Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel plant poly(A) polymerase

We have isolated cDNA clones encoding a novel factor (PAP-I) that is a component of a multi-subunit poly(A) polymerase from pea seedlings. The encoded protein, when isolated from appropriately engineered Escherichia coli, was active as a poly(A) polymerase, either with an associated RNA binding cofactor (PAP-III) or with free poly(A) as an RNA substrate. The latter observation indicates that PAP-I is in fact a poly(A) polymerase. PAP-I bore a striking resemblance to an as yet uncharacterized cyanobacterial protein. This observation suggested a possible chloroplast localization for PAP-I. This hypothesis was tested and found to be substantiated; immunoblot analysis identified PAP-I in chloroplast but not nuclear extracts. Our results suggest that PAP-I is a component of the machinery that adds poly(A) to chloroplast RNAs.     

Translational control by the poly(A) binding protein: A check for mRNA integrity

The eukaryotic mRNA 3′ poly(A) tail and the 5′ cap cooperate to synergistically enhance translation. This interaction is mediated by a ribonucleoprotein network that contains, at a minimum, the poly(A) binding protein (PABP), the cap-binding protein eIF4E, and a scaffolding protein, eIF4G. eIF4G, in turn, contains binding sites for eIF4A and eIF3, a 40S ribosome-associated initiation factor. The combined cooperative interactions within this “closed loop” mRNA among other effects enhance the affinity of eIF4E for the 5′ cap, by lowering its dissociation rate and, ultimately, facilitate the formation of 48S and 80S ribosome initiation complexes. The PABP-poly(A) interaction also stimulates initiation driven by picornavirus’ internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs), a process that requires eIF4G but not eIF4E. PABP, therefore, should be considered a canonical initiation factor, integral to the formation of the initiation complex. Poly(A)-mediated translation is subjected to regulation by the PABP-interacting proteins Paip1 and Paip2. Paip1 acts as a translational enhancer. In contrast, Paip2 strongly inhibits translation by promoting dissociation of PABP from poly(A) and by competing with eIF4G for binding to PABP. Published in Russian in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2006, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 684–693. The article is published in the original.     

The Uba2 and Ufd1 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae interact with poly(A) polymerase and affect the polyadenylation activity of cell extracts

Poly(A) polymerase is responsible for the addition of the adenylate tail to the 3′ ends of mRNA. Using the two-hybrid system, we have identified two proteins which interact specifically with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A) polymerase, Pap1. Uba2 is a homolog of ubiquitin-activating (E1) enzymes and Ufd1 is a protein whose function is probably also linked to the ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation pathway. These two proteins interact with Pap1 and with each other, but not with eight other target proteins which were tested in the two-hybrid system. The last 115 amino acids of Uba2, which contains an 82-amino acid region not present in previously characterized E1 enzymes, is sufficient for the interaction with Pap1. Both Uba2 and Ufd1 can be co-immunoprecipitated from extracts with Pap1, confirming in vitro the interaction identified by two-hybrid analysis. Depletion of Uba2 from cells produces extracts which polyadenylate precursor RNA with increased efficiency compared to extracts from nondepleted cells, while depletion of Ufd1 yields extracts which are defective in processing. These two proteins are not components of polyadenylation factors, and instead may have a role in regulating poly(A) polymerase activity. Received: 6 January 1997 / Accepted: 27 February 1997     

Cytoplasmic poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase in AEV-transformed chicken erythroblasts

