csi2p modulates microtubule dynamics and organizes the bipolar spindle for chromosome segregation

Proper chromosome segregation is of paramount importance for proper genetic inheritance. Defects in chromosome segregation can lead to aneuploidy, which is a hallmark of cancer cells. Eukaryotic chromosome segregation is accomplished by the bipolar spindle. Additional mechanisms, such as the spindle assembly checkpoint and centromere positioning, further help to ensure complete segregation fidelity. Here we present the fission yeast csi2⁺. csi2p localizes to the spindle poles, where it regulates mitotic microtubule dynamics, bipolar spindle formation, and subsequent chromosome segregation. csi2 deletion (csi2Δ) results in abnormally long mitotic microtubules, high rate of transient monopolar spindles, and subsequent high rate of chromosome segregation defects. Because csi2Δ has multiple phenotypes, it enables estimates of the relative contribution of the different mechanisms to the overall chromosome segregation process. Centromere positioning, microtubule dynamics, and bipolar spindle formation can all contribute to chromosome segregation. However, the major determinant of chromosome segregation defects in fission yeast may be microtubule dynamic defects.     

Achiasmate Segregation of a B Chromosome from the X Chromosome in Two Species of Psyllids (Psylloidea, Homoptera)

The segregation of a B chromosome from the X chromosome was studied in male meiosis in two psyllid species, Rhinocola aceris (L.) and Psylla foersteri (Flor.) (Psylloidea, Homoptera). The frequency of segregation was determined from cells at metaphase II. In R. aceris, the B chromosome was mitotically stable and segregated quite regularly from the X chromosome in four geographically distant populations, while it showed less regular, but preferential segregation in one population. This was attributed to the presence of B chromosome variants that differ in their ability to interact with the X chromosome in segregation. In P. foersteri, the B chromosome was mitotically unstable and segregated preferentially from the X chromosome in spermatocyte cysts, which displayed one B chromosome in every cell. Behaviour of the B chromosome and X chromosome univalents during meiotic prophase and at metaphase I in R. aceris, and during anaphase I in P. foersteri suggested that the regular segregation resulted from the incorporation of B chromosomes in achiasmate segregation mechanisms with the X chromosome in the place occupied by the Y chromosome in species with XY system. The regular segregation of a B chromosome from the X chromosome may obscure the distinction of a B chromosome and an achiasmate Y chromosome in some cases. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The Origin of the Achiasmatic XY Sex Chromosome System in Cacopsylla peregrina (Frst.) (Psylloidea, Homoptera)

The status of an extra univalent, if it is a B chromosome or an achiasmatic Y chromosome, associating with the X chromosome in male meiosis of Cacopsylla peregrina (Frst.) (Homoptera, Psylloidea) was analysed. One extra univalent was present in all males collected from three geographically well separated populations, it was mitotically stable, and showed precise segregation from the X chromosome. These findings led us to propose that the univalent represents in fact a Y chromosome. The behaviour of the X and Y chromosomes during meiotic prophase suggested that their regular segregation was based on an achiasmatic segregation mechanism characterised by a 'touch and go' pairing of segregating chromosomes at metaphase I. To explain the formation of the achiasmatic Y within an insect group with X0 sex chromosome system, it was suggested that the Y chromosome has evolved from a mitotically stable B chromosome that was first integrated into an achiasmatic segregation system with the X chromosome, and has later become fixed in the karyotype as a Y chromosome.     

Basic mechanism of eukaryotic chromosome segregation

We now have firm evidence that the basic mechanism of chromosome segregation is similar among diverse eukaryotes as the same genes are employed. Even in prokaryotes, the very basic feature of chromosome segregation has similarities to that of eukaryotes. Many aspects of chromosome segregation are closely related to a cell cycle control that includes stage-specific protein modification and proteolysis. Destruction of mitotic cyclin and securin leads to mitotic exit and separase activation, respectively. Key players in chromosome segregation are SMC-containing cohesin and condensin, DNA topoisomerase II, APC/C ubiquitin ligase, securin-separase complex, aurora passengers, and kinetochore microtubule destabilizers or regulators. In addition, the formation of mitotic kinetochore and spindle apparatus is absolutely essential. The roles of principal players in basic chromosome segregation are discussed: most players have interphase as well as mitotic functions. A view on how the centromere/kinetochore is formed is described.     

