PE, indicating PE-induced S6K2 activation is independent of PKB. However, this PKB mutant did partially block S6K2 activation by insulin, indicating PKB is required here. Another hypertrophic agent, endothelin 1, also activated S6K2 in a MEK-dependent manner. Our findings provide strong evidence for novel signaling connections between MEK/ERK and S6K2.     

Interactions of opioid and chemokine receptors: oligomerization of mu,kappa, and delta with CCR5 on immune cells

In this study, we examined the signaling pathways for extracellular signal-related protein kinase (ERK) activation by three structurally different peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonists. In murine C2C12 myoblasts, treatment with 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)), ciglitazone, and GW1929 leads to ERK1/2 phosphorylation in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Consistent with ERK phosphorylation, mitogen activated protein/ERK kinase (MEK) phosphorylation as well as Raf-1 kinase activity are also accordingly stimulated, while the constitutive Ser259 phosphorylation of Raf-1 is decreased. The ERK phosphorylation induced by PPARgamma agonists is not blocked by the PKC inhibitors GF109203X and Ro31-8220, the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin, the Ras inhibitor FPTI, the negative mutant of Ras, or the PPARgamma antagonist bisphenol A diglycidil ether. Expression of PPARgamma2 without DNA binding domain or with a nonphosphorylatable mutant (S112A) fails to change ERK phosphorylation by 15d-PGJ(2). On the contrary, the ERK phosphorylation by PPARgamma agonists is inhibited by the MEK inhibitor PD98059, GSH, and permeable SOD mimetic MnTBAP. Chemiluminescence study reveals that these three PPARgamma agonists are able to induce superoxide anion production, with an efficacy similar to their action on ERK phosphorylation. Consistent with this notion, we also show that superoxide anion donor 2,3-dimethoxy-1,4-naphoquinone elicits ERK phosphorylation. In this study, we for the first time demonstrate a novel mechanism, independent of Ras activation but initiated by superoxide anion production, for PPARgamma agonists to trigger the Raf-MEK-ERK1/2 signaling pathway.     

Tumor cells with KRAS or BRAF mutations or ERK5/MAPK7 amplification are not addicted to ERK5 activity for cell proliferation

ERK5, encoded by MAPK7, has been proposed to play a role in cell proliferation, thus attracting interest as a cancer therapeutic target. While oncogenic RAS or BRAF cause sustained activation of the MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway, ERK5 is directly activated by MEK5. It has been proposed that RAS and RAF proteins can also promote ERK5 activation. Here we investigated the interplay between RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK and ERK5 signaling and studied the role of ERK5 in tumor cell proliferation in 2 disease-relevant cell models. We demonstrate that although an inducible form of CRAF (CRAF:ER*) can activate ERK5 in fibroblasts, the response is delayed and reflects feed-forward signaling. Additionally, oncogenic KRAS and BRAF do not activate ERK5 in epithelial cells. Although KRAS and BRAF do not couple directly to MEK5-ERK5, ERK5 signaling might still be permissive for proliferation. However, neither the selective MEK5 inhibitor BIX02189 or ERK5 siRNA inhibited proliferation of colorectal cancer cells harbouring KRAS^G12C/G13D or BRAF^V600E. Furthermore, there was no additive or synergistic effect observed when BIX02189 was combined with the MEK1/2 inhibitor Selumetinib (AZD6244), suggesting that ERK5 was neither required for proliferation nor a driver of innate resistance to MEK1/2 inhibitors. Finally, even cancer cells with MAPK7 amplification were resistant to BIX02189 and ERK5 siRNA, showing that ERK5 amplification does not confer addiction to ERK5 for cell proliferation. Thus ERK5 signaling is unlikely to play a role in tumor cell proliferation downstream of KRAS or BRAF or in tumor cells with ERK5 amplification. These results have important implications for the role of ERK5 as an anti-cancer drug target.     

A MEK-independent role for CRAF in mitosis and tumor progression

RAF kinases regulate cell proliferation and survival and can be dysregulated in tumors. The role of RAF in cell proliferation has been linked to its ability to activate mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK) and mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (ERK). Here we identify a MEK-independent role for RAF in tumor growth. Specifically, in mitotic cells, CRAF becomes phosphorylated on Ser338 and localizes to the mitotic spindle of proliferating tumor cells in vitro as well as in murine tumor models and in biopsies from individuals with cancer. Treatment of tumors with allosteric inhibitors, but not ATP-competitive RAF inhibitors, prevents CRAF phosphorylation on Ser338 and localization to the mitotic spindle and causes cell-cycle arrest at prometaphase. Furthermore, we identify phospho-Ser338 CRAF as a potential biomarker for tumor progression and a surrogate marker for allosteric RAF blockade. Mechanistically, CRAF, but not BRAF, associates with Aurora kinase A (Aurora-A) and Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) at the centrosomes and spindle poles during G2/M. Indeed, allosteric or genetic inhibition of phospho-Ser338 CRAF impairs Plk1 activation and accumulation at the kinetochores, causing prometaphase arrest, whereas a phospho-mimetic Ser338D CRAF mutant potentiates Plk1 activation, mitosis and tumor progression in mice. These findings show a previously undefined role for RAF in tumor progression beyond the RAF-MEK-ERK paradigm, opening new avenues for targeting RAF in cancer.     

