RF3:GTP promotes rapid dissociation of the class 1 termination factor

Translation termination is promoted by class 1 and class 2 release factors in all domains of life. While the role of the bacterial class 1 factors, RF1 and RF2, in translation termination is well understood, the precise contribution of the bacterial class 2 release factor, RF3, to this process remains less clear. Here, we use a combination of binding assays and pre-steady state kinetics to provide a kinetic and thermodynamic framework for understanding the role of the translational GTPase RF3 in bacterial translation termination. First, we find that GDP and GTP have similar affinities for RF3 and that, on average, the t_1/2 for nucleotide dissociation from the protein is 1–2 min. We further show that RF3:GDPNP, but not RF3:GDP, tightly associates with the ribosome pre- and post-termination complexes. Finally, we use stopped-flow fluorescence to demonstrate that RF3:GTP enhances RF1 dissociation rates by over 500-fold, providing the first direct observation of this step. Importantly, catalytically inactive variants of RF1 are not rapidly dissociated from the ribosome by RF3:GTP, arguing that a rotated state of the ribosome must be sampled for this step to efficiently occur. Together, these data define a more precise role for RF3 in translation termination and provide insights into the function of this family of translational GTPases.     

Mutations at the accommodation gate of the ribosome impair RF2-dependent translation termination

During protein synthesis, aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) and release factors 1 and 2 (RF1 and RF2) have to bind at the catalytic center of the ribosome on the 50S subunit where they take part in peptide bond formation or peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, respectively. Computer simulations of aa-tRNA movement into the catalytic site (accommodation) suggested that three nucleotides of 23S rRNA, U2492, C2556, and C2573, form a “gate” at which aa-tRNA movement into the A site is retarded. Here we examined the role of nucleotides C2573 of 23S rRNA, a part of the putative accommodation gate, and of the neighboring A2572 for aa-tRNA binding followed by peptide bond formation and for the RF2-dependent peptide release. Mutations at the two positions did not affect aa-tRNA accommodation, peptide bond formation, or the fidelity of aa-tRNA selection, but impaired RF2-catalyzed peptide release. The data suggest that the ribosome is a robust machine that allows rapid aa-tRNA accommodation despite the defects at the accommodation gate. In comparison, peptide release by RF2 appears more sensitive to these mutations, due to slower accommodation of the factor or effects on RF2 positioning in the A site.     

Making sense of mimic in translation termination

The mechanism of translation termination has long been a puzzle. Recent crystallographic evidence suggests that the eukaryotic release factor (eRF1), the bacterial release factor (RF2) and the ribosome recycling factor (RRF) all mimic a tRNA structure, whereas biochemical and genetic evidence supports the idea of a tripeptide 'anticodon' in bacterial release factors RF1 and RF2. However, the suggested structural mimicry of RF2 is not in agreement with the tripeptide 'anticodon' hypothesis and, furthermore, recently determined structures using cryo-electron microscopy show that, when bound to the ribosome, RF2 has a conformation that is distinct from the RF2 crystal structure. In addition, hydroxyl-radical probings of RRF on the ribosome are not in agreement with the simple idea that RRF mimics tRNA in the ribosome A-site. All of this evidence seriously questions the simple concept of structural mimicry between proteins and RNA and, thus, leaves only functional mimicry of protein factors of translation to be investigated.     

Escherichia coli release factor 3: resolving the paradox of a typical G protein structure and atypical function with guanine nucleotides.

Escherichia coli release factor 3 (RF3) is a G protein involved in the termination of protein synthesis that stimulates the activity of the stop signal decoding release factors RF1 and RF2. Paradoxically for a G protein, both GDP and GTP have been reported to modulate negatively the activity of nucleotide-free RF3 in vitro. Using a direct ribosome binding assay, we found that RF3xGDPCP, a GTP analogue form of RF3, has a 10-fold higher affinity for ribosomes than the GDP form of the protein, and that RF3xGDPCP binds to the ribosome efficiently in the absence of the decoding release factors. These effects show that RF3 binds to the ribosome as a classical translational G protein, and suggest that the paradoxical inhibitory effect of GTP on RF3 activity in vitro is most likely due to untimely and unproductive ribosome-mediated GTP hydrolysis. Nucleotide-free RF3 has an intermediate activity and its binding to the ribosome exhibits positive cooperativity with RF2. This cooperativity is absent, however, in the presence of GDPCP. The observed activities of nucleotide-free RF3 suggest that it mimics a transition state of RF3 in which the protein interacts with the decoding release factor while it enhances the efficiency of the termination reaction.     

