The Bcl-2 Homology Domain 3 (BH3)-only Proteins Bim and Bid Are Functionally Active and Restrained by Anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 Family Proteins in Healthy Liver

An intrinsic pathway of apoptosis is regulated by the B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family proteins. We previously reported that a fine rheostatic balance between the anti- and pro-apoptotic multidomain Bcl-2 family proteins controls hepatocyte apoptosis in the healthy liver. The Bcl-2 homology domain 3 (BH3)-only proteins set this rheostatic balance toward apoptosis upon activation in the diseased liver. However, their involvement in healthy Bcl-2 rheostasis remains unknown. In the present study, we focused on two BH3-only proteins, Bim and Bid, and we clarified the Bcl-2 network that governs hepatocyte life and death in the healthy liver. We generated hepatocyte-specific Bcl-xL- or Mcl-1-knock-out mice, with or without disrupting Bim and/or Bid, and we examined hepatocyte apoptosis under physiological conditions. We also examined the effect of both Bid and Bim disruption on the hepatocyte apoptosis caused by the inhibition of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1. Spontaneous hepatocyte apoptosis in Bcl-xL- or Mcl-1-knock-out mice was significantly ameliorated by Bim deletion. The disruption of both Bim and Bid completely prevented hepatocyte apoptosis in Bcl-xL-knock-out mice and weakened massive hepatocyte apoptosis via the additional in vivo knockdown of mcl-1 in these mice. Finally, the hepatocyte apoptosis caused by ABT-737, which is a Bcl-xL/Bcl-2/Bcl-w inhibitor, was completely prevented in Bim/Bid double knock-out mice. The BH3-only proteins Bim and Bid are functionally active but are restrained by the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins under physiological conditions. Hepatocyte integrity is maintained by the dynamic and well orchestrated Bcl-2 network in the healthy liver.     

BH3 domains other than Bim and Bid can directly activate Bax/Bak

Bcl-2 family proteins regulate a critical step in apoptosis referred to as mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). Members of a subgroup of the Bcl-2 family, known as the BH3-only proteins, activate pro-apoptotic effectors (Bax and Bak) to initiate MOMP. They do so by neutralizing pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins and/or directly activating Bax/Bak. Bim and Bid are reported to be direct activators; however, here we show that BH3 peptides other than Bim and Bid exhibited various degrees of direct activation of the effector Bax or Bak, including Bmf and Noxa BH3s. In the absence of potent direct activators, such as Bim and Bid, we unmasked novel direct activator BH3 ligands capable of inducing effector-mediated cytochrome c release and liposome permeabilization, even when both Bcl-xL- and Mcl-1-type anti-apoptotic proteins were inhibited. The ability of these weaker direct activator BH3 peptides to cause MOMP correlated with that of the corresponding full-length proteins to induce apoptosis in the absence of Bim and Bid. We propose that, in certain contexts, direct activation by BH3-only proteins other than Bim and Bid may significantly contribute to MOMP and apoptosis.     

Bcl-2 is a better ABT-737 target than Bcl-xL or Bcl-w and only Noxa overcomes resistance mediated by Mcl-1, Bfl-1, or Bcl-B

The novel anticancer drug ABT-737 is a Bcl-2 Homology 3 (BH3)-mimetic that induces apoptosis by inhibiting pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins. ABT-737 binds with equal affinity to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Bcl-w in vitro and is expected to overrule apoptosis resistance mediated by these Bcl-2 proteins in equal measure. We have profiled ABT-737 specificity for all six pro-survival Bcl-2 proteins, in p53 wild-type or p53-mutant human T-leukemic cells. Bcl-B was untargeted, like Bfl-1 and Mcl-1, in accord with their low affinity for ABT-737 in vitro. However, Bcl-2 proved a better ABT-737 target than Bcl-xL and Bcl-w. This was reflected in differential apoptosis-sensitivity to ABT-737 alone, or combined with etoposide. ABT-737 was not equally effective in displacing BH3-only proteins or Bax from Bcl-2, as compared with Bcl-xL or Bcl-w, offering an explanation for the differential ABT-737 sensitivity of tumor cells overexpressing these proteins. Inducible expression demonstrated that BH3-only proteins Noxa, but not Bim, Puma or truncated Bid could overrule ABT-737 resistance conferred by Bcl-B, Bfl-1 or Mcl-1. These data identify Bcl-B, Bfl-1 and Mcl-1, but also Bcl-xL and Bcl-w as potential mediators of ABT-737 resistance and indicate that target proteins can be differentially sensitive to BH3-mimetics, depending on the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins they are complexed with.     

