Proteasome involvement in the degradation of the G(q) family of Galpha subunits

Metabolically unstable proteins are involved in a multitude of regulatory networks, including those that control cell signaling, the cell cycle and in many responses to physiological stress. In the present study, we have determined the stability and characterized the degradation process of some members of the G(q) class of heterotrimeric G proteins. Pulse-chase experiments in HEK293 cells indicated a rapid turnover of endogenously expressed Galpha(q) and overexpressed Galpha(q) and Galpha(16) subunits. Pretreatment with proteasome inhibitors attenuated the degradation of both G alpha subunits. In contrast, pretreatment of cells with inhibitors of lysosomal proteases and nonproteasomal cysteine proteases had very little effect on the stability of the proteins. Significantly, the turnover of these proteins is not affected by transient activation of their associated receptors. Fractionation studies showed that the rates of Galpha(q) and Galpha16 degradation are accelerated in the cytosol. In fact, we show that a mutant Galpha(q) which lacks its palmitoyl modification site, and which is localized almost entirely in the cytoplasm, has a marked increase in the rate of degradation. Taken together, these results suggest that the G(q) class proteins are degraded through the proteasome pathway and that cellular localization and/or other protein interactions determine their stability.     

Activation of RhoA by association of Galpha(13) with Dbl

RhoA is a small G protein that is implicated in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, gene expression, and cell cycle progression. It is activated by many agonists whose receptors are linked to heterotrimeric G proteins, but the mechanisms are incompletely understood. In this study, we show that the constitutively active alpha-subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein G(13) associated with the Rho family guanine nucleotide exchange factor Dbl in NIH 3T3 cells and that this resulted in activation of RhoA. This activation was not seen with wild-type Galpha(13) or if Dbl and active Galpha(13) were expressed separately and mixed. In contrast, coexpression of constitutively active Galpha(q) with Dbl did not lead to their association and caused a weak activation of RhoA that was no greater than that observed with wild-type Galpha(q). These findings illustrate that activated Galpha(13) and Dbl can associate in vivo and that this leads to Rho activation.     

Potent activation of RhoA by Galpha q and Gq-coupled receptors

Heterotrimeric G proteins of the G(i), G(s), and G(q) family control a wide array of physiological functions primarily by regulating the activity of key intracellular second messenger-generating systems. alpha subunits of the G(12) family, Galpha(12) and Galpha(13), however, can promote cellular responses that are independent of conventional second messengers but that result from the activation of small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family and their downstream targets. These findings led to the identification of a novel family of guanine-nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that provides a direct link between Galpha(12/13) and Rho stimulation. Recent observations suggest that many cellular responses elicited by Galpha(q) and its coupled receptors also require the functional activity of Rho. However, available evidence suggests that Galpha(q) may act on pathways downstream from Rho rather than by promoting Rho activation. These seemingly conflicting observations and the recent development of sensitive assays to assess the in vivo levels of active Rho prompted us to ask whether Galpha(q) and its coupled receptors can stimulate endogenous Rho. Here we show that the expression of activated forms of Galpha(q) and the stimulation of G(q)-coupled receptors or chimeric Galpha(q) molecules that respond to G(i)-linked receptors can promote a robust activation of endogenous Rho in HEK-293T cells. Interestingly, this response was not prevented by molecules interfering with the ability of Galpha(13) to stimulate its linked RhoGEFs, together suggesting the existence of a novel molecular mechanism by which Galpha(q) and the large family of G(q)-coupled receptors can regulate the activity of Rho and its downstream signaling pathways.     

ARF6 activation by Galpha q signaling: Galpha q forms molecular complexes with ARNO and ARF6

