Sn-S and Ru-Ru bonds cleavage reactions between [Ph3SnS(CH2)3SSnPh3] and Ru3(CO)12: X-ray crystal structures of [Ph3SnS(CH2)3SSnPh3] and trans-[Ru(CO)4(SnPh3)2]

The organotin complex [Ph₃SnS(CH₂)₃SSnPh₃] (1) was synthesized by PdCl₂ catalyzed reaction between Ph₃SnCl and disodium-1,3-propanedithiolate which in turn was prepared from 1,2-propanedithiol and sodium in refluxing THF. Reaction of 1 with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in refluxing THF affords the mononuclear complex trans-[Ru(CO)₄(SnPh₃)₂] (2) and the dinuclear complex [Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-κ²-SCH₂CH₂CH₂S)] (3) in 20 and 11% yields, respectively, formed by cleavage of Sn-S bond of the ligand and Ru-Ru bonds of the cluster. Treatment of pymSSnPPh₃ (pymS = pyrimidine-2-thiolate) with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ at 55-60 °C also gives 2 in 38% yield. Both 1 and 2 have been characterized by a combination of spectroscopic data and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.     

New ruthenium complexes from Ru3(CO)12 and 6-Alkyl- or 6-Phenyl-2-hydroxypyridines

Trirutheniumdodecacarbonyl (Ru₃(CO)₁₂) reacts with 2-hydroxy-6-methylpyridine and with 2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline in toluene to form centrosymmetric tetranuclear complexes of the type [Ru(η², μ-L)(CO)₂(μ₃-L)Ru(CO)₂]₂, where L is the respective (N,O)-pyridonate ligand (2 and 3). The structures of these complexes, which are almost insoluble in all common solvents, could be determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ with 2-hydroxy-4,6-diphenylpyridine in methanol includes ortho-metallation at the phenyl ring, furnishing the dinuclear complex [Ru(κ²N,C-L)(CO)₂(μ-OCH₃)₂Ru(CO)₂ (κ²N,C-L)] (4), where L = (2-(6-hydroxy-4-phenylpyridin-2-yl)phenyl), according to an X-ray crystal structure determination.     

Synthesis, structure and reactivity of complexes containing [M(S2)2] fragments (M=Ru, Os; (S2)=1,2-benzenedithiolate (2−))

Subsequent addition of 1,2-benzenedithiol (S₂-H₂) and nBuLi to a solution of [Ru(NO)Cl₃ · xMeOH] in THF afforded exclusively the monomeric species NBu₄[Ru^II(NO)(S₂)₂] (1). Formation of dimeric (NBu₄)₂[Ru^II(NO)(S₂)₂]₂ (2) has been confirmed when the deprotonated ligand S₂-Li₂ was added to [Ru(NO)Cl₃ · xMeOH] and allowed to stir for 30 h. The monomer 1 undergoes aerial oxidation to give (NBu₄)₂[Ru^IV(S₂)₃] (3). The reaction between RuCl₃ · xH₂O and S₂-H₂ in the presence of NaOMe, afforded the dinulear Ru^III species (NMe₄)₂[Ru^III(S₂)₂]₂ (4). A modified method for the preparation of 1 is being employed to synthesize the osmium analogue NBu₄[Os(NO)(S₂)₂] (5) effectively. The solid state structures of 1, 2 and 3 were determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis. A comparison of relevant bond distance data suggests that 1,2-benzenedithiolate acts as an “innocent” ligand.     

Substitution reactions of tetrahydrofuran in [Cr(thf)3Cl3] with mono and bidentate N-donor ligands: X-ray crystal structures of [Cr(bipy)(OH2)Cl3] and [HpyNH2][Cr(bipy)Cl4]

