BRCA1 facilitates microhomology-mediated end joining of DNA double strand breaks

BRCA1 is critical for the maintenance of genomic stability, in part through its interaction with the Rad50.Mre11.Nbs1 complex, which occupies a central role in DNA double strand break repair mediated by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination. BRCA1 has been shown to be required for homology-directed recombination repair. However, the role of BRCA1 in NHEJ, a critical pathway for the repair of double strand breaks and genome stability in mammalian cells, remains elusive. Here, we established a pair of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from 9.5-day-old embryos with genotypes Brca1(+/+):p53(-/-) or Brca1(-/-):p53(-/-). The Brca1(-/-):p53(-/-) MEFs appear to be extremely sensitive to ionizing radiation. The contribution of BRCA1 in NHEJ was evaluated in these cells using three different assay systems. First, transfection of a linearized plasmid in which expression of the reporter gene required precise end joining indicated that Brca1(-/-) MEFs display a moderate deficiency when compared with Brca1(+/+) cells. Second, using a retrovirus infection assay dependent on NHEJ, a 5-10-fold reduction in retroviral integration efficiency was observed in Brca1(-/-) MEFs when compared with the Brca1(+/+) MEFs. Third, Brca1(-/-) MEFs exhibited a 50-100-fold deficiency in microhomology-mediated end-joining activity of a defined chromosomal DNA double strand break introduced by a rare cutting endonuclease I-SceI. These results provide evidence that Brca1 has an essential role in microhomology-mediated end joining and suggest a novel molecular basis for its caretaker role in the maintenance of genome integrity.     

Chromosomal aberrations induced by double strand DNA breaks

It has been suggested that introduction of double strand DNA breaks (DSBs) into mammalian chromosomes can lead to gross chromosomal rearrangements through improper DNA repair. To study this phenomenon, we employed a model system in which a double strand DNA break can be produced in human cells in vivo at a predetermined location. The ensuing chromosomal changes flanking the breakage site can then be cloned and characterized. In this system, the recognition site for the I-SceI endonuclease, whose 18 bp recognition sequence is not normally found in the human genome, is placed between a strong constitutive promoter and the Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) gene, which serves as a negative selectable marker. We found that the most common mutation following aberrant DSB repair was an interstitial deletion; these deletions typically showed features of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), such as microhomologies and insertions of direct or inverted repeat sequences. We also detected more complex rearrangements, including large insertions from adjacent or distant genomic regions. The insertion events that involved distant genomic regions typically represented transcribed sequences, and included both L1 LINE elements and sequences known to be involved in genomic rearrangements. This type of aberrant repair could potentially lead to gene inactivation via deletion of coding or regulatory sequences, or production of oncogenic fusion genes via insertion of coding sequences.     

Coping with DNA double strand breaks

The repair of DNA double strand breaks (dsb) is important for maintaining the physical and genetic integrity of the genome. Moreover, in humans it is associated with the prevention of diseases such as immune deficiencies and cancer. This review briefly explores the fundamental strategies for repairing dsb, examines how cells maximize the fidelity of dsb repair in the cell cycle and discusses the requirements for dsb repair in the context of chromatin.     

Repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSB) are the most serious form of DNA damage. If not repaired they can lead to cell death. If misrepaired DSBs contribute to chromosomal aberrations and genomic instability. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is one of two major pathways for the repair of DSBs in human cells. Proteins known to be required for NHEJ include the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), XRCC4, DNA ligase IV, and Artemis. This review discusses how these and other accessory proteins may function in the repair of DSBs produced by ionizing radiation (IR) and by V(D)J recombination.     

Induction of DNA replication-mediated double strand breaks by psoralen DNA interstrand cross-links

The effect of DNA interstrand cross-links (cross-links) on DNA replication was examined with a cell-free SV40 origin-dependent DNA replication system. A defined template DNA with a single psoralen cross-link and the SV40 origin of replication was replicated by HeLa cell-free extract in the presence of SV40 large T antigen. The psoralen cross-link inhibited DNA replication by terminating chain elongation at 1-50 nucleotides before the cross-linked sites. The termination of DNA replication by the cross-links mediated the generation of double strand breaks near the cross-linked sites. These results are the first biochemical evidence of the generation of double strand breaks by DNA replication.     

