DEVELOPMENTALLY REGULATED PLASMA MEMBRANE PROTEIN of Nicotiana benthamiana Contributes to Potyvirus Movement and Transports to Plasmodesmata via the Early Secretory Pathway and the Actomyosin System

The intercellular movement of plant viruses requires both viral and host proteins. Previous studies have demonstrated that the frame-shift protein P3N-PIPO (for the protein encoded by the open reading frame [ORF] containing 5′-terminus of P3 and a +2 frame-shift ORF called Pretty Interesting Potyviridae ORF and embedded in the P3) and CYLINDRICAL INCLUSION (CI) proteins were required for potyvirus cell-to-cell movement. Here, we provide genetic evidence showing that a Tobacco vein banding mosaic virus (TVBMV; genus Potyvirus) mutant carrying a truncated PIPO domain of 58 amino acid residues could move between cells and induce systemic infection in Nicotiana benthamiana plants; mutants carrying a PIPO domain of seven, 20, or 43 amino acid residues failed to move between cells and cause systemic infection in this host plant. Interestingly, the movement-defective mutants produced progeny that eliminated the previously introduced stop codons and thus restored their systemic movement ability. We also present evidence showing that a developmentally regulated plasma membrane protein of N. benthamiana (referred to as NbDREPP) interacted with both P3N-PIPO and CI of the movement-competent TVBMV. The knockdown of NbDREPP gene expression in N. benthamiana impeded the cell-to-cell movement of TVBMV. NbDREPP was shown to colocalize with TVBMV P3N-PIPO and CI at plasmodesmata (PD) and traffic to PD via the early secretory pathway and the actomyosin motility system. We also show that myosin XI-2 is specially required for transporting NbDREPP to PD. In conclusion, NbDREPP is a key host protein within the early secretory pathway and the actomyosin motility system that interacts with two movement proteins and influences virus movement.The movement of viruses in plants can be divided into three stages: intracellular, intercellular, and long-distance movement (Nelson and Citovsky, 2005; Benitez-Alfonso et al., 2010). Plasmodesmata (PD) are plasma membrane-mediated channels in cell walls that control the intercellular trafficking of micromolecules and macromolecules, including plant viruses (Boevink and Oparka, 2005; Lucas et al., 2009). Plant viruses encode movement proteins (MPs) that can regulate the size exclusion limit (SEL) of PD and mediate virus trafficking between cells (Lucas, 2006; Raffaele et al., 2009; Amari et al., 2010; Ueki et al., 2010). Based on the functions of MPs during virus movement, the viral MPs are divided into three major groups. The first group of MPs is represented by the 30-kD protein of Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). The 30-kD proteins can interact with single-stranded RNAs and transport viral ribonucleoprotein complexes to cell walls, where they modify the SEL of PD to allow viruses to traverse the cell walls (Olesinski et al., 1996; Tzfira et al., 2000; Kawakami et al., 2004). The second group of MPs is known to form tubular structures that extend across the PD and allow virus to traverse. Viruses that encode this group of MPs include Cowpea mosaic virus, Grapevine fan leaf virus (GFLV), Cauliflower mosaic virus, and Tomato spotted wilt virus (Ritzenthaler and Hofmann, 2007; Amari et al., 2011). The third group of MPs is known as triple gene block proteins (TGBps), encoded by overlapping triple gene blocks. The three TGBps (TGBp1, TGBp2, and TGBp3) function coordinately to transport viral genomes to and through PD (Verchot-Lubicz, 2005; Jackson et al., 2009; Lim et al., 2009; Tilsner et al., 2013). Viruses that encode TGBps belong to the genera Potexvirus, Hordeivirus, and Pomovirus (Verchot-Lubicz et al., 2010). Potyviruses are different from the above viruses and lack a dedicated MP. To date, multiple potyviral proteins, including COAT PROTEIN, CYLINDRICAL INCLUSION (CI), HELPER COMPONENT PROTEINASE (HC-Pro), and VIRAL GENOME-LINKED PROTEIN, have been shown to function in the cell-to-cell movement of potyviruses (Nicolas et al., 1997; Rojas et al., 1997; Carrington et al., 1998; Wei et al., 2010).Viruses of Potyvirus (family Potyviridae), the largest genus of plant-infecting viruses, cause great economic losses to world agriculture production (Fauquet et al., 2005). The potyviral genome is a positive sense, single-stranded RNA of approximately 10 kb in length. It contains a large open reading frame (ORF) encoding a polyprotein that is later processed into 10 mature proteins by three virus-encoded proteinases (Riechmann et al., 1992; Fauquet et al., 2005). A +2 frame-shift Pretty Interesting Potyviridae (PIPO) ORF that is embedded within the P3 ORF was recently identified and proposed to produce a P3N-PIPO (for the protein encoded by 5′-terminus of P3 and frame-shift PIPO) fusion (Chung et al., 2008; Vijayapalani et al., 2012). The P3N-PIPOs of Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) and Tobacco etch virus were previously shown to localize at PD, interact with CI in planta, and transport CI to PD in a CI:P3N-PIPO ratio-dependent manner (Wei et al., 2010). Soybean mosaic virus with a mutant PIPO domain failed to cause systemic infection in its host plant (Wen and Hajimorad, 2010). Therefore, the potyvirus P3N-PIPO has been suggested as the classical MP (Tilsner and Oparka, 2012; Vijayapalani et al., 2012).Viruses recruit host factors for their movement in plants (Chen et al., 2000; Raffaele et al., 2009; Amari et al., 2010; Ueki et al., 2010). Compared with the progresses on viral MP characterization, identifications of MP-interacting host proteins are much behind (Chen et al., 2000; Oparka, 2004; Raffaele et al., 2009; Amari et al., 2010). To date, about 20 host proteins have been identified to interact with specific viral MPs (Pallas and García, 2011). For example, the pectin methylesterase interacted with TMV MP, increased the SEL of PD, and facilitated TMV movement between cells (Chen et al., 2000); an ankyrin repeat-containing protein (ANK) interacted with TMV MP at PD, down-regulated callose formation, and aided viral movement (Ueki et al., 2010); the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PLASMODESMATA-LOCALIZED PROTEIN1 (AtPDLP1) was reported to interact with GFLV MP and mediate tubule assembly during GFLV cell-to-cell movement in plants (Amari et al., 2010, 2011). TuMV P3N-PIPO was shown to interact with AtPCaP1, a plasma membrane cation-binding protein of Arabidopsis, and colocalize with this host protein at the PD. Knockout of AtPCaP1 expression resulted in a significant reduction of TuMV infection in Arabidopsis (Vijayapalani et al., 2012).Many viral MPs have been shown to traffic within plant cells via the early secretory pathway and/or along the actin filaments or microtubules. For example, the early secretory pathway and microtubules were required for GFLV MP trafficking to PD (Laporte et al., 2003). TuMV P3N-PIPO and CI were reported to utilize the early secretory pathway rather than the actomyosin motility system for their trafficking to PD (Wei et al., 2010). Several plant myosin motor proteins have been reported to participate in virus intracellular movement (Wei and Wang, 2008; Harries et al., 2010). Myosins VIII-1, VIII-2, and VIII-B were shown to transport a HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN70 homolog of Beet yellows virus to PD (Avisar et al., 2008a), but only myosin VIII-1 was needed for the nonstructural protein encoded by viral complementary strand of RNA4 (NSvc4) of Rice stripe virus traffic to PD (Yuan et al., 2011). A more recent study has indicated that both the secretory pathway and myosins XI-2 and XI-K were required for TuMV cell-to-cell movement (Agbeci et al., 2013). However, it remains largely unknown how the MP-interacting host factor(s) reach their target sites in cells.Tobacco vein banding mosaic virus (TVBMV) is a distinct potyvirus mainly infecting solanaceous crops (Tian et al., 2007; Yu et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011). In this article, we provide evidence showing the length requirements of the PIPO domains for its function in mediating TVBMV movement and the restoration of the movement-defective TVBMV mutants. We also show the interactions between TVBMV P3N-PIPO and CI and NbDREPP, a developmentally regulated plasma membrane protein in Nicotiana benthamiana, and the route by which NbDREPP traffics to PD. Silencing of NbDREPP expression in N. benthamiana significantly impeded the cell-to-cell movement of TVBMV.     

