Non-Specific Induction of Pisatin and Local Resistance in Pea Leaves by Elicitors from Mycosphaerella pinodes, M. melonis and M. ligulicola and the Effect of Suppressor from M. pinodes

The accumulation of pisatin was induced non-specifically by elicitors prepared from the high molecular weight fraction (molecular weight: more than 10,000 daltons) of the spore germination fluid of three species of Mycosphaerella-plant pathogens in pea leaves with epidermis removed, regardless of the pathogenicity of the fungi to pea. Before the elicitation of pisatin synthesis, local resistance to infection by Mycosphaerella pinodes was induced by elicitors again non-specifically inpea leaves in which wax had been removed from the leaf surface. The substance responsible for local resistance could be extracted with ethylacetate from the elicitor-containing drop diffusate which was placed on pea leaves. The substance prevented the penetration of M. pinodes through heat-killed pea epidermis, but did not affect spore germination. The suppressor prepared from the low molecular weight fraction (molecular weight: less than 10,000 daltons) of the spore germination fluid of M.pinodes counteracted the ability of elicitors to induce both phases of resistance mechanisms.     

Regulation of Polyphosphoinositide Metabolism in Pea Plasma Membranes by Elicitor and Suppressor from a Pea Pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes

Effects of the elicitor and the suppressor from a pea pathogen,Mycosphaerella pinodes, on polyphosphoinositide metabolism inpea plasma membranes were examined in vitro. Lipid phosphorylationin the isolated pea plasma membrane was drastically stimulatedby the elicitor, but markedly inhibited by the suppressor. Asimilar inhibitory effect was observed by the treatment withorthovanadate or K-252a that blocked pisatin production inducedby the elicitor. Neomycin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic thatinteracts with the polyphosphoinositide metabolism, also affectedthe lipid phosphorylation in vitro and blocked the elicitor-inducedaccumulation of pisatin in vivo. These results suggest thatrapid changes of polyphosphoinositide metabolism in pea plasmamembranes is one of indispensable processes during the elicitationof defense responses. (Received January 22, 1992; Accepted March 23, 1992)     

Two Suppressors, Supprescins A and B, Secreted by a Pea Pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes

Two mucin-type glycopeptides that suppressed the productionof pisatin, a phytoalexin of pea, were purified from a pea pathogen,Mycosphaerella pinodes. The structures of Supprescin A (Mr,452) and Supprescin B (Mr, 959) were determined by an analysisof amino acid sequences and ¹³C- and ¹H-NMR. (Received April 22, 1992; Accepted June 16, 1992)     

Role of Inhibitors of Fungal Growth in the Limitation of Leaf Spots Caused by Ascochyta pisi and Mycosphaerella pinodes

The phytoalexin, pisatin, was detected in host tissues 24 hafter inoculation of pea leaflets with spores of the leaf-spottingpathogens Ascochyta pisi and Mycosphaerella pinodes. Pisatincontinued to accumulate in infected tissue as A. pisi lesionsdeveloped and was present in inhibitory concentrations in thebrown tissue beyond the region colonized by the pathogen. During the formation of limited M. pinodes lesions, concentrationsof pisatin were highest 2 days after inoculation. Levels weremore variable and lower in older lesions which appeared to containno other inhibitors of germ-tube growth. Spreading lesions causedby M. pinodes on leaflets floating on water contained littleor no pisatin although little was released to the water below.These lesions did, however, contain other highly active inhibitorsof germ-tube growth. The significance of these results in terms of limitation oflesions are discussed. The ease with which M. pinodes lesionscan become progressive may reflect the greater ability of thispathogen to grow in high concentrations of pisatin under certainconditions.     

Inhibition of ATPase Activity in Pea Plasma Membranes In Situ by a Suppressor from a Pea Pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes

A pathogenic fungus of pea, Mycosphaerella pinodes, secretesa so-called "suppressor" in its pycnospore germination fluid.The suppressor blocks the defense responses and induces localsusceptibility (accessibility) in pea plants to agents thatare not pathogenic in pea. The suppressor nonspecifically inhibitsthe ATPase activity in plasma membranes prepared from pea, soybean,kidney bean, cowpea and barley plants. However, cytochemicalstudies by electron microscopy indicate that the suppressorspecifically inhibits the ATPase in pea cell membranes, butnot in those of four other plant species tested. That is, thespecificity of the suppressor appears at the cell and/or tissuelevel, but is not evident in vitro. Furthermore, the inhibitoryeffect of the suppressor is temporary because the ATPase activityrecovers 9 h after the treatment. A similar effect was observedafter inoculation with M. pinodes but not with a nonpathogenof pea, M. ligulicola. The role of the suppressor in host-parasitespecificity is discussed. (Received April 9, 1991; Accepted August 6, 1991)     

