Splenogonadal Fusion: An Unusual Case of an Acute Scrotum

We highlight a case on a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophilic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion. Splenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rather rare entity, with approximately 184 cases reported in the literature. The most comprehensive review was that of 123 cases completed by Carragher in 1990. Since then, an additional 61 cases have been reported in the scientific literature. We have studied these 61 cases in detail and have included a summary of that information here.Key words: Splenogonadal fusion, Acute scrotumA 10-year-old boy presented with worsening left-sided scrotal pain of 12 hours’ duration. The patient reported similar previous episodes occurring intermittently over the past several months. His past medical history was significant for left hip dysplasia, requiring multiple hip surgeries. On examination, he was found to have an edematous left hemiscrotum with a left testicle that was rigid, tender, and noted to be in a transverse lie. The ultrasound revealed possible polyorchism, with two testicles on the left and one on the right (Figure 1), and left epididymitis. One of the left testicles demonstrated a loss of blood flow consistent with testicular torsion (Figure 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Ultrasound of the left hemiscrotum reveals two spherical structures; the one on the left is heterogeneous and hyperdense in comparison to the right.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Doppler ultrasound of left hemiscrotum. No evidence of blood flow to left spherical structure.The patient was taken to the operating room for immediate scrotal exploration. A normalappearing left testicle with a normal epididymis was noted. However, two accessory structures were noted, one of which was torsed 720°; (Figure 3). An inguinal incision was then made and a third accessory structure was noted. All three structures were connected with fibrous tissue, giving a “rosary bead” appearance. The left accessory structures were removed, a left testicular biopsy was taken, and bilateral scrotal orchipexies were performed.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Torsed accessory spleen with splenogonadal fusion.Pathology revealed a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophillic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion (Figure 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4Splenogonadal fusion, continuous type with three accessory structures.     

Triple X Egyptian woman and a Down's syndrome offspring

The 47, XXX karyotype (triple X) has a frequency of 1 in 1000 female newborns. However, this karyotype is not usually suspected at birth or childhood. Female patients with a sex chromosome abnormality may be fertile. In patients with a 47, XXX cell line there appears to be an increased risk of a cytogenetically abnormal child but the extent of this risk cannot yet be determined; it is probably lower in the non-mosaic 47, XXX patient than the mosaic 46, XX/47, XXX one. We describe a new rare case of triple X woman and a Down''s syndrome offspring. The patient is 26 years of age. She is a housewife, her height is 160 cm and weight is 68 kg and her physical features and mentality are normal. She has had one pregnancy at the age of 25 years resulted in a girl with Down''s syndrome. The child had 47 chromosomes with trisomy 21 (47, XX, +21) Figure 1. The patient also has 47 chromosomes with a triple X karyotype (47, XX, +X) Figure 2. The patient''s husband (27 years old) is physically and mentally normal. He has 46 chromosomes with a normal XY karyotype (46, XY). There are neither Consanguinity between her parent''s nor she and her husband.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Karyotype 47, XX + 21 of the daughter of Triple X syndromeOpen in a separate windowFigure 2Karyptype 47, XX + X of the Down syndrome''s mother     

Diversity in spindle morphology in Arabidopsis root tip

A primary function of the spindle apparatus is to segregate chromosomes into two equal sets in a dividing cell. It is unclear whether spindles in different cell types play additional roles in cellular regulation. As a first step in revealing new functions of spindles, we investigated spindle morphology in different cell types in Arabidopsis roots in the wild-type and the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant backgrounds. cyd1 provides cells larger than those of the wild type for testing the cell size effect on spindle morphology. Our observations indicate that cell type (shape), not cell size, is likely a factor affecting spindle morphology. At least three spindle types were observed, including small spindles with pointed poles in narrow cells, large barrel-shaped spindles (without pointed poles) in wide cells, and spindles intermediate in pole focus and size in other cells. We hypothesize that the cell-type-associated spindle diversity may be an integral part of the cell differentiation processes.Key words: spindle pole, microtubule, morphogenesis, cell type, metaphaseThe cellular apparatus for chromosome segregation during mitosis is typically described as a spindle composed of microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins. Research on the structure and function of the spindle is usually conducted under the assumption that spindles are structurally the same or alike in different cell types in an organism. If the assumption is true, it would indicate that either the intracellular conditions in different dividing cells are very similar or the assembly and maintenance of the spindle are insensitive to otherwise variable intracellular conditions. But experimental evidence related to this assumption is relatively sparse.The root tip in Arabidopsis, as in other higher plants, contains dividing cells of different shapes and sizes. These cells include both meristem initial and derivative cells, with the former and latter being proximal and distal to the quiescent center, respectively.¹ The diversity in dividing cells in the root tip provides an opportunity for testing whether the spindles also exhibit diversity in morphology. To visualize the spindles at the metaphase stage in the root tip cells, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence labeling of the β-tubulin in single cells prepared from wild-type Arabidopsis (in Col-0 background) root tips as previously described in references ² and ³. The spindles in cells of different morphologies were then observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope.³ Three types of spindle were detected. The first type (Fig. 1A) was the smallest in width and length and had the most-pointed poles among the three types. The second type (Fig. 1B) was wider and longer than the first type but with less-pointed poles than the first type. The third type (Fig. 1C) was similar in height to the second type but lacked the pointed poles. In fact, the third type is shaped more like a barrel than a spindle. The first type was found in cells narrow in the direction parallel to the equatorial plane of the spindle, a situation opposite to that of the third type whose cells were wide in the equatorial direction. The wide cells containing the barrel-shaped spindles likely belonged to the epidermal layer in the root tip.¹ The second type was found in cells intermediate in width. Examples of metaphase spindles morphologically resembling the three types of spindles in Arabidopsis root can also be found in a previous report by Xu et al. even although spindle diversity was not the subject of the report.⁴ In Xu et al.''s report, type 1- or 2-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 2B and 3A, and type 3-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 1A and 3B. These observations indicate that at least three types of spindles exist in the root cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Spindles in wild-type root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. (B) Type-2 spindle. (C) Type-3 spindle. The spots without fluorescence signals in the middle of the spindles are where the chromosomes were located. Scale bar for all the figures = 20 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Spindles in cyd1 root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. Arrows indicate the upper and lower boundaries of the cell. (B and C) Two type-2 spindles. (D and E) Two type-3 spindles. (F) DAPI-staining image corresponding to (E), showing chromosomes at the equatorial plane. Scale bar for the images = 20 µm.The above observations suggest that either the cell size or the cell type (shape) might be a factor in the type of spindle found in a specific cell. To further investigate the relationship between cell morphology and spindle morphology, we studied metaphase spindles in root cells of the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant.⁵ Because the root cells in cyd1 were larger than corresponding cells in the wild type, presumably due to abnormal polyploidization prior to the collection of the root cells,^5,6 this investigation might reveal a relationship between increasing cell size and altered spindle morphology. A pattern of different spindle types in different cell types similar to that in the wild type was observed in cyd1 (Fig. 2). Figures 2A–C show narrow cells that contained spindles with pointed poles even though the spindles differed in size and focus. Figure 2D shows a barrel-shaped spindle in a wide cell, resembling Figure 1C in overall appearance. The large number of chromosomes at metaphase (more than the diploid number of 10) in Figure 2F indicates that the cells in Figure 2 were polyploid. These figures thus demonstrate that the enlargement in cell size did not alter the pattern of types 1 and 2 spindles in narrow cells, as well as type 3 spindles in wide cells. Moreover, the edges of the spindles in Figure 2B and E were similarly distanced to the cell walls in the equatorial plane, and yet they differ greatly in shape with the former being type 2 and the latter being type 3. This finding argues against that the cell width in the equatorial direction dictates the spindle shape. On the other hand, the cells in Figure 2B and E are obviously of different types. Taken together, these observations suggest that the spindle diversity in both wild type and cyd1 is associated with cell-type diversity.It is unclear whether the different spindle types have different functions in their respective cell types, in addition to the usual role for chromosome segregation. One possibility is that, at the ensuing telophase, the pointed spindles result in compact chromosomal congregation at the poles whereas the barrel-shaped spindles result in loose chromosomal congregation at the poles, which in turn may differentially affect the shape of the subsequently formed daughter nuclei and their organization. Different nuclear shape and organization are likely to be integrated into the processes that confer cell differentiation.     

