Comet assay with nuclear extract incubation

Alkaline comet assay is a simple sensitive method for detecting DNA strand breaks. However, at the time of cell lysis, only a fraction of the entire DNA damage appears as DNA strand breaks, while some DNA strand breaks may have been rejoined and some DNA lesions may still remain unexcised. We showed that nuclear extract (NE) prepared from human cells could excise the DNA adducts induced by UVC, X-ray, and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Thus, the comet assay with NE incubation allows a closer estimation of total DNA damage. Among the human urothelial carcinoma cell lines we tested, the NE of NTUB1 cells showed higher activity in excising the DNA adducts induced by UVC, but with a lower activity in excising the DNA adducts induced by MMS than the NE of BFTC905 cells. Moreover, under the same dose of X-ray irradiation, a larger difference in total DNA damage between two cell lines was revealed in comet assay incubated with NE than without NE. Therefore, the comet assay with NE incubation may be useful in the research of cancer risk, drug resistance, and DNA repair proteins.     

Oxidatively Generated Guanine(C8)-Thymine(N3) Intrastrand Cross-links in Double-stranded DNA Are Repaired by Base Excision Repair Pathways

Oxidatively generated guanine radical cations in DNA can undergo various nucleophilic reactions including the formation of C8-guanine cross-links with adjacent or nearby N3-thymines in DNA in the presence of O₂. The G*[C8-N3]T* lesions have been identified in the DNA of human cells exposed to oxidative stress, and are most likely genotoxic if not removed by cellular defense mechanisms. It has been shown that the G*[C8-N3]T* lesions are substrates of nucleotide excision repair in human cell extracts. Cleavage at the sites of the lesions was also observed but not further investigated (Ding et al. (2012) Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2506–2517). Using a panel of eukaryotic and prokaryotic bifunctional DNA glycosylases/lyases (NEIL1, Nei, Fpg, Nth, and NTH1) and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonucleases (Apn1, APE1, and Nfo), the analysis of cleavage fragments by PAGE and MALDI-TOF/MS show that the G*[C8-N3]T* lesions in 17-mer duplexes are incised on either side of G*, that none of the recovered cleavage fragments contain G*, and that T* is converted to a normal T in the 3′-fragment cleavage products. The abilities of the DNA glycosylases to incise the DNA strand adjacent to G*, while this base is initially cross-linked with T*, is a surprising observation and an indication of the versatility of these base excision repair proteins.     

DNA 去甲基化机制的研究进展*

DNA甲基化作为动植物体内一种重要的表观遗传修饰形式,在调控基因表达、维持基因组的稳定性等方面发挥重要的生物学作用。固有DNA甲基化水平和模式的变化会导致生物的表型异常甚至死亡。而5-甲基胞嘧啶的水平和模式是由DNA甲基化和去甲基化共同决定的。DNA去甲基化可以分为主动去甲基化与被动去甲基化,而基因组甲基化模式的形成主要依赖于主动去甲基化。本文综述了生物体内DNA主动去甲基化五种潜在机制:DNA转葡糖基酶参与的碱基切除修复途径、脱氨酶参与的碱基切除修复途径、核苷酸切除修复途径、氧化作用去甲基化与水解作用去甲基化。     

天然产物产生菌自抗性中DNA损伤修复的研究进展

临床上使用的抗生素大多是由微生物次级代谢产生的天然产物及其衍生物,这类化合物可以抑制微生物的生长,具有显著的细胞毒性。产生菌在合成这些抗生素的同时,也需要通过多种自抗性机制来应对其对自身的毒害作用。本文总结了近年来DNA损伤修复途径参与的天然产物产生菌自抗性机制的研究进展,重点介绍了DNA损伤类抗生素产生菌中的碱基切除修复途径和类核苷酸切除修复途径等,并对目前DNA损伤修复抗性机制中存在的问题进行了讨论,同时对其潜在的应用进行了展望。     

Uracil‐DNA glycosylases—Structural and functional perspectives on an essential family of DNA repair enzymes

Uracil‐DNA glycosylases (UDGs) are evolutionarily conserved DNA repair enzymes that initiate the base excision repair pathway and remove uracil from DNA. The UDG superfamily is classified into six families based on their substrate specificity. This review focuses on the family I enzymes since these are the most extensively studied members of the superfamily. The structural basis for substrate specificity and base recognition as well as for DNA binding, nucleotide flipping and catalytic mechanism is discussed in detail. Other topics include the mechanism of lesion search and molecular mimicry through interaction with uracil‐DNA glycosylase inhibitors. The latest studies and findings detailing structure and function in the UDG superfamily are presented.     

