PR55��, a Regulatory Subunit of PP2A, Specifically Regulates PP2A-mediated ��-Catenin Dephosphorylation

A central question in Wnt signaling is the regulation of β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Multiple kinases, including CKIα and GSK3, are involved in β-catenin phosphorylation. Protein phosphatases such as PP2A and PP1 have been implicated in the regulation of β-catenin. However, which phosphatase dephosphorylates β-catenin in vivo and how the specificity of β-catenin dephosphorylation is regulated are not clear. In this study, we show that PP2A regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation in vivo. We demonstrate that PP2A is required for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Drosophila. Moreover, we have identified PR55α as the regulatory subunit of PP2A that controls β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. PR55α, but not the catalytic subunit, PP2Ac, directly interacts with β-catenin. RNA interference knockdown of PR55α elevates β-catenin phosphorylation and decreases Wnt signaling, whereas overexpressing PR55α enhances Wnt signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that PR55α specifically regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation and plays an essential role in Wnt signaling.Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays essential roles in development and tumorigenesis (1–3). Our previous work found that β-catenin is sequentially phosphorylated by CKIα⁴ and GSK3 (4), which creates a binding site for β-Trcp (5), leading to degradation via the ubiquitination/proteasome machinery (3). Mutations in β-catenin or APC genes that prevent β-catenin phosphorylation or ubiquitination/degradation lead ultimately to cancer (1, 2).In addition to the involvement of kinases, protein phosphatases, such as PP1, PP2A, and PP2C, are also implicated in Wnt/β-catenin regulation. PP2C and PP1 may regulate dephosphorylation of Axin and play positive roles in Wnt signaling (6, 7). PP2A is a multisubunit enzyme (8–10); it has been reported to play either positive or negative roles in Wnt signaling likely by targeting different components (11–21). Toward the goal of understanding the mechanism of β-catenin phosphorylation, we carried out siRNA screening targeting several major phosphatases, in which we found that PP2A dephosphorylates β-catenin. This is consistent with a recent study where PP2A is shown to dephosphorylate β-catenin in a cell-free system (18).PP2A consists of a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac), a structure subunit (PR65/A), and variable regulatory B subunits (PR/B, PR/B′, PR/B″, or PR/B‴). The substrate specificity of PP2A is thought to be determined by its B subunit (9). By siRNA screening, we further identified that PR55α, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, specifically regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Mechanistically, we found that PR55α directly interacts with β-catenin and regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation in Wnt signaling.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Role of Partitioning-defective 1/Microtubule Affinity-regulating Kinases in the Morphogenetic Activity of Helicobacter pylori CagA

Helicobacter pylori CagA plays a key role in gastric carcinogenesis. Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA binds and deregulates SHP-2 phosphatase, a bona fide oncoprotein, thereby causing sustained ERK activation and impaired focal adhesions. CagA also binds and inhibits PAR1b/MARK2, one of the four members of the PAR1 family of kinases, to elicit epithelial polarity defect. In nonpolarized gastric epithelial cells, CagA induces the hummingbird phenotype, an extremely elongated cell shape characterized by a rear retraction defect. This morphological change is dependent on CagA-deregulated SHP-2 and is thus thought to reflect the oncogenic potential of CagA. In this study, we investigated the role of the PAR1 family of kinases in the hummingbird phenotype. We found that CagA binds not only PAR1b but also other PAR1 isoforms, with order of strength as follows: PAR1b > PAR1d ≥ PAR1a > PAR1c. Binding of CagA with PAR1 isoforms inhibits the kinase activity. This abolishes the ability of PAR1 to destabilize microtubules and thereby promotes disassembly of focal adhesions, which contributes to the hummingbird phenotype. Consistently, PAR1 knockdown potentiates induction of the hummingbird phenotype by CagA. The morphogenetic activity of CagA was also found to be augmented through inhibition of non-muscle myosin II. Because myosin II is functionally associated with PAR1, perturbation of PAR1-regulated myosin II by CagA may underlie the defect of rear retraction in the hummingbird phenotype. Our findings reveal that CagA systemically inhibits PAR1 family kinases and indicate that malfunctioning of microtubules and myosin II by CagA-mediated PAR1 inhibition cooperates with deregulated SHP-2 in the morphogenetic activity of CagA.Infection with Helicobacter pylori strains bearing cagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A)-positive strains is the strongest risk factor for the development of gastric carcinoma, the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1–3). The cagA gene is located within a 40-kb DNA fragment, termed the cag pathogenicity island, which is specifically present in the genome of cagA-positive H. pylori strains (4–6). In addition to cagA, there are ∼30 genes in the cag pathogenicity island, many of which encode a bacterial type IV secretion system that delivers the cagA-encoded CagA protein into gastric epithelial cells (7–10). Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA is localized to the plasma membrane, where it undergoes tyrosine phosphorylation at the C-terminal Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala motifs by Src family kinases or c-Abl kinase (11–14). The C-terminal Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala-containing region of CagA is noted for the structural diversity among distinct H. pylori isolates. Oncogenic potential of CagA has recently been confirmed by a study showing that systemic expression of CagA in mice induces gastrointestinal and hematological malignancies (15).When expressed in gastric epithelial cells, CagA induces morphological transformation termed the hummingbird phenotype, which is characterized by the development of one or two long and thin protrusions resembling the beak of the hummingbird. It has been thought that the hummingbird phenotype is related to the oncogenic action of CagA (7, 16–19). Pathophysiological relevance for the hummingbird phenotype in gastric carcinogenesis has recently been provided by the observation that infection with H. pylori carrying CagA with greater ability to induce the hummingbird phenotype is more closely associated with gastric carcinoma (20–23). Elevated motility of hummingbird cells (cells showing the hummingbird phenotype) may also contribute to invasion and metastasis of gastric carcinoma.In host cells, CagA interacts with the SHP-2 phosphatase, C-terminal Src kinase, and Crk adaptor in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner (16, 24, 25) and also associates with Grb2 adaptor and c-Met in a phosphorylation-independent manner (26, 27). Among these CagA targets, much attention has been focused on SHP-2 because the phosphatase has been recognized as a bona fide oncoprotein, gain-of-function mutations of which are found in various human malignancies (17, 18, 28). Stable interaction of CagA with SHP-2 requires CagA dimerization, which is mediated by a 16-amino acid CagA-multimerization (CM)² sequence present in the C-terminal region of CagA (29). Upon complex formation, CagA aberrantly activates SHP-2 and thereby elicits sustained ERK MAP kinase activation that promotes mitogenesis (30). Also, CagA-activated SHP-2 dephosphorylates and inhibits focal adhesion kinase (FAK), causing impaired focal adhesions. It has been shown previously that both aberrant ERK activation and FAK inhibition by CagA-deregulated SHP-2 are involved in induction of the hummingbird phenotype (31).Partitioning-defective 1 (PAR1)/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase (MARK) is an evolutionally conserved serine/threonine kinase originally isolated in C. elegans (32–34). Mammalian cells possess four structurally related PAR1 isoforms, PAR1a/MARK3, PAR1b/MARK2, PAR1c/MARK1, and PAR1d/MARK4 (35–37). Among these, PAR1a, PAR1b, and PAR1c are expressed in a variety of cells, whereas PAR1d is predominantly expressed in neural cells (35, 37). These PAR1 isoforms phosphorylate microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) and thereby destabilize microtubules (35, 38), allowing asymmetric distribution of molecules that are involved in the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity.In polarized epithelial cells, CagA disrupts the tight junctions and causes loss of apical-basolateral polarity (39, 40). This CagA activity involves the interaction of CagA with PAR1b/MARK2 (19, 41). CagA directly binds to the kinase domain of PAR1b in a tyrosine phosphorylation-independent manner and inhibits the kinase activity. Notably, CagA binds to PAR1b via the CM sequence (19). Because PAR1b is present as a dimer in cells (42), CagA may passively homodimerize upon complex formation with the PAR1 dimer via the CM sequence, and this PAR1-directed CagA dimer would form a stable complex with SHP-2 through its two SH2 domains.Because of the critical role of CagA in gastric carcinogenesis (7, 16–19), it is important to elucidate the molecular basis underlying the morphogenetic activity of CagA. In this study, we investigated the role of PAR1 isoforms in induction of the hummingbird phenotype by CagA, and we obtained evidence that CagA-mediated inhibition of PAR1 kinases contributes to the development of the morphological change by perturbing microtubules and non-muscle myosin II.     

