Enhancing mammary differentiation by overcoming lineage-specific epigenetic modification and signature gene expression of fibroblast-derived iPSCs

Recent studies have shown that induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) retain a memory of their origin and exhibit biased differentiation potential. This finding reveals a severe limitation in the application of iPSCs to cell-based therapy because it means that certain cell types are not available for reprogramming for patients. Here we show that the iPSC differentiation process is accompanied by profound gene expression and epigenetic modifications that reflect cells'' origins. Under typical conditions for mammary differentiation, iPSCs reprogrammed from tail-tip fibroblasts (TF-iPSCs) activated a fibroblast-specific signature that was not compatible with mammary differentiation. Strikingly, under optimized conditions, including coculture with iPSCs derived from the mammary epithelium or in the presence of pregnancy hormones, the fibroblast-specific signature of TF-iPSCs obtained during differentiation was erased and cells displayed a mammary-specific signature with a markedly enhanced ability for mammary differentiation. These findings provide new insights into the precise control of differentiation conditions that may have applications in personalized cell-based therapy.The mammary gland is a primary target for carcinogenesis. Breast cancer occurs at a high rate and affects one in eight women in Western countries during their lifetime.^{1, 2} In the United States alone, 232 340 new invasive breast cancer cases were reported for women in 2013 and 39 620 patients died.³ Regenerative therapy of the damaged mammary gland tissues is the best way to restore breast functions; therefore, the creation of stem cells that are capable of developing into fully functional mammary glands is desirable. There are two distinct types of pluripotent stem cells that may be used for this purpose. The first is embryonic stem cells (ESCs) derived from the inner cell mass of embryonic blastocysts,⁴ and the second is induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) obtained by reprogramming somatic cells.⁵ Although, in theory, both ESCs and iPSCs can be differentiated into any type of mature cell, use of the latter is more desirable because it does not require the killing of embryos, and the cells can be derived from virtually any type of tissue. In addition, because iPSCs can be generated from the same patient, the use of iPSCs avoids the immunosuppressive reactions that have long hampered organ and tissue transplantation.^{6, 7, 8} However, recent studies have shown that some iPSCs seem to retain a memory of their origin and exhibit skewed potential during differentiation for tissue/organ formation.^{9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14} This feature may represent a limitation if certain cell types from diseased tissues or organs are not available for reprogramming.Numerous studies about the use of ESCs have indicated that, although these cells have the potential to generate all cell types, their differentiation depends critically on many factors.^{14, 15, 16} Precise conditions are required for driving cells into specific pathways leading to new lineage formation (reviewed in Murry and Keller¹⁷ and Cahan and Daley¹⁸). Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the skewed differentiation of iPSCs could be overcome by providing favorable conditions for differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we have generated iPSCs from mouse mammary epithelial cells (ME-iPSCs) and mouse-tail fibroblasts (TF-iPSCs), and have studied the gene expression profiles and epigenetic modifications during differentiation. We found that, although these iPSCs activate distinct signature memories that are reflective of their origins during the differentiation process, the fate of iPSCs could be redirected under optimized conditions in favor of the formation of a desired tissue/organ.     

The onset of p53 loss of heterozygosity is differentially induced in various stem cell types and may involve the loss of either allele

p53 loss of heterozygosity (p53LOH) is frequently observed in Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) patients who carry a mutant (Mut) p53 germ-line mutation. Here, we focused on elucidating the link between p53LOH and tumor development in stem cells (SCs). Although adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) robustly underwent p53LOH, p53LOH in induced embryonic pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) was significantly attenuated. Only SCs that underwent p53LOH induced malignant tumors in mice. These results may explain why LFS patients develop normally, yet acquire tumors in adulthood. Surprisingly, an analysis of single-cell sub-clones of iPSCs, MSCs and ex vivo bone marrow (BM) progenitors revealed that p53LOH is a bi-directional process, which may result in either the loss of wild-type (WT) or Mut p53 allele. Interestingly, most BM progenitors underwent Mutp53LOH. Our results suggest that the bi-directional p53LOH process may function as a cell-fate checkpoint. The loss of Mutp53 may be regarded as a DNA repair event leading to genome stability. Indeed, gene expression analysis of the p53LOH process revealed upregulation of a specific chromatin remodeler and a burst of DNA repair genes. However, in the case of loss of WTp53, cells are endowed with uncontrolled growth that promotes cancer.Heterozygosity, caused by a mutation in a single allele of a tumor suppressor gene (TSG), is one of the first steps in malignant transformation.¹ Often, TSGs undergo loss of the wild-type (WT) allele, designated as loss of heterozygosity (LOH).^{2, 3, 4} Patients with the rare cancer predisposition Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), carrying germ-line heterozygous p53 mutations,⁵ apparently exhibit normal development yet later in adult life develop a wide spectrum of tumors; predominantly sarcomas,^{6, 7, 8} where 40–60% of tumors exhibit WT p53 loss of heterozygosity (p53LOH).⁸Giving that cancer development could be associated with stemness deregulation challenges, the notion that the occurrence of p53LOH in stem cells (SCs) may contribute to the emergence of cancer SCs. Genomic fidelity is a hallmark of SCs.⁹ The genome of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) is extremely stable, whereas adult stem cells (ASCs) exhibit a less stable genome.¹⁰ Genetic deregulation in ASCs was shown to be associated with tumor development.^{11, 12, 13} Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that acquire mutations in oncogenes/TSGs such as p53 may function as tumor-initiating cells leading to de-novo sarcomagensis.^{14, 15, 16, 17} Furthermore, MSCs isolated from young mice, aged in culture acquired clinically relevant p53 mutations.¹⁸ In all, these findings suggest a link between p53 inactivation in SCs and tumorigenesis.Although induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) seemed to represent ESCs,^{19, 20} several studies questioned the assumption that iPSCs are as genomically stable as ESCs.^{21, 22, 23, 24} p53 was found to have a major role in the generation of iPSCs both in attenuating reprogramming and controlling the quality of the reprogrammed cells.^{25, 26} An additional role of p53 during reprogramming may be an indirect effect on cell proliferation²⁷ and on the restriction of mesenchymal–epithelial transition during the early phases of reprogramming.²⁸ Importantly, Mutp53 cells exhibiting a fully reprogrammed iPSC phenotype in vitro, form malignant tumors in vivo, instead of the benign teratomas induced by the WTp53-iPSCs.²⁵ As p53 is the guardian of the genome, it is important to investigate how p53LOH would affect genome stability and tumorigenicity of iPSCs.The availability of in vitro SC p53LOH models (iPSCs, MSCs) can help decipher the role of p53LOH in cancer initiation. Indeed, the incidence of p53LOH was found to be extremely different between these SCs. Surprisingly, we found that reprograming of heterozygous p53 (HZp53) fibroblasts, which frequently undergo p53LOH, gave rise to iPSC clones, most of which retained their HZp53 status and exhibited features of normal WTp53-iPSCs. However, p53LOH process is robust in MSCs. Interestingly, single-cell sub-cloning of iPSCs, MSCs and ex vivo bone marrow (BM) progenitors revealed that, in addition to the loss of the WTp53, loss of the Mutp53 allele also takes place. Of note, this bi-directional p53LOH occurred in an age-dependent manner linking LOH to aging and tumorigenesis. Surprisingly, most of the p53LOH events in BM progenitors preferred the loss of the Mutp53 allele. Taken together, our results of a bi-directional p53LOH process, accompanied by a burst of DNA repair pathways, may suggest that p53LOH can be regarded as a DNA repair event. In the case of a DNA repair-orientated productive LOH process, where the Mutp53 allele is lost, cells are rescued of tumorigenesis. However, when the WTp53 allele is lost, cells become prone to tumor initiation.     

