Light variability illuminates niche-partitioning among marine Picocyanobacteria

Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus picocyanobacteria are dominant contributors to marine primary production over large areas of the ocean. Phytoplankton cells are entrained in the water column and are thus often exposed to rapid changes in irradiance within the upper mixed layer of the ocean. An upward fluctuation in irradiance can result in photosystem II photoinactivation exceeding counteracting repair rates through protein turnover, thereby leading to net photoinhibition of primary productivity, and potentially cell death. Here we show that the effective cross-section for photosystem II photoinactivation is conserved across the picocyanobacteria, but that their photosystem II repair capacity and protein-specific photosystem II light capture are negatively correlated and vary widely across the strains. The differences in repair rate correspond to the light and nutrient conditions that characterize the site of origin of the Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus isolates, and determine the upward fluctuation in irradiance they can tolerate, indicating that photoinhibition due to transient high-light exposure influences their distribution in the ocean.     

Genomic investigation of the system for selenocysteine incorporation in the bacterial domain

The Photosystem II complex (PSII) is susceptible to inactivation by strong light, and the inactivation caused by strong light is referred to as photoinactivation or photoinhibition. In photosynthetic organisms, photoinactivated PSII is rapidly repaired and the extent of photoinactivation reflects the balance between the light-induced damage (photodamage) to PSII and the repair of PSII. In this study, we examined these two processes separately and quantitatively under stress conditions in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. The rate of photodamage was proportional to light intensity over a range of light intensities from 0 to 2000 microE m(-2) s(-1), and this relationship was not affected by environmental factors, such as salt stress, oxidative stress due to H2O2, and low temperature. The rate of repair also depended on light intensity. It was high under weak light and reached a maximum of 0.1 min(-1) at 300 microE m(-2) s(-1). By contrast to the rate of photodamage, the rate of repair was significantly reduced by the above-mentioned environmental factors. Pulse-labeling experiments with radiolabeled methionine revealed that these environmental factors inhibited the synthesis de novo of proteins. Such proteins included the D1 protein which plays an important role in the photodamage-repair cycle. These observations suggest that the repair of PSII under environmental stress might be the critical step that determines the outcome of the photodamage-repair cycle.     

Very strong UV-A light temporally separates the photoinhibition of photosystem II into light-induced inactivation and repair

When organisms that perform oxygenic photosynthesis are exposed to strong visible or UV light, inactivation of photosystem II (PSII) occurs. However, such organisms are able rapidly to repair the photoinactivated PSII. The phenomenon of photoinactivation and repair is known as photoinhibition. Under normal laboratory conditions, the rate of repair is similar to or faster than the rate of photoinactivation, preventing the detailed analysis of photoinactivation and repair as separate processes. We report here that, using strong UV-A light from a laser, we were able to analyze separately the photoinactivation and repair of photosystem II in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Very strong UV-A light at 364 nm and a photon flux density of 2600 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1) inactivated the oxygen-evolving machinery and the photochemical reaction center of PSII within 1 or 2 min before the first step in the repair process, namely, the degradation of the D1 protein, occurred. During subsequent incubation of cells in weak visible light, the activity of PSII recovered fully within 30 min and this process depended on protein synthesis. During subsequent incubation of cells in darkness for 60 min, the D1 protein of the photoinactivated PSII was degraded. Further incubation in weak visible light resulted in the rapid restoration of the activity of PSII. These observations suggest that very strong UV-A light is a useful tool for the analysis of the repair of PSII after photoinactivation.     

Very strong UV-A light temporally separates the photoinhibition of photosystem II into light-induced inactivation and repair

