Structural basis of the Rho GTPase signaling

Small GTPases of the Rho family serve as conformational switches in a wide variety of signal transduction pathways that regulate diverse cellular functions. The GTP-bound forms of Rho GTPases are capable of interacting with downstream effectors that control cytoskeletal rearrangements. Regulators that stimulate nucleotide exchange, the hydrolytic cycle and distribution between the membrane and cytosol control the switch. Detailed pictures of Rho GTPase switching, effector recognition and regulation by regulators have emerged from recent structural investigations. These include the most extensively studied Rho GTPases, RhoA, Rac1, 2 and Cdc42, and their complexes with effectors and regulators. These studies have revealed the general diversity of effector and regulator structures, and in particular the structural features concerning the specific interactions involved in Rho effector recognition and regulator interactions with Rho GTPase. These findings provide a critical insight into the nature of Rho GTPase activity and consequently allow for a detailed manipulation of signaling pathways mediated by these proteins.     

G proteins, effectors and GAPs: structure and mechanism

G proteins form a diverse family of regulatory GTPases which, in the GTP-bound state, bind to and activate downstream effectors. Structure of Ras homologs bound to effector domains have revealed mechanisms by which G proteins couple GTP binding to effector activation and achieve specificity. Complexes between structurally unrelated GTPase-activating proteins with complementary G proteins suggest common mechanisms by which GTP hydrolysis is stimulated via direct interactions with conformationally labile switch regions of the G protein.     

Production of small cysteine‐rich effector proteins in Escherichia coli for structural and functional studies

Although the lifestyles and infection strategies of plant pathogens are diverse, a prevailing feature is the use of an arsenal of secreted proteins, known as effectors, which aid in microbial infection. In the case of eukaryotic filamentous pathogens, such as fungi and oomycetes, effector proteins are typically dissimilar, at the protein sequence level, to known protein families and functional domains. Consequently, we currently have a limited understanding of how fungal and oomycete effectors promote disease. Protein biochemistry and structural biology are two methods that can contribute greatly to the understanding of protein function. Both techniques are dependent on obtaining proteins that are pure and functional, and generally require the use of heterologous recombinant protein expression systems. Here, we present a general scheme and methodology for the production and characterization of small cysteine‐rich (SCR) effectors utilizing Escherichia coli expression systems. Using this approach, we successfully produced cysteine‐rich effectors derived from the biotrophic fungal pathogen Melampsora lini and the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Parastagonospora nodorum. Access to functional recombinant proteins facilitated crystallization and functional experiments. These results are discussed in the context of a general workflow that may serve as a template for others interested in understanding the function of SCR effector(s) from their plant pathogen(s) of interest.     

Double mutant cycle thermodynamic analysis of the hydrophobic Cdc42-ACK protein-protein interaction

Protein-protein interactions such as those between small G proteins and their effector proteins control most cell signaling pathways and thereby govern many cellular processes in both normal and disease states. Each small G protein interacts with several effectors, some shared between similar G proteins and others unique to a single GTPase. Although there is knowledge of the structural basis of these interactions, there is limited understanding of their thermodynamic basis. This is particularly significant because of the intrinsic conformational flexibility of the interacting partners. Here we have conducted a double mutant thermodynamic cycle for two key hydrophobic interactions in the Cdc42-ACK interface: Val42Cdc42-Ile463ACK and Leu174Cdc42-Leu449ACK. Val42 and Leu174 are known to be energetically important in this complex from previous thermodynamic studies, and their respective partners were predicted from the structure of the complex. Such a study has not been hitherto performed on any hydrophobic protein-protein interaction. The results confirm that a significant proportion of the overall interaction is dependent upon these residues, but in neither case is the direct interaction between the side chains the predominant energetic force. Indeed, the interaction of the side chains of Val42 and Ile463 appears to exert an energetic penalty. Rather, the stabilization of the complex, which requires the presence of these two pairs of residues, appears to be due to conformational changes, or interactions, that are not easily visualized in the structure of the complexes. In this respect, it is noteworthy that isolated Cdc42 shows regions of disorder and isolated ACK has no stable tertiary structure, whereas the Cdc42-ACK complex has a well-defined quaternary structure. Such changes may well be critical for the known selectivity of Cdc42 and related proteins such as Rho and Rac, for their wide range of effectors.     

