Regulation of progesterone receptor isoforms content in human astrocytoma cell lines

Progesterone regulates several functions through the interaction with its intracellular receptor (PR) which expresses two isoforms with different functions and regulation: PR-A and PR-B. Both PR isoforms have been detected in human astrocytomas, the most common and aggressive primary brain tumours, but their regulation and function are unknown. We studied the effects of estradiol, progesterone and their receptor antagonists (ICI 182,780 and RU 486) on PR isoforms content in U373 and D54 human astrocytoma cell lines, respectively derived from grades III and IV astrocytomas, by Western blot analysis. In U373 cells we also evaluated the effects of PR-A overexpression on cell growth. We observed that in U373 cells estradiol increased the content of both PR isoforms whereas in D54 cells it had no effects. Estradiol effects were blocked by ICI 182,780. In both cell lines, PR isoforms content was down-regulated by progesterone after estradiol treatment. This effect was blocked by RU 486. We observed that overexpression of PR-A significantly diminished the increase in U373 cells number produced after progesterone treatment. Our results suggest a differential PR isoforms regulation depending on the evolution grade of human astrocytoma cells, and an inhibitory role of PR-A on progesterone effects on astrocytomas cell growth.     

Progesterone-independent effects of human progesterone receptors (PRs) in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: PR isoform-specific gene regulation and tumor biology

Progesterone receptors (PRs) are prognostic markers in breast cancers irrespective of the patient's progestational status. However, there are two PR isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, that are equimolar in the normal breast but dysregulated in advanced disease. Postmenopausal, tamoxifen-treated patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, PR-A-rich tumors have much faster disease recurrence than patients with PR-B-rich tumors. To study the mechanisms we engineered ER+ breast cancer cells that express each PR isoform under control of an inducible promoter. We identified 79 genes regulated by progesterone (P), mainly by PR-B, and 51 genes regulated without progesterone, mainly by PR-A. Only nine genes were regulated with and without ligand, leading to definition of three classes: I) genes regulated only by liganded PR; II) genes regulated only by unliganded PR; III) genes regulated by both. Unliganded PR-A and PR-B differentially regulate genes that coordinate extracellular signaling pathways and influence tumor cell biology. Indeed, in the absence of P, compared with ER+/PR-B+ or PR- cells, ER+, PR-A+ cells exhibit an aggressive phenotype, are more adhesive to an extracellular matrix, and are more migratory. Additionally, unliganded PR-A and PR-B both inhibit cell growth and provoke resistance to Taxol-induced apoptosis. We propose that PR-A:PR-B ratios, even in the absence of P, influence the biology and treatment response of ER+ tumors, that PR-A isoforms are functionally dominant in P-deficient states, and that PR-A rich tumors are especially aggressive.     

R5020 and RU486 act as progesterone receptor agonists to enhance Sp1/Sp4-dependent gene transcription by an indirect mechanism

It has been suggested that ligand-dependent gene activation by the progesterone receptor (PR) can result from recruitment of PR by the promoter bound Sp1. A detailed investigation of the Sp1-dependent agonistic activity of RU486 and R5020 on the folate receptor (FR) type alpha, p27, thymidine kinase 1 and p21 genes reveals a different mechanism. The FR-alpha P4 promoter and the endogenous FR-alpha gene were up-regulated by the PR agonist R5020 through either PR-A or PR-B. The classical antagonist RU486 also activated the promoter but only through PR-B. The most proximal (essential) G/C-rich (Sp1 binding) element and the initiator region constituted the minimal promoter responsive to PR regulation; substitution with a stronger cluster of G/C-rich elements enhanced the magnitude of the PR response. In contrast, substitution of the G/C-rich element with a TATA box resulted in the loss of regulation by PR. Overexpression of Sp1 and Sp4 but not Sp3 enhanced activation of the FR-alpha promoter by PR, knocking down Sp1 decreased the activation in a manner that was reversed by ectopic Sp1 or Sp4. The ligand-dependent action of PR on the promoter was delayed compared with its activation of a classical glucocorticoid response element-driven promoter and activation of both the promoter and the endogenous FR-alpha gene by PR required new protein synthesis. Activation by PR paralleled RNA polymerase II recruitment but was not accompanied by either association of PR or a change in the association of Sp1 with the endogenous FR-alpha P4 promoter. Similar observations were made for PR regulation of the genes encoding p27, thymidine kinase 1, and p21. The results contradict the current view of Sp1-dependent gene regulation by PR and point to the existence of one or more PR target genes whose promoter and cell context(s) must thus be key determinants of the agonistic activity of RU486 on a large group of important Sp1-dependent downstream target genes.     