Induction of DNA double strand breaks by arsenite: comparative studies with DNA breaks induced by X-rays

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cell line and two of its DNA double strand break (DSB) repair deficient mutant cell lines, xrs-5 (Ku80 mutant) and irs-20 (DNA-PKcs mutant), were treated with various concentrations of sodium arsenite for 2.5h, and the colony forming abilities were studied. The wild type cells showed the highest cell survival, while xrs-5 cells showed the lowest survival, and irs-20 cells had an intermediate survival. These results are very similar to the cell survival curves induced by X-rays in these three cell lines. Our data also show the dose dependent induction of DNA-DSBs in these cell lines exposed to arsenite. However, in order to obtain a similar cell survival in wild type cells, twice as many DNA-DSBs are necessary with arsenite exposure when compared with X-rays, suggesting that the types of DNA lesions leading to DSB induced by arsenite are different from those by X-rays. Based on these data, further mechanistic investigations including the involvement of DNA-DSB repair proteins are warranted in the recovery process from arsenic (As) exposure.     

Methoxyamine potentiates DNA single strand breaks and double strand breaks induced by temozolomide in colon cancer cells

We have previously shown that human cancer cells deficient in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) are resistant to the chemotherapeutic methylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) and can be sensitized by the base excision repair (BER) blocking agent methoxyamine (MX) [21]. To further characterize BER-mediated repair responses to methylating agent-induced DNA damage, we have now evaluated the effect of MX on TMZ-induced DNA single strand breaks (SSB) by alkaline elution and DNA double strand breaks (DSB) by pulsed field gel electrophoresis in SW480 (O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase [AGT]+, MMR wild type) and HCT116 (AGT+, MMR deficient) colon cancer cells. SSB were evident in both cell lines after a 2-h exposure to equitoxic doses of temozolomide. MX significantly increased the number of TMZ-induced DNA-SSB in both cell lines. In contrast to SSB, TMZ-induced DNA-DSB were dependent on MMR status and were time-dependent. Levels of 50 kb double stranded DNA fragments in MMR proficient cells were increased after TMZ alone or in combination with O6-benzylguanine or MX, whereas, in MMR deficient HCT116 cells, only TMZ plus MX produced significant levels of DNA-DSB. Levels of AP endonuclease, XRCC1 and polymerase beta were present in both cell lines and were not significantly altered after MX and TMZ. However, cleavage of a 30-mer double strand substrate by SW480 and HCT116 crude cell extracts was inhibited by MX plus TMZ. Thus, MX potentiation of TMZ cytotoxicity may be explained by the persistence of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites not further processed due to the presence of MX. Furthermore, in MMR-deficient, TMZ-resistant HCT116 colon cancer cells, MX potentiates TMZ cytotoxicity through formation of large DS-DNA fragmentation and subsequent apoptotic signalling.     

Processing of 3'-phosphoglycolate-terminated DNA double strand breaks by Artemis nuclease

The Artemis nuclease is required for V(D)J recombination and for repair of an as yet undefined subset of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks. To assess the possibility that Artemis acts on oxidatively modified double strand break termini, its activity toward model DNA substrates, bearing either 3'-hydroxyl or 3'-phosphoglycolate moieties, was examined. A 3'-phosphoglycolate had little effect on Artemis-mediated trimming of long 3' overhangs (> or =9 nucleotides), which were efficiently trimmed to 4-5 nucleotides. However, 3'-phosphoglycolates on overhangs of 4-5 bases promoted Artemis-mediated removal of a single 3'-terminal nucleotide, while at least 2 nucleotides were trimmed from identical hydroxyl-terminated substrates. Artemis also efficiently removed a single nucleotide from a phosphoglycolate-terminated 3-base 3' overhang, while leaving an analogous hydroxyl-terminated overhang largely intact. Such removal was completely dependent on DNA-dependent protein kinase and ATP and was largely dependent on Ku, which markedly stimulated Artemis activity toward all 3' overhangs. Together, these data suggest that efficient Artemis-mediated cleavage of 3' overhangs requires a minimum of 2 nucleotides, or a nucleotide plus a phosphoglycolate, 3' to the cleavage site, as well as 2 unpaired nucleotides 5' to the cleavage site. Shorter 3'-phosphoglycolate-terminated overhangs and blunt ends were also processed by Artemis but much more slowly. Consistent with a role for Artemis in repair of terminally blocked double strand breaks in vivo, human cells lacking Artemis exhibited hypersensitivity to x-rays, bleomycin, and neocarzinostatin, which all induce 3'-phosphoglycolate-terminated double strand breaks.     

