Role of expiratory flow limitation in determining lung volumes and ventilation during exercise.

We determined the role of expiratory flow limitation (EFL) on the ventilatory response to heavy exercise in six trained male cyclists [maximal O2 uptake = 65 +/- 8 (range 55-74) ml. kg-1. min-1] with normal lung function. Each subject completed four progressive cycle ergometer tests to exhaustion in random order: two trials while breathing N2O2 (26% O2-balance N2), one with and one without added dead space, and two trials while breathing HeO2 (26% O2-balance He), one with and one without added dead space. EFL was defined by the proximity of the tidal to the maximal flow-volume loop. With N2O2 during heavy and maximal exercise, 1) EFL was present in all six subjects during heavy [19 +/- 2% of tidal volume (VT) intersected the maximal flow-volume loop] and maximal exercise (43 +/- 8% of VT), 2) the slopes of the ventilation (DeltaVE) and peak esophageal pressure responses to added dead space (e.g., DeltaVE/DeltaPETCO2, where PETCO2 is end-tidal PCO2) were reduced relative to submaximal exercise, 3) end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) increased and end-inspiratory lung volume reached a plateau at 88-91% of total lung capacity, and 4) VT reached a plateau and then fell as work rate increased. With HeO2 (compared with N2O2) breathing during heavy and maximal exercise, 1) HeO2 increased maximal flow rates (from 20 to 38%) throughout the range of vital capacity, which reduced EFL in all subjects during tidal breathing, 2) the gains of the ventilatory and inspiratory esophageal pressure responses to added dead space increased over those during room air breathing and were similar at all exercise intensities, 3) EELV was lower and end-inspiratory lung volume remained near 90% of total lung capacity, and 4) VT was increased relative to room air breathing. We conclude that EFL or even impending EFL during heavy and maximal exercise and with added dead space in fit subjects causes EELV to increase, reduces the VT, and constrains the increase in respiratory motor output and ventilation.     

Respiratory muscle dynamics and control during exercise with externally imposed expiratory flow limitation.

To determine how decreasing velocity of shortening (U) of expiratory muscles affects breathing during exercise, six normal men performed incremental exercise with externally imposed expiratory flow limitation (EFLe) at approximately 1 l/s. We measured volumes of chest wall, lung- and diaphragm-apposed rib cage (Vrc,p and Vrc,a, respectively), and abdomen (Vab) by optoelectronic plethysmography; esophageal, gastric, and transdiaphragmatic pressures (Pdi); and end-tidal CO2 concentration. From these, we calculated velocity of shortening and power (W) of diaphragm, rib cage, and abdominal muscles (di, rcm, ab, respectively). EFLe forced a decrease in Uab, which increased Pab and which lasted well into inspiration. This imposed a load, overcome by preinspiratory diaphragm contraction. Udi and inspiratory Urcm increased, reducing their ability to generate pressure. Pdi, Prcm, and Wab increased, indicating an increased central drive to all muscle groups secondary to hypercapnia, which developed in all subjects. These results suggest a vicious cycle in which EFLe decreases Uab, increasing Pab and exacerbating the hypercapnia, which increases central drive increasing Pab even more, leading to further CO2 retention, and so forth.     

Determinants of exercise performance in normal men with externally imposed expiratory flow limitation.

To understand how externally applied expiratory flow limitation (EFL) leads to impaired exercise performance and dyspnea, we studied six healthy males during control incremental exercise to exhaustion (C) and with EFL at approximately 1. We measured volume at the mouth (Vm), esophageal, gastric and transdiaphragmatic (Pdi) pressures, maximal exercise power (W(max)) and the difference (Delta) in Borg scale ratings of breathlessness between C and EFL exercise. Optoelectronic plethysmography measured chest wall and lung volume (VL). From Campbell diagrams, we measured alveolar (PA) and expiratory muscle (Pmus) pressures, and from Pdi and abdominal motion, an index of diaphragmatic power (W(di)). Four subjects hyperinflated and two did not. EFL limited performance equally to 65% W(max) with Borg = 9-10 in both. At EFL W(max), inspiratory time (TI) was 0.66s +/- 0.08, expiratory time (TE) 2.12 +/- 0.26 s, Pmus approximately 40 cmH2O and DeltaVL-DeltaVm = 488.7 +/- 74.1 ml. From PA and VL, we calculated compressed gas volume (VC) = 163.0 +/- 4.6 ml. The difference, DeltaVL-DeltaVm-VC (estimated blood volume shift) was 326 ml +/- 66 or 7.2 ml/cmH2O PA. The high Pmus and long TE mimicked a Valsalva maneuver from which the short TI did not allow recovery. Multiple stepwise linear regression revealed that the difference between C and EFL Pmus accounted for 70.3% of the variance in DeltaBorg. DeltaW(di) added 12.5%. We conclude that high expiratory pressures cause severe dyspnea and the possibility of adverse circulatory events, both of which would impair exercise performance.     