Translation termination and its regulation in eukaryotes: recent insights provided by studies in yeast

In protein synthesis, the arrival of one or other of the three stop codons in the ribosomal A-site triggers the binding of a release factor (RF) to the ribosome and subsequent polypeptide chain release. In eukaryotes, the RF is composed of two proteins, eRF1 and eRF3. eRF1 is responsible for the hydrolysis of the peptidyl-tRNA, while eRF3 provides a GTP-dependent function, although its precise role remains to be defined. Recent findings on translation termination and its regulation from studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are reviewed and the potential role of eRF3 is discussed.     

Release factor RF3 in E.coli accelerates the dissociation of release factors RF1 and RF2 from the ribosome in a GTP-dependent manner.

Ribosomes complexed with synthetic mRNA and peptidyl-tRNA, ready for peptide release, were purified by gel filtration and used to study the function of release factor RF3 and guanine nucleotides in the termination of protein synthesis. The peptide-releasing activity of RF1 and RF2 in limiting concentrations was stimulated by the addition of RF3 and GTP, stimulated, though to a lesser extent, by RF3 and a non-hydrolysable GTP analogue, and inhibited by RF3 and GDP or RF3 without guanine nucleotide. With short incubation times allowing only a single catalytic cycle of RF1 or RF2, peptide release activity was independent of RF3 and guanine nucleotide. RF3 hydrolysis of GTP to GDP + P(i) was dependent only on ribosomes and not on RF1 or RF2. RF3 affected neither the rate of association of RF1 and RF2 with the ribosome nor the catalytic rate of peptide release. A model is proposed which explains how RF3 recycles RF1 and RF2 by displacing the factors from the ribosome after the release of peptide.     

Another burst of smoke: atomic resolution structures of RF3 bound to the ribosome

Two recent reports provide atomic resolution information detailing the interaction of the class II release factor, RF3, with the bacterial ribosome. Differences in the composition of the two crystal forms allow us to learn a considerable amount about how translational GTPases engage the ribosome to facilitate and define conformational rearrangements involved in protein synthesis.     

Distinct Roles for Release Factor 1 and Release Factor 2 in Translational Quality Control

In bacteria, stop codons are recognized by two similar class 1 release factors, release factor 1 (RF1) and release factor 2 (RF2). Normally, during termination, the class 2 release factor 3 (RF3), a GTPase, functions downstream of peptide release where it accelerates the dissociation of RF1/RF2 prior to ribosome recycling. In addition to their canonical function in termination, both classes of release factor are also involved in a post peptidyl transfer quality control (post PT QC) mechanism where the termination factors recognize mismatched (i.e. error-containing) ribosome complexes and promote premature termination. Here, using a well defined in vitro system, we explored the role of release factors in canonical termination and post PT QC. As reported previously, during canonical termination, RF1 and RF2 recognize stop codons in a similar manner, and RF3 accelerates their rate of dissociation. During post PT QC, only RF2 (and not RF1) effectively binds to mismatched ribosome complexes; and whereas the addition of RF3 to RF2 increased its rate of release on mismatched complexes, the addition of RF3 to RF1 inhibited its rate of release but increased the rate of peptidyl-tRNA dissociation. Our data strongly suggest that RF2, in addition to its primary role in peptide release, functions as the principle factor for post PT QC.     

Timing of GTP binding and hydrolysis by translation termination factor RF3

Protein synthesis in bacteria is terminated by release factors 1 or 2 (RF1/2), which, on recognition of a stop codon in the decoding site on the ribosome, promote the hydrolytic release of the polypeptide from the transfer RNA (tRNA). Subsequently, the dissociation of RF1/2 is accelerated by RF3, a guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) that hydrolyzes GTP during the process. Here we show that—in contrast to a previous report—RF3 binds GTP and guanosine diphosphate (GDP) with comparable affinities. Furthermore, we find that RF3–GTP binds to the ribosome and hydrolyzes GTP independent of whether the P site contains peptidyl-tRNA (pre-termination state) or deacylated tRNA (post-termination state). RF3–GDP in either pre- or post-termination complexes readily exchanges GDP for GTP, and the exchange is accelerated when RF2 is present on the ribosome. Peptide release results in the stabilization of the RF3–GTP–ribosome complex, presumably due to the formation of the hybrid/rotated state of the ribosome, thereby promoting the dissociation of RF1/2. GTP hydrolysis by RF3 is virtually independent of the functional state of the ribosome and the presence of RF2, suggesting that RF3 acts as an unregulated ribosome-activated switch governed by its internal GTPase clock.     