A Large Number of Reviews on Physician Rating Websites May Reflect Reputation Management

BackgroundPhysicians with a large number of reviews and a high rating may be employing reputation management strategies. Specialists may be more likely than non-specialists to employ such strategies. This should be apparent in a study of online physician reviews on physician rating websites (PRW).MethodsUsing one physician rating website, we gathered orthopedic surgeon and family physician reviews. We measured Spearman correlations between the number of reviews and average numerical rating and used chi-squared to test threshold relationships.ResultsThere were very small negative Spear-man correlations between the number of online reviews and the average numerical rating for orthopedic surgeons (p= -0.097, p-value=<0.001) family medicine physicians (p= -0.170, p-value=<0.001; Figure 2). Physicians with more than 100 reviews had a greater average numerical rating than physicians with fewer than 50 reviews. Orthopedic surgeons are more likely than family medicine physicians to have a large number of reviews and average numerical rating greater than 3.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Family medicine physicians average rating plotted against number of reviews.ConclusionThe small fraction of physician with a high number of reviews may be utilizing reputation management strategies, and this seems relatively specific to specialists rather than non-specialists. Level of Evidence: III     

Conserved residues in the ankyrin domain of VAPYRIN indicate potential protein-protein interaction surfaces

Plant VAPYRINs are required for the establishment of arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) and root nodule symbiosis (RNS). In vapyrin mutants, the intracellular accommodation of AM fungi and rhizobia is blocked, and in the case of AM, the fungal endosymbiont cannot develop arbuscules which serve for nutrient exchange. VAPYRINs are plant-specific proteins that consists of a major sperm protein (MSP) domain and an ankyrin domain. Comparison of VAPYRINs of dicots, monocots and the moss Physcomitrella patens reveals a highly conserved domain structure. We focused our attention on the ankyrin domain, which closely resembles the D34 domain of human ankyrin R. Conserved residues within the petunia VAPYRIN cluster to a surface patch on the concave side of the crescent-shaped ankyrin domain, suggesting that this region may represent a conserved binding site involved in the formation of a protein complex with an essential function in intracellular accommodation of microbial endosymbionts.Key words: VAPYRIN, arbuscular mycorrhiza, petunia, symbiosis, glomus, ankyrin, major sperm protein, VAPPlants engage in mutualistic interactions such as root nodule symbiosis (RNS) with rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) with Glomeromycotan fungi. These associations are referred to as endosymbioses because they involve transcellular passage through the epidermis and intracellular accommodation of the microbial partner within root cortical cells of the host.^1,2 Infection by AM fungi and rhizobia is actively promoted by the plant and requires the establishment of infection structures namely the prepenetration apparatus (PPA) in AM and a preinfection thread in RNS, respectively.^3–5 In both symbioses the intracellular microbial accommodation in epidermal and root cortical cells involves rebuilding of the cytoskeleton and of the entire membrane system.^6–8 Recently, intracellular accommodation of rhizobia and AM fungi, and in particular morphogenesis of the AM fungal feeding structures, the arbuscules, was shown to depend on the novel VAPYRIN protein.^9–11VAPYRINs are plant-specific proteins consisting of two protein-protein interaction domains, an N-terminal major sperm protein (MSP) domain and a C-terminal ankyrin (ANK) domain. MSP of C. elegans forms a cytoskeletal network required for the motility of the ameboidal sperm.¹² MSP domains also occur in VAP proteins that are involved in membrane fusion processes in various eukaryotes.¹³ The ANK domain, on the other hand, closely resembles animal ankyrins which serve to connect integral membrane proteins to elements of the spectrin cytoskeleton,¹⁴ thereby facilitating the assembly of functional membrane microdomains in diverse animal cells.¹⁵ Ankyrin repeats exhibit features of nano-springs, opening the possibility that ankyrin domains may be involved in mechanosensing.¹⁶ Based on these structural similarities, VAPYRIN may promote intracellular accommodation of endosymbionts by interacting with membranes and/or with the cytoskeleton. Indeed, VAPYRIN protein associates with small subcellular compartments in petunia and in Medicago truncatula.^9,10Ankyrin repeats typically consist of 33 amino acids, of which 30–40% are highly conserved across most taxa. These residues confer to the repeats their basic helix-turn-helix structure.¹⁷ Ankyrin domains often consist of arrays of several repeats that form a solenoid with a characteristic crescent shape.¹⁷ Besides the ankyrin-specific motiv-associated amino acids there is little conservation between the ankyrin domains of different proteins, or between the individual repeats of a given ankyrin domain,¹⁷ a feature that was also observed in petunia VAPYRIN (Fig. 1A).⁹ However, sequence comparison of VAPYRINs from eight dicots, three monocots and the moss Physcomitrella patens revealed a high degree of sequence conservation beyond the ankyrin-specific residues (Fig. 1B and Sup. Fig. S1). When the degree of conservation was determined for the individual ankyrin repeats among all the 12 species, it appeared that repeats 7, 9 and 10 exhibited particularly high conservation (Fig. 1C).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Sequence analysis and phylogeny of VAPYRIN from diverse plants. (A) Predicted amino acid sequence of the petunia VAPYRIN protein PAM1. The 11 repeats of the ankyrin domain are aligned, and the ankyrin consensus sequence is shown below the eleventh ankyrin repeat (line c). Conserved residues that are characteristic for ankyrin repeats (Mosavi et al. 2004)¹⁷ are depicted in bold face. (B) Unrooted phylogenetic tree representing the VAPYRINs of eight dicot species (Petunia hybrida, Solanum lycopersicon, Solanum tuberosum, Vitis vinifera, Populus trichocarpa, Ricinus communis, Medicago truncatula and Glycine max) three monocot species (Sorghum bicolor, Zea mays and Oryza sativa), and the moss Physcomitrella patens. (C) Degree of conservation of the individual ankyrin repeats of VAPYRIN. Schematic representation of the MSP domain as N-terminal barrel-shaped structure, and of the individual ankyrin repeats as pairs of alpha-helices. An additional loop occurring only in monocots (grass-loop) is inserted above repeat 4, and the deletion between repeat 7 