The effects of stimulus rates upon median,ulnar and radial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials

We examined the effect of stimulus rates on the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude following stimulation of the median nerve (MN) and the ulnar nerve (UN) at the elbow or wrist, and the radial nerve (RN) at the wrist in 12 normal subjects. We measured the amplitude of frontal (P14-N18-P22-N30) and parietal peaks (P14-N20-P26-N34) at a stimulus rate of 1.1, 3.5 and 5.7 Hz. The amplitude attenuation was found at frontal P22 and N30 and to a lesser degree at parietal N20 and P26 peaks with an increasing stimulus rate from 1.1 to 5.7 Hz. The amplitude attenuation was greatest at the elbow when compared to the wrist stimulation for both MN and UN. The attenuation was least for wrist stimulation for the RN. The UN block by local anesthesia just distal to the stimulus electrode at the elbow abolished the amplitude attenuation caused by the fast stimulus rate. The observed amplitude attenuation with the faster stimulus rate is probably due, in part, to interference from the “secondary” afferent inputs. The secondary afferent inputs arise from peripheral receptor stimulation (muscle, joint and/or cutaneous) as a subsequent effect of efferent volleys initiated from the point of stimulation. The greater number of peripheral receptors being activated as more proximal sites of stimulation in a mixed nerve would result in greater attenuation of the SEP recorded from scalp electrodes. We postulate that the attenuation of frontal peaks by the fast stimulus rate is due to the frontal projection of interfering “secondary” afferent inputs.     

Prognostic value of frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials in severe head injury: a long-term follow-up study

We have shown that the combined analysis of the frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked response (SEP) improves the global short-term outcome prediction in severe head injury (SHI) after 3–6 months. In the present study the same pateints were reexamined 18 months after trauma and the prognostic value of the combined SEP parameters reassessed, in particular their value of predicting the exact Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) class reached (as opposed to a crude good or bad distinction). Frontal (P20/22, N30) and parietal (N20) SEP components were studied in 50 patients within 72 h after the injury and were related to the GOS after 3–6 months and again after 18 months. When both frontal and parietal components were used as predictors, discriminant analysis correctly classified 76% of the patients after 3–6 months and 82% after 18 months. Considering parietal SEP alone, classification was less accurate (74% after 3–6 months, and 68% after 18 months) and misclassifications were more severe. Our results show that (i) a combined analysis of frontal and parietal components of the SEP improves and refines the outcome prediction in SHI, (ii) the predictive power of the combined approach increases with time after trauma, while that of the parietal response alone decreases.     

Origin of frontal N15 component of somatosensory evoked potential in man

Origin of the frontal somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) by median nerve stimulation was investigated in normal volunteers and in patients with localized cerebrovascular diseases, and the following results were obtained.

• 1.(1) In normal subjects, SEPs recorded at F3 (or F4) contralateral to the stimulating median nerve were composed of P12, N15, P18.5 and N26. Similar components were recognized in SEP recorded at Fz.
• 2.(2) In patients in whom putaminal or thalamic hemorrhages had destroyed the posterior limbs of the internal capsules, frontal N15 and parietal N18 (N20) disappeared. These components were also absent in patients with cortical (parietal) infarctions. Among these patients, the thalamus was not affected in cases with putaminal hemorrhages and cortical infarctions.

These facts indicate that the generator of the frontal N15 does not exist in the thalamus but that it originates from the neural structure central to the internal capsule, which suggests a similarity to the generator of the parietal N18.Because N15 was recorded in the midline of the frontal region with shorter latency than parietal N18, the frontal N15 might represent a response to the sensory input of the frontal lobe via the non-specific sensory system.     

Gating of the early components of the frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials in different sensory-motor interference modalities

Three different interfering conditions were studied during the recording of pre- and postcentral somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following median nerve stimulation at the wrist in 16 normal subjects: active finger movement (MVT), light superficial massage (LSM) and deep muscular massage (DMM) of the hand. Special attention was focused on selective effects on individual SEP components. The frontal N₃₀ component showed the most significant amplitude reduction during the three interfering conditions (76.4% of reduction in MVT, 36.4% in DMM and 32.9% in LSM). In contrast the frontal N₂₃ was not significantly changed and the preceding P₂₂ component was only reduced in the MVT condition.Postcentral N₂₀ was unchanged by the three conditions while P₂₇ was clearly gated by movement but not significantly by LSM and DMM. The three interfering conditions enhanced the parietal N₃₂ and had no significant effect on the parietal P₄₅.An important point was the interindividual variability of these effects and it appeared that group average wave forms would therefore be confusing.The peak latency of some SEP components was changed during the interfering conditions. The most important effect was an increase of postcentral P45 latency which was found to be related to the amplitude enhancement of N₃₂.     

