Selectivity of attenuation (i.e., gating) of somatosensory potentials during voluntary movement in humans

Attenuation of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPS) recorded from the scalp during voluntary movement occurs for specific combinations of the finger moved and the peripheral nerve stimulated. The cerebral potential component occurring at a latency of 27 msec (P27) evoked either by stimulation of median nerve at the wrist or by stimulation of 1st and 2nd digit nerves in the fingers were selectively attenuated during movement of 1st digit but were not altered during movement of 5th digit. By contrast, the cerebral P27 component evoked by stimulation of ulnar nerve at the wrist or by stimulation of 5th digital nerve were attenuated during movement of that digit but were not altered during movement of 1st digit. Gating of somatosensory activity is a selective phenomenon occuring when movement involves the areas being stimulated.     

Dermatomal and mixed nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of dermatomal and mixed nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and to compare their value with routine electrodiagnostic methods, we studied a group of 44 patients with neurogenic TOS and 30 healthy controls. In addition to bilateral median and ulnar SEPs, evoked potentials were recorded after stimulation of C6 and C8 dermatomes from the first and fifth digits, respectively. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to the nature of their clinical condition. The abnormality rate for both ulnar and C8 dermatomal SEPs was 100% in a small group of patients with severe neurological signs like atrophy. In groups of patients with lesser degrees of neurogenic damage, abnormality rates for ulnar and C8 dermatomal SEPs on affected limb(s) were 67 and 50%, respectively. Same abnormality rates were 25 and 18% in patients with only subjective symptoms. In patients with objective neurological signs, the major increase in sensitivity was with electromyography (EMG). Abnormalities of routine nerve conduction studies and F-wave latency were observed in patients with severe neurogenic damage. We concluded that the most useful tests in the diagnosis of neurogenic TOS are needle EMG and ulnar SEPs.     

Right or left ear reference changes the voltage of frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials

Short-latency cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to left median nerve stimulation were recorded with either the left or right earlobe as reference. With a right earlobe reference the voltage of the parietal N20 and P27 was reduced while the voltage of the frontal P20 and N30 was enhanced. The effects were consistent, but their size varied with the SEP component considered and also among the subjects. Analysis of SEPs at different scalp sites and at either earlobe suggested that the ear contralateral to the side stimulated picked up transient potential differences, depending a.o. on side asymmetry and geometry of the neural generators as disclosed in topographic mapping. For example, the right ear potential can be shifted negatively by the right N20 field evoked by left median nerve stimulation. The changes involve the absolute potential values, but not the time features of the gradients of potential fields. Scalp current density (SCD) maps are not affected. The results are pertinent for current discussions about which reference to use and document the practical recommendation of recording short-latency cortical SEPs with a reference at the ear ipsilateral (not contralateral) to the side of stimulation.     

Electric and CO2 laser SEPs in a patient with asymptomatic syringomyelia

We recorded electrically stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials (electric SEPs) and pain-related SEPs following CO₂ laser stimulation (CO₂ laser SEPs) from a 17-year-old patient affected by myotonic dystrophy whose MRI disclosed a large syrinx extending from spinal level C2 to S3. Careful clinical and electromyographic examinations revealed no motor or sensory disturbances, apart from myotonia. The only abnormality noted in median and ulnar nerve short-latency electric SEPs (recorded with a non-cephalic reference electrode) was the absence of cervical component N13, the other SEP responses (N9, N10, N11, P14, N20) being normal. The cutaneous pain threshold and CO₂ laser SEPs (both obtained by a CO₂ laser beam applied to the back of the hand) were normal. Thus cervical component N13 appears to be highly sensitive to the effects of central cord lesions, even when these are asymptomatic.     

Nerve,spinal cord and brain somatosensory evoked responses: a comparative study during electrical and magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and compound nerve action potentials (cNAPs) have been recorded in 15 subjects during electrical and magnetic nerve stimulation. Peripheral records were gathered at Erb's point and on nerve trunks at the elbow during median and ulnar nerve stimulation at the wrist. Erb responses to electrical stimulation were larger in amplitude and shorter in duration than the magnetic ones when ‘electrical’ and ‘magnetic’ compound muscle action potentials (cMAPs) of comparable amplitudes were elicited. SEPs were recorded respectively at Cv7 and on the somatosensory scalp areas contra- and ipsilateral to the stimulated side. SEPs showed a statistically significant difference in amplitude only for the brachial plexus response and for the ‘cortical’ N20-P25 complex; differences were not found between the magnetic and electrical central conduction times (CCTs) or for the peripheral nerve response latencies. Magnetic stimulation preferentially excited the motor and proprioceptive fibres when the nerve trunks were stimulated at motor threshold intensities.     

