Focus: 50 Years of DNA Repair: The Yale Symposium Reports: The Awakening of DNA Repair at Yale

As a graduate student with Professor Richard Setlow at Yale in the late 1950s, I studied the effects of ultraviolet and visible light on the syntheses of DNA, RNA, and protein in bacteria. I reflect upon my research in the Yale Biophysics Department, my subsequent postdoctoral experiences, and the eventual analyses in the laboratories of Setlow, Paul Howard-Flanders, and myself that constituted the discovery of the ubiquitous pathway of DNA excision repair in the early 1960s. I then offer a brief perspective on a few more recent developments in the burgeoning DNA repair field and their relationships to human disease.     

DNA修复的表观遗传学调控

表观遗传学信息的改变是导致人类肿瘤形成的重要因素之一．基因组的稳定性经常会受到DNA损伤的威胁．然而,高度致密的染色质结构却极大地妨碍了DNA修复的进行．因此,真核生物细胞中必须有一个精确的机制来克服染色质这一天然的屏障．其中,组蛋白的共价修饰和ATP-依赖的染色质重塑通过改变染色质的结构,对DNA修复进程起着关键的调控作用．介绍了DNA修复过程中,发生在表观遗传学方面的主要调控过程,特别阐述了在DNA双链断裂损伤应答和修复过程中,组蛋白修饰和染色质重塑方面最新的研究进展,并对今后的发展方向进行了讨论．     

抗辐射菌中DNA损伤修复主要基因群的研究进展

抗辐射红色球菌对电离辐射具有很高的放射线抵抗性,该菌具有惊人的DNA的二条链切断的修复能力,由辐射等引起的切断损伤DNA在几至十几小时内能高效正确地进行完全修复。在对切断的双链DNA进行修复时,除了大肠杆菌等生物在切断的双链DNA修复时出现的蛋白质以外,还有该菌所特有的修复蛋白质也参与修复。本文对该菌所特有的DNA二条链的切断损伤修复的主要基因及其相互作用进行了简要介绍。     

DNA Repair Mechanisms and the Bypass of DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA repair mechanisms are critical for maintaining the integrity of genomic DNA, and their loss is associated with cancer predisposition syndromes. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have played a central role in elucidating the highly conserved mechanisms that promote eukaryotic genome stability. This review will focus on repair mechanisms that involve excision of a single strand from duplex DNA with the intact, complementary strand serving as a template to fill the resulting gap. These mechanisms are of two general types: those that remove damage from DNA and those that repair errors made during DNA synthesis. The major DNA-damage repair pathways are base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair, which, in the most simple terms, are distinguished by the extent of single-strand DNA removed together with the lesion. Mistakes made by DNA polymerases are corrected by the mismatch repair pathway, which also corrects mismatches generated when single strands of non-identical duplexes are exchanged during homologous recombination. In addition to the true repair pathways, the postreplication repair pathway allows lesions or structural aberrations that block replicative DNA polymerases to be tolerated. There are two bypass mechanisms: an error-free mechanism that involves a switch to an undamaged template for synthesis past the lesion and an error-prone mechanism that utilizes specialized translesion synthesis DNA polymerases to directly synthesize DNA across the lesion. A high level of functional redundancy exists among the pathways that deal with lesions, which minimizes the detrimental effects of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage.     

Focus: 50 Years of DNA Repair: The Yale Symposium Reports: Hypoxia and DNA Repair

Hypoxia is a characteristic feature of solid tumors and occurs very early in neoplastic development. Hypoxia transforms cell physiology in multiple ways, with profound changes in cell metabolism, cell growth, susceptibility to apoptosis, induction of angiogenesis, and increased motility. Over the past 20 years, our lab has determined that hypoxia also induces genetic instability. We have conducted a large series of experiments revealing that this instability occurs through the alteration of DNA repair pathways, including nucleotide excision repair, DNA mismatch repair, and homology dependent repair. Our work suggests that hypoxia, as a key component of solid tumors, can drive cancer progression through its impact on genomic integrity. However, the acquired changes in DNA repair that are induced by hypoxia may also render hypoxic cancer cells vulnerable to tailored strategies designed to exploit these changes.     