Differentiation of human neuroblastoma cells toward the osteogenic lineage by mTOR inhibitor

Current hypothesis suggest that tumors can originate from adult cells after a process of ''reprogramming'' driven by genetic and epigenetic alterations. These cancer cells, called cancer stem cells (CSCs), are responsible for the tumor growth and metastases. To date, the research effort has been directed to the identification, isolation and manipulation of this cell population. Independently of whether tumors were triggered by a reprogramming of gene expression or seeded by stem cells, their energetic metabolism is altered compared with a normal cell, resulting in a high aerobic glycolytic ''Warburg'' phenotype and dysregulation of mitochondrial activity. This metabolic alteration is intricately linked to cancer progression.The aim of this work has been to demonstrate the possibility of differentiating a neoplastic cell toward different germ layer lineages, by evaluating the morphological, metabolic and functional changes occurring in this process. The cellular differentiation reported in this study brings to different conclusions from those present in the current literature. We demonstrate that ''in vitro'' neuroblastoma cancer cells (chosen as experimental model) are able to differentiate directly into osteoblastic (by rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor) and hepatic lineage without an intermediate ''stem'' cell step. This process seems owing to a synergy among few master molecules, metabolic changes and scaffold presence acting in a concerted way to control the cell fate.Cancer stem cells are currently viewed as the cells capable of generating cancer (tumor-initiating cells), owing to their intrinsic features of self-renewal and longevity.¹ However, emerging evidence suggests a surprising ability of normal committed cells to act as reserve stem cells upon reprogramming following tissue damage resulting from inflammation and wound healing. This brings to the alternative hypothesis that tumors may originate from differentiated cells that have recovered stem cell properties owing to genetic or epigenetic reprogramming.^{1, 2} Possibly, both models are correct, and consequently there is a continuum of cells capable of generating cancer, ranging from early primitive stem cells to committed progenitor or even terminally differentiated cells.The development of methods for reprogramming somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) through ectopic expression of a few pluripotency factors holds the promise for disease modeling, drug screening studies and treatment of several diseases.³ Generating iPSCs from cancer cells might also clarify the mechanisms that underlie oncogenic transformation.^{4, 5} Thus reprogramming and oncogenic transformation are processes that have interesting common steps, while iPSCs generated from cancer cells could give clues to molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of human cancer.⁶ To date, there are only few reports demonstrating a successful reprogramming of human primary cancer cells. Only one report describes the reprogramming of human primary cancer cells⁷ while the remaining studies used established cell lines.^{8, 9, 10, 11, 12} Carrete et al.⁹ generated iPSCs from the chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cell line KBM7 carrying the BCR-ABL fusion oncogene by expressing four ectopic reprogramming factors (OCT4, KLF4, SOX2, and c-Myc (OKSM)). Conversely, Choi et al.¹⁰ reprogrammed EBV-immortalized B lymphocytes to pluripotency using non-integrative episomal vectors. Lin et al.¹¹ reprogrammed human skin cancer cell lines to pluripotency using the microRNA miR-302. Miyoshi et al.¹² reprogrammed gastrointestinal-transformed cell lines using retroviral vectors expressing c-Myc and BCL2. Finally, Hu et al.⁸ successfully reprogrammed primary human lymphoblasts from a BCR-ABL⁺CML patient using transgene-free iPSC technology to ectopically express OKSM and LIN28. In addition, Ramos-Mejia et al.⁴ in a recent review emphasize the importance of deciphering the barriers underlying the reprogramming process of primary cancer cells to obtain information on the links between pluripotency and oncogenic transformation that would be instrumental for therapy development.Cancer cells show distinct metabolic features. In fact, neoplastic cells adapt their metabolic pathways to face the demands of abnormal proliferation. For example, cancer cells increase glucose uptake and the rate of glycolysis even under normoxic conditions; this process of aerobic glycolysis was first described by Warburg et al.^{13, 14} and thence called Warburg effect. Recent studies are increasingly highlighting the importance of metabolic manipulation in cancer cells and how bio-energetic and biosynthetic changes could be exploited to stop tumor cells progression.^{15, 16, 17} Reprogramming, pluripotency, oncogenic transformation and metabolic changes are therefore connected processes that share interesting similarities.^{18, 19} The fact that the same alterations driving tumorigenesis can influence the reprogramming of non-cancer somatic cells is a double-edged sword. It poses safety concerns for the cell therapy applications with iPSCs, while at the same time it promotes further studies aimed to analyzing the mechanisms and barriers underlying the direct reprogramming of cancer cells. This is a fundamental attempt to acquire valuable new insight on reprogramming and cell transformation.²⁰Along these concepts, here we have investigated the possibility to revert cancer progression by targeting cancer cells, seen as deprogrammed cell and therefore similar to adult stem cells. Using a human neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y) as model, our work has been designed to experimentally explore different aspects. We show how these cells can differentiate toward a germ line different from the original one, modifying their morphology and acquiring metabolic changes which are distinctive of a more normal phenotype.     