The Role of a Potassium Transporter OsHAK5 in Potassium Acquisition and Transport from Roots to Shoots in Rice at Low Potassium Supply Levels

In plants, K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) is the largest potassium (K) transporter family; however, few of the members have had their physiological functions characterized in planta. Here, we studied OsHAK5 of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice (Oryza sativa). We determined its cellular and tissue localization and analyzed its functions in rice using both OsHAK5 knockout mutants and overexpression lines in three genetic backgrounds. A β-glucuronidase reporter driven by the OsHAK5 native promoter indicated OsHAK5 expression in various tissue organs from root to seed, abundantly in root epidermis and stele, the vascular tissues, and mesophyll cells. Net K influx rate in roots and K transport from roots to aerial parts were severely impaired by OsHAK5 knockout but increased by OsHAK5 overexpression in 0.1 and 0.3 mm K external solution. The contribution of OsHAK5 to K mobilization within the rice plant was confirmed further by the change of K concentration in the xylem sap and K distribution in the transgenic lines when K was removed completely from the external solution. Overexpression of OsHAK5 increased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots and salt stress tolerance (shoot growth), while knockout of OsHAK5 decreased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots, resulting in sensitivity to salt stress. Taken together, these results demonstrate that OsHAK5 plays a major role in K acquisition by roots faced with low external K and in K upward transport from roots to shoots in K-deficient rice plants.Potassium (K) is one of the three most important macronutrients and the most abundant cation in plants. As a major osmoticum in the vacuole, K drives the generation of turgor pressure, enabling cell expansion. In the vascular tissue, K is an important participant in the generation of root pressure (for review, see Wegner, 2014 [including his new hypothesis]). In the phloem, K is critical for the transport of photoassimilates from source to sink (Marschner, 1996; Deeken et al., 2002; Gajdanowicz et al., 2011). In addition, enhancing K absorption and decreasing sodium (Na) accumulation is a major strategy of glycophytes in salt stress tolerance (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999; Munns and Tester, 2008; Shabala and Cuin, 2008).Plants acquire K through K-permeable proteins at the root surface. Since available K concentration in the soil may vary by 100-fold, plants have developed multiple K uptake systems for adapting to this variability (Epstein et al., 1963; Grabov, 2007; Maathuis, 2009). In a classic K uptake experiment in barley (Hordeum vulgare), root K absorption has been described as a high-affinity and low-affinity biphasic transport process (Epstein et al., 1963). It is generally assumed that the low-affinity transport system (LATS) in the roots mediates K uptake in the millimolar range and that the activity of this system is insensitive to external K concentration (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997; Chérel et al., 2014). In contrast, the high-affinity transport system (HATS) was rapidly up-regulated when the supply of exogenous K was halted (Glass, 1976; Glass and Dunlop, 1978).The membrane transporters for K flux identified in plants are generally classified into three channels and three transporter families based on phylogenetic analysis (Mäser et al., 2001; Véry and Sentenac, 2003; Lebaudy et al., 2007; Alemán et al., 2011). For K uptake, it was predicted that, under most circumstances, K transporters function as HATS, while K-permeable channels mediate LATS (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997). However, a root-expressed K channel in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), Arabidopsis K Transporter1 (AKT1), mediates K absorption over a wide range of external K concentrations (Sentenac et al., 1992; Lagarde et al., 1996; Hirsch et al., 1998; Spalding et al., 1999), while evidence is accumulating that many K transporters, including members of the K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) family, are low-affinity K transporters (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Senn et al., 2001), implying that functions of plant K channels and transporters overlap at different K concentration ranges.Out of the three families of K transporters, cation proton antiporter (CPA), high affinity K/Na transporter (HKT), and KT/HAK/KUP, CPA was characterized as a K⁺(Na⁺)/H⁺ antiporter, HKT may cotransport Na and K or transport Na only (Rubio et al., 1995; Uozumi et al., 2000), while KT/HAK/KUP were predicted to be H⁺-coupled K⁺ symporters (Mäser et al., 2001; Lebaudy et al., 2007). KT/HAK/KUP were named by different researchers who first identified and cloned them (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Santa-María et al., 1997). In plants, the KT/HAK/KUP family is the largest K transporter family, including 13 members in Arabidopsis and 27 members in the rice (Oryza sativa) genome (Rubio et al., 2000; Mäser et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2008). Sequence alignments show that genes of this family share relatively low homology to each other. The KT/HAK/KUP family was divided into four major clusters (Rubio et al., 2000; Gupta et al., 2008), and in cluster I and II, they were further separated into A and B groups. Genes of cluster I or II likely exist in all plants, cluster III is composed of genes from both Arabidopsis and rice, while cluster IV includes only four rice genes (Grabov, 2007; Gupta et al., 2008).The functions of KT/HAK/KUP were studied mostly in heterologous expression systems. Transporters of cluster I, such as AtHAK5, HvHAK1, OsHAK1, and OsHAK5, are localized in the plasma membrane (Kim et al., 1998; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gierth et al., 2005) and exhibit high-affinity K uptake in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Santa-María et al., 1997; Fu and Luan, 1998; Rubio et al., 2000) and in Escherichia coli (Horie et al., 2011). Transporters of cluster II, like AtKUP4 (TINY ROOT HAIRS1, TRH1), HvHAK2, OsHAK2, OsHAK7, and OsHAK10, could not complement the K uptake-deficient yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but were able to mediate K fluxes in a bacterial mutant; they might be tonoplast transporters (Senn et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Navarro and Rubio, 2006). The function of transporters in clusters III and IV is even less known (Grabov, 2007).Existing data suggest that some KT/HAK/KUP transporters also may respond to salinity stress (Maathuis, 2009). The cluster I transporters of HvHAK1 mediate Na influx (Santa-María et al., 1997), while AtHAK5 expression is inhibited by Na (Rubio et al., 2000; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010). Expression of OsHAK5 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY2 cells enhanced the salt tolerance of these cells by accumulating more K without affecting their Na content (Horie et al., 2011).There are only scarce reports on the physiological function of KT/HAK/KUP in planta. In Arabidopsis, mutation of AtKUP2 (SHORT HYPOCOTYL3) resulted in a short hypocotyl, small leaves, and a short flowering stem (Elumalai et al., 2002), while a loss-of-function mutation of AtKUP4 (TRH1) resulted in short root hairs and a loss of gravity response in the root (Rigas et al., 2001; Desbrosses et al., 2003; Ahn et al., 2004). AtHAK5 is the only system currently known to mediate K uptake at concentrations below 0.01 mm (Rubio et al., 2010) and provides a cesium uptake pathway (Qi et al., 2008). AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 are the two major physiologically relevant molecular entities mediating K uptake into roots in the range between 0.01 and 0.05 mm (Pyo et al., 2010; Rubio et al., 2010). AtAKT1 may contribute to K uptake within the K concentrations that belong to the high-affinity system described by Epstein et al. (1963).Among all 27 members of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice, OsHAK1, OsHAK5, OsHAK19, and OsHAK20 were grouped in cluster IB (Gupta et al., 2008). These four rice HAK members share 50.9% to 53.4% amino acid identity with AtHAK5. OsHAK1 was expressed in the whole plant, with maximum expression in roots, and was up-regulated by K deficiency; it mediated high-affinity K uptake in yeast (Bañuelos et al., 2002). In this study, we examined the tissue-specific localization and the physiological functions of OsHAK5 in response to variation in K supply and to salt stress in rice. By comparing K uptake and translocation in OsHAK5 knockout (KO) mutants and in OsHAK5-overexpressing lines with those in their respective wild-type lines supplied with different K concentrations, we found that OsHAK5 not only mediates high-affinity K acquisition but also participates in root-to-shoot K transport as well as in K-regulated salt tolerance.     