Substitution of thf ligands in [Cr(thf)₃Cl₃] and [Cr(thf)₂(OH₂)Cl₃] was investigated. 2,2′-Bipyridine (bipy) was reacted with [Cr(thf)₃Cl₃] to form [Cr(bipy)(thf)Cl₃] (1), which was subsequently reacted with water to give [Cr(bipy)(OH₂)Cl₃] (2). Reaction of 1 with acetonitrile (CH₃CN), pyridine (py) and pyridine derivatives to form [Cr(bipy)(L)Cl₃] (L = CH₃CN 3, py 4 and 4-pyR with R = NH₂5, Bu^t6 and Ph 7). In addition, the substitution of bipy in [Cr(thf)₃Cl₃] was followed by ¹H NMR spectroscopy at room temperature, which showed completion of the reaction in ca. 100 min. Complex 2 was characterised by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The theoretical powder diffraction pattern of 2 was compared to the experimentally obtained powder X-ray diffraction pattern, and shows excellent agreement. The dimer [Cr₂(bipy)₂Cl₄(μ-Cl)₂] was cleaved asymmetrically to give the anionic complex [Cr(bipy)Cl₄]⁻ (8) and [Cr(bipy)₂Cl₂]⁺ (9). Complexes 8 and 9 were characterised by single crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Formation and structural chemistry of the unusual cyanide-bridged dinuclear species [Ru2(NN)2(CN)7] (NN = 2,2′-bipyridine or 1,10-phenanthroline)

Crystallisation of simple cyanoruthenate complex anions [Ru(NN)(CN)₄]²⁻ (NN = 2,2′-bipyridine or 1,10-phenanthroline) in the presence of Lewis-acidic cations such as Ln(III) or guanidinium cations results, in addition to the expected [Ru(NN)(CN)₄]²⁻ salts, in the formation of small amounts of salts of the dinuclear species [Ru₂(NN)₂(CN)₇]³⁻. These cyanide-bridged anions have arisen from the combination of two monomer units [Ru(NN)(CN)₄]²⁻ following the loss of one cyanide, presumably as HCN. The crystal structures of [Nd(H₂O)_5.5][Ru₂(bipy)₂(CN)₇] · 11H₂O and [Pr(H₂O)₆][Ru₂(phen)₂(CN)₇] · 9H₂O show that the cyanoruthenate anions form Ru-CN-Ln bridges to the Ln(III) cations, resulting in infinite coordination polymers consisting of fused Ru₂Ln₂(μ-CN)₄ squares and Ru₄Ln₂(μ-CN)₆ hexagons, which alternate to form a one-dimensional chain. In [CH₆N₃]₃[Ru₂(bipy)₂(CN)₇] · 2H₂O in contrast the discrete complex anions are involved in an extensive network of hydrogen-bonding involving terminal cyanide ligands, water molecules, and guanidinium cations. In the [Ru₂(NN)₂(CN)₇]³⁻ anions themselves the two NN ligands are approximately eclipsed, lying on the same side of the central Ru-CN-Ru axis, such that their peripheries are in close contact. Consequently, when NN = 4,4′-^tBu₂-2,2′-bipyridine the steric bulk of the t-butyl groups prevents the formation of the dinuclear anions, and the only product is the simple salt of the monomer, [CH₆N₃]₂[Ru(^tBu₂bipy)(CN)₄] · 2H₂O. We demonstrated by electrospray mass spectrometry that the dinuclear by-product [Ru₂(phen)₂(CN)₇]³⁻ could be formed in significant amounts during the synthesis of monomeric [Ru(phen)(CN)₄]²⁻ if the reaction time was too long or the medium too acidic. In the solid state the luminescence properties of [Ru₂(bipy)₂(CN)₇]³⁻ (as its guanidinium salt) are comparable to those of monomeric [Ru(bipy)(CN)₄]²⁻, with a ³MLCT emission at 581 nm.     

A new series of iodocarbonyl ruthenium (II) complexes with unsymmetrical phosphine-phosphine sulfide ligands of the type Ph2P(CH2)nP(S)Ph2, n = 1-4: Isolation and structural investigation

