Educational values and services of ecosystems and landscapes – An overview

Education is one of the multiple services that ecosystems and landscapes provide to societies. Despite its importance to formal and informal learning and nature-based, cognitive tourism, it is hardly taken into account in the various quantification approaches of ecosystem services. The article provides an overview of landscape educational values and the educational ecosystem service. Here, the forms of the use of landscape educational values have been summarised and the indicators for the quantification of the educational ecosystem service proposed in the literature reviewed. The criteria for the evaluation of the educational values of landscape were acquired from the literature and discussed. In order to obtain more practical viewpoints on those criteria, an exploratory survey with young experts (n = 37) from two universities of environmental sciences was conducted. Within this step, the expert method for the evaluation of the educational values of landscapes was applied. However, the results show an extremely high level of subjectivity and dependence on personal experience regarding outdoor environmental education. Nonetheless, the article can contribute to acquiring knowledge in cultural ecosystem service assessment and the application of this concept, especially in terms of the criteria and indicators which can be potentially used for the assessments.     

Landscape assessment for sustainable planning

The 1st International Conference on Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes (IALUC) was held from the 6th to 9th of April 2008 at Humboldt University in Berlin, Germany. At the meeting, 160 oral presentations (including five plenary speeches) and 69 posters by representatives from 39 countries were presented. Papers and posters in four general sessions (Tools and Models, Policies and Scenarios, Scale and Indicators, and Participation and Socio-Economy) considered various aspects of the impact assessment of land use and landscape changes. This special section of the journal Ecological Indicators consists of nine selected presentations from different sub-sessions of the IALUC conference considering the use of indicators in landscape assessment.     

Landscape structure and management regime as indicators of calcareous grassland habitat condition and species diversity

This study investigates the importance of spatial landscape characteristics and habitat management on the condition of calcareous grassland in the North Down Natural Area, Kent UK. We used a digitised map of the study area containing shapefiles of all the habitats including 82 patches of calcareous grassland together with management information for each patch and data on the presence and abundance of a range of calcareous grassland indicator plant species. We defined habitat condition by presence of indicator species and used classification trees to generate models with rules for predicting habitat condition from the landscape spatial characteristics and management information. We also applied the same method to investigate the factors affecting presence or diversity of three ecological groups of positive indicator species and dominance of a negative indicator species. All the models except one showed good classification accuracy and high kappa statistic. Favourable habitat condition was predicted by presence of different types of grazing management, presence of woodland around patches of calcareous grassland and shape complexity. These results indicate that calcareous grassland in favourable condition is management-dependent but also located in less intensively managed landscapes. Unfavourable habitat condition was predicted by threat factors such as lack of management and high incidence of arable or improved grassland around patches of calcareous grassland, indicating nutrient enrichment and habitat degradation. Some of these factors also predicted high diversity of the different ecological species groups. The value of this method for predicting habitat condition and species diversity from baseline ecological data for conservation monitoring at the landscape level is emphasised.     

Biodeterioration of Mayan archaeological sites in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico

Many of the monuments of the Mayan civilization are suffering deterioration caused by environmental factors (high temperatures and relative humidities), increasing contamination from natural and anthropogenic sources, and by the action of micro- and macro-biological communities. Archaeological sites and historical monuments in the Mayan area were constructed with different limestones which offer different resistances to degradation by the various types of contamination. Two different sampling sites were chosen at the archaeological site of Uxmal in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Heterotrophic bacteria, cyanobacteria and different fungi were isolated and classified taxonomically. The other archaeological site chosen for this study was the fortress of Tulum, located at the side of the Caribbean Sea and exposed to chloride of marine spray and sand erosion. In this case, heterotrophic aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, cyanobacteria and fungi were isolated from the four sampling areas selected. In both archaeological sites crust deposits were observed by using light microscopy, SEM and ESEM. Surface analyses were made by means of EDAX and electron microprobe. Possible mechanisms of stone decay, based on the type of microorganisms isolated, the physico-chemical characteristics of the constructional materials and environmental factors are discussed.     