Effect of Pin1 or Microtubule Binding on Dephosphorylation of FTDP-17 Mutant Tau

Neurodegenerative tauopathies, including Alzheimer disease, are characterized by abnormal hyperphosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein Tau. One group of tauopathies, known as frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17), is directly associated with mutations of the gene tau. However, it is unknown why mutant Tau is highly phosphorylated in the patient brain. In contrast to in vivo high phosphorylation, FTDP-17 Tau is phosphorylated less than wild-type Tau in vitro. Because phosphorylation is a balance between kinase and phosphatase activities, we investigated dephosphorylation of mutant Tau proteins, P301L and R406W. Tau phosphorylated by Cdk5-p25 was dephosphorylated by protein phosphatases in rat brain extracts. Compared with wild-type Tau, R406W was dephosphorylated faster and P301L slower. The two-dimensional phosphopeptide map analysis suggested that faster dephosphorylation of R406W was due to a lack of phosphorylation at Ser-404, which is relatively resistant to dephosphorylation. We studied the effect of the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1 or microtubule binding on dephosphorylation of wild-type Tau, P301L, and R406W in vitro. Pin1 catalyzes the cis/trans isomerization of phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro sequences in a subset of proteins. Dephosphorylation of wild-type Tau was reduced in brain extracts of Pin1-knockout mice, and this reduction was not observed with P301L and R406W. On the other hand, binding to microtubules almost abolished dephosphorylation of wild-type and mutant Tau proteins. These results demonstrate that mutation of Tau and its association with microtubules may change the conformation of Tau, thereby suppressing dephosphorylation and potentially contributing to the etiology of tauopathies.One of hallmarks of Alzheimer disease (AD)³ pathology is neurofibrillary tangles, which are composed of paired helical filaments (PHFs), aggregates of the abnormally phosphorylated microtubule-associated protein Tau. Intracellular inclusions comprising Tau are also found in several other neurodegenerative diseases, including Pick disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17), collectively called tauopathies (1–3). Identification of Tau as a causative gene of the inherited tauopathy FTDP-17 reveals that Tau mutation is sufficient to cause disease (4–6). However, the impact Tau mutations have on neurodegeneration remains unknown.Tau proteins in inclusions are hyperphosphorylated, and extensive studies have identified the phosphorylation sites; for example, more than 20 sites have been identified in PHF-Tau obtained from AD brains (7, 8). Tau can be phosphorylated by a variety of protein kinases, including glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5), mitogen-activated protein kinase, cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), microtubule affinity regulating kinase, and others (9–11). Tau is predominantly phosphorylated on the Ser or Thr residue in Ser/Thr-Pro sequences, suggesting the involvement of proline-directed protein kinases such as GSK3β and Cdk5 in hyperphosphorylation. A critical question is how mutations in Tau induce hyperphosphorylation in brain (12). Early phosphorylation experiments in vitro and in cultured cells have shown that mutant Tau is less phosphorylated than wild-type (WT) Tau (13–18). However, two later studies demonstrated higher phosphorylation of mutant Tau using brain extracts as a source of protein kinases in the presence of protein phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid (19) or in immortalized cortical cells (20). However, it is not fully understood how mutant Tau becomes highly phosphorylated in vivo.Tau hyperphosphorylation could also be attributed to reduced dephosphorylation activity. Tau is dephosphorylated in vitro by any of the major four classes of protein phosphatases, PP1, PP2A, PP2B, and PP2C, but PP2A is thought to be the major protein phosphatase that regulates Tau phosphorylation state in brains (21–23). PP2A activity reportedly is decreased in AD brain (24–26), and highly phosphorylated Tau in PHF is relatively resistant to dephosphorylation by PP2A (27). Few studies have been done on dephosphorylation of mutant Tau, however, and thus the mechanism remains unclear. One putative factor involved in mutant Tau dephosphorylation is the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase Pin1. Pin1 catalyzes the cis/trans isomerization of phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro sequences in a subset of proteins (28, 29). Pin1 is involved in AD pathogenesis as shown by the fact that it is found in neurofibrillary tangles and that Tau is hyperphosphorylated in Pin1-deficient mouse brains (30). Pin1 is indicated to facilitate Tau dephosphorylation via PP2A by binding to the phospho-Thr-231-Pro or phospho-Thr-212-Pro site (31–33). The effect of Pin1 on the stability of mutant Tau was recently reported (34), but a detailed analysis of Pin1 action on mutant Tau has not been reported. Another possible factor affecting dephosphorylation of mutant Tau is the binding to microtubules. We previously showed that phosphorylation of Tau is stimulated upon binding to microtubules (35). We thus hypothesized that binding to microtubules may also affect the extent of Tau dephosphorylation.Here, we examined the effects of Pin1 and binding to microtubules on dephosphorylation of WT and FTDP-17 mutant (P301L and R406W) Tau proteins that had been phosphorylated by Cdk5-p25 or Cdk5-p35. P301L and R406W are two distinct types of FTDP-17 mutants that have been studied well. We show for the first time how the regulation of Tau dephosphorylation can contribute to the observed Tau hyperphosphorylation in tauopathies.     

Differential Regulation of Glycogenolysis by Mutant Protein Phosphatase-1 Glycogen-targeting Subunits

PTG and G_L are hepatic protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) glycogen-targeting subunits, which direct PP1 activity against glycogen synthase (GS) and/or phosphorylase (GP). The C-terminal 16 amino residues of G_L comprise a high affinity binding site for GP that regulates bound PP1 activity against GS. In this study, a truncated G_L construct lacking the GP-binding site (G_Ltr) and a chimeric PTG molecule containing the C-terminal site (PTG-G_L) were generated. As expected, GP binding to glutathione S-transferase (GST)-G_Ltr was reduced, whereas GP binding to GST-PTG-G_L was increased 2- to 3-fold versus GST-PTG. In contrast, PP1 binding to all proteins was equivalent. Primary mouse hepatocytes were infected with adenoviral constructs for each subunit, and their effects on glycogen metabolism were investigated. G_Ltr expression was more effective at promoting GP inactivation, GS activation, and glycogen accumulation than G_L. Removal of the regulatory GP-binding site from G_Ltr completely blocked the inactivation of GS seen in G_L-expressing cells following a drop in extracellular glucose. As a result, G_Ltr expression prevented glycogen mobilization under 5 mm glucose conditions. In contrast, equivalent overexpression of PTG or PTG-G_L caused a similar increase in glycogen-targeted PP1 levels and GS dephosphorylation. Surprisingly, GP dephosphorylation was significantly reduced in PTG-G_L-overexpressing cells. As a result, PTG-G_L expression permitted glycogenolysis under 5 mm glucose conditions that was prevented in PTG-expressing cells. Thus, expression of constructs that contained the high affinity GP-binding site (G_L and PTG-G_L) displayed reduced glycogen accumulation and enhanced glycogenolysis compared with their respective controls, albeit via different mechanisms.Hepatic glycogen metabolism plays a central role in the maintenance of circulating plasma glucose levels under various physiological conditions. The rate-controlling enzymes in glycogen metabolism, glycogen synthase (GS)² and glycogen phosphorylase (GP), are subject to multiple levels of regulation, including allosteric binding of activators and inhibitors, protein phosphorylation, and changes in subcellular localization. GS is phosphorylated on up to 9 