Acclimation of Leaf Nitrogen to Vertical Light Gradient at Anthesis in Wheat Is a Whole-Plant Process That Scales with the Size of the Canopy

Vertical leaf nitrogen (N) gradient within a canopy is classically considered as a key adaptation to the local light environment that would tend to maximize canopy photosynthesis. We studied the vertical leaf N gradient with respect to the light gradient for wheat (Triticum aestivum) canopies with the aims of quantifying its modulation by crop N status and genetic variability and analyzing its ecophysiological determinants. The vertical distribution of leaf N and light was analyzed at anthesis for 16 cultivars grown in the field in two consecutive seasons under two levels of N. The N extinction coefficient with respect to light (b) varied with N supply and cultivar. Interestingly, a scaling relationship was observed between b and the size of the canopy for all the cultivars in the different environmental conditions. The scaling coefficient of the b-green area index relationship differed among cultivars, suggesting that cultivars could be more or less adapted to low-productivity environments. We conclude that the acclimation of the leaf N gradient to the light gradient is a whole-plant process that depends on canopy size. This study demonstrates that modeling leaf N distribution and canopy expansion based on the assumption that leaf N distribution parallels that of the light is inappropriate. We provide a robust relationship accounting for vertical leaf N gradient with respect to vertical light gradient as a function of canopy size.In cereals, as in many crop species, nitrogen (N) nutrition is a major determinant in the elaboration of grain yield and quality (Lemaire and Millard, 1999; Lawlor, 2002; Hikosaka, 2005). N is involved in both meristematic and photosynthetic activities, with consequences on plant architecture and carbon acquisition and in fine on grain yield and protein concentration. Beside the total amount of N absorbed by the crop, the allocation of N among plant organs plays a key role in determining crop productivity and quality (Grindlay, 1997; Dreccer et al., 1998; Hikosaka, 2005).Light interception and leaf N content are the two main factors governing carbon assimilation at the leaf scale (Evans, 1989). For various species, both light and leaf N attenuate with cumulative leaf area index counted from the top of the canopy (Field, 1983; Hirose and Werger, 1987). Leaf N vertical gradients have been regarded as an adaptive response to the local light environment, maximizing canopy photosynthesis and N utilization efficiency (Hirose and Werger, 1987; Hikosaka et al., 1994; Drouet and Bonhomme, 1999), as N is largely contained in the assimilatory enzyme Rubisco. Theoretical studies indicated that leaf N maximizes canopy photosynthesis when it parallels the light gradient (i.e. when the light [K_L] and N [K_N] extinction coefficients are equal), considering that the leaf N gradient is “optimal” in accordance with the “optimization theory” (Field, 1983; Hirose and Werger, 1987; Anten et al., 1995b).Factors other than the photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) might be responsible for the observed leaf N distribution. For instance, the acropetal gradients of leaf age (Hikosaka et al., 1994; Hikosaka, 2005) and light composition (Rousseaux et al., 1999) are known to strengthen the leaf N gradient. However, the impact of each of these factors has been shown to be much less than that of the PPFD gradient (Werger and Hirose, 1991; Pons and de Jong-van Berkel, 2004), although for the grass species Brachypodium pinnatum other factors than light might be involved (Pons et al., 1993). At the molecular level, the process could be driven by the import of compounds such as cytokinins transported in the transpiration stream (Pons et al., 2001; Boonman et al., 2007). Although the actual N distribution usually follows the light gradient, in all studies it is less steep than the calculated optimal N profile maximizing canopy photosynthesis (Pons et al., 1989; Yin et al., 2003). Possible reasons for this discrepancy have been discussed in detail by Kull (2002). Sink-source relations and in particular the demand for N could modulate the light-leaf N relationship (Dreccer et al., 1998), but conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of N availability on the light-leaf N relationship. While some authors found no effect of N availability (Sinclair and Shiraiwa, 1993; Milroy et al., 2001), others found that the N gradient relative to light (i.e. K_L/K_N) was steeper under low N (Hikosaka et al., 1994; Grindlay et al., 1995; Lötscher et al., 2003) or that the response of the light-leaf N relationship to N availability depended on the developmental stage (Dreccer et al., 2000). Interspecific differences in the light-leaf N relationship have also been reported and were related to differences in phenotypic plasticity (Aerts, 1996) or plant architecture (leaf stature and branching pattern; Anten et al., 1995a; Lötscher et al., 2003).Since canopy photosynthesis is dependent upon the leaf N gradient, it has been suggested that the pattern of leaf N distribution could be responsible for part of the genetic variability associated with the negative correlation between grain yield and protein concentration reported for various crop species (Dreccer et al., 1998). In wheat (Triticum aestivum), N accumulated before anthesis contributes 30% to 70% of grain N (Mi et al., 2000; Kichey et al., 2007). The efficiency of N translocation from the lower to the upper leaves may increase with the steepness of the N gradient, with only a negligible effect on canopy carbon gain integrated over the whole grain-filling period. This hypothesis is consistent with experimental studies based on a range of genotypes showing that, at a given grain yield level, grain protein concentration is positively related to the efficiency of N translocation either from the lower to the upper leaves (Wang et al., 2005) or from the leaves to the grains (Monaghan et al., 2001; Jukanti and Fischer, 2008). Only a few studies have investigated the intraspecific variability of the light-N relationship at the intraspecific level (Shiraiwa and Sinclair, 1993; Bindraban, 1999; Bertheloot et al., 2008; van Oosterom et al., 2010). For wheat, published analyses of the genetic variability of the light-leaf N relationship were limited to only two to five genotypes, and no genetic differences were found (Bindraban, 1999; Bertheloot et al., 2008).This paper focuses on the genetic variability of the vertical leaf N gradient with respect to light for wheat. Three main issues were investigated. What is the effect of N supply on the vertical distribution of leaf N? Does the distribution of leaf N with respect to light differ among genotypes? If the adjustment of leaf N to the light gradient varies with both the genotype and N supply, could this genetic and environmental variability have a unique ecophysiological determinant (driving variable)?These questions were addressed using 16 genotypes (Supplemental Table S1) covering a wide range of variation for N use efficiency (i.e. grain dry mass yield per unit of available mineral N from the soil and fertilizer), for grain protein concentration (Le Gouis et al., 2000; Foulkes et al., 2006; Gaju et al., 2011) and for the deviation from the negative correlation between grain yield and protein concentration (Oury et al., 2003). The 16 genotypes were grown in the field under two conditions of N supply (N− and N+ for low- and high-N treatments, respectively) in order to modulate crop N status at Clermont-Ferrand (CF) in France in two consecutive seasons (experiments CF07 and CF08). In addition, four of the 16 cultivars representing the variability observed for N utilization and N uptake efficiency were grown in the field under two conditions of N supply at Sutton Bonington (SB) in the United Kingdom in one season (experiment SB07). The distribution of leaf N was analyzed at anthesis. The first reason for this is that the distribution of both light and leaf N within the canopy is relatively stable from this phenological stage until almost the end of grain filling (Bertheloot et al., 2008). Whereas the canopy green area index (GAI) decreases dramatically during the grain-filling period, the structure of the canopy affecting light interception does not change significantly during that period. Both the vertical light and N distributions down the canopy are unchanged during most of the grain-filling period; therefore, the K_N-to-K_L ratio is constant during that period (Bertheloot et al., 2008). Similarly, Archontoulis et al. (2011) showed that K_N-to-K_L ratio is not modified during the vegetative and reproductive stages for field-gown sunflower (Helianthus annuus) crops. Therefore, as most of the final grain yield results from carbon assimilated after anthesis (Bidinger et al., 1977; Gebbing and Schnyder, 1999), the N distribution at anthesis is very relevant in terms of carbon assimilation and grain yield in wheat. A second reason is that the number and potential size of grains are determined around anthesis, which therefore appears as a critical stage in the formation of grain yield. A better understanding of the ecophysiological determinants of leaf N gradient at this phenological stage could consequently be crucial for improving wheat productivity and quality (Dreccer et al., 1998).     

