Evoked potential findings in Behçet's disease. Brain-stem auditory,visual, and somatosensory evoked potentials in 44 patients

We studied 54 patients with Behçet's disease, 41 males and 13 females, mean age 28 years. Forty-four patients had auditory brain-stem evoked potential (BAEP) recordings, 39 had pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP), 27 had median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings, and 25 tibial nerve SEPs. BAEPs were abnormal in 16 patients (52%) with neurological manifestations and in 4 (31%) without, because of decreased amplitude of wave V, prolonged I–III or III–V interpeak latencies, or uncertain/absent waves III and/or V. Eleven patients (40%) with neurological symptoms and 3 patients (25%) without, had abnormal VEPs. Absent potentials, decreased amplitude, with or without prolonged P100 latency, were found in 75% of the cases, the rest had prolonged P100 latency only. Median SEPs were abnormal in 8 patients (38%) with neurological manifestations. Four patients (21%) had abnormal tibial SEPs. Decreased amplitude with or without mild slowing in central conduction was the predominant SEP abnormality. SEPs were normal in all patients without neurological symptoms. In total, 84% of patients with, and 38% of patients without, neurological symptoms had abnormalities of one or more EP modality.When used cautiously, EP studies in Behçet's disease might be helpful to separate neuro-Behçet from other disorders with similar symptomatology, to disclose subclinical CNS involvement, to evaluate and monitor CNS disease activity, and to provide objective measures of treatment response.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in syringomyelia

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median and posterior tibial stimulation were obtained in 22 patients with syringomyelia. All patients had magnetic resonance imaging (MR) which defined the maximum transverse diameter of the syrinx as well as its longitudinal extension. SEP was abnormal in 16 (72%) patients. Median and posterior tibial SEPs were abnormal in 11 and 15 patients respectively. Both tests were abnormal in 10 patients. Ten patients showed absence of one or more central potentials (P/N13, N20, N22) and 7 patients demonstrated increased conduction times (N9–N20, P/N13–N20, N22–P40). The mean maximum transverse diameter of the syrinx was 7.5 mm in patients with normal SEPs and 16.2 mm in patients with abnormal SEPs. Abnormal SEP was observed in all 5 patients with loss of position sense, in 9 of 13 (69%) with loss of superficial pain and temperature, and 1 of 2 patients with motor deficit only. Central SEP abnormalities were observed in 3 of 5 patients with sensory deficits indistinguishable from a peripheral neuropathy and in 2 patients in the asymptomatic extremity. Three of 4 patients with syringomyelia and Chiari malformation had a normal SEP.     

Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation in Down's syndrome

Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were studied in 40 patients with Down's syndrome and in age- and gender-matched healthy controls as well as in middle-aged and aged healthy subjects. In median nerve SEPs, latencies of the initial cortical potentials, N18 and P18, showed no significant difference, but the following potentials N22, P25, N32, P41 and P46 were relatively or significantly shorter in latency in Down's patients than in the controls. Amplitudes of all components in Down's patients were significantly larger than those of age- and gender-matched controls as well as of those of middle-aged healthy subjects, but there was only a small difference in their amplitudes from aged healthy subjects. Results of posterior tibial nerve SEPs were generally consistent with those of median nerve SEPs. Therefore, ‘short latency with large amplitude’ is the main characteristic of middle-latency SEPs in Down's syndrome, possibly related to accelerated physiological aging of the central nervous system.     

The value of ulnar somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in cervical myelopathy

In 57 patients with clinical signs and surgical documentation of compressive myelopathy, ulnar nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were more sensitive (with 74% abnormal) than either median or tibial nerve SEPs. The most frequent abnormalities were reduced or absent neck evoked responses and prolonged central conduction time. All subjects who had an SEP abnormality were identified by combined tibial and ulnar SEPs. Median nerve SEP added no additional information. Normal ulnar and tibial nerve SEPs were also able to exclude major cord damage in patients with cervical radiculopathy but little evidence of myelopathy.     

