共查询到2条相似文献,搜索用时 1 毫秒
1.
Peter K. Jones Royce H. Holtkamp William A. Palmer Michael D. Day 《Biocontrol Science and Technology》2015,25(6):613-628
The host range of two newly imported biotypes of Dactylopius tomentosus and their potential as biological control agents of Cylindropuntia spp. were investigated. A third biotype (‘imbricata’) of D. tomentosus previously released in Australia to control C. imbricata was also screened to determine if it will feed on other species of Cylindropuntia occurring in Australia. Efficacy trials were conducted to evaluate the ability of the biotypes to retard the growth or kill those plant species supporting development of four or more individuals in the host test trials. The host range of the three biotypes of D. tomentosus was restricted to the genus Cylindropuntia. However, the biotypes showed varying degrees of specificity within this genus. The ‘imbricata’ biotype was the only biotype to develop on Australian C. rosea provenances, albeit with a range of developmental success on all C. rosea provenances tested. The Spanish provenance supported the highest development success followed by Grawin (NSW), Lorne Station (NSW) while the least preferred was the Mexican provenance. The ‘rosea’ and ‘cholla’ biotypes were unsuitable candidates to control C. rosea in Australia. However, the efficacy trials showed that the ‘cholla’ biotype had a high impact on four of the eight naturalised Cylindropuntia species in Australia. This biotype established rapidly and the sustained feeding of one fecund female and her progeny killed potted plants of C. imbricata and C. fulgida at week 18. This biotype has the potential to be an effective agent against C. fulgida, C. imbricata, C. kleiniae and C. tunicata and, as a consequence, an application seeking its release in Australia has been lodged. 相似文献
2.
Eight Cylindropuntia species have naturalised in Australia and pose serious economic, environmental and social impacts. The host range of four additional biotypes of D. tomentosus from southern USA was investigated. Feeding and development were restricted to the genus Cylindropuntia. However, they showed differences in specificity within this genus and some biotypes discriminated between the provenances of Cylindropuntia rosea and Cylindropuntia tunicata. Efficacy trials were conducted to determine whether populations of each biotype could be sustained on the naturalised Cylindropuntia species and if these populations could retard the growth or kill these plants. The ‘acanthocarpa’ biotype offers potential control of C. rosea (Lorne Station), while the ‘cylindropuntia sp.’ biotype shows great potential to control C. rosea (Grawin). The ‘cylindropuntia sp.’ biotype also had a high impact on Cylindropuntia kleiniae and Cylindropuntia imbricata, and a moderate impact on Cylindropuntia leptocaulis and Cylindropuntia prolifera. The ‘acanthocarpa?×?echinocarpa’ biotype had its greatest impact on C. tunicata (Grawin), killing this plant in 18 weeks. A fourth biotype, ‘leptocaulis’, was damaging to some species, but was less effective than the other biotypes. Cylindropuntia spinosior is the only naturalised species in Australia where no effective biocontrol agent has been found. 相似文献