Domain III of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus is essential for induction of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Two elongation factors (EF) EF-Tu and EF-G participate in the elongation phase during protein biosynthesis on the ribosome. Their functional cycles depend on GTP binding and its hydrolysis. The EF-Tu complexed with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA delivers tRNA to the ribosome, whereas EF-G stimulates translocation, a process in which tRNA and mRNA movements occur in the ribosome. In the present paper we report that: (a) intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is influenced by excision of its domain III; (b) the EF-G lacking domain III has a 10(3)-fold decreased GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas its affinity for GTP is slightly decreased; and (c) the truncated EF-G does not stimulate translocation despite the physical presence of domain IV, which is also very important for translocation. By contrast, the interactions of the truncated factor with GDP and fusidic acid-dependent binding of EF-G.GDP complex to the ribosome are not influenced. These findings indicate an essential contribution of domain III to activation of GTP hydrolysis. These results also suggest conformational changes of the EF-G molecule in the course of its interaction with the ribosome that might be induced by GTP binding and hydrolysis.     

Distinct functional classes of ram mutations in 16S rRNA

During decoding, the ribosome selects the correct (cognate) aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) from a large pool of incorrect aa-tRNAs through a two-stage mechanism. In the initial selection stage, aa-tRNA is delivered to the ribosome as part of a ternary complex with elongation factor EF-Tu and GTP. Interactions between codon and anticodon lead to activation of the GTPase domain of EF-Tu and GTP hydrolysis. Then, in the proofreading stage, aa-tRNA is released from EF-Tu and either moves fully into the A/A site (a step termed “accommodation”) or dissociates from the ribosome. Cognate codon-anticodon pairing not only stabilizes aa-tRNA at both stages of decoding but also stimulates GTP hydrolysis and accommodation, allowing the process to be both accurate and fast. In previous work, we isolated a number of ribosomal ambiguity (ram) mutations in 16S rRNA, implicating particular regions of the ribosome in the mechanism of decoding. Here, we analyze a representative subset of these mutations with respect to initial selection, proofreading, RF2-dependent termination, and overall miscoding in various contexts. We find that mutations that disrupt inter-subunit bridge B8 increase miscoding in a general way, causing defects in both initial selection and proofreading. Mutations in or near the A site behave differently, increasing miscoding in a codon-anticodon-dependent manner. These latter mutations may create spurious favorable interactions in the A site for certain near-cognate aa-tRNAs, providing an explanation for their context-dependent phenotypes in the cell.     

GTPases mechanisms and functions of translation factors on the ribosome

The elongation factors (EF) Tu and G and initiation factor 2 (IF2) from bacteria are multidomain GTPases with essential functions in the elongation and initiation phases of translation. They bind to the same site on the ribosome where their low intrinsic GTPase activities are strongly stimulated. The factors differ fundamentally from each other, and from the majority of GTPases, in the mechanisms of GTPase control, the timing of Pi release, and the functional role of GTP hydrolysis. EF-Tu x GTP forms a ternary complex with aminoacyl-tRNA, which binds to the ribosome. Only when a matching codon is recognized, the GTPase of EF-Tu is stimulated, rapid GTP hydrolysis and Pi release take place, EF-Tu rearranges to the GDP form, and aminoacyl-tRNA is released into the peptidyltransferase center. In contrast, EF-G hydrolyzes GTP immediately upon binding to the ribosome, stimulated by ribosomal protein L7/12. Subsequent translocation is driven by the slow dissociation of Pi, suggesting a mechano-chemical function of EF-G. Accordingly, different conformations of EF-G on the ribosome are revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is triggered upon formation of the 70S initiation complex, and the dissociation of Pi and/or IF2 follows a rearrangement of the ribosome into the elongation-competent state.     

Unique antibiotic sensitivity of archaebacterial polypeptide elongation factors.

