Comparison between two methods in the determination of circulating chromogranin A in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): results of a prospective multicenter observational study

Several methods for analyzing CgA using either monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies have been developed, which differ in their diagnostic performance. The present paper describes the results of a prospective multicenter study aimed at comparing the clinical value of the two most widely used commercially available CgA assay kits in patients affected by neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Two hundred sixty-one patients from 40 different centers and 99 healthy subjects were evaluated. CgA levels were measured with two different methods, a two-step immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CgA was measured centrally by two reference laboratories, one of which used IRMA and the other ELISA, and it was measured by the participating institutions with the method routinely used by each of them. The major findings of the present study were: (i) the two assays for the determination of CgA present good diagnostic performance; (ii) both assays are robust and guarantee comparable results when applied in different settings (central vs local laboratory); (iii) the negative/positive cutoff points (87 ng/mL for IRMA and 21.3 U/L for ELISA) were established according to standardized criteria; (iv) the results obtained with the two assays in basal clinical samples of patients affected by NETs show an apparently satisfactory correlation (rs = 0.843, p < 0.0001). However, a possibly clinically meaningful 36% discordance rate was found. These findings support the hypothesis that the two CgA kits might provide partially different information.     

Comparison of four different assays for determination of serum S-100B

BACKGROUND: S-100B determination has been shown to be clinically useful in the management of melanoma patients. After the development of a test for determination of the isoforms S100-A1B and S100-BB in serum (S-100B), several sensitive assays for the detection of serum S-100B have become available. We compared four S-100B assays, two automated (LIAISON Sangtec 100 and Elecsys S100) and two manual ones (Sangtec 100 ELISA and CanAg S100 EIA), with respect to clinical data, reference values and correlation. METHODS: In a total of 280 samples from 155 melanoma patients and 98 healthy individuals S-100B values were measured simultaneously with the different assays. RESULTS: The inter and intra coefficients of variation were best for the automated assays. The functional sensitivity of both manual assays was 0.15 microg/L. Method comparison revealed satisfactory correlation coefficients of 0.9 or higher, but the slopes ranged from 0.29 to 3.36. Except for the Sangtec 100 ELISA, the linearity between the assays was acceptable. The overall sensitivity for melanoma ranged from 37% (Elecsys S100) to 47% (LIAISON Sangtec 100) and the sensitivity increased with stage. ROC curves showed the best accuracy for the LIAISON Sangtec 100 assay. CONCLUSIONS: All assays gave satisfactory results, but it is advisable to improve the performance of the manual assays for better sensitivity. Agreement about an international reference standard is needed.     

Serum DSG2 as a potential biomarker for diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

Background: Exploration of serum biomarkers for early detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer is required. Here, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of serum desmoglein-2 (DSG2) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EJA).Methods: Serum DSG2 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 459 participants including 151 patients with ESCC, 96 with EJA, and 212 healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.Results: Levels of serum DSG2 were significantly higher in patients with ESCC and EJA than those in healthy controls (P<0.001). Detection of serum DSG2 demonstrated an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.724, sensitivity of 38.1%, and specificity of 84.8% for the diagnosis of ESCC in the training cohort, and AUC 0.736, sensitivity 58.2%, and specificity 84.7% in the validation cohort. For diagnosis of EJA, measurement of DSG2 provided a sensitivity of 29.2%, a specificity of 90.2%, and AUC of 0.698. Similar results were observed for the diagnosis of early-stage ESCC (AUC 0.715 and 0.722, sensitivity 36.3 and 50%, and specificity 84.8 and 84.7%, for training and validation cohorts, respectively) and early-stage EJA (AUC 0.704, sensitivity 44.4%, and specificity 86.9%). Analysis of clinical data indicated that DSG2 levels were significantly associated with patient age and histological grade in ESCC (P<0.05).Conclusion: Serum DSG2 may be a diagnostic biomarker for ESCC and EJA.     

