ECOLOGY AND MORPHOLOGY OF RECENT CORAL REEFS

1. The classical ‘coral reef problem’ concerned the geological relationships of reefs as major topographical features; modern coral studies consider reefs both as complex biological systems of high productivity and as geological structures forming a framework for and being modified by coral growth. 2. Deep borings in reefs have conclusively confirmed the general arguments of Darwin, that oceanic reefs developed by progressive subsidence of their foundations. Darwin failed to take account of Pleistocene changes in sea level and their effect on the present surface features of reefs. Daly's alternative ‘glacial control theory’ was based on false assumptions concerning marine erosion rates during glacial periods, but if sea level during the Holocene was higher than at present, as Daly also supposed, the effects on reef features would be profound. 3. Reefs are complex biological systems in tropical seas, dominated by scleractinian corals. Coral faunas are larger and more diverse in the Indo-Pacific than in the Atlantic. Hermatypic corals are restricted to shallow water by the light requirements of their symbiotic algae, but temperature is a major control of worldwide distributions. Temperature, salinity and sediment tolerances of corals are wider than formerly supposed, and corals can survive brief emersion except when it coincides with heavy rainfall. Water turbulence is an important ecological control, but difficult to measure. 4. The trophic status of corals is still unclear, but in spite of their anatomical and physiological specialization as carnivores it is likely that they derive some nutrient substances from zooxanthellae. Suggestions that filamentous algae in coral heads play a major part in the economy of the corals have not been supported by later work, but biomass pyramids constructed on the basis by Odum and Odum remain the only ones available. Most reefs are apparently autotrophic, with 1500–3500 g. Carbon being fixed per m.² per year. 5. Few animals eat corals, which may account for their success. Important predators are fish and the echinoderm Acanthaster. Quantitative estimates of biogenic erosion of organic skeletons on reefs are high. Fish affect not only corals but other invertebrates, algae and marine phanerogams. 6. Corals may be killed by ‘dark water’, intense rain or river floodwaters, earth movements, human interference and especially hurricanes. Reef recovery after hurricanes may take 10–20 years. 7. In addition to fringing, barrier and atoll reefs, intermediate types are recognised. The main types may consist of linear reefs or faros. Smaller lagoon reefs include pinnacles, patches and platforms, and submerged knolls. Complex cellular or mesh reef patterns are also found. 8. Reefs are conspicuously zoned, both laterally in response to changing exposure to waves to form windward and leeward reefs, and transversely, as a result of steep environmental gradients across reef flats from sea to lagoon. Topographic and ecological zones may be characterized by particular coral species, but these vary widely from reef to reef. A major distinction can be made between reefs with and without algal ridges, which are common on open-ocean trade-wind reefs, in the Indo-Pacific, but are absent on Caribbean reefs and on Indo-Pacific reefs in more sheltered waters. gorgonians are common on Caribbean reefs, alcyonaceans in the Indo-Pacific. 9. Much of the difficulty in comparing reefs stems from the lack of uniformity in surveying methods. Problems of describing the complex three-dimensional patterns of organisms on reefs have yet to be solved, and hence little progress has been made in explanation of these patterns. Explanation in terms of simple environmental controls is inadequate. 10. Understanding the distribution of corals is made more difficult both by taxo-nomic problems and by the plasticity of growth form in different situations. 11. Growth of corals and reefs may be estimated by measuring the growth of individual colonies, measuring rates of calcium carbonate deposition in the skeleton, measuring topographic change on the reef and deducing net rates of reef growth from geological evidence. Massive corals may increase in diameter by 1 cm./year, branches of branching corals may increase in length by 10 cm./year. Study of deposition rates shows variation within colonies, between species, in light and dark, and seasonally. Rates of reef growth extrapolated from colony measurements reach 2–5 cm./year, and contrast with figures as low as 0–02 cm/year averaged over 70 million years from borehole data. Both colony growth rates and geological data suggest worldwide variations in rates of reef growth. 12. In spite of clear evidence of long-continued subsidence, present surface features of reefs, often only thinly veneered by modern corals, have been much affected by recent sea level fluctuations. Many slightly raised reefs at 2–10 m. above sea level date at 90–160 thousand years B.P.; there is evidence for a sea level at about the present level at 30–35 thousand years B.P.; and controversy continues over whether sea level has stood higher than the present at any time since the last sea level rise began about 20,000 years ago. Evidence from many reefs suggests a slightly higher sea level in the last 4000 years, but on other reefs such evidence is lacking. 13. Several reef features (submerged terraces, groove-spur systems, algal ridge, reef flat, reef blocks and reef islands) have been interpreted either as relict features dating from a higher sea level in the last 5000 years, or contemporary features developed in response to present processes. In some cases the evidence is equivocal; in others it is clear that diverse features are being grouped together under the same name. If such features are referable to a higher sea level, this may have been of last Interglacial or even Interstadial age rather than Holocene. 14. A reef consists of a rigid framework defining several major depositional environments within and around it. Sediments are of biological, mainly skeletal origin, except in unusual environments such as the Bahama Banks. The characteristics of sediments derived from organisms depend partly on the breakdown patterns of particular skeletons, partly on transportation and sorting processes. Fine sediments may be either detrital, or physicochemical precipitates. 15. Organisms affect sediments after deposition, by disturbance, transportation and probably comminution. Fish and holothurians have been studied in detail. 16. While new theories of coral reefs are proposed from time to time, the need is less for new theories than for standardised procedures to ensure comparability of reef studies and the identification of variations in reefs both on local and regional scales. While reefs as biological systems adjust relatively rapidly to changes, reefs as geological systems adjust much more slowly. Because of the magnitude and recency of Pleistocene fluctuations in sea level, many biological features of reefs are out of phase with inherited geological features, and this had led to much controversy.     