The chromosome cycle of prokaryotes

In both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, chromosomal DNA undergoes replication, condensation–decondensation and segregation, sequentially, in some fixed order. Other conditions, like sister‐chromatid cohesion (SCC), may span several chromosomal events. One set of these chromosomal transactions within a single cell cycle constitutes the ‘chromosome cycle’. For many years it was generally assumed that the prokaryotic chromosome cycle follows major phases of the eukaryotic one: –replication–condensation–segregation–(cell division)–decondensation–, with SCC of unspecified length. Eventually it became evident that, in contrast to the strictly consecutive chromosome cycle of eukaryotes, all stages of the prokaryotic chromosome cycle run concurrently. Thus, prokaryotes practice ‘progressive’ chromosome segregation separated from replication by a brief SCC, and all three transactions move along the chromosome at the same fast rate. In other words, in addition to replication forks, there are ‘segregation forks’ in prokaryotic chromosomes. Moreover, the bulk of prokaryotic DNA outside the replication–segregation transition stays compacted. I consider possible origins of this concurrent replication–segregation and outline the ‘nucleoid administration’ system that organizes the dynamic part of the prokaryotic chromosome cycle.     

Interaction of B chromosomes with A or B chromosomes in segregation in insects

Additional or B chromosomes not belonging to the regular karyotype of a species are found in many animal and plant groups. They form a highly heterogeneous group with respect to their morphology and behaviour both in mitosis and meiosis. Achiasmatic mechanisms that ensure the segregation of a B chromosome from another B chromosome or from an A chromosome are reviewed. An achiasmatic mechanism characterized by the "distance pairing" of segregating univalents at metaphase I was found to be responsible for the preferential segregation of B chromosome univalents in Hemerobius marginatus L. (Neuroptera), and a mechanism characterized by the "touch and go pairing" of segregating univalents was responsible for the highly regular segregation of a B chromosome and the X chromosome in Rhinocola aceris (L.) (Psylloidea, Homoptera). The latter mechanism resulted in the integration of a B chromosome to the A chromosome set as a Y chromosome in a psyllid species Cacopsylla peregrina (Frst.). Furthermore, B chromosomes can disturb the regular segregation of the achiasmatic X and Y chromosomes resulting in the formation of X0/XY polymorphism in a population, which might precede the loss of the Y chromosome. The absence of observations on accurately functioning achiasmatic segregation mechanisms in grasshoppers (Orthoptera) was attributed to the X and B chromosomes, which re-orient one or several times during metaphase I. Apparently, these re-orientations mask any achiasmatic segregation mechanism that might operate during meiotic prophase in these insects.     

Classification of chromosome segregation errors in cancer

Abnormal chromosome segregation at mitosis is one way by which neoplastic cells accumulate the many genetic abnormalities required for tumour development. In this paper, a straightforward morphology-based classification of chromosome segregation errors in cancer is suggested. This classification distinguishes between abnormalities in spindle symmetry (spindle multipolarity, size-asymmetry of ana-telophase poles) and abnormalities in sister chromatid segregation (chromosome bridges, chromatid bridges, chromosome lagging, acentric fragment lagging). Often, these categories of errors must be combined to accurately describe the events in a single abnormal mitotic cell. The suggested categories can to some extent be distinguished by standard chromatin staining. However, labelling of abnormal mitotic figures by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence enhances the accuracy of classification and also allows visualisation of the segregation of individual chromosomes, making it possible to detect non-disjunction also in the absence of gross alterations in mitotic morphology. Further characterisation of the molecular alterations leading to abnormal chromosome segregation together with the current developments in nano-level and real-time imaging will undoubtedly lead to an improved understanding of chromosome dynamics in cancer cells. Any morphology-based classification of chromosome segregation errors in cancer must therefore be taken as provisional, anticipating a satisfactory integration of morphology and molecular biology.     

Normal X chromosome induced reversion in the direction of chromosome segregation in mouse-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids

The effect of a normal mouse X chromosome on the chromosome segregation of mouse-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids was determined by (i) producing hybrids between the mouse sarcoma line CMS4 and a microcell hybrid (mfe4) of the hamster line E36, containing a mouse X chromosome from a normal cell; (ii) isolating hybrids between CMS4 and a 6-thioguanine selected (X minus) mfe4 subpopulation; (iii) comparing the direction of segregation in the two sets of hybrids. It was found that the normal X chromosome, like the X chromosomes from two MCA-transformed sarcoma lines reported previously [9], has the ability to switch the chromosome segregation of mouse-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids. We conclude that the reversal in chromosome segregation is mediated by factors located on the X chromosome. We designate these genetic elements as segregation reversal genes or sr genes.     

