The ribosome's response to codon-anticodon mismatches

The ribosome is a molecular machine that synthesizes polypeptides from aminoacyl-tRNAs according to the sequence of the mRNA template. Codon reading by the anticodon of tRNA is controlled by a network of ribosome contacts that are specific for each position of the codon-anticodon duplex and involve A-minor RNA interactions. Rapid and accurate tRNA selection is accomplished by switching the conformation of the decoding site between accepting and rejecting mode, regardless of the thermodynamic stability of the respective codon-anticodon complexes or their interactions at the decoding site. The forward reactions are particularly sensitive to mismatches and determine the variations in the extent of misreading of near-cognate codons, both during initial selection and proofreading. This review emphasizes the progress made in understanding the mechanisms that determine recognition and selection of tRNA by the translational machinery.     

Rationalization and prediction of selective decoding of pseudouridine-modified nonsense and sense codons

A stop or nonsense codon is an in-frame triplet within a messenger RNA that signals the termination of translation. One common feature shared among all three nonsense codons (UAA, UAG, and UGA) is a uridine present at the first codon position. It has been recently shown that the conversion of this uridine into pseudouridine (Ψ) suppresses translation termination, both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, decoding of the pseudouridylated nonsense codons is accompanied by the incorporation of two specific amino acids in a nonsense codon-dependent fashion. Ψ differs from uridine by a single N1H group at the C5 position; how Ψ suppresses termination and, more importantly, enables selective decoding is poorly understood. Here, we provide molecular rationales for how pseudouridylated stop codons are selectively decoded. Our analysis applies crystal structures of ribosomes in varying states of translation to consider weakened interaction of Ψ with release factor; thermodynamic and geometric considerations of the codon-anticodon base pairs to rank and to eliminate mRNA-tRNA pairs; the mechanism of fidelity check of the codon-anticodon pairing by the ribosome to evaluate noncanonical codon-anticodon base pairs and the role of water. We also consider certain tRNA modifications that interfere with the Ψ-coordinated water in the major groove of the codon-anticodon mini-helix. Our analysis of nonsense codons enables prediction of potential decoding properties for Ψ-modified sense codons, such as decoding ΨUU potentially as Cys and Tyr. Our results provide molecular rationale for the remarkable dynamics of ribosome decoding and insights on possible reprogramming of the genetic code using mRNA modifications.     

Selection of tRNA by the ribosome requires a transition from an open to a closed form

A structural and mechanistic explanation for the selection of tRNAs by the ribosome has been elusive. Here, we report crystal structures of the 30S ribosomal subunit with codon and near-cognate tRNA anticodon stem loops bound at the decoding center and compare affinities of equivalent complexes in solution. In ribosomal interactions with near-cognate tRNA, deviation from Watson-Crick geometry results in uncompensated desolvation of hydrogen-bonding partners at the codon-anticodon minor groove. As a result, the transition to a closed form of the 30S induced by cognate tRNA is unfavorable for near-cognate tRNA unless paromomycin induces part of the rearrangement. We conclude that stabilization of a closed 30S conformation is required for tRNA selection, and thereby structurally rationalize much previous data on translational fidelity.     

Codon reading by tRNAAla with modified uridine in the wobble position

tRNAs reading four-codon families often have a modified uridine, cmo(5)U(34), at the wobble position of the anticodon. Here, we examine the effects on the decoding mechanism of a cmo(5)U modification in tRNA(1B)(Ala), anticodon C(36)G(35)cmo(5)U(34). tRNA(1B)(Ala) reads its cognate codons in a manner that is very similar to that of tRNA(Phe). As Ala codons are GC rich and Phe codons AU rich, this similarity suggests a uniform decoding mechanism that is independent of the GC content of the codon-anticodon duplex or the identity of the tRNA. The presence of cmo(5)U at the wobble position of tRNA(1B)(Ala) permits fairly efficient reading of non-Watson-Crick and nonwobble bases in the third codon position, e.g., the GCC codon. The ribosome accepts the C-cmo(5)U pair as an almost-correct base pair, unlike third-position mismatches, which lead to the incorporation of incorrect amino acids and are efficiently rejected.     