A Chimeric Arabinogalactan Protein Promotes Somatic Embryogenesis in Cotton Cell Culture

Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) are a family of extracellular plant proteoglycans implicated in many aspects of plant growth and development, including in vitro somatic embryogenesis (SE). We found that specific AGPs were produced by cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) calli undergoing SE and that when these AGPs were isolated and incorporated into tissue culture medium, cotton SE was promoted. When the AGPs were partly or fully deglycosylated, SE-promoting activity was not diminished. Testing of AGPs separated by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography revealed that the SE-promoting activity resided in a hydrophobic fraction. We cloned a full-length complementary DNA (cotton PHYTOCYANIN-LIKE ARABINOGALACTAN-PROTEIN1 [GhPLA1]) that encoded the protein backbone of an AGP in the active fraction. It has a chimeric structure comprising an amino-terminal signal sequence, a phytocyanin-like domain, an AGP-like domain, and a hydrophobic carboxyl-terminal domain. Recombinant production of GhPLA1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells enabled us to purify and analyze a single glycosylated AGP and to demonstrate that this chimeric AGP promotes cotton SE. Furthermore, the nonglycosylated phytocyanin-like domain from GhPLA1, which was bacterially produced, also promoted SE, indicating that the glycosylated AGP domain was unnecessary for in vitro activity.Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) comprise a diverse group of plant proteoglycans (for review, see Fincher et al., 1993; Nothnagel, 1997; Seifert and Roberts, 2007; Ellis et al., 2010). They are structurally complex, generally consisting of a Pro-, Ala-, Ser-, and Thr-rich protein backbone that is extensively modified, principally by hydroxylation of Pro residues (to Hyp) and subsequent glycosylation through O-linkages with type II arabinogalactans (Tan et al., 2003; Shimizu et al., 2005). Many AGPs also have a C-terminal hydrophobic domain that is processed and replaced with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, which acts to tether the molecule to the extracellular face of the plasma membrane (Schultz et al., 1998). AGPs are also defined by their ability to be bound and precipitated by the synthetic dye β-glucosyl Yariv reagent (β-GlcY) and related molecules (Yariv et al., 1967). These dyes have been useful in isolating, localizing, and quantifying AGPs.AGPs are grouped into three subclasses (Schultz et al., 2002): AGPs have an N-terminal signal sequence, an arabinogalactosylated domain, and a hydrophobic C-terminal domain; “chimeric AGPs” contain at least one arabinogalactosylated domain and a domain with an unrelated motif; while “hybrid AGPs” contain arabinogalactosylated as well as different Pro/Hyp-rich glycoprotein motifs.AGPs are implicated in many aspects of plant cell growth and development. Historically, it was not possible to assign roles to individual AGPs, as tests were conducted with unfractionated mixtures of AGPs. More recently, individual AGPs, mainly from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), have been studied using techniques such as mutant analysis and gene knockout/silencing, providing evidence for roles of individual AGPs in cell expansion, root and seed regeneration, the coordination of vascular development, both male and female gametogenesis, the development of cotton fibers, and as contributors to plant stem strength (Shi et al., 2003; van Hengel and Roberts, 2003; Acosta-García and Vielle-Calzada, 2004; Motose et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2007; Levitin et al., 2008; Coimbra et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010; MacMillan et al., 2010).Conditioned media from in vitro embryogenic cultures contain factors that can promote somatic embryogenesis (SE), implying the presence of secreted signaling molecules (de Vries et al., 1988). There is evidence that secreted AGPs, which are components of conditioned media, are involved in SE. For example, SE in carrot (Daucus carota) and spruce (Picea abies) cell cultures was promoted when AGPs from conditioned media were added exogenously (Kreuger and van Holst, 1993; Egertsdotter and von Arnold, 1995). Subsequent studies showed the association of particular AGP epitopes with SE-promoting activity and the involvement of AGPs in SE for several other species (Kreuger et al., 1995; McCabe et al., 1997; Toonen et al., 1997; Chapman et al., 2000; Saare-Surminski et al., 2000; Ben Amar et al., 2007). There is also evidence that SE-promoting AGPs may be cleaved by an endochitinase (Egertsdotter and von Arnold, 1988; Domon et al., 2000; van Hengel et al., 2001, 2002), but neither the identity of the individual AGP(s) involved in promoting SE nor the mechanism of action has been established.In this study, we focused on SE in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ‘Coker 315’), which is a limiting step in cotton transformation, and the potential role of AGPs in this process. We show that cotton calli undergoing somatic embryogenesis secrete an AGP fraction that promotes SE when incorporated back into the growth medium. We report the cloning and sequencing of a complementary DNA (cDNA) encoding a chimeric AGP present in this fraction and show that this molecule promotes SE.     

Modifications of Sphingolipid Content Affect Tolerance to Hemibiotrophic and Necrotrophic Pathogens by Modulating Plant Defense Responses in Arabidopsis