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are widely expressed hepta-helical receptors with tightly regulated pleiotropic effects. ADP-Ribosylation Factor 6 (ARF6) plays an important role in GPCR trafficking and is the subject of intense research. However, the mechanisms underlying activation and regulation of ARF6 by GPCRs are poorly characterized. Here we report that Galpha(q) signaling leads to the activation of ARF6. Stimulation of the TPbeta receptor triggered ARF6 activation which was completely inhibited by the RGS domain of GRK2 known to specifically bind and sequester Galpha(q). Co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed that ARNO (a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for ARF6) and ARF6 formed complexes preferentially with activated Galpha(q) compared to non-activated Galpha(q). Formation of the Galpha(q) complexes with ARNO and ARF6 was detected early and was optimal after 30 min of receptor stimulation corresponding with the profile of ARF6 activation. Interestingly, binding experiments using purified proteins showed that Galpha(q) interacted directly with ARNO. Galpha(q)-dependent TPbeta receptor-mediated activation of ARF6 resulted in phosphoinositol-4,5-bisphosphate production which was potently inhibited by dominant negative mutants of ARNO and ARF6. Furthermore, our data show that the expression of ARNO and ARF6 promoted, whereas dominant negative mutants of these proteins inhibited the internalization of the TPbeta receptor. This further elucidates our previous data on the PLCbeta- and PKC-independent mechanism involved in Galpha(q)-mediated internalization of the TPbeta receptor. Taken altogether, our results support a novel model where activated Galpha(q) forms molecular complexes with ARNO and ARF6, possibly through a direct interaction with ARNO, leading to ARF6 activation.     

Pasteurella multocida toxin-induced activation of RhoA is mediated via two families of G{alpha} proteins, G{alpha}q and G{alpha}12/13

Pasteurella multocida toxin (PMT) is a potent mitogen, which is known to activate phospholipase Cbeta by stimulating the alpha-subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein G(q). PMT also activates RhoA and RhoA-dependent pathways. Using YM-254890, a specific inhibitor of G(q/11), we studied whether activation of RhoA involves G proteins other than G(q/11). YM-254890 inhibited PMT or muscarinic M3-receptor-mediated stimulation of phospholipase Cbeta at similar concentrations in HEK293m3 cells. In these cells, PMT-induced RhoA activation and enhancement of RhoA-dependent luciferase activity were partially inhibited by YM-254890. In Galpha(q/11)-deficient fibroblasts, PMT induced activation of RhoA, increase in RhoA-dependent luciferase activity, and increase in ERK phosphorylation. None of these effects were influenced by YM-254890. However, RhoA activation by PMT was inhibited by RGS2, RGS16, lscRGS, and dominant negative G(13)(GA), indicating involvement of Galpha(12/13) in the PMT effect on RhoA. In Galpha(12/13) gene-deficient cells, PMT-induced stimulation of RhoA, luciferase activity, and ERK phosphorylation were blocked by YM-254890, indicating the involvement of G(q). Infection with a virus harboring the gene of Galpha(13) reconstituted the increase in RhoA-dependent luciferase activity by PMT even in the presence of YM-254890. The data show that YM-254890 is able to block PMT activation of Galpha(q) and indicate that, in addition to Galpha(q), the Galpha(12/13) G proteins are targets of PMT.     

Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) interact with Ser/Thr protein phosphatase type 5 and stimulate its phosphatase activity

The Galpha subunits of the G(12) family of heterotrimeric G proteins, defined by Galpha(12) and Galpha(13), are involved in many signaling pathways and diverse cellular functions. In an attempt to elucidate downstream effectors of Galpha(12) for cellular functions, we have performed a yeast two-hybrid screening of a rat brain cDNA library and revealed that Ser/Thr protein phosphatase type 5 (PP5) is a novel effector of Galpha(12) and Galpha(13). PP5 is a newly identified phosphatase and consists of a C-terminal catalytic domain and an N-terminal regulatory tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain [2]. Arachidonic acid was recently shown to activate PP5 phosphatase activity by binding to its TPR domain, however the precise regulatory mechanism of PP5 phosphatase activity is not fully determined. In this study, we show that active forms of Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) specifically interact with PP5 through its TPR domain and activate its phosphatase activity about 2.5-fold. Active forms of Galpha(12) and Galpha(13) also enhance the arachidonic acid-stimulated PP5 phosphatase activity about 2.5-fold. Moreover, we demonstrate that the active form of Galpha(12) translocates PP5 to the cell periphery and colocalizes with PP5. These results propose a new signaling pathway of G(12) family G proteins.     