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. Apomorphine-induced transient potentiation of frontal components Clin. Parkinson's disease and in parkinsonism

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation have been recorded from parietal and frontal districts Clin. 43 parkinsonians, 17 patients with parkinsonism and 35 healthy controls matched for age and sex. Latency/ amplitude characteristics of the parietal P14-N20-P25 and of the frontal P20-N30-P40 wave complexes before and after (10, 20, 30 and 60 min) subcutaneous administration of apomorphine chloride were evaluated Clin. all the 60 patients and Clin. 3 controls. The frontal waves N30 and P40 were either absent or significantly smaller than normal Clin. 31 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) (72.1%) and Clin. 9 with parkinsonism Clin. baseline records (56.3%). Following apomorphine, the parietal deflections did not significantly vary Clin. amplitude. On the contrary, the frontal complex showed a significant amplitude increase Clin. 27 PD and 8 parkinsonisms (respectively 62.8 and 47.1%): 79.1% of PD and 35.3% of parkinsonisms were improved clinically. Amplitude increase was evident at 10 min after apomorphine, Clin. parallel with clinical improvement, and vanished nearly Clin. coincidence with the end of the clinical effect.     

Right or left ear reference changes the voltage of frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials

Short-latency cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to left median nerve stimulation were recorded with either the left or right earlobe as reference. With a right earlobe reference the voltage of the parietal N20 and P27 was reduced while the voltage of the frontal P20 and N30 was enhanced. The effects were consistent, but their size varied with the SEP component considered and also among the subjects. Analysis of SEPs at different scalp sites and at either earlobe suggested that the ear contralateral to the side stimulated picked up transient potential differences, depending a.o. on side asymmetry and geometry of the neural generators as disclosed in topographic mapping. For example, the right ear potential can be shifted negatively by the right N20 field evoked by left median nerve stimulation. The changes involve the absolute potential values, but not the time features of the gradients of potential fields. Scalp current density (SCD) maps are not affected. The results are pertinent for current discussions about which reference to use and document the practical recommendation of recording short-latency cortical SEPs with a reference at the ear ipsilateral (not contralateral) to the side of stimulation.     

Abnormalities of parietal and prerolandic somatosensory evoked potentials in Huntington's disease

Cervical, parietal and prerolandic somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation at the wrist were recorded with an earlobe reference in 24 patients with Huntington's disease (HD) and in 24 age-matched normal controls. Cortical responses of abnormal wave form and reduced amplitude were constantly observed in HD patients. SEP changes affected more severely the prerolandic (P22/N30) pattern, which could not be recognized in two-thirds of patients, than the parietal (N20/P27) pattern, which could be identified in all cases. The N20 latency and the central conduction time (N13–N20 interval) were significantly increased. The occurrence of abnormalities of central conduction and of a predominant involvement of the prerolandic SEP pattern suggests an impairment of impulse transmission along the somatosensory lemniscal pathway at subcortical, possibly thalamic, level in HD.     

Monitoring of subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy: comparison with stump pressure levels

Monitoring of multichannel somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) has been performed in 40 cases of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). SEPs were obtained after median nerve stimulation at wrist, recording from 2nd cervical and from the scalp parietal (ipsi- and contralateral) and central (contralateral) positions. The reduction of CBF due to clamping of the carotid artery provoked SEP abnormalities in 10 of the 40 cases. None of the 30 patients with unmodified SEPs developed post-surgical neurological sequelae.SEP alterations were characterized exclusively by amplitude decrements and latency increases of the cortical components, the subcortical ones being unaffected. In 5 of these patients, SEPs returned to normal values before the end of the intervention and no neurological deficit was observed on awakening. In the remaining 5 cases SEPs retained their abnormalities and patients developed post-surgery neurological sequelae (4 immediately, 1 the day after).SEP alterations affected parietal and central components to a similar extent; however, in a few cases cerebral blood flow deficits provoked by carotid clamping modified differently the central P22 and the parietal N20–P25 waves.Comparisons with stump (back) pressure in the carotid artery revealed a higher sensitivity of the SEP technique in detecting vascularization problems due to carotid clamping.The time course of the appearance of SEP abnormalities seems to discriminate alterations secondary to collateral revascularization from those determined by embolization.     