SMC and the bactofilin/PadC scaffold have distinct yet redundant functions in chromosome segregation and organization in Myxococcus xanthus

In bacteria, ParABS systems and structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) condensin-like complexes are important for chromosome segregation and organization. The rod-shaped Myxococcus xanthus cells have a unique chromosome arrangement in which a scaffold composed of the BacNOP bactofilins and PadC positions the essential ParB∙parS segregation complexes and the DNA segregation ATPase ParA in the subpolar regions. We identify the Smc and ScpAB subunits of the SMC complex in M. xanthus and demonstrate that SMC is conditionally essential, with Δsmc or ΔscpAB mutants being temperature sensitive. Inactivation of SMC caused defects in chromosome segregation and organization. Lack of the BacNOP/PadC scaffold also caused chromosome segregation defects but this scaffold is not essential for viability. Inactivation of SMC was synthetic lethal with lack of the BacNOP/PadC scaffold. Lack of SMC interfered with formation of the BacNOP/PadC scaffold while lack of this scaffold did not interfere with chromosome association by SMC. Altogether, our data support that three systems function together to enable chromosome segregation in M. xanthus. ParABS constitutes the basic and essential machinery. SMC and the BacNOP/PadC scaffold have different yet redundant roles in chromosome segregation with SMC supporting individualization of daughter chromosomes and BacNOP/PadC making the ParABS system operate more robustly.     

Condensin restructures chromosomes in preparation for meiotic divisions

The production of haploid gametes from diploid germ cells requires two rounds of meiotic chromosome segregation after one round of replication. Accurate meiotic chromosome segregation involves the remodeling of each pair of homologous chromosomes around the site of crossover into a highly condensed and ordered structure. We showed that condensin, the protein complex needed for mitotic chromosome compaction, restructures chromosomes during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. In particular, condensin promotes both meiotic chromosome condensation after crossover recombination and the remodeling of sister chromatids. Condensin helps resolve cohesin-independent linkages between sister chromatids and alleviates recombination-independent linkages between homologues. The safeguarding of chromosome resolution by condensin permits chromosome segregation and is crucial for the formation of discrete, individualized bivalent chromosomes.     

Genetic dissection of centromere function.

A system to detect a minimal function of Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeres in vivo has been developed. Centromere DNA mutants have been examined and found to be active in a plasmid copy number control assay in the absence of segregation. The experiments allow the identification of a minimal centromere unit, CDE III, independently of its ability to mediate chromosome segregation. Centromere-mediated plasmid copy number control correlates with the ability of CDE III to assemble a DNA-protein complex. Cells forced to maintain excess copies of CDE III exhibit increased loss of a nonessential artificial chromosome. Thus, segregationally impaired centromeres can have negative effects in trans on chromosome segregation. The use of a plasmid copy number control assay has allowed assembly steps preceding chromosome segregation to be defined.     

Linkage and segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster

Segregation distortion is caused by a group of genetic elements in and near the centric heterochromatin of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster. These elements promote their preferential recovery in heterozygous males by rendering sperm bearing the homologous chromosome dysfunctional. Previous work has shown that numerous Y-autosome translocations are associated with the suppression of the segregation distorter phenotype. The present study examined the effects of translocations between the major autosomes upon the expression of segregation distortion. Autosomal translocations involving either the segregation distorter chromosome or its sensitive homologue had no significant effect upon the expression of segregation distortion. These results argue that linkage arrangement per se may not have a major effect on segregation distortion. The suppression of SD by specific Y-autosomal translocations may be due to the disruption of elements on the Y chromosome that are important for the expression of SD.     

Chromosome loss is responsible for segregation at the HPRT locus in Chinese hamster cell hybrids

The phenomenon of segregation of gene expression has been examined in intraspecific somatic cell hybrids. Specifically, segregation at the hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) locus has been studied in hybrids of Chinese hamster cell lines. The role of chromosome segregation, or other chromosomal events has been assessed by detailed comparison of karyotypes in the 6-thioguanine resistant segregants with those of the parental hybrid lines. The results clearly demonstrate that loss of an entire X chromosome is the primary event responsible for segregation at the HPRT locus, while deletion of a portion of the short arm of an X chromosome was also a frequent event. The results provide the first direct evidence for the assignment of the mapping of this locus to the distal region of the short arm. Analysis of chromosome number distributions in the hybrids and segregants suggests that in selecting chromosomal segregants one may also select for hybrid lines with reduced chromosome stability.     

MreB actin-mediated segregation of a specific region of a bacterial chromosome

Faithful chromosome segregation is an essential component of cell division in all organisms. The eukaryotic mitotic machinery uses the cytoskeleton to move specific chromosomal regions. To investigate the potential role of the actin-like MreB protein in bacterial chromosome segregation, we first demonstrate that MreB is the direct target of the small molecule A22. We then demonstrate that A22 completely blocks the movement of newly replicated loci near the origin of replication but has no qualitative or quantitative effect on the segregation of other loci if added after origin segregation. MreB selectively interacts, directly or indirectly, with origin-proximal regions of the chromosome, arguing that the origin-proximal region segregates via an MreB-dependent mechanism not used by the rest of the chromosome.     