Plant Lectins Induce the Production of a Phytoalexin in Pisum sativum

The effects of several plant lectins on the production of apea phytoalexin, pisatin, were examined. Con A, PHA, PNA andPSA each induced the production of pisatin in pea epicotyl tissues,demonstrating that plant lectins can act as elicitors. The productionof pisatin in response to PHA, PNA or PSA was not affected bythe simultaneous presence of the respective hapten sugars, whereashaptens specific for Con A, such as -D-mannose and methyl--D-mannoside,abolished the induction of pisatin by Con A. These results indicatethat the elicitor effect of Con A is attributable to its abilityto bind to specific carbohydrates in pea cells. Induction ofthe production of pisatin by Con A was markedly inhibited bythe suppressor derived from a pea pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes,and by several inhibitors related to signal-transduction pathways.It is suggested, therefore, that the Con A-induced productionof pisatin in pea tissues might be associated with activationof a signal-transduction pathway. An additive effect on theaccumulation of pisatin was observed when Con A was presentwith a polysaccharide elicitor from M. pinodes, suggesting thatexogenous Con A does not compete with the recognition site(s)for the fungal elicitor in pea cells. The present data alsoindicate that Con A may be useful for characterization of thesignal-transduction system that leads to the synthesis of phytoalexinin pea epicotyl tissues. (Received November 16, 1994; Accepted April 20, 1995)     

Suppression of Pisatin Production and ATPase Activity in Pea Plasma Membranes by Orthovanadate, Verapamil and a Suppressor from Mycosphaerella pinodes

A pea pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes, secretes both an elicitorand a suppressor for the accumulation of pisatin, a major phytoalexinof pea, into the spore germination fluid. The effects of theelicitor and the suppressor on the ATPase activity in pea plasmamembranes was examined. The ATPase was sensitive to orthovanadateand dicyclohexylcarbodiimide but insensitive to nitrate andazide; it was unaffected by the elicitor but was markedly inhibitedby the suppressor (50µg.ml^–1, bovine serum albuminequivalents) or verapamil (1OOµM). The accumulation ofpisatin induced by the elicitor was delayed for 3 to 6 h inthe presence of orthovanadate or verapamil to an extent similarto that in the presence of the suppressor. The relationshipbetween the inhibition of plasma membrane ATPase activity andthe suppression of the active defense reaction that involvesthe production of pisatin in the pea plant is discussed. (Received April 16, 1990; Accepted September 6, 1990)     

Specific Response of Partially Purified Cell Wall-Bound ATPases to Fungal Suppressor

It was found that NTPases were bound to cell walls of pea andcowpea. The suppressor in pycnospore germination fluid of apea pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes, inhibited the ATPase activityin the fraction, which was solubilized from pea cell wall with0.5% Triton X-100, in a dose-dependent manner, but rather enhancedthat from cowpea cell wall even at the concentration of 1 µgml^-1. Inhibition by the suppressor of pea cell wall-bound ATPasewas a mixed type of competitive and noncompetitive. Triton X-100PAGE and active staining of ATPase indicated that both TritonX-100 solubilized fractions contained plural molecules thathydrolyze ATP. The M_rs of cell wall-bound ATPases seem to beconsiderably different from those of plasma membranes, and thenumber of cell wall-bound ATPase molecules were different betweenpea and cowpea. The electroeluted fractions corresponding tothe bands of active-stained ATPases were also able to hydrolyzeNTP and PP_i. The respective electroeluted ATPases also showedthe species-specific response to the suppressor. These resultsmay confirm our previous concept that putative receptors forthe suppressor might tightly bind to cell wall-bound ATPaseor that the ATPase might be the receptor itself. (Received September 8, 1995; Accepted March 9, 1996)     