Pleistocene reef environments, constituent grains, and coral community structure: Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles

We investigated the degree to which component grains vary with depositional environment in sediments from three reef habitats from the Pleistocene (125?ka) Hato Unit of the Lower Terrace, Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles: windward reef crest, windward back reef, and leeward reef crest. The windward reef crest sediment is the most distinctive, dominated by fragments of encrusting and branching coralline red algae, coral fragments and the encrusting foraminiferan Carpenteria sp. Windward back reef and leeward reef crest sediments are more similar compositionally, only showing significant differences in relative abundance of coral fragments and Homotrema rubrum. Although lacking high taxonomic resolution and subject to modification by transport, relative abundance of constituent grain types offers a way of assessing ancient skeletal reef community composition, and one which is not limited to a single taxonomic group. The strong correlation between grain type and environment we found in the Pleistocene of Curaçao suggests that constituent grain analysis may be an effective tool in delineating Pleistocene Caribbean reef environments. However, it will not be a sufficient indicator where communities vary significantly within reef environments or where evolutionary and/or biogeographical processes lead to different relationships between community composition and reef environment. Detailed interpretation of geological, biological, and physical characteristics of the Pleistocene reefs of Curaçao reveals that the abundance of the single coral species, Acropora palmata, is not a good predictor of the ecological structure of the ancient reef coral communities. This coral was the predominant species in two of the three reef habitats (windward and leeward reef crest), but the taxonomic composition (based on species relative abundance data) of the reef coral communities was substantially different in these two environments. We conclude that qualitative estimates of coral distribution patterns (presence of a key coral species or the use of a distinctive coral skeletal architecture), when used as a component in a multi-component analysis of ancient reef environments, probably introduces minimal circular reasoning into quantitative paleoecological studies of reef coral community structure.     

How corals made rocks through the ages

Hard, or stony, corals make rocks that can, on geological time scales, lead to the formation of massive reefs in shallow tropical and subtropical seas. In both historical and contemporary oceans, reef‐building corals retain information about the marine environment in their skeletons, which is an organic–inorganic composite material. The elemental and isotopic composition of their skeletons is frequently used to reconstruct the environmental history of Earth's oceans over time, including temperature, pH, and salinity. Interpretation of this information requires knowledge of how the organisms formed their skeletons. The basic mechanism of formation of calcium carbonate skeleton in stony corals has been studied for decades. While some researchers consider coral skeletons as mainly passive recorders of ocean conditions, it has become increasingly clear that biological processes play key roles in the biomineralization mechanism. Understanding the role of the animal in living stony coral biomineralization and how it evolved has profound implications for interpreting environmental signatures in fossil corals to understand past ocean conditions. Here we review historical hypotheses and discuss the present understanding of how corals evolved and how their skeletons changed over geological time. We specifically explain how biological processes, particularly those occurring at the subcellular level, critically control the formation of calcium carbonate structures. We examine the different models that address the current debate including the tissue–skeleton interface, skeletal organic matrix, and biomineralization pathways. Finally, we consider how understanding the biological control of coral biomineralization is critical to informing future models of coral vulnerability to inevitable global change, particularly increasing ocean acidification.     