and 8 is indicated (gap). This latter feature is common to all VAPYRIN proteins. The percentage of amino acid residues that are identical in at least 11 of the 12 VAPYRINS is given below the MSP domain and the eleven ankyrin repeats. The box highlights repeats 7–10 which contribute to the predicted binding site (compare with Figs. 3 and ​and44).Sequence comparison of the eleven repeats of all the twelve plant species revealed that the individual repeats clustered according to their position in the domain, rather than according to their origin (plant species) (Fig. 2). This shows that the repeats each are well conserved across species, but show little similarity among each other within a given VAPYRIN protein. The higher conservation of repeats 9 and 10 was reflected by the compact appearance of the respective branches, in which the monocot and moss sequences were nested closely with the dicot sequences, compared to other repeats, where the branches appeared fragmented between monocots and dicots, and where the P. patens sequence fell out of the branch as in the case of repeats 4–6 (Fig. 2). Taken together, this points to an old evolutionary origin of the entire ankyrin domain in lower land plants, with no subsequent rearrangement of ankyrin repeats.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Phylogenetic analysis of the individual ankyrin repeats of VAPYRIN. Phylogenetic representation of an alignment of all the 11 repeats of the 12 VAPYRINs compared in Figure 1B and C. The repeats cluster according to their position within the domain, rather than to their origin (plant species). Numbers indicate the position of the repeats within the domain (compare with Fig. 1C). P. patens repeats are highlighted (small circles) for clarity. The monocot repeat 4 sequences (boxed) are remote from the remaining repeat 4 sequences because of the grass loop (compare with Fig. 1C).Ankyrin domains function as protein-protein interaction domains,¹⁷ in which the residues on the surface are involved in the binding of their protein partners.¹⁴ The fact that repeats 9 and 10 exhibited particularly high levels of conservation across species from moss to angiosperms indicated that this region may contain functionally important residues. Within repeat 10, sixteen amino acid positions were identical in >90% of the analyzed species (Fig. 3A and grey bars). Nine of those represent residues that are characteristic for ankyrin repeats (red letters) and determine their typical 3D shape.¹⁷ These residues are considered ankyrin-specific, and are unlikely to be involved in a VAPYRIN-specific function. The remaining seven highly conserved residues in repeat 10, however, are VAPYRIN-specific, since they have been under positive selection, without being essential for the basic structure of the ankyrin repeat. Ankyrin-specific and VAPYRIN-specific residues where identified throughout the entire ankyrin domain (Sup. Fig. 1), and subsequently mapped on a 3-dimensional model of petunia VAPYRIN to reveal their position in the protein (Fig. 3B–G). The ankyrin-specific residues were found to be localized primarily to the interior of the ankyrin domain, with the characteristic glycines (brown) marking the turns between helices and loops (Fig. 3B, D and F, compare with A). In contrast, the VAPYRIN-specific residues were localized primarily on the surface of the ankyrin domain (Fig. 3C, E and G). A prominent clustering of VAPYRIN-specific residues was identified on the concave side of the crescent-shaped ankyrin domain comprising repeats 7–10 close to the gap (Figs. 3G and ​and44). This highly conserved VAPYRIN-specific region contains several negatively and positively charged residues (D, E and K, R, respectively) and aromatic residues (W, Y, F), which may together form a conserved binding site for an interacting protein.Open in a separate windowFigure 33D-Mapping of conserved positions within the ankyrin domain of VAPYRIN. (A) Conserved amino acid residues were evaluated for ankyrin repeat 10 of petunia VAPYRIN as an example. The degree of conservation between the 12 VAPYRINs analyzed in Figures 1B and ​and22 is depicted with grey bars. Average conservation between all the 132 ankyrin repeats of the 12 VAPYRIN sequences is shown with black bars. Residues that are conserved in all 132 repeats (red letters) define the ankyrin consensus sequence, which confers to the repeats their characteristic basic structure.¹⁷ Residues that are >90% conserved but are not part of the basic ankyrin sequence (highlighted with asterisks) are VAPYRIN-specific and may therefore have been conserved because of their specific function in VAPYRIN. Arrows indicate the characteristic antiparallel helices, the turns are marked by conserved glycine residues (underlined; compare with B, D and F). (B–G) 3D-models of the petunia VAPYRIN PAM1. Conserved amino acid residues were color-coded according to their physico-chemical properties (http://life.nthu.edu.tw/∼fmhsu/rasframe/SHAPELY.HTM) with minor modification (see below). In (B, D and F) the ankyrin-specific residues are highlighted (corresponding to the bold letters in Fig. 1A). In (C, E and G), the VAPYRIN-specific residues are highlighted. Note the patch of high conservation on the concave side of the crescent-shaped ankyrin domain between repeats 7–10 next to the gap. (B–E) represent respective side views of the ankyrin domain, (F and G) exhibit the concave inner side of the domain. Color code: Bright red: aspartic acid (D), glutamic acid (E); Yellow: cysteine (C); Blue: lysine (K), arginine (R); Orange: serine (S), threonine (T); Dark blue: phenylalanine (F), tyrosin (Y); Brown: glycine (G); Green: leucin (L), valine (V), isoleucin (I), alanine (A); Lilac: tryptophane (W); Purple: histidine (H); Pink: proline (P).Open in a separate windowFigure 4The highly conserved surface area in domain 8–10 of the ankyrin domain of petunia VAPYRIN. Close-up of the highly conserved region of petunia PAM1 as shown in Figure 3G. Amino acids were color-coded as in Figure 3 and their position in the amino acid sequence is indicated (compare with Sup. Fig. 1).In this context, it is interesting to note that human ankyrin R also contains a binding surface on the concave side of the D34 domain for the interaction with the CBD3 protein.¹⁴ Consistent with an essential function of the C-terminal third of the ankyrin domain, mutations that abolish this relatively short portion of VAPYRIN, have a strong phenotype, indicating that they may represent null alleles.⁹ Based on this collective evidence, we hypothesize that repeats 7–10 are involved in the formation of a protein complex that is essential for intracellular accommodation of rhizobia and AM fungi. Biochemical and genetic studies are now required to identify the binding partners of VAPYRINs, and to elucidate their role in plant endosymbioses.     

Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) related to pollen tube guidance into the embryo sac in Arabidopsis

Some AGP molecules or their sugar moieties are probably related to the guidance of the pollen tube into the embryo sac, in the final part of its pathway, when arriving at the ovules. The specific labelling of the synergid cells and its filiform apparatus, which are the cells responsible for pollen tube attraction, and also the specific labelling of the micropyle and micropylar nucellus, which constitutes the pollen tube entryway into the embryo sac, are quite indicative of this role. We also discuss the possibility that AGPs in the sperm cells are probably involved in the double fertilization process.Key words: Arabidopsis, arabinogalactan proteins, AGP 6, gametic cells, pollen tube guidanceThe selective labelling obtained by us with monoclonal antibodies directed to the glycosidic parts of AGPs, in Arabidopsis and in other plant species, namely Amaranthus hypochondriacus,¹ Actinidia deliciosa² and Catharanthus roseus, shows that some AGP molecules or their sugar moieties are probably related to the guidance of the pollen tube into the embryo sac, in the final part of its pathway, when arriving at the ovules. The evaluation of the selective labelling obtained with AGP-specific monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) JIM 8, JIM 13, MAC 207 and LM 2, during Arabidopsis pollen development, led us to postulate that some AGPs, in particular those with sugar epitopes identified by JIM 8 and JIM 13, can be classified as molecular markers for generative cell differentiation and development into male gametes.Likewise, we also postulated that the AGP epitopes recognized by Mabs JIM 8 and JIM 13 are also molecular markers for the development of the embryo sac in Arabidopsis thaliana. Moreover, these AGP epitopes are also present along the pollen tube pathway, predominantly in its last stage, the micropyle, which constitutes the region of the ovule in the immediate vicinity of the pollen tube target, the embryo sac.³We have recently shown the expression of AGP genes in Arabidopsis pollen grains and pollen tubes and also the presence of AGPs along Arabidopsis pollen tube cell surface and tip region, as opposed to what had been reported earlier. We have also shown that only a subset of AGP genes is expressed in pollen grain and pollen tubes, with prevalence for Agp6 and Agp11, suggesting a specific and defined role for some AGPs in Arabidopsis sexual reproduction (Pereira et al., 2006).⁴Therefore we continued by using an Arabidopsis line expressing GFP under the command of the Agp6 gene promoter sequence. These plants were studied under a low-power binocular fluorescence microscope. GFP labelling was only observed in haploid cells, pollen grains (Fig. 1) and pollen tubes (Fig. 2); all other tissues clearly showed no labelling. These observations confirmed the specific expression of Agp6 in pollen grains and pollen tubes. As shown in the Figures 1 and ​and2,2, the labelling with GFP is present in all pollen tube extension, so probably, AGP 6 is not one of the AGPs identified by JIM 8 and JIM 13, otherwise GFP light emission would localize more specifically in the sperm cells.⁵ So we think that MAC 207 which labels the entire pollen tube wall (Fig. 3) may indeed be recognizing AGP6, which seems to be expressed in the vegetative cell. In other words, the specific labelling obtained for the generative cell and for the two male gametes, is probably given by AGPs that are present in very low quantities, apparently not the case for AGP 6 or AGP 11.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Low-power binocular fluorescence microscope image of an Arabidopsis flower with the AGP 6 promoter:GFP construct. The labelling is evident in pollen grains that are being released and in others that are already in the stigma papillae.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Low-power binocular fluorescence microscope image of an Arabidopsis ovary with the AGP6 promoter:GFP construct. The ovary was partially opened to show the pollen tubes growing in the septum, and into the ovules. The pollen tubes are also labelled by GFP.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Imunofluorescence image of a pollen tube growing in vitro, and labeled by MAC 207 monoclonal antibody. The labelling is evident all over the pollen tube wall.After targeting an ovule, the pollen tube growth arrests inside a synergid cell and bursts, releasing the two sperm cells. It has recently been shown that sperm cells, for long considered to be passive cargo, are involved in directing the pollen tube to its target. In Arabidopsis, HAP2 is expressed only in the haploid sperm and is required for efficient pollen tube guidance to the ovules.⁶ The same could be happening with the AGPs identified in the sperm cells by JIM 8 and JIM 13. We are now working on tagging these AGPs and using transgenic plants aiming to answer to such questions.Pollen tube guidance in the ovary has been shown to be in the control of signals produced by the embryo sac. When pollen tubes enter ovules bearing feronia or sirene mutations (the embryo sac is mutated), they do not stop growing and do not burst. In Zea mays a pollen tube attractant was recently identified in the egg apparatus and synergids.⁷ Chimeric ZmEA1 fused to green fluorescent protein (ZmEA1:GFP) was first visible within the filiform apparatus and later was localized to nucellar cell walls below the micropylar opening of the ovule. This is the same type of labelling that we have shown in Arabidopsis ovules, using Mabs JIM 8 and JIM 13. We are now involved in the identification of the specific AGPs associated with the labellings that we have been showing.     