Genetically defining the mechanism of Puma- and Bim-induced apoptosis

Using genetically modified mouse models, we report here that p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (Puma) and Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death (Bim), two pro-apoptotic members of the B-cell lymphoma protein-2 (Bcl-2) family of proteins, cooperate in causing bone marrow and gastrointestinal tract toxicity in response to chemo and radiation therapy. Deletion of both Puma and Bim provides long-term survival without evidence of increased tumor susceptibility following a lethal challenge of carboplatin and ionizing radiation. Consistent with these in vivo findings, studies of primary mast cells demonstrated that the loss of Puma and Bim confers complete protection from cytokine starvation and DNA damage, similar to that observed for Bax/Bak double knockout cells. Biochemical analyses demonstrated an essential role for either Puma or Bim to activate Bax, thereby leading to mitochondrial outer membrane permeability, cytochrome c release and apoptosis. Treatment of cytokine-deprived cells with ABT-737, a BH3 mimetic, demonstrated that Puma is sufficient to activate Bax even in the absence of all other known direct activators, including Bim, Bid and p53. Collectively, our results identify Puma and Bim as key mediators of DNA damage-induced bone marrow failure and provide mechanistic insight into how BH3-only proteins trigger cell death.     

BimS-induced apoptosis requires mitochondrial localization but not interaction with anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins

Release of apoptogenic proteins such as cytochrome c from mitochondria is regulated by pro- and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, with pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins activating Bax and Bak. Current models assume that apoptosis induction occurs via the binding and inactivation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins by BH3-only proteins or by direct binding to Bax. Here, we analyze apoptosis induction by the BH3-only protein Bim(S). Regulated expression of Bim(S) in epithelial cells was followed by its rapid mitochondrial translocation and mitochondrial membrane insertion in the absence of detectable binding to anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. This caused mitochondrial recruitment and activation of Bax and apoptosis. Mutational analysis of Bim(S) showed that mitochondrial targeting, but not binding to Bcl-2 or Mcl-1, was required for apoptosis induction. In yeast, Bim(S) enhanced the killing activity of Bax in the absence of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Thus, cell death induction by a BH3-only protein can occur through a process that is independent of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins but requires mitochondrial targeting.     

Use of Human Cancer Cell Lines Mitochondria to Explore the Mechanisms of BH3 Peptides and ABT-737-Induced Mitochondrial Membrane Permeabilization

Current limitations of chemotherapy include toxicity on healthy tissues and multidrug resistance of malignant cells. A number of recent anti-cancer strategies aim at targeting the mitochondrial apoptotic machinery to induce tumor cell death. In this study, we set up protocols to purify functional mitochondria from various human cell lines to analyze the effect of peptidic and xenobiotic compounds described to harbour either Bcl-2 inhibition properties or toxic effects related to mitochondria. Mitochondrial inner and outer membrane permeabilization were systematically investigated in cancer cell mitochondria versus non-cancerous mitochondria. The truncated (t-) Bid protein, synthetic BH3 peptides from Bim and Bak, and the small molecule ABT-737 induced a tumor-specific and OMP-restricted mitochondrio-toxicity, while compounds like HA-14.1, YC-137, Chelerythrine, Gossypol, TW-37 or EM20-25 did not. We found that ABT-737 can induce the Bax-dependent release of apoptotic proteins (cytochrome c, Smac/Diablo and Omi/HtrA2 but not AIF) from various but not all cancer cell mitochondria. Furthermore, ABT-737 addition to isolated cancer cell mitochondria induced oligomerization of Bax and/or Bak monomers already inserted in the mitochondrial membrane. Finally immunoprecipatations indicated that ABT-737 induces Bax, Bak and Bim desequestration from Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL but not from Mcl-1L. This study investigates for the first time the mechanism of action of ABT-737 as a single agent on isolated cancer cell mitochondria. Hence, this method based on MOMP (mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization) is an interesting screening tool, tailored for identifying Bcl-2 antagonists with selective toxicity profile against cancer cell mitochondria but devoid of toxicity against healthy mitochondria.     

Direct Interaction of Bax and Bak Proteins with Bcl-2 Homology Domain 3 (BH3)-only Proteins in Living Cells Revealed by Fluorescence Complementation

The key event in the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis is the activation of Bax and Bak by BH3-only proteins through a molecular mechanism that is still a matter of debate. Here we studied interactions among anti- and proapoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family in living cells by using bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis. Our results indicate that the antiapoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and Bcl-x_L bind preferably to the BH3-only proteins Bim, PUMA, and Noxa but can also bind to Bak and Bax. We also found a direct interaction between Bim, PUMA, or Noxa with either Bax or Bak during apoptosis induction. In HeLa cells, interaction of Bim with Bax occurs in cytosol, and then Bim-Bax complexes translocate to mitochondria. Complexes of either PUMA or Noxa with Bax or Bak were always detected at mitochondria. Overexpression of Bcl-x_L or Mcl-1 delayed Bim/Bax translocation to mitochondria. These results reveal the ability of main BH3-only proteins to directly activate Bax and Bak in living cells and suggest that a complex network of interactions regulate the function of Bcl-2 family members during apoptosis.     