Expression of progesterone receptor isoforms A and B is differentially regulated by estrogen in different breast cancer cell lines

Progesterone action in target tissues is mediated through two progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, which display different regulatory functions in target cells. Relative expression ratio of these isoforms varies depending on cell and tissue types. Here, we studied the regulation of PR isoform expression by estradiol (E(2)), insulin, IGF-1 and cAMP in different breast cancer cell lines. Although, E(2) induced PR expression in all cell lines studied, the expression ratio of PR-A/PR-B induced by E(2) was dependent on the cell line. The differential regulation of the isoforms was also seen at the mRNA level suggesting that the PR-A and PR-B promoters are differentially regulated by E(2) in different breast cancer cells. Insulin, IGF-1 or cAMP previously reported to induce PR expression however failed to alter the PR expression in our study. This is the first report describing that in different breast cancer cell lines the expression of PR-A and PR-B is regulated by E(2) in a distinct way.     

Nuclear progesterone receptor A and B isoforms in mouse fallopian tube and uterus: implications for expression, regulation, and cellular function

Progesterone and its interaction with nuclear progesterone receptors (PR) PR-A and PR-B play a critical role in the regulation of female reproductive function in all mammals. However, our knowledge of the regulation and possible cellular function of PR protein isoforms in the fallopian tube and uterus in vivo is still very limited. In the present study, we revealed that equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) treatment resulted in a time-dependent increase in expression of both isoforms, reaching a maximal level at 48 h in the fallopian tube. Regulation of PR-A protein expression paralleled that of PR-B protein expression. However, in the uterus PR-B protein levels increased and peaked earlier than PR-A protein levels after eCG treatment. With prolonged exposure to eCG, PR-B protein levels decreased, whereas PR-A protein levels continued to increase. Furthermore, subsequent treatment with human (h)CG decreased the levels of PR protein isoforms in both tissues in parallel with increased endogenous serum progesterone levels. To further elucidate whether progesterone regulates PR protein isoforms, we demonstrated that a time-dependent treatment with progesterone (P(4)) decreased the expression of PR protein isoforms in both tissues, whereas decreases in p27, cyclin D(2), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen protein levels were observed only in the uterus. To define the potential PR-mediated effects on apoptosis, we demonstrated that the PR antagonist treatment increased the levels of PR protein isoforms, induced mitochondrial-associated apoptosis, and decreased in epidermal growth factor (EGF) and EGF receptor protein expression in both tissues. Interestingly, immunohistochemistry indicated that the induction of apoptosis by PR antagonists was predominant in the epithelium, whereas increase in PR protein expression was observed in stromal cells of both tissues. Taken together, these observations suggest that 1) the tissue-specific and hormonal regulation of PR isoform expression in mouse fallopian tube and uterus, where they are potentially involved in regulation of mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis depending on the cellular compartment; and 2) a possible interaction between functional PR protein and growth factor signaling may have a coordinated role for regulating apoptotic process in both tissues in vivo.     

Hormone-dependent changes in A and B forms of progesterone receptor

The influence of different estrogen and/or progesterone treatments on concentrations of A and B forms of progesterone receptor (PR-A and PR-B) in the different cell types of chick oviduct was studied. A semiquantitative immunohistochemical assay for cellular PR concentrations was developed using a computer-assisted image analysis system. The staining intensity of nuclear PR in the basal layer of epithelial cells, glandular, smooth muscle and mesothelial cells was analysed separately using two monoclonal antibodies, PR6 and PR22. The measured concentrations of PR varied between different cell types and from cell to cell. A significant decrease in PR concentration, as noted by a decrease in staining intensity, was observed in all cell types studied 2 or 6 h after a single injection of progesterone with or without simultaneous estrogen administration. The decrease was also verified with immunoblotting and an immunoenzymometric assay (IEMA) for chicken PR. After down-regulation the concentration of PR recovered to the control level within 48 h after progesterone or estrogen administration. Estrogen administration alone was observed to cause changes in the concentration of PR-A only, having little or no effect on PR-B concentration depending on the cell type studied.

These findings indicate that estrogen and progesterone cause cell-specific changes not only to the total concentration of PR but also to the cellular ratio of PR-A and PR-B.