Hexa-coordinated chelate complex cis-[Ru(CO)₂I₂(P∩S)] (1a) {P∩S = η²-(P,S)-coordinated} and penta-coordinated non-chelate complexes cis-[Ru(CO)₂I₂(P∼S)] (1b-d) {P∼S = η¹-(P)-coordinated} are produced by the reaction of polymeric [Ru(CO)₂I₂]_n with equimolar quantity of the ligands Ph₂P(CH₂)_nP(S)Ph₂ {n = 1(a), 2(b), 3(c), 4(d)} in dichloromethane at room temperature. The bidentate nature of the ligand a in the complex 1a leads to the formation of five-membered chelate ring which confers extra stability to the complex. On the other hand, 1:2 (Ru:L) molar ratio reaction affords the hexa-coordinated non-chelate complexes cis,cis,trans-[Ru(CO)₂I₂(P∼S)₂] (2a-d) irrespective of the ligands. All the complexes show two equally intense terminal ν(CO) bands in the range 2028-2103 cm⁻¹. The ν(PS) band of complex 1a occurs 23 cm⁻¹ lower region compared to the corresponding free ligand suggesting chelation via metal-sulfur bond formation. X-ray crystallography reveals that the Ru(II) atom occupies the center of a slightly distorted octahedral geometry. The complexes have also been characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy.     

Bis(acetylacetonato)ruthenium(II) complexes containing bulky tertiary phosphines. Formation and redox behaviour of Ru(acac)2 (PR3) (R = Pr, Cy) complexes with ethene, carbon monoxide, and bridging dinitrogen

Reaction of cis-[Ru(acac)₂(η²-C₈H₁₄)₂] (1) (acac = acetylacetonato) with two equivalents of PⁱPr₃ in THF at −25 °C gives trans-[Ru(acac)₂(PⁱPr₃)₂], trans-3, which rapidly isomerizes to cis-3 at room temperature. The poorly soluble complex [Ru(acac)₂(PCy₃)₂] (4), which is isolated similarly from cis-[Ru(acac)₂(η²-C₂H₄)₂] (2) and PCy₃, appears to exist in the cis-configuration in solution according to NMR data, although an X-ray diffraction study of a single crystal shows the presence of trans-4. In benzene or toluene 2 reacts with PⁱPr₃ or PCy₃ to give exclusively cis-[Ru(acac)₂(η²-C₂H₄)(L)] [L = PⁱPr₃ (5), PCy₃ (6)], whereas in THF species believed to be either square pyramidal [Ru(acac)₂L], with apical L, or the corresponding THF adducts, can be detected by ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. Complexes 3-6 react with CO (1 bar) giving trans-[Ru(acac)₂(CO)(L)] [L = PⁱPr₃ (trans-8), PCy₃ (trans-9)], which are converted irreversibly into the cis-isomers in refluxing benzene. Complex 5 scavenges traces of dinitrogen from industrial grade dihydrogen giving a bridging dinitrogen complex, cis-[{Ru(acac)₂(PⁱPr₃)} ₂(μ-N₂)] (10). The structures of cis-3, trans-4, 5, 6 and 10 · C₆H₁₄ have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Complexes trans- and cis-3, 5, 6, cis-8, and trans- and cis-9 each show fully reversible one-electron oxidation by cyclic voltammetry in CH₂Cl₂ at −50 °C with E_1/2(Ru^3+/2+) values spanning −0.14 to +0.92 V (versus Ag/AgCl), whereas for the vinylidene complexes [Ru(acac)₂ (CCHR)(PⁱPr₃)] [R = SiMe₃ (11), Ph (12)] the process is irreversible at potentials of +0.75 and +0.62 V, respectively. The trend in potentials reflects the order of expected π-acceptor ability of the ligands: PⁱPr₃, PCy₃ <C ₂H₄ < CCHR < CO. The UV-Vis spectrum of the thermally unstable, electrogenerated Ru^III-ethene cation 6⁺ has been observed at −50 °C. Cyclic voltammetry of the μ-dinitrogen complex 10 shows two, fully reversible processes in CH₂Cl₂ at −50 °C at +0.30 and +0.90 V (versus Ag/AgCl) corresponding to the formation of 10⁺ (Ru^II,III) and 10²⁺ (Ru^III,III). The former, generated electrochemically at −50 °C, shows a band in the near IR at ca. 8900 cm⁻¹ (w_1/2 ca. 3700 cm⁻¹) consistent with the presence of a valence delocalized system. The comproportionation constant for the equilibrium 10 + 10²⁺ ? 2 10⁺ at 223 K is estimated as 10^13.6.     

