Antisense-induced ribosomal frameshifting

Programmed ribosomal frameshifting provides a mechanism to decode information located in two overlapping reading frames by diverting a proportion of translating ribosomes into a second open reading frame (ORF). The result is the production of two proteins: the product of standard translation from ORF1 and an ORF1–ORF2 fusion protein. Such programmed frameshifting is commonly utilized as a gene expression mechanism in viruses that infect eukaryotic cells and in a subset of cellular genes. RNA secondary structures, consisting of pseudoknots or stem–loops, located downstream of the shift site often act as cis-stimulators of frameshifting. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that antisense oligonucleotides can functionally mimic these RNA structures to induce +1 ribosomal frameshifting when annealed downstream of the frameshift site, UCC UGA. Antisense-induced shifting of the ribosome into the +1 reading frame is highly efficient in both rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation reactions and in cultured mammalian cells. The efficiency of antisense-induced frameshifting at this site is responsive to the sequence context 5′ of the shift site and to polyamine levels.     

Yeast ribosomal proteins

Summary Homology maps between bacteriophages 81, 80 and were constructed on the basis of electron microscope observation of DNA heteroduplexes. In 81/80 heteroduplex, the left half and the right terminal region of 13% the total molecular length were highly homologous, while the remaining region covering the early gene cluster was entirely nonhomologous. In 81/ heteroduplex, high-degree homologies were detected at the left 14% terminal region covering the head gene cluster, the central 3.8% region covering the att-int-xis region and the 1.3% Q homology region. Low-degree homologies of shorter length were scattered at the tail gene cluster, b2 region, cIII region, PQ region and SR region. Comparing our results with the homology maps of other lambdoid phages reported by Simon et al. (1971) and Fiandt et al. (1971), a phylogenic relation of 81 to other lambdoid phages and the role of recombination in the course of divergence of lambdoid phages are discussed.     

Fungal ribosomal vaccines

A crude ribosomal fraction was extracted from Microsporum canis. The ratio of spectrophotometric readings at 260 and 280 nm was 1.56 and the nucleic acid to protein ratio of the fraction was 1.5. A delayed intradermal hypersensitivity test in guinea pigs was positive and dose related.     

Involvement of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins in ribosomal RNA-mediated protein folding

The peptidyl transferase center of the domain V of large ribosomal RNA in the prokaryotic and eukaryotic cytosolic ribosomes acts as general protein folding modulator. We showed earlier that one part of the domain V (RNA1 containing the peptidyl transferase loop) binds unfolded protein and directs it to a folding competent state (FCS) that is released by the other part (RNA2) to attain the folded native state by itself. Here we show that the peptidyl transferase loop of the mitochondrial ribosome releases unfolded proteins in FCS extremely slowly despite its lack of the rRNA segment analogous to RNA2. The release of FCS can be hastened by the equivalent activity of RNA2 or the large subunit proteins of the mitochondrial ribosome. The RNA2 or large subunit proteins probably introduce some allosteric change in the peptidyl transferase loop to enable it to release proteins in FCS.     

Ribonuclease-sensitive ribosomal vaccines

This paper presents an analysis of the protective properties of the components in ribonuclease (RNase)-sensitive ribosomal vaccines, in particular the ribonucleic acid (RNA). The protective activities in mice of purified ribosomes derived fromPseudomonas aeruginosa and fromListeria monocytogenes were compared. Both ribosomal vaccines had to be combined with the adjuvant dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide (DDA) in order to be protective, and both lost their activity after RNase treatment. The ribosomal vaccines as well as RNA purified from the ribosomes induced non-specific protection. Intraperitoneal injection of RNA with DDA induced an influx of peritoneal cells. Furthermore, RNA with DDA activated macrophages as shown by, a.o., enhanced phagocytic activity and killing capacity forL. monocytogenes. The results suggest that the observed macrophage activation is probably T-cell-independent. With regard to the ribosomal vaccine ofP. aeruginosa it is concluded that RNA also contributed to the protective activity by increasing the humoral response against suboptimal concentrations of contaminating cell surface antigens. In conclusion, it is proposed that ribosomal vaccines may be considered as a combination of a non-specific immunomodulator (RNA) with pathogen-specific cell surface antigens. This concept of ribosomal vaccines is discussed in relation to the literature concerning RNase-sensitive ribosomal vaccines.     