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase activities were both investigated in chicken erythroblasts transformed by Avian Erythroblastosis Virus. Respectively 21% and 58% of these activities were found to be present in the post-mitochondrial supernatant (PMS). Fractionation of the PMS on sucrose gradients and poly(A⁺) mRNA detection by hybridization to [³H] poly(U) show that cytoplasmic poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is exclusively localized in free mRNP. The glycohydrolase activity sedimented mostly in the 6 S region but 1/3 of the activity was in the free mRNP zone. Seven poly(ADP-ribose) protein acceptors were identified in the PMS in the Mr 21000–120000 range. The Mr 120000 protein corresponds to automodified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. A Mr 21000 protein acceptor is abundant in PMS and a Mr 34000 is exclusively associated with ribosomes and ribosomal subunits. The existence of both poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and glycohydrolase activities in free mRNP argues in favour of a role of poly(ADP-ribosylation) in mRNP metabolism. A possible involvement of this post translational modification in the mechanisms of repression-derepression of mRNA is discussed.Abbreviations ADP-ribose adenosine (5) diphospho(5)--D ribose - poly(ADP-ribose) polymer of ADP-ribose - mRNP messenger ribonucleoprotein particles - PMSF phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride - LDS lithium dodecyl sulfate - TCA trichloroacetic acid     

Crystal structure of the human CNOT6L nuclease domain reveals strict poly(A) substrate specificity

CCR4, an evolutionarily conserved member of the CCR4–NOT complex, is the main cytoplasmic deadenylase. It contains a C‐terminal nuclease domain with homology to the endonuclease‐exonuclease‐phosphatase (EEP) family of enzymes. We have determined the high‐resolution three‐dimensional structure of the nuclease domain of CNOT6L, a human homologue of CCR4, by X‐ray crystallography using the single‐wavelength anomalous dispersion method. This first structure of a deadenylase belonging to the EEP family adopts a complete α/β sandwich fold typical of hydrolases with highly conserved active site residues similar to APE1. The active site of CNOT6L should recognize the RNA substrate through its negatively charged surface. In vitro deadenylase assays confirm the critical active site residues and show that the nuclease domain of CNOT6L exhibits full Mg²⁺‐dependent deadenylase activity with strict poly(A) RNA substrate specificity. To understand the structural basis for poly(A) RNA substrate binding, crystal structures of the CNOT6L nuclease domain have also been determined in complex with AMP and poly(A) DNA. The resulting structures suggest a molecular deadenylase mechanism involving a pentacovalent phosphate transition.     

Human Fip1 is a subunit of CPSF that binds to U-rich RNA elements and stimulates poly(A) polymerase

In mammals, polyadenylation of mRNA precursors (pre-mRNAs) by poly(A) polymerase (PAP) depends on cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF). CPSF is a multisubunit complex that binds to the canonical AAUAAA hexamer and to U-rich upstream sequence elements on the pre-mRNA, thereby stimulating the otherwise weakly active and nonspecific polymerase to elongate efficiently RNAs containing a poly(A) signal. Based on sequence similarity to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae polyadenylation factor Fip1p, we have identified human Fip1 (hFip1) and found that the protein is an integral subunit of CPSF. hFip1 interacts with PAP and has an arginine-rich RNA-binding motif that preferentially binds to U-rich sequence elements on the pre-mRNA. Recombinant hFip1 is sufficient to stimulate the in vitro polyadenylation activity of PAP in a U-rich element-dependent manner. hFip1, CPSF160 and PAP form a ternary complex in vitro, suggesting that hFip1 and CPSF160 act together in poly(A) site recognition and in cooperative recruitment of PAP to the RNA. These results show that hFip1 significantly contributes to CPSF-mediated stimulation of PAP activity.     

Insights into substrate binding and catalytic mechanism of human tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase (Tdp1) from vanadate and tungstate-inhibited structures

Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase (Tdp1) is a DNA repair enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of a phosphodiester bond between a tyrosine residue and a DNA 3'-phosphate. The only known example of such a linkage in eukaryotic cells occurs normally as a transient link between a type IB topoisomerase and DNA. Thus human Tdp1 is thought to be responsible for repairing lesions that occur when topoisomerase I becomes stalled on the DNA in the cell. Tdp1 has also been shown to remove glycolate from single-stranded DNA containing a 3'-phosphoglycolate, suggesting a role for Tdp1 in repair of free-radical mediated DNA double-strand breaks. We report the three-dimensional structures of human Tdp1 bound to the phosphate transition state analogs vanadate and tungstate. Each structure shows the inhibitor covalently bound to His263, confirming that this residue is the nucleophile in the first step of the catalytic reaction. Vanadate in the Tdp1-vanadate structure has a trigonal bipyramidal geometry that mimics the transition state for hydrolysis of a phosphodiester bond, while Tdp1-tungstate displays unusual octahedral coordination. The presence of low-occupancy tungstate molecules along the narrow groove of the substrate binding cleft is suggestive evidence that this groove binds ssDNA. In both cases, glycerol from the cryoprotectant solution became liganded to the vanadate or tungstate inhibitor molecules in a bidentate 1,2-diol fashion. These structural models allow predictions to be made regarding the specific binding mode of the substrate and the mechanism of catalysis.     