Coral growth and reef growth: a brief review

The growth potential of modern zooxanthellate corals from the major reef provinces is reviewed with respect to Holocene reef growth. Both coral growth and reef growth is enhanced globally at the beginning of the Holocene and is maintained regionally in the Caribbean Sea up to the present in contrast to reefs of the Indo-Pacific Ocean. This regional difference is mainly caused by the siphoning effect of the tropical Atlantic, which is characterised still by a rising sea level in contrast to global ocean. Hence, Indo-Pacific reefs exhibit a well-cemented reef crest and reef roof barren of living corals. The evaluation of reef growth rates throughout the Phanerozoic shows reduced growth rates of more than one order of magnitude in comparison to their modern counterparts. This is a result of compaction and diagenesis but also strongly biased by uncertainties in absolute dating. Point counting of individual framebuilders with known growth rate may result in more comparative figures for growth rates of fossil reefs with respect to modern ones.     

Upper Permian coral reef and colonial rugose corals in northwest Hunan, South China

Summary The roles of Permian colonial corals in forming organic reefs have not been adequately assessed, although they are common fossils in the Permian strata. It is now known that colonial corals were important contributors to reef framework during the middle and late Permian such as those in South China, northeast Japan, Oman and Thailand. A coral reef occurs in Kanjia-ping, Cili County, Hunan, South China. It is formed by erect and unscathed colonies ofWaagenophyllum growing on top of one anotherin situ to form a baffle and framework. Paleontological data of the Cili coral reef indicates a middle to late Changhsing age (Late Permian), corresponding to thePalaeofusulina zone. The coral reef exposure extends along the inner platform margin striking in E-S direction for nearly 4 km laterally and generally 35 to 57 m thick. The Cili coral reef exhibits a lateral differentiation into three main reef facies; reef core facies, fore-reef facies, and marginal slope facies. The major reef-core facies is well exposed in Shenxian-wan and Guanyin-an sections where it rests on the marginal slope facies. Colonial corals are dispersed and preserved in non-living position easward. Sponges become major stabilizing organisms in the eastern part of Changhsing limestone outcrop in Kanjia-ping, but no read sponge reefs were formed. Coral reefs at Cili County in Human are different distinctly from calcisponge reefs in South China in their palaeogeography, lithofacies development, organic constitutuents, palaeoecology and diagenesis. The Cili coral reef also shows differences in age, depositional facies association, reef organisms and diagenesis from coral reefs in South Kitakami of Japan, Khorat Plateau of Thailand, and Saih Hatat of Oman. Although some sponge reefs and mounds can reach up to the unconformable Permian/Triassic boundary, coral reef at Kanjia-ping, Cili County, is the latest Permian reef known. This reef appears to had been formed in a palaeoenvironment that is different from that of the sponge reefs and provides an example of new and unique Permian reef type in South China, and could help us to: 1) understand the significance of colonial corals in Permian carbonate buildups; 2) evaluate the importance of coral community evolution prior to the collapse of reef ecosystems at the Permian/Triassic boundary; 3) better understand the effects of the biotic extinction events in Palaeotethys realm; 4) look for environmental factors that may have controlled reefs through time and space, and 5) provide valuable data for the study of Permian palaeoclimate and global evolutionary changes of Permian reefs and reef community.     

Carbonic anhydrases in anthozoan corals—A review

Coral reefs are among the most biologically diverse and economically important ecosystems on the planet. The deposition of massive calcium carbonate skeletons (biomineralization or calcification) by scleractinian corals forms the coral reef framework/architecture that serves as habitat for a large diversity of organisms. This process would not be possible without the intimate symbiosis between corals and photosynthetic dinoflagellates, commonly called zooxanthellae. Carbonic anhydrases play major roles in those two essential processes of coral’s physiology: they are involved in the carbon supply for calcium carbonate precipitation as well as in carbon-concentrating mechanisms for symbiont photosynthesis. Here, we review the current understanding of diversity and function of carbonic anhydrases in corals and discuss the perspective of theses enzymes as a key to understanding impacts of environmental changes on coral reefs.     