Interactions of ribosomal protein L1 with ribosomal and messenger RNAs

Crystal structures of unbound protein L1 and of its complexes with ribosomal an messenger RNAs are analyzed. It is shown that the values of the apparent association rate constant for L1-RNA depend on conformation of unbound protein L1. It is suggested that L1 binds to rRNA with higher affinity than to mRNA because of additional interactions between domain II of L1 and the loop rRNA region, which is absent in mRNA.     

Do ribosomal RNAs act merely as scaffold for ribosomal proteins?

Investigations that are being carried out in various laboratories including ours clearly provide the answer which is in the negative. Only the direct evidences obtained in this laboratory will be presented and discussed. It has been unequivocally shown that the interaction between 16S and 23S RNAs plays the primary role in the association of ribosomal subunits. Further, 23S RNA is responsible for the Binding of 5S RNA to 16S.23S RNA complex with the help of three ribosomal proteins, L5, L18, L15/L25. The 16S.23S RNA complex is also capable of carrying out the following ribosomal functions, although to small but significant extents, with the help of a very limited number of ribosomal proteins and the factors involved in protein synthesis: (a) poly U-Binding, (B) poly U-dependent Binding of phenylalanyl tRNA, (c) EF-G-dependent GTPase activity, (d) initiation complex formation, (e) peptidyl transferase activity (puromycin reaction) and (f) polyphenylalanine synthesis. These results clearly indicate the direct involvement of rRNAs in the various steps of protein synthesis. Very recently it has Been demonstrated that the conformational change of 23S RNA is responsible for the translocation of peptidyl tRNA from the aminoacyl (A) site to the peptidyl (P) site. A model has Been proposed for translocation on the Basis of direct experimental evidences. The new concept that ribosomal RNAs are the functional components in ribosomes and proteins act as control switches may eventually turn out to Be noncontroversial.     

Interactions of ribosomal protein L1 with ribosomal and messenger RNAs

The crystal structures of unbound protein L1 and its complexes with ribosomal and messenger RNAs were analyzed. The apparent association rate constants for L1-RNA complexes proved to depend on the conformation of unbound L1. It was suggested that L1 binds to rRNA with a higher affinity than to mRNA, owing to additional interactions between domain II of L1 and the loop rRNA region, which is absent in mRNA. Published in Russian in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2006, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 650–657. The article was translated by the authors.     

Adenylate-rich oligonucleotides of ribosomal and ribosomal precursor RNA from HeLa cells

HeLa cell ribosomal precursor (45S) RNA has been found to contain nucleotide sequences also found in 18S RNA and others found in 28S RNA. Thus, 18S RNA and 28S RNA are readily distinguishable, whereas 45S RNA is similar to 18S and 28S RNA combined. The nucleotide sequences analysed were those resistant to the combined action of pancreatic and T1 ribonucleases.     

The acidic ribosomal proteins as regulators of the eukaryotic ribosomal activity

The acidic proteins, A-proteins, from the large ribosomal subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown under different conditions have been quantitatively estimated by ELISA tests using rabbit sera specific for these polypeptides. It has been found that the amount of A-protein present in the ribosome is not constant and depends on the metabolic state of the cell. Ribosomes from exponentially growing cultures have about 40% more of these proteins than those from stationary phase. Similarly, the particles forming part of the polysomes are enriched in A-proteins as compared with the free 80 S ribosomes. The cytoplasmic pool of A-protein is considerably high, containing as a whole as much protein as the total ribosome population. These results are compatible with an exchanging process of the acidic proteins during protein synthesis that can regulate the activity of the ribosome. On the other hand, cells inhibited with different metabolic inhibitors produce a very low yield of ribosomes that contain, however, a surprisingly high amount of acidic proteins while the cytoplasmic pool is considerably reduced, suggesting that under stress conditions the ribosome and the A-protein may aggregate, forming complex structures that are not recovered by the standard preparation methods.