The antibiotic sensitivity of the archaebacterial factors catalyzing the binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to ribosomes (elongation factor Tu [EF-Tu] for eubacteria and elongation factor 1 [EF1] for eucaryotes) and the translocation of peptidyl-tRNA (elongation factor G [EF-G] for eubacteria and elongation factor 2 [EF2] for eucaryotes) was investigated by using two EF-Tu and EF1 [EF-Tu(EF1)]-targeted drugs, kirromycin and pulvomycin, and the EF-G and EF2 [EF-G(EF2)]-targeted drug fusidic acid. The interaction of the inhibitors with the target factors was monitored by using polyphenylalanine-synthesizing cell-free systems. A survey of methanogenic, halophilic, and sulfur-dependent archaebacteria showed that elongation factors of organisms belonging to the methanogenic-halophilic and sulfur-dependent branches of the "third kingdom" exhibit different antibiotic sensitivity spectra. Namely, the methanobacterial-halobacterial EF-Tu(EF1)-equivalent protein was found to be sensitive to pulvomycin but insensitive to kirromycin, whereas the methanobacterial-halobacterial EF-G(EF2)-equivalent protein was found to be sensitive to fusidic acid. By contrast, sulfur-dependent thermophiles were unaffected by all three antibiotics, with two exceptions; Thermococcus celer, whose EF-Tu(EF1)-equivalent factor was blocked by pulvomycin, and Thermoproteus tenax, whose EF-G(EF2)-equivalent factor was sensitive to fusidic acid. On the whole, the results revealed a remarkable intralineage heterogeneity of elongation factors not encountered within each of the two reference (eubacterial and eucaryotic) kingdoms.     

Molecular dynamics of ribosomal elongation factors G and Tu

Translation on the ribosome is controlled by external factors. During polypeptide lengthening, elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G consecutively interact with the bacterial ribosome. EF-Tu binds and delivers an aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A site and EF-G helps translocate the tRNAs between their binding sites after the peptide bond is formed. These processes occur at the expense of GTP. EF-Tu:tRNA and EF-G are of similar shape, share a common binding site, and undergo large conformational changes on interaction with the ribosome. To characterize the internal motion of these two elongation factors, we used 25 ns long all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. We observed enhanced mobility of EF-G domains III, IV, and V and of tRNA in the EF-Tu:tRNA complex. EF-Tu:GDP complex acquired a configuration different from that found in the crystal structure of EF-Tu with a GTP analogue, showing conformational changes in the switch I and II regions. The calculated electrostatic properties of elongation factors showed no global similarity even though matching electrostatic surface patches were found around the domain I that contacts the ribosome, and in the GDP/GTP binding region.     

Binding Interaction between Tet(M) and the Ribosome: Requirements for Binding

Tet(M) protein interacts with the protein biosynthesis machinery to render this process resistant to tetracycline by a mechanism which involves release of the antibiotic from the ribosome in a reaction dependent on GTP hydrolysis. To clarify this resistance mechanism further, the interaction of Tet(M) with the ribosome has been examined by using a gel filtration assay with radioactively labelled Tet(M) protein. The presence of GTP and 5′-guanylyl imido diphosphate, but not GDP, promoted Tet(M)-ribosome complex formation. Furthermore, thiostrepton, which inhibits the activities of elongation factor G (EF-G) and EF-Tu by binding to the ribosome, blocks stable Tet(M)-ribosome complex formation. Direct competition experiments show that Tet(M) and EF-G bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome.     

Structural homology between elongation factors EF-Tu from Bacillus stearothermophilus and Escherichia coli in the binding site for aminoacyl-tRNA

Elongation factor EF-Tu (Mr approximately equal to 50 000) and elongation factor EF-G (Mr approximately equal to 78 000) were isolated from Bacillus stearothermophilus in a homogeneous form. The ability of EF-Tu to participate in protein synthesis is rapidly inactivated by N-tosyl-L-phenyl-alanylchloromethane (Tos-PheCH2Cl). EF-Tu X GTP is more susceptible to the inhibition by Tos-PheCH2Cl than is EF-Tu X GDP. Tos-PheCH2Cl forms a covalent equimolar complex with the factor by reacting with a cysteine residue in its molecule. The labelling of EF-Tu by the reagent irreversibly destroys its ability to bind aminoacyl-tRNA, which in turn protects the protein from this inactivation. This indicates that the modification of EF-Tu by Tos-PheCH2Cl occurs at the aminoacyl-tRNA binding site of the protein. To identify and characterize the site of aminoacyl-tRNA binding in EF-Tu, the factor was labelled with [14C]Tos-PheCH2Cl, digested with trypsin, the resulting peptides were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography and the sequence of the radioactive peptide was determined. The peptide has identical structure with an Escherichia coli EF-Tu tryptic peptide comprising the residues 75-89 and the Tos-PheCH2Cl-reactive cysteine at position 81 [Jonák, J., Petersen, T. E., Clark, B. F. C. and Rychlík, I. (1982) FEBS Lett. 150, 485-488]. Experiments on photo-oxidation of EF-Tu by visible light in the presence of rose bengal dye showed that there are apparently two histidine residues in elongation factor Tu from B. stearothermophilus which are essential for the interaction with aminoacyl-tRNA. This is clearly reminiscent of a similar situation in E. coli EF-Tu [Jonák, J., Petersen, T. E., Meloun, B. and Rychlík, I. (1984) Eur. J. Biochem. 144, 295-303]. Our results provide further evidence for the conserved nature of the site of aminoacyl-tRNA binding in elongation factor EF-Tu and show that Tos-PheCH2Cl reagent might be a favourable tool for the identification of the site in the structure of prokaryotic EF-Tus.     