Castle Pišece,Slovenia – Building history and wood economy revealed by dendrochronology,dendroprovenancing and historical sources

Castle Pišece, located in SE Slovenia near the border with Croatia, is thought to have been built in the 12th/13th century as one in the line of Salzburg fortresses on the then SE border of the Holy Roman Empire. During thorough restoration that started in 2005, its wooden constructions became accessible for dendrochronological investigations. We collected representative samples from floor or ceiling constructions in most of the rooms in the castle. Dendrochronology helped us to identify felling dates of wood and to propose probable years of reconstructions in 1515, 1578, 1644, 1697, 1752, 1758, 1775 and 1878. The dating showed that the constructions in the presumed Romanesque and Renaissance parts of the building were not as old as expected, whereas those in the supposedly Baroque part of the castle were older than assumed. The selection of wood species used for constructions varied over time. Constructions with end dates 1515–1697 were made of oak (Quercus petraea and Q. robur), those dated to 1752 of silver fir (Abies alba), those dated to 1758 of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) and those dated to 1878 of common beech (Fagus sylvatica). Comparison of forestry archives and vegetation in the area showed that most of the timber could have originated from nearby forests; only silver fir had to be transported from sites that were at least 20 km away from the castle. Cross-dating of tree-ring series of oak elements with two reference chronologies from Slovenia and two from Austria confirmed the great likelihood that the wood used mostly originated from Slovenia. This indicates that dendroprovenancing, not used in the area before, could also be used SE of the Alps. Both the existing archival documents and dendrochronology indicate that woodworks have taken place every few decades in some periods. The dendrochronological dates can be partly linked to reports on earthquakes (especially the devastating one in 1511), rebellions and year marks carved on the stone plaques.     

五台山文化景观遗产突出普遍价值及其保护探讨

世界文化景观遗产的申报,是近年来国内越来越关注的话题,作为中国第一个成功以文化景观列入世界遗产名录的案例,五台山的申报过程为中国的文化景观遗产申报与研究提供了很多线索,尤其在突出普遍价值的认识及其保护管理方面,更是积累了一定的经验,同时也引发了新的思考。经过申报前后对遗产价值标准的对比研究及对保护管理的重新思考,认识到文化景观必须将自然、文化作为一个整体加以认知和保护,尤其要研究人与自然之间的作用机制,重视其中活态遗产的保护和展示。     

Human time in tree rings

‘Human time’ means time in the context of human culture and activities. It is shown how ‘human time’ is biologically archived in and dendrochronologically extracted from tree rings. For illustration, examples in the late medieval Hanseatic city of Lübeck are selected.     

Correlations between forest stand diversity and landscape pattern in Otepää Nature Park, Estonia

Rank correlations between tree species diversity in forest stands and parameters of landscape pattern were calculated using data from 4933 locations in Otepää Nature Park. Stand diversity was characterised by the number of tree species in the stand formula and by the index of dominance of tree species’ coverage. Landscape diversity was characterised by locally calculated pattern parameters from three categorical map layers (1:10 000 base map, 1:10 000 soil map, combination of these maps) and from six numerical variables (elevation, slope angle, four channels of a Landsat 7 ETM image).A weak trend appeared for more diverse forest stands to be located in more diverse landscapes according to the base map. Forest stand diversity is also higher on steeper slopes and in places surrounded by slopes of varying steepness. The correlation between landscape diversity and biodiversity depends on the radius of the kernel in which landscape characteristics are calculated. Evidence of an indicative neighbourhood could be seen in many spatial relationships. The spatial correlation between stand diversity and indices calculated from the base map was most visible at distances ranging from 400 to 500 m; surface elevation and its variation correlates with stand diversity at distances of 100–200 m. Some relationships between forest diversity and landscape diversity that had a different sign of correlation in proximate and distant kernels can be interpreted as a need to standardise local landscape indices with the index values in a wider neighbourhood as a reference.     