Versatile coordination behaviour of Ph2AsCH2AsPh2 with Ru(II)

Treatment of ‘RuCl₃ · 3H₂O’ with Ph₂AsCH₂AsPh₂ (dpam) in hot EtOH gives either trans-[RuCl₂(dpam-As,As′)(dpam-As)₂] (1), or cis-[RuCl₂(dpam-As,As′)₂] (2), depending on the mole ratio. On exposure to light, solutions of 2 isomerise to trans-[RuCl₂(dpam-As,As′)₂] (3). Treatment of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with two equivalents of dpam in CH₂Cl₂ gave a mixture of two products, from which trans-[RuCl₂(PPh₃) (dpam-As,As′)(dpam-As)] (4) was isolated by recrystallisation. The crystal structures of 1-4 are reported. Complexes 1-3 in CH₂Cl₂ undergo electrochemical oxidation to Ru(III), and the Ru(III) form of 2 undergoes isomerisation on the voltammetric timescale to the Ru(III) form of 3.     

Synthesis and characterization of ruthenium(II) complexes bearing the bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine ligand

The reaction of [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂]_n with bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (bpma) in refluxing ethanol followed by anion exchange yields two products: cis,fac-[Ru(bpma)(CO)₂Cl]PF₆ (1a, 71%) and trans,fac-[Ru(bpma)(CO)₂Cl]PF₆ (1b, 29%). Reaction of 1a with AgBF₄ in acetone, followed by acetonitrile and then anion exchange gave cis,fac-[Ru(bpma)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)](PF₆)₂ (2a). In the same way, 1b afforded trans,fac-[Ru(bpma)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)](PF₆)₂ (2b). Reaction of depolymerized [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂]_n with bpma in ethanol at room temperature afforded cis,cis-[Ru(η²-bpma)(CO)₂Cl₂] (3). In refluxing ethanol, 3 was converted to cis,fac-[Ru(bpma)(CO)₂Cl]Cl (1a-Cl). Heating 3 in chlorobenzene afforded 1b-Cl, exclusively; heating 3 in ethylene glycol gave mainly 1a-Cl. Heating 1a-Cl in ethanol resulted in no isomerization, but heating in chlorobenzene gave a mixture of 3 and 1b-Cl. Anion exchange for PF₆ with 1a-Cl and 1b-Cl afforded 1a and 1b, respectively, whereas anion exchange for BPh₄ afforded 1a-BPh₄. Compounds 1a, 1b, 2a and 3 have been structurally characterized.     

Reduction of diruthenium(II,III) carboxylate compounds with hydroquinone: a facile preparation of diruthenium(II) complexes

The synthesis of the diruthenium(II) compounds [Ru₂(μ-O₂CR)₄(MeOH)₂] [R = Me (1), Ph (2), CMePh₂ (3) C₆H₄-p-OMe (4), C₆H₄-p-CMe₃ (5)] by reaction of with hydroquinone, under a nitrogen atmosphere, in the presence of a base is described. This reaction constitutes an easy via to the preparation of diruthenium(II) compounds. The structure of the complexes [Ru₂(μ-O₂CMe)₄(MeOH)₂] (1) and [Ru₂(μ-O₂CPh)₄(thf)₂] (2b) is established by single crystal X-ray diffraction. These compounds show a diruthenium(II) unit bridged by four carboxylate ligands with the axial positions occupied by methanol and tetrahydrofuran molecules for 1 and 2b, respectively. Complex 1 shows, in the solid state, polymeric chains in which the molecules [Ru₂(μ-O₂CMe)₄(MeOH)₂] are linked by hydrogen bonds.     

Oxidative addition of methyl iodide to [Rh(CO)2I]2: synthesis, structure and reactivity of neutral rhodium acetyl complexes, [Rh(CO)(NCR)(COMe)I2]2