Testing constraints on rRNA bases that make nonsequence-specific contacts with the codon-anticodon complex in the ribosomal A site

During protein synthesis, interactions between the decoding center of the ribosome and the codon-anticodon complexes maintain translation accuracy. Correct aminoacyl-tRNAs induce the ribosome to shift into a "closed" conformation that both blocks tRNA dissociation and accelerates the process of tRNA acceptance. As part of the ribosomal recognition of cognate tRNAs, the rRNA nucleotides G530 and A1492 form a hydrogen-bonded pair that interacts with the middle position of the codon.anticodon complex and recognizes correct Watson-Crick base pairs. Exchanging these two nucleotides (A530 and G1492) would not disrupt these interactions, suggesting that such a double mutant ribosome might properly recognize tRNAs and support viability. We find, however, that exchange mutants retain little ribosomal activity. We suggest that even though the exchanged nucleotides might function properly during tRNA recruitment, they might disrupt one or more other functions of the nucleotides during other stages of protein synthesis.     

Mutational analysis reveals two independent molecular requirements during transfer RNA selection on the ribosome

Accurate discrimination between cognate and near-cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs during translation relies on the specific acceleration of forward rate constants for cognate tRNAs. Such specific rate enhancement correlates with conformational changes in the tRNA and small ribosomal subunit that depend on an RNA-specific type of interaction, the A-minor motif, between universally conserved 16S ribosomal RNA nucleotides and the cognate codon-anticodon helix. We show that perturbations of these two components of the A-minor motif, the conserved rRNA bases and the codon-anticodon helix, result in distinct outcomes. Although both cause decreases in the rates of tRNA selection that are rescued by aminoglycoside antibiotics, only disruption of the codon-anticodon helix is overcome by a miscoding tRNA variant. On this basis, we propose that two independent molecular requirements must be met to allow tRNAs to proceed through the selection pathway, providing a mechanism for exquisite control of fidelity during this step in gene expression.     

Effect of modification of tRNA nucleotide 37 on the tRNA interaction with the A and P sites of the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome

The modified nucleotide 3′ of the tRNA anticodon is an important structural element that regulates the codon-anticodon interaction in the ribosome by stacking with codon-anticodon bases. The presence and identity (pyrimidine, purine, or modified purine) of this nucleotide significantly affects the energy of stacking in the A and P sites of the ribosome. Modification of nucleotide 37 does not contribute to stacking in the A site of the 70S ribosome, while its effect is substantial in the P site. The enthalpies of tRNA interactions with the A and P sites in the ribosome are similar and considerably lower than the enthalpy of the interactions of two tRNAs with the cognate anticodons in solution, suggesting that the ribosome contributes to the enthalpy-related portion of the free energy of tRNA binding by directly forming additional interactions with tRNA or by indirectly stabilizing the conformation of the codon-anticodon complex. In addition to stacking, tRNA binding in the A and P sites is further stabilized by interactions that involve magnesium ions. The number of ions involved in the formation of the tRNA-ribosome complex depends on the identity of tRNA nucleotide 37.     

Flipping of the Ribosomal A-Site Adenines Provides a Basis for tRNA Selection

Ribosomes control the missense error rate of ~ 10^− 4 during translation though quantitative contributions of individual mechanistic steps of the conformational changes yet to be fully determined. Biochemical and biophysical studies led to a qualitative tRNA selection model in which ribosomal A-site residues A1492 and A1493 (A1492/3) flip out in response to cognate tRNA binding, promoting the subsequent reactions, but not in the case of near-cognate or non-cognate tRNA. However, this model was recently questioned by X-ray structures revealing conformations of extrahelical A1492/3 and domain closure of the decoding center in both cognate and near-cognate tRNA bound ribosome complexes, suggesting that the non-specific flipping of A1492/3 has no active role in tRNA selection. We explore this question by carrying out molecular dynamics simulations, aided with fluorescence and NMR experiments, to probe the free energy cost of extrahelical flipping of 1492/3 and the strain energy associated with domain conformational change. Our rigorous calculations demonstrate that the A1492/3 flipping is indeed a specific response to the binding of cognate tRNA, contributing 3 kcal/mol to the specificity of tRNA selection. Furthermore, the different A-minor interactions in cognate and near-cognate complexes propagate into the conformational strain and contribute another 4 kcal/mol in domain closure. The recent structure of ribosome with features of extrahelical A1492/3 and closed domain in near-cognate complex is reconciled by possible tautomerization of the wobble base pair in mRNA–tRNA. These results quantitatively rationalize other independent experimental observations and explain the ribosomal discrimination mechanism of selecting cognate versus near-cognate tRNA.     

ms2i6A deficiency enhances proofreading in translation.