Sedimentation on three caribbean atolls: Glovers reef,lighthouse reef and turneffe Islands,belize

Summary The chief mode of carbonate sedimentation on the Belizean atolls Glovers Reef, Lighthouse Reef and Turneffe Islands is the accumulation of organically-derived particles. Variations in the distribution of the composition and grain-sizes of surface sediments, collected along transects across the atolls, are environmentally controlled. Two major sediment types may be distinguished. (1) Reef and fore reef sediments are dominated by fragments of coral, coralline algae andHalimeda. Mean grain-sizes range from 1–2 mm. (2) Back reef sediments contain more mollusk fragments, more fine-grained sediment (<125 μm) and appear to have fewerHalimeda fragments. In addition, sediments from inner platforms and shallow lagoonal parts of Glovers and Lighthouse Reefs comprise non-skeletal grains, namely fecal pellets. Sediments from lagoonal patch reefs may contain up to 20% coral fragments. Mean grain-sizes range from 0.1–1 mm and are finest on the inner platform and lagoon floor of the back reef environment. Within the reef and fore reef environments, it is not possible to distinguish sub-environments on the basis of textural and compositional differences of the sediments. Sediments from patch reefs contrast with those from back reef lagoons and inner platforms and are similar in terms of grain-sizes and compositions to reef and fore reef surface sediments. Non-skeletal grains forming in shallow parts of the back reef in Glovers and Lighthouse Reefs are interpreted to be indurated by interstitial precipitation of calcium carbonate from warm, supersaturated water flushing the sediment. The lack of hardened non-skeletal particles in the back reef sediments of Turneffe Islands is most probably due to the abundance of muddy, organic-rich sediment in the well-protected lagoon. Fine sediment is less permeable and organic films prevent cement overgrowth on particles.     

Coral recruitment and juvenile mortality as structuring factors for reef benthic communities in Biscayne National Park, USA

Coral communities of Biscayne National Park (BNP) on offshore linear bank-barrier reefs are depauperate of reef corals and have little topographic relief, while those on lagoonal patch reefs have greater coral cover and species richness despite presumably more stressful environmental regimes closer to shore. We hypothesized that differences in rates of coral recruitment and/or of coral survivorship were responsible for these differences in community structure. These processes were investigated by measuring: (1) juvenile and adult coral densities, and (2) size-frequency distributions of smaller coral size classes, at three pairs of bank- and patch-reefs distributed along the north-south range of coral reefs within the Park. In addition, small quadrats (0.25 m²) were censused for colonies <2 cm in size on three reefs (one offshore and one patch reef in the central park, and one intermediate reef at the southern end), and re-surveyed after 1 year. Density and size frequency data confirmed that large coral colonies were virtually absent from the offshore reefs, but showed that juvenile corals were common and had similar densities to those of adjacent bank and patch reefs. Large coral colonies were more common on inshore patch reefs, suggesting lower survivorship (higher mortality) of small and intermediate sized colonies on the offshore reefs. The more limited small-quadrat data showed similar survivorship rates and initial and final juvenile densities at all three sites, but a higher influx of new recruits to the patch reef site during the single annual study period. We consider the size-frequency data to be a better indicator of juvenile coral dynamics, since it is a more time-integrated measurement and was replicated at more sites. We conclude that lack of recruitment does not appear to explain the impoverished coral communities on offshore bank reefs in BNP. Instead, higher juvenile coral mortality appears to be a dominant factor structuring these communities. Accepted: 9 September 1999     