Structure of small G proteins and their regulators

In recent years small G proteins have become an intensively studied group of regulatory GTP hydrolases involved in cell signaling. More than 100 small G proteins have been identified in eucaryotes from protozoan to human. The small G protein superfamily includes Ras, Rho Rab, Rac, Sarl/Arf and Ran homologs, which take part in numerous and diverse cellular processes, such as gene expression, cytoskeleton reorganization, microtubule organization, and vesicular and nuclear transport. These proteins share a common structural core, described as the G domain, and significant sequence similarity. In this paper we review the available data on G domain structure, together with a detailed analysis of the mechanism of action. We also present small G protein regulators: GTPase activating proteins that bind to a catalytic G domain and increase its low intrinsic hydrolase activity, GTPase dissociation inhibitors that stabilize the GDP-bound, inactive state of G proteins, and guanine nucleotide exchange factors that accelerate nucleotide exchange in response to cellular signals. Additionally, in this paper we describe some aspects of small G protein interactions with down-stream effectors.     

Diverse mechanisms of metaeffector activity in an intracellular bacterial pathogen,Legionella pneumophila

Pathogens deliver complex arsenals of translocated effector proteins to host cells during infection, but the extent to which these proteins are regulated once inside the eukaryotic cell remains poorly defined. Among all bacterial pathogens, Legionella pneumophila maintains the largest known set of translocated substrates, delivering over 300 proteins to the host cell via its Type IVB, Icm/Dot translocation system. Backed by a few notable examples of effector–effector regulation in L. pneumophila, we sought to define the extent of this phenomenon through a systematic analysis of effector–effector functional interaction. We used Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an established proxy for the eukaryotic host, to query > 108,000 pairwise genetic interactions between two compatible expression libraries of ~330 L. pneumophila‐translocated substrates. While capturing all known examples of effector–effector suppression, we identify fourteen novel translocated substrates that suppress the activity of other bacterial effectors and one pair with synergistic activities. In at least nine instances, this regulation is direct—a hallmark of an emerging class of proteins called metaeffectors, or “effectors of effectors”. Through detailed structural and functional analysis, we show that metaeffector activity derives from a diverse range of mechanisms, shapes evolution, and can be used to reveal important aspects of each cognate effector's function. Metaeffectors, along with other, indirect, forms of effector–effector modulation, may be a common feature of many intracellular pathogens—with unrealized potential to inform our understanding of how pathogens regulate their interactions with the host cell.     

Non-canonical signaling and localizations of heterotrimeric G proteins

Heterotrimeric G proteins typically transduce signals from G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to effector proteins. In the conventional G protein signaling paradigm, the G protein is located at the cytoplasmic surface of the plasma membrane, where, after activation by an agonist-bound GPCR, the GTP-bound Gα and free Gβγ bind to and regulate a number of well-studied effectors, including adenylyl cyclase, phospholipase Cβ, RhoGEFs and ion channels. However, research over the past decade or more has established that G proteins serve non-canonical roles in the cell, whereby they regulate novel effectors, undergo activation independently of a GPCR, and/or function at subcellular locations other than the plasma membrane. This review will highlight some of these non-canonical aspects of G protein signaling, focusing on direct interactions of G protein subunits with cytoskeletal and cell adhesion proteins, the role of G proteins in cell division, and G protein signaling at diverse organelles.     

WD40-repeat proteins control the flow of Gβγ signaling for directional cell migration

The ability of cells to generate a highly polarized intracellular signal through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is essential for their migration toward chemoattractants. The Gβγ subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins play a critical role in transmitting chemotactic signals from GPCRs via the activation of diverse effectors, including PLCβ and PI3K, primarily at the leading edge of cells. Although Gβγ can directly activate many of these effectors through protein-protein interactions in vitro, it remains unclear how Gβγ spatially and temporally orchestrates the activation of these effectors in vivo. A yeast two-hybrid screen for Gβ interacting proteins identified two WD40-repeat domain containing proteins, RACK1 and WDR26, which are predicted to serve as scaffolding/adaptor proteins. Previous data indicates that RACK1 negatively regulates Gβγ-mediated leukocyte migration by inhibiting Gβγ-stimulated PLCβ and PI3K activities. In contrast, recently published work by Sun et al. indicates that WDR26 promotes leukocyte migration by enhancing Gβγ-mediated signal transduction. These findings reveal a novel mechanism regulating Gβγ signaling during chemotaxis, namely through the positive and negative regulation of WDR26 and RACK1 on Gβγ to promote and fine tune Gβγ-mediated effector activation, ultimately governing the ability of cells to polarize and migrate toward a chemoattractant gradient.     