Clinical usefulness of urine-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibody to Helicobacter pylori: a collaborative study in nine medical institutions in Japan

Background. A urine-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for detection of antibody to Helicobacter pylori has been developed in Japan. Urine samples can be obtained noninvasively and are easier and safer to handle than are serum samples. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical usefulness of this urine-based ELISA kit.
Materials and Methods. A pair of random, single-void urine and serum samples was collected from each of 1,061 subjects, including 238 patients with gastroduodenal disease. The sensitivity and specificity of the urine-based ELISA was compared with those of three commercially available serum-based ELISA kits. For those patients with gastroduodenal disease, the urine- and serum-based ELISA results were also compared with those for other diagnostic methods using endoscopic biopsy specimens, such as culture, histology, and rapid urease tests.
Results. Based on the three serum-based ELISA results, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the urine-based ELISA were 97.7%, 95.6%, and 96.8%, respectively. On the basis of the biopsy test results, the sensitivity (96.2%), specificity (78.9%), and accuracy (91.0%) of the urine-based ELISA were almost equivalent or superior to all three serum-based ELISAs tested. In addition, 10 of the 12 false-positive cases for urine-based ELISA were confirmed to be true positives for antibodies to H. pylori by Western blot analysis and inhibition ELISA.
Conclusions. The urine-based ELISA (URINELISA H. pylori Antibody) is very accurate and should be useful as an alternative to serum-based ELISAs for screening of H. pylori infection.     

An Italian program of external quality control for chromogranin A (CgA) assay: state of the art of CgA measurement

Chromogranin A (CgA) is a secretory protein produced by many neuroendocrine cells. Circulating levels of CgA have been found to be elevated in a variety of neuroendocrine tumors and may facilitate the diagnosis and management of patients with functioning as well as non-functioning forms. However, up to now the analytical methods used for assaying intact CgA and CgA-derived peptides in the circulation of patients have not been monitored in Italy by an external quality control program. Within the framework of a Ministry of Health project an external quality control program was developed to investigate the state of the art of CgA determination in Italy and to monitor the performance of laboratories carrying out this assay. This paper deals primarily with the former of these aspects. Every laboratory received the study protocol together with a questionnaire to be returned before receipt of the samples to be assayed. Serum and plasma samples obtained from a pool of routine specimens were prepared at three different concentrations of CgA, aliquoted, frozen at -80 degrees C and mailed in dry ice to the participating laboratories. Of the 43 laboratories, 21 used IRMA, 21 used ELISA and one used RIA. There was a wide range in the time of kit utilization and the number of samples assayed per year, which indicated that the participating group was heterogeneous with regard to their experience in the determination of CgA. Most laboratories routinely used serum and plasma for IRMA and ELISA, respectively, and different data fitting approaches were employed. Further analyses will investigate the possible influence of these preanalytical factors on laboratory performance.     

Multiple-bead assay for the differential serodiagnosis of neglected human cestodiases: Neurocysticercosis and cystic echinococcosis

BackgroundNeurocysticercosis (NCC), and cystic echinococcosis (CE) are two neglected diseases caused by cestodes, co-endemic in many areas of the world. Imaging studies and serological tests are used in the diagnosis of both parasitic diseases, but cross-reactions may confound the results of the latter. The novel multiplex bead-based assay with recombinant antigens has been reported to increases the diagnostic accuracy of serological techniques.MethodologyWe set-up an immunoassay based on the multiplex bead-based platform (MBA), using the rT24H (against Cysticercus cellulosae, causing cysticercosis) and r2B2t (against Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato, causing CE) recombinant antigens, for simultaneous and differential diagnosis of these infections. The antigens were tested on 356 sera from 151 patients with CE, 126 patients with NCC, and 79 individuals negative for both diseases. Specificity was calculated including sera from healthy donors, other neurological diseases and the respective NCC or CE sera counterpart. The diagnostic accuracy of this assay was compared with two commercial ELISA tests, Novalisa and Ridascreen, widely used in the routine diagnosis of cysticercosis and CE, respectively.Main findingsFor the diagnosis of NCC, sensitivity ranged from 57.94–63.49% for the rT24H-MBA, and 40.48–46.03% for Novalisa ELISA depending on exclusion or inclusion of sera having equivocal results on ELISA from the analysis; specificities ranged from 90.87–91.30% and 70.43–76.96%, respectively. AUC values of the ROC curve were 0.783 (rT24H) and 0.619 (Novalisa) (p-value < 0.001). For the diagnosis of CE, the sensitivity of the r2B2t-MBA ranged from 68.87–69.77% and of Ridascreen ELISA from 50.00–57.62%; specificities from 92.47–92.68% and from 74.15–80.98%, respectively. AUC values were 0.717 and 0.760, respectively.Conclusions/SignificanceOverall, the recombinant antigens tested with the bead-based technology showed better diagnostic accuracy than the commercial assays, particularly for the diagnosis of NCC. The possibility of testing the same serum sample simultaneously for the presence of antibodies against both antigens is an added value particularly in seroprevalence studies for cysticercosis linked to control programs in endemic areas where these two parasites coexist.     