Chromatin dynamics and the repair of DNA double strand breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise through both replication errors and from exogenous events such as exposure to ionizing radiation. DSBs are potentially lethal, and cells have evolved a highly conserved mechanism to detect and repair these lesions. This mechanism involves phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) and the loading of DNA repair proteins onto the chromatin adjacent to the DSB. It is now clear that the chromatin architecture in the region surrounding the DSB has a critical impact on the ability of cells to mount an effective DNA damage response. DSBs promote the formation of open, relaxed chromatin domains which are spatially confined to the area surrounding the break. These relaxed chromatin structures are created through the coupled action of the p400 SWI/SNF ATPase and histone acetylation by the Tip60 acetyltransferase. The resulting destabilization of nucleosomes at the DSB by Tip60 and p400 is required for ubiquitination of the chromatin by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase, and for the subsequent recruitment of the brca1 complex. Chromatin dynamics at DSBs can therefore exert a powerful influence on the process of DSB repair. Further, there is emerging evidence that the different chromatin structures in the cell, such as heterochromatin and euchromatin, utilize distinct remodeling complexes and pathways to facilitate DSB. The processing and repair of DSB is therefore critically influenced by the nuclear architecture in which the lesion arises.Key words: p400, chromatin remodeling, DNA repair, NuA4, H2AX, acetylation, nucleosome, tip60Damage to cellular DNA can occur through multiple pathways, including exposure to genotoxic agents, the production of endogenous reactive oxygen species or errors which arise during DNA replication. To combat this continuous assault on the genome, mammalian cells have evolved multiple DNA repair pathways. The most challenging lesions to repair are DSBs, which physically cleave the DNA strand. DSBs can occur through exposure to IR, the collapse of replication forks or during the processing of certain types of DNA damage. Over the last 20 years, a clear picture of how the cell detects and repairs DSBs has emerged.^1,2 The earliest event in the cell''s response to DSBs is the rapid recruitment of the ATM kinase, followed by the phosphorylation of histone H2AX (termed γH2AX) on large chromatin domains which extend for 100''s of kilobases on either side of the DSB.³ The mdc1 scaffold protein is then recruited to γH2AX,⁴ providing a docking platform for the recruitment and retention of additional DNA repair proteins, including the MRN complex, the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase and the brca1 and 53BP1 proteins, onto the chromatin at DSBs.^5–7 Eventually, this spreading of DNA repair proteins along the chromatin from the DSB leads to the formation of IRIF, which can be visualized by immunofluorescent techniques. DSBs are then repaired by NHEJ, in which broken DNA ends are directly religated, or by HR, using the undamaged sister chromatid (present during S-phase) as a template. A defining characteristic of DSB repair is the dominant role that chromatin structure plays in the detection and repair of these lesions. In this review, we will examine recent work exploring how remodeling of the chromatin structure adjacent to DSBs plays a key role in the repair of DSBs.     

BRCA1 tumor suppressor network: focusing on its tail

ABSTRACT: Germline mutations of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene are a major cause of familial breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 plays critical roles in the DNA damage response that regulates activities of multiple repair and checkpoint pathways for maintaining genome stability. The BRCT domains of BRCA1 constitute a phospho-peptide binding domain recognizing a phospho-SPxF motif (S, serine; P, proline; × varies; F, phenylalanine). The BRCT domains are frequently targeted by clinically important mutations and most of these mutations disrupt the binding surface of the BRCT domains to phosphorylated peptides. The BRCT domain and its capability to bind phosphorylated protein is required for the tumor suppressor function of BRCA1. Through its BRCT phospho-binding ability BRCA1 forms at least three mutually exclusive complexes by binding to phosphorylated proteins Abraxas, Bach1 and CTIP. The A, B and C complexes, at lease partially undertake BRCA1's role in mechanisms of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair that maintain genome stability, thus may play important roles in BRCA1's tumor suppressor function.     

Deciphering the chromatin landscape induced around DNA double strand breaks

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious forms of lesions and deciphering the details of the chromatin landscape induced around DSBs represents a great challenge for molecular biologists.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, followed by microarray hybridisation (ChIP-chip) or high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), are powerful techniques that provide high-resolution maps of protein-genome interactions. However, applying these techniques to study chromatin changes induced around DSBs was previously hindered due to a lack of suitable DSB induction techniques.