The hypermodified base 2-methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenosine (ms2i6A) at position 37 occurs frequently in tRNAs that read codons starting with uridine. Here we have studied how ms2i6A affects the accuracy of poly(U) translation in vitro. Deficiency leads to a higher rejection rate of tRNA4(Leu) by more aggressive proofreading on the wild-type ribosome, but with the initial selection step unchanged. Our data indicate that ms2i6A has no effect on codon-anticodon interactions on wild-type ribosomes as long as aminoacyl-tRNA is in ternary complex with EF-Tu and GTP. ms2i6A deficiency in the cognate poly(U) reader tRNA(Phe) leads to increased misreading when the near-cognate competitor tRNA4(Leu) is wild-type. ms2i6A deficiency in tRNA4(Leu) gives a decreased error level in competition with wild-type tRNA(Phe).     

A twisted tRNA intermediate sets the threshold for decoding

Putting together consistent cryo-EM structure, transient kinetic and mutant tRNA suppressor data, it appears that a deformed or waggling aminoacyl-tRNA is the critical transitional structure examined by the ribosome during decoding at the A site. The unusual conformation may be required for effective proofreading of the codon-anticodon complex.     

Insights into the decoding mechanism from recent ribosome structures

During the decoding process, tRNA selection by the ribosome is far more accurate than expected from codon-anticodon pairing. Antibiotics such as streptomycin and paromomycin have long been known to increase the error rate of translation, and many mutations that increase or lower accuracy have been characterized. Recent crystal structures show that the specific recognition of base-pairing geometry leads to a closure of the domains of the small subunit around cognate tRNA. This domain closure is likely to trigger subsequent steps in tRNA selection. Many antibiotics and mutations act by making the domain closure more or less favourable. In conjunction with recent cryoelectron microscopy structures of the ribosome, a comprehensive structural understanding of the decoding process is beginning to emerge.     

Energetics of codon-anticodon recognition on the small ribosomal subunit

Recent crystal structures of the small ribosomal subunit have made it possible to examine the detailed energetics of codon recognition on the ribosome by computational methods. The binding of cognate and near-cognate anticodon stem loops to the ribosome decoding center, with mRNA containing the Phe UUU and UUC codons, are analyzed here using explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations together with the linear interaction energy (LIE) method. The calculated binding free energies are in excellent agreement with experimental binding constants and reproduce the relative effects of mismatches in the first and second codon position versus a mismatch at the wobble position. The simulations further predict that the Leu2 anticodon stem loop is about 10 times more stable than the Ser stem loop in complex with the Phe UUU codon. It is also found that the ribosome significantly enhances the intrinsic stability differences of codon-anticodon complexes in aqueous solution. Structural analysis of the simulations confirms the previously suggested importance of the universally conserved nucleotides A1492, A1493, and G530 in the decoding process.     

The second to last amino acid in the nascent peptide as a codon context determinant.

Forty-two different sense codons, coding for all 20 amino acids, were placed at the ribosomal E site location, two codons upstream of a UGA or UAG codon. The influence of these variable codons on readthrough of the stop codons was measured in Escherichia coli. A 30-fold difference in readthrough of the UGA codon was observed. Readthrough is not related to any property of the upstream codon, its cognate tRNA or the nature of its codon-anticodon interaction. Instead, it is the amino acid corresponding to the second upstream codon, in particular the acidic/basic property of this amino acid, which seems to be a major determinant. This amino acid effect is influenced by the identity of the A site stop codon and the efficiency of its decoding tRNA, which suggests a correlation with ribosomal pausing. The magnitude of the amino acid effect is in some cases different when UGA is decoded by a wildtype form of tRNA(Trp) as compared with a suppressor form of the same tRNA. This indicates that the structure of the A site decoding tRNA is also a determinant for the amino acid effect.     

Kinetic basis for global loss of fidelity arising from mismatches in the P-site codon:anticodon helix

Faithful decoding of the genetic information by the ribosome relies on kinetically driven mechanisms that promote selection of cognate substrates during elongation. Recently, we have shown that in addition to these kinetically driven mechanisms, the ribosome possesses a post peptidyl transfer quality control system that retrospectively monitors the codon–anticodon interaction in the P site, triggering substantial losses in the specificity of the A site during subsequent tRNA and RF selection when a mistake has occurred. Here, we report a detailed kinetic analysis of tRNA selection in the context of a mismatched P-site codon:anticodon interaction. We observe pleiotropic effects of a P-site mismatch on tRNA selection, such that near-cognate tRNA is processed by the ribosome almost as efficiently as cognate. In particular, after a miscoding event, near-cognate codon–anticodon complexes are stabilized on the ribosome to an extent similar to that observed for cognate ones. Moreover, the two observed forward rates of GTPase activation and accommodation are greatly accelerated (∼10-fold) for near-cognate tRNAs. Because the ensemble of effects of a mismatched P site on substrate selection were found to be different from those reported for other ribosomal perturbations and miscoding agents, we propose that the structural integrity of the mRNA–tRNA helix in the P site provides a distinct molecular switch that dictates the specificity of the A site.     