Serum chromogranin-alpha immunoradiometric assay in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is based on laboratory tests that demonstrate an increase in urinary excretion of catecholamines or their metabolites. Chromogranin A (CgA) is a member of the granin family and is widely distributed in neuroendocrine cells and particularly in chromaffin adrenal cells. Consequently, serum CgA increases in patients affected by pheochromocytoma and other diseases of the chromaffin system. AIM: This study investigated the performance of serum CgA assay in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and compared serum CgA with 24-hour urinary epinephrine (E), norepinephrine (NE), vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) and metanephrines (MNs). METHODS: We enrolled 15 patients with histologically proven pheochromocytoma; 100 healthy blood donors and 148 patients with essential hypertension were enrolled as controls. Serum CgA was assayed by a specific immunoradiometric method (IRMA). Urinary tests were done with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: Circulating CgA showed a higher sensitivity (1.00), specificity (0.96) and accuracy (0.96) than all other tests. Serum levels of CgA clearly increased from blood donors and patients with essential hypertension to patients with pheochromocytoma (p<0.0001). Furthermore, a strong relationship between serum CgA and tumor mass was found (p<0.0001). In conclusion, our data suggest that the CgA assay might be used as a single test for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.     

Immunoradiometric assay of chromogranin A in the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer: comparative evaluation with neuron-specific enolase

The aims of our work were 1) to determine the diagnostic performance of an immunoradiometric assay of chromogranin A (CgA) in small cell lung cancer and 2) to compare its discriminatory power with that of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), the marker currently used for SCLC. We selected 166 cases of small cell (64) and non-small cell (102) lung cancer and 106 cases of non-malignant lung diseases as controls. Both CgA and NSE were assayed by immunoradiometric methods and cutoff values were established on the basis of a pre-fixed specificity of 95% in non-malignant lung diseases. The CgA assay showed better diagnostic sensitivity than NSE in SCLC (61% versus 57%), especially in limited disease, and a low positivity rate in NSCLC with respect to NSE (14% versus 22%). By contrast, NSE reflected disease extent more accurately than CgA (U test: CgA p<0.05, NSE p<0.001). Finally, we found that the CgA assay was not affected by hemolysis whereas NSE serum levels greatly increased in hemolyzed sera. In conclusion, CgA assaying by an IRMA method is a reliable procedure in the diagnosis of SCLC. NSE remains the marker of choice in staging and monitoring of the disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the marker and its role in therapy monitoring and patient follow-up.     

抗哇巴因鸡蛋黄IgY与兔抗体IgG在酶联免疫检测中的比较

目的：探讨提高内源性哇巴因（EO）检测方法的准确性及特异性,为哇巴因的研究打下基础。方法：分别制备出鸡蛋黄抗哇巴因多克隆抗体及兔抗体。然后采用酶联免疫吸附法（ELISA）比较两种抗体检测内源性哇巴因的准确性及特异性。结果：采用IgY检测EO的平均批内变异系数为2．03％,批间变异系数为2．34％。兔抗体IgG则分别为2．83％、3．29％;两者均与氢化可的松及地塞米松无交叉结合反应,与西地兰和地高辛分别存在3．45％vs5．95％、3．20％vs5．20％的交叉反应。结论：IgY比兔抗体ELISA检测内源性哇巴因的特异性及准确性较高。     

Evaluation of OspA Vaccination-Induced Serological Correlates of Protection against Lyme Borreliosis in a Mouse Model

Background

For clinical development of a novel multivalent OspA vaccine against Lyme borreliosis, serological assays are required which can be used to establish immune correlates of protection against infection with Borrelia.