Cortical potentials evoked by epidural stimulation of the cervical and thoracic spinal cord in man

Scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded after electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in humans. Stimulating electrodes were placed at different vertebral levels of the epidural space over the midline of the posterior aspect of the spinal cord. The wave form of the response differed according to the level of the stimulating epidural electrodes. Cervical stimulation elicited an SEP very similar to that produced by stimulation of upper extremity nerves, e.g., bilateral median nerve SEP, but with a shorter latency. Epidural stimulation of the lower thoracic cord elicited an SEP similar to that produced by stimulation of lower extremity nerves. The results of upper thoracic stimulation appeared as a mixed upper and lower extremity type of SEP. The overall amplitudes of SEPs elicited by the epidural stimulation were higher than SEPs elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation. In 4 patients the CV along the spinal cord was calculated from the difference in latencies of the cortical responses to stimulation at two different vertebral levels. The CVs were in the range of 45–65 m/sec. The method was shown to be promising for future study of spinal cord dysfunctions.     

Recovery functions of somatosensory vertex potentials in man: interaction of evoked responses from right and left fingers

Somatosensory vertex potentials (SVPs) were examined in 12 healthy subjects in response to painful electrical stimulation of the finger. SVPs consisted of N1, P1, and N2. The average latencies of the 3 peaks were 150, 225, and 350 msec, respectively. The latency and amplitude of each potential were reproducible for each subject. Recovery functions of the SVPs were analyzed in 10 subjects. A pair of stimuli were delivered to the right or left finger with interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 50, 100, 150, 200, 350, 500 and 650 msec. SVPs partially recovered with the shortest ISI (50 msec). Full recovery could not be obtained even with the longest ISI (650 msec). Differences in recoveries within 650 msec of ISI were not observed between right and left stimulations. To examine the interaction between SVPs evoked by right and left finger stimulation, recovery functions from prior contralateral finger stimulation were analyzed with the same ISIs. SVP recoveries for right after left or left after right patterns of stimulus delivery were nearly the same as those for ipsilateral ones. It is suggested that SVPs are generated at nearly the same site in the sensory pathway regardless of the side stimulated.     

Somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex as studied in scalp EEG

We recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in scalp EEGs during stimulation of the median nerve, the ulnar nerve and the individual digits in 3 normal subjects and in 1 epilepsy patients. In this patient we also measured SEPs from chronically indwelling subdural grid electrodes during electrocorticography (ECoG). We applied dipole modelling techniques to study the 3-dimensional intracerebral locations and time activities of the neuronal sources underlying stimulation of different peripheral receptive fields. The sources underlying median nerve SEPs were located an average of 10.8 mm lateral inferior to those underlying ulnar nerve SEPs. Digit SEP sources showed a somatotopic arrangement from lateral inferior to medial superior in the order thumb, index finger, middle finger, ring finger and little finger, with some overlap or reversal for adjacent digits. The average distance between thumb and little finger was 12.5 mm. Thumb, index finger and middle finger were clustered around median nerve cortical representation, whereas ring finger and little finger were arranged around ulnar nerve cortex. In the epilepsy patient, the source localizations obtained in scalp EEGs showed good agreement with those on ECoGs. We conclude that SEPs recorded in scalp EEGs can be used to study functional topography of human somatosensory cortex non-invasively.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials after removal of somatosensory cortex in man

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve, ulnar nerve, thumb, middle finger, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were recorded in a patient with a discrete resection of part of the postcentral somatosensory cortex as a treatment for focal epilepsy. Comparison of the different stimulation sites confirmed electrophysiologically the restricted locus of the lesion. The results strongly suggest that the early negative component (N20) and subsequent components recorded postcentrally are of cortical origin and depend upon postcentral gyrus cytoarchitectonic areas 3, 2, and 1. Moreover, these postcentral SEPs are distinct from precentrally recorded activity.     