Giant central N20-P22 with normal area 3b N20-P20: an argument in favour of an area 3a generator of early median nerve cortical SEPs?

Generators of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) still remain to be precisely localised. This gap in knowledge has often resulted in unclear and contrasting SEPs localisation in patients with focal hemispheric lesions. We recorded SEPs to median nerve stimulation in a patient with right frontal astrocytoma, using a 19-channel recording technique. After stimulation of the left median nerve, N20 amplitude was normal when recorded by the parietal electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while it was abnormally enhanced in traces obtained by the contralateral central electrode. The amplitude of the frontal P20 response was within normal limits. This finding suggests that two dipolar sources, tangential and radial to the scalp surface, respectively, contribute concomitantly to N20 generation. The possible location of the N20 radial source in area 3a is discussed. The P22 potential was also recorded with increased amplitude by the central electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while N30 amplitude was normal in frontal and central traces. We propose that the radial dipolar source of P22 response is independent from both N20 and N30 generators and can be located either in 3a or in area 4. This report illustrates the usefulness of multichannel recordings in diagnosing dysfunction of the sensorimotor cortex in focal cortical lesions.     

The N18 component of the median nerve SEP is not reduced by vibration

Objective: To study the interference of mechanical vibration of the palm of the hand on the median nerve short-latency SEP components.Methods: Electrically-elicited short-latency median nerve SEP were obtained before and during mechanical vibration (120 Hz) of the palm in two groups of normal individuals (6 in group I and 9 in group II). The amplitude of the different components was compared between the two conditions through non-parametric statistical tests.Results: A significant reduction in the amplitude of the N9, P13/14 and N20 components was detected, however no overall significant changes were detected for the N18 component.Conclusions: Vibration interference reduced all studied components except the N18, these findings are interpreted as supporting evidence for the proposed association between the N18 component and the inhibitory activities elicited in the dorsal column nuclei.     

Dissociation induced by voluntary movement between two different components of the centro-parietal P40 SEP to tibial nerve stimulation

Whether the two earliest cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to tibial nerve stimulation (N37 and P40) are generated by the same dipolar source or, instead, originate from different neuronal populations is still a debated problem. We recorded the early scalp SEPs to tibial nerve stimulation in 10 healthy subjects at rest and during voluntary movement of the stimulated foot. We found that the P40, which reached its highest amplitude on the vertex at rest, changed its topography during movement, since its amplitude was reduced much more in the central than in the parietal traces. These findings suggest that two different components contribute to the centro-parietal positivity at rest: (1) the P37 response, which is parietally distributed and is not modified by movement, and (2) the `real' P40 SEP, which is focused on the vertex and is reduced in amplitude during voluntary movement. Since, also, the N37 response did not vary its amplitude under interference condition, it is possible that the N37 and P37 potentials are generated by the same dipolar source. Other later components, namely P50 and N50, were significantly reduced in amplitude during foot movement. Lastly, the subcortical P30 far-field remained unchanged and this suggests that the phenomenon of amplitude reduction during movement (i.e. gating) occurs above the cervico-medullary junction.     

SEPs to finger joint input lack the N20-P20 response that is evoked by tactile inputs: contrast between cortical generators in areas 3b and 2 in humans

A method using a DC servo motor is described to produce brisk angular movements at finger interphalangeal joints in humans. Small passive flexions of 2° elicited sizable somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) starting with a contralateral positive P34 parietal response thought to reflect activation of a radial equivalent dipole generator in area 2 which receives joint inputs. By contrast, electric stimulation of tactile (non-joint) inputs from the distal phalanx evoked the usual contralateral negative N20 reflecting a tangential equivalent dipole generator in area 3b. Finger joint inputs also evoked a precentral positivity equivalent to the P22 of motor area 4, and a large frontal negativity equivalent to N30. It is suggested that natural stimulation allows human SEP components to the differentiated in conjunction with distinct cortical somatotopic projections.     

The effect of stimulus frequency on post- and pre-central short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)

We assessed the influence of the stimulus frequency on short-latency SEPs recorded over the parietal and frontal scalp of 26 subjects to median nerve stimulation and 16 subjects to digital nerve stimulation. When the stimulus frequency is increased from 1.6 Hz to 5.7 Hz, the amplitude of the N13 potential decreases whereas the P14 remains stable. The amplitude of the N20 is not changed significantly whereas the P22, the P27 and the N30 decrease significantly. In 50% of the subjects 2 components can be seen within the frontal negativity that follows the P22: an early ‘N24’ component, which is not affected by the stimulus rate, and the later N30, which is highly sensitive to the stimulus frequency. The distinct amplitude changes of the N20 and P22 with increasing stimulus frequency is one among other arguments to show that these potentials arise from separate generators.     