PROCESSES OF ORGANIC PRODUCTION ON CORAL REEFS

1. The first quantitative studies of production on coral reefs were those of Sargent & Austin who showed that productivity on reefs was considerably higher than in surrounding waters. This high production occurred in spite of nutrient limitation and low productivity of offshore waters. Their conclusions have since been confirmed by numerous other workers in both the Atlantic and the Pacific. 2. Primary production on reefs has been studied by flow respirometry, measuring changes in oxygen or carbon dioxide concentrations in water flowing over reefs. Production of benthic organisms has also been measured in situ by light and dark bottle methods and by radioactive tracer techniques. Production values obtained by the various methods are not identical but their use in combination is to be recommended. 3. Rates of gross primary production on reefs vary between 300–5000 gC/m²/yr. These rates are higher than general oceanic values and as high as those of the most productive marine communities. 4. Sources of primary production include fleshy macrophytes, calcareous algae, filamentous algae on the coral skeletons or calcareous rock, marine grasses and the zooxanthellae within coral tissue. Production values from the various sources fall within the range of production of reefs as a whole. 5. Concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in waters flowing over reefs are consistently low. There is evidence to suggest that both these nutrients are recycled rapidly on the reef and that nitrogen is fixed by bacteria and primary producers. 6. In many instances the mass of detritus over coral reefs exceeds the biomass of zooplankton. While the quantitative significance of detritus as food for corals and other benthic organisms has not been evaluated, there is a growing body of evidence to show that this may be the key to understanding secondary production. 7. Opinions differ on the adequacy of zooplankton in satisfying the food requirements of corals and other benthic invertebrates on reefs. The weight of evidence suggests that while there is a removal of zooplankton by benthic organisms, the total biomass carried over the reef is too small to support the energy needs of secondary production. 8. Bacteria are a potential source of energy for secondary production on reefs and are implicated in nitrogen fixation, decomposition and biogeochemical cycling. 9. There is an abundance of sessile invertebrates other than corals on reefs but there are few quantitative data on their importance in secondary production. 10. The biomass of fish on reefs may be very high but the quantitative significance of grazing and predation is not fully established. 11. Studies on the growth of corals themselves have been based on measurements of skeletal accretion. These methods do not lead directly to estimates of reef organic production. Growth rates of corals vary considerably between and within species. 12. Estimates of reef growth have been made from measurements of coral growth and from the flux of calcium carbonate. There is less quantitative information on erosion caused by mechanical damage, by boring organisms and by human pollution. 13. Hydrographic factors influence growth and form of reefs and there is some evidence to show that production is enhanced by conservation of water in lagoonal areas.     

珊瑚共生体碳代谢特征研究进展

珊瑚礁作为一种典型的海洋生态系统,具有巨大的固碳和储碳潜力。然而,目前对于珊瑚礁的净碳能力(碳释放与碳吸收)仍存在争议,主要归因于珊瑚共生体碳代谢的多样性和复杂性。珊瑚礁在生物钙化、呼吸过程中向大气释放二氧化碳(CO₂);但在生物合成和沉积过程中却可以将碳进行固定与埋藏;为此,珊瑚礁的碳源碳汇身份还有待明确。现有部分研究表明,共生体通过碳代谢可以促进珊瑚礁吸收大气中的CO₂。此外,珊瑚礁和海岸带蓝碳生态系统通常表现出很强的连通性,珊瑚共生体碳代谢能有效提高海岸带盐沼植被、海草床、海洋浮游植物等生物的碳汇功能。为了加深对珊瑚礁碳源-碳汇功能的理解,综述了珊瑚共生体的碳代谢特征,梳理了共生体中碳的关键生态过程(有机碳的迁移、无机碳的转化、两者的赋存状态),总结了细菌-虫黄藻-病毒在共生体碳代谢中的作用,评述了珊瑚礁碳源-碳汇特征及影响因子。旨在阐明珊瑚共生体碳代谢的关键过程,并基于此寻求有效的珊瑚礁碳增汇技术,形成以碳增量为主的珊瑚保护与修复技术,提升珊瑚礁在蓝碳生态系统中的贡献。     

A preliminary study of the biology and ecology of the blue starfish Linckia laevigata (L.) on the Australian Great Barrier Reef and an interpretation of its role in the coral reef ecosystem

The blue starfish Linckia laevigata grazes coralline algae. The starfish populations studied were composed entirely of adults. Spawning takes place in October at the southern end of the Great Barrier Reef. On reefs which were unaffected by Acanthaster planci, L. laevigata was confined to algae covered reef tops and rubble banks. On reefs affected by A. planci, L. laevigata had extended its range and was feeding on and among the coralline algae covered dead hard coral skeletons on the reef perimeter. Coral regrowth, followingattack by A. planci , was found to be slower on reefs with populations of L. laevigata living on the reef perimeter than on reefs where they were absent from this region. It is suggested that grazing by L. laevigata destroys small coral colonies and newly settled larvae thus slowing down the rate of coral regeneration. The consequences of this reduced rate of recolonisation is also discussed.     