Expiratory flow limitation during exercise in competition cyclists

In some trained athletes, maximal exerciseventilation is believed to be constrained by expiratory flow limitation(FL). Using the negative expiratory pressure method, weassessed whether FL was reached during a progressive maximal exercisetest in 10 male competition cyclists. The cyclists reached an averagemaximal O₂ consumption of 72 ml · kg¹ · min¹(range: 67-82ml · kg¹ · min¹)and ventilation of 147 l/min (range: 122-180 l/min) (88% of preexercise maximal voluntary ventilation in 15 s). In nine subjects, FL was absent at all levels of exercise (i.e., expiratory flow increased with negative expiratory pressure over the entire tidal volume range). One subject, the oldest in the group, exhibited FLduring peak exercise. The group end-expiratory lung volume (EELV)decreased during light-to-moderate exercise by 13% (range: 5-33%) of forced vital capacity but increased as maximal exercise was approached. EELV at peak exercise and at rest were notsignificantly different. The end-inspiratory lung volume increasedprogressively throughout the exercise test. The conclusions reached areas follows: 1) most well-trainedyoung cyclists do not reach FL even during maximal exercise, and,hence, mechanical ventilatory constraint does not limit their aerobicexercise capacity, and 2) in absence of FL, EELV decreases initially but increases during heavy exercise.     

Regional expiratory flow limitation studied with Technegas in asthma.

Regional expiratory flow limitation (EFL) may occur during tidal breathing without being detected by measurements of flow at the mouth. We tested this hypothesis by using Technegas to reveal sites of EFL. A first study (study 1) was undertaken to determine whether deposition of Technegas during tidal breathing reveals the occurrence of regional EFL in induced bronchoconstriction. Time-activity curves of Technegas inhaled during 12 tidal breaths were measured in four asthmatic subjects at control conditions and after exposure to inhaled methacholine at a dose sufficient to abolish expiratory flow reserve near functional residual capacity. A second study (study 2) was conducted in seven asthmatic subjects at control and after three increasing doses of methacholine to compare the pattern of Technegas deposition in the lung with the occurrence of EFL. The latter was assessed at the mouth by comparing tidal with forced expiratory flow or with the flow generated on application of a negative pressure. Study 1 documented enhanced and spotty deposition of Technegas in the central lung regions with increasing radioactivity during tidal expiration. This is consistent with increased impaction of Technegas on the airway wall downstream from the flow-limiting segment. Study 2 showed that both methods based on analysis of flow at the mouth failed to detect EFL at the time spotty deposition of Technegas occurred. We conclude that regional EFL occurs asynchronously across the lung and that methods based on mouth flow measurements are insensitive to it.     

Forced expiratory wheezes are a manifestation of airway flow limitation

To study the mechanism of generation of respiratory wheezes we examined the relationships between forced expiratory wheezes (FEW) and flow limitation in the lung. Tracheal lung sounds were measured in six healthy subjects during forced expiration through a flow-limiting valve in series with a high-impedance suction pump. Mouth pressure, esophageal pressure, transpulmonary pressure (Ptp), flow (V), and volume were also measured. For any flow rate, V was constant until the subject became flow limited. The onset of flow limitation was documented by a small change in V and a sudden change in Ptp, which was previously found by Olafsson and Hyatt to correspond to the beginning of the flow plateau of the isovolume pressure-flow curve (J. Clin. Invest. 48: 564-573, 1969). FEW started 107 +/- 45 ml (SD) after the onset of flow limitation. Additional 79 +/- 65 ml were exhaled between the onset of FEW to the final sharp drop in V. The frequency spectra of FEW were the same as those of respiratory wheezes found in obstructive airway diseases. Administration of inhaled bronchodilator (isoproterenol) did not eliminate the FEW, nor did it change their relationship to flow limitation. The sequence of events around the onset of FEW, and the tight correlation with the onset of flow limitation correspond well to recent experimental observations on the onset of flutter in collapsible, thick-walled latex tubes.     