Opa1-mediated cristae opening is Bax/Bak and BH3 dependent, required for apoptosis, and independent of Bak oligomerization

Controversy surrounds the role and mechanism of mitochondrial cristae remodeling in apoptosis. Here we show that the proapoptotic BH3-only proteins Bid and Bim induced full cytochrome c release but only a subtle alteration of crista junctions, which involved the disassembly of Opa1 complexes. Both mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and crista junction opening (CJO) were caspase independent and required a functional BH3 domain and Bax/Bak. However, MOMP and CJO were experimentally separable. Pharmacological blockade of MOMP did not prevent Opa1 disassembly and CJO; moreover, expression of a disassembly-resistant mutant Opa1 (Q297V) blocked cytochrome c release and apoptosis but not Bax activation. Thus, apoptosis requires a subtle form of Opa1-dependent crista remodeling that is induced by BH3-only proteins and Bax/Bak but independent of MOMP.     

In non-transformed cells Bak activates upon loss of anti-apoptotic Bcl-XL and Mcl-1 but in the absence of active BH3-only proteins

Mitochondrial apoptosis is controlled by proteins of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family. Pro-apoptotic members of this family, known as BH3-only proteins, initiate activation of the effectors Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) and Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer (Bak), which is counteracted by anti-apoptotic family members. How the interactions of Bcl-2 proteins regulate cell death is still not entirely clear. Here, we show that in the absence of extrinsic apoptotic stimuli Bak activates without detectable contribution from BH3-only proteins, and cell survival depends on anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 molecules. All anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins were targeted via RNA interference alone or in combinations of two in primary human fibroblasts. Simultaneous targeting of B-cell lymphoma-extra large and myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 led to apoptosis in several cell types. Apoptosis depended on Bak whereas Bax was dispensable. Activator BH3-only proteins were not required for apoptosis induction as apoptosis was unaltered in the absence of all BH3-only proteins known to activate Bax or Bak directly, Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death, BH3-interacting domain death agonist and p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis. These findings argue for auto-activation of Bak in the absence of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins and provide evidence of profound differences in the activation of Bax and Bak.The regulated elimination of cells by apoptosis is a key mechanism of development, tissue homeostasis and defense. In vertebrates, apoptosis is regulated through two pathways, the death receptor-mediated (extrinsic) and the mitochondrial (intrinsic) pathway, which is activated by numerous apoptotic stimuli. Mitochondrial apoptosis is characterized by loss of mitochondrial outer membrane integrity and the release of mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins, most notably cytochrome c, which leads to the activation of the caspase-9 and effector caspases.¹Release of cytochrome c is governed by proteins of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family.² The Bcl-2 family consists of three groups, whose expression and interaction decide cell survival. The anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins include Bcl-2, Bcl-X_L (B-cell lymphoma-extra large), Bcl-w (Bcl-2-like protein 2), Mcl-1 (myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1) and A1 (Bcl-2-related protein A1). The pro-apoptotic group of BH3-only proteins (containing a BH3-domain: Bim (Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death), Bid (BH3-interacting domain death agonist), Puma (p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis), Noxa (Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1), Bad (Bcl-2-associated death promoter), Bik (Bcl-2-interacting killer) and Hrk (activator of apoptosis hara-kiri)) activate the pro-apoptotic effectors Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) and Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer (Bak). Bax and Bak can replace each other in most situations, but the presence of one of them is required for mitochondrial apoptosis. Upon activation Bax and Bak form oligomers in the outer mitochondrial membrane and cause the release of cytochrome c. How Bax and Bak are activated is still under debate. Different activation models have been proposed and investigated.According to the direct activation model BH3-only proteins can directly, by physical interaction activate Bax and Bak.³ The model was derived in studies investigating synthetic BH3-domain peptides in in vitro systems, that is, isolated mitochondria or liposomes, where peptides encompassing the BH3-domains of Bim or Bid (‘activator'' BH3-only proteins) were able to activate Bax. Peptides derived from the BH3-only proteins Bad, Bik, Hrk, Noxa or Puma did not activate Bax directly. However, these peptides can bind to anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins with varying preferences.⁴ As this may neutralize a combination of anti-apoptotic proteins it may facilitate Bax/Bak activation by activator BH3-only proteins. Consequently, this group of BH3-only proteins has been named ‘sensitizer'' or ‘derepressor'' BH3-only proteins.^{3, 5, 6, 7} The direct activation model has received recent support by structural studies of activator BH3-domains bound to Bax.