Regulatory mechanisms of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase

Here, we describe the latest developments on the mechanistic characterization of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) [EC 2.4.2.30], a DNA-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of protein-bound ADP-ribose polymers in eucaryotic chromatin. A detailed kinetic analysis of the automodification reaction of PARP in the presence of nicked dsDNA indicates that protein-poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation probably occurs via a sequential mechanism since enzyme-bound ADP-ribose chains are not reaction intermediates. The multiple enzymatic activities catalyzed by PARP (initiation, elongation, branching and self-modification) are the subject of a very complex regulatory mechanism that may involve allosterism. For instance, while the NAD+ concentration determines the average ADP-ribose polymer size (polymerization reaction), the frequency of DNA strand breaks determines the total number of ADP-ribose chains synthesized (initiation reaction). A general discussion of some of the mechanisms that regulate these multiple catalytic activities of PARP is presented below.     

PAPD5, a noncanonical poly(A) polymerase with an unusual RNA-binding motif

PAPD5 is one of the seven members of the family of noncanonical poly(A) polymerases in human cells. PAPD5 was shown to polyadenylate aberrant pre-ribosomal RNAs in vivo, similar to degradation-mediating polyadenylation by the noncanonical poly(A) polymerase Trf4p in yeast. PAPD5 has been reported to be also involved in the uridylation-dependent degradation of histone mRNAs. To test whether PAPD5 indeed catalyzes adenylation as well as uridylation of RNA substrates, we analyzed the in vitro properties of recombinant PAPD5 expressed in mammalian cells as well as in bacteria. Our results show that PAPD5 catalyzes the polyadenylation of different types of RNA substrates in vitro. Interestingly, PAPD5 is active without a protein cofactor, whereas its yeast homolog Trf4p is the catalytic subunit of a bipartite poly(A) polymerase in which a separate RNA-binding subunit is needed for activity. In contrast to the yeast protein, the C terminus of PAPD5 contains a stretch of basic amino acids that is involved in binding the RNA substrate.     

Maturation of mammalian H/ACA box snoRNAs: PAPD5-dependent adenylation and PARN-dependent trimming

Small nucleolar and small Cajal body RNAs (snoRNAs and scaRNAs) of the H/ACA box and C/D box type are generated by exonucleolytic shortening of longer precursors. Removal of the last few nucleotides at the 3' end is known to be a distinct step. We report that, in human cells, knock-down of the poly(A) specific ribonuclease (PARN), previously implicated only in mRNA metabolism, causes the accumulation of oligoadenylated processing intermediates of H/ACA box but not C/D box RNAs. In agreement with a role of PARN in snoRNA and scaRNA processing, the enzyme is concentrated in nucleoli and Cajal bodies. Oligo(A) tails are attached to a short stub of intron sequence remaining beyond the mature 3' end of the snoRNAs. The noncanonical poly(A) polymerase PAPD5 is responsible for addition of the oligo(A) tails. We suggest that deadenylation is coupled to clean 3' end trimming, which might serve to enhance snoRNA stability.     