We have recently developed an experimental system utilizing a restriction enzyme fused to a modified oestrogen receptor ligand binding domain (AsiSI-ER), which generates multiple, sequence-specific and unambiguously positioned DSBs across the genome upon induction with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT) ¹. Cell lines expressing this construct represent a powerful tool to study specific chromatin changes during DSB repair, enabling high-resolution profiling of DNA repair complexes and chromatin modifications induced around DSBs. Using this system, we have recently produced the first map of gH2AX, a DSB-induced chromatin modification, on two human chromosomes and have investigated its spreading properties ¹. Here we provide additional data characterizing the cell lines, present a genome-wide profile of gH2AX obtained by ChIP-seq, and discuss the potential of our system towards investigations of previously uncharacterized aspects of DSB repair.     

A nervous predisposition to unrepaired DNA double strand breaks

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A–T) has for a long time stood apart from most other human neurodegenerative syndromes by the characteristic failure of cells derived from these patients to properly repair DNA damage-induced by ionizing radiation. The discovery of mutations in the ATM gene as being the underlying cause for A–T and the demonstration that the ATM protein functions as a DNA damage-responsive kinase has defined current research focusing on decoding how the cell responds to genotoxic stress. Yet, despite significant advances in delineating the cellular DNA damage response pathways coordinated by ATM, very little headway has been made toward understanding how loss of ATM leads to progressive cerebellar ataxia and whether this can be attributed to an underlying defect in DNA double strand break repair (DSBR). Since its identification, A–T has been used as the archetypal model for how a deficiency in DNA repair affects both the development and maintenance of the nervous and immune systems in humans as well as contributing to the process of tumourigenesis. However, following the growing availability and cost effectiveness of next generation sequencing technologies, the increasing recognition of novel human disorders associated with abnormal DNA repair has demonstrated that the neuropathology typified by A–T is an ‘exception’ rather than the ‘rule’. As a consequence, this throws into doubt the longstanding hypothesis that the neurodegeneration seen in A–T is due to the progressive loss of damaged neurons that have acquired toxic levels of unrepaired DNA lesions over time. Therefore, this review aims to address the question: Is defective DNA double strand break repair an underlying cause of neurodegeneration?     

Neighborly DISCourse: DNA double strand breaks silence transcription

Comment on: Shanbhag NM, et al. Cell 2010; 141:970-81.     

B-cell differentiation stimulated by physiologic DNA double strand breaks

Comment on: Sherman MH, et al. Mol Cell 2010; 39:873-85.     

Joining of nonhomologous DNA double strand breaks in vitro.

Extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs can efficiently join ends of duplex DNA that differ in structure and sequence. This was analysed by recircularisation of linear plasmid DNA molecules with dissimilar termini, generated by successive cuts with two different restriction enzymes within the pSP65 polylinker. Use of various enzymes provided blunt ended or 4 nucleotides long 3' and 5' protruding single strand (PSS) termini which were successfully joined in vitro in any tested combination. Sequence analysis of numerous junctions from cloned reaction products of 7 terminus combinations reveal: apart from very rare base exchanges and single nucleotide insertions less than 10% deletions (1 to 18 nucleotides long) were detected. Blunt/PSS or 3'PSS/5'PSS terminus pairs undergo simple "blunt end" joining which preserves PSS ends by fill-in. In contrast, equally polar 3'PSS/3'PSS or 5'PSS/5'PSS terminus pairs are joined by a complex mode: PSS ends overlap by a defined number of nucleotides, set by matching basepairs. Even one basematch suffices to define the setting. This then determines the final mismatch repair and fill-in pattern. We propose that yet unknown terminal DNA-binding proteins stabilize the energetically highly unfavorable configuration of single matching basepairs and help to support defined overlap structures.     

Activation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated by DNA strand break-inducing agents correlates closely with the number of DNA double strand breaks

The protein kinase ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is activated when cells are exposed to ionizing radiation (IR). It has been assumed that ATM is specifically activated by the few induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), although little direct evidence for this assumption has been presented. DSBs constitute only a few percent of the IR-induced DNA damage, whereas the more frequent single strand DNA breaks (SSBs) and base damage account for over 98% of the overall DNA damage. It is therefore unclear whether DSBs are the only IR-induced DNA lesions that activate ATM. To test directly whether or not DSBs are responsible for ATM activation, we exposed cells to drugs and radiation that produce different numbers of DSBs and SSBs. We determined the resulting ATM activation by measuring the amount of phosphorylated Chk2 and the numbers of SSBs and DSBs in the same cells after short incubation periods. We found a strong correlation between the number of DSBs and ATM activation but no correlation with the number of SSBs. In fact, hydrogen peroxide, which, similar to IR, induces DNA damage through hydroxyl radicals but fails to induce DSBs, did not activate ATM. In contrast, we found that calicheamicin-induced strand breaks activated ATM more efficiently than IR and that ATM activation correlated with the relative DSB induction by these agents. Our data indicate that ATM is specifically activated by IR-induced DSBs, with little or no contribution from SSBs and other types of DNA damage. These findings have implications for how ATM might recognize DSBs in cells.     