Bioerosion in Late Permian Rugosa from reefal blocks (Hawasina Complex,Oman Mountains): implications for reef degradation

Summary Rugose corals are known from allochthonous Late Permian reefal blocks of the A1 Jil and Ba’id Formation (Hawasina Complex), Oman Mountains. In contrast to many Late Permian Rugosa found elsewhere in the Tethys, they occurred in sponge reefs and contributed to reef construction. The waagenophyllid warm water coral fauna is moderately diverse comprising cerioid, thamnasterioid, and fasciculate taxa. In contrast to sponges, chaetetids, and low-growing reefbuilders, the corals secreted diagenetically stable, most probably Mg-calcitic skeletons. Borings in coral skeletons are consequently well preserved providing important data for the interpretation of reef destructive processes. Thin-section analysis revealed three taxa of infaunal borers includingEntobia Bronn 1837, uncertain thallophyte borings, and borings of unknown bioeroders. Macroborers were more important than microborers, because of the dominance of clionid sponges. Good evidence exists also for the occurrence of two types of undetermined grazers which destroyed the coral surfaces. The amount and distribution of bioerosions is variable among different coral taxa. The fasciculate coralPraewentzelella regulare Flügel 1995 was the favorate substrate. Up to 33% of the calices were bored. Dendroid and compound corals were bored subordinately. Bioerosion of these colonies does not exceed 2%. There is good evidence for substrate preference amongst the borers. Major controlling factors affecting borer distribution are believed to be variations of skeletal density and gross morphology. The borer assemblage could not limit reef accretion significantly. Factors controlling boring activity might have been quality of substrate, sedimentation rate, rapid incrustation of substrates, and competition for food with reef constructors including sponges, chaetetids, and rugose corals.     

Operationalizing resilience for adaptive coral reef management under global environmental change

Cumulative pressures from global climate and ocean change combined with multiple regional and local‐scale stressors pose fundamental challenges to coral reef managers worldwide. Understanding how cumulative stressors affect coral reef vulnerability is critical for successful reef conservation now and in the future. In this review, we present the case that strategically managing for increased ecological resilience (capacity for stress resistance and recovery) can reduce coral reef vulnerability (risk of net decline) up to a point. Specifically, we propose an operational framework for identifying effective management levers to enhance resilience and support management decisions that reduce reef vulnerability. Building on a system understanding of biological and ecological processes that drive resilience of coral reefs in different environmental and socio‐economic settings, we present an Adaptive Resilience‐Based management (ARBM) framework and suggest a set of guidelines for how and where resilience can be enhanced via management interventions. We argue that press‐type stressors (pollution, sedimentation, overfishing, ocean warming and acidification) are key threats to coral reef resilience by affecting processes underpinning resistance and recovery, while pulse‐type (acute) stressors (e.g. storms, bleaching events, crown‐of‐thorns starfish outbreaks) increase the demand for resilience. We apply the framework to a set of example problems for Caribbean and Indo‐Pacific reefs. A combined strategy of active risk reduction and resilience support is needed, informed by key management objectives, knowledge of reef ecosystem processes and consideration of environmental and social drivers. As climate change and ocean acidification erode the resilience and increase the vulnerability of coral reefs globally, successful adaptive management of coral reefs will become increasingly difficult. Given limited resources, on‐the‐ground solutions are likely to focus increasingly on actions that support resilience at finer spatial scales, and that are tightly linked to ecosystem goods and services.     

