A monoclonal antibody that inhibits cyclic AMP binding by the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein

The monoclonal antibody (mAb) 64D1 was found to inhibit cAMP binding by the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) from Escherichia coli (Li, X.-M., and Krakow, J. S. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 4378-4383). CRP is relatively resistant to attack by the Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease, chymotrypsin, trypsin, and subtilisin whereas both mAb 64D1-CRP and cAMP-CRP are attacked by these proteases yielding N-terminal core fragments. The fragment patterns resulting from proteolysis of mAb 64D1-CRP and cAMP-CRP differ indicating that the CRP in each complex is in a different conformation. The data presented indicate that the preferred conformation of the antigenic site for mAb 64D1 is present in unliganded CRP. Binding of mAb 64D1 to CRP is inhibited at high cAMP concentration. Formation of a stable cAMP-CRP-lac P+-RNA polymerase open promoter complex resistant to dissociation by mAb 64D1 occurs at a much lower cAMP concentration. The observed increase in resistance to mAb 64D1 may reflect a possible conformational change in CRP effected by contact with RNA polymerase in the open promoter complex.     

The dependence of Escherichia coli asparaginase II formation on cyclic AMP and cyclic AMP receptor protein.

The amount of asparaginase II in an Escherichia coli wild-type strain (cya+, crp+) markedly increased upon a shift from aerobic to anaerobic growth. However, no such increase occurred in a mutant (cya) lacking cyclic AMP synthesis unless supplemented with exogenous cyclic AMP. Since a mutant (crp) deficient in cyclic AMP receptor protein also did not support the anaerobic formation of this enzyme, it is concluded that the formation of E. coli asparaginase II depends on both cyclic AMP and cyclic AMP receptor protein.     

In vitro interaction of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein with the lactose repressor

Sedimentation equilibrium studies show that the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CAP) and lactose repressor associate to form a 2:1 complex in vitro. This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of a direct interaction of these proteins in the absence of DNA. No 1:1 complex was detected over a wide range of CAP concentrations, suggesting that binding is highly cooperative. Complex formation is stimulated by cAMP, with a net uptake of 1 equivalent of cAMP per molecule of CAP bound. Substitution of the dimeric lacI-18 mutant repressor for tetrameric wild-type repressor completely eliminates detectable binding. We therefore propose that CAP binds the cleft between dimeric units in the repressor tetramer. CAP-lac repressor interactions may play important roles in regulatory events that take place at overlapping CAP and repressor binding sites in the lactose promoter.     

Monoclonal antibodies that inhibit activation of transcription by the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein

The properties of the two monoclonal antibodies which were found to inhibit cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP)-stimulated abortive initiation without affecting cAMP binding (Li, X.-M., and Krakow, J. S. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 4378-4383) have been characterized. Binding of monoclonal antibody (mAb) 66C3 to CRP is stimulated by cAMP while CRP binding by mAb 63B2 is not affected by cAMP. Binding of cAMP-CRP-mAb 63B2 to the lac P+ DNA is completely inhibited. Whereas cAMP-CRP forms a stable complex only at the CRP site 1 of the lac P+ promoter fragment, cAMP-CRP-mAb 66C3 binds to both site 1 and site 2. DNase I footprinting using a HpaII fragment carrying only the lac site 2 does not show any protection by cAMP-CRP-mAb 66C3. With the lac L8UV5 promoter, binding is not seen at either the L8 site 1 or the unaltered site 2. In the presence of 25% glycerol, cAMP-CRP-mAb 66C3 binds to both L8 site 1 and site 2. RNA polymerase is unable to bind to the cAMP-CRP-mAb 66C3-lac P+ complex. In the presence of RNA polymerase, cAMP-CRP forms a stable complex at the L8 site 1, the subsequent addition of mAb 66C3 results in the release of CRP. The CRP present in the lac P+ open promoter complex is partially resistant to subsequent incubation with mAb 66C3. The results provide further evidence regarding possible contacts between CRP and RNA polymerase involved in establishing the open promoter complex.     

Binding of the cyclic AMP receptor protein of Escherichia coli to RNA polymerase.

Fluorescence polarization studies were used to study the interaction of a fluorescein-labelled conjugate of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (F-CRP) and RNA polymerase. Under conditions of physiological ionic strength, F-CRP binds to RNA polymerase holoenzyme in a cyclic AMP-dependent manner; the dissociation constant was about 3 microM in the presence of cyclic AMP and about 100 microM in its absence. Binding to core RNA polymerase under the same conditions was weak (Kdiss. approx. 80-100 microM) and independent of cyclic AMP. Competition experiments established that native CRP and F-CRP compete for the same binding site on RNA polymerase holoenzyme and that the native protein binds about 3 times more strongly than does F-CRP. Analytical ultracentrifuge studies showed that CRP binds predominantly to the monomeric rather than the dimeric form of RNA polymerase.     

Cyclic AMP-mediated intersubunit disulfide crosslinking of the cyclic AMP receptor protein of Escherichia coli.

The protomeric form of the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) of Escherichia coli is composed of two identical subunits of molecular weight 22,500 and contains two buried and two available cysteine residues. Titration of the two available cysteines with DTNB⁴ eliminates cyclic AMP-dependent DNA binding activity which is regenerated by incubating the modified protein with β-mercaptoethanol. In the absence of cAMP, the formation of the TNB anion from DTNB and the incorporation of [¹⁴C]TNB into CRP are approximately stoichiometric. In the presence of cAMP, there is an increase in the rate of formation of the TNB anion while the incorporation of [¹⁴C]TNB into CRP is markedly inhibited. These observations are reconciled by the observation that cAMP induces DTNB-mediated disulfide crosslinking of the two available sulfhydryls to produce a species migrating as a 45,000 molecular weight subunit on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. A mechanism is suggested by which an intersubunit, intraprotomer disulfide bond is produced by secondary disulfide interchange after the incorporation of the initial TNB group. Based on the observation of cAMP-mediated disulfide crosslinking, the available cysteines of the DNA binding region are proposed to reside in close proximity as part of an antiparallel β-sheet structure formed by the two carboxyl proximal polypeptides when CRP is in the DNA binding conformation.     

Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein mutants provide evidence for ligand contacts important in activation.

The three-dimensional model of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) shows that several amino acids are involved as chemical contacts for binding cAMP. We have constructed and characterized mutants at four of these positions, E72, R82, S83, and R123. The mutations were made in wild-type crp as well as a cAMP-independent crp, crp*. The activities of the mutant proteins were characterized in vivo for their ability to activate the lac operon. These results provide genetic evidence to support that E72 and R82 are essential and S83 and R123 are important in the activation of CRP by cAMP.