residues by a variety of kinases, although site 2 appears to be the most important regulator of hepatic GS (1). In contrast, GP is phosphorylated on a single N-terminal serine residue by phosphorylase kinase, which increases GP activity and its sensitivity to allosteric activators. Both GS and GP are in turn also regulated by protein phosphatases, most notably PP1. Although PP1 is a cytosolic protein, a family of five molecules has been reported that targets the enzyme to glycogen particles (2–7), whereas another two glycogen-targeting subunits have been putatively identified based on sequence homology (8). Published work has indicated that each targeting subunit confers differential regulation of PP1 activity by extracellular hormonal signals and/or intracellular changes in metabolites (9–11).Four PP1-glycogen-targeting proteins are expressed in rodent liver, although G_L and PTG/R5 have been most extensively studied (9, 12–15). G_L is present at higher levels in rat liver than PTG (12), but the expression of both proteins is subject to coordinate regulation by fasting/refeeding and insulin (12, 13). Previous studies indicated that the PTG-PP1 complex is primarily responsible for GP dephosphorylation and regulation of glycogenolysis (13, 16), whereas the G_L-PP1 complex preferentially mediates the activation of GS upon elevation of extracellular glucose (9, 13). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these differential properties of PTG and G_L have not been completely defined.Both PTG and G_L directly bind to specific PP1 substrates involved in glycogen metabolism, albeit for different physiological reasons. The extreme C-terminal 16 amino acids of G_L comprises a unique, high affinity binding site for phosphorylated GP (GPa (17)), which has been further delineated to two critical tyrosine residues (18, 37). Interaction of PP1 with G_L reduces phosphatase activity against GPa (3). In turn, GPa binding to the G_L-PP1 complex potently inhibits phosphatase activity against GS in vitro (3, 19) and regulates glycogen-targeted PP1 activity in liver cells and extracts (20–22). PTG contains a single substrate-binding site that interacts with GS and GP (5, 23). In contrast to the regulatory role of the GPa binding to G_L, interaction of substrates with PTG increases PP1 activity against these proteins (24). Indeed, disruption of the substrate-binding site by point mutagenesis abrogated the ability of mutant PTG expression to increase cellular glycogen levels (23), indicating an important role for substrate binding to the PTG-PP1 complex.Previous work has comprehensively compared the metabolic impact of PTG versus G_L overexpression in hepatocytes and thus was not the goal of this study (9, 10). Instead, two novel PP1 targeting constructs were generated in which the high affinity GPa-binding site was removed from G_L or added to the C terminus of PTG. The effects of expressing wild-type and mutant constructs on GS and GP activities and on the regulation of glycogen metabolism by extracellular glucose were investigated using primary mouse hepatocytes.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Phosphorylation-dependent Autoinhibition of Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase Accounts for Ca2+ Sensitization Force of Smooth Muscle Contraction

The reversible regulation of myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP) in response to agonist stimulation and cAMP/cGMP signals plays an important role in the regulation of smooth muscle (SM) tone. Here, we investigated the mechanism underlying the inhibition of MLCP induced by the phosphorylation of myosin phosphatase targeting subunit (MYPT1), a regulatory subunit of MLCP, at Thr-696 and Thr-853 using glutathione S-transferase (GST)-MYPT1 fragments having the inhibitory phosphorylation sites. GST-MYPT1 fragments, including only Thr-696 and only Thr-853, inhibited purified MLCP (IC₅₀ = 1.6 and 60 nm, respectively) when they were phosphorylated with RhoA-dependent kinase (ROCK). The activities of isolated catalytic subunits of type 1 and type 2A phosphatases (PP1 and PP2A) were insensitive