Bit-mapped somatosensory evoked potentials and muscular reflex responses in man: comparative analysis in different experimental protocols

Bit-colour maps of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and muscular responses from forearm and hand muscles were simultaneously recorded after median nerve stimulation. Subjects were asked either to relax totally (A), or to contract the examined muscle continuously and isometrically at 10–20% (B) and 80–100% (C) of the maximal strength. Isotonic contractions ipsilateral (D) and contralateral to the stimulus (E) were also examined. Both SEPs and EMG responses were elicited by individual near-motor threshold pulses delivered at 0.2/sec to the median nerve at the elbow. SEPs were maximal in amplitude during complete relaxation, whilst all the components following the parietal N20 were depressed by muscle contraction. Such decrements affected predominantly the parietal and frontal peaks of positive polarity during condition B, whilst the frontal negative component (wave N30) dropped remarkably in conditions C and D. Early EMG responses (V1 = spinal circuitry) were usually absent in condition A; they were present together with later components (= V2 possibly long-loop, transcortical circuitry) in C and D, whilst they were alone recordable in B and E. The amplitudes of the frontal wave N30 in SEPs and of V2 in LLRs were inversely correlated. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that a change in the reactivity of the sensorimotor brain areas to afferent impulses is coupled to LLR elicitation in forearm and hand muscles.     

Scalp topography and distribution of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation

Topographies and distributions of cortical SEPs to median nerve stimulation were studied in 8 normal adults and 5 neurological patients. SEPs recorded from C4, P4, Pz, T6-A1A2 derivations to left median nerve stimulation were composed of 2 early negative (N16, N20) and 2 positive components (P12, P23), whereas those recorded from frontal electrodes (Fz, Fp1, Fp2) disclosed 2 early negativities (N16, N24) and 2 early positivities (P12, P20). N20 and P20, and P23 and N24, reversed across the rolandic fissure with no significant difference in their peak latencies. P23 was of slightly shorter latency at C4 than at more posterior electrodes (P4, T6, Pz).In 3 patients with complete hemiplegia but normal sensation, all the early SEP components were normal in scalp distribution and peak latencies except for a decrease of N24 amplitude. In 2 patients with complete hemiplegia and sensory loss no early cortical SEPs were seen. These findings suggest that N20 and P20 are generated as a single horizontal dipole in the central fissure, whereas P23 and N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and postrolandic regions.     

Latency and amplitude abnormalities of the scalp far-field P14 to median nerve stimulation in multiple sclerosis. A SEP study of 122 patients recorded with a non-cephalic reference montage

The frequency and characteristics of P14 abnormalities were investigated in 122 patients with probable (68), or definite (54) multiple sclerosis by recording SEPs to median nerve stimulation with a non-cephalic reference montage. The most frequent SEP abnormality found in our series (62% of abnormal results) combined latency increase and amplitude reduction of P14. Interindividual variability, inherent in absolute amplitude measurements, was by-passed by calculating the ration between the amplitudes of far-field P9 and P14 components, which proved to be normally distributed in controls. In spite of the strong association (P ⪡ 0.001) between the P9–P14 interpeak interval (IPL) and the P9/P14 amplitude ratio in MS patients, the latter parameter was found to be the only abnormality in 12 patients whose P9–P14 and P14–N20 IPLs were normal. Also IPLs were increased in 12 patients with normal P14 amplitudes. These results suggest that adding the P9/P14 amplitude criterion to standard IPL data might be useful to detect conduction troubles in MS patients.     

Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in Down's syndrome

Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following median nerve stimulation were recorded in 42 patients with Down's syndrome and in 42 age- and sex-matched normal subjects. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the absolute peak latencies of N9, N11 and N13 components. However, interpeak latencies, N9-N11, N11-N13 and N9-N13, were prolonged significantly in Down's syndrome. These findings suggest impaired impulse conduction in the proximal part of the brachial plexus, posterior roots and/or posterior column-medial lemniscal pathway. Interpeak latency N13-N20, representing conduction time from cervical cord to sensory cortex, was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Cortical potentials N20 and P25 in the parietal area and P20 and N25 in the frontal area were of significantly larger amplitude in Down's syndrome. P25 had double peaks in 16 of 42 normal subjects, but these were not apparent in any of the patients.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials at rest and during movement in Parkinson's disease: evidence for a specific apomorphine effect on the frontal N30 wave