Mutational Biosynthesis of Novel Rapamycins by a Strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus NRRL 5491 Disrupted in rapL,Encoding a Putative Lysine Cyclodeaminase

The gene rapL lies within the region of the Streptomyces hygroscopicus chromosome which contains the biosynthetic gene cluster for the immunosuppressant rapamycin. Introduction of a frameshift mutation into rapL by ΦC31 phage-mediated gene replacement gave rise to a mutant which did not produce significant amounts of rapamycin. Growth of this rapL mutant on media containing added l-pipecolate restored wild-type levels of rapamycin production, consistent with a proposal that rapL encodes a specific l-lysine cyclodeaminase important for the production of the l-pipecolate precursor. In the presence of added proline derivatives, rapL mutants synthesized novel rapamycin analogs, indicating a relaxed substrate specificity for the enzyme catalyzing pipecolate incorporation into the macrocycle.Rapamycin is a 31-member macrocyclic polyketide produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus NRRL 5491 which, like the structurally related compounds FK506 and immunomycin (Fig. ​(Fig.1),1), has potent immunosuppressive properties (24). Such compounds are potentially valuable in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and in preventing the rejection of transplanted tissues (16). The biosynthesis of rapamycin requires a modular polyketide synthase, which uses a shikimate-derived starter unit (11, 20) and which carries out a total of fourteen successive cycles of polyketide chain elongation that resemble the steps in fatty acid biosynthesis (2, 27). l-Pipecolic acid is then incorporated (21) into the chain, followed by closure of the macrocyclic ring, and both these steps are believed to be catalyzed by a pipecolate-incorporating enzyme (PIE) (18), the product of the rapP gene (8, 15). Further site-specific oxidations and O-methylation steps (15) are then required to produce rapamycin. Open in a separate windowFIG. 1Structures of rapamycin, FK506, and immunomycin.The origin of the pipecolic acid inserted into rapamycin has been previously established (21) to be free l-pipecolic acid derived from l-lysine (although the possible role of d-lysine as a precursor must also be borne in mind) (9). Previous work with other systems has suggested several alternative pathways for pipecolate formation from lysine (22), but the results of the incorporation of labelled lysine into the pipecolate moiety of immunomycin (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) clearly indicate loss of the α-nitrogen atom (3). More recently, the sequencing of the rap gene cluster revealed the presence of the rapL gene (Fig. ​(Fig.2),2), whose deduced gene product bears striking sequence similarity to two isoenzymes of ornithine deaminase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (25, 26). Ornithine deaminase catalyzes the deaminative cyclization of ornithine to proline, and we have proposed (15) that the rapL gene product catalyzes the analogous conversion of l-lysine to l-pipecolate (Fig. ​(Fig.3).3). Open in a separate windowFIG. 2A portion of the rapamycin biosynthetic gene cluster which contains ancillary (non-polyketide synthase) genes (15, 27). PKS, polyketide synthase.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3(A) The conversion of l-ornithine to l-proline by ornithine cyclodeaminase (17). (B) Proposed conversion of l-lysine to l-pipecolic acid by the rapL gene product.Here, we report the use of ΦC31 phage-mediated gene replacement (10) to introduce a frameshift mutation into rapL and the ability of the mutant to synthesize rapamycins in the absence or presence of added pipecolate or pipecolate analogs.     

Glutathione signaling acts through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway to mitigate biotic stress

Glutathione (GSH) has widely been known to be a multifunctional molecule especially as an antioxidant up until now, but has found a new role in plant defense signaling. Research from the past three decades indicate that GSH is a player in pathogen defense in plants, but the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated fully. We have recently shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule and mitigates biotic stress through non-expressor of PR genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent salicylic acid (SA)-mediated pathway. Transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH (NtGB lines) was found to synthesize more SA, was capable of enhanced expression of genes belonging to NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway, were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae, the biotrophic pathogen and many SA-related proteins were upregulated. These results gathered experimental evidence on the mechanism through which GSH combats biotic stress. In continuation with our previous investigation we show here that the expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST), the NPR1-independent SA-mediated gene was unchanged in transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH as compared to wild-type plants. Additionally, the transgenic plants were barely resistant to Botrytis cinerea, the necrotrophic pathogen. SA-treatment led to enhanced level of expression of pathogenesis-related protein gene (PR1) and PR4 as against short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein (SDRLP) and allene oxide synthase (AOS). These data provided significant insight into the involvement of GSH in NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway in mitigating biotic stress.Key words: GSH, signaling molecule, biotrophic pathogen, NPR-1, PR-1, PR-4, transgenic tobaccoPlant responses to different environmental stresses are achieved through integrating shared signaling networks and mediated by the synergistic or antagonistic interactions with the phytohormones viz. SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).¹ Previous studies have shown that in response to pathogen attack, plants produce a highly specific blend of SA, JA and ET, resulting in the activation of distinct sets of defense-related genes.^2,3 Regulatory functions for ROS in defense, with a focus on the response to pathogen infection occur in conjunction with other plant signaling molecules, particularly with SA and nitric oxide (NO).^4–6 Till date, numerous physiological functions have been attributed to GSH in plants.^7–11 In addition to previous studies, recent study has also shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule in combating biotic stress through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway.^12,13Our recent investigation involved raising of transgenic tobacco overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS), the rate-limiting enzyme of the GSH biosynthetic pathway.¹² The stable integration and enhanced expression of the transgene at the mRNA as well as protein level was confirmed by Southern blot, quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. The transgenic plants of the T₂ generation (Fig. 1), the phenotype of which was similar to that of wild-type plants were found to be capable of synthesizing enhanced amount of GSH as confirmed by HPLC analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transgenic tobacco of T₂ generation, (A) three-week-old plant, (B) mature plant.In the present study, the expression profile of GST was analyzed in NtGB lines by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that the expression level of this gene is unchanged in NtGB lines as compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2). GST is known to be a NPR1-independent SA-related gene.¹⁴ This suggests that GSH does not follow the NPR1-independent SA-mediated pathway in defense signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression pattern of GST in wild-type and NtGB lines.Disease test assay with NtGB lines and wild-type plants was performed using B. cinerea and the NtGB lines showed negligible rate of resistance to this necrotrophic pathogen (Fig. 3). SA signaling has been known to control defense against biotrophic pathogen in contrast, JA/ET signaling controls defense against necrotrophic pathogen.^1,15 Thus it has again been proved that GSH is not an active member in the crosstalk of JA-mediated pathway, rather it follows the SA-mediated pathway as has been evidenced earlier.¹²Open in a separate windowFigure 3Resistance pattern of wild-type and NtGB lines against Botrytis cinerea.Additionally, the leaves of wild-type and NtGB lines were treated with 1 mM SA and the expression of PR1, SDRLP, AOS and PR4 genes were analyzed and compared to untreated plants to simulate pathogen infection. The expression of PR1 increased after exogenous application of SA. In case of PR4, the ET marker, the expression level increased in NtGB lines. On the other hand, the level of SDRLP was nearly the same. However, the expression of AOS was absent in SA-treated leaves (Fig. 4). PR1 has been known to be induced by SA-treatment¹⁶ which can be corroborated with our results. In addition, ET is known to enhance SA/NPR1-dependent defense responses,¹⁷ which was reflected in our study as well. AOS, the biosynthetic pathway gene of JA, further known to be the antagonist of SA, was downregulated in SA-treated plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Gene expression pattern of PR1, SDRLP, PR4 and AOS in untreated and SA-treated wildtype and NtGB lines.Taken together, it can be summarized that this study provided new evidence on the involvement of GSH with SA in NPR1-dependent manner in combating biotic stress. Additionally, it can be claimed that GSH is a signaling molecule which takes an active part in the cross-communication with other established signaling molecules like SA, JA, ET in induced defense responses and has an immense standpoint in plant defense signaling.     