Monitoring of subcortical and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy: comparison with stump pressure levels

Monitoring of multichannel somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) has been performed in 40 cases of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). SEPs were obtained after median nerve stimulation at wrist, recording from 2nd cervical and from the scalp parietal (ipsi- and contralateral) and central (contralateral) positions. The reduction of CBF due to clamping of the carotid artery provoked SEP abnormalities in 10 of the 40 cases. None of the 30 patients with unmodified SEPs developed post-surgical neurological sequelae.SEP alterations were characterized exclusively by amplitude decrements and latency increases of the cortical components, the subcortical ones being unaffected. In 5 of these patients, SEPs returned to normal values before the end of the intervention and no neurological deficit was observed on awakening. In the remaining 5 cases SEPs retained their abnormalities and patients developed post-surgery neurological sequelae (4 immediately, 1 the day after).SEP alterations affected parietal and central components to a similar extent; however, in a few cases cerebral blood flow deficits provoked by carotid clamping modified differently the central P22 and the parietal N20–P25 waves.Comparisons with stump (back) pressure in the carotid artery revealed a higher sensitivity of the SEP technique in detecting vascularization problems due to carotid clamping.The time course of the appearance of SEP abnormalities seems to discriminate alterations secondary to collateral revascularization from those determined by embolization.     

Scalp-recorded short and middle latency peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials in normals: comparison with peroneal and median nerve SEPs in patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions

Peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed on 23 normal subjects and 9 selected patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions involving somatosensory pathways.Recording obtained from right and left peroneal nerve (PN) stimulations were compared in all subjects, using open and restricted frequency bandpass filters. Restricted filter (100–3000 Hz) and linked ear reference (A1–A2) enhanced the detection of short latency potentials (P1, P2, N1 with mean peak latency of 17.72, 21.07, 24.09) recorded from scalp electrodes over primary sensory cortex regions. Patients with lesions in the parietal cortex and adjacent subcortical areas demonstrated low amplitude and poorly formed short latency peroneal potentials, and absence of components beyond P3 peak with mean latency of 28.06 msec. In these patients, recordings to right and left median nerve (MN) stimulation showed absence or distorted components subsequent to N1 (N18) potential.These observations suggest that components subsequent to P3 potential in response to PN stimulation, and subsequent to N18 potential in response to MN stimulation, are generated in the parietal cortical regions.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials: Correlations with height

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were studied in 160 subjects aged 20–90 years. Height was highly correlated with latencies of spinal and cortical SEPs (N13, N20, N22, and P40). Although tibial central conduction (N22-P40) was also highly correlated with height, median conduction (N13–N22) was not correlated with the latter.Multiple correlation and regression analysis showed that except for the median N13–N20 latency, height provided the best prediction of the remaining SEP latencies. Age alone was not correlated with SEP latencies, but its significance was observed when age and height were considered together as the predictors. Effects of age and height on SEP latencies were independent of gender.The present data indicate that except for the N13–N20 conduction, height is the most important parameter for SEP latencies and can be used for construction of normograms.     

The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials

The relative prognostic value of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) was assessed in 35 patients with post-traumatic coma. Analysis of the evoked potentials was restricted to those recorded within the first 4 days following head injury. Abnormal SEPs were defined as an increase in central somatosensory conduction time or an absence of the initial cortical potential following stimulation of either median nerve. Abnormal BAEPs were classified as an increase in the wave I–V interval or the loss of any or all of its 3 most stable components (waves I, III and V) following stimulation of either ear. SEPs reliably both good and bad outcomes. All 17 patients in whom SEPs were graded as normal had a favourable outcome and 15 of 18 patients in whom SEPs were abnormal had an unfavourable outcome. Although abnormal BAEPs were associated with an unfavourable outcome in almost all patients (6 of 7), only 19 of 28 patients with normal BAEPs had a favourable outcome. The finding of normal BAEPs was therefore of little prognostic significance. These results confirm the superiority and greater sensitivity of the SEP in detecting abnormalities of brain function shortly after severe head trauma.     