Methods

Four assays (an OspA IgG ELISA, a competitive inhibition (CI) ELISA, a Borrelia surface-binding (SB) assay and a Borrelia killing assay) were used to evaluate the correlation between immune responses induced by rOspA 1/2 (a chimeric immunogen containing protective epitopes from OspA serotypes 1 and 2), and protective immunity against infection by B. burgdorferi s.s. (OspA-1) and B. afzelii (OspA-2). Mice were immunized with OspA 1/2 doses ranging from 0.3 ng to 100 ng, to induce a range of OspA antibody titers, and exposed to needle challenge with B. burgdorferi s.s. or tick challenge with B. afzelii. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for each assay, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Youden Index were calculated. Potential cutoff antibody titers which could be used as correlates of vaccine-induced protection were derived from the maximum Youden Index.

Results

Immunization with OspA-1/2 provided dose-dependent protection against infection with B. burgdorferi s.s. and B. afzelii. Antibody responses detected by all four assays were highly significantly correlated with protection from infection by either B. burgdorferi s.s. (p<0.0001 to 0.0062) or B. afzelii (p<0.0001). ROC analyses of the diagnostic effectiveness of each assay showed the AUC to range between 0.95 and 0.79, demonstrating that all assays distinguish well between infected and non-infected animals. Based on sensitivity, specificity and AUC, the OspA IgG ELISA and SB assays best discriminated between infected and non-infected animals.

Conclusions

All four assays differentiate well between Borrelia-infected and non-infected animals. The relatively simple, high throughput IgG ELISA would be suitable to establish immune correlates of protection for the novel OspA vaccine in clinical trials.     

Evaluation of chromogranin A expression in serum and tissues of breast cancer patients

Human chromogranin A (CgA) is a member of the granin family and is widely distributed in large dense core granules of endocrine and neuroendocrine cells. A variety of non-neuroendocrine carcinomas arising in various tissues show patterns of neuroendocrine differentiation. Expression of CgA has been documented in epithelial cells of normal mammary gland as well as in breast cancers, and elevation of serum CgA has been detected in patients with breast cancer. Our study was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between serum CgA levels and neuroendocrine features in breast cancer. In addition, we evaluated the expression of serum CgA in patients affected by breast cancer compared to controls and the relationship between serum CgA and tumor histology, extent of disease, lymph node status, tumor stage and serum CA 15.3 levels. We enrolled 266 patients with infiltrating ductal or lobular breast carcinoma and a group of 100 age-matched healthy women serving as controls. Serum CgA and CA 15.3 were assayed by specific immunoradiometric methods. The overall sensitivity of CgA and CA 15.3 was 0.06 and 0.34, respectively (chi2 19.1, p<0.0005). No relationship was found between serum levels of CgA and tumor histology, extent of disease, lymph node status or tumor stage while serum levels of CA 15.3 were strongly correlated with all these variables but tumor histology. No relationship was found between serum levels of CgA and CA 15.3. Immunostaining against CgA, CgB, NSE and synaptophysin was performed on primary tumor tissue of 14 serum CgA-positive and 24 serum CgA-negative patients and was negative in all cases. We also evaluated eight cases of pathologically-proven neuroendocrine breast cancer: only four and two of these showed positive CgA immunostaining and increased serum CgA concentration, respectively. In conclusion, serum CgA assay offers no additional information regarding the presence, the extent and the histology of breast cancer compared to the CA 15.3 assay. Moreover, serum CgA was not an accurate marker to identify or exclude the rare neuroendocrine differentiation of breast cancer. We therefore conclude that CgA is not useful as a serum marker in breast cancer.     

Evaluation of the indirect and IgM‐capture anti‐human cytomegalovirus IgM ELISA methods as confirmed by cytomegalovirus IgG avidity

Primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection during pregnancy often results in congenital CMV infection with severe clinical complications. IgM antibodies are one of the indices of primary infection. The IgG avidity index (AI) is also known to remain low for 3 months after primary infection. Here, we evaluated and compared the performance of CMV IgM and IgG avidity assays. Because sensitivity and specificity reportedly differ between CMV IgM kits, CMV IgM detection was compared between the two commercially available ELISA kits that are most commonly used in Japan. Sera for CMV IgM were first screened using a traditional indirect ELISA kit. Selected samples were then tested for CMV IgM and CMV AI using a CMV IgM‐capture ELISA kit and a CMV IgG avidity assay, respectively. The rate of concordance between the IgM kits was 89% (42/47), indicating the absence of any significant difference. Most of the CMV IgM‐positive plasma samples showed high CMV IgG AI; however, 18 commercially available plasma samples with low CMV IgG AI were all CMV IgM‐positive. One plausible explanation for this discrepancy is that the duration of low IgG AI is shorter than that of IgM positivity. Alternatively, CMV IgM tests may generate pseudo‐positive readouts in cases of congenital infection. Nevertheless, our study confirms that CMV IgG AI can be a reliable indicator of CMV primary infection.     