Reconstitution of the Raf-1-MEK-ERK signal transduction pathway in vitro.

Raf-1 is a serine/threonine kinase which is essential in cell growth and differentiation. Tyrosine kinase oncogenes and receptors and p21ras can activate Raf-1, and recent studies have suggested that Raf-1 functions upstream of MEK (MAP/ERK kinase), which phosphorylates and activates ERK. To determine whether or not Raf-1 directly activates MEK, we developed an in vitro assay with purified recombinant proteins. Epitope-tagged versions of Raf-1 and MEK and kinase-inactive mutants of each protein were expressed in Sf9 cells, and ERK1 was purified as a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein from bacteria. Raf-1 purified from Sf9 cells which had been coinfected with v-src or v-ras was able to phosphorylate kinase-active and kinase-inactive MEK. A kinase-inactive version of Raf-1 purified from cells that had been coinfected with v-src or v-ras was not able to phosphorylate MEK. Raf-1 phosphorylation of MEK activated it, as judged by its ability to stimulate the phosphorylation of myelin basic protein by glutathione S-transferase-ERK1. We conclude that MEK is a direct substrate of Raf-1 and that the activation of MEK by Raf-1 is due to phosphorylation by Raf-1, which is sufficient for MEK activation. We also tested the ability of protein kinase C to activate Raf-1 and found that, although protein kinase C phosphorylation of Raf-1 was able to stimulate its autokinase activity, it did not stimulate its ability to phosphorylate MEK.     

Integrin-mediated adhesion regulates ERK nuclear translocation and phosphorylation of Elk-1

Integrin-mediated adhesion to the extracellular matrix permits efficient growth factor-mediated activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs). Points of regulation have been localized to the level of receptor phosphorylation or to activation of the downstream components, Raf and MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase). However, it is also well established that ERK translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus is required for G1 phase cell cycle progression. Here we show that phosphorylation of the nuclear ERK substrate, Elk-1 at serine 383, is anchorage dependent in response to growth factor treatment of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. Furthermore, when we activated ERK in nonadherent cells by expression of active components of the ERK cascade, subsequent phosphorylation of Elk-1 at serine 383 and Elk-1-mediated transactivation were still impaired compared with adherent cells. Elk-1 phosphorylation was dependent on an intact actin cytoskeleton, as discerned by treatment with cytochalasin D (CCD). Finally, expression of active MEK failed to predominantly localize ERK to the nucleus in suspended cells or adherent cells treated with CCD. These data show that integrin-mediated organization of the actin cytoskeleton regulates localization of activated ERK, and in turn the ability of ERK to efficiently phosphorylate nuclear substrates.     

Alternative ERK5 regulation by phosphorylation during the cell cycle

ERK5 is a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family that, after stimulation, is activated selectively by dual phosphorylation in the TEY motif by MAPK kinase 5 (MEK5). ERK5 plays an important role in regulating cell proliferation, survival, differentiation and stress response. Moreover, it is involved in G2/M progression and timely mitotic entry. ERK5 is phosphorylated during mitosis, but the molecular mechanism by which it is regulated during this phase is still unclear. Here we show that although ERK5 is phosphorylated in mitosis, this does not occur on the activation motif (TEY), but at its C-terminal half. We have identified five sites of ERK5 phosphorylation in mitosis, two of them unknown. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ERK5 phosphorylation in mitosis is not MEK5-dependent, but rather, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-dependent. Using a mutagenesis approach, we analysed the importance of the phosphorylated residues in ERK5 function; our evidence show that phosphorylation in mitosis of the residues identified inhibits ERK5 activity and regulates ERK5 shuttling from cytoplasm to the nucleus. These results reveal a previously unreported form of ERK5 regulation by phosphorylation and establish a link between CDK and ERK5 pathways during mitosis, which could be crucial for the correct progression of the cell cycle.     