Crystal structures of the ribosome in complex with release factors RF1 and RF2 bound to a cognate stop codon

During protein synthesis, translational release factors catalyze the release of the polypeptide chain when a stop codon on the mRNA reaches the A site of the ribosome. The detailed mechanism of this process is currently unknown. We present here the crystal structures of the ribosome from Thermus thermophilus with RF1 and RF2 bound to their cognate stop codons, at resolutions of 5.9 Angstrom and 6.7 Angstrom, respectively. The structures reveal details of interactions of the factors with the ribosome and mRNA, including elements previously implicated in decoding and peptide release. They also shed light on conformational changes both in the factors and in the ribosome during termination. Differences seen in the interaction of RF1 and RF2 with the L11 region of the ribosome allow us to rationalize previous biochemical data. Finally, this work demonstrates the feasibility of crystallizing ribosomes with bound factors at a defined state along the translational pathway.     

GTPases of the Translation Apparatus

Protein biosynthesis is a complex biochemical process involving a number of stages at which different translation factors specifically interact with ribosome. Some of these factors belong to GTP-binding proteins, or G-proteins. Due to their functioning, GTP is hydrolyzed to yield GDP and the inorganic phosphate ion P_i. Interaction with ribosome enhances GTPase activity of translation factors; i.e., ribosome plays a role of GTPase-activating protein (GAP). GTPases involved in translation interact with ribosome at every stage of protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 (IF2) catalyzes initiator tRNA binding to the ribosome P site and subsequent binding of the 50S subunit to the initiation complex of the 30S subunit. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) controls aminoacyl-tRNA delivery to the ribosome A site, while elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex by one codon on the ribosome. Release factor 3 (RF3) catalyzes the release of termination factors 1 or 2 (RF1 or RF2) from the ribosomal complex after completion of protein synthesis and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. The functional properties of translational GTPases as related to other G-proteins, the putative mechanism of GTP hydrolysis, structural features, and the functional cycles of translational GTPases are considered.     

八肋游仆虫两类释放因子的相互作用

从八肋游仆虫中克隆到两类释放因子基因Eo-eRFI和Eo-eRF3。在Eo-eRF3基因的阅读框中有3个通用的终止密码子UGA,在此编码半胱氨酸。为了研究两类释放因子的相互作用,用PCR的方法对3个位点进行了定点突变,将UGA突变为通用的编码半胱氨酸的密码子UGU。突变结果经测序确认后,在大肠杆菌中获得全长Eo-eRF3的正确表达。在此基础上,构建酵母双杂交重组质粒,用该系统检测了游仆虫两类释放因子的相互作用。结果显示,两类释放因子在生物体内形成复合体,从而在较原始的真核生物中,证实了两类释放因子的相互作用关系。     

Molecular recognition and catalysis in translation termination complexes

When the ribosome machinery reaches a stop codon in the mRNA, protein synthesis stops, and nascent polypeptide release is catalysed by class-I release factors (RFs); class-II RFs then promote the release of class-I RFs. Cryo electron microscopy structures of termination complexes and crystal structures of isolated factors have provided insights into key concepts such as bridging of active sites on the ribosome, and conformational changes that regulate the termination process. Recent crystal structures of the four possible functional ribosome complexes that contain the class-I RFs and the three stop codons have uncovered the molecular mechanisms by which RF1/RF2 (i) both recognise UAA, but discriminate specifically between UAG and UGA, and (ii) catalyse peptide release. Moreover, ongoing research also promises to reveal the structure-function relations of class-II RFs.     

Release factors and their role as decoding proteins: specificity and fidelity for termination of protein synthesis

The decoding of stop signals in mRNA requires protein release factors. Two classes of factor are found in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, a decoding factor and a stimulatory recycling factor. These factors form complexes at the active centre of the ribosome and mimic in overall shape the complexes found at other stages of protein synthesis. The decoding release factor is shaped like a tRNA and has a domain for codon recognition at the decoding site of the ribosome, and a domain for peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis that is inferred to be near the peptidyltransferase centre. Initial interaction of the decoding factor with the ribosome is a low fidelity event involving multiple contacts with the ribosomal components. A subsequent discrimination step, at present poorly defined, ensures high fidelity of codon recognition.     

Ribosome release factor RF4 and termination factor RF3 are involved in dissociation of peptidyl-tRNA from the ribosome.

Peptidyl-tRNA dissociation from ribosomes is an energetically costly but apparently inevitable process that accompanies normal protein synthesis. The drop-off products of these events are hydrolysed by peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase. Mutant selections have been made to identify genes involved in the drop-off of peptidyl-tRNA, using a thermosensitive peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase mutant in Escherichia coli. Transposon insertions upstream of the frr gene, which encodes RF4 (ribosome release or recycling factor), restored growth to this mutant. The insertions impaired expression of the frr gene. Mutations inactivating prfC, encoding RF3 (release factor 3), displayed a similar phenotype. Conversely, production of RF4 from a plasmid increased the thermosensitivity of the peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase mutant. In vitro measurements of peptidyl-tRNA release from ribosomes paused at stop signals or sense codons confirmed that RF3 and RF4 were able to stimulate peptidyl-tRNA release from ribosomes, and showed that this action of RF4 required the presence of translocation factor EF2, known to be needed for the function of RF4 in ribosome recycling. When present together, the three factors were able to stimulate release up to 12-fold. It is suggested that RF4 may displace peptidyl-tRNA from the ribosome in a manner related to its proposed function in removing deacylated tRNA during ribosome recycling.     