When organisms that perform oxygenic photosynthesis are exposed to strong visible or UV light, inactivation of photosystem II (PSII) occurs. However, such organisms are able rapidly to repair the photoinactivated PSII. The phenomenon of photoinactivation and repair is known as photoinhibition. Under normal laboratory conditions, the rate of repair is similar to or faster than the rate of photoinactivation, preventing the detailed analysis of photoinactivation and repair as separate processes. We report here that, using strong UV-A light from a laser, we were able to analyze separately the photoinactivation and repair of photosystem II in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Very strong UV-A light at 364 nm and a photon flux density of 2600 μmol photons m⁻² s⁻¹ inactivated the oxygen-evolving machinery and the photochemical reaction center of PSII within 1 or 2 min before the first step in the repair process, namely, the degradation of the D1 protein, occurred. During subsequent incubation of cells in weak visible light, the activity of PSII recovered fully within 30 min and this process depended on protein synthesis. During subsequent incubation of cells in darkness for 60 min, the D1 protein of the photoinactivated PSII was degraded. Further incubation in weak visible light resulted in the rapid restoration of the activity of PSII. These observations suggest that very strong UV-A light is a useful tool for the analysis of the repair of PSII after photoinactivation.     

Characterization of processes responsible for the distinct effect of herbicides DCMU and BNT on Photosystem II photoinactivation in cells of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942

Light-induced modification of Photosystem II (PS II) complex was characterized in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 treated with either DCMU (a phenylurea PS II inhibitor) or BNT (a phenolic PS II inhibitor). The irradiance response of photoinactivation of PS II oxygen evolution indicated a BNT-specific photoinhibition that saturated at relatively low intensity of light. This BNT-specific process was slowed down under anaerobiosis, was accompanied by the oxygen-dependent formation of a 39 kDa D1 protein adduct, and was not related to stable Q_A reduction or the ADRY effect. In the BNT-treated cells, the light-induced, oxygen-independent initial drop of PS II electron flow was not affected by formate, an anion modifying properties of the PS II non-heme iron. For DCMU-treated cells, anaerobiosis did not significantly affect PS II photoinactivation, the D1 adduct was not observed and addition of formate induced similar initial decrease of PS II electron flow as in the BNT-treated cells. Our results indicate that reactive oxygen species (most likely singlet oxygen) and modification of the PS II acceptor side are responsible for the fast BNT-induced photoinactivation of PS II. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Target theory and the photoinactivation of Photosystem II

Application of target theory to the photoinactivation of Photosystem II in pea leaf discs (Park et al. 1995, 1996a,b) reveals that there is a critical light dosage below which there is complete photoprotection and above which there is photoinactivation (i.e a light-induced loss of oxygen flash yield). The critical dosage is about 3 mol photons m^–2 for medium and high light-grown leaves and 0.36 mol photons m^–2 for low light-grown leaves. Photoinactivation is a one-hit process with an effective cross-section of 0.045 m² mol^–1 photons which does not vary with growth irradiance, unlike the cross-section for oxygen evolution which increases with decreasing growth irradiance. The cross-section for oxygen evolution increased by about 20% following exposure to 6.8 mol photons m^–2 which may be due to energy transfer from photoinactivated units to functional Photosystem II units. We propose that the photoinactivation of PS II begins when a small group of PS II pigment molecules whose structure is uninfluenced by growth irradiance, becomes uncoupled energetically from the rest of the photosynthetic unit and thus no longer transfers excitions to P680. De-excitation of this group of pigment molecules provides the energy which leads to the damage of Photosystem II. Treatment of pea leaves with dithiothreitol, an inhibitor of the xanthophyll cycle, decreases the critical dosage i.e. decreases photoprotection but has no effect on the PS II photoinactivation cross-section. Treatment with 1 M nigericin increased the photoinactivation cross-section of PS II as did exposure to lincomycin which inhibits D1 protein synthesis and thus the repair of PS II reaction centres.Abbreviations DTT- dithiothreitol - PS II- Photosystem II - Fm- maximum fluorescence - Fv- variable fluorescence - LHCIIb- main light harvesting pigment-protein complex of PS II - D1 protein- psbA gene product - P680- reaction centre chlorophyll of Photosystem II - Qa- first quinone electron acceptor of Photosystem II - (o₂)- cross-section for oxygen evolution - (pi)- cross-section for photoinactivation     

Environmental stress inhibits the synthesis de novo of proteins involved in the photodamage-repair cycle of Photosystem II in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