Cooperative binding of 2,2′‐bipyridine into polynucleotide poly(A)–poly(U‐) in an alkaline aqueous solution

UV absorption data analysis has been used to evaluate equilibrium constants of the pH‐induced interaction of 2,2′‐Bipy with polyadenylnic‐polyuridylic acid in aqueous solution. The conditional probabilities hard model has been adopted in treatment of concentration diagrams calculated by the soft modelling‐based Multivariate Curve Resolution‐Alternating Least Squares approach. Intrinsic binding constant (lgK_g = 1.93), and the cooperativity parameter (ω = 340), were calculated as the best fit. The plot of the experimental binding constant versus 2,2′‐Bipy equilibrium concentration shows two modes of ligand with polymer interactions. The equilibrium hard model correctly reproduced the binding constant variations observed in the experiment. The results indicated that ligand binding in two steps is governed by a cooperative process, that is, the enhancement of deprotonated structure stability. It would appear that proposed calculation approach can be used in future combined hard modelling theoretical and soft modelling experimental works. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 99:621–627, 2013.     

Antagonistic control of flowering time by functionally specialized poly(A) polymerases in Arabidopsis thaliana

Polyadenylation is a critical 3′‐end processing step during maturation of pre‐mRNAs, and the length of the poly(A) tail affects mRNA stability, nuclear export and translation efficiency. The Arabidopsis thaliana genome encodes three canonical nuclear poly(A) polymerase (PAPS) isoforms fulfilling specialized functions, as reflected by their different mutant phenotypes. While PAPS1 affects several processes, such as the immune response, organ growth and male gametophyte development, the roles of PAPS2 and PAPS4 are largely unknown. Here we demonstrate that PAPS2 and PAPS4 promote flowering in a partially redundant manner. The enzymes act antagonistically to PAPS1, which delays the transition to flowering. The opposite flowering‐time phenotypes in paps1 and paps2 paps4 mutants are at least partly due to decreased or increased FLC activity, respectively. In contrast to paps2 paps4 mutants, plants with increased PAPS4 activity flower earlier than the wild‐type, concomitant with reduced FLC expression. Double mutant analyses suggest that PAPS2 and PAPS4 act independently of the autonomous pathway components FCA, FY and CstF64. The direct polyadenylation targets of the three PAPS isoforms that mediate their effects on flowering time do not include FLC sense mRNA and remain to be identified. Thus, our results uncover a role for canonical PAPS isoforms in flowering‐time control, raising the possibility that modulating the balance of the isoform activities could be used to fine tune the transition to flowering.     

A unique system for regulating mitochondrial mRNA poly(A) status and stability in plants

Poly(A) status is the major determinant of mRNA stability, even in endosymbiotic organelles. Poly(A) specific ribonuclease (PARN) is distributed widely among eukaryotes and has been shown to regulate the poly(A) status of cytoplasmic mRNA in various organisms. Surprisingly, our recent study revealed that PARN also directly regulates poly(A) status of mitochondrial mRNA in Arabidopsis. In this addendum, we discuss whether this mitochondrial function of PARN is common in plants and why PARN has been assigned such a unique function.     

Regulation of poly(A) polymerase activity and poly(A)+ RNA in germinated wheat embryos under conditions of pathogenesis

The induction of poly(A) polymerase was accompanied by a rise in the level of poly(A)⁺ RNA during early germination of excised wheat embryos (48 h). Fractionation of this RNA-processing enzyme by acrylamide gel electrophoresis and also by molecular sieving on Sephadex G-200 revealed a single molecular form of poly(A) polymerase with a molecular weight of 125 000. Wheat poly(A) polymerase specifically catalyzed the incorporation of [³H]AMP from [³H]ATP into the polyadenylate product only in the presence of primer RNA. Substitution of [³H]ATP by other labelled nucleoside triphosphates, such as [³H]GTP, [³H]UTP or [α-³²P]CTP in the assay mixture did not yield any labelled polynucleotide reaction product. The ³H-labelled reaction product was retained on poly(U)-cellulose affinity column and was not degraded by RNAase A and RNAase T₁ treatment. In addition, the nearest-neighbour frequency analysis of the ³²P-labelled reaction product predominantly yielded [³²P]AMP. Thus, characterization of the reaction product clearly indicated its polyadenylate nature. The average chain length of the [³H]poly(A) product was 26 nucleotides. Infection of germinating wheat embryos by a fungal pathogen (Drechslera sorokiana) brought about a severe inhibition (62–79%) of poly(A) polymerase activity. Concurrently, there was a parallel decrease (73%) in the level of poly(A)⁺ RNA. Inhibition of poly(A) polymerase activity in infected embryos could be due to enzyme inactivation, which in turn brought about a downward shift in the level of poly(A)⁺ RNA. The crude extract of the cultured pathogen contains a non-dialysable, heat-labile factor, which, along with a ligand, inactivates (65–74%) poly(A) polymerase in vitro. The fungal extracts also contained a dialysable, heat-stable stimulatory effector which activated wheat poly(A) polymerase (3.6–4.0-fold stimulation) in vitro. However, the stimulatory fungal effector was not expressed in vivo, but was detectable after the inhibitory fungal factor had been destroyed by heat-treatment in our in vitro experiments.     

