CHOBIMALT: a cholesterol-based detergent

Cholesterol and its hemisuccinate and sulfate derivatives are widely used in studies of purified membrane proteins but are difficult to solubilize in aqueous solution, even in the presence of detergent micelles. Other cholesterol derivatives do not form conventional micelles and lead to viscous solutions. To address these problems, a cholesterol-based detergent, CHOBIMALT, has been synthesized and characterized. At concentrations above 3?4 μM, CHOBIMALT forms micelles without the need for elevated temperatures or sonic disruption. Diffusion and fluorescence measurements indicated that CHOBIMALT micelles are large (210±30 kDa). The ability to solubilize a functional membrane protein was explored using a G-protein coupled receptor, the human kappa opioid receptor type 1 (hKOR1). While CHOBIMALT alone was not found to be effective as a surfactant for membrane extraction, when added to classical detergent micelles CHOBIMALT was observed to dramatically enhance the thermal stability of solubilized hKOR1.     

Protein-surfactant interactions: a tale of many states

The scientific study of protein surfactant interactions goes back more than a century, and has been put to practical uses in everything from the estimation of protein molecular weights to efficient washing powder enzymes and products for personal hygiene. After a burst of activity in the late 1960s and early 1970s that established the general principles of how charged surfactants bind to and denature proteins, the field has kept a relatively low profile until the last decade. Within this period there has been a maturation of techniques for more accurate and sophisticated analyses of protein-surfactant complexes such as calorimetry and small angle scattering techniques. In this review I provide an overview of different useful approaches to study these complexes and identify eight different issues which define central concepts in the field. (1) Are proteins denatured by monomeric surfactant molecules, micelles or both? (2) How does unfolding of proteins in surfactant compare with "proper" unfolding in chemical denaturants? Recent work has highlighted the role of shared micelles, rather than monomers, below the critical micelle concentration (cmc) in promoting both protein denaturation and formation of higher order structures. Kinetic studies have extended the experimentally accessible range of surfactant concentrations to far above the cmc, revealing numerous different modes of denaturation by ionic surfactants below and above the cmc which reflect micellar properties as much as protein unfolding pathways. Uncharged surfactants follow a completely different denaturation strategy involving synergy between monomers and micelles. The high affinity of charged surfactants for proteins means that unfolding pathways are generally different in surfactants versus chemical denaturants, although there are common traits. Other issues are as follows: (3) Are there non-denaturing roles for SDS? (4) How reversible is unfolding in SDS? (5) How do solvent conditions affect the way in which surfactants denature proteins? The last three issues compare SDS with "proper" membranes. (6) Do anionic surfactants such as SDS mimic biological membranes? (7) How do mixed micelles interact with globular proteins? (8) How can mixed micelles be used to measure the stability of membrane proteins? The growing efforts to understand the unique features of membrane proteins have encouraged the development of mixed micelles to study the equilibria and kinetics of this class of proteins, and traits which unite globular and membrane proteins have also emerged. These issues emphasise the amazing power of surfactants to both extend the protein conformational landscape and at the same time provide convenient and reversible short-cuts between the native and denatured state for otherwise obdurate membrane proteins.     

Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis and trafficking by Rab GTPases

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins that, in response to activation by extracellular stimuli, regulate intracellular second messenger levels via their coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins. GPCR activation also initiates a series of molecular events that leads to G protein-coupled receptor kinase-mediated receptor phosphorylation and the binding of beta-arrestin proteins to the intracellular face of the receptor. beta-Arrestin binding not only contributes to the G protein-uncoupling of GPCRs, but also mediates the targeting of many GPCRs for endocytosis in clathrin-coated pits. Several GPCRs internalize as a stable complex with beta-arrestin and the stability of this complex appears to regulate, at least in part, whether the receptors are dephosphorylated in early endosomes and recycled back to the cell surface as fully functional receptors, retained in early endosomes or targeted for degradation in lysosomes. More recently, it has become appreciated that the movement of GPCRs through functionally distinct intracellular membrane compartments is regulated by a variety of Rab GTPases and that the activity of these Rab GTPases may influence GPCR function. Moreover, it appears that GPCRs are not simply passive cargo molecules, but that GPCR activation may directly influence Rab GTPase activity and as such, GPCRs may directly control their own targeting between intracellular compartments. This review provides a synopsis of the current knowledge regarding the role of beta-arrestins and Rab GTPases in regulating the intracellular trafficking and function of GPCRs.     

