Asymmetric cell division and cell fate in plants

A variety of approaches has recently been employed to investigate how sister cells adopt distinct fates following asymmetric divisions during plant development. Surgical and drug studies have been used to analyze asymmetric divisions during both early embryogenesis in brown algae and pollen development in tobacco. Genetic screens have been used to identify genes in Arabidopsis thaliana that are required for specific asymmetric cell divisions during pollen and root development. These studies indicate that cell polarity and division orientation are closely tied to the process of cell fate specification, and suggest that differential inheritance of determinants and positional information may both be involved in the specification of cell fates following asymmetric cell division.     

The role of GlsA in the evolution of asymmetric cell division in the green alga<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Volvox carteri</Emphasis>

Volvox carteri, a green alga in the order Volvocales, contains two completely differentiated cell types, small motile somatic cells and large reproductive cells called gonidia, that are set apart from each other during embryogenesis by a series of visibly asymmetric cell divisions. Mutational analysis has revealed a class of genes (gonidialess, gls) that are required specifically for asymmetric divisions in V. carteri, but that are dispensable for symmetric divisions. Previously we cloned one of these genes, glsA, and showed that it encodes a chaperone-like protein (GlsA) that has close orthologs in a diverse set of eukaryotes, ranging from fungi to vertebrates and higher plants. In the present study we set out to explore the role of glsA in the evolution of asymmetric division in the volvocine algae by cloning and characterizing a glsA ortholog from one of the simplest members of the group, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, which does not undergo asymmetric divisions. This ortholog (which we have named gar1, for glsA related) is predicted to encode a protein that is 70% identical to GlsA overall, and that is most closely related to GlsA in the same domains that are most highly conserved between GlsA and its other known orthologs. We report that a gar1 transgene fully complements the glsA mutation in V. carteri, a result that suggests that asymmetric division probably arose through the modification of a gene whose product interacts with GlsA, but not through a modification of glsA itself.     

Asymmetric cell division and neoplastic growth

Asymmetric division was formed as an evolutionary conserved mechanism of self-maintenance of cellular populations and creation of a variety of cell types during ontogenesis. Asymmetric division enables a special mechanism of determinant segregation, which further defines development of daughter cells. As a result two unequal cells are developed. Recent research demonstrates the interplay of disturbed asymmetric division of stem cells and tumorigenesis. Genes implicated in cell’s polarization and normal progression of asymmetric mitosis were identified in Drosophila. Other genes regulating asymmetric mitosis were described as tumor suppressors, and their mutations were shown to initiate neoplastic growth. Comparative study of gene expression suggests that the disturbance of asymmetric division might be one of the reasons for neoplasm progression in vertebrates.     

Cell polarity and the mechanism of asymmetric cell division

During development one mechanism for generating different cell types is asymmetric cell division, by which a cell divides and contributes different factors to each of its daughter cells. Asymmetric cell division occurs through out the eukaryotic kingdom, from yeast to humans. Many asymmetric cell divisions occur in a defined orientation. This implies a cellular mechanism for sensing direction, which must ultimately lead to differences in gene expression between two daughter cells. In this review, we describe two classes of molecules: regulatory factors that are differentially expressed upon asymmetric cell division, and components of a signal transduction pathway that may define cell polarity. The lin-11 and mec-3 genes of C. elegans, the Isl-1 gene of mammals and the HO gene of yeast, encode regulatory factors that determine cell type of one daughter after asymmetric cell division. The CDC24 and CDC42 genes of yeast affect both bud positioning and orientation of mating projections, and thus may define a general cellular polarity. We speculate that molecules such as Cdc24 and Cdc42 may regulate expression of genes such as lin-11, mec-3, Isl-1 and HO upon asymmetric cell division.     

Establishing cell polarity in development

Polarity is a common feature of many different cell types, including the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote, the Drosophila oocyte and mammalian epithelial cells. The initial establishment of cell polarity depends on asymmetric cues that lead to reorganization of the cytoskeleton and polarized localization of several cortical proteins that act downstream of the polarization cues. The past year revealed that homologs of the C. elegans par (partitioning defective) genes are also essential for establishing polarity in Drosophila and vertebrate cells. There is growing evidence that the proteins encoded by these genes interact with key regulators of both the actin and the microtubule cytoskeletons.     