Sphingolipids are emerging as second messengers in programmed cell death and plant defense mechanisms. However, their role in plant defense is far from being understood, especially against necrotrophic pathogens. Sphingolipidomics and plant defense responses during pathogenic infection were evaluated in the mutant of long-chain base phosphate (LCB-P) lyase, encoded by the dihydrosphingosine-1-phosphate lyase1 (AtDPL1) gene and regulating long-chain base/LCB-P homeostasis. Atdpl1 mutants exhibit tolerance to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea but susceptibility to the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst). Here, a direct comparison of sphingolipid profiles in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) during infection with pathogens differing in lifestyles is described. In contrast to long-chain bases (dihydrosphingosine [d18:0] and 4,8-sphingadienine [d18:2]), hydroxyceramide and LCB-P (phytosphingosine-1-phosphate [t18:0-P] and 4-hydroxy-8-sphingenine-1-phosphate [t18:1-P]) levels are higher in Atdpl1-1 than in wild-type plants in response to B. cinerea. Following Pst infection, t18:0-P accumulates more strongly in Atdpl1-1 than in wild-type plants. Moreover, d18:0 and t18:0-P appear as key players in Pst- and B. cinerea-induced cell death and reactive oxygen species accumulation. Salicylic acid levels are similar in both types of plants, independent of the pathogen. In addition, salicylic acid-dependent gene expression is similar in both types of B. cinerea-infected plants but is repressed in Atdpl1-1 after treatment with Pst. Infection with both pathogens triggers higher jasmonic acid, jasmonoyl-isoleucine accumulation, and jasmonic acid-dependent gene expression in Atdpl1-1 mutants. Our results demonstrate that sphingolipids play an important role in plant defense, especially toward necrotrophic pathogens, and highlight a novel connection between the jasmonate signaling pathway, cell death, and sphingolipids.Plants have evolved a complex array of defenses when attacked by microbial pathogens. The success of plant resistance first relies on the capacity of the plant to recognize its invader. Among early events, a transient production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), known as the oxidative burst, is characteristic of successful pathogen recognition (Torres, 2010). Perception of pathogen attack then initiates a large array of immune responses, including modification of cell walls, as well as the production of antimicrobial proteins and metabolites like pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins and phytoalexins, respectively (Schwessinger and Ronald, 2012). The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) are key players in the signaling networks involved in plant resistance (Bari and Jones, 2009; Tsuda and Katagiri, 2010; Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2011). Interactions between these signal molecules allow the plant to activate and/or modulate an appropriate array of defense responses, depending on the pathogen lifestyle, necrotroph or biotroph (Glazebrook, 2005; Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008). Whereas SA is considered essential for resistance to (hemi)biotrophic pathogens, it is assumed that JA and ET signaling pathways are important for resistance to necrotrophic pathogens in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Thomma et al., 2001; Glazebrook, 2005). A successful innate immune response often includes the so-called hypersensitive response (HR), a form of rapid programmed cell death (PCD) occurring in a limited area at the site of infection. This suicide of infected cells is thought to limit the spread of biotrophic pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes (Mur et al., 2008).During the past decade, significant progress has been made in our understanding of the cellular function of plant sphingolipids. Besides being structural components of cell membranes, sphingolipids are bioactive metabolites that regulate important cellular processes such as cell survival and PCD, occurring during either plant development or plant defense (Dunn et al., 2004; Berkey et al., 2012; Markham et al., 2013). The first evidence of the role of sphingolipids in these processes came from the use of the fungal toxins fumonisin B1 (FB1) and AAL, produced by the necrotrophic agent Alternaria alternata f. sp. lycopersici. These toxins are structural sphingosine (d18:1) analogs and function as ceramide synthase inhibitors. They triggered PCD when exogenously applied to plants. Mutant strains in which the production of such toxins is abrogated failed to infect the host plant, implying that toxin accumulation is required for pathogenicity and that the induction of plant PCD could be considered a virulence tool used by necrotrophic pathogens (Berkey et al., 2012). Moreover, several studies revealed that ceramides (Cers) and long-chain bases (LCBs) are also potent inducers of PCD in plants. For example, exogenously applied Cers and LCBs (d18:0, d18:1, or t18:0) induced PCD either in cell suspension cultures (Liang et al., 2003; Lachaud et al., 2010, 2011; Alden et al., 2011) or in whole seedlings (Shi et al., 2007; Takahashi et al., 2009; Saucedo-García et al., 2011). AAL- and FB1-induced PCD seemed to be due to the accumulation of free sphingoid bases (dihydrosphingosine [d18:0] and phytosphingosine [t18:0]; Abbas et al., 1994; Brandwagt et al., 2000; Shi et al., 2007). Spontaneous cell death in lag one homolog1 or l-myoinositol1-phosphate synthase mutant could be due to trihydroxy-LCB and/or Cer accumulation (Donahue et al., 2010; Ternes et al., 2011). Deciphering of Cer participation in the induction of HR and associated PCD also came from studies on accelerated cell death5 (acd5) and enhancing resistance to powdery mildew8 (RPW8)-mediated hypersensitive response (erh1) mutants, which displayed overaccumulation of Cers. These mutants exhibited spontaneous cell death and resistance to biotrophic pathogens, which seemed to be linked with SA and PR protein accumulation (Liang et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2008).Altogether, these data provide evidence of a link between PCD, defense, and sphingolipid metabolism. However, the fatty acid hydroxylase1/2 (atfah1/atfah2) double mutant that accumulates SA and Cers was more tolerant to the obligate biotrophic fungus Golovinomyces cichoracearum but did not display a PCD-like phenotype, suggesting that Cers alone are not involved in the induction of PCD (König et al., 2012). Moreover, Saucedo-García et al. (2011) postulated that dihydroxy-LCBs, but not trihydroxy-LCBs, might be primary mediators for LCB-induced PCD. The sphingoid base hydroxylase sbh1/sbh2 double mutant completely lacking trihydroxy-LCBs showed enhanced expression of PCD marker genes (Chen et al., 2008). On the contrary, increase in t18:0 was specifically sustained in plant interaction with the avirulent Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) strain and correlated with a strong PCD induction in leaves (Peer et al., 2010). Thus, the nature of sphingolipids able to induce PCD is still under debate and may evolve depending on plants and their environment. The phosphorylated form of LCBs (LCB-Ps) could abrogate PCD induced by LCBs, Cers, or heat stress in a dose-dependent manner (Shi et al., 2007; Alden et al., 2011). Furthermore, blocking the conversion of LCBs to LCB-Ps by using specific inhibitors induced PCD in cell suspension culture (Alden et al., 2011). Recently, overexpression of rice (Oryza sativa) LCB kinase in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants reduced PCD after treatment with FB1 (Zhang et al., 2013). Genetic mutation on LCB-P lyase encoded by the AtDPL1 gene, modifying the LCB-LCB-P ratio, could impact PCD levels after treatment with FB1 (Tsegaye et al., 2007). Altogether, these data point to the existence of a rheostat between LCBs and their phosphorylated forms that controls plant cell fate toward cell death or survival.Data on plant sphingolipid functions are still fragmentary. Only a few reports have described interconnections between sphingolipids, cell death, and plant defense responses, almost exclusively in response to (hemi)biotrophic pathogens. Knowledge about such relations in response to necrotrophic pathogens is still in its infancy (Rivas-San Vicente et al., 2013; Bi et al., 2014). In this report, the link between sphingolipids, cell death, and plant defense has been explored in response to Botrytis cinerea infection and in comparison with Pst infection. For this purpose, Atdpl1 mutant plants, disturbed in LCB/LCB-P accumulation without displaying any phenotype under standard growth conditions (Tsegaye et al., 2007), have been analyzed after pathogen infection. Our results revealed that modification of sphingolipid contents not only impacted plant tolerance to hemibiotrophs but also greatly affected resistance to necrotrophs. Whereas the SA signaling pathway is globally repressed in Atdpl1-1 compared with wild-type plants, the JA signaling pathway is significantly enhanced. Cell death and ROS accumulation are markedly modified in Atdpl1-1 mutant plants. We further demonstrated that phytosphingosine-1-phosphate (t18:0-P) and d18:0 are key players in pathogen-induced cell death and ROS generation. Here, we thus established a link between JA signaling, PCD, and sphingolipid metabolism.     

Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Nitric Oxide Production Contributes to Hydrogen-Promoted Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis

The signaling role of hydrogen gas (H₂) has attracted increasing attention from animals to plants. However, the physiological significance and molecular mechanism of H₂ in drought tolerance are still largely unexplored. In this article, we report that abscisic acid (ABA) induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) by triggering intracellular signaling events involving H₂, reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide (NO), and the guard cell outward-rectifying K⁺ channel (GORK). ABA elicited a rapid and sustained H₂ release and production in Arabidopsis. Exogenous hydrogen-rich water (HRW) effectively led to an increase of intracellular H₂ production, a reduction in the stomatal aperture, and enhanced drought tolerance. Subsequent results revealed that HRW stimulated significant inductions of NO and ROS synthesis associated with stomatal closure in the wild type, which were individually abolished in the nitric reductase mutant nitrate reductase1/2 (nia1/2) or the NADPH oxidase-deficient mutant rbohF (for respiratory burst oxidase homolog). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the HRW-promoted NO generation is dependent on ROS production. The rbohF mutant had impaired NO synthesis and stomatal closure in response to HRW, while these changes were rescued by exogenous application of NO. In addition, both HRW and hydrogen peroxide failed to induce NO production or stomatal closure in the nia1/2 mutant, while HRW-promoted ROS accumulation was not impaired. In the GORK-null mutant, stomatal closure induced by ABA, HRW, NO, or hydrogen peroxide was partially suppressed. Together, these results define a main branch of H₂-regulated stomatal movement involved in the ABA signaling cascade in which RbohF-dependent ROS and nitric reductase-associated NO production, and subsequent GORK activation, were causally involved.Stomata are responsible for leaves of terrestrial plants taking in carbon dioxide for photosynthesis and likewise regulate how much water plants evaporate through the stomatal pores (Chaerle et al., 2005). When experiencing water-deficient conditions, surviving plants balance photosynthesis with controlling water loss through the stomatal pores, which relies on turgor changes by pairs of highly differentiated epidermal cells surrounding the stomatal pore, called the guard cells (Haworth et al., 2011; Loutfy et al., 2012).Besides the characterization of the significant roles of abscisic acid (ABA) in regulating stomatal movement, the key factors in guard cell signal transduction have been intensively investigated by performing forward and reverse genetics approaches. For example, both reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) have been identified as vital intermediates in guard cell ABA signaling (Bright et al., 2006; Yan et al., 2007; Suzuki et al., 2011; Hao et al., 2012). The key ROS-producing enzymes in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) guard cells are the respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rboh) D and F (Kwak et al., 2003; Bright et al., 2006; Mazars et al., 2010; Marino et al., 2012). Current available data suggest that there are at least two distinct pathways responsible for NO synthesis involved in ABA signaling in guard cells: the nitrite reductase (NR)- and l-Arg-dependent pathways (Desikan et al., 2002; Besson-Bard et al., 2008). Genetic evidence further demonstrated that removal of the major known sources of either ROS or NO significantly impairs ABA-induced stomatal closure. ABA fails to induce ROS production in the atrbohD/F double mutant (Kwak et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2012) and NO synthesis in the NR-deficient mutant nitrate reductase1/2 (nia1/2; Bright et al., 2006; Neill et al., 2008), both of which lead to impaired stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Most importantly, ROS and NO, which function both synergistically and independently, have been established as ubiquitous signal transduction components to control a diverse range of physiological pathways in higher plants (Bright et al., 2006; Tossi et al., 2012).The guard cell outward-rectifying K⁺ channel (GORK) encodes the exclusive voltage-gated outwardly rectifying K⁺ channel protein, which was located in the guard cell membrane (Ache et al., 2000; Dreyer and Blatt, 2009). Expression profiles revealed that this gene is up-regulated upon the onset of drought, salinity, and cold stress and ABA exposure (Becker et al., 2003; Tran et al., 2013). Reverse genetic evidence further showed that GORK plays an important role in the control of stomatal movements and allows the plant to reduce transpirational water loss significantly (Hosy et al., 2003) and participates in the regulation of salinity tolerance by preventing salt-induced K⁺ loss (Jayakannan et al., 2013). Due to the high complexity of guard cell signaling cascades, whether and how ABA-triggered GORK up-regulation is attributed to the generation of cellular secondary messengers, such as ROS and NO, is less clear.Hydrogen gas (H₂) was recently revealed as a signaling modulator with multiple biological functions in clinical trails (Ohsawa et al., 2007; Itoh et al., 2009; Ito et al., 2012). It was previously found that a hydrogenase system could generate H₂ in bacteria and green algae (Meyer, 2007; Esquível et al., 2011). Although some earlier studies discovered the evolution of H₂ in several higher plant species (Renwick et al., 1964; Torres et al., 1984), it was also proposed that the eukaryotic hydrogenase-like protein does not metabolize H₂ (Cavazza et al., 2008; Mondy et al., 2014). Since the explosion limit of H₂ gas is about 4% to 72.4% (v/v, in the air), the direct application of H₂ gas in experiments is flammable and dangerous. Regardless of these problems to be resolved, the methodology, such as using exogenous hydrogen-rich water (HRW) or hydrogen-rich saline, which is safe, economical, and easily available, provides a valuable approach to investigate the physiological function of H₂ in animal research and clinical trials. For example, hydrogen dissolved in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium was found to react with cytotoxic ROS and thus protect against oxidative damage in PC12 cells and rats (Ohsawa et al., 2007). The neuroprotective effect of H₂-loaded eye drops on retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury was also reported (Oharazawa et al., 2010). In plants, corresponding results by using HRW combined with gas chromatography (GC) revealed that H₂ could act as a novel beneficial gaseous molecule in plant responses against salinity (Xie et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2013), cadmium stress (Cui et al., 2013), and paraquat toxicity (Jin et al., 2013). More recently, the observation that HRW could delay the postharvest ripening and senescence of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) was reported (Hu et al., 2014).Considering the fact that the signaling cascades for salt, osmotic, and drought stresses share a common cascade in an ABA-dependent pathway, it would be noteworthy to identify whether and how H₂ regulates the bioactivity of ABA-induced downstream components and, thereafter, biological responses, including stomatal closure and drought tolerance. To resolve these scientific questions, rbohD, rbohF, nia1/2, nitric oxide associated1 (noa1; Van Ree et al., 2011), nia1/2/noa1, and gork mutants were utilized to investigate the relationship among H₂, ROS, NO, and GORK in the guard cell signal transduction network. By the combination of pharmacological and biochemical analyses with this genetics-based approach, we provide comprehensive evidence to show that H₂ might be a newly identified bioeffective modulator involved in ABA signaling responsible for drought tolerance, that HRW-promoted stomatal closure was mainly attributed to the modulation of ROS-dependent NO generation, and that GORK might be the downstream target protein of H₂ signaling.     