The Photosystem II complex (PSII) is susceptible to inactivation by strong light, and the inactivation caused by strong light is referred to as photoinactivation or photoinhibition. In photosynthetic organisms, photoinactivated PSII is rapidly repaired and the extent of photoinactivation reflects the balance between the light-induced damage (photodamage) to PSII and the repair of PSII. In this study, we examined these two processes separately and quantitatively under stress conditions in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. The rate of photodamage was proportional to light intensity over a range of light intensities from 0 to 2000 μE m⁻² s⁻¹, and this relationship was not affected by environmental factors, such as salt stress, oxidative stress due to H₂O₂, and low temperature. The rate of repair also depended on light intensity. It was high under weak light and reached a maximum of 0.1 min⁻¹ at 300 μE m⁻² s⁻¹. By contrast to the rate of photodamage, the rate of repair was significantly reduced by the above-mentioned environmental factors. Pulse-labeling experiments with radiolabeled methionine revealed that these environmental factors inhibited the synthesis de novo of proteins. Such proteins included the D1 protein which plays an important role in the photodamage-repair cycle. These observations suggest that the repair of PSII under environmental stress might be the critical step that determines the outcome of the photodamage-repair cycle.     

Reduced levels of cytochrome b 6/f in transgenic tobacco increases the excitation pressure on Photosystem II without increasing sensitivity to photoinhibition in vivo

We have examined tobacco transformed with an antisense construct against the Rieske-FeS subunit of the cytochromeb ₆ f complex, containing only 15 to 20% of the wild-type level of cytochrome f. The anti-Rieske-FeS leaves had a comparable chlorophyll and Photosystem II reaction center stoichiometry and a comparable carotenoid profile to the wild-type, with differences of less than 10% on a leaf area basis. When exposed to high irradiance, the anti-Rieske-FeS leaves showed a greatly increased closure of Photosystem II and a much reduced capacity to develop non-photochemical quenching compared with wild-type. However, contrary to our expectations, the anti-Rieske-FeS leaves were not more susceptible to photoinhibition than were wild-type leaves. Further, when we regulated the irradiance so that the excitation pressure on photosystem II was equivalent in both the anti-Rieske-FeS and wild-type leaves, the anti-Rieske-FeS leaves experienced much less photoinhibition than wild-type. The evidence from the anti-Rieske-FeS tobacco suggests that rapid photoinactivation of Photosystem II in vivo only occurs when closure of Photosystem II coincides with lumen acidification. These results suggest that the model of photoinhibition in vivo occurring principally because of limitations to electron withdrawal from photosystem II does not explain photoinhibition in these transgenic tobacco leaves, and we need to re-evaluate the twinned concepts of photoinhibition and photoprotection.Abbreviations Chl chlorophyll - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-1,-dimethylurea - Fo and Fo minimal fluorescence when all PS II reaction centers are open in dark- and light-acclimated leaves, respectively - Fm and Fm maximal fluorescence when all PS II reaction centers are closed in dark- and light-acclimated leaves, respectively - Fv variable fluorescence (Fm-Fo) in dark acclimated leaves - Fv variable fluorescence (Fm-Fo) in lightacclimated leaves - NPQ non-photochemical quenching of fluorescence - PS I and PS II Photosystem I and II - P680 primary electron donor of the reaction center of PS II - PFD photosynthetic flux density - Q_A primary acceptor quinone of PS II - q_p photochemical quenching of fluorescence - V+A+Z violaxanthin+antheraxanthin+zeaxanthin     

Increased reliance upon photosystem II repair following acclimation to high-light by coral-dinoflagellate symbioses

Changing light environments force photoautotroph cells, including coral symbionts, to acclimate to maintain photosynthesis. Photosystem II (PSII) is subjected to photoinactivation at a rate proportional to the incident light, and cells must adjust their rates of protein repair to counter this photoinactivation. We examined PSII function in the coral symbiont Symbiodinium to determine the effect of photoacclimation on their capacity for PSII repair. Colonies of the coral Stylophora pistillata were collected from moderate light environments on the Lizard Island reef (Queensland, Australia) and transported to a local field station, where they were assigned to lower or higher light regimes and allowed to acclimate for 2 weeks. Following this photoacclimation period, the low-light acclimated corals showed greater symbiont density, higher chlorophyll per symbiont cell, and higher photosystem II protein than high-light acclimated corals did. Subsequently, we treated the corals with lincomycin, an inhibitor of chloroplastic protein synthesis, and exposed them to a high-light treatment to separate the effect of de novo protein synthesis in PSII repair from intrinsic susceptibility to photoinactivation. Low-light acclimated corals showed a sharp initial drop in PSII function but inhibition of PSII repair provoked only a modest additional drop in PSII function, compared to uninhibited corals. In high-light acclimated corals inhibition of PSII repair provoked a larger drop in PSII function, compared to uninhibited high-light corals. The greater lincomycin effects in the corals pre-acclimated to high-light show that high-light leads to an increased reliance on the PSII repair cycle.     