Evidence of two forms of poly(A) polymerase in germinated wheat embryos and their regulation by a novel protein kinase

Two forms of poly(A) polymerase (PAPI and PAPII) from germinated wheat embryos have been resolved on DEAE-cellulose ion-exchange chromatography by a linear gradient of 0-500 mM (NH(4))(2)SO(4). Further purification shows that both forms are monomeric in nature with an identical molecular weight, approximately 65 kDa. The phosphoprotein nature of PAPI and PAPII has been established by in vivo labelling with (32)P-orthophosphate. Acid hydrolysis of both (32)P-labelled purified PAPI and PAPII has revealed that phosphorylations generally take place in serine and threonine residues. PAPI and PAPII have also been characterised with respect to V(max) and K(m) for poly(A). The V(max) and K(m) values of PAPI are 28.57 and 11.37 microg, respectively, whereas 34.48 and 7.04 microg of PAPII. In vitro dephosphorylation of the purified enzyme by alkaline phosphatase leads to a significant loss of the enzyme activity, which is regained upon phosphorylation by a 65 kDa protein kinase (PK) purified from wheat embryos. The extent of phosphorylation by protein kinase shows that PK has similar affinity towards both PAPI and PAPII, whereas the phosphate incorporation in PAPII is twofold higher than PAPI suggesting their distinct chemical nature.     

α4 phosphoprotein interacts with EDD E3 ubiquitin ligase and poly(A)‐binding protein

Mammalian α4 phosphoprotein, the homolog of yeast Tap42, is a component of the mammalian target‐of‐rapamycin (mTOR) pathway that regulates ribogenesis, the initiation of translation, and cell‐cycle progression. α4 is known to interact with the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2Ac) and to regulate PP2A activity. Using α4 as bait in yeast two‐hybrid screening of a human K562 erythroleukemia cDNA library, EDD (E3 isolated by differential display) E3 ubiquitin ligase was identified as a new protein partner of α4. EDD is the mammalian ortholog of Drosophila hyperplastic discs gene (hyd) that controls cell proliferation during development. The EDD protein contains a PABC domain that is present in poly(A)‐binding protein (PABP), suggesting that PABP may also interact with α4. PABP recruits translation factors to the poly(A)‐tails of mRNAs. In the present study, immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting (IP/IB) analyses showed a physical interaction between α4 and EDD in rat Nb2 T‐lymphoma and human MCF‐7 breast cancer cell lines. α4 also interacted with PABP in Nb2, MCF‐7 and the human Jurkat T‐leukemic and K562 myeloma cell lines. COS‐1 cells, transfected with Flag‐tagged‐pSG5‐EDD, gave a (Flag)‐EDD–α4 immunocomplex. Furthermore, deletion mutants of α4 were constructed to determine the binding site for EDD. IP/IB analysis showed that EDD bound to the C‐terminal region of α4, independent of the α4‐PP2Ac binding site. Therefore, in addition to PP2Ac, α4 interacts with EDD and PABP, suggesting its involvement in multiple steps in the mTOR pathway that leads to translation initiation and cell‐cycle progression. J. Cell. Biochem. 110: 1123–1129, 2010. Published 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.