Reaction of [Rh(CO)₂I]₂ (1) with MeI in nitrile solvents gives the neutral acetyl complexes, [Rh(CO)(NCR)(COMe)I₂]₂ (R=Me, 3a; ^tBu, 3b; vinyl, 3c; allyl, 3d). Dimeric, iodide-bridged structures have been confirmed by X-ray crystallography for 3a and 3b. The complexes are centrosymmetric with approximate octahedral geometry about each Rh centre. The iodide bridges are asymmetric, with Rh-(μ-I) trans to acetyl longer than Rh-(μ-I) trans to terminal iodide. In coordinating solvents, 3a forms mononuclear complexes, [Rh(CO)(sol)₂(COMe)I₂] (sol=MeCN, MeOH). Complex 3a reacts with pyridine to give [Rh(CO)(py)(COMe)I₂]₂ and [Rh(CO)(py)₂(COMe)I₂] and with chelating diphosphines to give [Rh(Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂)(COMe)I₂] (n=2, 3, 4). Addition of MeI to [Ir(CO)₂(NCMe)I] is two orders of magnitude slower than to [Ir(CO)₂I₂]⁻. A mechanism for the reaction of 1 with MeI in MeCN is proposed, involving initial bridge cleavage by solvent to give [Rh(CO)₂(NCMe)I] and participation of the anion [Rh(CO)₂I₂]⁻ as a reactive intermediate. The possible role of neutral Rh(III) species in the mechanism of Rh-catalysed methanol carbonylation is discussed.     

Short-bite aminobis(phosphonite) containing olefinic functionalities, PhN{P(OC6H3(OMe-o)(C3H5-p))2}2: Synthesis and transition metal complexes

Short-bite aminobis(phosphonite) containing olefinic functionalities, PhN{P(OC₆H₃(OMe-o)(C₃H₅-p))₂}₂ (1) was synthesized by reacting PhN(PCl₂)₂ with eugenol in the presence of triethylamine. The ligand 1 acts as a bidentate chelating ligand toward metal complexes [M(CO)₄(C₅H₁₀NH)₂] forming [M(CO)₄{η²-PhN{P(OC₆H₃(OMe-o)(C₃H₅-p))₂}₂}] (M = Mo, 2; W, 3). The reaction between 1 and [CpFe(CO)₂]₂ leads to the cleavage of one of the P-N bonds due to the metal assisted hydrolysis to give a mononuclear complex [CpFe(CO){P(O)(OC₆H₃(OMe-o)(C₃H₅-p))₂}{PhN(H)(P(OC₆H₃(OMe-o)(C₃H₅-p))₂)}] (4). Treatment of 1 with gold(I) derivative, [AuCl(SMe₂)] resulted in the formation of a dinuclear complex, [(AuCl)₂{PhN{P(OC₆H₃(OMe-o)(C₃H₅-p))₂}₂}] (5) with a Au···Au distance of 3.118(2) Å indicating the possibility of aurophilic interactions. An equimolar reaction between 1 and [Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)Cl₂]₂ afforded a tri-chloro-bridged bimetallic complex [(η⁶-p-cymene)Ru(μ-Cl)₃Ru{PhN(P(OC₆H₃(OMe-o)(C₃H₅-p))₂)₂}Cl] (6). The crystal structures of 1-3 and 5 were established by single crystal X-ray diffraction studies.     

(C5Me5)2NbBH4, a new reagent for the synthesis of Ru and Co carbonyl clusters with interstitial boron or carbon

The reaction of Cp*₂NbBH₄ (Cp* = η⁵-C₅Me₅) with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ gave a mixture of compounds, from which only [Cp*₂Nb(CO)₂]₂[Ru₆(CO)₁₆C] (1) could be characterized by spectroscopic and crystallographic methods. ¹¹B NMR spectroscopy proved that interstitial boron may be present in other Ru₆ clusters, but these compounds did not crystallize. The reaction of Cp*₂NbBH₄ with Co₂(CO)₈ gave among others the salts [Cp*₂Nb(CO)₂]₂[Co₆(CO)₁₅C] (4) and [Cp*₂Nb(CO)₂]₃[Co₁₃(CO)₂₄C₂] (5), which were examined by X-ray diffraction studies. The true nature of the interstitial atoms in 5 was deduced from electrochemical investigations, which reveal similar redox properties as for the already known [Co₁₃(CO)₂₄C₂]³⁻ anion.     