Towards a critical understanding of the photosystem II repair mechanism and its regulation during stress conditions

Photosystem II (PSII) is vulnerable to high light (HL) illumination resulting in photoinhibition. In addition to photoprotection mechanisms, plants have developed an efficient PSII repair mechanism to save themselves from irreversible damage to PSII under abiotic stresses including HL illumination. The phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cycle along with subsequent degradation of photodamaged D1 protein to be replaced by the insertion of a newly synthesized copy of D1 into the PSII complex, is the core function of the PSII repair cycle. The exact mechanism of this process is still under discussion. We describe the recent progress in identifying the kinases, phosphatases and proteases, and in understanding their involvement in the maintenance of thylakoid structure and the quality control of proteins by PSII repair cycle during photoinhibition.     

The fate of cytochrome b559during anaerobic photoinhibition and its recovery processes

The function of the cytochrome b₅₅₉, a Photosystem II (PS II) reaction center ubiquitous component is not yet known. Cytochrome b₅₅₉appears in a high (HP) or low (LP) potential form. The HP form is converted into the LP form during aerobic photoinhibition. It has been proposed before that this conversion, assumed to be reversible, ascribes protection against light stress of PS II by redirecting electron flow within PS II thus avoiding charge recombination of the primary radical pair and related oxidative damage. Here, we have used an experimental system allowing to assay the relation between the cytochrome b₅₅₉redox potential shift, its reversibility and protection against light induced PS II inactivation. Under anaerobic conditions fast reversible photoinactivation of PS II in isolated spinach thylakoids is observed accompanied by monomerisation of PS II. Monomers did not dissociate further into PS II sub-particles and did not migrate out of the grana partitions as observed in aerobic photoinactivation. The anaerobic photoinactivation is accompanied by an increase in the cytochrome b₅₅₉LP/HP ratio. However, despite recovery of PS II activity and partially of its dimeric form in darkness under aerobic conditions, no reversal of the cytochrome b₅₅₉redox potential shift accompanied these processes. Re-exposure of reactivated thylakoids having an increased PS II population in the LP form of the cytochrome b₅₅₉to strong illumination under aerobic conditions, did not result in a measurable protection of PS II as compared to control thylakoids. While it is possible that cytochrome b₅₅₉may play a protective role against light stress in PS II, the results presented here do not indicate that the increase in the ratio LP/HP form is involved in this process.     

Photoinhibition of Reaction Centers of Photosystems I and II in Intact Bryopsis Chloroplasts under Anaerobic Conditions

Illumination of intact Bryopsis corticulans chloroplasts under anaerobic conditions induced a decline of chlorophyll fluorescence and photoinhibition of Photosystems I and II. The time course of the light-induced decline of chlorophyll fluorescence and the decreases of activities of reactions sensitized by Photosystems I and II were compared. Photosystem I activity decreased in parallel with the disappearance of active P700. The time course of the destruction of the reaction center of Photosystem II was similar to that of photoinhibition of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol-Hill reaction.

It appears that the initial events in photoinhibition are the destruction of the reaction centers of Photosystems I and II and that the reaction centers that are inhibited become quenchers of chlorophyll fluorescence.

Effects of inhibitors of electron transfer and of an electron donor to Photosystem I showed that photoinhibition was related to Photosystem I activity.