DNA损伤修复机制——解读2015年诺贝尔化学奖

Tomas Lindahl, Paul Modrich和Aziz Sancar三位科学家因发现“DNA损伤修复机制”获得了2015年诺贝尔化学奖．Lindahl首次发现Escherichia Coli中参与碱基切除修复的第一个蛋白质--尿嘧啶 DNA糖基化酶（UNG）; Modrich重建了错配修复的体外系统,从大肠杆菌到哺乳动物深入探究了错配修复的机制; Sancar利用纯化的UvrA、UvrB、UvrC重建了核苷酸切除修复的关键步骤,阐述了核苷酸切除修复的分子机制．DNA损伤是由生物所处体外环境和体内因素共同导致的,面对不同种类的损伤,机体启动多种不同的修复机制修复损伤,保护基因组稳定性．这些修复机制包括：光修复(light repairing);核苷酸切除修复（nucleotide excision repair, NER）;碱基切除修复（base excision repair, BER）;错配修复（mismatch repair, MMR）;以及DNA双链断裂修复（DNA double strand breaks repair, DSBR）．其中DNA双链断裂修复又分同源重组（homologous recombination, HR）和非同源末端连接（non homologous end joining, NHEJ）两种方式．本文将对上述几种修复的机制进行总结与讨论．     

Role of excision mechanisms of DNA repair in induction of apoptosis

DNA repair and apoptosis lead to principally different final results: the first mechanism removes damages from DNA, restoring genome integrity; the second mechanism eliminates potentially dangerous cells harboring DNA lesions. The cells deficient in mismatch repair (MMR) demonstrate inceased resistance (viability) to DNA-damaging agents due to decreased ability to undergo apoptosis. This means that mechanism of MMR both restores structure of DNA and generates a signal for apoptosis. DNA breaks and single strand gaps, which are temporarily produced by excison mechanism during DNA repair, are suggested to be the initial signals for apoptosis. However pathway involved in such signaling at least partially is independent of p53 function.     

Incision of trivalent chromium [Cr(III)]-induced DNA damage by Bacillus caldotenax UvrABC endonuclease

Some hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]-containing compounds are lung carcinogens. Once within cells, Cr(VI) is reduced to trivalent chromium [Cr(III)] which displays an affinity for both DNA bases and the phosphate backbone. A diverse array of genetic lesions is produced by Cr including Cr–DNA monoadducts, DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs), DNA–Cr–protein crosslinks (DPCs), abasic sites, DNA strand breaks and oxidized bases. Despite the large amount of information available on the genotoxicity of Cr, little is known regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in the removal of these lesions from damaged DNA. Recent work indicates that nucleotide excision repair (NER) is involved in the processing of Cr–DNA adducts in human and rodent cells. In order to better understand this process at the molecular level and begin to identify the Cr–DNA adducts processed by NER, the incision of CrCl₃ [Cr(III)]-damaged plasmid DNA was studied using a thermal-resistant UvrABC NER endonuclease from Bacillus caldotenax (Bca). Treatment of plasmid DNA with Cr(III) (as CrCl₃) increased DNA binding as a function of dose. For example, at a Cr(III) concentration of 1 μM we observed 2 Cr(III)–DNA adducts per plasmid. At this same concentration of Cr(III) we found that 17% of the plasmid DNA contained ICLs (0.2 ICLs/plasmid). When plasmid DNA treated with Cr(III) (1 μM) was incubated with Bca UvrABC we observed 0.8 incisions/plasmid. The formation of endonuclease IV-sensitive abasic lesions or Fpg-sensitive oxidized DNA bases was not detected suggesting that the incision of Cr(III)-damaged plasmid DNA by UvrABC was not related to the generation of oxidized DNA damage. Taken together, our data suggest that a sub-fraction of Cr(III)–DNA adducts is recognized and processed by the prokaryotic NER machinery and that ICLs are not necessarily the sole lesions generated by Cr(III) that are substrates for NER.     

Structural insights into the first incision reaction during nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism present in all kingdoms of life. The incision reaction is a critical step for damage removal and is accomplished by the UvrC protein in eubacteria. No structural information is so far available for the 3' incision reaction. Here we report the crystal structure of the N-terminal catalytic domain of UvrC at 1.5 A resolution, which catalyzes the 3' incision reaction and shares homology with the catalytic domain of the GIY-YIG family of intron-encoded homing endonucleases. The structure reveals a patch of highly conserved residues surrounding a catalytic magnesium-water cluster, suggesting that the metal binding site is an essential feature of UvrC and all GIY-YIG endonuclease domains. Structural and biochemical data strongly suggest that the N-terminal endonuclease domain of UvrC utilizes a novel one-metal mechanism to cleave the phosphodiester bond.     

Replication-mediated disassociation of replication protein A-XPA complex upon DNA damage: implications for RPA handing off

RPA (replication protein A), the eukaryotic ssDNA (single-stranded DNA)-binding protein, participates in most cellular processes in response to genotoxic insults, such as NER (nucleotide excision repair), DNA, DSB (double-strand break) repair and activation of cell cycle checkpoint signalling. RPA interacts with XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum A) and functions in early stage of NER. We have shown that in cells the RPA-XPA complex disassociated upon exposure of cells to high dose of UV irradiation. The dissociation required replication stress and was partially attributed to tRPA hyperphosphorylation. Treatment of cells with CPT (camptothecin) and HU (hydroxyurea), which cause DSB DNA damage and replication fork collapse respectively and also leads to the disruption of RPA-XPA complex. Purified RPA and XPA were unable to form complex in vitro in the presence of ssDNA. We propose that the competition-based RPA switch among different DNA metabolic pathways regulates the dissociation of RPA with XPA in cells after DNA damage. The biological significances of RPA-XPA complex disruption in relation with checkpoint activation, DSB repair and RPA hyperphosphorylation are discussed.     