Effect of helium breathing on intercostal and quadriceps muscle blood flow during exercise in COPD patients

Emerging evidence indicates that, besides dyspnea relief, an improvement in locomotor muscle oxygen delivery may also contribute to enhanced exercise tolerance following normoxic heliox (replacement of inspired nitrogen by helium) administration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Whether blood flow redistribution from intercostal to locomotor muscles contributes to this improvement currently remains unknown. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to investigate whether such redistribution plays a role in improving locomotor muscle oxygen delivery while breathing heliox at near-maximal [75% peak work rate (WR(peak))], maximal (100%WR(peak)), and supramaximal (115%WR(peak)) exercise in COPD. Intercostal and vastus lateralis muscle perfusion was measured in 10 COPD patients (FEV(1) = 50.5 ± 5.5% predicted) by near-infrared spectroscopy using indocyanine green dye. Patients undertook exercise tests at 75 and 100%WR(peak) breathing either air or heliox and at 115%WR(peak) breathing heliox only. Patients did not exhibit exercise-induced hyperinflation. Normoxic heliox reduced respiratory muscle work and relieved dyspnea across all exercise intensities. During near-maximal exercise, quadriceps and intercostal muscle blood flows were greater, while breathing normoxic heliox compared with air (35.8 ± 7.0 vs. 29.0 ± 6.5 and 6.0 ± 1.3 vs. 4.9 ± 1.2 ml·min(-1)·100 g(-1), respectively; P < 0.05; mean ± SE). In addition, compared with air, normoxic heliox administration increased arterial oxygen content, as well as oxygen delivery to quadriceps and intercostal muscles (from 47 ± 9 to 60 ± 12, and from 8 ± 1 to 13 ± 3 mlO(2)·min(-1)·100 g(-1), respectively; P < 0.05). In contrast, normoxic heliox had neither an effect on systemic nor an effect on quadriceps or intercostal muscle blood flow and oxygen delivery during maximal or supramaximal exercise. Since intercostal muscle blood flow did not decrease by normoxic heliox administration, blood flow redistribution from intercostal to locomotor muscles does not represent a likely mechanism of improvement in locomotor muscle oxygen delivery. Our findings might not be applicable to patients who hyperinflate during exercise.     

Evaluation of pulmonary resistance and maximal expiratory flow measurements during exercise in humans.

To evaluate methods used to document changes in airway function during and after exercise, we studied nine subjects with exercise-induced asthma and five subjects without asthma. Airway function was assessed from measurements of pulmonary resistance (RL) and forced expiratory vital capacity maneuvers. In the asthmatic subjects, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) fell 24 +/- 14% and RL increased 176 +/- 153% after exercise, whereas normal subjects experienced no change in airway function (RL -3 +/- 8% and FEV1 -4 +/- 5%). During exercise, there was a tendency for FEV1 to increase in the asthmatic subjects but not in the normal subjects. RL, however, showed a slight increase during exercise in both groups. Changes in lung volumes encountered during exercise were small and had no consistent effect on RL. The small increases in RL during exercise could be explained by the nonlinearity of the pressure-flow relationship and the increased tidal breathing flows associated with exercise. In the asthmatic subjects, a deep inspiration (DI) caused a small, significant, transient decrease in RL 15 min after exercise. There was no change in RL in response to DI during exercise in either asthmatic or nonasthmatic subjects. When percent changes in RL and FEV1 during and after exercise were compared, there was close agreement between the two measurements of change in airway function. In the groups of normal and mildly asthmatic subjects, we conclude that changes in lung volume and DIs had no influence on RL during exercise. Increases in tidal breathing flows had only minor influence on measurements of RL during exercise. Furthermore, changes in RL and in FEV1 produce equivalent indexes of the variations in airway function during and after exercise.     

Peak flowmeter resistance decreases peak expiratory flow in subjects with COPD.

Previous studies have shown that the added resistance of a mini-Wright peak expiratory flow (PEF) meter reduced PEF by approximately 8% in normal subjects because of gas compression reducing thoracic gas volume at PEF and thus driving elastic recoil pressure. We undertook a body plethysmographic study in 15 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), age 65.9 +/- 6.3 yr (mean +/- SD, range 53-75 yr), to examine whether their recorded PEF was also limited by the added resistance of a PEF meter. The PEF meter increased alveolar pressure at PEF (Ppeak) from 3.7 +/- 1.4 to 4.7 +/- 1.5 kPa (P = 0.01), and PEF was reduced from 3.6 +/- 1.3 l/s to 3.2 +/- 0.9 l/s (P = 0.01). The influence of flow limitation on PEF and Ppeak was evaluated by a simple four-parameter model based on the wave-speed concept. We conclude that added external resistance in patients with COPD reduced PEF by the same mechanisms as in healthy subjects. Furthermore, the much lower Ppeak in COPD patients is a consequence of more severe flow limitation than in healthy subjects and not of deficient muscle strength.     