Accommodating the bacterial decoding release factor as an alien protein among the RNAs at the active site of the ribosome

The decoding release factor （RF） triggers termination of protein synthesis by functionally mimicking a tRNA to span the decoding centre and the peptidyl transferase centre （PTC） of the ribosome. Structurally, it must fit into a site crafted for a tRNA and surrounded by five other RNAs, namely the adjacent peptidyl tRNA carrying the completed polypeptide, the mRNA and the three rRNAs. This is achieved by extending a structural domain from the body of the protein that results in a critical conformational change allowing it to contact the PTC. A structural model of the bacterial termination complex with the accommodated RF shows that it makes close contact with the first, second and third bases of the stop codon in the mRNA with two separate loops of structure＂ the anticodon loop and the loop at the tip of helix orS. The anticodon loop also makes contact with the base following the stop codon that is known to strongly influence termination efficiency. It confirms the close contact of domain 3 of the protein with the key RNA structures of the PTC. The mRNA signal for termination includes sequences upstream as well as downstream of the stop codon, and this may reflect structural restrictions for specific combinations of tRNA and RF to be bound onto the ribosome together. An unbiased SELEX approach has been investigated as a tool to identify potential rRNA-binding contacts of the bacterial RF in its different binding conformations within the active centre of the ribosome.     

Pseudouridylation of 23S rRNA helix 69 promotes peptide release by release factor RF2 but not by release factor RF1

Pseudouridine [Ψ] is a frequent base modification in the ribosomal RNA [rRNA] and may be involved in the modulation of the conformational flexibility of rRNA helix-loop structures during protein synthesis. Helix 69 of 23S rRNA contains pseudouridines at the positions 1911, 1915 and 1917 which are formed by the helix 69-specific synthase RluD. The growth defect caused by the lack of RluD can be rescued by mutations in class I release factor RF2, indicating a role for helix 69 pseudouridines in translation termination. We investigated the role of helix 69 pseudouridines in peptide release by release factors RF1 and RF2 in an in vitro system consisting of purified components of the Escherichia coli translation apparatus. Lack of all three pseudouridines in helix 69 compromised the activity of RF2 about 3-fold but did not significantly affect the activity of RF1. Reintroduction of pseudouridines into helix 69 by RluD-treatment restored the activity of RF2 in peptide release. A Ψ-to-C substitution at the 1917 position caused an increase in the dissociation rate of RF1 and RF2 from the postrelease ribosome. Our results indicate that the presence of all three pseudouridines in helix 69 stimulates peptide release by RF2 but has little effect on the activity of RF1. The interactions around the pseudouridine at the 1917 position appear to be most critical for a proper interaction of helix 69 with release factors.     

RF3 induces ribosomal conformational changes responsible for dissociation of class I release factors

During translation termination, class II release factor RF3 binds to the ribosome to promote rapid dissociation of a class I release factor (RF) in a GTP-dependent manner. We present the crystal structure of E. coli RF3*GDP, which has a three-domain architecture strikingly similar to the structure of EF-Tu*GTP. Biochemical data on RF3 mutants show that a surface region involving domains II and III is important for distinct steps in the action cycle of RF3. Furthermore, we present a cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the posttermination ribosome bound with RF3 in the GTP form. Our data show that RF3*GTP binding induces large conformational changes in the ribosome, which break the interactions of the class I RF with both the decoding center and the GTPase-associated center of the ribosome, apparently leading to the release of the class I RF.     

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Insights into Stop Codon Recognition by Release Factor 1

Stop codon recognition is a crucial event during translation termination and is performed by class I release factors (RF1 and RF2 in bacterial cells). Recent crystal structures showed that stop codon recognition is achieved mainly through a network of hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions between the stop codon and conserved residues in domain II of RF1/RF2. Additionally, previous studies suggested that recognition of stop codons is coupled to proper positioning of RF1 on the ribosome, which is essential for triggering peptide release. In this study we mutated four conserved residues in Escherichia coli RF1 (Gln185, Arg186, Thr190, and Thr198) that are proposed to be critical for discriminating stop codons from sense codons. Our thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of these RF1 mutants showed that the mutations inhibited the binding of RF1 to the ribosome. However, the mutations in RF1 did not affect the rate of peptide release, showing that imperfect recognition of the stop codon does not affect the proper positioning of RF1 on the ribosome.