Neurophysiological evaluation of central-peripheral sensory and motor pudendal fibres

Extensive neurophysiological investigations were carried out in 18 healthy volunteer subjects, and 6 patients with neurological disease. The tests consisted of spinal and scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to stimulation of the dorsal nerve of penis/clitoris, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the bulbocavernosus muscle (BC) and anal sphincter (AS) in response to scalp and sacral root stimulation, and measurement of sacral reflex latency (SRL) from BC and AS.In the control subjects, the mean sensory total conduction time (sensory TCT), as measured at the peak of the scalp P40 wave was 40.9 msec (range: 37.8–44.2). The mean sensory central conduction time (sensory CCT = spine-to-scalp conduction time) was 27.0 msec (range: 23.5–30.4).Transcranial brain stimulation was performed by using a magnetic stimulator both at rest and during voluntary contraction of the examined muscle. Sacral root stimulation was performed at rest. Motor total conduction times (motor TCT) to BC and AS muscles were respectively 28.8 and 30.0 msec at rest, and 22.5 and 22.8 msec during contraction. Motor central conduction times (motor CCT) to sacral cord segments controlling BC and AS muscles were respectively 22.4 and 21.2 msec at rest, and 15.1 and 12.4 msec during contraction.The mean latencies of SRL were respectively 31.4 msec in the bulbocavernosus muscle and 35.9 msec in the anal sphincter. Combined or isolated abnormalities of SEPs, MEPs and SRL were found in a small group of patients with neurological disorders primarily or secondarily affecting the genito-urinary tract.     

Scalp-recorded short and middle latency peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials in normals: comparison with peroneal and median nerve SEPs in patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions

Peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed on 23 normal subjects and 9 selected patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions involving somatosensory pathways.Recording obtained from right and left peroneal nerve (PN) stimulations were compared in all subjects, using open and restricted frequency bandpass filters. Restricted filter (100–3000 Hz) and linked ear reference (A1–A2) enhanced the detection of short latency potentials (P1, P2, N1 with mean peak latency of 17.72, 21.07, 24.09) recorded from scalp electrodes over primary sensory cortex regions. Patients with lesions in the parietal cortex and adjacent subcortical areas demonstrated low amplitude and poorly formed short latency peroneal potentials, and absence of components beyond P3 peak with mean latency of 28.06 msec. In these patients, recordings to right and left median nerve (MN) stimulation showed absence or distorted components subsequent to N1 (N18) potential.These observations suggest that components subsequent to P3 potential in response to PN stimulation, and subsequent to N18 potential in response to MN stimulation, are generated in the parietal cortical regions.     

New techniques in female pudendal somatosensory evoked potential testing

OBJECTIVE: The primary nerves innervating the female genitalia are the dorsal nerve of the clitoris (DNC) and the perineal nerve, which innervate the clitoris and the external genitalia/distal vagina, respectively. We describe two novel electrodiagnostic techniques for evaluating the integrity of these female genital somatosensory pathways. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven healthy women (mean age 29.3 years) were enrolled for this study. We performed DNC somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), stimulating through self-adhesive disk electrodes on either side of the clitoris. Perineal nerve SEPs were evoked through a vaginal probe. Cortical responses were measured through cup electrodes affixed to the scalp at Cpz and Fpz. Stimulus parameters were duration 0.1 ms, frequency 4.1 Hz, filters 5-5,000 Hz, at three times sensory threshold. RESULTS: DNC and perineal nerve SEPs from both the right and left sides were reproducible and easily discerned. The mean P1 latencies were: right DNC 39.4 ms (SD 2.8 ms), left DNC 39.3 ms (SD 3.3 ms), right perineal nerve 37.8 ms (SD 3.4 ms), left perineal nerve 37.6 ms (SD 3.1 ms). We recorded SEP responses from 90 to 92% of subjects for the DNC, and 69% for the perineal nerve. CONCLUSIONS: We are able to evoke somatosensory potentials from the four primary somatic nerves that mediate female genital cutaneous sensation. In healthy subjects, the DNC responses are robust and maintain laterality. The perineal nerve responses are less consistently obtained, but when recorded, are easily discerned. These preliminary data provide a foundation from which to study female genital innervation, particularly as it applies to sexual function.     