Relating surfactant properties to activity and solubilization of the human adenosine a3 receptor

The effects of various surfactants on the activity and stability of the human adenosine A3 receptor (A3) were investigated. The receptor was expressed using stably transfected HEK293 cells at a concentration of 44 pmol functional receptor per milligram membrane protein and purified using over 50 different nonionic surfactants. A strong correlation was observed between a surfactant's ability to remove A3 from the membrane and the ability of the surfactant to remove A3 selectively relative to other membrane proteins. The activity of A3 once purified also correlates well with the selectivity of the surfactant used. The effects of varying the surfactant were much stronger than those achieved by including A3 ligands in the purification scheme. Notably, all surfactants that gave high efficiency, selectivity and activity fall within a narrow range of hydrophile-lipophile balance values. This effect may reflect the ability of the surfactant to pack effectively at the hydrophobic transmembrane interface. These findings emphasize the importance of identifying appropriate surfactants for a particular membrane protein, and offer promise for the development of rapid, efficient, and systematic methods to facilitate membrane protein purification.     

Recognition in the face of diversity: interactions of heterotrimeric G proteins and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases with activated GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest class of integral membrane protein receptors in the human genome. Despite the great diversity of ligands that activate these GPCRs, they interact with a relatively small number of intracellular proteins to induce profound physiological change. Both heterotrimeric G proteins and GPCR kinases are well known for their ability to specifically recognize GPCRs in their active state. Recent structural studies now suggest that heterotrimeric G proteins and GPCR kinases identify activated receptors via a common molecular mechanism despite having completely different folds.     

Stabilization of Functional Recombinant Cannabinoid Receptor CB2 in Detergent Micelles and Lipid Bilayers

Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is among the most challenging tasks for modern membrane biology. For studies by high resolution analytical methods, these integral membrane receptors have to be expressed in large quantities, solubilized from cell membranes and purified in detergent micelles, which may result in a severe destabilization and a loss of function. Here, we report insights into differential effects of detergents, lipids and cannabinoid ligands on stability of the recombinant cannabinoid receptor CB₂, and provide guidelines for preparation and handling of the fully functional receptor suitable for a wide array of downstream applications. While we previously described the expression in Escherichia coli, purification and liposome-reconstitution of multi-milligram quantities of CB₂, here we report an efficient stabilization of the recombinant receptor in micelles - crucial for functional and structural characterization. The effects of detergents, lipids and specific ligands on structural stability of CB₂ were assessed by studying activation of G proteins by the purified receptor reconstituted into liposomes. Functional structure of the ligand binding pocket of the receptor was confirmed by binding of ²H-labeled ligand measured by solid-state NMR. We demonstrate that a concerted action of an anionic cholesterol derivative, cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHS) and high affinity cannabinoid ligands CP-55,940 or SR-144,528 are required for efficient stabilization of the functional fold of CB₂ in dodecyl maltoside (DDM)/CHAPS detergent solutions. Similar to CHS, the negatively charged phospholipids with the serine headgroup (PS) exerted significant stabilizing effects in micelles while uncharged phospholipids were not effective. The purified CB₂ reconstituted into lipid bilayers retained functionality for up to several weeks enabling high resolution structural studies of this GPCR at physiologically relevant conditions.     