The elongation factor Tu binds aminoacyl-tRNA in the presence of GDP

Escherichia coli elongation factor (EF-Tu) binds aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNA) not only in the presence of GTP but also in the presence of GDP. Complex formation leads to a protection of the aa-tRNA against nonenzymatic deacylation and digestion by pancreatic ribonuclease, as well as to a protection of EF-Tu against proteolysis by trypsin. The equilibrium constant for the binding of Phe-tRNAPheyeast for example to EF-Tu.GDP has been determined to be 0.7 X 10(5) M-1 which is 2 orders of magnitude lower than the equilibrium constant for Phe-tRNAPheyeast binding to EF-Tu.GTP. In the presence of kirromycin, aminoacyl-tRNA binding to EF-Tu.GDP is not affected as much: Phe-tRNAPheyeast is bound with an equilibrium constant of 3 X 10(5) M-1. While there is also a measurable interaction between EF-Tu.GTP and tRNA, such an interaction cannot be detected with EF-Tu.GDP and tRNA, not even at millimolar concentrations. A so far undetected complex formation between aminoacyl-tRNA and EF-Tu.GTP in the presence of pulvomycin, however, could be detected. The results are discussed in terms of the structural requirements of ternary complex formation and in the light of proofreading schemes involving A-site binding on the E. coli ribosome.     

Possible evolution of factors involved in protein biosynthesis.

The elongation factors of protein biosynthesis are well preserved through out evolution. They catalyze the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis, where on the ribosome amino acids are added one at a time to a growing peptide according to the genetic information transcribed into mRNA. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) provides the binding of aminoacylated tRNA to the ribosome and protects the aminoester bond against hydrolysis until a correct match between the codon on mRNA and the anticodon on tRNA can be achieved. Elongation factor G (EF-G) supports the translocation of tRNAs and of mRNA on the ribosome so that a new codon can be exposed for decoding. Both these factors are GTP binding proteins, and as such exist in an active form with GTP and an inactive form with GDP bound to the nucleotide binding domain. Elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) will catalyze the exchange of nucleotide on EF-Tu. This review describes structural work on EF-Tu performed in our laboratory over the last eight years. The structural results provide a rather complete picture of the major structural forms of EF-Tu, including the so called ternary complex of aa-tRNA:EF-Tu:GTP. The structural comparison of this ternary complex with the structure of EF-G:GDP displays an unexpected macromolecular mimicry, where three domains of EF-G mimick the shape of the tRNA in the ternary complex. This observation has initiated much speculation on the evolution of all factors involved in protein synthesis, as well as on the details of the ribosomal function in one part of elongation.     

