Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD5 influences the excision repair of DNA minor groove adducts

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the primary pathway for the removal of DNA adducts that distort the double helix. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae the RAD6 epistasis group defines a more poorly characterized set of DNA damage response pathways, believed to be distinct from NER. Here we show that the elimination of the DNA minor groove adducts formed by an important class of anticancer antibiotic (CC-1065 family) requires NER factors in S. cerevisiae. We also demonstrate that the elimination of this class of minor groove adduct from the active MFA2 gene depends upon functional Rad18 and Rad6. This is most clear for the repair of adducts on the transcribed strand, where an absolute requirement for Rad6 and Rad18 was seen. Further experiments revealed that a specific RAD6-RAD18-controlled subpathway, the RAD5 branch, mediates these events. Cells disrupted for rad5 are highly sensitive to this minor groove binding agent, and rad5 cells exhibit an in vivo adduct elimination defect indistinguishable from that seen in rad6 and rad18 cells as well as in NER-defective cells. Our results indicate that the RAD5 subpathway may interact with NER factors during the repair of certain DNA adducts.     

The RAD7 and RAD16 genes, which are essential for pyrimidine dimer removal from the silent mating type loci, are also required for repair of the nontranscribed strand of an active gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The rad16 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was previously shown to be impaired in removal of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers from the silent mating-type loci (D. D. Bang, R. A. Verhage, N. Goosen, J. Brouwer, and P. van de Putte, Nucleic Acids Res. 20:3925-3931, 1992). Here we show that rad7 as well as rad7 rad16 double mutants have the same repair phenotype, indicating that the RAD7 and RAD16 gene products might operate in the same nucleotide excision repair subpathway. Dimer removal from the genome overall is essentially incomplete in these mutants, leaving about 20 to 30% of the DNA unrepaired. Repair analysis of the transcribed RPB2 gene shows that the nontranscribed strand is not repaired at all in rad7 and rad16 mutants, whereas the transcribed strand is repaired in these mutants at a fast rate similar to that in RAD+ cells. When the results obtained with the RPB2 gene can be generalized, the RAD7 and RAD16 proteins not only are essential for repair of silenced regions but also function in repair of nontranscribed strands of active genes in S. cerevisiae. The phenotype of rad7 and rad16 mutants closely resembles that of human xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XP-C) cells, suggesting that RAD7 and RAD16 in S. cerevisiae function in the same pathway as the XPC gene in human cells. RAD4, which on the basis of sequence homology has been proposed to be the yeast XPC counterpart, seems to be involved in repair of both inactive and active yeast DNA, challenging the hypothesis that RAD4 and XPC are functional homologs.     

Two budding yeast RAD4 homologs in fission yeast play different roles in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage

We have identified two fission yeast homologs of budding yeast Rad4 and human xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XP-C) correcting protein, designated Rhp4A and Rhp4B. Here we show that the rhp4 genes encode NER factors that are required for UV-induced DNA damage repair in fission yeast. The rhp4A-deficient cells but not the rhp4B-deficient cells are sensitive to UV irradiation. However, the disruption of both rhp4A and rhp4B resulted in UV sensitivity that was greater than that of the rhp4A-deficient cells, revealing that Rhp4B plays a role in DNA repair on its own. Fission yeast has two pathways to repair photolesions on DNA, namely, nucleotide excision repair (NER) and UV-damaged DNA endonuclease-dependent excision repair (UVER). Studies with the NER-deficient rad13 and the UVER-deficient (Delta)uvde mutants showed the two rhp4 genes are involved in NER and not UVER. Assessment of the ability of the various mutants to remove cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) from the rbp2 gene locus indicated that Rhp4A is involved in the preferential repair of lesions on the transcribed DNA strand and plays the major role in fission yeast NER. Rhp4B in contrast acts as an accessory protein in non-transcribed strand (NTS) repair.     

Excision repair of nitrogen mustard-DNA adducts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The bifunctional alkylating anticancer drug nitrogen mustard forms a variety of DNA lesions, including monoadducts and intrastrand and interstrand crosslinks. Although it is known that nucleotide excision repair (NER) is important in processing these adducts, the role of the other principal excision repair pathway, base excision repair (BER) is less well defined. Using isogenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains disrupted for a variety of NER and BER genes we have examined the relative importance of the two pathways in the repair of nitrogen mustard adducts. As expected, NER defective cells (rad4 and rad14 strains) are extremely sensitive to the drug. One of the BER mutants, a 3-methyladenine glycosylase defective (mag1) strain also shows significant hypersensitivity. Using a rad4/mag1 double mutant it is shown that the two excision repair pathways are epistatic to each other for nitrogen mustard sensitivity. Furthermore, both rad14 and mag1 disruptants show elevated levels of nitrogen mustard-induced forward mutation. Measurements of repair rates of nitrogen mustard N-alkylpurine adducts in the highly transcribed RPB2 gene demonstrate defects in the processing of mono-adducts in rad4, rad14 and mag1 strains. However, there are differences in the kinetics of adduct removal in the NER mutants compared to the mag1 strain. In the mag1 strain significant repair occurs within 1 h with evidence of enhanced repair on the transcribed strand. Adducts however accumulate at later times in this strain. In contrast, in the NER mutants repair is only evident at times greater than 1 h. In a mag1/rad4 double mutant damage accumulates with no evidence of repair. Comparison of the rates of repair in this gene with those in a different genomic region indicate that the contributions of NER and BER to the repair of nitrogen mustard adducts may not be the same genome wide.