Leaf Spots Induced by Ascochyta pisi and Mycosphaerella pinodes

The leaf-spot pathogens, Ascochyta pisi and Mycosphaerella pinodes,both cause limited, necrotic lesions in detached pea leafletssuspended above water. When leaflets were floated on water A.pisi lesions were still limited, but those caused by M. pinodesspread rapidly to occupy all the leaflet tissue. Increasing the numbers of spores in inocula decreased numbersof mature lesions caused by A. pisi, but increased numbers ofspreading lesions caused by M. pinodes. Older leaflets weremore susceptible to both pathogens. Studies of penetration and colonization of leaves with the aidof light and electron microscopy showed that cell-wall-degradingenzymes were involved in the formation of A. pisi lesions andin spreading lesions caused by M. pinodes. There was littleevidence of cell-wall degradation in limited M. pinodes lesionsin which penetration of walls by hyphae seemed to be mechanicalin nature. No physical barriers developed in tissues surrounding limitedlesions. Nevertheless, A. pisi was rarely found beyond the necroticarea. This suggested that tissues beyond the lesion had becomeresistant to the parasite. In contrast, M. pinodes often grewoutside the necrotic area, sometimes many days after this hadstopped growing, but when it did so it caused no more necrosisunless leaflets were placed in conditions in which the spreadingtype of lesion could develop.     

Orthovanadate Suppresses Accumulation of Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase mRNA and Chalcone Synthase mRNA in Pea Epicotyls Induced by Elicitor from Mycosphaerella pinodes

Orthovanadate delayed accumulation of mRNAs encoding phenylalanineammonia-lyase and chalcone synthase in pea epicotyls inducedby an elicitor from Mycosphaerella pinodes. However, accumulationof mRNA for a putative P-type ATPase was not affected. The relationshipbetweenthe ATPase and defense responses is discussed. ³Present address: Plant Pathology Laboratory, School of Agriculture,Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya, 464-01 Japan.     

Specific Inhibition of Cell Wall-Bound ATPases by Fungal Suppressor from Mycosphaerella pinodes

Activities of phosphatases were found in the fractions whichwere solubilized from cell walls of both pea and cowpea seedlingswith 0.5 M NaCl. These phosphatases hydrolyzed triphosphonucleotidesin the order: UTP=CTP>GTP>ATP; and UTP=GTP>CTP=ATP,respectively. The activities of a pyrophosphatase and a p-nitrophenylphosphatasewere also detected in these fractions. The suppressor in thespore germination fluid of a pea pathogen,Mycosphaerella pinodes,inhibited all of these phosphatase activities in the fractionsolubilized from pea cell walls, but it rather enhanced onlythe activity of the ATPase among those phosphatases from thecowpea cell wall. Hydrolysis of ATP by a cell wall fractionof pea was also markedly inhibited by the suppressor, whilehydrolysis of ATP by similar fractions from cowpea, kidney beanand soybean were rather enhanced by the suppressor, as wellas by the elicitor. Thus, the cell wall-bound ATPases respondedto the suppressor species-specifically. These cell wall-boundATPases seemed to be different from the plasma membrane ATPasesin several respects. The results suggest that plants recognizethe fungal signals not only on their plasma membranes but alsoon their cell walls and, moreover that putative receptors forthe fungal signals might be located close to cell wall-boundATPases or might even be these ATPases themselves. (Received November 16, 1994; Accepted April 20, 1995)     

Rapid Changes in Polyphosphoinositide Metabolism in Pea in Response to Fungal Signals

Effects of the elicitor and/or suppressor from Mycosphaerellapinodes on polyphosphoinositide metabolism (PI metabolism) inpea were examined both in vivo and in vitro. The elicitor induceda rapid and biphasic increase in levels of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate(PtdInsP₂) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP₃) in epicotyltissues that was apparent within 15 min. A transient increasein levels of PtdInsP₂ and IP₃ was detected immediately in elicitor-treatedplasma membranes. However, the concomitant presence of suppressorwith elicitor resulted in inhibition of these increases bothin vivo and in vitro. These findings suggest that the elicitorrapidly activates phosphatidylinositol kinase, phosphatidylinositol-4-monophosphatekinase and phospholipase C, which are involved in PI metabolism,whereas the suppressor markedly inhibits these enzymes. Neomycin,a known inhibitor of phospholipase C, blocked the elicitor-inducedaccumulation both of IP₃ and pisatin and it also induced localsusceptibility in pea tissues that resembled that of the fungalsuppressor. From these results, it appears that rapid changesin PI metabolism are indispensable in the signal transductionrelated to defense responses of pea plants. (Received January 18, 1993; Accepted May 13, 1993)     

A Single,Plastic Population of Mycosphaerella pinodes Causes Ascochyta Blight on Winter and Spring Peas (Pisum sativum) in France