Interaction of transmembrane-spanning segments of the α2-adrenergic receptor with model membranes

Adrenergic receptors are integral membrane proteins involved in cellular signalling that belong to the G protein-coupled receptors. Synthetic peptides resembling the putative transmembrane (TM) segments TM4, TM6 and TM7, of the human α2-adrenergic receptor subtype C10 (P08913) and defined lipid vesicles were used to assess protein-lipid interactions that might be relevant to receptor structure/function. P6 peptide contains the hydrophobic core of TM6 plus the N-terminal hydrophilic motif REKR, while peptides P4 and P7 contained just the hydrophobic stretches of TM4 and TM7, respectively. All the peptides increase their helical tendency at moderate concentrations of TFE (30–50%) and in presence of 1,2-dielaidoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine (DEPE) lipids. However, only P6 displays up to 19% of α-helix in the presence of just the DEPE lipids, evidences a transmembrane orientation and stabilizes the Lα lipid phase. Conversely, P4 and P7 peptides form only stable β-sheet structures in DEPE and favour the non-lamellar, inverted hexagonal (H_II) phase of DEPE by lowering its phase transition temperature. This study highlights the potential of using synthetic peptides derived from the amino acid sequence in the native proteins as templates to understand the behaviour of the transmembrane segments and underline the importance of interfacial anchoring interactions to meet hydrophobic matching requirements and define membrane organization.     

The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors.

G protein-coupled receptors form a large family of integral membrane proteins whose amino acid sequences have seven hydrophobic segments containing distinctive sequence patterns. Rhodopsin, a member of the family, is known to have transmembrane alpha-helices. The probable arrangement of the seven helices, in all receptors, was deduced from structural information extracted from a detailed analysis of the sequences. Constraints established include: (1) each helix must be positioned next to its neighbours in the sequence; (2) helices I, IV and V must be most exposed to the lipid surrounding the receptor and helix III least exposed. (1) is established from the lengths of the shortest loops. (2) is determined by considering: (i) sites of the most conserved residues; (ii) other sites where variability is restricted; (iii) sites that accommodate polar residues; (iv) sites of differences in sequence between pairs or within groups of closely related receptors. Most sites in the last category should be in unimportant positions and are most useful in determining the position and extent of lipid-facing surface in each helix. The structural constraints for the receptors are used to allocate particular helices to the peaks in the recently published projection map of rhodopsin and to propose a tentative three-dimensional arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors.     

G protein-coupled receptor cross-talk: pivotal roles of protein phosphorylation and protein-protein interactions

G protein-coupled receptors are dynamically regulated. Such regulation is frequently associated with covalent posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation, and with regulatory elements. G protein-coupled receptor kinases and casein kinase 1alpha play key roles in agonist-dependent receptor phosphorylations. Cross-talk between different receptors frequently involves second messenger-activated proteins, such as protein kinase C and protein kinase A. There is some evidence indicating that such kinases may not only turn off receptors but also switch their coupling to different G proteins. Receptor tyrosine kinases may phosphorylate and regulate G protein-coupled receptors and recent evidence indicates that other kinases, such as Akt/protein kinase B and phosphoinositide 3-kinase, may participate in such regulations as integrators of signalling.Recent approaches have shed new light on G protein-coupled receptor interactions that provide novel mechanisms of action and regulation. G protein-coupled receptor activities go beyond G proteins and receptors can be partners of exquisitely assembled signalling complexes through molecular bridges composed of multidomain proteins. The possibilities of interaction increase enormously through the diversity of structural and functional domains present in complex proteins, many of them just known as predicted sequences.     

Effects of nonionic surfactants on the solubilization and mineralization of phenanthrene in soil-water systems