The dynamics of architectural complexity on coral reefs under climate change

One striking feature of coral reef ecosystems is the complex benthic architecture which supports diverse and abundant fauna, particularly of reef fish. Reef‐building corals are in decline worldwide, with a corresponding loss of live coral cover resulting in a loss of architectural complexity. Understanding the dynamics of the reef architecture is therefore important to envision the ability of corals to maintain functional habitats in an era of climate change. Here, we develop a mechanistic model of reef topographical complexity for contemporary Caribbean reefs. The model describes the dynamics of corals and other benthic taxa under climate‐driven disturbances (hurricanes and coral bleaching). Corals have a simplified shape with explicit diameter and height, allowing species‐specific calculation of their colony surface and volume. Growth and the mechanical (hurricanes) and biological erosion (parrotfish) of carbonate skeletons are important in driving the pace of extension/reduction in the upper reef surface, the net outcome being quantified by a simple surface roughness index (reef rugosity). The model accurately simulated the decadal changes of coral cover observed in Cozumel (Mexico) between 1984 and 2008, and provided a realistic hindcast of coral colony‐scale (1–10 m) changing rugosity over the same period. We then projected future changes of Caribbean reef rugosity in response to global warming. Under severe and frequent thermal stress, the model predicted a dramatic loss of rugosity over the next two or three decades. Critically, reefs with managed parrotfish populations were able to delay the general loss of architectural complexity, as the benefits of grazing in maintaining living coral outweighed the bioerosion of dead coral skeletons. Overall, this model provides the first explicit projections of reef rugosity in a warming climate, and highlights the need of combining local (protecting and restoring high grazing) to global (mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions) interventions for the persistence of functional reef habitats.     

Effects of herbivory,nutrients, and reef protection on algal proliferation and coral growth on a tropical reef

Maintaining coral reef resilience against increasing anthropogenic disturbance is critical for effective reef management. Resilience is partially determined by how processes, such as herbivory and nutrient supply, affect coral recovery versus macroalgal proliferation following disturbances. However, the relative effects of herbivory versus nutrient enrichment on algal proliferation remain debated. Here, we manipulated herbivory and nutrients on a coral-dominated reef protected from fishing, and on an adjacent macroalgal-dominated reef subject to fishing and riverine discharge, over 152 days. On both reefs, herbivore exclusion increased total and upright macroalgal cover by 9-46 times, upright macroalgal biomass by 23-84 times, and cyanobacteria cover by 0-27 times, but decreased cover of encrusting coralline algae by 46-100% and short turf algae by 14-39%. In contrast, nutrient enrichment had no effect on algal proliferation, but suppressed cover of total macroalgae (by 33-42%) and cyanobacteria (by 71% on the protected reef) when herbivores were excluded. Herbivore exclusion, but not nutrient enrichment, also increased sediment accumulation, suggesting a strong link between herbivory, macroalgal growth, and sediment retention. Growth rates of the corals Porites cylindrica and Acropora millepora were 30-35% greater on the protected versus fished reef, but nutrient and herbivore manipulations within a site did not affect coral growth. Cumulatively, these data suggest that herbivory rather than eutrophication plays the dominant role in mediating macroalgal proliferation, that macroalgae trap sediments that may further suppress herbivory and enhance macroalgal dominance, and that corals are relatively resistant to damage from some macroalgae but are significantly impacted by ambient reef condition.     

Decay of skeletal organic matrices and early diagenesis in coral skeletons

Due to its particular mode of growth, the coral skeleton provides a natural model for evaluating the successive stages of diagenesis in a still-living organism. The spatial distribution of skeletal organic matrices and their early diagenesis have been investigated in a scleractinian skeleton with in situ micron-scale analyses by Raman Microspectroscopy. Results indicate that the decay of the organic matrices occurs within a few years. We suggest that the gradual deterioration of the skeletal organic matrices is a key-mechanism driving earliest diagenesis in coral skeletons and represents the starting-point of the process of fossilization.     

Coral mortality,recovery and reef degradation at Mexico Rocks Patch Reef Complex,Northern Belize,Central America: 1995–1997

The 1995 coral bleaching event in the western Caribbean was the first reported episode that significantly affected the Belize barrier and lagoonal patch reefs. Bleaching was attributed to a 2 mo period of warm water temperatures above 30°C. Near Ambergris Caye, barrier and patch reefs experienced up to 50% bleaching. At Mexico Rocks patch reef complex, the bleaching resulted in changes in reef health, community, and physical structure. Prior to the hyperthermal episode, patch reef surface area consisted of 47% healthy framework coral coverage, 12% secondarily colonized biotic coverage, 35% dead coral surfaces that were degraded by biological activity and physical erosion, and 6%cavities. six months after bleaching, most corals had regained their color, but, owing to coral mortality, areas of surface degradation had increased to an average 49% (p=0.029 based on Kruskal–Wallis analyses). Eighteen months after bleaching, degraded surface areas expanded to 53% (p=0.0366). Although re-coloring indicates rapid recovery for surviving corals, the persistence in dead coral surfaces suggests that reef skeletal structure recovery lags behind that of individual corals. Initial results of framework measurements indicate that bleaching events may result in an ‘imbalance’ in the carbonate production rate of coral reefs and produce mass wasting of the skeletal structure. Remapping of reef skeletal structure should establish quantitative measures for the long-term effects of bleaching on patch reef frameworks.     