Alzheimer's disease-related amyloid-β induces synaptotoxicity in human iPS cell-derived neurons

Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons have been proposed to be a highly valuable cellular model for studying the pathomechanisms of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). Studies employing patient-specific human iPSCs as models of familial and sporadic forms of AD described elevated levels of AD-related amyloid-β (Aβ). However, none of the present AD iPSC studies could recapitulate the synaptotoxic actions of Aβ, which are crucial early events in a cascade that eventually leads to vast brain degeneration. Here we established highly reproducible, human iPSC-derived cortical cultures as a cellular model to study the synaptotoxic effects of Aβ. We developed a highly efficient immunopurification procedure yielding immature neurons that express markers of deep layer cortical pyramidal neurons and GABAergic interneurons. Upon long-term cultivation, purified cells differentiated into mature neurons exhibiting the generation of action potentials and excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory GABAergic synapses. Most interestingly, these iPSC-derived human neurons were strongly susceptible to the synaptotoxic actions of Aβ. Application of Aβ for 8 days led to a reduction in the overall FM4–64 and vGlut1 staining of vesicles in neurites, indicating a loss of vesicle clusters. A selective analysis of presynaptic vesicle clusters on dendrites did not reveal a significant change, thus suggesting that Aβ impaired axonal vesicle clusters. In addition, electrophysiological patch-clamp recordings of AMPA receptor-mediated miniature EPSCs revealed an Aβ-induced reduction in amplitudes, indicating an impairment of postsynaptic AMPA receptors. A loss of postsynaptic AMPA receptor clusters was confirmed by immunocytochemical stainings for GluA1. Incubation with Aβ for 8 days did not result in a significant loss of neurites or cell death. In summary, we describe a highly reproducible cellular AD model based on human iPSC-derived cortical neurons that enables the mechanistic analysis of Aβ-induced synaptic pathomechanisms and the development of novel therapeutic approaches.In Alzheimer''s disease (AD), synapse damage and synapse loss are thought to underlie cognitive deficits.¹ Oligomers of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide appear to induce synaptic failure as an early event in the etiology of AD.^{2, 3, 4} However, despite its well-established synapse-impairing effects in rodent models,^{5, 6, 7} the synaptotoxic actions of Aβ most relevant for the human disease have not been identified in a human model system. Several studies have investigated the synaptotoxic effects of Aβ in cultured rodent neurons and in transgenic mouse models revealing a multitude of potential mechanisms affecting synapses. Postsynaptic Aβ actions result in the loss of functional (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-type) glutamate receptors,^{8, 9, 10} involve long-term depression-like mechanisms,^{9, 11, 12} and lead to the degradation of the entire postsynapse (dendritic spines).^{9, 11, 13} In addition, several distinct presynaptic Aβ actions on the synaptic vesicle cycle have been described.^{10, 14} Furthermore, Aβ-induced impairments of axonal transport regulation and Aβ-induced axon degeneration have been found in rodent neurons.^{15, 16, 17} This puzzling diversity of Aβ-induced synapse-related defects raises the question whether all of them are involved in the early pathomechanisms of human AD.In addition to well-established animal systems, the modelling of human neurological disease pathologies by human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) technology¹⁸ has been proposed as an innovative approach.^{19, 20, 21} The in vitro differentiation of hiPSCs to excitable neurons has been reported using a variety of protocols.^{22, 23, 24} However, quantitative analysis of both functional glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses has been difficult to achieve.^{19, 25, 26} In addition to studying the functional properties of iPSC-derived human neurons from healthy individuals, the in vitro differentiation of patient-derived iPSCs has been used to model complex neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases.^{19, 27, 28} Recently, iPSCs derived from AD patients have been reported to exhibit increased secretion of Aβ upon in vitro neuronal differentiation; however, neither a loss of synapses nor an impairment of synapse function was detected.^{21, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33} Here we describe a hiPSC-based, carefully optimized in vitro differentiation protocol, including a novel immunopanning step, which enabled us to study the deleterious effects of application of Aβ on human cortical neurons and on human synapses.     