Focus: 50 Years of DNA Repair: The Yale Symposium Reports: Investigations of Homologous Recombination Pathways and Their Regulation

The DNA double-strand break (DSB), arising from exposure to ionizing radiation or various chemotherapeutic agents or from replication fork collapse, is among the most dangerous of chromosomal lesions. DSBs are highly cytotoxic and can lead to translocations, deletions, duplications, or mutations if mishandled. DSBs are eliminated by either homologous recombination (HR), which uses a homologous template to guide accurate repair, or by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which simply rejoins the two broken ends after damaged nucleotides have been removed. HR generates error-free repair products and is also required for generating chromosome arm crossovers between homologous chromosomes in meiotic cells. The HR reaction includes several distinct steps: resection of DNA ends, homologous DNA pairing, DNA synthesis, and processing of HR intermediates. Each occurs in a highly regulated fashion utilizing multiple protein factors. These steps are being elucidated using a combination of genetic tools, cell-based assays, and in vitro reconstitution with highly purified HR proteins. In this review, we summarize contributions from our laboratory at Yale University in understanding HR mechanisms in eukaryotic cells.     

Unraveling DNA Repair in Human: Molecular Mechanisms and Consequences of Repair Defect

Cellular genomes are vulnerable to an array of DNA-damaging agents, of both endogenous and environmental origin. Such damage occurs at a frequency too high to be compatible with life. As a result cell death and tissue degeneration, aging and cancer are caused. To avoid this and in order for the genome to be reproduced, these damages must be corrected efficiently by DNA repair mechanisms. Eukaryotic cells have multiple mechanisms for the repair of damaged DNA. These repair systems in humans protect the genome by repairing modified bases, DNA adducts, crosslinks and double-strand breaks. The lesions in DNA are eliminated by mechanisms such as direct reversal, base excision and nucleotide excision. The base excision repair eliminates single damaged-base residues by the action of specialized DNA glycosylases and AP endonucleases. Nucleotide excision repair excises damage within oligomers that are 25 to 32 nucleotides long. This repair utilizes many proteins to remove the major UV-induced photoproducts from DNA, as well as other types of modified nucleotides. Different DNA polymerases and ligases are utilized to complete the separate pathways. The double-strand breaks in DNA are repaired by mechanisms that involve DNA protein kinase and recombination proteins. The defect in one of the repair protein results in three rare recessive syndromes: xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy. This review describes the biochemistry of various repair processes and summarizes the clinical features and molecular mechanisms underlying these disorders.     

Focus: 50 Years of DNA Repair: The Yale Symposium Reports: Triplex-Induced DNA Damage Response

Cellular DNA damage response is critical to preserving genomic integrity following exposure to genotoxic stress. A complex series of networks and signaling pathways become activated after DNA damage and trigger the appropriate cellular response, including cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis. The response elicited is dependent upon the type and extent of damage sustained, with the ultimate goal of preventing propagation of the damaged DNA. A major focus of our studies is to determine the cellular pathways involved in processing damage induced by altered helical structures, specifically triplexes. Our lab has demonstrated that the TFIIH factor XPD occupies a central role in triggering apoptosis in response to triplex-induced DNA strand breaks. We have shown that XPD co-localizes with γH2AX, and its presence is required for the phosphorylation of H2AX tyrosine142, which stimulates the signaling pathway to recruit pro-apoptotic factors to the damage site. Herein, we examine the cellular pathways activated in response to triplex formation and discuss our finding that suggests that XPD-dependent apoptosis plays a role in preserving genomic integrity in the presence of excessive structurally induced DNA damage.     

