靶向RNA的CRISPR-Cas系统研究进展

CRISPR(clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas(CRISPR associated proteins)系统是细菌和古细菌抵抗噬菌体、质粒等外源遗传物质的一种适应性免疫系统,该系统利用一种特殊的RNA(CRISPR RNA,crRNA)指导的内切酶来切割与crRNA相互补的外源遗传物质,从而阻碍外源核酸的侵染。根据效应复合物组成形式的不同,CRISPR-Cas系统分为1类(Ⅰ型、Ⅳ型和Ⅲ型)和2类(Ⅱ型、Ⅴ型和Ⅵ型)两大类。目前已发现多个CRISPR-Cas系统具有非常强的特异靶向RNA编辑能力,如Ⅵ型CRISPR-Cas13系统和Ⅲ型CRISPR-Cas7-11系统。随着研究的深入,相关系统在RNA编辑领域应用日渐广泛,使其成为基因编辑的有力工具。本文介绍了靶向RNA的CRISPR-Cas系统的组成、结构、分子机制以及其潜在应用,这为更好地研究该类系统的作用机制奠定基础,也为后期开发为稳定的基因编辑工具提供新的思路。     

CRISPR-Cas系统转录调控机制的研究进展

原核生物可利用由CRISPR-Cas系统(clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR associated)介导的适应性免疫机制防御外源核酸入侵.在适应性免疫过程中,原核生物将外源核酸部分片段整合至自身CRISPR阵列中,表达并加工的...     

Microbial production of chemicals driven by CRISPR-Cas systems

1. Download : Download high-res image (104KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Characterization of CRISPR-Cas systems in the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) are composed of an array of short DNA repeat sequences separated by unique spacer sequences that are flanked by associated (Cas) genes. CRISPR-Cas systems are found in the genomes of several microbes and can act as an adaptive immune mechanism against invading foreign nucleic acids, such as phage genomes. Here, we studied the CRISPR-Cas systems in plant-pathogenic bacteria of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (RSSC). A CRISPR-Cas system was found in 31% of RSSC genomes present in public databases. Specifically, CRISPR-Cas types I-E and II-C were found, with I-E being the most common. The presence of the same CRISPR-Cas types in distinct Ralstonia phylotypes and species suggests the acquisition of the system by a common ancestor before Ralstonia species segregation. In addition, a Cas1 phylogeny (I-E type) showed a perfect geographical segregation of phylotypes, supporting an ancient acquisition. Ralstoniasolanacearum strains CFBP2957 and K60^T were challenged with a virulent phage, and the CRISPR arrays of bacteriophage-insensitive mutants (BIMs) were analysed. No new spacer acquisition was detected in the analysed BIMs. The functionality of the CRISPR-Cas interference step was also tested in R. solanacearum CFBP2957 using a spacer-protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) delivery system, and no resistance was observed against phage phiAP1. Our results show that the CRISPR-Cas system in R. solanacearum CFBP2957 is not its primary antiviral strategy.     

Diverse virus-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems include streamlined genome editors

1. Download : Download high-res image (285KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems

Bacteria have adaptive immunity against viruses (phages) in the form of CRISPR-Cas immune systems. Currently, 6 types of CRISPR-Cas systems are known and the molecular study of three of these has revealed important molecular differences. It is unknown if and how these molecular differences change the outcome of phage infection and the evolutionary pressure the CRISPR-Cas systems faces. To determine the importance of these molecular differences, we model a phage outbreak entering a population defending exclusively with a type I/II or a type III CRISPR-Cas system. We show that for type III CRISPR-Cas systems, rapid phage extinction is driven by the probability to acquire at least one resistance spacer. However, for type I/II CRISPR-Cas systems, rapid phage extinction is characterized by an a threshold-like behaviour: any acquisition probability below this threshold leads to phage survival whereas any acquisition probability above it, results in phage extinction. We also show that in the absence of autoimmunity, high acquisition rates evolve. However, when CRISPR-Cas systems are prone to autoimmunity, intermediate levels of acquisition are optimal during a phage outbreak. As we predict an optimal probability of spacer acquisition 2 factors of magnitude above the one that has been measured, we discuss the origin of such a discrepancy. Finally, we show that in a biologically relevant parameter range, a type III CRISPR-Cas system can outcompete a type I/II CRISPR-Cas system with a slightly higher probability of acquisition.     

Evolution and the classification of social behavior

Recent studies in the evolution of cooperation have shifted focus from altruistic to mutualistic cooperation. This change in focus is purported to reveal new explanations for the evolution of prosocial behavior. We argue that the common classification scheme for social behavior used to distinguish between altruistic and mutualistic cooperation is flawed because it fails to take into account dynamically relevant game-theoretic features. This leads some arguments about the evolution of cooperation to conflate dynamical scenarios that differ regarding the basic conditions on the emergence and maintenance of cooperation. We use the tools of evolutionary game theory to increase the resolution of the classification scheme and analyze what evolutionary inferences classifying social behavior can license.     