Distinct roles of RIP1–RIP3 hetero- and RIP3–RIP3 homo-interaction in mediating necroptosis

Necroptosis is mediated by a signaling complex called necrosome, containing receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1, RIP3, and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). It is known that RIP1 and RIP3 form heterodimeric filamentous scaffold in necrosomes through their RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) domain-mediated oligomerization, but the signaling events based on this scaffold has not been fully addressed. By using inducible dimer systems we found that RIP1–RIP1 interaction is dispensable for necroptosis; RIP1–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis signaling, but there is no necroptosis if no additional RIP3 protein is recruited to the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer, and the interaction with RIP1 promotes the RIP3 to recruit other RIP3; RIP3–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis and RIP3–RIP3 dimerization is sufficient to induce necroptosis; and RIP3 dimer-induced necroptosis requires MLKL. We further show that RIP3 oligomer is not more potent than RIP3 dimer in triggering necroptosis, suggesting that RIP3 homo-interaction in the complex, rather than whether RIP3 has formed homo polymer, is important for necroptosis. RIP3 dimerization leads to RIP3 intramolecule autophosphorylation, which is required for the recruitment of MLKL. Interestingly, phosphorylation of one of RIP3 in the dimer is sufficient to induce necroptosis. As RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer itself cannot induce necroptosis, the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid fibril is unlikely to directly propagate necroptosis. We propose that the signaling events after the RIP1–RIP3 amyloid complex assembly are the recruitment of free RIP3 by the RIP3 in the amyloid scaffold followed by autophosphorylation of RIP3 and subsequent recruitment of MLKL by RIP3 to execute necroptosis.Necroptosis is a type of programmed necrosis characterized by necrotic morphological changes, including cellular organelle swelling, cell membrane rupture,^{1, 2, 3} and dependence of receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1⁴ and RIP3.^{5, 6, 7} Physiological function of necroptosis has been illustrated in host defense,^{8, 9, 10, 11} inflammation,^{12, 13, 14, 15, 16} tissue injury,^{10, 17, 18} and development.^{19, 20, 21}Necroptosis can be induced by a number of different extracellular stimuli such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF). TNF stimulation leads to formation of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) signaling complex (named complex I), and complex II containing RIP1, TRADD, FAS-associated protein with a death domain (FADD), and caspase-8, of which the activation initiates apoptosis. If cells have high level of RIP3, RIP1 recruits RIP3 to form necrosome containing FADD,^{22, 23, 24} caspase-8, RIP1, and RIP3, and the cells undergo necroptosis.^{25, 26} Caspase-8 and FADD negatively regulates necroptosis,^{27, 28, 29, 30} because RIP1, RIP3, and CYLD are potential substrates of caspase-8.^{31, 32, 33, 34} Necrosome also suppresses apoptosis but the underlying mechanism has not been described yet. Mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) is downstream of RIP3,^{35, 36} and phosphorylation of MLKL is required for necroptosis.^{37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42}Apoptosis inducing complex (complex II) and necrosome are both supramolecular complexes.^{43, 44, 45} A recent study showed that RIP1 and RIP3 form amyloidal fibrils through their RIP homotypic interaction motif⁴⁶ (RHIM)-mediated polymerization, and suggested that amyloidal structure is essential for necroptosis signaling.⁴⁷ The RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex is believed to function as a scaffold that brings signaling proteins into proximity to permit their activation. However, RIP1 and RIP3 also can each form fibrils on their own RHIM domains in vitro. It is unclear how the homo- and hetero-interactions are coordinated and organized on the amyloid scaffold to execute their functions in necroptosis. Here, we used inducible dimerization systems to study the roles of RIP1–RIP1, RIP1–RIP3, and RIP3–RIP3 interactions in necroptosis signaling. Our data suggested that it is the RIP1–RIP3 interaction in the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex that empowers to recruit other free RIP3; homodimerization of RIP3 triggers its autophosphorylation and only the phosphorylated RIP3 can recruit MLKL to execute necroptosis.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Daytime Blue Light Enhances the Nighttime Circadian Melatonin Inhibition of Human Prostate Cancer Growth