A photoreceptor going nowhere but the nucleus

Cryptochrome 2 (CRY2) is a blue/UV-A light receptor that regulates light inhibition of cell elongation and photoperiodic promotion of floral initiation in Arabidopsis. We and others have previously shown that CRY2 is a nuclear protein that regulates gene expression to affect plant development. We also showed that CRY2 is phosphorylated in response to blue light and the phosphorylated CRY2 is most likely active and degraded in blue light. Given that protein translation (and probably chromophore attachment) takes place in the cytosol and that a photoreceptor would absorb photon instantaneously, it would be interesting to know where those inter-connected events occur in the cell. Our results showed that freshly synthesized CRY2 photoreceptor is inactive in the cytosol although it may be photon-excited, it is imported into the nucleus where the photoreceptor is phosphorylated, performs its function, becomes ubiquitinated, and eventually gets degraded (Fig. 1).¹ To our knowledge, this is the first example in any organism that a photoreceptor is shown to complete its post-translational life cycle in a single subcellular compartment.Open in a separate windowFigure 1A model depicting the post-translational life cycle of CRY2. Pi, phosphate group; Ubq, ubiquitin.Key words: blue light, cryptochrome, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, Arabidopsis     

Semaphorin Signals on the Road to Cancer Invasion and Metastasis

Semaphorins are a large family of secreted and membrane-bound molecules initially implicated in the development of the nervous system and in axon guidance. More recently, they have been found to regulate cell adhesion and cell motility, angiogenesis, immune function and tumor progression. Notably, Semaphorins have been implicated with opposite functions in cancer: either as putative tumor suppressors and anti-angiogenic factors, or as mediating tumor angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis. Interestingly, Semaphorins may display divergent activities in different cell types. These multifaceted functions may be explained by the involvement of different kinds of semaphorin receptor complexes, and by the consequent activation of multiple signaling pathways, in different cells or different functional stages. Semaphorin signaling is largely mediated by the Plexins. However, semaphorin receptor complexes may also include Neuropilins and tyrosine kinases implicated in cancer. In this review, we will focus on major open questions concerning the potential role of Semaphorin signals in cancer.Key words: semaphorin, plexin, neuropilin, migration, tumor, metastasis, signalingOver twenty different Semaphorin genes are known in vertebrates. They were initially discovered as repelling cues for axons, in the wiring of the neural system. However, they are currently considered versatile signals regulating cell migration, angiogenesis, tissue morphogenesis, immune function and cancer.^1–2 Semaphorins have been implicated with opposite functions in tumor progression (summarized in Fig. 1). For example, Semaphorins 3B and 3F are putative tumor suppressors, while the expression of Semaphorin 3C, 3E and 5C has been associated with tumor invasion and metastasis. Interestingly, certain Semaphorins display divergent activities in different cell types. These varied functions of Semaphorins are likely to be explained by the involvement of different receptor complexes and multiple signaling pathways.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Semaphorin signals on the road to cancer invasion and metastasis. Semaphorins play a regulatory role on the main elements driving cancer progression. They can be seen as “stop” or “go” signals for tumor cells, as well as for stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment. The scheme features some examples of the semaphorin signals implicated so far. More information on the implicated receptors and functional activities of the different semaphorins are summarized in 相似文献   

