The Fanconi anemia pathway and DNA interstrand cross-link repair

Fanconi anemia (FA) is an autosomal or X-linked recessive disorder characterized by chromosomal instability, bone marrow failure, cancer susceptibility, and a profound sensitivity to agents that produce DNA interstrand cross-link (ICL). To date, 15 genes have been identified that, when mutated, result in FA or an FA-like syndrome. It is believed that cellular resistance to DNA interstrand cross-linking agents requires all 15 FA or FA-like proteins. Here, we review our current understanding of how these FA proteins participate in ICL repair and discuss the molecular mechanisms that regulate the FA pathway to maintain genome stability.     

DNA interstrand cross-link repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA interstrand cross-links (ICL) present a formidable challenge to the cellular DNA repair apparatus. For Escherichia coli, a pathway which combines nucleotide excision repair (NER) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) to eliminate ICL has been characterized in detail, both genetically and biochemically. Mechanisms of ICL repair in eukaryotes have proved more difficult to define, primarily as a result of the fact that several pathways appear compete for ICL repair intermediates, and also because these competing activities are regulated in the cell cycle. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has proven a powerful tool for dissecting ICL repair. Important roles for NER, HRR and postreplication/translesion synthesis pathways have all been identified. Here we review, with reference to similarities and differences in higher eukaryotes, what has been discovered to date concerning ICL repair in this simple eukaryote.     

DNA interstrand crosslink repair during G1 involves nucleotide excision repair and DNA polymerase zeta

The repair mechanisms acting on DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) in eukaryotes are poorly understood. Here, we provide evidence for a pathway of ICL processing that uses components from both nucleotide excision repair (NER) and translesion synthesis (TLS) and predominates during the G1 phase of the yeast cell cycle. Our results suggest that repair is initiated by the NER apparatus and is followed by a thwarted attempt at gap-filling by the replicative Polymerase delta, which likely stalls at the site of the remaining crosslinked oligonucleotide. This in turn leads to ubiquitination of PCNA and recruitment of the damage-tolerant Polymerase zeta that can perform TLS. The ICL repair factor Pso2 acts downstream of the incision step and is not required for Polymerase zeta activation. We show that this combination of NER and TLS is the only pathway of ICL repair available to the cell in G1 phase and is essential for viability in the presence of DNA crosslinks.     

Mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair proteins cooperate in the recognition of DNA interstrand crosslinks

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are among the most cytotoxic types of DNA damage, thus ICL-inducing agents such as psoralen, are clinically useful chemotherapeutics. Psoralen-modified triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) have been used to target ICLs to specific genomic sites to increase the selectivity of these agents. However, how TFO-directed psoralen ICLs (Tdp-ICLs) are recognized and processed in human cells is unclear. Previously, we reported that two essential nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein complexes, XPA–RPA and XPC–RAD23B, recognized ICLs in vitro, and that cells deficient in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) complex MutSβ were sensitive to psoralen ICLs. To further investigate the role of MutSβ in ICL repair and the potential interaction between proteins from the MMR and NER pathways on these lesions, we performed electrophoretic mobility-shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of MutSβ and NER proteins with Tdp-ICLs. We found that MutSβ bound to Tdp-ICLs with high affinity and specificity in vitro and in vivo, and that MutSβ interacted with XPA–RPA or XPC–RAD23B in recognizing Tdp-ICLs. These data suggest that proteins from the MMR and NER pathways interact in the recognition of ICLs, and provide a mechanistic link by which proteins from multiple repair pathways contribute to ICL repair.     

Tip60 is required for DNA interstrand cross-link repair in the Fanconi anemia pathway

The disease Fanconi anemia is a genome instability syndrome characterized by cellular sensitivity to DNA interstrand cross-linking agents, manifest by decreased cellular survival and chromosomal aberrations after such treatment. There are at least 13 proteins acting in the pathway, with the FANCD2 protein apparently functioning as a late term effecter in the maintenance of genome stability. We find that the chromatin remodeling protein, Tip60, interacts directly with the FANCD2 protein in a yeast two-hybrid system. This interaction has been confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization using both endogenous and epitope-tagged FANCD2 and Tip60 from human cells. The observation of decreased cellular survival after exposure to mitomycin C in normal fibroblasts depleted for Tip60 indicates a direct function in interstrand cross-link repair. The coincident function of Tip60 and FANCD2 in one pathway is supported by the finding that depletion of Tip60 in Fanconi anemia cells does not increase sensitivity to DNA cross-links. However, depletion of Tip60 did not reduce monoubiquitination of FANCD2 or its localization to nuclear foci following DNA damage. The observations indicate that Fanconi anemia proteins act in concert with chromatin remodeling functions to maintain genome stability after DNA cross-link damage.     

Mechanism and regulation of incisions during DNA interstrand cross-link repair

A critical step in DNA interstrand cross-link repair is the programmed collapse of replication forks that have stalled at an ICL. This event is regulated by the Fanconi anemia pathway, which suppresses bone marrow failure and cancer. In this perspective, we focus on the structure of forks that have stalled at ICLs, how these structures might be incised by endonucleases, and how incision is regulated by the Fanconi anemia pathway.     