Unexpected formation and structure elucidation of mer-[RuCl3(TMSO)(bpy)] derived from [H(TMSO)][trans-RuCl4(TMSO)2] under mild condition

Treatment of [H(TMSO)][trans-RuCl₄(TMSO)₂] (1) with 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) in ethanol at room temperature resulted an unknown mer-[RuCl₃(TMSO)(bpy)] (3) and a known cis-[RuCl₂(TMSO)₄] (4) (TMSO =  tetramethylene sulfoxide) complexes. The 3 was obtained by the substitution with bpy in mer-[RuCl₃(TMSO)₃] (2), whereas 4 was obtained by one-electron reduction of 2, suggesting that 2 is a precursor for both 3 and 4. The structure of 3 was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The reaction is a new synthetic procedure for 3 and/or 3 and 4 in mild reaction conditions from the anionic complex 1. It involves simultaneous substitution and redox reaction. This is the first known example of precisely characterized Ru(III)-chloride-TMSO-bpy-complex derived from anionic [H(TMSO)][trans-RuCl₄(TMSO)₂] at room temperature.     

Phosphane effects on formation and reactivity of [Ru(L)(PR3)(`N2Me2S2')] complexes with L=N2, N2H4, NH3, and CO

Metal-sulfur complex fragments, to which small molecules like N₂, N₂H₂, N₂H₄, NH₃, or CO can bind, are desirable model compounds concerning enzymatic N₂ fixation.This paper reports on the effects of the phosphane co-ligand on formation and reactivity of [Ru(L)(PR₃)(`N<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>')] [`N₂Me₂S₂'²⁻=1,2-ethanediamine-N,N^′-dimethyl-N,N^′-bis(2-benzenethiolate)(2−)] complexes with nitrogenase relevant ligands, especially N₂, N₂H₄, NH₃, and CO.Treatment of [Ru(NCCH₃)₄Cl₂] with Li₂`N<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>', excessive LiOMe, bulky PPh<sub>3</sub> or PCy<sub>3</sub>, respectively, led to the formation of two series of [Ru(L)(PR<sub>3</sub>)(`N₂Me₂S₂')] complexes [for R=Ph: 1b, 1c (L=NCCH₃), 6b (L=N₂H₄), 7b (L=N₂), 8b_1-3 (L=CO), 9b (L=NH₃); for R=Cy: 1a (L=NCCH₃), 6a (L=N₂H₄), 7a (L=N₂), 8a (L=CO), 9a (L=NH₃)]. While the use of PPh₃ (θ=145°) yielded cis,trans and cis,cis isomers of [Ru(NCCH₃)(PPh₃)(`N<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>')] (1b, 1c), no isomer formation was observed with the bulkier phosphane PCy<sub>3</sub> (θ=170°). Sterically less demanding phosphanes (θ=118-132°) afforded bisphosphane complexes [Ru(PR<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(`N₂Me₂S₂')] [2d (R=Me), 2e (R=Et), 2f (R=nPr), and 2g (R=nBu)], which were practically inert and could only be converted in two cases and under drastic reaction conditions into the CO complexes [Ru(CO)(PR₃)(`N<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>')] [4e (R=Et), 4f (R=nPr)]. The chelating bidentate phosphane dppe (bisdiphenylphosphanoethane) yielded exclusively the mononuclear complex [Ru(dppe)(`N₂Me₂S₂')] (3).     

Stepwise syntheses, structure and spectroscopic studies of ruthenium complexes of 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine with o-iminoquinone ancillary ligand

The ruthenium complexes [Ru^II(bbp)(L)(Cl)] (1), [Ru^II(bbp)(L)(H₂O)] (2) and [Ru^II(bbp)(L)(DMSO)] (3) {bbp = 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine, L = o-iminoquinone} have been synthesized in a stepwise manner starting from [Ru^III(bbp)Cl₃]. The single crystal X-ray structures, except for the complex 2, have been determined. All the complexes were characterized by UV-Vis, FT-IR, ¹H NMR, Mass spectroscopic techniques and cyclic voltammetry. The Ru^III/Ru^II couple for complexes 1, 2, and 3 appears at 0.63, 0.49, 0.55 V, respectively versus SCE. It is observed that complex 2, on refluxing in acetonitrile, results into [Ru^II(bbp)(L)(CH₃CN)], 4 which has been prepared earlier in a different method. The structural, spectral and electrochemical properties of complexes 1, 2 and 3 were compared to those of earlier reported complex 4, [Ru^II(bbp)(L)(CH₃CN)].     