Arabidopsis G‐protein interactome reveals connections to cell wall carbohydrates and morphogenesis

The heterotrimeric G‐protein complex is minimally composed of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits. In the classic scenario, the G‐protein complex is the nexus in signaling from the plasma membrane, where the heterotrimeric G‐protein associates with heptahelical G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs), to cytoplasmic target proteins called effectors. Although a number of effectors are known in metazoans and fungi, none of these are predicted to exist in their canonical forms in plants. To identify ab initio plant G‐protein effectors and scaffold proteins, we screened a set of proteins from the G‐protein complex using two‐hybrid complementation in yeast. After deep and exhaustive interrogation, we detected 544 interactions between 434 proteins, of which 68 highly interconnected proteins form the core G‐protein interactome. Within this core, over half of the interactions comprising two‐thirds of the nodes were retested and validated as genuine in planta. Co‐expression analysis in combination with phenotyping of loss‐of‐function mutations in a set of core interactome genes revealed a novel role for G‐proteins in regulating cell wall modification.     

EffectorK,a comprehensive resource to mine for Ralstonia,Xanthomonas, and other published effector interactors in the Arabidopsis proteome

Pathogens deploy effector proteins that interact with host proteins to manipulate the host physiology to the pathogen's own benefit. However, effectors can also be recognized by host immune proteins, leading to the activation of defence responses. Effectors are thus essential components in determining the outcome of plant–pathogen interactions. Despite major efforts to decipher effector functions, our current knowledge on effector biology is scattered and often limited. In this study, we conducted two systematic large-scale yeast two-hybrid screenings to detect interactions between Arabidopsis thaliana proteins and effectors from two vascular bacterial pathogens: Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum and Xanthomonas campestris. We then constructed an interactomic network focused on Arabidopsis and effector proteins from a wide variety of bacterial, oomycete, fungal, and invertebrate pathogens. This network contains our experimental data and protein–protein interactions from 2,035 peer-reviewed publications (48,200 Arabidopsis–Arabidopsis and 1,300 Arabidopsis–effector protein interactions). Our results show that effectors from different species interact with both common and specific Arabidopsis interactors, suggesting dual roles as modulators of generic and adaptive host processes. Network analyses revealed that effector interactors, particularly “effector hubs” and bacterial core effector interactors, occupy important positions for network organization, as shown by their larger number of protein interactions and centrality. These interactomic data were incorporated in EffectorK, a new graph-oriented knowledge database that allows users to navigate the network, search for homology, or find possible paths between host and/or effector proteins. EffectorK is available at www.effectork.org and allows users to submit their own interactomic data.     

Thermodynamics of Ras/effector and Cdc42/effector interactions probed by isothermal titration calorimetry

Proliferation, differentiation, and morphology of eucaryotic cells is regulated by a large network of signaling molecules. Among the major players are members of the Ras and Rho/Rac subfamilies of small GTPases that bind to different sets of effector proteins. Recognition of multiple effectors is important for communicating signals into different pathways, leading to the question of how an individual GTPase achieves tight binding to diverse targets. To understand the observed specificity, detailed information about binding energetics is expected to complement the information gained from the three-dimensional structures of GTPase/effector protein complexes. Here, the thermodynamics of the interaction of four closely related members of the Ras subfamily with four different effectors and, additionally, the more distantly related Cdc42/WASP couple were quantified by means of isothermal titration calorimetry. The heat capacity changes upon complex formation were rationalized in light of the GTPase/effector complex structures. Changes in enthalpy, entropy, and heat capacity of association with various Ras proteins are similar for the same effector. In contrast, although the structures of the Ras-binding domains are similar, the thermodynamics of the Ras/Raf and Ras/Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator interactions are quite different. The energy profile of the Cdc42/WASP interaction is similar to Ras/Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator, despite largely different structures and interface areas of the complexes. Water molecules in the interface cannot fully account for the observed discrepancy but may explain the large range of Ras/effector binding specificity. The differences in the thermodynamic parameters, particularly the entropy changes, could help in the design of effector-specific inhibitors that selectively block a single pathway.     