Light controls pineal melatonin production and temporally coordinates circadian rhythms of metabolism and physiology in normal and neoplastic tissues. We previously showed that peak circulating nocturnal melatonin levels were 7-fold higher after daytime spectral transmittance of white light through blue-tinted (compared with clear) rodent cages. Here, we tested the hypothesis that daytime blue-light amplification of nocturnal melatonin enhances the inhibition of metabolism, signaling activity, and growth of prostate cancer xenografts. Compared with male nude rats housed in clear cages under a 12:12-h light:dark cycle, rats in blue-tinted cages (with increased transmittance of 462–484 nm and decreased red light greater than 640 nm) evinced over 6-fold higher peak plasma melatonin levels at middark phase (time, 2400), whereas midlight-phase levels (1200) were low (less than 3 pg/mL) in both groups. Circadian rhythms of arterial plasma levels of linoleic acid, glucose, lactic acid, pO₂, pCO₂, insulin, leptin, and corticosterone were disrupted in rats in blue cages as compared with the corresponding entrained rhythms in clear-caged rats. After implantation with tissue-isolated PC3 human prostate cancer xenografts, tumor latency-to-onset of growth and growth rates were markedly delayed, and tumor cAMP levels, uptake–metabolism of linoleic acid, aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect), and growth signaling activities were reduced in rats in blue compared with clear cages. These data show that the amplification of nighttime melatonin levels by exposing nude rats to blue light during the daytime significantly reduces human prostate cancer metabolic, signaling, and proliferative activities.Abbreviations: A-V, arterial–venous difference, ipRGC, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell, LA, linoleic acid, 13-HODE, 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid, TFA, total fatty acidsLight profoundly influences circadian, neuroendocrine, and neurobehavioral regulation in all mammals and is essential to life on our planet.^{2,15,28, 40} The light–dark cycle entrains the master biologic clock, located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the brain, in an intensity-, duration-, and wavelength-dependent manner.^8-13 Photobiologic responses, including circadian rhythms of metabolism and physiology, are mediated by organic molecules called ‘chromophores,’ which are contained within a small subset of retinal cells, called the intrinsically sensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGC).^{16,29,31,36,41,49,53,59} In humans and rodents light quanta are detected by the chromophore melanopsin, which detects light quanta in principally the short-wavelength, blue-appearing portion of the spectrum (446 to 477 nm), and transmits its photic information via the retinohypothalamic tract to the ‘molecular clock’ of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. This region of the brain regulates the daily pineal gland production of the circadian neurohormone melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine), which results in high levels produced at night and low levels during daytime.^38,54 The daily, rhythmic melatonin signal provides temporal coordination of normal behavioral and physiologic functions including chronobiologic rhythms of locomotor activity,² sleep-wake cycle,^2,14 dietary and water intake,^2,51 hormone secretion and metabolism.^5,44,47,61 Alterations in light intensity, duration, and spectral quality at a given time of day,^{8-13,17,19-22,24,61} such as occurs in night-shift workers exposed to light at night,^26,34,46,57 acutely suppresses endogenous melatonin levels in most mammalian species^{9,11,44,45,54,55} and may lead to various disease states, including metabolic syndrome^5,61 and carcinogenesis.^4-7,17,18Recent studies from our laboratory^{5,20,23-25,60,61} have demonstrated that relatively small changes in the spectral transmittance (color) of light passing through translucent amber (>590 nm), blue (>480 nm), and red-tinted (>640 nm) polycarbonate laboratory rodent cages, compared with standard polycarbonate clear cages (390 to 700 nm), during the light phase markedly influenced the normal nighttime melatonin signal and disrupted temporal coordination of metabolism and physiology.^19,24,61 Most notable was our discovery that, in both male and female pigmented nude rats maintained in blue-tinted rodent cages, nighttime melatonin levels were as much as 7 times higher than normal nighttime peak levels in animals maintained in all other cage types.¹⁹ An earlier study in human subjects diagnosed with midwinter insomnia coupled with low nighttime melatonin levels demonstrated that daily exposure to intense morning bright polychromatic light therapy for up to one week resulted in a restoration of nocturnal melatonin levels to those of control subjects.³⁵ In another study, exposure to blue-tinted (470 nm) LED light (100 lx) for approximately 20 min in the morning after 2 sleep-restricted (6 h) nights led to earlier onset of the melatonin surge at nighttime.³⁰In the United States alone this year, approximately 240,000 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and nearly 30,000 will die from this disease (National Cancer Institute; www.cancer.gov/). Epidemiologic studies have shown that night shift work, which involves circadian disruption, including nocturnal melatonin suppression, markedly increases prostate cancer risk in men.^{26,34,46,57,58} Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that melatonin inhibits human prostate cancer growth, including that of androgen-receptor–negative, castration-resistant PC3 human prostate cancer cells.^20,29,42,56 Cancer cells depend primarily on aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) over oxidative phosphorylation to meet their bioenergetic needs supporting biomass formation.⁵ The Warburg effect is characterized by increased cellular uptake of glucose and production of lactate despite an abundance of oxygen. Investigations have shown that signal transduction pathways that include AKT, MEK, NFκB, GS3Kβ, and PDK1 drive the Warburg effect.^5,61 In addition, cancer cells rely on increased uptake of the ω6 fatty acid linoleic acid (LA), which is prevalent in the western diet.^4-6 In most cancers, LA uptake occurs through a cAMP-dependent transport mechanism, and LA is metabolized to the mitogenic agent 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (13-HODE). In most tumors, 13-HODE plays an important role in enhancing downstream phosphorylation of ERK 1/2, AKT, and activation of the Warburg effect, thereby leading to increased cell proliferation and tumor growth.^4-6 Melatonin, the principal neurohormone of the pineal gland and whose production is regulated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus,^4,5 modulates processes of tumor initiation, progression, and growth in vivo.⁵ The circadian nocturnal melatonin signal not only inhibits LA uptake and metabolism, the Warburg effect in human cancer xenografts, and ultimately tumor growth, but it actually drives circadian rhythms in tumor metabolism, signal transduction activity, and cell proliferation. These effects are extinguished when melatonin production is suppressed by light exposure at night.⁵In the present investigation, we examined the hypothesis that the spectral transmittance (color) of short-wavelength (480 nm) bright light passing through blue-tinted standard laboratory rodent cages during the light phase not only amplifies the normal circadian nocturnal melatonin signal but also enhances the inhibition of the metabolism, signaling activity, and growth progression of human PC3 androgen-receptor–negative human prostate cancer xenografts in male nude rats.     

Depletion of white adipocyte progenitors induces beige adipocyte differentiation and suppresses obesity development