to either fragment. Phospho-GST-MYPT1 fragments docked directly at the active site of MLCP, and this was blocked by a PP1/PP2A inhibitor microcystin (MC)-LR or by mutation of the active sites in PP1. GST-MYPT1 fragments induced a contraction of β-escin-permeabilized ileum SM at constant pCa 6.3 (EC₅₀ = 2 μm), which was eliminated by Ala substitution of the fragment at Thr-696 or by ROCK inhibitors or 8Br-cGMP. GST-MYPT1-(697–880) was 5-times less potent than fragments including Thr-696. Relaxation induced by 8Br-cGMP was not affected by Ala substitution at Ser-695, a known phosphorylation site for protein kinase A/G. Thus, GST-MYPT1 fragments are phosphorylated by ROCK in permeabilized SM and mimic agonist-induced inhibition and cGMP-induced activation of MLCP. We propose a model in which MYPT1 phosphorylation at Thr-696 and Thr-853 causes an autoinhibition of MLCP that accounts for Ca²⁺ sensitization of smooth muscle force.The contractile state of smooth muscle (SM)³ is driven by phosphorylation of the regulatory myosin light chain and reflects the balance of the Ca²⁺-calmodulin-dependent myosin light chain kinase and myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP) activities (1). The stoichiometry between force and [Ca²⁺] varies with different agonists (2), reflecting other signaling pathways that modulate the MLCP or myosin light chain kinase activities (3–5). Agonist activation of G-protein-coupled receptors triggers Ca²⁺ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Simultaneously, G-protein-coupled receptor signals are mediated by Ca²⁺-independent phospholipase A2 (6) and initiate kinase signals, such as PKC, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (7), and ROCK. These lead to inhibition of MLCP activity resulting in an increase in regulatory myosin light chain phosphorylation independent of a change in Ca²⁺ (Ca²⁺ sensitization) (for review, see Ref. 1). K⁺ depolarization can also activate RhoA in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner (8). Conversely, Ca²⁺ desensitization occurs when nitric oxide production and the activation of Gas elevate cGMP and cAMP levels in SM, leading to dis-inhibition and restoration of MLCP activity (9–15). Thus, MLCP plays a pivotal role in controlling phosphorylation of myosin, in response to physiological stimulation.MLCP is a trimeric holoenzyme consisting of a catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) δ isoform and a regulatory complex of MYPT1 and an accessory M21 subunit (16). A PP1 binding site, KVKF³⁸, is located at the N terminus of MYPT1 followed by an ankyrin-repeat domain. This N-terminal domain forms a part of the active site together with the catalytic subunit and controls the substrate specificity via allosteric interaction and targeting to loci (17). The C-terminal region of MYPT1 directly binds to substrates such as myosin and ezrin/radixin/moecin proteins as well as, under some conditions, the plasma membrane, tethering the catalytic subunit to multiple targets (18, 19). Furthermore, MYPT1 is involved in the regulation of MLCP activity. Alternative splicing of MYPT1 occurs in SM depending on the tissue and the developmental stage (20). An exon 13 splicing of MYPT1 is involved in Ca²⁺ sensitization that occurs in response to GTP (21), whereas a splice variant of MYPT1, containing the C-terminal Leu-zipper sequence, correlates with cGMP-dependent relaxation of smooth muscle (22). Direct binding of PKG to MYPT1 at the Leu-zipper domain and/or Arg/Lys-rich domain is involved in the activation of MLCP (23–25). In addition, a myosin phosphatase-Rho interacting protein (M-RIP) is directly associated with the MYPT1 C-terminal domain, proposed to recruit RhoA to the MLCP complex (26). The C-terminal region also binds to ZIP kinase, which phosphorylates MYPT1 at Thr-696⁴ (27). Thus, the C-terminal domain of MYPT1 functions as a scaffold for multiple phosphatase regulatory proteins.Phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-696 and Thr-853 and the phosphatase inhibitory protein CPI-17 at Thr-38 play dominant roles in the agonist-induced inhibition of MLCP (18, 28–34), yet the molecular mechanism(s) of MYPT1 inhibitory phosphorylation is poorly understood. Receptor activation induces biphasic contraction of SM, reflecting a sequential activation of PKC and ROCK. Phosphorylation of CPI-17 occurs first in parallel with Ca²⁺ release and the activation of a conventional PKC that causes Ca²⁺-dependent Ca²⁺ sensitization (35). A delayed activation of ROCK increases the phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-853. These phosphorylation events maintain the sustained phase of contraction after the fall in [Ca²⁺]_i (35). Phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-853 is elevated in response to various agonists (35, 36). Unlike the Thr-853 site, phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-696 is often spontaneously phosphorylated under resting conditions and insensitive to stimuli with most agonists (36). Nonetheless, up-regulation of MYPT1 phosphorylation at Thr-696 is reported in some types of hypertensive animals and patients, suggesting an importance of the site under pathological conditions (37–39). Phosphorylation of CPI-17 and MYPT1 at Thr-696 is reversed in response to nitric oxide production and cGMP elevation, which parallels relaxation (14, 15). Upon cGMP elevation, MYPT1 at Ser-695 is phosphorylated, and the Ser phosphorylation blocks the adjacent phosphorylation at Thr-696, causing dis-inhibition of MLCP (27, 40). However, Ser-695 phosphorylation does not cause the dephosphorylation at Thr-696 in intact cerebral artery (41). Thus, phosphorylation of MYPT1 governs Ca²⁺ sensitization and desensitization of SM, although the underlying mechanisms are still controversial. In addition, telokin, a dominant protein in visceral and phasic vascular SM tissues, is phosphorylated by PKG and PKA, activating MLCP by an unknown mechanism and inducing SM relaxation (42).Multiple mechanisms have been suggested for the phosphorylation-dependent inhibition of MLCP. Thiophosphorylation of MYPT1 results in lower V_m and higher K_m values of MLCP activity, suggesting that allosteric modulation of the active site is necessary for the thiophosphorylation-dependent inhibition of MLCP (43). On the other hand, translocation of MYPT1 to the plasma membrane region occurs in parallel with the phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-696 (44, 45), but the amount translocated and the functional meaning remain controversial (41). Phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-853 in vitro reduces its affinity for phospho-myosin, thus suppressing the phosphatase activity (18). It has also been demonstrated that reconstitution of thiophosphorylated MYPT1 at Thr-696 or Thr-853 with isolated PP1δ produces a less-active form of MLCP complex (46). This supports the kinetic analysis (43) that suggests an allosteric effect of MYPT1 phosphorylation on the phosphatase activity. In contrast, a thiophosphopeptide mimicking the phosphorylation site of MBS85, a homolog of MYPT1 and not present in SM, inhibits the activity of MBS85·PP1 complex, suggesting the direct interaction between the MBS85 site and PP1 (47). In the crystal structure model of MYPT1-(1–229). PP1δ complex, the electrostatic potential map at the MLCP active site complements amino acid profiles around the phosphorylation sites (17). Therefore, it is possible that the inhibitory phosphorylation sites directly dock at the active site of MLCP and inhibit the activity. Here, we examine mechanisms underlying the inhibition of MLCP through the phosphorylation of MYPT1 at Thr-696 and Thr-853 using GST fusion versions of various MYPT1 fragments including or excluding either or both of these phosphorylation sites. Phosphorylated MYPT1 fragments including either Thr-696 or Thr-853 potently and specifically inhibit MLCP purified from pig aorta and the enzyme associated with myofilaments in permeabilized ileum SM tissues. We further show that inhibition of MLCP in SM tissues is eliminated by activation of PKA/PKG, suggesting that the GST-MYPT1 fragments mimic agonist-induced autoinhibition and cAMP/cGMP-dependent dis-autoinhibition of MLCP in SM.