Plant diseases are caused by pathogen populations continuously subjected to evolutionary forces (genetic flow, selection, and recombination). Ascochyta blight, caused by Mycosphaerella pinodes, is one of the most damaging necrotrophic pathogens of field peas worldwide. In France, both winter and spring peas are cultivated. Although these crops overlap by about 4 months (March to June), primary Ascochyta blight infections are not synchronous on the two crops. This suggests that the disease could be due to two different M. pinodes populations, specialized on either winter or spring pea. To test this hypothesis, 144 pathogen isolates were collected in the field during the winter and spring growing seasons in Rennes (western France), and all the isolates were genotyped using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Furthermore, the pathogenicities of 33 isolates randomly chosen within the collection were tested on four pea genotypes (2 winter and 2 spring types) grown under three climatic regimes, simulating winter, late winter, and spring conditions. M. pinodes isolates from winter and spring peas were genetically polymorphic but not differentiated according to the type of cultivars. Isolates from winter pea were more pathogenic than isolates from spring pea on hosts raised under winter conditions, while isolates from spring pea were more pathogenic than those from winter pea on plants raised under spring conditions. These results show that disease developed on winter and spring peas was initiated by a single population of M. pinodes whose pathogenicity is a plastic trait modulated by the physiological status of the host plant.     

Suppressors: Determinants of Specificity Produced by Plant Pathogens

Plant pathogens secrete suppressors that delay or prevent thehost defense responses, with resultant conditioning of hostcells such that they become susceptible even to avirulent ornon-pathogenic microorganisms. Suppressors have been characterizedas glycoproteins, glycopeptides, peptides and anionic and nonanionicglucans. A suppressor itself is non-toxic to plant cells and,thus, it can be distinguished from host-specific toxins producedby certain pathogens. Suppressors disturb fundamental functionsof host plasma membranes. For example, the suppressor from apea pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes, inhibits both the ATPaseactivity and polyphosphoinositide metabolism in pea plasma membranes,causing the temporary suppression of the signal-transductionpathway that leads to the expression of defense genes, whichencode key enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway to phytoalexin.In this review, evidence for the role of suppressors in thedetermination of plant host-parasite specificity is summarized. ³Present address: Plant Pathology Laboratory, School of Agriculture,Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya, 464-01 Japan     

Detection of partial resistance quantitative trait loci against Didymella pinodes in Medicago truncatula

Ascochyta blight caused by Didymella pinodes (formerly Mycosphaerella pinodes) is one of the most important fungal diseases of pea (Pisum sativum) worldwide that can also infect the model legume Medicago truncatula. The objective of this study was to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) controlling resistance to D. pinodes in M. truncatula. Response to D. pinodes was studied under controlled conditions in seedlings of a population derived from the cross J6 × F83005.5, two M. truncatula lines that are, respectively, resistant and susceptible to D. pinodes. A combined map using two different recombinant inbred line populations was then used to identify the genomic regions bearing putative QTLs and to improve the position of the QTLs. A single QTL associated with resistance to D. pinodes was detected on linkage group 2, explaining up to 13 % of the total phenotypic variation for relative disease severity against the pathogen. Two simple sequence repeat markers, MTE80 and mtic890 (3 cM apart) were the ones most significantly associated with the QTL. These markers are located in bacterial artifical chromosomes AC119409 and AC125474, respectively, both of them overlapping on M. truncatula chromosome 2. The integration of QTL analysis and genomics in M. truncatula will contribute to the development of new markers and facilitate the identification of candidate genes for Ascochyta blight resistance.     

Mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to <Emphasis Type="Italic">Mycosphaerella pinodes</Emphasis> in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pisum sativum</Emphasis> subsp. <Emphasis Type="Italic">syriacum</Emphasis>

Aschochyta blight, caused by Mycosphaerella pinodes, is one of the most economically serious pea pathogens, particularly in winter sowings. The wild Pisum sativum subsp. syriacum accession P665 shows good levels of resistance to this pathogen. Knowledge of the genetic factors controlling resistance to M. pinodes in this wild accession would facilitate gene transfer to pea cultivars; however, previous studies mapping resistance to M. pinodes in pea have never included this wild species. The objective of this study was to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling resistance to M. pinodes in P. sativum subsp. syriacum and to compare these with QTLs previously described for the same trait in P. sativum. A population formed by 111 F_6:7 recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between accession P665 and a susceptible pea cultivar (Messire) was analysed using morphological, isozyme, RAPD, STS and EST markers. The map developed covered 1214 cM and contained 246 markers distributed in nine linkage groups, of which seven could be assigned to pea chromosomes. Six QTLs associated with resistance to M. pinodes were detected in linkage groups II, III, IV and V, which collectively explained between 31 and 75% of the phenotypic variation depending of the trait. While QTLs MpIII.1 and MpIII.2 were detected both for seedlings and field resistance, MpV.1 and MpII.1 were specific for growth chamber conditions and MpIII.3 and MpIV.1 for field resistance. Quantitative trait loci MpIII.1, MpII.1, MpIII.2 and MpIII.3 may coincide with other QTLs associated with resistance to M. pinodes previously described in P. sativum. Four QTLs associated with earliness of flowering were also identified. While dfIII.2 and dfVI.1, may correspond with other genes and QTLs controlling earliness in P. sativum, dfIII.1 and dfII.1 may be specific to P. sativum subsp. syriacum. Flowering date and growth habit were strongly associated with resistance to M. pinodes in the field evaluations. The relation observed between earliness, growth habit and resistance to M. pinodes is discussed.     