HP1 promotes tumor suppressor BRCA1 functions during the DNA damage response

The DNA damage response (DDR) involves both the control of DNA damage repair and signaling to cell cycle checkpoints. Therefore, unraveling the underlying mechanisms of the DDR is important for understanding tumor suppression and cellular resistance to clastogenic cancer therapeutics. Because the DDR is likely to be influenced by chromatin regulation at the sites of DNA damage, we investigated the role of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) during the DDR process. We monitored double-strand breaks (DSBs) using the γH2AX foci marker and found that depleting cells of HP1 caused genotoxic stress, a delay in the repair of DSBs and elevated levels of apoptosis after irradiation. Furthermore, we found that these defects in repair were associated with impaired BRCA1 function. Depleting HP1 reduced recruitment of BRCA1 to DSBs and caused defects in two BRCA1-mediated DDR events: (i) the homologous recombination repair pathway and (ii) the arrest of cell cycle at the G₂/M checkpoint. In contrast, depleting HP1 from cells did not affect the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway: instead it elevated the recruitment of the 53BP1 NHEJ factor to DSBs. Notably, all three subtypes of HP1 seemed to be almost equally important for these DDR functions. We suggest that the dynamic interaction of HP1 with chromatin and other DDR factors could determine DNA repair choice and cell fate after DNA damage. We also suggest that compromising HP1 expression could promote tumorigenesis by impairing the function of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor.     

PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1 (PARP-1) recognizes DNA strand interruptions in vivo and triggers its own modification as well as that of other proteins by the sequential addition of ADP-ribose to form polymers. This modification causes a release of PARP-1 from DNA ends and initiates a variety of responses including DNA repair. While PARP-1 has been firmly implicated in base excision and single strand break repair, its role in the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) remains unclear. Here, we show that PARP-1, probably together with DNA ligase III, operates in an alternative pathway of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) that functions as backup to the classical pathway of NHEJ that utilizes DNA-PKcs, Ku, DNA ligase IV, XRCC4, XLF/Cernunnos and Artemis. PARP-1 binds to DNA ends in direct competition with Ku. However, in irradiated cells the higher affinity of Ku for DSBs and an excessive number of other forms of competing DNA lesions limit its contribution to DSB repair. When essential components of the classical pathway of NHEJ are absent, PARP-1 is recruited for DSB repair, particularly in the absence of Ku and non-DSB lesions. This form of DSB repair is sensitive to PARP-1 inhibitors. The results define the function of PARP-1 in DSB repair and characterize a candidate pathway responsible for joining errors causing genomic instability and cancer.     

The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp coordinates resection at DNA double strand breaks

DNA-end resection, the generation of single-stranded DNA at DNA double strand break (DSB) ends, is critical for controlling the many cellular responses to breaks. Here we show that the conserved DNA damage checkpoint sliding clamp (the 9-1-1 complex) plays two opposing roles coordinating DSB resection in budding yeast. We show that the major effect of 9-1-1 is to inhibit resection by promoting the recruitment of Rad9^53BP1 near DSBs. However, 9-1-1 also stimulates resection by Exo1- and Dna2-Sgs1-dependent nuclease/helicase activities, and this can be observed in the absence of Rad9^53BP1. Our new data resolve the controversy in the literature about the effect of the 9-1-1 complex on DSB resection. Interestingly, the inhibitory role of 9-1-1 on resection is not observed near uncapped telomeres because less Rad9^53BP1 is recruited near uncapped telomeres. Thus, 9-1-1 both stimulates and inhibits resection and the effects of 9-1-1 are modulated by different regions of the genome. Our experiments illustrate the central role of the 9-1-1 checkpoint sliding clamp in the DNA damage response network that coordinates the response to broken DNA ends. Our results have implications in all eukaryotic cells.