⁸ That study also found that the BH3-only peptides used previously lacked a residue that is important in the activation of Bax, and the previous results may have to be reconsidered. Indeed, a recent study illustrates that placing the BH3-domain from the various BH3-only proteins into intact Bid protein enhances Bax/Bak-activating capacity of the BH3-domains of Bid, Bim, Puma, Bmf (Bcl-2-modifying factor), Bik and Hrk.⁹The displacement (or indirect activation) model on the other hand posits that Bax and Bak are held in check by anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins and auto-activate when this interaction is broken by BH3-only proteins (displacement). BH3-only proteins can bind to anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins and upon apoptotic stimulation may cause the displacement of these proteins from Bax and Bak, which may lead to the activation of effectors. BH3-peptides derived from Bim and Puma can bind to all anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins and its corresponding proteins exert killing upon overexpression, whereas Bad, Bmf, Bid, Bik, Hrk and Noxa display binding patterns restricted to certain anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins.⁴ It was therefore suggested that Bax/Bak activation requires the neutralization/displacement of several anti-apoptotic proteins, which may be achieved by one BH3-only protein with broadly binding characteristics (such as Bim) or by the combination of BH3-only proteins with restricted binding capabilities (for instance Bad plus Noxa).^{10, 11}The models have been further refined; the ‘embedded together'' model additionally considers the dynamic interaction of the proteins with the mitochondrial membrane,¹² and it has been proposed that the models can be unified by taking two ‘modes'' of inhibition into account: anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins have a dual function in inactivating both, BH3-only proteins and effectors. Pro-apoptotic signals cause the release of activator BH3-only proteins from sequestration with anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Free BH3-only proteins directly activate effectors, however, cell death may still not be initiated because the effectors are then held in check by anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Free activator BH3-only proteins are required to activate effectors.¹³This model unifies the two above models in the sense that it incorporates aspects of both, inhibition and displacement as well as direct activation. However, the core difference between the (direct) activation and the displacement model appears to be irreconcilable: in the activation model Bax and Bak are inactive unless receiving a stimulus from BH3-only proteins whereas in the displacement model they are active unless bound to anti-apoptotic proteins. Thus, in the absence of all other proteins one model predicts that Bax/Bak are active, the other that they are inactive. Obviously they cannot be both.The direct activation model has initially been established with Bax and the displacement model with Bak. The data are very strong that Bax is activated by direct interaction with BH3-only proteins. Recombinant Bak can also be directly activated by recombinant tBid,¹⁴ and Bid/BH3-chimaeras can activate recombinant Bak missing its C terminus.⁹ However, since Bak is normally inserted into the outer mitochondrial membrane where it may be bound to numerous other Bcl-2-family members, it has been difficult directly to test activation of Bak in the physiological situation.One possibility to ‘unify'' the original models may be in a model where Bax is physiologically activated by direct activation (Bax is inactive until receiving a signal through BH3-only proteins) whereas Bak is activated indirectly (auto-activates when the inhibition by Bcl-2-like proteins is relieved). Here we test this possibility of indirect Bak activation. We targeted anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins using RNAi. In this setting, protein concentrations and conditions are physiological, which avoids some of the problems associated with overexpression or cell-free experiments. Non-malignant cells may respond differently to the loss of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins compared with tumor cells.¹⁵ In this study, using non-malignant cells, we targeted all anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 molecules in combinations of two. In the absence of apoptotic stimuli we observed that the combined loss of Bcl-X_L and Mcl-1 was sufficient to induce apoptosis. The direct activator proteins Bid, Bim and Puma were not needed. These observations provide evidence for indirect activation of Bak.     

The established and the predicted roles of dynein light chain in the regulation of mitochondrial apoptosis

The mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis is regulated by the interplay between the members of Bcl-2 family. Within this family, BH3-only proteins are the sensors of apoptotic stimuli and can trigger apoptosis either by inhibiting the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2-family proteins or by directly activating the effectors Bax and Bak. An expanding body of research suggests that a number of non-Bcl-2 proteins can also interact with Bcl-2 proteins and contribute to the decision of cell fate. Dynein light chain (LC8, DYNLL or DLC), a hub protein and a dimerizing engine has been proposed to regulate the pro-apoptotic activity of two BH3-only proteins, Bim and Bmf. Our recent work has provided insight into the mechanisms through which DLC1 (DYNLL1) modulates Bim activity. Here we discuss the present day understanding of Bim-DLC interaction and endeavor to evaluate this interaction in the light of information from studies of DLC with other binding partners.     