Growth and Biomass Allocation, with Varying Nitrogen Availability, of Near-isogenic Pea Lines with Differing Foliage Structure

The single-gene mutation afila in pea (Pisum sativum L.) resultsin the replacement of proximal leaflets with branched tendrils,thereby reducing leaf area. This study investigated whethertheafila line could adjust biomass partitioning when exposedto varying nutrient regimes, to compensate for reduced leafarea, compared with wild-type plants. Wild-type and afila near-isogeniclines were grown in solution culture with nitrate-N added toinitially N-starved seedlings at relative addition rates (R_N)of 0.06, 0.12, 0.15 and 0.50 d^-1. The relative growth rate (R_W)of the whole plants closely matched R_Nat 0.06 and 0.12 d^-1,but higher R_Nresulted in a slightly higher growth rate. At agiven R_N, the wild-type line had lower plant nitrogen statusthan the afila line. R_Wof the roots of the afila line was lessthan R_Wof the roots of the wild-type at the three higher ratesof N supply despite a greater accumulation of N in the rootsof the afila plants. Consequently, plant nitrogen productivity(growth rate per unit nitrogen) was lower for afila. Dry matterallocation was strongly influenced by nitrogen status, but nodifferences in shoot–root dry matter allocation were foundbetween wild-type and afila with the same plant N status. Theseresults imply that decreased leaf area as a result of the single-genemutation afila affects dry matter allocation, but only accordingto its effect on the nitrogen status. Copyright 2000 Annalsof Botany Company Pisum sativum, pea, nitrogen limitation, growth, shoot–root allocation, relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity, isolines     

Proteomic analysis of pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs) induced by compatible and incompatible interactions of pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) in Capsicum chinense L3 plants

Resistance conferred by the L³ gene is active against most ofthe tobamoviruses, including the Spanish strain (PMMoV-S), aP_1,2 pathotype, but not against certain strains of pepper mildmottle virus (PMMoV), termed P_1,2,3 pathotype, such as the Italianstrain (PMMoV-I). Both viruses are nearly identical at theirnucleotide sequence level (98%) and were used to challenge Capsicumchinense PI159236 plants harbouring the L³ gene in order tocarry out a comparative proteomic analysis of PR proteins inducedin this host in response to infection by either PMMoV-S or PMMoV-I.PMMoV-S induces a hypersensitive reaction (HR) in C. chinensePI159236 plant leaves with the formation of necrotic local lesionsand restriction of the virus at the primary infection sites.In this paper, C. chinense PR protein isoforms belonging tothe PR-1, β-1,3-glucanases (PR-2), chitinases (PR-3), osmotin-likeprotein (PR-5), peroxidases (PR-9), germin-like protein (PR-16),and PRp27 (PR-17) have been identified. Three of these PR proteinisoforms were specifically induced during PMMoV-S-activationof C. chinense L³ gene-mediated resistance: an acidic β-1,3-glucanaseisoform (PR-2) (M_r 44.6; pI 5.1), an osmotin-like protein (PR-5)(M_r 26.8; pI 7.5), and a basic PR-1 protein isoform (M_r 18;pI 9.4–10.0). In addition, evidence is presented for adifferential accumulation of C. chinense PR proteins and mRNAsin the compatible (PMMoV-I)–C. chinense and incompatible(PMMoV-S)–C. chinense interactions for proteins belongingto all PR proteins detected. Except for an acidic chitinase(PR-3) (M_r 30.2; pI 5.0), an earlier and higher accumulationof PR proteins and mRNAs was detected in plants associated withHR induction. Furthermore, the accumulation rates of PR proteinsand mRNA did not correlate with maximal accumulation levelsof viral RNA, thus indicating that PR protein expression mayreflect the physiological status of the plant. Key words: Capsicum chinense, compatible interaction, incompatible interaction, HR-induction, PMMoV, PR proteins Received 5 December 2007; Revised 21 January 2008 Accepted 22 January 2008