G protein-coupled receptor Kinase 2/G alpha q/11 interaction. A novel surface on a regulator of G protein signaling homology domain for binding G alpha subunits

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce cellular signals from hormones, neurotransmitters, light, and odorants by activating heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding (G) proteins. For many GPCRs, short term regulation is initiated by agonist-dependent phosphorylation by GPCR kinases (GRKs), such as GRK2, resulting in G protein/receptor uncoupling. GRK2 also regulates signaling by binding G alpha(q/ll) and inhibiting G alpha(q) stimulation of the effector phospholipase C beta. The binding site for G alpha(q/ll) resides within the amino-terminal domain of GRK2, which is homologous to the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) family of proteins. To map the Galpha(q/ll) binding site on GRK2, we carried out site-directed mutagenesis of the RGS homology (RH) domain and identified eight residues, which when mutated, alter binding to G alpha(q/ll). These mutations do not alter the ability of full-length GRK2 to phosphorylate rhodopsin, an activity that also requires the amino-terminal domain. Mutations causing G alpha(q/ll) binding defects impair recruitment to the plasma membrane by activated G alpha(q) and regulation of G alpha(q)-stimulated phospholipase C beta activity when introduced into full-length GRK2. Two different protein interaction sites have previously been identified on RH domains. The G alpha binding sites on RGS4 and RGS9, called the "A" site, is localized to the loops between helices alpha 3 and alpha 4, alpha 5 and alpha 6, and alpha 7 and alpha 8. The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) binding site of axin involves residues on alpha helices 3, 4, and 5 (the "B" site) of its RH domain. We demonstrate that the G alpha(q/ll) binding site on the GRK2 RH domain is distinct from the "A" and "B" sites and maps primarily to the COOH terminus of its alpha 5 helix. We suggest that this novel protein interaction site on an RH domain be designated the "C" site.     

Selective regulation of Galpha(q/11) by an RGS domain in the G protein-coupled receptor kinase, GRK2

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are well characterized regulators of G protein-coupled receptors, whereas regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins directly control the activity of G protein alpha subunits. Interestingly, a recent report (Siderovski, D. P., Hessel, A., Chung, S., Mak, T. W., and Tyers, M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 211-212) identified a region within the N terminus of GRKs that contained homology to RGS domains. Given that RGS domains demonstrate AlF(4)(-)-dependent binding to G protein alpha subunits, we tested the ability of G proteins from a crude bovine brain extract to bind to GRK affinity columns in the absence or presence of AlF(4)(-). This revealed the specific ability of bovine brain Galpha(q/11) to bind to both GRK2 and GRK3 in an AlF(4)(-)-dependent manner. In contrast, Galpha(s), Galpha(i), and Galpha(12/13) did not bind to GRK2 or GRK3 despite their presence in the extract. Additional studies revealed that bovine brain Galpha(q/11) could also bind to an N-terminal construct of GRK2, while no binding of Galpha(q/11), Galpha(s), Galpha(i), or Galpha(12/13) to comparable constructs of GRK5 or GRK6 was observed. Experiments using purified Galpha(q) revealed significant binding of both Galpha(q) GDP/AlF(4)(-) and Galpha(q)(GTPgammaS), but not Galpha(q)(GDP), to GRK2. Activation-dependent binding was also observed in both COS-1 and HEK293 cells as GRK2 significantly co-immunoprecipitated constitutively active Galpha(q)(R183C) but not wild type Galpha(q). In vitro analysis revealed that GRK2 possesses weak GAP activity toward Galpha(q) that is dependent on the presence of a G protein-coupled receptor. However, GRK2 effectively inhibited Galpha(q)-mediated activation of phospholipase C-beta both in vitro and in cells, possibly through sequestration of activated Galpha(q). These data suggest that a subfamily of the GRKs may be bifunctional regulators of G protein-coupled receptor signaling operating directly on both receptors and G proteins.     

PLC-epsilon: a shared effector protein in Ras-, Rho-, and G alpha beta gamma-mediated signaling

The conceptual segregation of G protein-stimulated cell signaling responses into those mediated by heterotrimeric G proteins versus those promoted by small GTPases of the Ras superfamily is no longer vogue. PLC-epsilon, an isozyme of the phospholipase C (PLC) family, has been identified recently and dramatically extends our understanding of the crosstalk that occurs between heterotrimeric and small monomeric GTPases. Like the widely studied PLC-beta isozymes, PLC-epsilon is activated by Gbetagamma released upon activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. However, PLC-epsilon markedly differs from the PLC-beta isozymes in its capacity for activation by Galpha(12/13) - but not Galpha(q) -coupled receptors. PLC-epsilon contains two Ras-associating domains located near the C terminus, and H-Ras regulates PLC-epsilon as a downstream effector. Rho also activates PLC-epsilon, but in a mechanism independent of the C-terminal Ras-associating domains. Therefore, Ca(2+) mobilization and activation of protein kinase C are signaling responses associated with activation of both H-Ras and Rho. A guanine nucleotide exchange domain conserved in the N terminus of PLC-epsilon potentially confers a capacity for activators of this isozyme to cast signals into additional signaling pathways mediated by GTPases of the Ras superfamily. Thus, PLC-epsilon is a multifunctional nexus protein that senses and mediates crosstalk between heterotrimeric and small GTPase signaling pathways.     