A comparison of ELISA and RPLA for detection of Bacillus cereus diarrhoeal enterotoxin

Fourteen strains of Bacillus cereus isolated from different sources were examined for their ability to produce diarrhoeal enterotoxin by two commercial immunoassay kits (Oxoid BCET-RPLA and Tecra ELISA) and the microslide immunodiffusion assay. One strain that was positive in monkey feedings, as well as a number of other strains isolated from diarrhoeal outbreaks, gave positive results in the ELISA and negative results in the RPLA test systems. When tested in the microslide assay, these strains produced only one antigen which formed a line of identity with the reference toxin. The results of the control toxins provided with the kits substantiated that the two commercial assays did not detect the same antigen. Cultures positive with both assay kits were shown to produce diarrhoeal enterotoxin (by a line of identity) and other antigens in the microslide immunodiffusion assay.     

Measurements of chromogranin B can serve as a complement to chromogranin A

OBJECTIVE: CgA has been shown to be an excellent marker for neuroendocrine tumours. However, there are two major drawbacks with CgA measurements; elevated levels are common in patients with decreased renal function and in patients on treatment with proton pump inhibitors. These problems are not seen with CgB measurements. We have recently presented the development of 13 region-specific radioimmunoassays for measurements of CgB. A region-specific assay was identified, which measured higher concentrations of CgB than the other assays and seemed to be very useful as a marker for neuroendocrine tumours. The aim of the present study was therefore to further explore the diagnostic potential of this assay in the clinical management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours. METHODS: Measurements of CgB with two methods were compared with CgA in plasma samples from patients investigated for neuroendocrine tumours (N=86), patients with decreased renal function (N=35) and patients on treatment with proton pump inhibitors (N=29). RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity for the new CgB assay was almost as good as that for CgA. Furthermore, with CgB measurements we could avoid the falsely elevated levels of CgA found in patients with decreased renal function and treatment with proton pump inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the new CgB assay can serve as a complement to CgA measurements as an important tumour marker for neuroendocrine tumours.     

Significance of plasma chromogranin A determination in neuroendocrine tumour (NET) diagnosis

The secretory nature of NETs implies the determination of the CgA concentration as a standard marker. The concentration of CgA in plasma correlates with the degree of histopathological differentiation, tumor stage, and is an essential prerequisite for therapy. A retrospective analysis of the results of the plasma CgA concentrations in relation to histopathological and clinical findings (type of NET according to the WHO classification, severity of disease based on the presence of metastases and clinical symptoms) as well as somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was performed in 41 patients with NET. The patients were treated in The Regional Oncology of Lublin from February 2005 to May 2008. Data from the literature and results of this study suggest the use of CgA in the diagnosis and prognosis of NET. Plasma CgA concentration analysed together with histopathological assessment of tumor and the clinical picture is a useful marker in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours. High plasma CgA concentrations may indicate the presence of highly-differentiated NET (WDNEC), and also may indicate the presence of tumor metastasis. The highest CgA concentrations were observed in patients with neuroendocrine tumors associated with carcinoid symptoms and the presence of metastases to the liver.     

Octreotide suppression test in diagnosing and predicting the outcome of therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Preliminary report

INTRODUCTION: Chromogranin A (CgA) is a non-specific marker of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and is important in monitoring the disease course and NET treatment. AIM OF THE STUDY: Usefulness of suppression test of CgA secretion with octreotide in diagnosis and predicting the therapy outcome in NET patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 32 patients with NET of gastrointestinal tract, lung and of unknown origin. CgA level in blood plasma on fasting, before and 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after subcutaneous administration of 100 mug octreotide, was determined in all patients. The subjects were divided into two subgroups with relation to CgA level and to the results of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). RESULTS: Statistically significant CgA decrease after octreotide administration in all study time points and positive results of SRS were found in the patients with the elevated CgA level. No statistically significant decrease of CgA level after octreotide was found in the group with normal CgA levels. In this group, 13 patients had a negative result of SRS, and somatostatin receptors expression was found in one patient. Tolerance of somatostatin analogs (SSA) therapy was very good. CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide suppression test with CgA level assessment in NET patients is a simple, straightforward examination, providing information on the predicted response to the applied SSA and the data on initial clinical tolerance of those agents. This examination can also be a screening test useful in planning the treatment with SSA in patients with NET.     