The solubilization and mineralization of (14)C-phenanthrene in soil-water systems was examined with several commercially available surface-active agents, viz., an alkyl ethoxylate C(12)E(4); two alkylphenol ethoxylate surfactants: C(8)PE(9.5) and C(9)PE(10.5); two sorbitan ethoxylate surfactants: the sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20) and the sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80); two pairs of nonionic ethoxylate surfactant mixtures: C(12)E(4)/C(12)E(23) at a 1:1 ratio, and C(12-15)E(3)/C(12-15)E(9) at a 1:3 ratio; and two surfactants possessing relatively high critical micelle concentration (CMC) values and low aggregation numbers: CHAPS and octyglucoside. Surface tension experiments were performed to evaluate surfactant sorption onto soil and the surfactant doses required to attain the CMC in the soil-water systems. Surfactant solubilization of (14)C-phenanthrene commenced with the onset of micellization. The addition of surface-active agents was observed not to be beneficial to the microbial mineralization of phenanthrene in the soil-water systems and, for supra-CMC surfactant doses, phenanthrene mineralization was completely inhibited for all the surfactants tested. A comparison of solubilization, surface tension, and mineralization data confirms that the inhibitory effect on microbial degradation of phenanthrene is related to the CMC of the surfactant in the presence of soil. Additional tests demonstrated the recovery of mineralization upon dilution of surfactant concentration to sub-CMC levels, and a relatively high exit rate for phenanthrene from micelles. These tests suggest that the inhibitory effect is probably related to a reversible physiological surfactant micelle-bacteria interaction, possibly through partial complexing or release of membrane material with disrupting membrane lamellar structure. This study indicates that nonionic surfactant solubilization of sorbed hydrophobic organic compounds from soil may not be beneficial for the concomitant enhancement of soil bioremediation. Additional work is needed to address physicochemical processes for bioavailability enhancement, and effects of solubilizing agents on microorganisms for remediation and treatment of hydrophobic organic compounds and nonaqueous phase liquids. (c) 1992 John Wiley & Sons Inc.     

Molecular modelling study of the role of cholesterol in the stimulation of the oxytocin receptor.

Cholesterol, an integral component of membranes in Eucaryota, is a modifier of membrane properties. In vivo studies have demonstrated that cholesterol can also modulate activities of some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are integral membrane proteins. This can result either from an effect of cholesterol on the membrane fluidity or from specific interactions of the membrane cholesterol with the receptor, as recently demonstrated for the cholecystokinin type beta (CCKRbeta) or the oxytocin receptor (OTR). Using molecular modelling, we studied conformational preferences of cholesterol and several of its analogues. Subsequently, we simulated the distributions of their preferred conformations around the surface of OTR, CCKRbeta and a chimeric oxytocin/cholecystokinin receptor. Consequently, we suggest residues on the surface of OTR which are potentially significant in the OTR/cholesterol interaction.     

Rapid Uptake and Degradation of CXCL12 Depend on CXCR7 Carboxyl-terminal Serine/Threonine Residues

CXCL12 signaling through G protein-coupled CXCR4 regulates cell migration during ontogenesis and disease states including cancer and inflammation. The second CXCL12-receptor CXCR7 modulates the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway by acting as a CXCL12 scavenger and exerts G protein-independent functions. Given the distinct properties of CXCR4 and CXCR7, we hypothesized that the distinct C-terminal domains differently regulate receptor trafficking and stability. Here, we examined epitope-tagged wild type and C-terminal mutant receptors in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293) with respect to trafficking, stability, (125)I-CXCL12 degradation, and G protein-coupling. The 24 CXCR7 C-terminal residues were sufficient to promote rapid spontaneous internalization. Replacement of the CXCR7 C terminus with that of CXCR4 (CXCR7-4tail mutant) abolished spontaneous internalization but permitted ligand-induced internalization and phosphorylation at the heterologous domain. The reverse tail-swap caused ligand-independent internalization of the resulting CXCR4-7tail mutant. Receptor-mediated (125)I-CXCL12 uptake and release of (125)I-CXCL12 degradation products were accelerated with receptors bearing the CXCR7 C terminus and impaired after conversion of CXCR7 C-terminal serine/threonine residues into alanines. C-terminal lysine residues were dispensable for plasma membrane targeting and the CXCL12 scavenger function but involved in constitutive degradation of CXCR7. Although the CXCR7 C terminus abolished G protein coupling in the CXCR4-7tail mutant, replacement of the CXCR7 C terminus, CXCR7 second intracellular loop, or both domains with the corresponding CXCR4 domain did not result in a G protein-coupled CXCR7 chimera. Taken together, we provide evidence that the CXCR7 C terminus influences the ligand-uptake/degradation rate, G protein coupling, and receptor stability. Regulatory pathways targeting CXCR7 C-terminal serine/threonine sites may control the CXCL12 scavenger activity of CXCR7.     