Distorted segregation resulting from pea chromosome reconstructions with alien segments from Pisum fulvum

Pea (Pisum sativum L.) satellited chromosome reconstructions were analyzed by cytologic markers to identify segregation distortion events. The presence of modified chromosomes was evaluated on the basis of additional rDNA genes, an extra and a longer satellite, all derived from chromosome 5 and chromosome 7 from P. fulvum Sibth. & Sm. The segregation of modified satellited chromosome 5 was monitored through fluorescent in situ hybridization with rDNA probe; it fitted the expected 1:2:1 ratio after self-pollination of a heterozygous genotype for modified chromosome 5. In different genotypes, which were heterozygous for both modified chromosomes 5 and 7, the combined segregation of these chromosomes showed the occurrence of seven karyotype classes instead of the expected nine. The classes with modified chromosome 7 and without modified chromosome 5, whether heterozygous or homozygous, were absent. The hypothesis of gamete selection was rejected since the expected segregation ratio of 5:3:1 was significant by chi-square test. Based on the other hypothesis of postzygotic selection, the segregation ratio did not show a significant deviation from the expected 9:3:1 ratio, thereby indicating that embryo abortion caused the segregation distortion (SD). The hypothesis of the SD system involving two loci carried by the alien satellites of modified chromosomes 5 and 7 is discussed in relation to the evolution of the P. fulvum genome.     

Dynein promotes achiasmate segregation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Most organisms use crossovers (chiasmata) to maintain physical connections between homologous chromosomes that ensure their proper segregation at the first meiotic division. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has a residual ability to segregate homologous chromosomes in the absence of meiotic recombination (achiasmate segregation). Using cytologically tagged chromosomes, we established a role for the microtubule motor dynein in meiotic chromosome segregation. Dhc1, the motor subunit of dynein, is required for chromosome segregation in both the presence and the absence of recombination. Dlc1, a member of the Tctex-1 dynein light-chain family, preferentially affects the segregation of achiasmate chromosomes. Dlc1 is the first identified protein, outside of Drosophila, that preferentially affects achiasmate chromosome segregation. We discuss possible roles of the dynein motor in this process.     

Chromosome segregation and double-strand break repair - a complex connection

Genome stability requires correct chromosome segregation and DNA repair. Failure of these processes leads to cell death or accumulation of chromosomal aberrations, as often observed in tumor cells. An increasing number of observations indicate that segregation and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair are functionally connected by the Cohesin and Smc5/6 protein complexes. Through their interaction with the duplicated genome, these complexes play essential roles in both chromosome segregation and repair by sister chromatid recombination. Both are also recruited to DSBs, and their chromosomal association is similarly regulated. Interestingly, recent studies of Cohesin suggest that DSB formation could promote proper mitotic chromosome segregation. This is reminiscent of segregation in meiotic cells, which is facilitated by break-induced chromosomal tethering.     

The Cdc14 phosphatase and the FEAR network control meiotic spindle disassembly and chromosome segregation

During meiosis, DNA replication is followed by two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation. Cells lacking the protein phosphatase CDC14 or its regulators, SPO12 and SLK19, undergo only a single meiotic division, with some chromosomes segregating reductionally and others equationally. We find that this abnormal chromosome behavior is due to an uncoupling of meiotic events. Anaphase I spindle disassembly is delayed in cdc14-1, slk19Delta, or spo12Delta mutants, but the chromosome segregation cycle continues, so that both meiotic chromosome segregation phases take place on the persisting meiosis I spindle. Our results show that Cdc14, Slk19, and Spo12 are not only required for meiosis I spindle disassembly but also play a pivotal role in establishing two consecutive chromosome segregation phases, a key feature of the meiotic cell cycle.     

A large dispersed chromosomal region required for chromosome segregation in sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis

The cis-acting sequences required for chromosome segregation are poorly understood in most organisms, including bacteria. Sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis undergo an unusual asymmetric cell division during which the origin of DNA replication (oriC) region of the chromosome migrates to an extreme polar position. We have now characterized the sequences required for this migration. We show that the previously characterized soj-spo0J chromosome segregation system is not essential for chromosome movement to the cell pole, so this must be driven by an additional segregation mechanism. Observations on a large set of precisely engineered chromosomal inversions and translocations have identified a polar localization region (PLR), which lies approximately 150-300 kbp to the left of oriC. Surprisingly, oriC itself has no involvement in this chromosome segregation system. Dissection of the PLR showed that it has internal functional redundancy, reminiscent of the large diffuse centromeres of most eukaryotic cells.