The basic region of Fos mediates specific DNA binding.

The DNA-binding domains of the members of the Fos and Jun families of proteins consist of a basic region followed by a dimerizing segment with heptad repeats of leucine. Fos-Jun heterodimers and Jun alone, but not Fos alone, bind to the symmetrical sequences TGACTCA (AP-1 site) or TGACGTCA (cAMP response element or CRE). We set out to test the hypothesis that in the Fos-Jun heterodimer the basic region of Fos confers specific DNA-binding properties equivalent to the contribution of the basic region of Jun. Fos-Jun chimeric proteins were prepared consisting of the basic region of one protein joined to the leucine repeat of the other. Heterodimers with mixed Fos and Jun leucine repeat segments showed high affinity binding to the AP-1 site or CRE whether they contained two basic regions from Jun, two basic regions from Fos, or one from each source. Heterodimers with two Fos basic regions showed somewhat greater affinity for the CRE and AP-1 site than the heterodimer with two Jun basic regions. The DNA sequence specificity and the purine and phosphate DNA contact sites for each heterodimer were similar. We conclude that in the Fos-Jun heterodimer the basic region of Fos contributes specific DNA-binding properties equivalent to those of Jun. Our results support a model in which the Fos and Jun basic regions of the Fos-Jun heterodimer each interact with symmetrical DNA half sites.     

The intermediate filament protein vimentin binds specifically to a recombinant integrin alpha2/beta1 cytoplasmic tail complex and co-localizes with native alpha2/beta1 in endothelial cell focal adhesions

Integrin receptors are crucial players in cell adhesion and migration. Identification and characterization of cellular proteins that interact with their short alpha and beta cytoplasmic tails will help to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which integrins mediate bi-directional signaling across the plasma membrane. Integrin alpha2beta1 is a major collagen receptor but to date, only few proteins have been shown to interact with the alpha2 cytoplasmic tail or with the alpha2beta1 complex. In order to identify novel binding partners of a alpha2beta1cytoplasmic domain complex, we have generated recombinant GST-fusion proteins, incorporating the leucine zipper heterodimerization cassettes of Jun and Fos. To ascertain proper functionality of the recombinant proteins, interaction with natural binding partners was tested. GST-alpha2 and GST-Jun alpha2 bound His-tagged calreticulin while GST-beta1 and GST-Fos beta1 proteins bound talin. In screening assays for novel binding partners, the immobilized GST-Jun alpha2/GST-Fos beta1 heterodimeric complex, but not the single subunits, interacted specifically with endothelial cell-derived vimentin. Vimentin, an abundant intermediate filament protein, has previously been shown to co-localize with alphavbeta3-positive focal contacts. Here, we provide evidence that this interaction also occurs with alpha2beta1-enriched focal adhesions and we further show that this association is lost after prolonged adhesion of endothelial cells to collagen.     

DNA binding activities of three murine Jun proteins: stimulation by Fos

Three members of the Jun/AP-1 family have been identified in mouse cDNA libraries: c-Jun, Jun-B, and Jun-D. We have compared the DNA binding properties of the Jun proteins by using in vitro translation products in gel retardation assays. Each protein was able to bind to the consensus AP-1 site (TGACTCA) and, with lower affinity, to related sequences, including the cyclic AMP response element TGACGTCA. The relative binding to the oligonucleotides tested was similar for the different proteins. The Jun proteins formed homodimers and heterodimers with other members of the family, and they were bound to the AP-1 site as dimers. When Fos translation product was present, DNA binding by Jun increased markedly, and the DNA complex contained Fos. The C-terminal homology region of Jun was sufficient for DNA binding, dimer formation, and interaction with Fos. Our general conclusion is that c-Jun, Jun-B, and Jun-D are similar in their DNA binding properties and in their interaction with Fos. If there are functional differences between them, they are likely to involve other activities of the Jun proteins.