Asymmetric localization of frizzled and the determination of notch-dependent cell fate in the Drosophila eye

BACKGROUND: During patterning of the Drosophila eye, a critical step is the Notch-mediated cell fate decision that determines the identities of the R3/R4 photoreceptor pair in each ommatidium. Depending on the decision taken, the ommatidium adopts either the dorsal or ventral chiral form. This decision is directed by the activity of the planar polarity genes, and, in particular, higher activity of the receptor Frizzled confers R3 fate. RESULTS: We present evidence that Frizzled does not modulate Notch activity via Rho GTPases and a JNK cascade as previously proposed. We find that the planar polarity proteins Frizzled, Dishevelled, Flamingo, and Strabismus adopt asymmetric protein localizations in the developing photoreceptors. These protein localizations correlate with the bias of Notch activity between R3/R4, suggesting that they are necessary to modulate Notch activity between these cells. Additional data support a mechanism for regulation of Notch activity that could involve direct interactions between Dishevelled and Notch at the cell cortex. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of our findings, we conclude that Rho GTPases/JNK cascades are not major effectors of planar polarity in the Drosophila eye. We propose a new model for the control of R3/R4 photoreceptor fate by Frizzled, whereby asymmetric protein localization is likely to be a critical step in modulation of Notch activity. This modulation may occur via direct interactions between Notch and Dishevelled.     

The YABBY gene family and abaxial cell fate

The establishment of abaxial-adaxial polarity in lateral organs involves factors intrinsic to the primordia and interactions with the apical meristem from which they are derived. Recently, a small plant-specific family of genes, the YABBY gene family, has been proposed to specify abaxial cell fate. Each asymmetric above-ground lateral organ expresses at least one member of the family in a polar manner, and loss- and gain-of-function studies indicate that they are sufficient to specify abaxial cell fate and that they act in both distinct and redundant manners.     

Asymmetric cell division in the morphogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster macrochaetae

Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is the basic process which creates diversity in the cells of multicellular organisms. As a result of asymmetric cell division, daughter cells acquire the ability to differentiate and specialize in a given direction, which is different from that of their parent cells and from each other. This type of division is observed in a wide range of living organisms from bacteria to vertebrates. It has been shown that the molecular-genetic control mechanism of ACD is evolutionally conservative. The proteins involved in the process of ACD in different kinds of animals have a high degree of homology. Sensory organs--setae (macrochaetae)--of Drosophila are widely used as a model system for studying the genetic control mechanisms of asymmetric division. Setae located in an orderly manner on the head and body of the fly play the role of mechanoreceptors. Each of them consists of four specialized cells--offspring of the only sensory organ precursor cell (SOPC), which differentiates from the imaginal wing disc at the larval stage of the late third age. The basic differentiation and further specialization of the daughter cells of SOPC is an asymmetric division process. In this summary, experimental data on genes and their products controlling asymmetric division of SOPC and daughter cells, and also the specialization of the latter, have been systemized. The basic mechanisms which determine the time cells enter into asymmetric mitosis and which provides the structural characteristics of the asymmetric division process--the polar distribution of protein determinants Numb and Neuralized--the orientation of the mitotic spindle in relation to these determinants, and the uneven segregation of the determinants into the daughter cells that determines the direction of their development have been discussed.     

Cell polarity and asymmetric cell division: the C. elegans early embryo

Cell polarity is crucial for many functions including cell migration, tissue organization and asymmetric cell division. In animal cells, cell polarity is controlled by the highly conserved PAR (PARtitioning defective) proteins. par genes have been identified in Caenorhabditis elegans in screens for maternal lethal mutations that disrupt cytoplasmic partitioning and asymmetric division. Although PAR proteins were identified more than 20 years ago, our understanding on how they regulate polarity and how they are regulated is still incomplete. In this chapter we review our knowledge of the processes of cell polarity establishment and maintenance, and asymmetric cell division in the early C. elegans embryo. We discuss recent findings that highlight new players in cell polarity and/or reveal the molecular details on how PAR proteins regulate polarity processes.     

Regulatory genes controlling cell fate choice in embryonic and adult neural stem cells

Neural stem cells are the most immature progenitor cells in the nervous system and are defined by their ability to self-renew by symmetric division as well as to give rise to more mature progenitors of all neural lineages by asymmetric division (multipotentiality). The interest in neural stem cells has been growing in the past few years following the demonstration of their presence also in the adult nervous system of several mammals, including humans. This observation implies that the brain, once thought to be entirely post-mitotic, must have at least a limited capacity for self-renewal. This raises the possibility that the adult nervous system may still have the necessary plasticity to undergo repair of inborn defects and acquired injuries, if ways can be found to exploit the potential of neural stem cells (either endogenous or derived from other sources) to replace damaged or defective cells. A full understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating generation and maintenance of neural stem cells, their choice between different differentiation programmes and their migration properties is essential if these cells are to be used for therapeutic applications. Here, we summarize what is currently known of the genes and the signalling pathways involved in these mechanisms.     