Differential involvement of Galpha12 and Galpha13 in receptor-mediated stress fiber formation.

The ubiquitously expressed heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) G12 and G13 have been shown to activate the small GTPase Rho. Rho stimulation leads to a rapid remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton and subsequent stress fiber formation. We investigated the involvement of G12 or G13 in stress fiber formation induced through a variety of Gq/G11-coupled receptors. Using fibroblast cell lines derived from wild-type and Galphaq/Galpha11-deficient mice, we show that agonist-dependent activation of the endogenous receptors for thrombin or lysophosphatidic acid and of the heterologously expressed bradykinin B2, vasopressin V1A, endothelin ETA, and serotonin 5-HT2C receptors induced stress fiber formation in either the presence or absence of Galphaq/Galpha11. Stress fiber assembly induced through the muscarinic M1 and the metabotropic glutamate subtype 1alpha receptors was dependent on Gq/G11 proteins. The activation of the Gq/G11-coupled endothelin ETB and angiotensin AT1A receptors failed to induce stress fiber formation. Lysophosphatidic acid, B2, and 5-HT2C receptor-mediated stress fiber formation was dependent on Galpha13 and involved epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors, whereas thrombin, ETA, and V1A receptors induced stress fiber accumulation via Galpha12 in an EGF receptor-independent manner. Our data demonstrate that many Gq/G11-coupled receptors induce stress fiber assembly in the absence of Galphaq and Galpha11 and that this involves either a Galpha12 or a Galpha13/EGF receptor-mediated pathway.     

Use of Caenorhabditis elegans G{alpha}q chimeras to detect G-protein-coupled receptor signals

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate heterotrimeric G-proteins (G(i)-, G(s)-, G(q)-, or G(12)-like) to generate specific intracellular responses, depending on the receptor/G-protein coupling. The aim was to enable a majority of GPCRs to generate a predetermined output by signaling through a single G-protein-supported pathway. The authors focused on calcium responses as the output, then engineered Galpha(q) to promote promiscuous receptor interactions. Starting with a human Galpha(q) containing 5 Galpha(z) residues in the C-terminal receptor recognition domain (hGalpha(q/z5)), they evaluated agonist-stimulated calcium responses for 33 diverse GPCRs (G(i)-, G(s)-, and G(q)-coupled) and found 20 of 33 responders. In parallel, they tested Caenorhabditis elegans Galpha(q) containing 5 or 9 C-terminal Galpha(z) residues (cGalpha(q/z5), cGalpha(q/z9)). Signal detection was enhanced with cGalpha(q/z5) and cGalpha(q/z9) (yielding 25/33 and 26/33 responders, respectively). In a separate study of Galpha(s)-coupled receptors, the authors compared hGalpha(q/s5) versus hGalpha(q/s9), cGalpha(q/s9), andcGalphaq/s21 and observed optimal function with cGalpha(q/s9). Cotransfection of an engineered Galpha(q) "cocktail" (cGalpha(q/z5) plus cGalpha(q/s9)) provided a powerful and efficient screening platform. When the chimeras included N-terminal myristoylation sites (to promote membrane localization), calcium responses were sustained or improved, depending on the receptor. This approach toward a "universal functional assay" is particularly useful for orphan GPCRs whose signaling pathways are unknown.     