Direct recording of somatosensory evoked potentials in the vicinity of the dorsal column nuclei in man: their generator mechanisms and contribution to the scalp far-field potentials

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in the vicinity of the dorsal column nuclei in response to electrical stimulation of the median nerve (MN) and posterior tibial nerve (PTN) were studied by analyzing the wave forms, topographical distribution, effects of higher rates of stimulation and correlation with components of the scalp-recorded SEPs. Recordings were done on 4 patients with spasmodic torticollis during neurosurgical operations for microvascular decompression of the eleventh nerve. The dorsal column SEPs to MN stimulation (MN-SEPs) were characterized by a major negative wave (N1; 13 msec in mean latency), preceded by a small positivity (P1) and followed by a large positive wave (P2). Similar wave forms (P1′-N1′-P2′) were obtained with stimulation of PTN (PTN-SEPs), with a mean latency of N1′ being 28 msec. Maximal potentials of MN-SEPs and PTN-SEPs were located in the vicinity of the ipsilateral cuneate and gracile nuclei, respectively, at a level slightly caudal to the nuclei. The latencies of P1 and N1 increased progressively at more rostral cervical cord segments and medulla, but that of P2 did not. A higher rate of stimulation (16 Hz) caused no effects on P1 and N1, while it markedly attenuated the P2 component. These findings suggest that P1 and N1 of MN-SEPs, as well as P1′ and N1′ of PTN-SEPs, are generated by the dorsal column fibers, and P2 and P2′ are possibly of postsynaptic origin in the respective dorsal column nuclei.The peak latency of N1 recorded on the cuneate nucleus was identical with the scalp-recorded far-field potential of P13–14 in all patients, while no scalp components were found which corresponded to P2. These findings support the previous assumption that the scalp-recorded P13–14 is generated by the presynaptic activities of the dorsal column fibers at their terminals in the cuneate nucleus.     

Parameters of somatosensory evoked potentials in normal subjects in relation to age and height

Cortical SEPs by stimulation of median nerve at wrist (159 measurements; 144 subjects, 63 M - 81 F; mean age 39.7, range 11-70; mean height 162.5, range 134-190) and cortical SEPs by stimulation of posterior tibial nerve at ankle (100 measurements; 81 subjects, 37 M - 44 F; mean age 34.7, range 11-60; mean height 161.1, range 134-180 cm) have been performed. The latencies of N1 of median SEPs and of N1 and P1 of tibial SEPs significantly increase with the height of subjects. The statistical evaluation of latency values of each subject normalized at a height of 165 cm show a little increase of latency according to the age of the subjects; this increase is quite evident for the latency of P1 of tibial SEP.     

Clinical and neuroimaging correlates of abnormal short-latency Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in elderly vascular dementia patients: A psychophysiological exploratory study

BACKGROUND: Short Latency Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SEPs) may serve to the testing of the somatosensory tract function, which is vulnerable and affected in vascular encephalopathy. The aim of the current study was to search for clinical and neuroimaging correlates of abnormal SEPs in vascular dementia (VD) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 14 VD patients, aged 72.93 PlusMinus; 4.73 years, and 10 controls aged 71.20 PlusMinus; 4.44 years. All subjects underwent a detailed clinical examination, blood and biochemical testing, brain MRI and were assessed with the MMSE. SEPs were recorded after stimulation from upper and lower limbs. The statistical Analysis included 1 and 2-way MANCOVAs and Factor analysis RESULTS: The N13 latency was significantly prolonged, the N19 amplitude was lower, the P27 amplitude was lower and the N11-P27 conduction time was prolonged in severely demented patients in comparison to controls. The N19 latency was prolonged in severely demented patients in comparison to both mildly demented and controls. The same was true for the N13-N19 conduction time, and for the P27 latency. Patients with subcortical lesions had all their latencies prolonged and lower P27 amplitude. DISCUSSION: The results of the current study suggest that there are significant differences between patients suffering from VD and healthy controls in SEPs, but these are detectable only when dementia is severe or there are lesions located in the subcortical regions. The results of the current study locate the abnormal SEPs in the white matter, and are in accord with the literature.     