Regulation of cell polarity by controlled proteolytic systems

Epithelial and neuronal cells are highly asymmetric, with discrete regions responsible for different roles that underlie the generation of specific compartments within cells that are distinct in biochemical composition, structure, and morphology that ultimately lead to distinct functions. Controlled and specific molecular targeting and sorting have been studied to understand the generation of asymmetric domains inside cells. Recently, a new and complementary explanation has emerged to account for the generation of domains that are enriched by a subset of proteins or polarization determinants: local proteolysis. In this review, we discuss the most conspicuous proteolytic systems that may contribute to the generation of cell polarity, namely the ubiquitin-proteosome and the calpain systems. Specifically, we focus this review on two cellular processes that depend on the acquisition of cell polarity; cell migration and the establishment of an axon in a neuronal cell.     

Surface molecules and cell interactions

Many of the cell surface molecules of lymphocytes or their precursors are expressed in an unpredictable way on a limited set of other cell types. This often seems to involve expression on lymphoid and brain cells. The Thy-1 antigen is in this category, being a major glycoprotein of murine neuronal cells, fibroblasts and thymocytes. Structural studies show that this molecule is homologous with immunoglobulin domains which are the structural sub-units of all immunoglobulin polypeptides. Thy-1 is the size of one immunoglobulin domain and its sequence is most homologous with variable regions of immunoglobulins.It is suggested that Thy-1 is one of a set of surface molecules concerned with triggering interactions between cells and that this is the primitive function of the immunoglobulin domain. Cell interactions could be mediated by domain-like structures and receptors for them in a way which parallels the triggering of immunological effector reactions by the interaction of receptors with immunoglobulin constant regions. If this is so then the structure seen in the immunoglobulin domain would have evolved along with the evolution of cell organisation. The genes specifying the cell interaction molecules could then have provided the genetic material for the evolution of antibody and histocompatibility antigen at the time of vertebrate emergence.     

(A)symmetric stem cell replication and cancer

Most tissues in metazoans undergo continuous turnover due to cell death or epithelial shedding. Since cellular replication is associated with an inherent risk of mutagenesis, tissues are maintained by a small group of stem cells (SCs) that replicate slowly to maintain their own population and that give rise to differentiated cells. There is increasing evidence that many tumors are also maintained by a small population of cancer stem cells that may arise by mutations from normal SCs. SC replication can be either symmetric or asymmetric. The former can lead to expansion of the SC pool. We describe a simple model to evaluate the impact of (a)symmetric SC replication on the expansion of mutant SCs and to show that mutations that increase the probability of asymmetric replication can lead to rapid mutant SC expansion in the absence of a selective fitness advantage. Mutations in several genes can lead to this process and may be at the root of the carcinogenic process.     

Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division.

BACKGROUND: Both symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions are required for the generation of appropriate cell lineages during development. Wild-type Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells divide in a symmetric fashion to produce two similar rod-shaped daughter cells. Formins are proteins with conserved roles in cell polarity, cytokinesis, and the regulation of actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. RESULTS: Here, we identify and characterize a new S. pombe formin, for3p. for3 Delta mutant cells divide in an asymmetric manner; a mother cell divides medially to produce one daughter cell that develops into a monopolar cell and one daughter that develops into a bipolar cell. Both daughter cells recapitulate similar asymmetric lineages themselves. Inheritance of the bipolar pattern correlates with inheritance of the recent birth scar, not with asymmetry in the spindle pole bodies. for3 Delta mutants lack interphase actin cables and have delocalized actin patch and myo52p (type V myosin) distributions. for3 Delta cells have normal microtubule dynamics and cortical interactions but have defects in microtubule organization and increased numbers of microtubule bundles. for3p-GFP is localized at both cell tips in an actin-dependent manner and at the cell division site. CONCLUSIONS: for3p is a cell polarity factor required for interphase actin cable formation and microtubule organization. The for3 Delta phenotype suggests that cells are able to grow in a polarized manner even in the absence of functional actin cables and polarized distribution of actin patches. for3p and possibly actin cables are part of a regulatory network that ensures that cell divisions are symmetric.