Regulation of vascular endothelial junction stability and remodeling through Rap1-Rasip1 signaling

The ability of blood vessels to sense and respond to stimuli such as fluid flow, shear stress, and trafficking of immune cells is critical to the proper function of the vascular system. Endothelial cells constantly remodel their cell–cell junctions and the underlying cytoskeletal network in response to these exogenous signals. This remodeling, which depends on regulation of the linkage between actin and integral junction proteins, is controlled by a complex signaling network consisting of small G proteins and their various downstream effectors. In this commentary, we summarize recent developments in understanding the small G protein RAP1 and its effector RASIP1 as critical mediators of endothelial junction stabilization, and the relationship between RAP1 effectors and modulation of different subsets of endothelial junctions.     

Combinatorial actions of bacterial effectors revealed by exploiting genetic tools in yeast

While yeast has been extensively used as a model system for analysing protein–protein and genetic interactions, in the context of bacterial pathogenesis, the use of yeast‐based tools has largely been limited to identifying interactions between pathogen effectors and host targets. In their recent work, Ensminger and colleagues (Urbanus et al, 2016 ) use the combinatorial power of yeast genetics to systematically screen all known Legionella pneumophila effector proteins for effector–effector interactions. They provide new insights into how bacterial effectors balance host cell perturbation and describe mechanisms used by “meta‐effectors” to directly modulate target effector activity.     

Structure of the small G protein Rap2 in a non-catalytic complex with GTP

We report a novel crystal form of the small G protein Rap2A in complex with GTP which has no GTPase activity in the crystal. The asymmetric unit contains two complexes which show that a conserved switch I residue, Tyr 32, contributes an extra hydrogen bond to the gamma-phosphate of GTP as compared to related structures with GTP analogs. Since GTP is not hydrolyzed in the crystal, this interaction is unlikely to contribute to the intrinsic GTPase activity. The comparison of other G protein structures to the Rap2-GTP complex suggests that an equivalent interaction is likely to exist in their GTP form, whether unbound or bound to an effector. This interaction has to be released to allow the GAP-activated GTPase, and presumably the intrinsic GTPase activity as well. We also discuss the definition of the flexible regions and their hinges in the light of this structure and the expanding database of G protein structures. We propose that the switch I and switch II undergo either partial or complete disorder-to-order transitions according to their cellular status, thus defining a complex energy landscape comprising more than two conformational states. We observe in addition that the region connecting the switch I and switch II is flexible in Rap2 and other G proteins. This region may be important for protein-protein interactions and possibly behave as a conformational lever arm, as characterized for Arf. Taken together, these observations suggest that the structural mechanisms of small G proteins are significantly driven by entropy-based free energy changes.     

Identification,Structure, and Function of a Novel Type VI Secretion Peptidoglycan Glycoside Hydrolase Effector-Immunity Pair

Bacteria employ type VI secretion systems (T6SSs) to facilitate interactions with prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Despite the widespread identification of T6SSs among Gram-negative bacteria, the number of experimentally validated substrate effector proteins mediating these interactions remains small. Here, employing an informatics approach, we define novel families of T6S peptidoglycan glycoside hydrolase effectors. Consistent with the known intercellular self-intoxication exhibited by the T6S pathway, we observe that each effector gene is located adjacent to a hypothetical open reading frame encoding a putative periplasmically localized immunity determinant. To validate our sequence-based approach, we functionally investigate a representative family member from the soil-dwelling bacterium Pseudomonas protegens. We demonstrate that this protein is secreted in a T6SS-dependent manner and that it confers a fitness advantage in growth competition assays with Pseudomonas putida. In addition, we determined the 1.4 Å x-ray crystal structure of this effector in complex with its cognate immunity protein. The structure reveals the effector shares highest overall structural similarity to a glycoside hydrolase family associated with peptidoglycan N-acetylglucosaminidase activity, suggesting that T6S peptidoglycan glycoside hydrolase effector families may comprise significant enzymatic diversity. Our structural analyses also demonstrate that self-intoxication is prevented by the immunity protein through direct occlusion of the effector active site. This work significantly expands our current understanding of T6S effector diversity.     