Selective involvement of BH3-only proteins and differential targets of Noxa in diverse apoptotic pathways

The BH3-only proteins of the Bcl-2 family are known to mediate mitochondrial dysfunction during apoptosis. However, the identity of the critical BH3-only proteins and the mechanism of their action following treatment by diverse apoptotic stimuli remain to be fully resolved. We therefore used RNAi to screen the entire Bcl-2 family for their involvement in three major apoptotic pathways in HeLa cells. We found that Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 are major inhibitors of apoptosis induced by TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and proteasome inhibition. Among the 10 BH3-only proteins, Bid and Noxa were found to be critically involved in TRAIL-induced apoptosis, in which Noxa participates by constitutively binding to Mcl-1. Bim and Noxa were found to be necessary for ER stress-induced apoptosis, in which Noxa assisted Bim function by sequestering Mcl-1 and binding to Bcl-xL. As a critical BH3-only protein, Noxa was strongly upregulated and became associated with both Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL during apoptosis induced by proteasome inhibition. In addition, we found that Noxa became 'Mcl-1 free' following treatment by ER stress and proteasome inhibition, but not after TRAIL treatment. These results defined the critical Bcl-2 network during apoptosis and suggested that Noxa participated in triggering mitochondrial dysfunction in multiple apoptotic pathways through distinct mechanisms.     

BH3-only proteins trigger cytochrome c release, but how?

The mitochondrial apoptosis pathway has been neatly ordered. Mitochondrial apoptosis is governed by Bcl-2 family proteins, and their respective contributions determine the release of cytochrome c. It is clear that, among the Bcl-2 family, BH3-only proteins are the triggers: activation of BH3-only proteins by apoptotic stimuli initiates the process. BH3-only proteins cause cytochrome c release by activating Bax and/or Bak, and the anti-apoptotic group of Bcl-2-like proteins prevents this. However, it is curiously uncertain how BH3-only proteins activate Bax/Bak. Current models suggest that this is either through direct interaction--although this interaction is not detectable experimentally--or by the neutralisation of Bcl-2-like proteins. Here we discuss the context in which these models are placed and attempt to weigh the evidence.     

The BH3 alpha-helical mimic BH3-M6 disrupts Bcl-X(L), Bcl-2, and MCL-1 protein-protein interactions with Bax, Bak, Bad, or Bim and induces apoptosis in a Bax- and Bim-dependent manner

A critical hallmark of cancer cell survival is evasion of apoptosis. This is commonly due to overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2, Bcl-X(L), and Mcl-1, which bind to the BH3 α-helical domain of pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bax, Bak, Bad, and Bim, and inhibit their function. We designed a BH3 α-helical mimetic BH3-M6 that binds to Bcl-X(L) and Mcl-1 and prevents their binding to fluorescently labeled Bak- or Bim-BH3 peptides in vitro. Using several approaches, we demonstrate that BH3-M6 is a pan-Bcl-2 antagonist that inhibits the binding of Bcl-X(L), Bcl-2, and Mcl-1 to multi-domain Bax or Bak, or BH3-only Bim or Bad in cell-free systems and in intact human cancer cells, freeing up pro-apoptotic proteins to induce apoptosis. BH3-M6 disruption of these protein-protein interactions is associated with cytochrome c release from mitochondria, caspase-3 activation and PARP cleavage. Using caspase inhibitors and Bax and Bak siRNAs, we demonstrate that BH3-M6-induced apoptosis is caspase- and Bax-, but not Bak-dependent. Furthermore, BH3-M6 disrupts Bcl-X(L)/Bim, Bcl-2/Bim, and Mcl-1/Bim protein-protein interactions and frees up Bim to induce apoptosis in human cancer cells that depend for tumor survival on the neutralization of Bim with Bcl-X(L), Bcl-2, or Mcl-1. Finally, BH3-M6 sensitizes cells to apoptosis induced by the proteasome inhibitor CEP-1612.     

Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL regulate Bak/Bax-dependent apoptosis of the megakaryocytic lineage at multistages

Anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, which inhibit the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis, are involved in the survival of various hematopoietic lineages and are often dysregulated in hematopoietic malignancies. However, their involvement in the megakaryocytic lineage is not well understood. In the present paper, we describe the crucial anti-apoptotic role of Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL in this lineage at multistages. The megakaryocytic lineage-specific deletion of both, in sharp contrast to only one of them, caused apoptotic loss of mature megakaryocytes in the fetal liver and systemic hemorrhage, leading to embryonic lethality. ABT-737, a Bcl-xL/Bcl-2/Bcl-w inhibitor, only caused thrombocytopenia in adult wild-type mice, but further induced massive mature megakaryocyte apoptosis in the Mcl-1 knockout mice, leading to severe hemorrhagic anemia. All these phenotypes were fully restored if Bak and Bax, downstream apoptosis executioners, were also deficient. In-vitro study revealed that the Jak pathway maintained Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL expression levels, preventing megakaryoblastic cell apoptosis. Similarly, both were involved in reticulated platelet survival, whereas platelet survival was dependent on Bcl-xL due to rapid proteasomal degradation of Mcl-1. In conclusion, Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL regulate the survival of the megakaryocytic lineage, which is critically important for preventing lethal or severe hemorrhage in both developing and adult mice.     