Studies attempting to relate the abnormalities of the frontal N30 components of the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) have shown contradictory results. We recorded the frontal and parietal SEPs to median nerve stimulation in 2 groups of PD patients: a group of 17 patients presenting the wearing-off phenomenon, and a group of 10 untreated PD patients. The results were compared with a group of 13 healthy volunteers of the same age and with a group of 10 non-parkinsonian patients. All parkinsonian and non-parkinsonian patients were studied before (“off” condition) and after a subcutaneous injection of apomorphine (“on” condition). The gating effects of a voluntary movement (clenching of the hand) on the SEPs were also studied for the wearing-off group of PD patients (in states off and on) in comparison with the healthy subjects. At rest and in the off condition the amplitude of the frontal N30 was significantly reduced in the 2 groups of PD patients. We demonstrate that the movement gating ability of the PD patient is preserved in spite of the reduced amplitude of the frontal N30. This result suggests that the specific change in the frontal N30 in PD is not the consequence of a continuous gating of the sensory inflow by a motor corollary discharge. Clinical motor improvement induced by apomorphine was associated with a significant enhancement of the frontal N30 wave. In contrast, the subcortical P14 and N18 waves and the cortical N20, P22, P27 and N45 were not statistically modified by the drug. Apomorphine infusion did not change the absolute reduced voltage of the N30 reached during the movement gating. While the frontal N30 component of the non-parkinsonian patients was significantly lower in comparison to healthy subjects, this wave did not change after the apomorphine administration. In the wearing-off PD patient group the frontal N30 increment was positively correlated with the number of off hours per day. This specific apomorphine sensitivity of the frontal N30 was interpreted as a physiological index of the dopaminergic modulatory control exerted on the neuronal structures implicated in the generation of the frontal N30.     

Dynamic Changes in Phase-Amplitude Coupling Facilitate Spatial Attention Control in Fronto-Parietal Cortex

Attention is a core cognitive mechanism that allows the brain to allocate limited resources depending on current task demands. A number of frontal and posterior parietal cortical areas, referred to collectively as the fronto-parietal attentional control network, are engaged during attentional allocation in both humans and non-human primates. Numerous studies have examined this network in the human brain using various neuroimaging and scalp electrophysiological techniques. However, little is known about how these frontal and parietal areas interact dynamically to produce behavior on a fine temporal (sub-second) and spatial (sub-centimeter) scale. We addressed how human fronto-parietal regions control visuospatial attention on a fine spatiotemporal scale by recording electrocorticography (ECoG) signals measured directly from subdural electrode arrays that were implanted in patients undergoing intracranial monitoring for localization of epileptic foci. Subjects (n = 8) performed a spatial-cuing task, in which they allocated visuospatial attention to either the right or left visual field and detected the appearance of a target. We found increases in high gamma (HG) power (70–250 Hz) time-locked to trial onset that remained elevated throughout the attentional allocation period over frontal, parietal, and visual areas. These HG power increases were modulated by the phase of the ongoing delta/theta (2–5 Hz) oscillation during attentional allocation. Critically, we found that the strength of this delta/theta phase-HG amplitude coupling predicted reaction times to detected targets on a trial-by-trial basis. These results highlight the role of delta/theta phase-HG amplitude coupling as a mechanism for sub-second facilitation and coordination within human fronto-parietal cortex that is guided by momentary attentional demands.     

Topography of somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation in patients with cerebral lesions

Scalp distributions and topographies of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation were studied in 22 patients with 5 different types of cerebral lesion due to cerebrovascular disease or tumor (thalamic, postcentral subcortical, precentral subcortical, diffuse subcortical and parieto-occipital lesions) in order to investigate the origins of frontal (P20, N24) and central-parietal SEPs (N20, P22, P23).In 2 patients with thalamic syndrome, N16 was delayed in latency and N20/P20 were not recorded. No early SEP except for N16 was recorded in 2 patients with pure hemisensory loss due to postcentral subcortical lesion. In all 11 patients with pure hemiparesis or hemiplegia due to precentral subcortical lesion N20/P20 and P22, P23/N24 components were of normal peak latencies. The amplitude of N24 was significantly decreased in all 3 patients with complete hemiplegia. These findings support the hypothesis that N20/P20 are generated as a horizontal dipole in the central sulcus (3b), whereas P23/N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and post-rolandic fissures. P22 was very localized in the central area contralateral to the stimulation.Topographical studies of early cortical SEPs are useful for detecting each component in abnormal SEPs