Latency and amplitude abnormalities of the scalp far-field P14 to median nerve stimulation in multiple sclerosis. A SEP study of 122 patients recorded with a non-cephalic reference montage

The frequency and characteristics of P14 abnormalities were investigated in 122 patients with probable (68), or definite (54) multiple sclerosis by recording SEPs to median nerve stimulation with a non-cephalic reference montage. The most frequent SEP abnormality found in our series (62% of abnormal results) combined latency increase and amplitude reduction of P14. Interindividual variability, inherent in absolute amplitude measurements, was by-passed by calculating the ration between the amplitudes of far-field P9 and P14 components, which proved to be normally distributed in controls. In spite of the strong association (P ⪡ 0.001) between the P9–P14 interpeak interval (IPL) and the P9/P14 amplitude ratio in MS patients, the latter parameter was found to be the only abnormality in 12 patients whose P9–P14 and P14–N20 IPLs were normal. Also IPLs were increased in 12 patients with normal P14 amplitudes. These results suggest that adding the P9/P14 amplitude criterion to standard IPL data might be useful to detect conduction troubles in MS patients.     

Topography of somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation in patients with cerebral lesions

Scalp distributions and topographies of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation were studied in 22 patients with 5 different types of cerebral lesion due to cerebrovascular disease or tumor (thalamic, postcentral subcortical, precentral subcortical, diffuse subcortical and parieto-occipital lesions) in order to investigate the origins of frontal (P20, N24) and central-parietal SEPs (N20, P22, P23).In 2 patients with thalamic syndrome, N16 was delayed in latency and N20/P20 were not recorded. No early SEP except for N16 was recorded in 2 patients with pure hemisensory loss due to postcentral subcortical lesion. In all 11 patients with pure hemiparesis or hemiplegia due to precentral subcortical lesion N20/P20 and P22, P23/N24 components were of normal peak latencies. The amplitude of N24 was significantly decreased in all 3 patients with complete hemiplegia. These findings support the hypothesis that N20/P20 are generated as a horizontal dipole in the central sulcus (3b), whereas P23/N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and post-rolandic fissures. P22 was very localized in the central area contralateral to the stimulation.Topographical studies of early cortical SEPs are useful for detecting each component in abnormal SEPs     

Abnormalities of parietal and prerolandic somatosensory evoked potentials in Huntington's disease

Cervical, parietal and prerolandic somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation at the wrist were recorded with an earlobe reference in 24 patients with Huntington's disease (HD) and in 24 age-matched normal controls. Cortical responses of abnormal wave form and reduced amplitude were constantly observed in HD patients. SEP changes affected more severely the prerolandic (P22/N30) pattern, which could not be recognized in two-thirds of patients, than the parietal (N20/P27) pattern, which could be identified in all cases. The N20 latency and the central conduction time (N13–N20 interval) were significantly increased. The occurrence of abnormalities of central conduction and of a predominant involvement of the prerolandic SEP pattern suggests an impairment of impulse transmission along the somatosensory lemniscal pathway at subcortical, possibly thalamic, level in HD.     

Correlation of tibial nerve SEPs with the development of seizures in patients with supratentorial cerebral infarcts

In 40 patients with supratentorial non-haemorrhagic cerebral infarct, the findings in the tibial nerve SEPs recorded during the acute stage correlated significantly with the development of seizures during a 1 year follow-up period. Abnormality in the side-to-side difference of the P40-N48 amplitude was the finding with the highest correlation with the development of seizures: 87.5% of the patients were classified correctly as to the risk of seizures.     

SEPs to median nerve stimulation: normative data for paediatrics

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) provide neurologists with an assessment of the neuraxis from peripheral nerve to sensory cortex. Their value is particularly relevant in paediatric neurology as sensory clinical examination can be difficult in young infants and children. The clinical utility of SEPs, however, requires knowledge of the alterations in wave form which occur with growth and development. This study presents normative SEP data from 4 months-35 years. Different non-linear maturational patterns were seen in spinal and central segments of the nervous system. The cervical components (N12, N13) changed little in latency until 2–3 years, the N20 decreased in latency until 2–3 years and P22 decreased in latency until 6–8 years, after which latencies increased until adulthood. The greatest latency changes occurred in N12 and N13, the least in N20. Wave from morphology and interpeak latencies also changed with age. Adult morphology was achieved early (from 1 year), but central conduction time (N13–N20) reached adult values only at 6–8 years. This study provides normative values of SEPs during maturation and a functional assessment of pathways known to myelinate and mature at varying rates.     