Actin bundling via LIM domains

The LIM domain is defined as a protein-protein interaction module involved in the regulation of diverse cellular processes including gene expression and cytoskeleton organization. We have recently shown that the tobacco WLIM1, a two LIM domain-containing protein, is able to bind to, stabilize and bundle actin filaments, suggesting that it participates to the regulation of actin cytoskeleton structure and dynamics. In the December issue of the Journal of Biological Chemistry we report a domain analysis that specifically ascribes the actin-related activities of WLIM1 to its two LIM domains. Results suggest that LIM domains function synergistically in the full-length protein to achieve optimal activities. Here we briefly summarize relevant data regarding the actin-related properties/functions of two LIM domain-containing proteins in plants and animals. In addition, we provide further evidence of cooperative effects between LIM domains by transiently expressing a chimeric multicopy WLIM1 protein in BY2 cells.Key words: Actin-binding proteins, actin-bundling, cysteine-rich proteins, cytoskeleton, LIM domainThe LIM domain is a ≈55 amino acid peptide domain that was first identified in 1990 as a common cystein-rich sequence found in the three homeodomain proteins LIN-11, Isl1 and MEC-3. It has since been found in a wide variety of eukaryotic proteins of diverse functions. Animals possess several families of LIM proteins, with members containing 1–5 LIM domains occasionally linked to other catalytic or protein-binding domains such as homeodomain, kinase and SH3 domains. In contrast, plants only possess two distinct sets of LIM proteins. One is plant-specific and has not been functionally characterized yet. The other one comprises proteins that exhibit the same overall structure as the animal cystein rich proteins (CRPs), i.e., two very similar LIM domains separated by a ≈50 amino acid-long interLIM domain and a relatively short and variable C-terminal domain (Fig. 1A). The mouse CRP2 protein was the first CRP reported to interact directly with actin filaments (AF) and to stabilize the latter.¹ Identical observations were subsequently described for the chicken CRP1 and tobacco WLIM1 proteins.^2,3 In addition, these two proteins were shown to arrange AF into cables both in vitro and in vivo and thus join the list of actin bundlers.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Domain maps for wild-type WLIM1 (A) and GFP-fused chimeric 3xWLIM1 (B). A. WLIM1 basically comprises a short N-terminal domain (Nt), two LIM domains (LIM1 and LIM2), an interLIM spacer (IL) and a C-terminal domain (Ct). B. 3xWLIM1 consists of three tandem WLIM1 copies. This chimeric protein has been fused in C-terminus to GFP and transiently expressed in tobacco BY2 cells.To identify the peptide domains of WLIM1 responsible for its actin-related properties/activities, we generated domain-deleted and single domain variants and submitted them to a series of in vivo and in vitro assays.⁴ Localization experiments established that both LIM domains are required to efficiently target the actin cytoskeleton in tobacco BY2 cells. High-speed (200,000 g) cosedimentation data confirmed that the actin-binding activity of WLIM1 relies on its LIM domains. Indeed, the deletion of either the first or the second LIM domain respectively resulted in a 5-fold and 10-fold decrease of the protein affinity for AF. Importantly, each single LIM domain was found able to interact with AF in an autonomous manner, although with a reduced affinity compared to the wild-type WLIM1. Low-speed (12,500 g) cosedimentation data and electron microscopy observations revealed that the actin bundling activity of WLIM1 is also triggered by its LIM domains. Surprisingly each single LIM domain was able to bundle AF in an autonomous manner, suggesting that WLIM1 has two discrete actin-bundling sites. However, the bundles induced by the variants containing only one LIM domain, i.e., LIM domain-deleted mutants and single LIM domains, differed from those induced by the full-length WLIM1. They appeared more wavy and loosely packed and formed only at relatively high protein:actin ratios. Together these data suggest that LIM domains are autonomous actin-binding and -bundling modules that function in synergy in wild-type WLIM1 to achieve optimal activities.To further assess the mechanism of cooperation between the LIM domains of plant CRP-related proteins, we generated a chimeric protein composed of three WLIM1 copies in tandem (3 × WLIM1, Fig. 1B), and transiently expressed it as a GFP-fusion in tobacco BY2 cells. We anticipated that such a six LIM domain-containing protein displays an even higher actin-bundling activity. (Fig. 2A) shows the typical actin cytoskeleton pattern in an expanding BY2 cell as visualized using the actin marker GFP-fABD2.⁵ As previously reported by Sheahan et al.,⁵ GFP-fABD2 decorated dense, transversely oriented, cortical networks as well as transvacuolar strands connecting the subcortical-perinuclear region to the cortex. Ectopic expression of WLIM1-GFP (BY2 cells normally do not express the WLIM1 gene) induced moderate but perceptible modifications of the actin cytoskeleton structure (Fig. 2B). Most AF are arranged in bundles thicker than those observed in GFP-fABD2 expressing cells and fine AF arrays are less frequently observed. As expected, this phenotype was significantly enhanced in cells transformed with the 3xWLIM1-GFP protein (Fig. 2C). Indeed, cells were almost devoided of fine AF arrays and exhibited very thick actin cables (Fig. 2C) that, at times (≈30 %), form atypical long looped structures (Fig. 2D). The appearance of such structures may result from the increase of cable stability and thickness induced by the 3xWLIM1-GFP protein, as these parameters are likely to determine, at least partially, the maximal length of actin bundles. Together the present observations support earlier data showing that LIM domains work in concert in LIM proteins to regulate actin bundling in plant cells. Strikingly, vertebrate and plant CRPs invariably contain two LIM domains. The lack, in these organisms, of CRP-related proteins combining more than two LIM domains may be explained by the fact that very thick cables, such as those induced by the artificial 3xWLIM1, may be too stable structures incompatible with the necessary high degree of actin cytoskeleton plasticity. As an exception, a muscle CRP-related protein with five LIM domains (Mlp84B) has been identified in Drosophila.⁶ However, rather than decorating actin filaments in an homogenous manner, this protein has been found to concentrate in a specialized region of the Z-discs where it stabilizes, in concert with D-titin, muscle sarcomeres.⁷Open in a separate windowFigure 2Typical actin cytoskeleton patterns in tobacco BY2 cells that have been transiently transformed, using a particle gun, with GFP-fABD2 (A), WLIM1-GFP (B), and 3xWLIM1-GFP (C and D). For each construct, more than 60 cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy. In the case of 3xWLIM1-GFP, two prevalent patterns have been observed (C and D). Bars = 20 µm.The relatively well conserved spacer length (≈50 amino acids) that separates the two LIM domains in vertebrate CRPs and related plant LIM proteins remains an intriguing feature the importance of which in actin cable organization remains to be established. Using electron microscopy we are currently evaluating the effects of the modification of the interLIM domain length on the structural properties of actin cables.     

Identification of a nicotine transporter in leaf vacuoles of Nicotiana tabacum

Alkaloids are, in some plant species, transported from the source organ after their biosynthesis and moved to sink organs via long distance transport. One representative is nicotine, which is biosynthesized in roots, then translocated to the leaves, and finally accumulated in the leaf vacuoles in Nicotiana species. Although the nicotine translocation was identified more than 10 years ago, no transport protein has been characterized concerning the inter-organ movement of this alkaloid.We characterized a novel multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE)-type transporter, Nt-JAT1 (Nicotiana tabacum jasmonate-inducible alkaloid transporter 1). Nt-JAT1 was co-regulated with biosynthetic genes following methyl jasmonate treatment. This MATE gene was expressed in the leaves, stems, and roots in tobacco plants. Biochemical analyses suggested that Nt-JAT1 transported nicotine. The location of Nt-JAT1 was shown to be the tonoplast. These data suggested that Nt-JAT1 plays an important role in the nicotine translocation by acting as a transporter responsible for the unloading of nicotine in the aerial parts of the plant and its deposition in the vacuoles (Fig. 1). To our knowledge, this is the first identification of a vacuolar transporter for alkaloids in plant. A possible application of this transporter for the production of valuable alkaloids is also discussed.Open in a separate windowFigure 1A model of nicotine accumulation in leaf cells. Nt-JAT1 transports nicotine to the vacuole via the H⁺ gradient at tonoplast.Key words: Nicotiana tabacum, nicotine, alkaloid, MATE, transporter, leaf vacuole     