Ipsilateral median somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from human somatosensory cortex

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to ipsilateral and contralateral median nerve stimulations were recorded from subdural electrode grids over the perirolandic areas in 41 patients with medically refractory focal epilepsies who underwent evaluation for epilepsy surgery. All patients showed clearly defined, high-amplitude contralateral median SEPs. In addition, four patients showed ipsilateral SEPs. Compared with the contralateral SEPs, ipsilateral SEPs were very localized, had a different spatial distribution, were of considerably lower amplitude, had a longer latency (1.2–17.8 ms), did not show an initial negativity, and were markedly attenuated during sleep. Stimulation of the subdural electrodes overlying the sensory hand area was associated with contralateral hand paresthesias, but no ipsilateral hand paresthesias occurred. It was concluded that subdurally recorded cortical SEPs to ipsilateral stimulation of the median nerve (M) reflect unconscious sensory input from the hand possibly serving fast bimanual hand control. The anatomical pathway of these ipsilateral short-latency MSEPs is not yet known. Transcallosal transmission seems unlikely because of the short delay between the ipsilateral and contralateral responses in selected cases. The infrequent occurrence of ipsilateral subdurally recorded SEPs and their low amplitude and limited distribution suggest that they contribute very little to the short-latency ipsilateral median SEPs recorded on the scalp.     

The feasibility of detecting motor and sensory potentials in a sheep model

To investigate the characteristics of motor, sensory and sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) of thoracic and lumbar roots, and demonstrate the feasibility of assessing axonal regrowth after the neurotization procedure in a sheep model. Six adult sheep were anaesthetized and placed in a sternal position. The thoracic and lumbar roots from T11 to L5 were identified at their emergence from the vertebral foramen and stimulated. Motor and sensory responses were monitored. Thoracic and lumbar roots were easily identified in all cases. Motor potentials were detected for each stimulated nerve without difficulty. The amplitudes were quite variable, ranging from 100 to 5300 microV. Sensory and SEPs were satisfactorily recorded in only three of the six animals. Sensory amplitudes also varied greatly, ranging from 25 to 120 microV. In three cases, SEPs could not be identified due to motor artefacts. The motor pathway after axonal regrowth in neurotized lumbar roots might easily be explored by proximal electric stimulation of the root, close to the sutured area. Detection of sensory and spinal cord evoked potentials might be improved by the use of curve summation techniques. Specific axonal tracing holds promise of being a useful technique for examining sensory and motor pathway recovery after neurotization in the sheep model.     

Maps of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to mechanical (tapping) stimuli: comparison with P14, N20, P22, N30 of electrically elicited SEPs

Bit mapped color imaging of SEPs was recorded from 19 derivations in 11 healthy volunteers after electrical stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist, index finger digital nerve stimulation, and mechanical stimulation of the index fingertips by an electromechanically driven vibrating thin metallic plate. The latencies of SEP components increased for the various stimulation modalities, being shortestafter median nerve stimulation at the wrist and longest after mechanical stimulation of the index fingertips.The scalp distribution of SEPs to mechanical stimuli was, however, the same as other SEPs, independently of the stimulation employed, and components corresponding to N20 and P22 were recorded only contralaterally to the stimulated side.     

Mapping somatosensory evoked potentials to finger stimulation at intervals of 450 to 4000 msec and the issue of habituation when assessing early cognitive components

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to mild electric stimulation of two fingers of the left hand were studied at regular interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 450, 800, 1400, 2500 and 4000 msec. Habituation was evaluated while the subject was reading a novel so as to virtually ignore the finger stimuli while maintaining steady vigilance levels. Brain SEPs recorded from 25 scalp electrodes were assessed by scatter displays, electronic subtraction, bit-mapped potentials fields, and by calculating theZ estimator and dilation factor. Similar results were obtained with randomly varying ISIs. The P14 farfield and cortical N20 did not change with ISIs. The parietal P27–P45 decreased at ISIs of 800 and 450 msec, but showed no significant habituation at ISIs of 1400, 2500 or 4000 msec. This validated the control conditions used for assessing the early cognitive P30 and P40 to attended target stimuli. The frontal N30 also decremented at the shorter ISIs but still habituated up to ISIs of 2500 msec. The clear dissociation between frontal N30 and parietal P27 at the larger ISIs suggests that they involve at least in part distinct neural generators.     

New techniques in female pudendal somatosensory evoked potential testing

Objective—The primary nerves innervating the female genitalia are the dorsal nerve of the clitoris (DNC) and the perineal nerve, which innervate the clitoris and the external genitalia/distal vagina, respectively. We describe two novel electrodiagnostic techniques for evaluating the integrity of these female genital somatosensory pathways.