     

Arctic <Emphasis Type="Italic">Micromonas</Emphasis> uses protein pools and non-photochemical quenching to cope with temperature restrictions on Photosystem II protein turnover

Micromonas strains of small prasinophyte green algae are found throughout the world’s oceans, exploiting widely different niches. We grew arctic and temperate strains of Micromonas and compared their susceptibilities to photoinactivation of Photosystem II, their counteracting Photosystem II repair capacities, their Photosystem II content, and their induction and relaxation of non-photochemical quenching. In the arctic strain Micromonas NCMA 2099, the cellular content of active Photosystem II represents only about 50 % of total Photosystem II protein, as a slow rate constant for clearance of PsbA protein limits instantaneous repair. In contrast, the temperate strain NCMA 1646 shows a faster clearance of PsbA protein which allows it to maintain active Photosystem II content equivalent to total Photosystem II protein. Under growth at 2 °C, the arctic Micromonas maintains a constitutive induction of xanthophyll deepoxidation, shown by second-derivative whole-cell spectra, which supports strong induction of non-photochemical quenching under low to moderate light, even if xanthophyll cycling is blocked. This non-photochemical quenching, however, relaxes during subsequent darkness with kinetics nearly comparable to the temperate Micromonas NCMA 1646, thereby limiting the opportunity cost of sustained downregulation of PSII function after a decrease in light.     

Sub‐cellular location of FtsH proteases in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 suggests localised PSII repair zones in the thylakoid membranes

In cyanobacteria and chloroplasts, exposure to HL damages the photosynthetic apparatus, especially the D1 subunit of Photosystem II. To avoid chronic photoinhibition, a PSII repair cycle operates to replace damaged PSII subunits with newly synthesised versions. To determine the sub‐cellular location of this process, we examined the localisation of FtsH metalloproteases, some of which are directly involved in degrading damaged D1. We generated transformants of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 expressing GFP‐tagged versions of its four FtsH proteases. The ftsH2–gfp strain was functional for PSII repair under our conditions. Confocal microscopy shows that FtsH1 is mainly in the cytoplasmic membrane, while the remaining FtsH proteins are in patches either in the thylakoid or at the interface between the thylakoid and cytoplasmic membranes. HL exposure which increases the activity of the Photosystem II repair cycle led to no detectable changes in FtsH distribution, with the FtsH2 protease involved in D1 degradation retaining its patchy distribution in the thylakoid membrane. We discuss the possibility that the FtsH2–GFP patches represent Photosystem II ‘repair zones’ within the thylakoid membranes, and the possible advantages of such functionally specialised membrane zones. Anti‐GFP affinity pull‐downs provide the first indication of the composition of the putative repair zones.     

Photosystem II in a mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii lacking the 23 kDa psbP protein shows increased sensitivity to photoinhibition in the absence of chloride

The psbP gene product, the so called 23 kDa extrinsic protein, is involved in water oxidation carried out by Photosystem II. However, the protein is not absolutely required for water oxidation. Here we have studied Photosystem II mediated electron transfer in a mutant of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the FUD 39 mutant, that lacks the psbP protein. When grown in dim light the Photosystem II content in thylakoid membranes of FUD 39 is approximately similar to that in the wild-type. The oxygen evolution is dependent on the presence of chloride as a cofactor, which activates the water oxidation with a dissociation constant of about 4 mM. In the mutant, the oxygen evolution is very sensitive to photoinhibition when assayed at low chloride concentrations while chloride protects against photoinhibition with a dissociation constant of about 5 mM. The photoinhibition is irreversible as oxygen evolution cannot be restored by the addition of chloride to inhibited samples. In addition the inhibition seems to be targeted primarily to the Mn-cluster in Photosystem II as the electron transfer through the remaining part of Photosystem II is photoinhibited with slower kinetics. Thus, this mutant provides an experimental system in which effects of photoinhibition induced by lesions at the donor side of Photosystem II can be studied in vivo.Abbreviations Chl chlorophyll - DCIP 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol - DPC 2,2-diphenylcarbonic dihydrazide - HEPES 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinethanesulfonic acid - P₆₈₀ the primary electron donor to PS II - PpBQ phenyl-p-benzoquinone - PS II Photosystem II - Q_A the first quinone acceptor of PS II - Q_B the second quinone acceptor of PS II - SDS sodium dodecyl sulfate - Tris tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane - Tyr_D accessory electron donor on the D₂-protein - Tyr_Z tyrosine residue, acting as electron carrier between P₆₈₀ and the water oxidizing system     