S-Nitrosylation of Ascorbate Peroxidase Is Part of Programmed Cell Death Signaling in Tobacco Bright Yellow-2 Cells

Nitric oxide (NO) is a small redox molecule that acts as a signal in different physiological and stress-related processes in plants. Recent evidence suggests that the biological activity of NO is also mediated by S-nitrosylation, a well-known redox-based posttranslational protein modification. Here, we show that during programmed cell death (PCD), induced by both heat shock (HS) or hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 cells, an increase in S-nitrosylating agents occurred. NO increased in both experimentally induced PCDs, although with different intensities. In H₂O₂-treated cells, the increase in NO was lower than in cells exposed to HS. However, a simultaneous increase in S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), another NO source for S-nitrosylation, occurred in H₂O₂-treated cells, while a decrease in this metabolite was evident after HS. Consistently, different levels of activity and expression of GSNO reductase, the enzyme responsible for GSNO removal, were found in cells subjected to the two different PCD-inducing stimuli: low in H₂O₂-treated cells and high in the heat-shocked ones. Irrespective of the type of S-nitrosylating agent, S-nitrosylated proteins formed upon exposure to both of the PCD-inducing stimuli. Interestingly, cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX), a key enzyme controlling H₂O₂ levels in plants, was found to be S-nitrosylated at the onset of both PCDs. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed that S-nitrosylation of cAPX was responsible for the rapid decrease in its activity. The possibility that S-nitrosylation induces cAPX ubiquitination and degradation and acts as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD is discussed.Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous and diffusible redox molecule that acts as a signaling compound in both animal and plant systems (Pacher et al., 2007; Besson-Bard et al., 2008). In plants, NO has been found to play a key role in several physiological processes, such as germination, lateral root development, flowering, senescence, stomatal closure, and growth of pollen tubes (Beligni and Lamattina, 2000; Neill et al., 2002; Correa-Aragunde et al., 2004; He et al., 2004; Prado et al., 2004; Carimi et al., 2005). In addition, NO has been reported to be involved in plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses (Leitner et al., 2009; Siddiqui et al., 2011) and in the signaling pathways leading to programmed cell death (PCD; Delledonne et al., 1998; de Pinto et al., 2006; De Michele et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2012; Serrano et al., 2012).The cellular environment may greatly influence the chemical reactivity of NO, giving rise to different biologically active NO-derived compounds, collectively named reactive nitrogen species, which amplify and differentiate its ability to activate physiological and stress-related processes. Many of the biological properties of NO are due to its high affinity with transition metals of metalloproteins as well as its reactivity with reactive oxygen species (ROS; Hill et al., 2010). However, recent evidence suggests that protein S-nitrosylation, due to the addition of NO to reactive Cys thiols, may act as a key mechanism of NO signaling in plants (Wang et al., 2006; Astier et al., 2011). NO is also able to react with reduced glutathione (GSH), the most abundant cellular thiol, thus producing S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), which also acts as an endogenous trans-nitrosylating agent. GSNO is also considered as a NO store and donor and, as it is more stable than NO, acts as a long-distance NO transporter through the floematic flux (Malik et al., 2011). S-Nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR), which is an enzyme conserved from bacteria to humans, has been suggested to play a role in regulating S-nitrosothiols (SNO) and the turnover of S-nitrosylated proteins in plants (Liu et al., 2001; Rusterucci et al., 2007).A number of proteins involved in metabolism, stress responses, and redox homeostasis have been identified as potential targets for S-nitrosylation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Lindermayr et al., 2005). During the hypersensitive response (HR), 16 proteins were identified to be S-nitrosylated in the seedlings of the same species (Romero-Puertas et al., 2008); in Citrus species, S-nitrosylation of about 50 proteins occurred in the NO-mediated resistance to high salinity (Tanou et al., 2009).However, while the number of candidate proteins for S-nitrosylation is increasing, the functional significance of protein S-nitrosylation has been explained only in a few cases, such as for nonsymbiotic hemoglobin (Perazzolli et al., 2004), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Lindermayr et al., 2005; Wawer et al., 2010), Met adenosyltransferase (Lindermayr et al., 2006), and metacaspase9 (Belenghi et al., 2007). Of particular interest are the cases in which S-nitrosylation involves enzymes controlling ROS homeostasis. For instance, it has been reported that S-nitrosylation of peroxiredoxin IIE regulates the antioxidant function of this enzyme and might contribute to the HR (Romero-Puertas et al., 2007). It has also been shown that in the immunity response, S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase inactivates the enzyme, thus reducing ROS production and controlling HR development (Yun et al., 2011).Recently, S-nitrosylation has also been shown to be involved in PCD of nitric oxide excess1 (noe1) rice (Oryza sativa) plants, which are mutated in the OsCATC gene coding for catalase (Lin et al., 2012). In these plants, which show PCD-like phenotypes under high-light conditions, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and thioredoxin are S-nitrosylated. This suggests that the NO-dependent regulation of these proteins is involved in plant PCD, similar to what occurs in animal apoptosis (Sumbayev, 2003; Hara et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2012). The increase in hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) after exposure to high light in noe1 plants is responsible for the production of NO required for leaf cell death induction (Lin et al., 2012). There is a strict relationship between H₂O₂ and NO in PCD activation (Delledonne et al., 2001; de Pinto et al., 2002); however, the mechanism of this interplay is largely still unknown (for review, see Zaninotto et al., 2006; Zhao, 2007; Yoshioka et al., 2011). NO can induce ROS production and vice versa, and their reciprocal modulation in terms of intensity and timing seems to be crucial in determining PCD activation and in controlling HR development (Delledonne et al., 2001; Zhao, 2007; Yun et al., 2011).In previous papers, we demonstrated that heat shock (HS) at 55°C and treatment with 50 mm H₂O₂ promote PCD in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells (Vacca et al., 2004; de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008). In both experimental conditions, NO production and decrease in cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX) were observed as early events in the PCD pathway, and cAPX decrease has been suggested to contribute to determining the redox environment required for PCD (de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008).In this study, the production of nitrosylating agents (NO and GSNO) in the first hours of PCD induction by HS or H₂O₂ treatment in tobacco BY-2 cells and their role in PCD were studied. The possibility that S-nitrosylation could be a first step in regulating cAPX activity and turnover as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD was also investigated.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Distribution of Transglutaminase in Pear Pollen Tubes in Relation to Cytoskeleton and Membrane Dynamics