BH3 domains of BH3-only proteins differentially regulate Bax-mediated mitochondrial membrane permeabilization both directly and indirectly

Using a Bax-dependent membrane-permeabilization assay, we show that peptides corresponding to the BH3 domains of Bcl-2 family "BH3-only" proteins have dual functions. Several BH3 peptides relieved the inhibition of Bax caused by the antiapoptotic Bcl-x(L) and/or Mcl-1 proteins, some displaying a specificity for either Bcl-x(L) or Mcl-1. Besides having this derepression function, the Bid and Bim peptides activated Bax directly and were the only BH3 peptides tested that could potently induce cytochrome c release from mitochondria in cultured cells. Furthermore, Bax activator molecules (cleaved Bid protein and the Bim BH3 peptide) synergistically induced cytochrome c release when introduced into cells along with derepressor BH3 peptides. These observations support a unified model of BH3 domain function, encompassing both positive and negative regulation of other Bcl-2 family members. In this model, the simple inhibition of antiapoptotic functions is insufficient to induce apoptosis unless a direct activator of Bax or Bak is present.     

Bax activation and mitochondrial insertion during apoptosis

The mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is a highly regulated biological mechanism which determines cell fate. It is defined as a cascade of events, going from an apoptotic stimulus to the MOM permeabilization, resulting in the activation of the so-called executive phase. This pathway is very often altered in cancer cells.The mitochondrial permeabilization is under the control of the Bcl-2 family of proteins (pBcls). These proteins share one to four homology domains (designed BH1-4) with Bcl-2, and are susceptible of homo- and/or hetero-dimerization. In spite of a poor amino-acid sequence homology, these proteins exhibit very similar tertiary structures. Strikingly, while some of these proteins are anti-apoptotic, the others are pro-apoptotic. Pro-apoptotic proteins are further divided in two sub-classes: multi-domains proteins, among which Bax and Bak, which exhibit BH1-3 domains, and BH3-only proteins (or BOPs). Schematically, BOPs and anti-apoptotic proteins antagonistically regulate the activation of the multi-domain proteins Bax and Bak and their oligomerization in the MOM, the latter process being responsible for the apoptotic mitochondrial permeabilization.Considering the critical role of Bax in cancer cells apoptosis, we focus in this review on the molecular events of Bax activation through its interaction with the other proteins from the Bcl-2 family. The mechanism by which Bax triggers the MOM permeabilization once activated will be discussed in some other reviews in this special issue.     

BH3-only proteins are tail-anchored in the outer mitochondrial membrane and can initiate the activation of Bax

During mitochondrial apoptosis, pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins cause the translocation of cytosolic Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) where it is activated to release cytochrome c from the mitochondrial intermembrane space, but the mechanism is under dispute. We show that most BH3-only proteins are mitochondrial proteins that are imported into the OMM via a C-terminal tail-anchor domain in isolated yeast mitochondria, independently of binding to anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. This C-terminal domain acted as a classical mitochondrial targeting signal and was sufficient to direct green fluorescent protein to mitochondria in human cells. When expressed in mouse fibroblasts, these BH3-only proteins localised to mitochondria and were inserted in the OMM. The BH3-only proteins Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death (Bim), tBid and p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis sensitised isolated mitochondria from Bax/Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer-deficient fibroblasts to cytochrome c-release by recombinant, extramitochondrial Bax. For Bim, this activity is shown to require the C-terminal-targeting signal and to be independent of binding capacity to and presence of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Bim further enhanced Bax-dependent killing in yeast. A model is proposed where OMM-tail-anchored BH3-only proteins permit passive 'recruitment' and catalysis-like activation of extra-mitochondrial Bax. The recognition of C-terminal membrane-insertion of BH3-only proteins will permit the development of a more detailed concept of the initiation of mitochondrial apoptosis.     