Operation of dual mechanisms that both lead to photoinactivation of Photosystem II in leaves by visible light

Photosystem II (PS II) is photoinactivated during photosynthesis, requiring repair to maintain full function during the day. What is the mechanism(s) of the initial events that lead to photoinactivation of PS II? Two hypotheses have been put forward. The 'excess-energy hypothesis' states that excess energy absorbed by chlorophyll (Chl), neither utilized in photosynthesis nor dissipated harmlessly in non-photochemical quenching, leads to PS II photoinactivation; the 'Mn hypothesis' (also termed the two-step hypothesis) states that light absorption by the Mn cluster in PS II is the primary effect that leads to dissociation of Mn, followed by damage to the reaction centre by light absorption by Chl. Observations from various studies support one or the other hypothesis, but each hypothesis alone cannot explain all the observations. We propose that both mechanisms operate in the leaf, with the relative contribution from each mechanism depending on growth conditions or plant species. Indeed, in a single system, namely, the interior of a leaf, we could observe one or the other mechanism at work, depending on the location within the tissue. There is no reason to expect the two mechanisms to be mutually exclusive.     

Photosystem II photoinhibition-repair cycle protects Photosystem I from irreversible damage

Photodamage of Photosystem II (PSII) has been considered as an unavoidable and harmful reaction that decreases plant productivity. PSII, however, has an efficient and dynamically regulated repair machinery, and the PSII activity becomes inhibited only when the rate of damage exceeds the rate of repair. The speed of repair is strictly regulated according to the energetic state in the chloroplast. In contrast to PSII, Photosystem I (PSI) is very rarely damaged, but when occurring, the damage is practically irreversible. While PSII damage is linearly dependent on light intensity, PSI gets damaged only when electron flow from PSII exceeds the capacity of PSI electron acceptors to cope with the electrons. When electron flow to PSI is limited, for example in the presence of DCMU, PSI is extremely tolerant against light stress. Proton gradient (ΔpH)-dependent slow-down of electron transfer from PSII to PSI, involving the PGR5 protein and the Cyt b6f complex, protects PSI from excess electrons upon sudden increase in light intensity. Here we provide evidence that in addition to the ΔpH-dependent control of electron transfer, the controlled photoinhibition of PSII is also able to protect PSI from permanent photodamage. We propose that regulation of PSII photoinhibition is the ultimate regulator of the photosynthetic electron transfer chain and provides a photoprotection mechanism against formation of reactive oxygen species and photodamage in PSI.     

Revised scheme for the mechanism of photoinhibition and its application to enhance the abiotic stress tolerance of the photosynthetic machinery

When photosynthetic organisms are exposed to abiotic stress, their photosynthetic activity is significantly depressed. In particular, photosystem II (PSII) in the photosynthetic machinery is readily inactivated under strong light and this phenomenon is referred to as photoinhibition of PSII. Other types of abiotic stress act synergistically with light stress to accelerate photoinhibition. Recent studies of photoinhibition have revealed that light stress damages PSII directly, whereas other abiotic stresses act exclusively to inhibit the repair of PSII after light-induced damage (photodamage). Such inhibition of repair is associated with suppression, by reactive oxygen species (ROS), of the synthesis of proteins de novo and, in particular, of the D1 protein, and also with the reduced efficiency of repair under stress conditions. Gene-technological improvements in the tolerance of photosynthetic organisms to various abiotic stresses have been achieved via protection of the repair system from ROS and, also, by enhancing the efficiency of repair via facilitation of the turnover of the D1 protein in PSII. In this review, we summarize the current status of research on photoinhibition as it relates to the effects of abiotic stress and we discuss successful strategies that enhance the activity of the repair machinery. In addition, we propose several potential methods for activating the repair system by gene-technological methods.     