Transglutaminases (TGases) are ubiquitous enzymes that take part in a variety of cellular functions. In the pollen tube, cytoplasmic TGases are likely to be involved in the incorporation of primary amines at selected peptide-bound glutamine residues of cytosolic proteins (including actin and tubulin), while cell wall-associated TGases are believed to regulate pollen tube growth. Using immunological probes, we identified TGases associated with different subcellular compartments (cytosol, membranes, and cell walls). Binding of cytosolic TGase to actin filaments was shown to be Ca²⁺ dependent. The membrane TGase is likely associated with both Golgi-derived structures and the plasma membrane, suggesting a Golgi-based exocytotic delivery of TGase. Association of TGase with the plasma membrane was also confirmed by immunogold transmission electron microscopy. Immunolocalization of TGase indicated that the enzyme was present in the growing region of pollen tubes and that the enzyme colocalizes with cell wall markers. Bidimensional electrophoresis indicated that different TGase isoforms were present in distinct subcellular compartments, suggesting either different roles or different regulatory mechanisms of enzyme activity. The application of specific inhibitors showed that the distribution of TGase in different subcellular compartments was regulated by both membrane dynamics and cytoskeleton integrity, suggesting that delivery of TGase to the cell wall requires the transport of membranes along cytoskeleton filaments. Taken together, these data indicate that a cytoplasmic TGase interacts with the cytoskeleton, while a different TGase isoform, probably delivered via a membrane/cytoskeleton-based transport system, is secreted in the cell wall of pear (Pyrus communis) pollen tubes, where it might play a role in the regulation of apical growth.Transglutaminases (TGases [EC 2.3.2.13]; protein-Gln γ-glutamyltransferase) are a family of ubiquitous Ca²⁺-activated enzymes that are involved in animal cell morphogenesis and differentiation, apoptosis, cell death, inflammation, cell migration, and wound healing (Griffin et al., 2002; Mehta et al., 2006; Beninati et al., 2009). TGases are associated with different subcellular compartments, such as cytosol, plasma membrane, nucleus, mitochondria, and extracellular matrix. The specific localization of TGases is likely to determine both the biochemical activity and the type of proteins and/or substrates with which TGases react (Park et al., 2010). The distribution profile of TGase is affected by Ca²⁺, since the enzyme is preferentially associated with the lysosome compartment of liver cells in the absence of Ca²⁺ (Juprelle-Soret et al., 1984).TGase was initially detected in association with the cytosol, with the particulate (probably the microsomal) fraction (Birckbichler et al., 1976), and with the nucleus of animal cells (Remington and Russell, 1982). The association of TGase with the plasma membrane was related to its activity in promoting cell adhesion and to the interaction of cells with the extracellular matrix, while the presence of TGase in the nucleus is likely related to cell apoptosis (Griffin et al., 2002). How TGase is delivered to its final destination in animal cells remains to be clarified. Since the cytoskeleton is essential for the correct positioning of proteins in the cells, this interplay has often been studied in terms of potential substrates of TGase activity (Griffin et al., 2002). For example, the TGase-mediated incorporation of polyamines (PAs) stimulates actin polymerization (Takashi, 1988; Griffin et al., 2002). TGase was also found to associate with myosin in stress fibers of vascular smooth cells (Chowdhury et al., 1997). The association between TGase and microtubules (MTs) was initially studied in view of the importance of MTs in Alzheimer’s disease (Griffin et al., 2002), whereas the dynamics of MTs is also likely to be controlled by TGase (Al-Jallad et al., 2011). Interestingly, MTs are also a substrate of TGase activity in cells committed to apoptosis (Piredda et al., 1999). TGase was also shown to posttranslationally modify MT-associated proteins such as tau (Griffin et al., 2002).Information about the localization and function of TGases in plant cells is limited. Following the early evidence of an enzyme-based incorporation of PAs in plants (Serafini-Fracassini et al., 1988), a number of reports described the presence and role of TGase in nonphotosynthetic/photosynthetic tissues and in isolated chloroplasts (Serafini-Fracassini and Del Duca, 2008, and refs. therein). Attempts have also been made to examine the differences and similarities between plant and animal TGases. For example, a tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) TGase was proposed to be involved in the programmed cell death (PCD) of the flower corolla (Della Mea et al., 2007); in such a case, TGase is likely to be released into the cell wall by a Golgi vesicle-based transport. Plant TGases might also be involved in protection against viruses (Del Duca et al., 2007) and in the self-incompatibility (SI) response involving pollen and stigma during sexual reproduction (Del Duca et al., 2010). Recently, different TGase isoforms were detected in meristematic apices of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) tuber sprouts (Beninati et al., 2013).The pollen tube is a widely investigated tip-growing plant cell (Lee and Yang, 2008). Studies are generally aimed at clarifying the many aspects related either to its growth or to rejection by the stigma/style. Early evidence for a role of PAs during pollen tube emergence (Bagni et al., 1981) was confirmed through the detection of PA binding via a Ca²⁺-activated TGase activity (Del Duca et al., 1997) and later by the identification of actin and tubulin as substrates of purified pollen TGase (Del Duca et al., 2009). In pollen, the enzyme affected the polymerization state and activity of actin filaments (AFs) and MTs (Del Duca et al., 2009) and existed as both soluble and cell wall associated (Di Sandro et al., 2010). Visualization of fluorescently labeled TGase products indicated that the cross-linking activity of TGase occurred at the apex of pollen tubes, in a basal region close to the pollen grain and within the pollen grain itself (Iorio et al., 2008). The enzyme was found as a soluble cytoplasmic form likely involved in the regulation of unspecified physiological processes (possibly associated with the cytoskeleton; Del Duca et al., 2009).Although the association of pollen TGases with organelles/vesicles has not been reported, an extracellular form of a Ca²⁺-dependent TGase was shown to be involved in pollen tube growth (likely as a modulator of cell wall building and strengthening). Moreover, pollen TGase was secreted in the incubation medium during germination, where it might catalyze the cross linking of PAs with secreted proteins (Di Sandro et al., 2010). This suggests that pollen TGase may be secreted through a vesicle-based mechanism. Finally, a TGase activity was also observed in planta, consistent with a possible role of TGase during tube migration through the style (Di Sandro et al., 2010) or in the SI response of pollen tubes (Del Duca et al., 2010).The pollen tube is an excellent model to study how a given plant protein is either secreted or delivered to its final destination. Although we know that actin and tubulin are substrates of TGase activity, and that the active enzyme is located in the cell wall and released outside, how TGase is distributed in the cells and how this process is dependent on cytoskeleton and membrane dynamics remain unknown. Here, we wanted to study in detail the localization and distribution of TGase in growing pollen tubes of pear (Pyrus communis) in relation to both cytoskeleton and membrane dynamics. The aim was to shed light on the mechanism by which TGase is transported and secreted, a process that is still not well understood even in animal cells. Specific antibodies that cross react with the TGase of pollen tubes were used to localize the enzyme in different membrane compartments and in the cell wall. The use of specific inhibitors indicated that the delivery of extracellular TGase is dependent on both AFs and membrane dynamics. Analysis by bidimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) showed that distinct TGase isoforms are associated with different cell compartments, suggesting that TGase might be differently regulated according to its position in the cell. Together, these data may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying pollen tube growth, an essential aspect of fertilization processes.     