Indicating ecosystem and landscape organisation

This paper presents a brief outline of the theoretical and conceptual fundamentals for the derivation of an ecosystem oriented indicator system to demonstrate the state of ecological entities on a holistic basis. There are two branches of argumentation: on a normative level, the sustainability principle is interpreted from an anthropocentric point-of-view; sustainability in this context means to provide ecosystem services on a broad scale and a long-term basis, including the attempt to avoid unspecific ecological risks. A second line-of-argumentation bases on the principles of ecosystem analysis and the theory of ecological orientation. Consequently, the aspired indicandum is the self-organising capacity of ecosystems, and the indicator sets represents an aggregate of structural and functional ecosystem features in a developing environment. The indicator set is demonstrated by one case study from the Bornhoeved Lakes ecosystem research project.     

Quantitative floral phenology at the landscape scale: Is a comparative spatio-temporal description of ‘‘flowering landscapes’’ possible?

Entomophilous flowers form the food resources for insect pollinators. Many pollinator species forage at the landscape scale and depend on floral resources that are highly variable in space and time. We present a general model approach in which the floral resources of plant communities are estimated by the floral phenology and the cover of entomophilous plant species. We applied this landscape model in a case study for three landscape sections (1.5–2.2 km²) with strongly differing land-use patterns. The comparison between a conservation area and two agricultural landscapes shows extreme differences in the quantities and in the course of floral resources.

In a stepwise simplification of the landscape model we tested the effects of input data with lower spatio-temporal resolution. Even if input data for floral phenology and vegetation have a low resolution, the landscape model allows a ranking of landscape-specific floral resource potentials. The results of the case study encourage the use of landscape models to estimate floral resource potentials. The assessment of floral resource potentials may help to define this essential landscape quality for evaluation in practical nature conservation.     

对中国动物地理学研究的几点思考

鉴于当今中国动物地理学研究中存在的问题,作者就以下三个方面,提出自己的见解:1 在动物地理区划研究中,加强地理迭合探讨,有助于解决我国境内古北-东洋分界线的争议和关于建立“西藏界”的建议;2 在栖息地研究中应加强综合观点,景观动物生态地理学方向值得提倡;3 文化生物地理学研究中,应注意我国具有十分悠久农业文化历史的影响。     

景观生态分类的理论方法

重点讨论了景观生态分类的基本原理,认为景观生态分类宜采用结构性与功能性双系列体系,提出景观生态系统的基本功能类型,即生物生产、环境服务及文化支持3种.试图对正在发展的景观生态学尤其是景观生态分类的理论和应用产生一些积极影响.     

Depression screening as a quality indicator

Objective Although practice guidelines for depression screening are evidence based, with their development relying on reviews of controlled studies, their adaptation and use as quality indicators have not been subject to rigorous study. This paper will therefore review the evidence supporting this practice.Methods A rational evaluation was carried out on both controlled studies and other sources of evidence related to the technical, clinical and policy assumptions underlying the use of depression screening guidelines as quality indicators.Results 1) Technical assumptions: depression screening could be used as a quality indicator. Current information technology does not allow accurate determination of who would benefit from being screened, whether they actually were screened, or the optimal percentage that should be screened. 2) Clinical assumptions: depression screening would improve outcomes. The evidence suggests that although depression screening might increase the diagnosis of depression, depressed patients so recognised tend to be less ill, less in need of treatment, or less likely to benefit from treatment, while screening, in the absence of other interventions, does not improve outcomes. 3) Policy assumptions: depression screening should be a focus of quality improvement. However, relative to other preventative measures, depression screening is a low priority. It does not meet usual cost-effectiveness criteria. There are more robust interventions for depression (i.e. collaborative care) that could be a focus of quality improvement efforts.Conclusion Although routine depression screening may be an acceptable practice guideline, its use as a quality measure is not supported.