Investigation on the mechanism of crystallization of soluble protein in the presence of nonionic surfactant

The mechanism of crystallization of soluble, globular protein (lysozyme) in the presence of nonionic surfactant C8E4 (tetraoxyethylene glycol monooctyl ether) was examined using both static and dynamic light scattering. The interprotein interaction was found to be attractive in solution conditions that yielded crystals and repulsive in the noncrystallizing solution conditions. The validity of the second virial coefficient as a criterion for predicting protein crystallization could be established even in the presence of nonionic surfactants. Our experiments indicate that the origin of the change in interactions can be attributed to the adsorption of nonionic surfactant monomers on soluble proteins, which is generally assumed to be the case with only membrane proteins. This adsorption screens the hydrophobic attractive force and enhances the hydration and electrostatic repulsive forces between protein molecules. Thus at low surfactant concentration, the effective protein-protein interaction remains repulsive. Large surfactant concentrations promote protein crystallization, possibly due to the attractive depletion force caused by the intervening free surfactant micelles.     

A low resolution model for the interaction of G proteins with G protein-coupled receptors

A model is presented for the interaction between G proteins and G protein-coupled receptors. The model is based on the fact that this interaction shows little specificity and thus conserved parts of the G proteins have to interact with conserved parts of the receptors. These parts are a conserved negative residue in the G protein, a fully conserved arginine in the receptor and a series of residues that are not conserved but always hydrophobic like the hydrophobic side of the C-terminal helix of the G protein and the hydrophobic side of a helix in the C-terminal domain of the receptor. Other, mainly cytosolic, factors determine the specificity and regulation of this interaction. The relation between binding and activation will be shown. A large body of experimental evidence supports this model. Despite the fact that the model does not provide atomic resolution, it can be used to explain some experimental data that would otherwise seem inexplicable, and it suggests experiments for its falsification or verification.     

Binding of alkyl polyglucoside surfactants to bacteriorhodopsin and its relation to protein stability

The binding of alkyl polyglucoside surfactants to the integral membrane protein bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and the formation of protein-surfactant complexes are investigated by sedimentation equilibrium via analytical ultracentrifugation and by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS). Contrast variation techniques in SANS enable measurement of the composition of the protein-surfactant complexes and determination of the thickness of the surfactant shell bound to the protein. The results indicate that alkyl polyglucosides can bind to BR as single surfactant layers or as a thicker shell. The thickness of the surfactant shell increases with increasing surfactant tail length, and it is generally unrelated to the aggregation number of the micelles even for a small and predominantly hydrophobic membrane protein such as BR. The aggregation numbers determined by sedimentation equilibrium methods match those measured by SANS, which also allows reconstruction of the shape of the protein-detergent complex. When the surfactant is present as a single layer, the BR loses activity, as measured by absorption spectroscopy, more quickly than it does when the surfactant forms a thicker shell.     

Towards generalizable predictions for G protein-coupled receptor variant expression

Missense mutations that compromise the plasma membrane expression (PME) of integral membrane proteins are the root cause of numerous genetic diseases. Differentiation of this class of mutations from those that specifically modify the activity of the folded protein has proven useful for the development and targeting of precision therapeutics. Nevertheless, it remains challenging to predict the effects of mutations on the stability and/ or expression of membrane proteins. In this work, we utilize deep mutational scanning data to train a series of artificial neural networks to predict the PME of transmembrane domain variants of G protein-coupled receptors from structural and/ or evolutionary features. We show that our best-performing network, which we term the PME predictor, can recapitulate mutagenic trends within rhodopsin and can differentiate pathogenic transmembrane domain variants that cause it to misfold from those that compromise its signaling. This network also generates statistically significant predictions for the relative PME of transmembrane domain variants for another class A G protein-coupled receptor (β₂ adrenergic receptor) but not for an unrelated voltage-gated potassium channel (KCNQ1). Notably, our analyses of these networks suggest structural features alone are generally sufficient to recapitulate the observed mutagenic trends. Moreover, our findings imply that networks trained in this manner may be generalizable to proteins that share a common fold. Implications of our findings for the design of mechanistically specific genetic predictors are discussed.     