Detection of Chlamydia suis from clinical specimens: comparison of PCR,antigen ELISA,and culture

Cell culture is still widely regarded as the gold standard in chlamydial diagnosis despite its well-known limitations in terms of sensitivity. On the other hand, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has emerged as a promising alternative because of rapidity and high sensitivity. However, validation of methodologies is required before the issue of standardization can be addressed. In the present study, 109 clinical samples (organ tissue, nasal, and faecal swabs) from pigs experimentally infected with Chlamydia suis were examined by cell culture, nested PCR in the ompA gene region, and two different antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in order to compare the diagnostic performance of these methods. Culture and PCR produced the highest proportion of concordant results (kappa coefficient 0.712). Among 99 samples, 34 were positive in both assays, 51 were negative in both assays, 12 culture-negatives were positive in PCR, and only 2 culture-positives were negative in PCR. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of PCR vs. culture as standard were 94.4% and 81.0%, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for culture vs. PCR as standard were 73.9% and 96.2%, respectively. Both ELISA tests performed considerably weaker. The data underline the potential of PCR as a powerful detection method for chlamydiae.     

Monoclonal Antibody-Based Dipstick Assay: A Reliable Field Applicable Technique for Diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni Infection Using Human Serum and Urine Samples

A field applicable diagnostic technique, the dipstick assay, was evaluated for its sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing human Schistosoma mansoni infection. A monoclonal antibody (mAb) against S. mansoni adult worm tegumental antigen (AWTA) was employed in dipstick and sandwich ELISA for detection of circulating schistosome antigen (CSA) in both serum and urine samples. Based on clinical and parasitological examinations, 60 S. mansoni-infected patients, 30 patients infected with parasites other than schistosomiasis, and 30 uninfected healthy individuals were selected. The sensitivity and specificity of dipstick assay in urine samples were 86.7% and 90.0%, respectively, compared to 90.0% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity of sandwich ELISA. In serum samples, the sensitivity and specificity were 88.3% and 91.7% for dipstick assay vs. 91.7% and 95.0% for sandwich ELISA, respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of dipstick assay in urine and serum samples was 88.3% and 90.0%, while it was 90.8% and 93.3% for sandwich ELISA, respectively. The diagnostic indices of dipstick assay and ELISA either in serum or in urine were statistically comparable (P>0.05). In conclusion, the dipstick assay offers an alternative simple, rapid, non-invasive technique in detecting CSA or complement to stool examinations especially in field studies.     

Interferon gamma release assay in diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis: a meta-analysis

Although interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) have been widely used for the diagnosis of latent and active tuberculosis in adults, a relative lack of validation studies in children has led to caution in their clinical interpretation. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated two IGRAs (ELISA and ELISPOT) and the tuberculin skin test (TST). We searched databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid) between January 2000 and January 2011 using search terms of latent tuberculosis infection or tuberculosis and interferon gamma release assay, or T-SPOT.TB test, or QuantiFERON-TB Gold, or ESAT-6, or CFP-10, and child, or childhood, or pediatrics. We also collected data by performing a manual search of references from relevant articles and communicating with selected authors. The meta-analysis was conducted with random effects models to account for heterogeneity between selected studies. The sensitivities of all three tests in active tuberculosis were similar. The pooled sensitivity was 70% for ELISA studies, 62% for ELISPOT studies and 71% for TST. Calculated sensitivities for IGRAs and the TST differ in culture-confirmed tuberculosis [ELISA (85%) vs. ELISPOT (76%) vs. TST (85%)] and clinical diagnosed cases [ELISA (64%) vs. ELISPOT (58%) vs. TST (66%)]. The pooled specificity was 100% for ELISA and 90% for ELISPOT, but was much lower for TST [56% in all included studies and 49% in children with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination]. The agreement between the TST and IGRAs in non-BCG-vaccinated children is higher than that in BCG-vaccinated children. In the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children, the TST and IGRAs have similar sensitivity. By contrast, the specificity of IGRAs is far greater than the TST, particularly in children with previous BCG vaccination.