Involvement of both G(q/11) and G(s) proteins in gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor-mediated signaling in L beta T2 cells

The hypothalamic hormone gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates the synthesis and release of the pituitary gonadotropins. GnRH acts through a plasma membrane receptor that is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. These receptors interact with heterotrimeric G proteins to initiate downstream signaling. In this study, we have investigated which G proteins are involved in GnRH receptor-mediated signaling in L beta T2 pituitary gonadotrope cells. We have shown previously that GnRH activates ERK and induces the c-fos and LH beta genes in these cells. Signaling via the G(i) subfamily of G proteins was excluded, as neither ERK activation nor c-Fos and LH beta induction was impaired by treatment with pertussis toxin or a cell-permeable peptide that sequesters G beta gamma-subunits. GnRH signaling was partially mimicked by adenoviral expression of a constitutively active mutant of G alpha(q) (Q209L) and was blocked by a cell-permeable peptide that uncouples G alpha(q) from GPCRs. Furthermore, chronic activation of G alpha(q) signaling induced a state of GnRH resistance. A cell-permeable peptide that uncouples G alpha(s) from receptors was also able to inhibit ERK, c-Fos, and LH beta, indicating that both G(q/11) and G(s) proteins are involved in signaling. Consistent with this, GnRH caused GTP loading on G(s) and G(q/11) and increased intracellular cAMP. Artificial elevation of cAMP with forskolin activated ERK and caused a partial induction of c-Fos. Finally, treatment of G alpha(q) (Q209L)-infected cells with forskolin enhanced the induction of c-Fos showing that the two pathways are independent and additive. Taken together, these results indicate that the GnRH receptor activates both G(q) and G(s) signaling to regulate gene expression in L beta T2 cells.     

Specificity of Gbetagamma signaling to Kir3 channels depends on the helical domain of pertussis toxin-sensitive Galpha subunits

Acetylcholine signaling through muscarinic type 2 receptors activates atrial G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (Kir3) channels via the betagamma subunits of G proteins (Gbetagamma). Different combinations of recombinant Gbetagamma subunits have been shown to activate Kir3 channels in a similar manner. In native systems, however, only Gbetagamma subunits associated with the pertussis toxin-sensitive Galpha(i/o) subunits signal to K(+) channels. Additionally, in vitro binding experiments supported the notion that the C terminus of Kir3 channels interacts preferentially with Galpha(i) over Galpha(q). In this study we confirmed in two heterologous expression systems a preference of Galpha(i) over Galpha(q) in the activation of K(+) currents. To identify determinants of Gbetagamma signaling specificity, we first exchanged domains of Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) subunits responsible for receptor coupling selectivity and swapped their receptor coupling partners. Our results established that the G proteins, regardless of the receptor type to which they coupled, conferred specificity to Kir3 activation. We next tested signaling through chimeras between the Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) subunits in which the N terminus, the helical, or the GTPase domains of the Galpha subunits were exchanged. Our results revealed that the helical domain of Galpha(i) (residues 63-175) in the background of Galpha(q) could support Kir3 activation, whereas the reverse chimera could not. Moreover, the helical domain of the Galpha(i) subunit conferred "Galpha(i)-like" binding of the Kir3 C terminus to the Galpha(q) subunits that contained it. These results implicate the helical domain of Galpha(i) proteins as a critical determinant of Gbetagamma signaling specificity.     

Characteristic defects in neural crest cell-specific Galphaq/Galpha11- and Galpha12/Galpha13-deficient mice

The endothelin/endothelin receptor system plays a critical role in the differentiation and terminal migration of particular neural crest cell subpopulations. Targeted deletion of the G-protein-coupled endothelin receptors ET(A) and ET(B) was shown to result in characteristic developmental defects of derivatives of cephalic and cardiac neural crest and of neural crest-derived melanocytes and enteric neurons, respectively. Since both endothelin receptors are coupled to G-proteins of the G(q)/G(11)- and G(12)/G(13)-families, we generated mouse lines lacking Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) or Galpha(12)/Galpha(13) in neural crest cells to study their roles in neural crest development. Mice lacking Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) in a neural crest cell-specific manner had craniofacial defects similar to those observed in mice lacking the ET(A) receptor or endothelin-1 (ET-1). However, in contrast to ET-1/ET(A) mutant animals, cardiac outflow tract morphology was intact. Surprisingly, neither Galpha(q)/Galpha(11)- nor Galpha(12)/Galpha(13)-deficient mice showed developmental defects seen in animals lacking either the ET(B) receptor or its ligand endothelin-3 (ET-3). Interestingly, Galpha(12)/Galpha(13) deficiency in neural crest cell-derived cardiac cells resulted in characteristic cardiac malformations. Our data show that G(q)/G(11)- but not G(12)/G(13)-mediated signaling processes mediate ET-1/ET(A)-dependent development of the cephalic neural crest. In contrast, ET-3/ET(B)-mediated development of neural crest-derived melanocytes and enteric neurons appears to involve G-proteins different from G(q)/G(11)/G(12)/G(13).     