Genomic diversity and CRISPR-Cas systems in the cyanobacterium Nostoc in the High Arctic

Nostoc (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria) has a global distribution in the Polar Regions. However, the genomic diversity of Nostoc is little known and there are no genomes available for polar Nostoc. Here we carried out the first genomic analysis of the Nostoc commune morphotype with a recent sample from the High Arctic and a herbarium specimen collected during the British Arctic Expedition (1875–76). Comparisons of the polar genomes with 26 present-day non-polar members of the Nostocales family highlighted that there are pronounced genetic variations among Nostoc strains and species. Osmoprotection and other stress genes were found in all Nostoc strains, but the two Arctic strains had markedly higher numbers of biosynthetic gene clusters for uncharacterised non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, suggesting a high diversity of secondary metabolites. Since viral–host interactions contribute to microbial diversity, we analysed the CRISPR-Cas systems in the Arctic and two temperate Nostoc species. There were a large number of unique repeat-spacer arrays in each genome, indicating diverse histories of viral attack. All Nostoc strains had a subtype I-D system, but the polar specimens also showed evidence of a subtype I-B system that has not been previously reported in cyanobacteria, suggesting diverse cyanobacteria–virus interactions in the Arctic.     

Structural basis of CRISPR-Cas Type III prokaryotic defence systems

1. Download : Download high-res image (155KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Harnessing Type I and Type III CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing

CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated) systems are widespread in archaea and bacteria, and research on their molecular mechanisms has led to the development of genome-editing techniques based on a few Type II systems. However, there has not been any report on harnessing a Type I or Type III system for genome editing. Here, a method was developed to repurpose both CRISPR-Cas systems for genetic manipulation in Sulfolobus islandicus, a thermophilic archaeon. A novel type of genome-editing plasmid (pGE) was constructed, carrying an artificial mini-CRISPR array and a donor DNA containing a non-target sequence. Transformation of a pGE plasmid would yield two alternative fates to transformed cells: wild-type cells are to be targeted for chromosomal DNA degradation, leading to cell death, whereas those carrying the mutant gene would survive the cell killing and selectively retained as transformants. Using this strategy, different types of mutation were generated, including deletion, insertion and point mutations. We envision this method is readily applicable to different bacteria and archaea that carry an active CRISPR-Cas system of DNA interference provided the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) of an uncharacterized PAM-dependent CRISPR-Cas system can be predicted by bioinformatic analysis.     

CRISPR-Cas systems are widespread accessory elements across bacterial and archaeal plasmids

Many prokaryotes encode CRISPR-Cas systems as immune protection against mobile genetic elements (MGEs), yet a number of MGEs also harbor CRISPR-Cas components. With a few exceptions, CRISPR-Cas loci encoded on MGEs are uncharted and a comprehensive analysis of their distribution, prevalence, diversity, and function is lacking. Here, we systematically investigated CRISPR-Cas loci across the largest curated collection of natural bacterial and archaeal plasmids. CRISPR-Cas loci are widely but heterogeneously distributed across plasmids and, in comparison to host chromosomes, their mean prevalence per Mbp is higher and their distribution is distinct. Furthermore, the spacer content of plasmid CRISPRs exhibits a strong targeting bias towards other plasmids, while chromosomal arrays are enriched with virus-targeting spacers. These contrasting targeting preferences highlight the genetic independence of plasmids and suggest a major role for mediating plasmid-plasmid conflicts. Altogether, CRISPR-Cas are frequent accessory components of many plasmids, which is an overlooked phenomenon that possibly facilitates their dissemination across microbiomes.     

Harnessing the type I CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing in prokaryotes

Genetic analysis is crucial to the understanding, exploitation, and control of microorganisms. The advent of CRISPR-Cas-based genome-editing techniques, particularly those mediated by the single-effector (Cas9 and Cas12a) class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, has revolutionized the genetics in model eukaryotic organisms. However, their applications in prokaryotes are rather limited, largely owing to the exceptional diversity of DNA homeostasis in microorganisms and severe cytotoxicity of overexpressing these nuclease proteins in certain genotypes. Remarkably, CRISPR-Cas systems belonging to different classes and types are continuously identified in prokaryotic genomes and serve as a deep reservoir for expansion of the CRISPR-based genetic toolkits. ~90% of the CRISPR-Cas systems identified so far belong to the class 1 system which hinges on multi-protein effector complexes for DNA interference. Harnessing these widespread native CRISPR-Cas systems for ‘built-in’ genome editing represents an emerging and powerful genetic tool in prokaryotes, especially in the genetically recalcitrant non-model species and strains. In this progress review, we introduce the general workflow of this emerging editing platform and summarize its establishment in a growing number of prokaryotes by harnessing the most widespread, diverse type I CRISPR-Cas systems present in their genomes. We also discuss the various factors affecting the success and efficiency of this editing platform and the corresponding solutions.