Photosystem II reaction centres stay intact during low temperature photoinhibition

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis was studied in intact barley leaves at 5 and 20°C, to reveal if Photosystem II becomes predisposed to photoinhibition at low temperature by 1) creation of excessive excitation of Photosystem II or, 2) inhibition of the repair process of Photosystem II. The light and temperature dependence of the reduction state of Q_A was measured by modulated fluorescence. Photon flux densities giving 60% of Q_A in a reduced state at steady-state photosynthesis (300 mol m^–2s^–1 at 5°C and 1200 mol m^–2s^–1 at 20°C) resulted in a depression of the photochemical efficiency of Photosystem II (F_v/F_m) at both 5 and 20°C. Inhibition of F_v/F_m occurred with initially similar kinetics at the two temperatures. After 6h, F_v/F_m was inhibited by 30% and had reached steady-state at 20°C. However, at 5°C, F_v/F_m continued to decrease and after 10h, F_v/F_m was depressed to 55% of control. The light response of the reduction state of Q_A did not change during photoinhibition at 20°C, whereas after photoinhibition at 5°C, the proportion of closed reaction centres at a given photon flux density was 10–20% lower than before photoinhibition.Changes in the D1-content were measured by immunoblotting and by the atrazine binding capacity during photoinhibition at high and low temperatures, with and without the addition of chloramphenicol to block chloroplast encoded protein synthesis. At 20°C, there was a close correlation between the amount of D1-protein and the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, both in the presence or in the absence of an active repair cycle. At 5°C, an accumulation of inactive reaction centres occurred, since the photochemical efficiency of Photosystem II was much more depressed than the loss of D1-protein. Furthermore, at 5°C the repair cycle was largely inhibited as concluded from the finding that blockage of chloroplast encoded protein synthesis did not enhance the susceptibility to photoinhibition at 5°C.It is concluded that, the kinetics of the initial decrease of F_v/F_m was determined by the reduction state of the primary electron acceptor Q_A, at both temperatures. However, the further suppression of F_v/F_m at 5°C after several hours of photoinhibition implies that the inhibited repair cycle started to have an effect in determining the photochemical efficiency of Photosystem II.Abbreviations CAP D-threochloramphenicol - F₀ and F ₀ fluorescence when all Photosystem II reaction centres are open in dark- and light-acclimated leaves, respectively - F_m and F _m fluorescence when all Photosystem II reaction centres are closed in dark- and light-acclimated leaves, respectively - F_s fluorescence at steady state - Q_A the primary, stable quinone acceptor of Photosystem II - q_N non-photochemical quenching of fluorescence - q_P photochemical quenching of fluorescence     

Unifying model for the photoinactivation of Photosystem II in vivo under steady-state photosynthesis

We present a unifying mechanism for photoinhibition based on current obsevations from in vivo studies rather than from in vitro studies with isolated thylakoids or PS II membranes. In vitro studies have limited relevance for in vivo photoinhibition because very high light is used with photon exposures rarely encountered in nature, and most of the multiple, interacting, protective strategies of PS II regulation in living cells are not functional. It is now established that the photoinactivation of Photosystem II in vivo is a probability and light-dosage event which depends on the photons absorbed and not the irradiance per se. As the reciprocity law is obeyed and target theory analysis strongly suggests that only one photon is required, we propose that a single dominant molecular mechanism occurs in vivo with one photon inactivating PS II under limiting, saturating or sustained high light. Two mechanisms have been proposed for photoinhibition under high light, acceptor-side and donor-side photoinhibition [see Aro et al. (1994) Biochim Biophys Acta 1143: 113–134], and another mechanism for very low light, the low-light syndrome [Keren et al. (1995) J Biol Chem 270: 806–814]. Based on the exciton-radical pair equilibrium model of exciton dynamics, we propose a unifying mechanism for the photoinactivation of PS II in vivo under steady-state photosynthesis that depends on the generation and maintenance of increased concentrations of the primary radical pair, P680⁺Pheo_–, and the different ways charge recombination is regulated under varying environmental conditions [Anderson et al. (1997) Physiol Plant 100: 214–223]. We suggest that the primary cause of damage to D1 protein is P680⁺, rather than singlet O₂ formed from triplet P680, or other reactive oxygen species.