Puma strikes Bax

The commitment to programmed cell death via apoptosis is largely made upon activation of the proapoptotic mitochondrial proteins Bax or Bak. In this issue, Gallenne et al. (Gallenne, C., F. Gautier, L. Oliver, E. Hervouet, B. Noël, J.A. Hickman, O. Geneste, P.-F. Cartron, F.M. Vallette, S. Manon, and P. Juin. 2009. J. Cell Biol. 185:279–290) provide evidence that the p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (Puma) protein can directly activate Bax.The Bcl-2 family of proteins participates in the control of the cell''s commitment to programmed cell death via the mitochondrial or intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Certain proteins in this family, including Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Bcl-w, Mcl-1, and Bfl-1/A1, inhibit apoptosis, whereas others in this family promote apoptosis. Proapoptotic Bax and Bak appear to be indispensible for apoptosis (Lindsten et al., 2000; Wei et al., 2001). How does the cell determine fate in the face of competing pro- and antiapoptotic proteins? The rheostat model proposed that when there were more antiapoptotic proteins than proapoptotic proteins, the cell survived and vice versa. However, in many cases, the conversion of a living cell to one committed to death occurs without significant change in the levels of pro- and antiapoptotic proteins. The participation of a third class of proapoptotic proteins largely explained this riddle. These proteins, so-called BH3-only as they share homology only in the proapoptotic Bcl-2 homology 3 domain, appear to act as sentinels of cell damage, which convert initial perturbations into death signals, that act in the mitochondrial pathway. Now, Gallenne et al. (see p. 279 of this issue) provide mechanistic insight into how the BH3-only protein Puma promotes apoptosis. The authors find that Puma, like the BH3-only proteins Bim and Bid, directly activates Bax.A key event in the commitment to apoptosis is Bax- and Bak-mediated permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane. For this to occur, Bax and Bak alter their conformation from an inactive to an active form, form homo-oligomers in the membrane, and contribute to the formation of pores, which allows the egress of proapoptotic proteins to the cytosol (Fig. 1). Although there is consensus that Bax and Bak must shift from an inactive to an active state for this to occur, there is less consensus about what specific factors cause this crucial switch (Willis et al., 2007). Bid and Bim have been shown to cause activation (conformational change and oligomerization) of Bax and Bak in cellular, mitochondrial, and liposomal systems (Wei et al., 2000; Kuwana et al., 2002; Cartron et al., 2004; Certo et al., 2006). Direct interaction between these activators and Bax has been established experimentally (Gavathiotis et al., 2008; Lovell et al., 2008). Additional studies have suggested that p53 itself may translocate to the mitochondria and activate Bax after select stimuli (Mihara et al. 2003; Chipuk et al., 2004). Even heat has been indicted as a potential activating factor (Pagliari et al., 2005). It is quite possible that many activating factors remain to be discovered.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Control of mitochondrial permeabilization by Bcl-2 family proteins. Activated Bax or Bak are available to oligomerize either when they are directly activated by activating factors, including activator BH3-only proteins (top), or when preactivated Bax or Bak are displaced from antiapoptotic proteins by either activator or sensitizer BH3-only proteins (bottom). Gallenne et al. (2009) provide evidence that Puma is an activator rather than a sensitizer. Oligomerized Bax or Bak participate in forming a pore that allows egress of proapoptotic factors like cytochrome c. Cytochrome c promotes formation of the apoptosome complex, which causes activation of effector caspases. These proteases cleave many key cellular proteins to bring about the apoptotic phenotype. Figure adapted with permission from the Journal of Cell Science (Brunelle, J.K., and A. Letai. 2009. J. Cell Sci. 122:437–441).Antiapoptotic proteins inhibit apoptosis by binding proapoptotic factors. In many cases, the proapoptotic factors are activator BH3-only proteins like Bid and Bim. However, in some cases, the proapoptotic factors may also include activated monomeric Bax and Bak, which are intercepted before they can oligomerize and form pores. Cells have been described in which antiapoptotic proteins are loaded with abundant prodeath proteins as being “primed for death.” Such cells are particularly sensitive to treatment with chemotherapy and antagonists of antiapoptotic proteins like ABT-737 (Certo et al., 2006; Deng et al., 2007). In most cells, the vast majority of Bax and Bak are in the inactive form, and activated Bax and Bak can be difficult to detect in the absence of toxic perturbation. Nonetheless, BH3-only molecules, which lack the ability to directly activate Bax or Bak, can cause apoptosis by competing for binding to antiapoptotic proteins (Fig. 1). If this competition frees sufficient activator proteins (or activated Bax and Bak), oligomerization of Bax and Bak ensues, committing the cell to death. Based on performance in assays on mitochondria and artificial liposomes spiked with Bax, the BH3-only family has thus been segregated into two subfamilies: the sensitizers and the activators.Where does Puma fit in? Puma was initially identified as a