Overgrowth of white adipose tissue (WAT) in obesity occurs as a result of adipocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia. Expansion and renewal of adipocytes relies on proliferation and differentiation of white adipocyte progenitors (WAP); however, the requirement of WAP for obesity development has not been proven. Here, we investigate whether depletion of WAP can be used to prevent WAT expansion. We test this approach by using a hunter-killer peptide designed to induce apoptosis selectively in WAP. We show that targeted WAP cytoablation results in a long-term WAT growth suppression despite increased caloric intake in a mouse diet-induced obesity model. Our data indicate that WAP depletion results in a compensatory population of adipose tissue with beige adipocytes. Consistent with reported thermogenic capacity of beige adipose tissue, WAP-depleted mice display increased energy expenditure. We conclude that targeting of white adipocyte progenitors could be developed as a strategy to sustained modulation of WAT metabolic activity.Obesity, a medical condition predisposing to diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and complicating other life-threatening diseases, is becoming an increasingly important social problem.^{1, 2, 3} Development of pharmacological approaches to reduction of body fat has remained a daunting task.⁴ Approved obesity treatments typically produce only moderate and temporary effects.^2,5 White adipocytes are the differentiated cells of white adipose tissue (WAT) that store triglycerides in lipid droplets.^6,7 In contrast, adipocytes of brown adipose tissue (BAT) dissipate excess energy through adaptive thermogenesis. Under certain conditions, white adipocytes can become partially replaced with brown-like ‘beige'' (‘brite'') adipocytes that simulate the thermogenic function of BAT adipocytes.^7,8 Obesity develops in the context of positive energy balance as a result of hypertrophy and hyperplasia of white adipocytes.⁹Expansion and renewal of the white adipocyte pool in WAT continues in adulthood.^10,11 This process is believed to rely on proliferation and self-renewal of mesenchymal precursor cells¹² that we term white adipocyte progenitors (WAPs). WAPs reside within the population of adipose stromal cells (ASCs)¹³ and are functionally similar to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).^{14, 15, 16} ASCs can be isolated from the stromal/vascular fraction (SVF) of WAT based on negativity for hematopoietic (CD45) and endothelial (CD31) markers.^17,18 ASCs support vascularization as mural/adventitial cells secreting angiogenic factors^5,19 and, unlike bone marrow MSCs, express CD34.^19,20 WAPs have been identified within the ASC population based on expression of mesenchymal markers, such as platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β (PDGFRβ, aka CD140b) and pericyte markers.^17,18 Recently, a distinct ASC progenitor population capable of differentiating into both white and brown adipocytes has been identified in WAT based on PDGFRα (CD140a) expression and lack of PDGFRβ expression.^21,22 The physiological relevance of the two precursor populations residing in WAT has not been explored.We have previously established an approach to isolate peptide ligands binding to receptors selectively expressed on the surface of cell populations of interest.^{23, 24, 25, 26, 27} Such cell-targeted peptides can be used for targeted delivery of experimental therapeutic agents in vivo. A number of ‘hunter-killer'' peptides²⁸ composed of a cell-homing domain binding to a surface marker and of KLAKLAK₂ (sequence KLAKLAKKLAKLAK), a moiety inducing apoptosis upon receptor-mediated internalization, has been described by our group.^26,29 Such bimodal peptides have been used for depletion of malignant cells and organ-specific endothelial cells in preclinical animal models.^26,30,31 Recently, we isolated a cyclic peptide WAT7 (amino acid sequence CSWKYWFGEC) based on its specific binding to ASCs.²⁰ We identified Δ-decorin (ΔDCN), a proteolytic cleavage fragment of decorin, as the WAT7 receptor specifically expressed on the surface of CD34+PDGFRβ+CD31-CD45- WAPs and absent on MSCs in other organs.²⁰Here, we investigated whether WAPs are required for obesity development in adulthood. By designing a new hunter-killer peptide that directs KLAKLAK₂ to WAPs through WAT7/ΔDCN interaction, we depleted WAP in the mouse diet-induced obesity model. We demonstrate that WAP depletion suppresses WAT growth. We show that, in response to WAP deficiency, WAT becomes populated with beige adipocytes. Consistent with the reported thermogenic function of beige adipocytes,^32,33 the observed WAT remodeling is associated with increased energy expenditure. We identify a population of PDGFRα-positive, PDGFRβ-negative ASCs reported recently²² as a population surviving WAP depletion and responsible for WAT browning.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

Activation of volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying chloride channel by ROS contributes to ER stress and cardiac contractile dysfunction: involvement of CHOP through Wnt

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress occurring in stringent conditions is critically involved in cardiomyocytes apoptosis and cardiac contractile dysfunction (CCD). However, the molecular machinery that mediates cardiac ER stress and subsequent cell death remains to be fully deciphered, which will hopefully provide novel therapeutic targets for these disorders. Here, we establish tunicamycin-induced model of cardiomyocyte ER stress, which effectively mimicks pathological stimuli to trigger CCD. Tunicamycin activates volume-sensitive outward rectifying Cl⁻ currents. Blockade of the volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying (VSOR) Cl⁻ channel by 4,4''-diisothiocya-natostilbene-2,2''-disulfonic acid (DIDS), a non-selective Cl⁻ channel blocker, and 4-(2-butyl-6,7-dichlor-2-cyclopentyl-indan-1-on-5-yl) oxybutyric acid (DCPIB), a selective VSOR Cl⁻ channel blocker, improves cardiac contractility, which correlates with suppressed ER stress through inhibiting the canonical GRP78/eIF2α/ATF4 and XBP1 pathways, and promotes survival of cardiomyocytes by inverting tunicamycin-induced decrease of Wnt through the CHOP pathway. VSOR activation of tunicamycin-treated cardiomyocytes is attributed to increased intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Our study demonstrates a pivotal role of ROS/VSOR in mediating ER stress and functional impairment of cardiomyocytes via the CHOP-Wnt pathway, and suggests the therapeutic values of VSOR Cl⁻ channel blockers against ER stress-associated cardiac anomalies.The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is characterized as an organelle that participates in the folding of membrane and secretory proteins.^1,2 Efficient functioning of the endoplasmic reticulum is important for cell function and survival. Perturbations of ER homeostasis by energy deprivation and glucose,³ viral infections⁴ and accumulation of misfolded and/or unfolded proteins² interfere with ER function, leading to a state of ER stress.^{5, 6, 7} A cohort of chemicals, for example, tunicamycin and thapsigargin, also trigger ER stress.^{8, 9, 10} Thapsigargin disrupts the calcium storage of ER by blocking calcium reuptake into the ER lumen, thus by depleting calcium from the organelle.¹¹ In particular, tunicamycin is a highly specific ER stress inducer by inhibiting N-linked glycosylation of protein, representing a well-documented method to artificially elicit unfolded protein response.⁸ In response to ER stress, ER chaperones such as glucose-regulated protein 78 kDa (GRP78) and glucose-regulated protein 94 kDa (GRP94) are upregulated to facilitate the recovery of unfolded or misfolded proteins.¹² ER stress may act as a defense mechanism against external insults; however, prolonged and/or severe ER stress may ultimately trigger apoptosis.⁸ The C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) has been defined as a pivotal mediator of cell death signaling in ER stress.^{13, 14} Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that ER stress-induced cell death is an essential step in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of cardiovascular diseases such as ischemia reperfusion heart diseases,¹⁵ atherosclerosis,^{5, 16, 17, 18} myocardial infarction,¹⁹ hypertension^{20, 21} and heart failure.^{8, 22, 23} Inhibiting ER stress has great therapeutic values for cardiac anomalies. However, the precise mechanism involved in ER stress-induced cardiovascular diseases has not been well identified, which impedes the translation of our understanding of ER stress-induced cardiovascular anomalies into effective therapeutic strategies. Apoptosis induction requires persistent cell shrinkage, named apoptotic volume decrease (AVD).^{24, 25, 26, 27} It is an early prerequisite for the activation of caspases.²⁴ In various types of cells including cardiomyocytes, AVD process is accomplished by the activation of volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying (VSOR) Cl⁻ channel and is concomitant with the egress of water from the cells undergoing mitochondrion-initiated or death receptor-induced apoptosis.^{25, 28, 29, 30} Although inhibition of VSOR Cl⁻ channel by DIDS (4,4''-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2''-disulphonic acid) and DCPIB (4-(2-butyl-6,7- dichlor-2-cyclopentyl-indan-1-on-5-yl) oxybutyric acid) blocked AVD and rescued cardiomyocytes from mitochondrial and death receptor pathway-induced apoptosis,^{31, 32} it remains largely unknown concerning the role of VSOR Cl⁻ channel and how it is regulated in ER stress-induced apoptotic cardiomyocyte death.Emerging evidence indicates that Wnt signal pathways are found to be anti-apoptotic in the cardiovascular diseases,^{33, 34, 35} regulating crucial aspects of cardiovascular biology. However, up to now, its activity in ER stress-induced apoptosis and in the process of AVD in cardiomyocytes remains elusive.In the present study, we probed the role of VSOR Cl⁻ channel in ER stress-induced apoptosis of cardiomyocytes, which intimately correlates with cardiac contractile dysfunction (CCD). We hypothesized that VSOR Cl⁻ channel controls the process of AVD occurring concomitantly with ER stress-induced apoptosis of cardiomyocytes. To test this hypothesis, we investigated VSOR Cl⁻ currents in cardiomyocytes treated with the ER stress inducer tunicamycin. The pathophysiological role of VSOR Cl⁻ channel and the potential signaling mechanisms in the development of ER stress-induced apoptosis in CCD were also dissected.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.     