The role of modifications in codon discrimination by tRNA(Lys)UUU

The natural modification of specific nucleosides in many tRNAs is essential during decoding of mRNA by the ribosome. For example, tRNA(Lys)(UUU) requires the modification N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine at position 37 (t(6)A37), adjacent and 3' to the anticodon, to bind AAA in the A site of the ribosomal 30S subunit. Moreover, it can only bind both AAA and AAG lysine codons when doubly modified with t(6)A37 and either 5-methylaminomethyluridine or 2-thiouridine at the wobble position (mnm(5)U34 or s(2)U34). Here we report crystal structures of modified tRNA anticodon stem-loops bound to the 30S ribosomal subunit with lysine codons in the A site. These structures allow the rationalization of how modifications in the anticodon loop enable decoding of both lysine codons AAA and AAG.     

Biochemical characterization of the ribosomal decoding site

Prior to the emergence of crystal structures of the ribosome, different ribosomal functions were identified with specific regions of ribosomal RNA by biochemical and genetic approaches. In particular, three universally conserved bases of 16S rRNA, G530, A1492 and A1493, were implicated in the interaction of the incoming aminoacyl-tRNA with the 30S subunit and mRNA. The conserved region surrounding A1492 and A1493 was called the "decoding site", based on the results of chemical probing experiments and antibiotic resistance mutations. Crystallographic studies from the Ramakrishnan laboratory have now shown that G530 loop, A1492 and A1493 undergo localized conformational changes to form an RNA structure that positions these three bases to inspect the accuracy of the codon-anticodon match with high stereochemical precision, using A-minor interactions. Some results from the pre-X-ray era may provide clues to further aspects of the decoding process.     

Maintenance of the correct open reading frame by the ribosome

During translation, a string of non-overlapping triplet codons in messenger RNA is decoded into protein. The ability of a ribosome to decode mRNA without shifting between reading frames is a strict requirement for accurate protein biosynthesis. Despite enormous progress in understanding the mechanism of transfer RNA selection, the mechanism by which the correct reading frame is maintained remains unclear. In this report, evidence is presented that supports the idea that the translational frame is controlled mainly by the stability of codon–anticodon interactions at the P site. The relative instability of such interactions may lead to dissociation of the P-site tRNA from its codon, and formation of a complex with an overlapping codon, the process known as P-site tRNA slippage. We propose that this process is central to all known cases of +1 ribosomal frameshifting, including that required for the decoding of the yeast transposable element Ty3. An earlier model for the decoding of this element proposed 'out-of-frame' binding of A-site tRNA without preceding P-site tRNA slippage.     

How are tRNAs and mRNA arranged in the ribosome? An attempt to correlate the stereochemistry of the tRNA-mRNA interaction with constraints imposed by the ribosomal topography.

Two tRNA molecules at the ribosomal A- and P-sites, with a relatively small angle between the planes of the L-shaped molecules, can be arranged in two mutually exclusive orientations. In one (the 'R'-configuration), the T-loop of the A-site tRNA faces the D-loop of the P-site tRNA, whereas in the other (the 'S'-configuration) the D-loop of the A-site tRNA faces the T-loop of the P-site tRNA. A number of stereochemical arguments, based on the crystal structure of 'free' tRNA, favour the R-configuration. In the ribosome, the CCA-ends of the tRNA molecules are 'fixed' at the base of the central protuberance (the peptidyl transferase centre) of the 50S subunit, and the anticodon loops lie in the neck region (the decoding site) of the 30S subunit. The translocation step is essentially a rotational movement of the tRNA from the A- to the P-site, and there is convincing evidence that the A-site must be located nearest to the L7/L12 protuberance of the 50S subunit. The mRNA in the two codon-anticodon duplexes lies on the 'inside' of the 'elbows' of the tRNA molecules (in both the S-type and R-type configurations), and runs up between the two molecules from the A- to the P-site in the 3' to 5'-direction. These considerations have the consequence that in the S-configuration the mRNA in the codon-anticodon duplexes is directed towards the 50S subunit, whereas in the R-configuration it is directed towards the 30S subunit. The results of site-directed cross-linking experiments, in particular cross-links to mRNA at positions within or very close to the codons interacting with A- or P-site tRNA, favour the latter situation. This conclusion is in direct contradiction to other current models for the arrangement of mRNA and tRNA on the ribosome.