Elongation factor-dependent affinity labeling of Escherichia coli ribosomes

Elongation factor-dependent affinity labeling of Escherichia coli ribosomes was obtained using a functional analogue of aminoacyl-tRNA. Since elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) screens both the modified aminoacyl-tRNAs and the ribosomal complexes for active particles, only functional macromolecular complexes are examined. This approach also provides an unequivocal identification of the transfer RNA binding site from which affinity labeling occurs. N^ε-bromoacetyl-Lys-tRNA was prepared by covalently attaching an electrophilic group to the side-chain of the amino acid. This chemical modification did not interfere with function, since the ?BrAcLys-tRNA participated successfully in EF-Tu and poly(rA)-dependent binding to ribosomes, peptide bond formation, and elongation factor G (EF-G)-mediated translocation. Affinity labeling of ribosomal RNA was observed only in those incubations which contained both EF-Tu and EF-G. The crosslinking of ?BrAcLys-tRNA to 23 S rRNA was found even if fusidic acid was added to the incubation before EF-G. The dependence of the covalent reaction on EF-G demonstrates, unambiguously, that a reactive residue of 23 S rRNA is located adjacent to the 3′ end of the functionally defined P site. Similarly, the affinity labeling of proteins L13/14/15, L2, L32/33, and L24 required EF-G-dependent translocation of ?BrAcLys-tRNA into the P site. Protein L27 was alkylated following the EF-Tu-dependent binding of ?BrAcLys-tRNA to the ribosome, and the extent of affinity labeling was stimulated by the addition of EF-G to the incubation. Double-label dipeptide experiments confirmed that affinity labeling occurred from functional tRNA binding sites by demonstrating that the same ?BrAcLys-tRNA which reacted covalently with 23 S rRNA or a ribosomal protein could also participate in peptide bond formation. Finally, the ribosome affinity labeling obtained with ?BrAcLys-tRNA · EF-Tu · guanylylimidodiphosphate differed little from that obtained with ?BrAcLys-tRNA · EF-Tu · GTP. This work constitutes the first direct examination of the aminoacyl ends of the EF-Tu-dependent conformational states of the ribosomal complex, and demonstrates the potential value of functional Lys-tRNA analogues with different probes attached to the lysine side-chain.     

The elongation factor Tu.kirromycin complex has two binding sites for tRNA molecules

The interaction of the polypeptide chain elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) with the antibiotic kirromycin and tRNA has been studied by measuring the extent of protein modification with N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethylketone (TPCK) and N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). Kirromycin protects both EF-Tu.GDP and EF-Tu.GTP against modification with TPCK. Binding of aminoacyl-tRNA added at increasing concentrations to a solution of 40 microM EF-Tu.GDP.kirromycin complex re-exposes the TPCK target site on the protein. However, when the aminoacyl-tRNA concentration is raised beyond 20 microM, TPCK labeling drops again and is blocked completely at approximately 300 microM aminoacyl-tRNA. By contrast, addition of uncharged tRNA or N- acetylaminoacyl -tRNA enhances TPCK labeling of the protein over the entire tRNA concentration range studied. These data strongly suggest that kirromycin induces in EF-Tu.GDP an additional tRNA binding site that can bind uncharged tRNA, aminoacyl-tRNA, and N- acetylaminoacyl -tRNA. Support for this assumption is provided by measuring the modification of EF-Tu.GDP with the sulfhydryl reagent NEM. Moreover, NEM modification also indicates an additional tRNA binding site on EF-Tu.GTP.kirromycin, which could not be detected with TPCK. Mapping of the tryptic peptides of EF-Tu.GDP labeled with [14C]TPCK revealed only one target site for this agent, i.e., cysteine-81. Modification occurred at the same site in the presence and in the absence of kirromycin and uncharged tRNA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The antibiotics kirromycin and pulvomycin bind to different sites on the elongation factor Tu from Escherichia coli

Pulvomycin and kirromycin, two antibiotics which inhibit protein biosynthesis in Escherichia coli by complex formation with the elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), bind to different sites on the protein. While only one molecule of kirromycin can be bound to one molecule of EF-Tu, more than one molecule of pulvomycin interacts with a molecule of EF-Tu. This has been deduced from experiments in which the aminoacyl-tRNA binding and the GTPase activity of EF-Tu were measured in the presence of varying amounts of both antibiotics. These experiments are interpreted to mean that pulvomycin but not kirromycin can replace the other antibiotic in its respective site. Our conclusions are supported by circular dichroism spectroscopy.     

Single-molecule fluorescence measurements of ribosomal translocation dynamics

We employ single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to study structural dynamics over the first two elongation cycles of protein synthesis, using ribosomes containing either Cy3-labeled ribosomal protein L11 and A- or P-site Cy5-labeled tRNA or Cy3- and Cy5-labeled tRNAs. Pretranslocation (PRE) complexes demonstrate fluctuations between classical and hybrid forms, with concerted motions of tRNAs away from L11 and from each other when classical complex converts to hybrid complex. EF-G?GTP binding to both hybrid and classical PRE complexes halts these fluctuations prior to catalyzing translocation to form the posttranslocation (POST) complex. EF-G dependent translocation from the classical PRE complex proceeds via transient formation of a short-lived hybrid intermediate. A-site binding of either EF-G to the PRE complex or of aminoacyl-tRNA?EF-Tu ternary complex to the POST complex markedly suppresses ribosome conformational lability.     