Ligand-mediated dephosphorylation signaling for MAP kinase

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), also known as classical mitogen-activated protein kinase, plays critical roles in cell regulation. ERK is activated through phosphorylation by a cascade of protein kinases including MEK. Various ligands activate the MEK/ERK pathway through receptor-dependent cell signaling. In cultured cells, many ligands such as growth factors, hormones, cytokines and vasoactive peptides elicit transient activation of MEK/ERK, often peaking at ~10 min after the cell treatment. Here, we describe a novel biological event, in which ligand-mediated cell signaling results in the dephosphorylation of MEK/ERK. Neuromedin N and neurotensin, peptides derived from the same precursor polypeptide, elicit cell signaling through the neurotensin receptors. In cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs), but not in human pulmonary artery endothelial cells (PAECs), we found that both neuromedin N and neurotensin promoted the dephosphorylation of ERK and MEK. Human PASMCs were found to express neurotensin receptor (NTR)-1, −2 and −3, while human PAECs only express NTR3. Neuromedin N-mediated dephosphorylation was suppressed by small chemical inhibitors of protein phosphatase 1/2A and peptidyl-prolyl isomerase. Transmission electron microscopy showed the formation of endocytic vesicles in response to neuromedin N treatment, and dephosphorylation did not occur when sorting nexin 9, a critical regulator of the endocytic vesicle formation, was knocked down. We conclude that neuromedin N and neurotensin elicit a unique dephosphorylation signaling in the MEK/ERK pathway that is regulated by endocytosis. Considering the pathophysiological importance of the MEK/ERK pathway, this discovery of the dephosphorylation mechanism should advance the field of cell signaling.     

Platelet ERK2 activation by thrombin is dependent on calcium and conventional protein kinases C but not Raf-1 or B-Raf

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation pathways have been well characterized in a number of cell types but very few data are available for platelets. The thrombin-induced signaling pathway leading to ERK2 activation in platelets is largely uncharacterized. In this study, we investigated the kinases involved in thrombin-induced ERK2 activation in conditions of maximal ERK2 activation. We found that thrombin-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase (MEK)1/2 activation was necessary for ERK2 phosphorylation. We obtained strong evidence that conventional protein kinase Cs (PKCs) and calcium are involved in thrombin-induced ERK2 activation. First, ERK2 and MEK1/2 phosphorylation was totally inhibited by low concentrations (1 microM) of RO318425, a specific inhibitor of conventional PKCs. Second, Ca(2+), from either intracellular pools or the extracellular medium, was necessary for ERK2 activation and conventional PKC activation, excluding the involvement of a new class of calcium-insensitive PKCs. Third, LY294002 and wortmannin had no significant effect on ERK2 activation, even at concentrations that inhibit phosphatidylinositol (PI)3-kinase (5 microM to 25 microM and 50 nM, respectively). This suggests that PI3-kinase was not necessary for ERK2 activation and therefore, that PI3-kinase-dependent atypical PKCs were not involved. Surprisingly, in contrast to proliferative cells, we found that the serine/threonine kinases Raf-1 and B-Raf were not an intermediate kinase between conventional PKCs and MEK1/2. After immunoprecipitation of Raf-1 and B-Raf, the basal glutathione S-transferase-MEK1 phosphorylation observed in resting platelets was not upregulated by thrombin and was still observed in the absence of anti-Raf-1 or anti-B-Raf antibodies. In these conditions, the in vitro cascade kinase assay did not detect any MEK activity. Thus in platelets, thrombin-induced ERK2 activation is activated by conventional PKCs independently of Raf-1 and B-Raf activation.     

Characterization of Regulatory Events Associated with Membrane Targeting of p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase 1

RSK is a serine/threonine kinase containing two distinct catalytic domains. Found at the terminus of the Ras/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase cascade, mitogen-stimulated ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) activity requires multiple inputs. These inputs include phosphorylation of the C-terminal kinase domain activation loop by ERK1/2 and phosphorylation of the N-terminal kinase domain activation loop by phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1). Previous work has shown that upon mitogen stimulation, RSK accumulates in the nucleus. Here we show that prior to nuclear translocation, epidermal growth factor-stimulated RSK1 transiently associates with the plasma membrane. Myristylation of wild-type RSK1 results in an activated enzyme in the absence of added growth factors. When RSK is truncated at the C terminus, the characterized ERK docking is removed and RSK phosphotransferase activity is completely abolished. When myristylated, however, this myristylated C-terminal truncated form (myrCTT) is activated at a level equivalent to myristylated wild-type (myrWT) RSK. Both myrWT RSK and myrCTT RSK can signal to the RSK substrate c-Fos in the absence of mitogen activation. Unlike myrWT RSK, myrCTT RSK is not further activated by serum. Only the myristylated RSK proteins are basally phosphorylated on avian RSK1 serine 381, a site critical for RSK activity. The myristylated and unmyristylated RSK constructs interact with PDK1 upon mitogen stimulation, and this interaction is insensitive to the MEK inhibitor UO126. Because a kinase-inactive CTT RSK can be constitutively activated by targeting to the membrane, we propose that ERK may have a dual role in early RSK activation events: preliminary phosphorylation of RSK and escorting RSK to a membrane-associated complex, where additional MEK/ERK-independent activating inputs are encountered.