Membrane-surfactant Interactions in Lipid Micelles Labeled with l-Anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate

Sonicated lipid micelles, formed from phospholipids isolated from yolks of fresh hen eggs, were used as a model membrane system for studying the effects of several surfactants on membrane properties. The interactions of the surfactants with the model system were followed through the fluorescence of the hydrophobic probe l-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate. The surfactants investigated were polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20), polyoxyethylene thioether (Sterox SK), mono-calcium salt of polymerized aryl alkyl sulfonic acids (Daxad 21), and alkylbenzyl quaternary ammonium halide (AHCO DD 50). All surfactants enhanced fluorescence of the membrane-bound probe, and the degree of this enhancement correlated with the previously established phytotoxicity of these substances. The results indicate that surfactants can produce distinct changes in artificial phospholipid membranes and suggest that this lipid interaction may account for altered membrane permeability characteristics in surfactant-treated plants. The effects are observable for surfactant concentrations as low as 0.0001% (w/v), representing an approximate 10-fold increase in sensitivity for detecting surfactant effects compared with previous results on permeability changes in isolated plant cells.     

New tensio-active molecules stabilize a human G protein-coupled receptor in solution

Structural characterization of membrane proteins is hampered by the instability of the isolated proteins in detergent solutions. Here, we describe a new class of phospholipid-like surfactants that stabilize the G protein-coupled receptor, BLT1. These compounds, called C(13)U(9), C(13)U(19), C(15)U(25) and C(17)U(16), were synthesized by radical polymerization of Tris(hydroxymethyl) acrylamidomethane in the presence of thioglycerol, first endowed with two hydrocarbon chains with variable lengths (13-17 carbon atoms), as transfer reagent. C(13)U(19), C(17)U(16) or C(15)U(25) significantly enhanced the stability of BLT1 in solution compared to what was obtained with common detergents. These molecules therefore represent a promising step towards the structural characterization of BLT1 and possibly other membrane proteins.     

Single-spanning transmembrane domains in cell growth and cell-cell interactions: More than meets the eye?

As a whole, integral membrane proteins represent about one third of sequenced genomes, and more than 50% of currently available drugs target membrane proteins, often cell surface receptors. Some membrane protein classes, with a defined number of transmembrane (TM) helices, are receiving much attention because of their great functional and pharmacological importance, such as G protein-coupled receptors possessing 7 TM segments. Although they represent roughly half of all membrane proteins, bitopic proteins (with only 1 TM helix) have so far been less well characterized. Though they include many essential families of receptors, such as adhesion molecules and receptor tyrosine kinases, many of which are excellent targets for biopharmaceuticals (peptides, antibodies, et al.). A growing body of evidence suggests a major role for interactions between TM domains of these receptors in signaling, through homo and heteromeric associations, conformational changes, assembly of signaling platforms, etc. Significantly, mutations within single domains are frequent in human disease, such as cancer or developmental disorders. This review attempts to give an overview of current knowledge about these interactions, from structural data to therapeutic perspectives, focusing on bitopic proteins involved in cell signaling.Key words: bitopic membrane proteins, transmembrane domains, transmembrane signaling, helix-helix interactions, receptors     

Identification of intramolecular interactions in adrenergic receptors.

Adrenergic receptors are representative of a large family of plasma membrane receptors that interact with G proteins during the process of transmembrane signal transduction. G protein-coupled receptors have a primary structure that is homologous to bacteriorhodopsin and are proposed to have a similar three-dimensional structure; however, it has not yet been possible to examine this hypothesis experimentally. We have used a novel mutagenesis approach to identify intramolecular interactions. Our results indicate that specific amino acids in the seventh hydrophobic segment of alpha 2 and beta 2 adrenergic receptors lie adjacent to the first hydrophobic segment. These studies provide the first experimental evidence defining spatial relationships that exist in the three-dimensional structure of adrenergic receptors.