Role of Retinoic Acid and Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 in Neural Differentiation from Cynomolgus Monkey (Macaca fascicularis) Embryonic Stem Cells

Retinoic acid is a widely used factor in both mouse and human embryonic stem cells. It suppresses differentiation to mesoderm and enhances differentiation to ectoderm. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) is widely used to induce differentiation to neurons in mice, yet in primates, including humans, it maintains embryonic stem cells in the undifferentiated state. In this study, we established an FGF2 low-dose-dependent embryonic stem cell line from cynomolgus monkeys and then analyzed neural differentiation in cultures supplemented with retinoic acid and FGF2. When only retinoic acid was added to culture, neurons differentiated from FGF2 low-dose-dependent embryonic stem cells. When both retinoic acid and FGF2 were added, neurons and astrocytes differentiated from the same embryonic stem cell line. Thus, retinoic acid promotes the differentiation from embryonic stem cells to neuroectoderm. Although FGF2 seems to promote self-renewal in stem cells, its effects on the differentiation of stem cells are influenced by the presence or absence of supplemental retinoic acid.Abbreviations: EB, embryoid body; ES, embryonic stem; ESM, embryonic stem cell medium; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor; MBP, myelin basic protein; RA, retinoic acid; SSEA, stage-specific embryonic antigen; TRA, tumor-related antigenPluripotent stem cells are potential sources of material for cell replacement therapy and are useful experimental tools for in vitro models of human disease and drug screening. Embryonic stem (ES) cells are capable of extensive proliferation and multilineage differentiation, and thus ES-derived cells are suitable for use in cell-replacement therapies.^18,23 Reported ES cell characteristics including tumorigenic potential, DNA methylation status, expression of imprinted genes, and chromatin structure were elucidated by using induced pluripotent stem cells.^2,11,17 Because the social expectations of regeneration medicine are growing, we must perform basic research with ES cells, which differ from induced pluripotent stem cells in terms of origin, differentiation ability, and epigenetic status.^2,8Several advances in research have been made by using mouse ES cells. Furthermore, primate ES cell lines have been established from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta),²⁴ common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus),²⁵ cynomolgus monkeys (M. fascicularis),²⁰ and African green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops).¹⁹ Mouse and other mammalian ES cells differ markedly in their responses to the signaling pathways that support self-renewal.^8,28 Mouse ES cells require leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)–STAT3 signaling.¹⁴ In contrast, primate ES cells do not respond to LIF. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) appears to be the most upstream self-renewal factor in primate ES cells. FGF2 also exerts its effects through indirect mechanisms, such as the TGFβ–Activin–Nodal signaling pathway, in primate ES cells.²¹ In addition to the biologic similarities between monkeys and humans, ES cells derived from cynomolgus monkeys or human blastocysts have extensive similarities that are not apparent in mouse ES cells.^8,14,21,28 Numerous monkey ES cell lines are now available, and cynomolgus monkeys are an efficient model for developing strategies to investigate the efficacy of ES-cell–based medical treatments in humans.Several growth factors and chemical compounds, including retinoic acid (RA),^4,9,13,22,26 FGF2,^9,10,16,22 epidermal growth factor,^9,22 SB431542,^1,4,10 dorsomorphin,^10,27 sonic hedgehog,^{12,13,16,27,29} and noggin,^1,4,9,27 are essential for the differentiation and proliferation or maintenance of neural stem cells derived from primate ES cells. Of these factors, active RA signaling suppresses a mesodermal fate by inhibiting Wnt and Nodal signaling pathways during in vitro culture and leads to neuroectoderm differentiation in ES cells.^4,13,26 RA is an indispensable factor for the specialization to neural cells. FGF2 is important during nervous system development,¹² and FGF2 and RA both are believed to influence the differentiation to neural cells. The current study was done to clarify the mechanism of RA and FGF2 in the induction of differentiation along the neural lineage.We recently established a monkey ES cell line that does not need FGF2 supplementation for maintenance of the undifferentiated state. This ES cell line allowed us to study the role of differentiation to neural cells with RA and enabled us to compare ES cell differentiation in the context of supplementation with RA or FGF2 in culture. To this end, we established a novel cynomolgus monkey cell line derived from ES cells and maintained it in an undifferentiated state in the absence of FGF2 supplementation.     