p53-regulated gene that was induced after DNA damage (Nakano and Vousden, 2001). It has subsequently been found that Puma is responsible for much of the proapoptotic effect of p53 induction but that Puma can also cause apoptosis in a p53-independent fashion (Jeffers et al., 2003; Villunger et al., 2003). The assignment of Puma as either a sensitizer or an activator has been somewhat contentious. The BH3 domains of BH3-only proteins are both necessary and sufficient to interact with Bcl-2 family members and seem to largely recapitulate function of the entire protein. For instance, the BH3 domains of Bid and Bim can activate Bax and Bak in liposomal or mitochondrial settings. The Puma BH3 domain lacked this function in several studies, leading many to classify Puma as a sensitizer (Kuwana et al., 2005; Certo et al., 2006). However, experiments with the full-length protein translated in vitro show an ability to activate Bax comparable with that of Bim and Bid (Kim et al., 2006).Cartron et al. (2004) has previously found that the BH3 domains of Bim and Puma but not the sensitizer Bad interact with Bax and cause its activation. In Gallenne et al. (2009), the role of Puma as an activator is further supported by three main pieces of evidence. First, Bax preincubated with the Puma BH3 peptide is more toxic to microinjected cells than is Bax alone. This enhancement is blocked by coincubation with a peptide mimicking the putative interaction site on Bax, the Hα1 C-terminal peptide. This suggests that the interaction of the Puma BH3 domain with a site on the first α helix of Bax is necessary for Puma''s enhancement of Bax killing. It is worth noting that this interaction site on Bax, first identified by this group 4 yr ago, overlaps with an interaction site of the activator Bim BH3 peptide with Bax recently demonstrated by nuclear magnetic resonance in solution (Gavathiotis et al., 2008). The fact that two groups independently identified a similar and unexpected site for interaction of activating BH3 domains with Bax lends some confidence to this finding.Additionally, because the Bcl-2 family is absent from the yeast genome, the authors exploit yeast to study Puma and Bax in a setting uncontaminated by the contribution of unmeasured Bcl-2 family proteins. Again, they find that coexpression of Puma is necessary for efficient killing by Bax. Finally, the authors investigate the participation of Puma in killing human colorectal cancer cells with ABT-737. ABT-737 is a BH3 mimetic that promotes apoptosis by binding antiapoptotic proteins and displacing select prebound prodeath proteins. Thus, ABT-737 can only kill cells that are primed with either activators or preactivated Bax or Bak. They find that ABT-737 treatment results in the freeing of Puma, which then interacts with Bax, correlating with the death of the cell. This finding suggests that Puma can play the priming function that is likely critical to sensitivity to many chemotherapeutic agents as well as ABT-737 (Deng et al., 2007). This role may be particularly important in cells in which Bim and Bid are not expressed at high levels.Some questions remain. It is not clear why several laboratories have consistently failed to observe an activating function for the BH3 domain of Puma in either mitochondrial or liposomal systems. It is possible that even if Puma can play an activating role, the efficiency of this function may vary considerably according to context and perhaps be much less in many contexts than that of Bid or Bim. In a full-length Puma protein, perhaps interactions of the Puma BH3 domain with Bax are enhanced. It is also possible that unknown posttranslational modifications of Puma or Bax, varying according to cellular context, significantly influence the ability of Puma to activate Bax. In any case, Gallenne et al. (2009) have strengthened the case for Puma as an activator so that its potential contribution to this function cannot be ignored. One must now wonder: what other activators might still be out there waiting to be discovered?     

Natural diterpenoid compound elevates expression of Bim protein, which interacts with antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2, converting it to proapoptotic Bax-like molecule

Overwhelming evidence indicates that Bax and Bak are indispensable for mediating cytochrome c release from mitochondria during apoptosis. Here we report a Bax/Bak-independent mechanism of cytochrome c release and apoptosis. We identified a natural diterpenoid compound that induced apoptosis in bax/bak double knock-out murine embryonic fibroblasts and substantially reduced the tumor growth from these cells implanted in mice. Treatment with the compound significantly increased expression of Bim, which migrated to mitochondria, altering the conformation of and forming oligomers with resident Bcl-2 to induce cytochrome c release and caspase activation. Importantly, purified Bim and Bcl-2 proteins cooperated to permeabilize a model mitochondrial outer membrane; this was accompanied by oligomerization of these proteins and deep embedding of Bcl-2 in the membrane. Therefore, the diterpenoid compound induces a structural and functional conversion of Bcl-2 through Bim to permeabilize the mitochondrial outer membrane, thereby inducing apoptosis independently of Bax and Bak. Because Bcl-2 family proteins play important roles in cancer development and relapse, this novel cell death mechanism can be explored for developing more effective anticancer therapeutics.