Endogenous RGS protein action modulates mu-opioid signaling through Galphao. Effects on adenylyl cyclase,extracellular signal-regulated kinases,and intracellular calcium pathways

RGS (regulators of G protein signaling) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins for the Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins and act to regulate signaling by rapidly cycling G protein. RGS proteins may integrate receptors and signaling pathways by physical or kinetic scaffolding mechanisms. To determine whether this results in enhancement and/or selectivity of agonist signaling, we have prepared C6 cells stably expressing the mu-opioid receptor and either pertussis toxin-insensitive or RGS- and pertussis toxin-insensitive Galpha(o). We have compared the activation of G protein, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, stimulation of intracellular calcium release, and activation of the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway between cells expressing mutant Galpha(o) that is either RGS-insensitive or RGS-sensitive. The mu-receptor agonist [d-Ala(2),MePhe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin and partial agonist morphine were much more potent and/or had an increased maximal effect in inhibiting adenylyl cyclase and in activating MAPK in cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o). In contrast, mu-opioid agonist increases in intracellular calcium were less affected. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the GTPase-activating protein activity of RGS proteins provides a control that limits agonist action through effector pathways and may contribute to selectivity of activation of intracellular signaling pathways.     

Activation of Galpha (i) and subsequent uncoupling of receptor-Galpha(i) signaling by Pasteurella multocida toxin

Bacterial protein toxins are powerful tools for elucidating signaling mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. A number of bacterial protein toxins, e.g. cholera toxin, pertussis toxin (PTx), or Pasteurella multocida toxin (PMT), target heterotrimeric G proteins and have been used to stimulate or block specific signaling pathways or to demonstrate the contribution of their target proteins in cellular effects. PMT is a major virulence factor of P. multocida causing pasteurellosis in man and animals and is responsible for atrophic rhinitis in pigs. PMT modulates various signaling pathways, including phospholipase Cbeta and RhoA, by acting on the heterotrimeric G proteins Galpha(q) and Galpha(12/13), respectively. Here we report that PMT is a powerful activator of G(i) protein. We show that PMT decreases basal isoproterenol and forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in intact Swiss 3T3 cells, inhibits adenylyl cyclase activity in cell membrane preparations, and enhances the inhibition of cAMP accumulation caused by lysophosphatidic acid via endothelial differentiation gene receptors. PMT-mediated inhibition of cAMP production is independent of toxin activation of Galpha(q) and/or Galpha(12/13). Although the effects of PMT are not inhibited by PTx, PMT blocks PTx-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of G(i). PMT also inhibits steady-state GTPase activity and GTP binding of G(i) in Swiss 3T3 cell membranes stimulated by lysophosphatidic acid. The data indicate that PMT is a novel activator of G(i), modulating its GTPase activity and converting it into a PTx-insensitive state.     

Human cytomegalovirus-encoded G protein-coupled receptor US28 mediates smooth muscle cell migration through Galpha12

Coupling of G proteins to ligand-engaged chemokine receptors is the paramount event in G-protein-coupled receptor signal transduction. Previously, we have demonstrated that the human cytomegalovirus-encoded chemokine receptor US28 mediates human vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) migration in response to either RANTES or monocyte chemoattractant protein 1. In this report, we identify the G proteins that couple with US28 to promote vascular SMC migration and identify other signaling molecules that play critical roles in this process. US28-mediated cellular migration was enhanced with the expression of the G-protein subunits Galpha12 and Galpha13, suggesting that US28 may functionally couple to these G proteins. In correlation with this observation, US28 was able to activate RhoA, a downstream effector of Galpha12 and Galpha13 in cell types with these G proteins but not in those without them and activation of RhoA was dependent on US28 stimulation with RANTES. In addition, inactivation of RhoA or the RhoA-associated kinase p160ROCK with a dominant-negative mutant of RhoA or the small molecule inhibitor Y27632, respectively, abrogated US28-induced SMC migration. The data presented here suggest that US28 functionally signals through Galpha12 family G proteins and RhoA in a ligand-dependent manner and these signaling molecules are important for the ability of US28 to induce cellular migration.