Residues in Cdc42 that specify binding to individual CRIB effector proteins

Cdc42 is a member of the Rho family of small G proteins. Signal transduction events emanating from Cdc42 lead to cytoskeletal rearrangements, cell proliferation, and cell differentiation. Many effector proteins have been identified for Cdc42; however, it is not clear how certain effectors specifically recognize and bind to Cdc42, as opposed to Rac or Rho, or in many cases, which effector controls what cellular events. Mutations were introduced into Cdc42 at residues: Met1, Val8, Phe28, Tyr32, Val33, Thr35, Val36, Phe37, Asp38, Tyr40, Val42, Met45, Ile46, Glu127, Ala130, Asn132, Gln134, Lys135, and Leu174. Measurements were made of their equilibrium binding constants to the Cdc42 binding domains of the CRIB effectors ACK, PAK, and WASP and to the GTPase-activating protein Rho GAP. Generally, mutations in the effector loop have an equally deleterious effect on binding to all CRIB proteins tested, though the F37A mutation resulted in significant selectivity. Residues outside the effector loop were found to be important for binding of Cdc42 to CRIB containing proteins and also to contribute to selectivity. Mutations such as V42A and L174A resulted in large, selective changes in binding to specific CRIB effectors. Neither mutation resulted in alteration in PAK binding, whereas both severely disrupt binding to ACK and only L174A disrupted binding to WASP. These mutations are interpreted using the structures of the Cdc42/ACK and Cdc42/WASP complexes to give insight into how effectors can specifically recognize Cdc42. Those mutations in Cdc42 that inhibit certain interactions, while retaining others, should aid investigations of the role of specific effectors in Cdc42 signaling in vivo.     

G proteins control diverse pathways of transmembrane signaling

Hormones, neurotransmitters, and autacoids interact with specific receptors and thereby trigger a series of molecular events that ultimately produce their biological effects. These receptors, localized in the plasma membrane, carry binding sites for ligands as diverse as peptides (e.g., glucagon, neuropeptides), lipids (e.g., prostaglandins), nucleosides and nucleotides (e.g., adenosine), and amines (e.g., catecholamines, serotonin). These receptors do not interest directly with their respective downstream effector (i.e., an ion channel and/or an enzyme that synthesizes a second messenger); rather, they control one or several target systems via the activation of an intermediary guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein or G protein. G proteins serve as signal transducers, linking extracellularly oriented receptors to membrane-bound effectors. Traffic in these pathways is regulated by a GTP (on)-GDP (off) switch, which is regulated by the receptor. The combination of classical biochemistry and recombinant DNA technology has resulted in the discovery of many members of the G protein family. These approaches, complemented in particular by electrophysiological experiments, have also identified several effectors that are regulated by G proteins. We can safely assume that current lists of G proteins and the functions that they control are incomplete.     

Biochemical functions of Yersinia type III effectors

Yersinia uses a type III secretion system (TTSS) to deliver six effector proteins into host cells. These six proteins harbor distinct activities that are mimicries of host functions but often have acquired unique biochemical features. The host targets for these effectors appear to be limited to a few key signaling components such as G proteins and kinases, whereas their models of action are diverse and sophisticated. The functions of these effectors are to subvert the host immune defense response, including alterations of the cytoskeleton structure, inhibition of phagocytic clearance, blockage of cytokine production, and induction of apoptosis. These effectors also interfere with communications between the innate and the adaptive immune response, thus aiding the establishment of a systemic infection.     

Coiled-coil domains enhance the membrane association of Salmonella type III effectors

Coiled-coil domains in eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins contribute to diverse structural and regulatory functions. Here we have used in silico analysis to predict which proteins in the proteome of the enteric pathogen, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, harbour coiled-coil domains. We found that coiled-coil domains are especially prevalent in virulence-associated proteins, including type III effectors. Using SopB as a model coiled-coil domain type III effector, we have investigated the role of this motif in various aspects of effector function including chaperone binding, secretion and translocation, protein stability, localization and biological activity. Compared with wild-type SopB, SopB coiled-coil mutants were unstable, both inside bacteria and after translocation into host cells. In addition, the putative coiled-coil domain was required for the efficient membrane association of SopB in host cells. Since many other Salmonella effectors were predicted to contain coiled-coil domains, we also investigated the role of this motif in their intracellular targeting in mammalian cells. Mutation of the predicted coiled-coil domains in PipB2, SseJ and SopD2 also eliminated their membrane localization in mammalian cells. These findings suggest that coiled-coil domains represent a common membrane-targeting determinant for Salmonella type III effectors.