Dynamic protein trafficking to the cell wall

Recently we have studied the secretion pattern of a pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (PMEI1) and a polygalacturonase inhibitor protein (PGIP2) in tobacco protoplast using the protein fusions, secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP. Both chimeras reach the cell wall by passing through the endomembrane system but using distinct mechanisms and through a pathway distinguishable from the default sorting of a secreted GFP. After reaching the apoplast, sec-GFP-PMEI1 is stably accumulated in the cell wall, while PGIP2-GFP undergoes endocytic trafficking. Here we describe the final localization of PGIP2-GFP in the vacuole, evidenced by co-localization with the marker Aleu-RFP, and show a graphic elaboration of its sorting pattern. A working model taking into consideration the presence of a regulated apoplast-targeted secretion pathway is proposed.Key words: cell wall trafficking, endocytosis, GPI-anchor, PGIP2, PMEI1, secretion pathway, vacuole fluorescent markerCell wall biogenesis, growth, differentiation and remodeling, as well as wall-related signaling and defense responses depend on the functionality of the secretory pathway. Matrix polysaccharides, synthesized in the Golgi stacks, and cell wall proteins, synthesized in the ER, are packaged into secretory vesicles that fuse with the plasma membrane (PM) releasing their cargo into the cell wall. Also the synthesis and deposition of cellulose itself are driven by the endomembrane system which controls the assembly, within the Golgi, and the export to the plasma membrane of rosette complexes of cellulose synthase.¹ Secretion to the cell wall has always been considered a default pathway² but recent studies have evidenced a complex regulation of wall component trafficking that does not seem to follow the default secretion model. Recent evidence that several cell wall proteins are retained in the Golgi stacks until specific signals at the N-terminal domain are proteolitically removed is a case in point.^3–5 Moreover, it has previously been reported that secretion of exogenous marker proteins (secGFP and secRGUS) and cell wall polysaccharides reach the PM through different pathways.⁶ More recently, we have reported that cell wall protein trafficking also occurs through mechanisms distinguishable from that of a secreted GFP suggesting that more complex events than the mechanisms of bulk flow control cell wall growth and differentiation.⁷ To follow cell wall protein trafficking we used a Phaseolus vulgaris polygalacturonase inhibitor protein (PGIP2) and an Arabidopsis pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (PMEI1) fused to GFP (PGIP2-GFP and secGFP-PMEI1). Both apoplastic proteins are involved in the remodeling of pectin network with different mechanisms. PGIP2 specifically inhibits exogenous fungal polygalacturonases (PGs) and is involved in the plant defense mechanisms against pathogenic fungi.^8,9 PMEI1 counteracts endogenous PME and takes part in the physiological synthesis and remodeling of the cell wall during growth and differentiation.^10,11 The specific functions of the two apoplastic proteins seem to be strictly related to the distinct mechanisms that control their secretion and stability in the cell wall. In fact, while secGFP-PMEI1 moves through ER and Golgi stacks linked to a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor, PGIP2-GFP moves as a cargo soluble protein. Furthermore, secGFP-PMEI1 is stably accumulated in the cell wall, while PGIP2-GFP, over the time, is internalized into endosomes and targeted to vacuole, likely for degradation. After reaching the cell wall, the different fate of the two proteins seems to be strictly related to the presence/absence of their physiological counteractors. PMEI regulates the demethylesterification of homogalacturonan by inhibiting pectin methyl esterase (PME) activity through the formation of a reversible 1:1 complex which is stable in the acidic cell wall environment.¹² Stable wall localization of PMEI1 is likely related to its interaction with endogenous PME, always present in the wall. Unlike PMEs, fungal polygalacturonases (PGs), the physiological interactors of PGIP2, are present in the cell wall only during a pathogen attack. The absence of PGs may determine PGIP2 internalization. Internalization events have been already reported for PM proteins,^13–16 while cell wall protein internalization is surely a less well-known event. To date, only internalization of an Arabidopsis pollen-specific PME^4,5,17 and PGIP2 ⁷ has been reported.To further confirm the internalization of PGIP2-GFP and its final localization into the vacuole, we constructed a red fluorescent variant (RFP) of the green fluorescent marker protein that accumulates in lytic or acidic vacuole because of the barley aleurain sorting determinants (Aleu-RFP).¹⁸ The localization of PGIP2-GFP was compared to that of Aleu-RFP by confocal microscopy in tobacco protoplasts transiently expressing both fusions. Sixty hours after transformation, PGIP2-GFP labeled the central vacuole as indicated by complete co-localization with the vacuolar marker (Fig. 1A–D). Instead, at the same time point, secGFP-PMEI1 still labeled the cell wall (Fig. 1E–H) and never reached the vacuolar compartment. To summarize PGIP2-GFP secretion pattern, a graphic elaboration of confocal images is reported describing the sorting of PGIP2GFP in tobacco protoplast (Fig. 1I). The protein transits through the endomembrane system (green) and reaches the cell wall which is rapidly regenerating as evidenced by immunostaining with the red monoclonal antibody JIM7 that binds to methylesterified pectins.¹⁹ PGIP2-GFP is then internalized in endosomes, labeled in yellow because of the co-localization with the styryl dye FM4-64, a red marker of the endocytic pathway.Open in a separate windowFigure 1PGIP2-GFP, but not secGFP-PMEI1, is internalized and reaches the vacuole in tobacco leaf protoplasts. (A) Approximately 60 h after transformation, PGIP2-GFP labeled the central vacuole as indicated by co-localization with the vacuole marker Aleu-RFP (B). (C) Merged image of (A and B). (D) Differential interference contrast (DIC) image of (A–C). On the contrary, secGFP-PMEI1 still labeled cell wall (E). (F) No co-localization is present in the vacuole labeled by Aleu-RFP. (G) Merged image of (E and F). (H) DIC image of (E–G). (I) Graphic elaboration of confocal images describing the sorting of PGIP2. The protein is sorted by the endomembrane system (green) to the cell wall (red) that is regenerated by the protoplast. Lacking the specific ligand, it is then internalized in endosome (yellow). Details are reported in the text.In Figure 2 we propose a model of the mechanism of secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP secretion derived from the different lines of evidence previously reported in reference ⁷. SecGFPPMEI1 (Fig. 2-1), but not PGIP2-GFP (Fig. 2-2), carries a GPI-anchor, required for its secretion to the cell wall. When the anchorage of GPI is inhibited by mannosamine (Fig. 2-a) or by the fusion of GFP to the C-terminus of PMEI1 (Fig. 2-b), the two non-anchored proteins accumulate in the Golgi stacks. Evidence of retention in Golgi stacks has already been reported for other two cell wall proteins.^3–5 Unlike secGFP-PMEI1, PGIP2-GFP is not stably accumulated in the cell wall and undergoes endocytic trafficking (Fig. 2-3). PGIP2-GFP internalization, likely due to the absence of PGs, might also be related with its ability to interact with homogalacturonan and oligogalacturonides,²⁰ which have been reported to internalize^21,22 (Fig. 2-4). Since SYP 121, a Qa-SNARE, is involved in the default secretion of secGFP,²³ but not in secretion of PGIP2-GFP and secGFP-PMEI1, trafficking mechanisms underlying secretion into the apoplast are likely different from those underlying the default route (Figs. 2-5). Taken as a whole, evidence suggests the existence of currently undefined signals that control apoplast-targeted secretion.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Schematic illustration for secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP trafficking. See text for details.