Elongation factor G with effector loop from elongation factor Tu is inactive in translocation

Elongation factors Tu and G (EF-Tu and EF-G) alternately interact with the ribosome during the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis. The function of both factors depends on GTP binding, and the factors are ascribed to a superfamily of G-proteins. All G-proteins contain the effector loop, a structural element that is important for the protein's interaction with its target molecule. In this study the effector loop of EF-G was replaced by the loop taken from EF-Tu. The EF-G with EF-Tu loop has markedly decreased GTPase activity and did not catalyze translocation. We conclude that these loops are not functionally interchangeable since the factors interact with different states of the ribosome.     

The reaction of ribosomes with elongation factor Tu.GTP complexes. Aminoacyl-tRNA-independent reactions in the elongation cycle determine the accuracy of protein synthesis

The fidelity of protein synthesis depends on the rate constants for the reaction of ribosomes with ternary complexes of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), GTP, and aminoacyl (aa)-tRNA. By measuring the rate constants for the reaction of poly(U)-programmed ribosomes with a binary complex of elongation factor (EF-Tu) and GTP we have shown that two of the key rate constants in the former reaction are determined exclusively by ribosome-EF-Tu interactions and are not affected by the aa-tRNA. These are the rate constant for GTP hydrolysis, which plays an important role in the fidelity of ternary complex selection by the ribosome, and the rate constant for EF-Tu.GDP dissociation from the ribosome, which plays an equally important role in subsequent proofreading of the aa-tRNA. We conclude that the fidelities of ternary complex selection and proofreading are fundamentally dependent on ribosome-EF-Tu interactions. These interactions determine the absolute value of the rate constants for GTP hydrolysis and EF-Tu.GDP dissociation. The ribosome then uses these rate constants as internal standards to measure, respectively, the rate constants for ternary complex and aa-tRNA dissociation from the ribosome. These rates, in turn, are highly dependent on whether the ternary complex and aa-tRNA are cognate or near-cognate to the codon being translated.     

Requirements for in vitro reconstruction of protein synthesis

Translation of f2am3 RNA and MS2 RNA in a system containing purified ribosomes and precharged aminoacyl-tRNA, does not occur in the presence of the "known" initiation (IF-1, IF-2 and IF-3), elongation (EF-Tu, EF-Ts and EF-G) and termination (RF-1, RF-2) factors. Translation in this system requires at least three additional protein factors. These are EF-P and the rescue protein as well as a previously undescribed factor we call W, which is found in the high-salt ribosomal eluate.     

Structure and Functions of the Prokaryotic Elongation Factor G

Structural and functional data on elongation factor G (EF-G) are reviewed with regard to nucleotide exchange, GTP hydrolysis, mechanism of action of fusidic acid, and functional roles of the EF-G structural domains in translocation. Biochemical data are correlated with structural dynamics of the EF-G molecule on interaction with various ligands. Data on EF-Tu are also considered, as EF-G and EF-Tu share certain structural and functional features.     

GTPases of the Translation Apparatus

Protein biosynthesis is a complex biochemical process involving a number of stages at which different translation factors specifically interact with ribosome. Some of these factors belong to GTP-binding proteins, or G-proteins. Due to their functioning, GTP is hydrolyzed to yield GDP and the inorganic phosphate ion P_i. Interaction with ribosome enhances GTPase activity of translation factors; i.e., ribosome plays a role of GTPase-activating protein (GAP). GTPases involved in translation interact with ribosome at every stage of protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 (IF2) catalyzes initiator tRNA binding to the ribosome P site and subsequent binding of the 50S subunit to the initiation complex of the 30S subunit. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) controls aminoacyl-tRNA delivery to the ribosome A site, while elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex by one codon on the ribosome. Release factor 3 (RF3) catalyzes the release of termination factors 1 or 2 (RF1 or RF2) from the ribosomal complex after completion of protein synthesis and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. The functional properties of translational GTPases as related to other G-proteins, the putative mechanism of GTP hydrolysis, structural features, and the functional cycles of translational GTPases are considered.     

Structure and functions of the prokaryotic elongation factor G

Structural and functional data on elongation factor G (EF-G) are reviewed with regard to nucleotide exchange, GTP hydrolysis, mechanism of action of fusidic acid, and functional roles of the EF-G structural domains in translocation. Biochemical data are correlated with structural dynamics of the EF-G molecule on interaction with various ligands. Data on EF-Tu are also considered, as EF-G and EF-Tu share certain structural and functional features.