Millennial-scale change in the structure of a Caribbean reef ecosystem and the role of human and natural disturbance

Caribbean coral reefs have transformed into algal-dominated habitats over the past half-century, but the role of specific anthropogenic drivers is unresolved due to the lack of ecosystem-level data predating human disturbance. To better understand the extent and causes of long-term Caribbean reef declines, we produced a continuous 3000-yr record of the ecosystem state of three reefs in Bocas del Toro, Caribbean Panama. From fossils and sediments obtained from reef matrix cores, we tracked changes in reef accretion rates and the taxonomic and functional group composition of fish, coral, urchin, bivalve and benthic foraminifera. This dataset provided a comprehensive picture of reef community and environmental change. At all sites, reefs shifted from systems with greater relative abundance of herbivorous fish, epifaunal suspension feeding bivalves and Diadema urchins to systems with greater relative abundance of micropredator fish, infaunal bivalves and Echinometra urchins. These transitions were initiated a millennium ago at two less-degraded reefs fringing offshore islands and ~250 yr ago at a degraded patch reef near the continental coast. Ecosystem shifts were accompanied by a decline in reef accretion rates, and at the patch reef, a decline in water quality since the 18th century. Within all cores, synchronous increases in infaunal bivalves and declines in herbivorous fish regardless of water quality suggest a loss of hard substrate and increasingly hypoxic sediment conditions related to herbivore loss. While the early timing of ecosystem transitions at the fringing reefs implicates large-scale hydrological change, the more recent timing of change and loss of water quality at the patch reef implicates terrigenous runoff from land-clearing. Our whole-ecosystem reconstruction reveals that reef ecosystem deterioration appears to follow a predictable trajectory whether driven by natural or anthropogenic disturbances and that historical local human activities have quickly unraveled reefs at a scale similar to longer-term natural environmental change.     

Scaling analysis of coral reef systems: an approach to problems of scale

Dimensional analysis and scaling are related, semi-formal procedures for capturing the essential process(es) controlling the behaviour of a complex system, and for describing the functional relationships between them. The techniques involve the parameterization of natural processes, the identification of the temporal and spatial scales of variation of processes, and the evaluation of potential interactions between processes referenced to those scales using non-dimensional (scaled) parameters. Scaling approaches are increasingly being applied to a broad range of marine ecological problems, with the aims of assessing the relative importance of physical and biological parameters in controlling variation in process rates, and placing limits on the ability of one process to affect another. The value of the approach to coral reef research lies in the conceptualization of relationships between discipline-specific processes, and the evaluation of scale-dependent processes across the large range of spatial and temporal scales which pertain to coral reefs. Characteristic scales of physical, geological and biological processes exhibit different patterns of distribution along the temporal dimension. Scaling arguments based on examples from reef systems indicate that a large group of biological and biogeochemical processes are strongly influenced by hydrodynamic processe occuring at similar time scales within the range from about on hour to one year. We argue that scaling approaches to process-related problems are pre-requisite to interdisciplinary research on coral reefs.     

The role of turtles as coral reef macroherbivores

Herbivory is widely accepted as a vital function on coral reefs. To date, the majority of studies examining herbivory in coral reef environments have focused on the roles of fishes and/or urchins, with relatively few studies considering the potential role of macroherbivores in reef processes. Here, we introduce evidence that highlights the potential role of marine turtles as herbivores on coral reefs. While conducting experimental habitat manipulations to assess the roles of herbivorous reef fishes we observed green turtles (Chelonia mydas) and hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) showing responses that were remarkably similar to those of herbivorous fishes. Reducing the sediment load of the epilithic algal matrix on a coral reef resulted in a forty-fold increase in grazing by green turtles. Hawksbill turtles were also observed to browse transplanted thalli of the macroalga Sargassum swartzii in a coral reef environment. These responses not only show strong parallels to herbivorous reef fishes, but also highlight that marine turtles actively, and intentionally, remove algae from coral reefs. When considering the size and potential historical abundance of marine turtles we suggest that these potentially valuable herbivores may have been lost from many coral reefs before their true importance was understood.