fac-/mer-[RuCl3(NO)(P-N)] (P-N = [o-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]diphenylphosphine): Synthesis, characterization and DFT calculations

Complex fac-[RuCl₃(NO)(P-N)] (1) was synthesized from the reaction of [RuCl₃(H₂O)₂(NO)] and the P-N ligand, o-[(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]diphenylphosphine) in refluxing methanol solution, while complex mer,trans-[RuCl₃(NO)(P-N)] (2) was obtained by photochemical isomerization of (1) in dichloromethane solution. The third possible isomer mer,cis-[RuCl₃(NO)(P-N)] (3) was never observed in direct synthesis as well as in photo- or thermal-isomerization reactions. When refluxing a methanol solution of complex (2) a thermally induced isomerization occurs and complex (1) is regenerated.The complexes were characterized by NMR (³¹P{¹H}, ¹⁵N{¹H} and ¹H), cyclic voltammetry, FTIR, UV-Vis, elemental analysis and X-ray diffraction structure determination. The ³¹P{¹H} NMR revealed the presence of singlet at 35.6 for (1) and 28.3 ppm for (2). The ¹H NMR spectrum for (1) presented two singlets for the methyl hydrogens at 3.81 and 3.13 ppm, while for (2) was observed only one singlet at 3.29 ppm. FTIR Ru-NO stretching in KBr pellets or CH₂Cl₂ solution presented 1866 and 1872 cm⁻¹ for (1) and 1841 and 1860 cm⁻¹ for (2). Electrochemical analysis revealed a irreversible reduction attributed to Ru^II-NO⁺ → Ru^II-NO⁰ at −0.81 V and −0.62 V, for (1) and (2), respectively; the process Ru^II → Ru^III, as expected, is only observed around 2.0 V, for both complexes.Studies were conducted using ¹⁵NO and both complexes were isolated with ¹⁵N-enriched NO. Upon irradiation, the complex fac-[RuCl₃(NO)(P-N)] (1) does not exchange ¹⁴NO by ¹⁵NO, while complex mer,trans-[RuCl₃(NO)(P-N)] (2) does. Complex mer,trans-[RuCl₃(¹⁵NO)(P-N)] (2′) was obtained by direct reaction of mer,trans-[RuCl₃(NO)(P-N)] (2) with ¹⁵NO and the complex fac-[RuCl₃(¹⁵NO)(P-N)] (1′) was obtained by thermal-isomerization of mer,trans-[RuCl₃(¹⁵NO)(P-N)] (2′).DFT calculation on isomer energies, electronic spectra and electronic configuration were done. For complex (1) the HOMO orbital is essentially Ru (46.6%) and Cl (42.5%), for (2) Ru (57.4%) and Cl (39.0%) while LUMO orbital for (1) is based on NO (52.9%) and is less extent on Ru (38.4%), for (2) NO (58.2%) and Ru (31.5%).     

Synthesis, structure and properties of TTF-carboxylate bridged paddlewheel dirhodium complexes, Rh2(BuCO2)3(TTFCO2) and Rh2(BuCO2)2(TTFCO2)2

Reaction of tetrathiafulvalene carboxylic acid (TTFCO₂H) with paddlewheel dirhodium complex Rh₂(Bu^tCO₂)₄ yielded TTFCO₂-bridged complexes Rh₂(Bu^tCO₂)₃(TTFCO₂) (1) and cis- and trans-Rh₂(Bu^tCO₂)₂(TTFCO₂)₂ (cis- and trans-2). Their triethylamine adducts [1(NEt₃)₂] and cis-[2(NEt₃)₂] were purified and isolated with chromatographic separation, and characterized with single crystal X-ray analysis. Trans-[2(NEt₃)₂] is not completely separated from a mixture of cis- and trans-[2(NEt₃)₂], but its single crystals were obtained from a solution of the mixture. A three-step quasi-reversible oxidation process was observed for 1 in MeCN. The first two steps correspond to the oxidation of the TTFCO₂ moiety and the last one is the oxidation of the Rh₂ core. The oxidation of cis-2 is observed as a two-step process with very similar E_1/2 values to those of the first two processes for 1. Both 1⁺ and cis-2²⁺ in MeCN at room temperature show isotropic ESR spectra with a g value of 2.008 and a_H = 0.135 mT for two equivalent H atoms and a_H = 0.068 mT for one H atom. The redox and ESR data of cis-2 suggest that the intramolecular interaction between the TTF moieties is very small.     