Subjects and methods—Seventy-seven healthy women (mean age 29.3 years) were enrolled for this study. We performed DNC somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), stimulating through self-adhesive disk electrodes on either side of the clitoris. Perineal nerve SEPs were evoked through a vaginal probe. Cortical responses were measured through cup electrodes affixed to the scalp at Cpz and Fpz. Stimulus parameters were duration 0.1?ms, frequency 4.1?Hz, filters 5–5,000?Hz, at three times sensory threshold.

Results—DNC and perineal nerve SEPs from both the right and left sides were reproducible and easily discerned. The mean P1 latencies were: right DNC 39.4?ms (SD 2.8?ms), left DNC 39.3?ms (SD 3.3?ms), right perineal nerve 37.8?ms (SD 3.4?ms), left perineal nerve 37.6?ms (SD 3.1?ms). We recorded SEP responses from 90 to 92% of subjects for the DNC, and 69% for the perineal nerve.

Conclusions—We are able to evoke somatosensory potentials from the four primary somatic nerves that mediate female genital cutaneous sensation. In healthy subjects, the DNC responses are robust and maintain laterality. The perineal nerve responses are less consistently obtained, but when recorded, are easily discerned. These preliminary data provide a foundation from which to study female genital innervation, particularly as it applies to sexual function.     

The value of ulnar somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in cervical myelopathy

In 57 patients with clinical signs and surgical documentation of compressive myelopathy, ulnar nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were more sensitive (with 74% abnormal) than either median or tibial nerve SEPs. The most frequent abnormalities were reduced or absent neck evoked responses and prolonged central conduction time. All subjects who had an SEP abnormality were identified by combined tibial and ulnar SEPs. Median nerve SEP added no additional information. Normal ulnar and tibial nerve SEPs were also able to exclude major cord damage in patients with cervical radiculopathy but little evidence of myelopathy.     

Lateralized memory storage and crossed inhibition during odor processing by Limax

After odor conditioning intact Limax maximus and injecting LY into their haemocoel, labeled groups of neurons are found in either the right or left procerebral lobe but never in both procerebral lobes. This suggests that a competitive interaction occurs between right and left odor processing pathways of which the procerebral lobe is a part. We use the nerve discharge in the external peritentacular nerve evoked by applying a puff of conditioned odor to the nose to document crossed inhibition between left and right odor processing pathways. Responses in the external peritentacular nerve evoked by stimulating one superior nose with a conditioned odor are strongly lateralized as responses occur only on the stimulated side. Stimulating both superior noses simultaneously with the same conditioned odor yields responses in both external peritentacular nerves that resemble the sum of responses to unilateral stimulation. Simultaneously stimulating both superior noses, each with a different conditioned odor, leads to strong inhibition of both external peritentacular nerve responses. The crossed inhibition is also evident if both superior and inferior noses on the same side are stimulated simultaneously. A lateral inhibitory mechanism, situated postsynaptic to odor recognition, appears to inhibit external peritentacular nerve responses if the two noses receive conflicting sensory inputs. Accepted: 14 December 1999     

Two distinct cervical N13 potentials are evoked by ulnar nerve stimulation

To investigate the dual nature of the posterior neck N13 potential, we attempted to establish the presence of a latency dissociation between caudal (cN13) and rostral (rN13) potentials on stimulating the ulnar nerve, in view of its lower radicular entry compared to the median nerve. SEPs were evaluated in 24 normal subjects after both median and ulnar nerve stimulation. cN13 was prominent in the lower cervical segments, and rN13 was localized mainly in the upper ones using anteroposterior and longitudinal bipolar montage, respectively. The N9-cN13 interpeak latency did not differ significantly from N9-rN13 when stimulating the median nerve. On the other hand, the N9-rN13 interpeak was significantly longer than the N9-cN13 interpeak when the ulnar nerve was stimulated. The rN13 presented the same latency as P13-P14 far-field potentials in 17 out of 24 ulnar nerves tested. Therefore, the ulnar nerve stimulation evokes two distinct posterior neck N13 potentials. It is widely accepted that the caudal N13 is a postsynaptic potential reflecting the activity of the dorsal horn interneurons in the lower cervical cord. We suggest that the rostral N13 is probably generated close to the cuneate nucleus, which partly contributes to the genesis of P13-P14 far-field potentials.