Peri-rolandic and fronto-parietal components of scalp-recorded giant SEPs in cortical myoclonus

Scalp topography of giant SEPs to median nerve stimulation was studied in 4 patients with cortical myoclonus of various etiology. The positive peak (P30) at the contralateral parietal area was simultaneously accompanied by a negative peak at the frontal area (N30), and at least one of these two peaks was enhanced in 2 patients. Another positive peak (P25) and a negative peak (N35) were also identified at the peri-rolandic area with different latency from P30 and N30, respectively, in all patients. N35 was enhanced in 3 patients, and P25 in 2 patients. It is concluded that, as seen in normal subjects, tangential (P30-N30) and radial (P25 and N35) components of SEPs are most likely distinguishable in giant SEPs, and that either one or both of those components is enhanced in different ways depending on the patients.     

Recovery after surgery of the spinal N24 SEP in dural arteriovenous malformation of the dorsal cord

We studied somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to tibial nerve stimulation in two patients suffering from dorsal dural arteriovenous malformation (AVM). We found in both patients abnormalities in the lumbar N24 potential and in the cortical P40 response. After surgical removal of the AVM, the N24 recovered in both patients. Cord lesions probably occur in patients with dural AVM because of a theft of blood through the fistula; N24 recovery may therefore be associated with a restoration of blood supply after surgery. The N24 recovery in our patients with dural AVM suggests that the abnormality of this potential does not necessarily reflect irreversible damage to the Jumbo-sacral cord and that the N24 recording can be useful in post-surgical monitoring.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by dorsal penile and posterior tibial nerve stimulation

SEPs were elicited by stimulation of the dorsal penile nerve (DPN) or posterior tibial nerve (PTN) under 3 conditions of stimulation: random and constant interstimulus intervals, and subject-initiated stimulation. Within these conditions, the effects of repeated stimulation were also examined. The latency of the N90 peak decreased with repeated stimulation. N90 amplitude decreased with increased foreknowledge as well as with repeated stimulation. Factors extracted by principal components analysis revealed similar effects. A difference between DPN and PTN stimulation was seen in a factor associated with the N90 peak, wherein the condition involving subject self-initiation of the stimulus reflected a significantly greater decrease in SEP amplitude when the DPN was stimulated. Morphological commonalities were observed in the SEPs elicited by DPN and PTN for a given subject.     

Median and tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: middle-latency components from the vicinity of the secondary somatosensory cortex in humans

The topography of the middle-latency N110 after radial nerve stimulation suggested a generator in SII. To support this hypothesis, we have tried to identify a homologous component in the tibial nerve SEP (somatosensory evoked potential). Evoked potentials following tibial nerve stimulation (motor+sensory threshold) were recorded with 29 electrodes (bandpass 0.5–500 Hz, sampling rate 1000 Hz). For comparison, the median nerve was stimulated at the wrist. Components were identified as peaks in the global field power (GFP). Map series were generated around GFP peaks and amplitudes were measured from electrodes near map maxima. With median nerve stimulation, we recorded a negativity with a maximum in temporal electrode positions and 106±12 ms peak latency (mean±SD), comparable to the N110 following radial nerve stimulation. After tibial nerve stimulation the latency of a component with the same topography was 131±11 ms (N130). Both N110 and N130 were present ipsi- as well as contralaterally. Amplitudes were significantly higher on the contralateral than the ipsilateral scalp for both median (3.1±2.4 μV vs. 1.7±1.6 μV) and tibial nerve (1.9±1.2 μV vs. 0.6+1 μV). The topography of the N130 can be explained by a generator in the vicinity of SII. The latency difference between median and tibial nerve stimulation is related to the longer conduction distance (cf. N20 and P40). The smaller ipsilateral N130 is consistent with the bilateral body representation in SII.