A new technique to demonstrate flow limitation in partial expiratory flow-volume curves in infants

Partial expiratory flow-volume (PEFV) curves in infants are generated by applying a compressive pressure over the chest wall with an inflatable jacket. This study addresses two issues: pressure transmission to and across the chest wall and whether flow limitation can be identified. Eleven infants sedated with chloral hydrate were studied. Pressure transmission to the chest wall, measured with neonatal blood pressure cuffs placed on the infant's body surface, was 72 +/- 4% of jacket pressure during compression maneuvers. The pressure transmission to the air spaces, determined by measuring airway pressure during a compression maneuver against an occluded airway, was 56 +/- 6% of jacket pressure. A significant amount of the applied pressure is therefore lost across both the jacket and chest wall. Rapid pressure oscillations (RPO) were superimposed on static jacket pressures while expiratory flow was measured. Absence of associated oscillations of flow measured at the mouth was taken to indicate that flow was independent of driving pressure and therefore limited. Flow limitation was demonstrable with the RPO technique in all infants for jacket pressures greater than 50 cmH2O; however, it was evident at jacket pressures less than 30 cmH2O jacket pressure in four infants with obstructive airway disease. The RPO technique is a useful adjunct to the compression maneuver utilized to generate PEFV curves in infants because it facilitates the recognition of expiratory flow limitation.     

Effect of expiratory flow limitation on respiratory mechanical impedance: a model study

Peslin, R., R. Farré, M. Rotger, and D. Navajas.Effect of expiratory flow limitation on respiratory mechanicalimpedance: a model study. J. Appl.Physiol. 81(6): 2399-2406, 1996.Large phasicvariations of respiratory mechanical impedance (Zrs) have been observedduring induced expiratory flow limitation (EFL) (M. Vassiliou, R. Peslin, C. Saunier, and C. Duvivier. Eur. Respir. J. 9: 779-786, 1996). To clarify themeaning of Zrs during EFL, we have measured from 5 to 30 Hz the inputimpedance (Zin) of mechanical analogues of the respiratory system,including flow-limiting elements (FLE) made of easily collapsiblerubber tubing. The pressures upstream (Pus) and downstream (Pds) fromthe FLE were controlled and systematically varied. Maximal flow(max) increased linearly with Pus, was close to thevalue predicted from wave-speed theory, and was obtained for Pus-Pds of4-6 hPa. The real part of Zin started increasing abruptlywith flow () >85%max and either further increased or suddenlydecreased in the vicinity of max. The imaginary part of Zin decreased markedly and suddenly above 95%max. Similar variations of Zin during EFL were seenwith an analogue that mimicked the changes of airwaytransmural pressure during breathing. After pressure and measurements upstream and downstream from the FLEwere combined, the latter was analyzed in terms of a serial (Zs) and ashunt (Zp) compartment. Zs was consistent with a large resistance andinertance, and Zp with a mainly elastic element having an elastanceclose to that of the tube walls. We conclude that Zrs data during EFLmainly reflect the properties of the FLE.

     

Renal blood flow in heart failure patients during exercise

During exercise, reflex renal vasoconstriction maintains blood pressure and helps in redistributing blood flow to the contracting muscle. Exercise intolerance in heart failure (HF) is thought to involve diminished perfusion in active muscle. We studied the temporal relationship between static handgrip (HG) and renal blood flow velocity (RBV; duplex ultrasound) in 10 HF and in 9 matched controls during 3 muscle contraction paradigms. Fatiguing HG (protocol 1) at 40% of maximum voluntary contraction led to a greater reduction in RBV in HF compared with controls (group main effect: P <0.05). The reduction in RBV early in HG tended to be more prominent during the early phases of protocol 1. Similar RBV was observed in the two groups during post-HG circulatory arrest (isolating muscle metaboreflex). Short bouts (15 s) of HG at graded intensities (protocol 2; engages muscle mechanoreflex and/or central command) led to greater reductions in RBV in HF than controls (P <0.03). Protocol 3, voluntary and involuntary biceps contraction (eliminates central command), led to similar increases in renal vasoconstriction in HF (n=4). Greater reductions in RBV were found in HF than in controls during the early phases of exercise. This effect was not likely due to a metaboreflex or central command. Thus our data suggest that muscle mechanoreflex activity is enhanced in HF and serves to vigorously vasoconstrict the kidney. We believe this compensatory mechanism helps preserve blood flow to exercising muscle in HF.