Distinct Detoxification Mechanisms Confer Resistance to Mesotrione and Atrazine in a Population of Waterhemp

Previous research reported the first case of resistance to mesotrione and other 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) herbicides in a waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population designated MCR (for McLean County mesotrione- and atrazine-resistant). Herein, experiments were conducted to determine if target site or nontarget site mechanisms confer mesotrione resistance in MCR. Additionally, the basis for atrazine resistance was investigated in MCR and an atrazine-resistant but mesotrione-sensitive population (ACR for Adams County mesotrione-sensitive but atrazine-resistant). A standard sensitive population (WCS for Wayne County herbicide-sensitive) was also used for comparison. Mesotrione resistance was not due to an alteration in HPPD sequence, HPPD expression, or reduced herbicide absorption. Metabolism studies using whole plants and excised leaves revealed that the time for 50% of absorbed mesotrione to degrade in MCR was significantly shorter than in ACR and WCS, which correlated with previous phenotypic responses to mesotrione and the quantity of the metabolite 4-hydroxy-mesotrione in excised leaves. The cytochrome P450 monooxygenase inhibitors malathion and tetcyclacis significantly reduced mesotrione metabolism in MCR and corn (Zea mays) excised leaves but not in ACR. Furthermore, malathion increased mesotrione activity in MCR seedlings in greenhouse studies. These results indicate that enhanced oxidative metabolism contributes significantly to mesotrione resistance in MCR. Sequence analysis of atrazine-resistant (MCR and ACR) and atrazine-sensitive (WCS) waterhemp populations detected no differences in the psbA gene. The times for 50% of absorbed atrazine to degrade in corn, MCR, and ACR leaves were shorter than in WCS, and a polar metabolite of atrazine was detected in corn, MCR, and ACR that cochromatographed with a synthetic atrazine-glutathione conjugate. Thus, elevated rates of metabolism via distinct detoxification mechanisms contribute to mesotrione and atrazine resistance within the MCR population.Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) is a troublesome annual weed species in midwestern U.S. corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) production. The change to production systems with limited tillage has favored waterhemp germination and growth (Hager et al., 2002). Waterhemp seeds are small, and one female plant can produce up to one million seeds (Steckel et al., 2003), which endow waterhemp with an effective short-distance dispersal mechanism. In addition, multiple herbicide resistance mechanisms in waterhemp are facilitated by its dioecious biology and wind-pollinated flowers (Steckel, 2007). The long-distance flow of pollen may be one of the main reasons that multiple herbicide resistance in waterhemp has become widespread in the United States (Liu et al., 2012).Mesotrione (2-[4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzoyl]-1,3-cyclohexanedione) belongs to the triketone class of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibiting herbicides (Beaudegnies et al., 2009). Molecular information regarding plant HPPD gene sequences and expression patterns is limited (for review, see Pallett, 2000; Kim and Petersen, 2002; Riechers and Stanford, 2002; Matringe et al., 2005), and only a single expressed HPPD gene was detected in waterhemp (Riggins et al., 2010). Herbicidal activity of mesotrione in sensitive plants is due to competitive inhibition of the HPPD enzyme, which is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of tocopherols and plastoquinone. Plastoquinone is an electron acceptor for the phytoene desaturase reaction in the pathway of carotenoid biosynthesis and also serves as an electron acceptor in PSII (Hess, 2000). Tocopherols and carotenoids are responsible for the detoxification of reactive oxygen species and scavenging of free radicals in plant tissues (Maeda and DellaPenna, 2007; Triantaphylidès and Havaux, 2009; Mène-Saffrané and DellaPenna, 2010), and carotenoids also protect chlorophyll from photooxidation (Cazzonelli and Pogson, 2010). Following mesotrione treatment, carotenoid biosynthesis is inhibited in sensitive plants, resulting in bleaching and necrosis. In particular, new leaves and meristems are primarily affected due to the need for protective carotenoids and tocopherols in photosynthetic tissues (Triantaphylidès and Havaux, 2009) and the systemic nature of mesotrione, which is translocated in the phloem (Mitchell et al., 2001; Beaudegnies et al., 2009).There are two main mechanisms of herbicide resistance in plants: (1) target site alterations, such as mutations that affect herbicide-binding kinetics or amplification of the target site gene (Powles and Yu, 2010), and (2) nontarget site mechanisms, including metabolism, translocation, and sequestration (Yuan et al., 2007; Powles and Yu, 2010). Metabolic detoxification is a common nontarget-based mechanism for herbicide resistance, which typically may result from elevated levels of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (P450) or glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity (Powles and Yu, 2010; Délye et al., 2011). In addition to conferring resistance in weeds, these enzymes also confer natural tolerance in crops (Kreuz et al., 1996; Riechers et al., 2010). Similar to tolerant sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) lines (Abit and Al-Khatib, 2009), corn is tolerant to mesotrione via rapid metabolism (i.e. ring hydroxylation catalyzed by P450 activity) in combination with slower uptake relative to sensitive weeds and a less sensitive form of the HPPD enzyme in grasses relative to dicots (Hawkes et al., 2001; Mitchell et al., 2001).Atrazine (2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-S-triazine) is a symmetrical triazine herbicide commonly used in corn to selectively control annual dicot weeds. Atrazine disrupts electron transport by competing with plastoquinone for the secondary electron-accepting plastoquinone-binding site on the D1 protein of PSII in chloroplasts (Hess, 2000). Atrazine resistance in weeds can be due to a mutation in the psbA gene that causes a Ser-Gly substitution at amino acid position 264 of the D1 protein (Hirschberg and McIntosh, 1983; Devine and Preston, 2000). Corn and grain sorghum are naturally tolerant to atrazine via the rapid metabolism of atrazine through conjugation with reduced glutathione (GSH; Frear and Swanson, 1970; Lamoureux et al., 1973), which is catalyzed by GST activities (Shimabukuro et al., 1971). Enhanced metabolism of atrazine and simazine in weedy species has been reported in Abutilon theophrasti, Lolium rigidum, and Alopecurus myosuroides due to either GST- or P450-mediated detoxification mechanisms (Burnet et al., 1993; Gray et al., 1996; Cummins et al., 1999; Délye et al., 2011).A population of waterhemp (designated MCR for McLean County mesotrione- and atrazine-resistant) from Illinois is resistant to HPPD inhibitors (Hausman et al., 2011) and atrazine as well as to acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides. A different population of waterhemp (designated ACR for Adams County mesotrione-sensitive but atrazine-resistant; Patzoldt et al., 2005) that is atrazine resistant but sensitive to mesotrione (Hausman et al., 2011) and a waterhemp population (designated WCS for Wayne County herbicide-sensitive; Patzoldt et al., 2005) that is sensitive to both mesotrione and atrazine (Hausman et al., 2011) were used in comparison with MCR in this research. MCR displayed 10- and 35-fold resistance to mesotrione in comparison with ACR and WCS, respectively, in greenhouse studies (Hausman et al., 2011). In addition, waterhemp populations with similar patterns of multiple resistance have recently been identified (Hausman et al., 2011; McMullan and Green, 2011; Heap, 2012). However, the mechanisms of resistance to mesotrione and atrazine in these waterhemp populations are currently unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if the multiple-herbicide-resistant phenotype of MCR (in regard to mesotrione and atrazine resistance) is due to either target site or nontarget site mechanisms.