Ret is essential to mediate GDNF's neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effect in a Parkinson disease mouse model

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potent survival and regeneration-promoting factor for dopaminergic neurons in cell and animal models of Parkinson disease (PD). GDNF is currently tested in clinical trials on PD patients with so far inconclusive results. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ret is the canonical GDNF receptor, but several alternative GDNF receptors have been proposed, raising the question of which signaling receptor mediates here the beneficial GDNF effects. To address this question we overexpressed GDNF in the striatum of mice deficient for Ret in dopaminergic neurons and subsequently challenged these mice with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Strikingly, in this established PD mouse model, the absence of Ret completely abolished GDNF''s neuroprotective and regenerative effect on the midbrain dopaminergic system. This establishes Ret signaling as absolutely required for GDNF''s effects to prevent and compensate dopaminergic system degeneration and suggests Ret activation as the primary target of GDNF therapy in PD.Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is the founding member of the four ligands in the GDNF family, which belong to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily.¹ GDNF was characterized as a potent survival factor for many neurons in culture such as dopaminergic, motor, sympathetic, parasympathetic, sensory and enteric neurons.^{1, 2} In addition, in dopaminergic neuron cultures GDNF stimulates neuronal differentiation, neurite outgrowth, synapse formation and dopamine release.^{1, 2}As degeneration of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) represents a major hallmark of Parkinson disease (PD), the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder, GDNF has raised considerable interest as a therapeutic molecule for the treatment of PD.^{3, 4, 5} PD affects >2% of individuals over the age of 60 years, but no curative treatment is available to date, mainly due to a lack of understanding disease etiology.^{6, 7, 8} Preclinical studies in the established 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rodent and primate models of PD demonstrated a substantial neuroprotection and regeneration effect by striatal provided GDNF or its close relative neurturin.^{3, 4, 9} However, clinical phase II trials on PD patients using GDNF or neurturin did so far not convincingly recapitulate their beneficial effects on the dopaminergic system in humans most likely due to technical problems and the selection of advanced PD patients.^{10, 11, 12, 13}GDNF signaling is highly complex as this neurotrophic factor can bind to a variety of receptors, thus being able to induce pleiotropic effects. GDNF efficiently binds to the GPI-linked GDNF family receptor α1 (GFRα1).^{1, 2} It has been shown that the GDNF/GFRα1 complex can activate not only the canonical GDNF receptor Ret, a receptor tyrosine kinase which signals through the sarcoma protein (Src)/rat sarcoma (Ras)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, NF-κB (nuclear factor ''kappa-light-chain-enhancer'' of activated B cells), JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinases) and PLCγ (phospholipase γ) pathway, but also with other signaling inducing receptors.^{1, 2, 4, 5, 13} So far, at least four alternative GDNF receptors have been described which are all expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons, NCAM,^{14, 15} the integrins αV and βI,^{14, 16} syndecan 3¹⁷ and N-cadherin.¹⁸ Interestingly, Ret is not essential during pre- and postnatal development of the mouse dopaminergic system,^{19, 20, 21, 22, 23} but specifically required for the maintenance of SNpc dopaminergic neurons and their striatal innervation in aged mice.^{23, 24, 25} In contrast, GDNF seems most likely under physiological conditions to be dispensable during development and maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in mice, although conflicting results exist.^{26, 27, 28} Thus, Ret might be activated by a GDNF-independent mechanism to stimulate SNpc dopaminergic neuron survival. In addition, the in vivo function of the alternative GDNF receptors in the dopaminergic system under physiological and pathophysiological conditions, like PD, and their dependence on GDNF has not yet been addressed in detail. This raised the important question which GDNF receptor might be required to mediate GDNF''s reported neuroprotective and regenerative effect in the dopaminergic system in PD animal models and potentially in PD patients.^{5, 29}Previously, we showed in dopaminergic neuron-specific Ret knockout mice that Ret receptor loss does not result in a higher vulnerability of midbrain dopaminergic neurons against MPTP but to less resprouting of left over dopaminergic neuron axons in the striatum after MPTP intoxication.³⁰ In adult mice endogenous GDNF levels are rather low.^{26, 31} Therefore, we could not rule out in that study the possibility, that higher levels of GDNF—as also used in the clinical GDNF trials in PD patients—might have neuroprotective and regenerating effects even in the absence of the Ret receptor. Here we addressed now this question by viral overexpression of GDNF in MPTP-treated mice lacking expression of Ret again specifically in dopaminergic neurons.^{23, 30} We found that in the absence of Ret in dopaminergic neurons even a substantial overexpression of GDNF in the striatum does not have a neuroprotective and regenerative effect. Thus, despite the expression of alternative GDNF receptors on midbrain dopaminergic neurons, the presence of the canonical GDNF receptor Ret seems to be mandatory for mediating GDNF''s beneficial survival and axonal resprouting effect in these neurons.