DNA repair defects channel interstrand DNA cross-links into alternate recombinational and error-prone repair pathways

The repair of psoralen interstrand cross-links in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves the DNA repair groups nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR), and post-replication repair (PRR). In repair-proficient yeast cells cross-links induce double-strand breaks, in an NER-dependent process; the double-strand breaks are then repaired by HR. An alternate error-prone repair pathway generates mutations at cross-link sites. We have characterized the repair of plasmid molecules carrying a single psoralen cross-link, psoralen monoadduct, or double-strand break in yeast cells with deficiencies in NER, HR, or PRR genes, measuring the repair efficiencies and the levels of gene conversions, crossing over, and mutations. Strains with deficiencies in the NER genes RAD1, RAD3, RAD4, and RAD10 had low levels of cross-link-induced recombination but higher mutation frequencies than repair-proficient cells. Deletion of the HR genes RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, RAD55, and RAD57 also decreased induced recombination and increased mutation frequencies above those of NER-deficient yeast. Strains lacking the PRR genes RAD5, RAD6, and RAD18 did not have any cross-link-induced mutations but showed increased levels of recombination; rad5 and rad6 cells also had altered patterns of cross-link-induced gene conversion in comparison with repair-proficient yeast. Our observations suggest that psoralen cross-links can be repaired by three pathways: an error-free recombinational pathway requiring NER and HR and two PRR-dependent error-prone pathways, one NER-dependent and one NER-independent.     

Defining the roles of nucleotide excision repair and recombination in the repair of DNA interstrand cross-links in mammalian cells

The mechanisms by which DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are repaired in mammalian cells are unclear. Studies in bacteria and yeasts indicate that both nucleotide excision repair (NER) and recombination are required for their removal and that double-strand breaks are produced as repair intermediates in yeast cells. The role of NER and recombination in the repair of ICLs induced by nitrogen mustard (HN2) was investigated using Chinese hamster ovary mutant cell lines. XPF and ERCC1 mutants (defective in genes required for NER and some types of recombination) and XRCC2 and XRCC3 mutants (defective in RAD51-related homologous recombination genes) were highly sensitive to HN2. Cell lines defective in other genes involved in NER (XPB, XPD, and XPG), together with a mutant defective in nonhomologous end joining (XRCC5), showed only mild sensitivity. In agreement with their extreme sensitivity, the XPF and ERCC1 mutants were defective in the incision or "unhooking" step of ICL repair. In contrast, the other mutants defective in NER activities, the XRCC2 and XRCC3 mutants, and the XRCC5 mutant all showed normal unhooking kinetics. Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were found to be induced following nitrogen mustard treatment. DSB induction and repair were normal in all the NER mutants, including XPF and ERCC1. The XRCC2, XRCC3, and XRCC5 mutants also showed normal induction kinetics. The XRCC2 and XRCC3 homologous recombination mutants were, however, severely impaired in the repair of DSBs. These results define a role for XPF and ERCC1 in the excision of ICLs, but not in the recombinational components of cross-link repair. In addition, homologous recombination but not nonhomologous end joining appears to play an important role in the repair of DSBs resulting from nitrogen mustard treatment.     

The eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair pathway

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most versatile mechanism of DNA repair, recognizing and dealing with a variety of helix-distorting lesions, such as the UV-induced photoproducts cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine 6-4 pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4 PPs). In this review, we describe the main protein players and the different sequential steps of the eukaryotic NER mechanism in human cells, from lesion recognition to damage removal and DNA synthesis. Studies on the dynamics of protein access to the damaged site, and the kinetics of lesion removal contribute to the knowledge of how the cells respond to genetic insult. DNA lesions as well as NER factors themselves are also implicated in changes in cell metabolism, influencing cell cycle progression or arrest, apoptosis and genetic instability. These changes are related to increased mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Finally, the recent collection of genomic data allows one to recognize the high conservation and the evolution of eukaryotic NER. The distribution of NER orthologues in different organisms, from archaea to the metazoa, displays challenging observations. Some of NER proteins are widespread in nature, probably representing ancient DNA repair proteins, which are candidates to participate in a primitive NER mechanism.     

The role of BRCA2 in replication-coupled DNA interstrand cross-link repair in vitro

Using a defined substrate DNA with a single psoralen interstrand cross-link (ICL), we studied the molecular mechanism of human ICL repair. In vitro ICL repair by human extracts is dependent on replication and is a largely error-free process. Extracts from a human BRCA2-defective mutant cell line, CAPAN-1, are severely compromised in ICL repair. Specifically, 'unhooked' but not fully repaired products accumulate in the reaction with CAPAN-1, and transient expression of BRCA2 in CAPAN-1 restores repair activity. Together, these results reveal that BRCA2 participates in repair of replication-mediated double-strand breaks generated when replication forks encounter ICLs. We also show that nucleotide excision repair is essential for the removal of the lesion left behind on one strand after unhooking. This study provides new mechanistic insights into the repair of ICLs in human cells.     