DNA damage processing at telomeres: The ends justify the means

Telomeres at chromosome ends are nucleoprotein structures consisting of tandem TTAGGG repeats and a complex of proteins termed shelterin. DNA damage and repair at telomeres is uniquely influenced by the ability of telomeric DNA to form alternate structures including loops and G-quadruplexes, coupled with the ability of shelterin proteins to interact with and regulate enzymes in every known DNA repair pathway. The role of shelterin proteins in preventing telomeric ends from being falsely recognized and processed as DNA double strand breaks is well established. Here we focus instead on recent developments in understanding the roles of shelterin proteins and telomeric DNA sequence and structure in processing genuine damage at telomeres induced by endogenous and exogenous DNA damage agents. We will highlight advances in double strand break repair, base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair at telomeres, and will discuss important questions remaining in the field.     

My Journey to DNA Repair

I completed my medical studies at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm but have always been devoted to basic research. My longstanding interest is to understand fundamental DNA repair mechanisms in the fields of cancer therapy, inherited human genetic disorders and ancient DNA. I initially measured DNA decay, including rates of base loss and cytosine deamination. I have discovered several important DNA repair proteins and determined their mechanisms of action. The discovery of uracil-DNA glycosylase defined a new category of repair enzymes with each specialized for different types of DNA damage. The base excision repair pathway was first reconstituted with human proteins in my group. Cell-free analysis for mammalian nucleotide excision repair of DNA was also developed in my laboratory. I found multiple distinct DNA ligases in mammalian cells, and led the first genetic and biochemical work on DNA ligases Ⅰ, and Ⅳ. I discovered the mammalian exonucleases DNase Ⅲ (TREX1) and IV (FEN1). Interestingly, expression of TREX1 was altered in some human autoimmune diseases. I also showed that the mutagenic DNA adduct O6-methylguanine (O6 mG) is repaired without removing the guanine from DNA, identifying a surprising mechanism by which the methyl group is transferred to a residue in the repair protein itself. A further novel process of DNA repair discovered by my research group is the action of AlkB as an iron-dependent enzyme carrying out oxidative demethylation.     

DNA decay and limited Rad53 activation after liquid holding of UV-treated nucleotide excision repair deficient S. cerevisiae cells

The DNA damage checkpoint is a surveillance mechanism activated by DNA lesions and devoted to the maintenance of genome stability. It is considered as a signal transduction cascade, involving a sensing step, the activation of a set of protein kinases and the transmission and amplification of the damage signal through several phosphorylation events. In budding yeast many players of this pathway have been identified. Recent work showed that G1 and G2 checkpoint activation in response to UV irradiation requires prior recognition and processing of UV lesions by nucleotide excision repair (NER) factors that likely recruit checkpoint proteins near the damage. However, another report suggested that NER was not required for checkpoint function. Since the functional relationship between repair mechanisms and checkpoint activation is a very important issue in the field, we analyzed, under different experimental conditions, whether lesion processing by NER is required for checkpoint activation. We found that DNA damage checkpoint can be triggered in an NER-independent manner only if cells are subjected to liquid holding after UV treatment. This incubation causes a time-dependent breakage of DNA strands in NER-deficient cells and leads to partial activation of the checkpoint kinase. The analysis of the genetic requirements for this alternative activation pathway suggest that it requires Mec1 and the Rad17 complex and that the observed DNA breaks are likely to be due to spontaneous decay of damaged DNA.     

Comet assay-based methods for measuring DNA repair <Emphasis Type="Italic">in vitro</Emphasis>; estimates of inter- and intra-individual variation

DNA repair is one of the important determinants of susceptibility to cancer. It is therefore useful to be able to measure DNA repair capacity in samples from population studies. Our aim was, first, to develop a simple comet-based in vitro assay for nucleotide excision repair (NER), similar to that already in use for base excision repair (BER), and then to apply these in vitro assays to lymphocyte samples collected on several occasions from healthy subjects, to gain an impression of the degree of intra- and inter-individual variability. The in vitro assay consists of an incubation of lymphocyte extract with substrate nucleoid DNA from cells pretreated with specific damaging agent; either photosensitiser plus light to induce 8-oxoguanine, for BER, or short wavelength ultraviolet light irradiation for NER. In the new NER assay, which requires magnesium but not adenosine triphosphate, there was significant accumulation of UV-dependent incisions during a 30-min incubation of extract with DNA. We found significant correlations between individual repair rates from samples taken on different occasions; i.e. individuals have a characteristic repair capacity. There was also significant variation between individuals, to the extent of about fourfold for BER and tenfold for NER. There was no correlation between BER and NER rates. The BER and NER assays are simple to perform and can provide valuable information in molecular epidemiological studies in which DNA instability is an endpoint.