Main group derivatives of a cyclometallated iron carbonyl anion. Crystal structures of Fe(CO)2{P(OPh)3}{(PhO)2POC6H4}(SnPh3) and two isomers of Fe(CO)2{P(OPh)3}{(PhO)2POC6H4}(I)

The iron hydrido complex HFe(CO)₂{P(OPh)₃}{(PhO)₂POC₆H₄} (1), was rapidly deprotonated by DBU or [BzMe₃N][OH] in THF to afford the new carbonyl iron anion [Fe(CO)₂{P(OPh)₃}{(PhO)₂POC₆H₄}]⁻ ([2]⁻), containing an ortho-metallated triphenyl phosphite ligand. Complex [2]⁻ reacted with triorganostannyl and plumbyl salts and with halogens to give the octahedral Fe^II compounds Fe(CO)₂{P(OPh)₃}{(PhO)₂POC₆H₄}(X) (X=SnPh₃, 3; SnMe₃, 4; PbPh₃, 5; PbMe₃, 6; Cl, 7; Br, 8; I, 9). The Group 14 complexes 3-6 were obtained in one isomeric form in which the P^III-donor atoms are mutually cis, the carbonyl ligands are cis and the P(OPh)₃ and MR₃ (M=Sn, Pb; R=Ph, Me) groups are trans as determined by solution-state IR, ³¹P and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic data. This geometry was confirmed for 3 by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. The halide complexes, however, were obtained as a mixture of isomers. The major isomer (7, X=Cl; 8a, X=Br; 9a, X=I) has cis P atoms, trans CO groups and the halide located trans to the phosphorus atom of the ortho-metallated phosphite ligand. The structure of 9a was confirmed by an X-ray diffraction study. Two other isomers, designated 8b (X=Br) and 9b (X=I), with cis P atoms and cis CO groups were isolated from the reactions of [2]⁻ with Br₂ and I₂, respectively. The structure of the latter was established by X-ray crystallography and is related to 9a by exchange of the P(OPh)₃ ligand and a carbonyl group such that the metal-bound C atom of the five-membered metallacycle is trans to CO. The stereo-geometry of 8b could not be unambiguously assigned from the spectroscopic data; however, two of the seven possible geometric isomers were suggested as plausible structures.     

Photoinduced energy transfer between Re(I) and Ru(II) termini connected through a new exo-ditopic bis-phenanthroline ligand fused to a central macrocycle spacer: Synthesis, structure, and electrochemical and photophysical properties of a heterodinuclear complex

A new ligand L¹ has been prepared in which two 1,10-phenanthroline fragments are separated by an 18-crown-6 macrocyclic spacer. This was used to prepare the heterodinuclear complex [(bipy)₂Ru(μ-L¹)Re(CO)₃Cl][PF₆]₂ [Ru(L¹)Re] in which the {Ru(bipy)₂(phen)}²⁺ and {Re(CO)Cl(phen)} chromophores are separated by a saturated and fairly flexible crown-ether fragment. On the basis of photophysical studies on Ru(L¹)Re and associated mononuclear Ru(II) and Re(I) complexes, Re → Ru photoinduced energy-transfer occurs with a rate constant of 1.9 × 10⁸ s⁻¹ in solution room temperature leading to near-complete quenching of the Re(I)-based luminescence. At 77 K the Re(I)-based luminescence component is completely quenched. Calculations on the efficiency of both Förster and Dexter energy-transfer as a function of Re?Ru distance in this system suggest that a folded conformation of the complex, in which the Re?Ru separation is much shorter than that implied by the extended conformation detected crystallographically, is responsible for the energy-transfer, since neither Förster nor Dexter Re → Ru energy-transfer should be possible with the complex in an extended conformation. Addition of K⁺ or Ba²⁺ salts to solutions of Ru(L¹)Re had no effect on the photophysical properties, probably because the association constants are too low to give significant metal-ion binding in the macrocycle at the low concentrations employed.