DNA polymerase I-mediated translesion synthesis in RecA-independent DNA interstrand cross-link repair in E. coli

DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are mainly repaired by the combined action of nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination in E. coli. Genetic data also suggest the existence of a nucleotide excision repair-dependent, homologous recombination-independent ICL repair pathway. The involvement of translesion synthesis in this pathway has been postulated; however, the molecular mechanism of this pathway is not understood. To examine the role of translesion synthesis in ICL repair, we generated a defined substrate with a single psoralen ICL that mimics a postincision structure generated by nucleotide excision repair. We demonstrated that the Klenow fragment (DNA polymerase I) performs translesion synthesis on this model substrate. This in vitro translesion synthesis assay will help in understanding the basic mechanism of a postincision translesion synthesis process in ICL repair.     

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision DNA repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly versatile DNA repair process. Its ability to repair a large number of different damages with the same subset of recognition factors requires structural tools for damage recognition that are both broad and very accurate. Over the past few years detailed structural information on damage recognition factors from eukaryotic and prokaryotic NER has emerged. These structures shed light on the toolkit utilized in the damage recognition process and help explain the broad substrate specificity of NER.     

Initiation of DNA interstrand cross-link repair in humans: the nucleotide excision repair system makes dual incisions 5' to the cross-linked base and removes a 22- to 28-nucleotide-long damage-free strand.

Most DNA repair mechanisms rely on the redundant information inherent to the duplex to remove damaged nucleotides and replace them with normal ones, using the complementary strand as a template. Interstrand cross-links pose a unique challenge to the DNA repair machinery because both strands are damaged. To study the repair of interstrand cross-links by mammalian cells, we tested the activities of cell extracts of wild-type or excision repair-defective rodent cell lines and of purified human excision nuclease on a duplex with a site-specific cross-link. We found that in contrast to monoadducts, which are removed by dual incisions bracketing the lesion, the cross-link causes dual incisions, both 5' to the cross-link in one of the two strands. The net result is the generation of a 22- to 28-nucleotide-long gap immediately 5' to the cross-link. This gap may act as a recombinogenic signal to initiate cross-link removal.     

Syntheses of DNA duplexes containing a C-C interstrand cross-link

Short DNA duplexes that contain a N4C-ethyl-N4C interstrand cross-link were prepared on controlled pore glass supports using a DNA synthesizer. The C-C cross-link was introduced via a convertible nucleoside on the support or by using a protected C-C cross-link phosphoramidite. An orthogonal protection scheme allowed selective chain growth in either a 3'-->5' or 5'-->3' direction. The cross-linked duplexes were purified by HPLC and characterized by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and/or by enzymatic digestion.     

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is found throughout nature, in eubacteria, eukaryotes and archaea. In human cells it is the main pathway for the removal of damage caused by UV light, but it also acts on a wide variety of other bulky helix-distorting lesions caused by chemical mutagens. An ongoing challenge is to understand how a site of DNA damage is located during NER and distinguished from non-damaged sites. This article reviews information on damage recognition in mammalian cells and the bacterium Escherichia coli. In mammalian cells the XPC-hHR23B, XPA, RPA and TFIIH factors may all have a role in damage recognition. XPC-hHR23B has the strongest affinity for damaged DNA in some assays, as does the similar budding yeast complex Rad4-Rad23. There is current discussion as to whether XPC or XPA acts first in the repair process to recognise damage or distortions. TFIIH may play a role in distinguishing the damaged strand from the non-damaged one, if translocation along a DNA strand by the TFIIH DNA helicases is interrupted by encountering a lesion. The recognition and incision steps of human NER use 15 to 18 polypeptides, whereas E. coli requires only three proteins to obtain a similar result. Despite this, many remarkable similarities in the NER mechanism have emerged between eukaryotes and bacteria. These include use of a distortion-recognition factor, a strand separating helicase to create an open preincision complex, participation of structure-specific endonucleases and the lack of a need for certain factors when a region containing damage is already sufficiently distorted.     

DNA repair in higher plants; photoreactivation is the major DNA repair pathway in non-proliferating cells while excision repair (nucleotide excision repair and base excision repair) is active in proliferating cells

We investigated expression patterns of DNA repair genes such as the CPD photolyase, UV-DDB1, CSB, PCNA, RPA32 and FEN-1 genes by northern hybridization analysis and in situ hybridization using a higher plant, rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare). We found that all the genes tested were expressed in tissues rich in proliferating cells, but only CPD photolyase was expressed in non-proliferating tissue such as the mature leaves and elongation zone of root. The removal of DNA damage, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and (6–4) photoproducts, in both mature leaves and the root apical meristem (RAM) was observed after UV irradiation under light. In the dark, DNA damage in mature leaves was not repaired efficiently, but that in the RAM was removed rapidly. Using a rice 22K custom oligo DNA microarray, we compared global gene expression patterns in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) and mature leaves. Most of the excision repair genes were more strongly expressed in SAM. These results suggested that photoreactivation is the major DNA repair pathway for the major UV-induced damage in non-proliferating cells, while both photoreactivation and excision repair are active in proliferating cells.