Focus: 50 Years of DNA Repair: The Yale Symposium Reports: BRCA2: One Small Step for DNA Repair,One Giant Protein Purified

DNA damage, malfunctions in DNA repair, and genomic instability are processes that intersect at the crossroads of carcinogenesis. Underscoring the importance of DNA repair in breast and ovarian tumorigenesis is the familial inherited cancer predisposition gene BRCA2. The role of BRCA2 in DNA double-strand break repair was first revealed based on its interaction with RAD51, a central player in homologous recombination. The RAD51 protein forms a nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA, invades a DNA duplex, and initiates a search for homology. Once a homologous DNA sequence is found, the DNA is used as a template for the high-fidelity repair of the DNA break. Many of the biochemical features that allow BRCA2 to choreograph the activities of RAD51 have been elucidated and include: targeting RAD51 to single-stranded DNA while inhibiting binding to dsDNA, reducing the ATPase activity of RAD51, and facilitating the displacement of the single-strand DNA binding protein, Replication Protein A. These reinforcing activities of BRCA2 culminate in the correct positioning of RAD51 onto a processed DNA double-strand break and initiate its faithful repair by homologous recombination. In this review, I will address current biochemical data concerning the BRCA2 protein and highlight unanswered questions regarding BRCA2 function in homologous recombination and cancer.     

衰老过程中大白鼠脾细胞的DNA单链断裂与重接能力的变化

 DNA被紫外线损伤后,由DNA切除修复酶切除嘧啶二聚体,随之以另一条正常的DNA链为模板修复合成DNA片段,最后由DNA连接酶将新合成的DNA片与原有的DNA链连接。本文用荧光法测定DNA修复过程中DNA单链的断裂及重接能力与衰老的关系。结果表明,不同年龄大鼠脾细胞均具有修复DNA单链断裂的能力,DNA单链断裂重接的能力与年龄有相关性,断乳鼠及青年鼠的脾细胞当保温至30min时,即开始了DNA链的重接,保温90min后则恢复到原有水平;而老年鼠脾细胞保温至90min时才开始DNA链的重接,保温150min,尚未恢复到原有水平。还发现,断乳鼠及老年鼠脾细胞的单链DNA含量高于青年鼠。     

γ -Ray-Induced DNA Damage and Repair in Methanosarcina barkeri

The capacity of the mesophilic archaeon, Methanosarcina barkeri (DSM 804) for DNA double strand break repair following⁶⁰Co- γ irradiation was investigated. The genome (1.9 Mb) of Methanosarcina barkeri was largely fragmented and was found to be repaired on incubation in medium under anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 4 h. To get an insight into its repair process a set of inhibitors were used. The methanogenesis inhibitor, bromoethanesulfonate showed partial inhibition of repair in Methanosarcina barkeri but not in Escherichia coli or human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The Methanosarcina barkeri cells could also partially repair the DNA damage in a non-nutrient medium. Arabinosine-CTP, a nucleoside analogue and a polymerase inhibitor, completely inhibited repair in this archaeon. Arabinosine-CTP did not affect DSB (double-strand break) repair in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells but completely inhibited repair in Escherichia coli (a bacterium). The involvement of polymerase indicates recombination to be the underlying mechanism in DSB repair of Methanosarcina barkeri. 3-Aminobenzamide, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, completely inhibited repair in this archaeon as well as in eukarya but not in Escherichia coli showing the involvement of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in the DSB repair of Methanosarcina barkeri.     

My Journey to DNA Repair

I completed my medical studies at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm but have always been devoted to basic research. My longstanding interest is to understand fundamental DNA repair mechanisms in the fields of cancer therapy, inherited human genetic disorders and ancient DNA. I initially measured DNA decay, including rates of base loss and cytosine deamination. I have discovered several important DNA repair proteins and determined their mechanisms of action. The discovery of uracil-DNA glycosylase defined a new category of repair enzymes with each specialized for different types of DNA damage. The base excision repair pathway was first reconstituted with human proteins in my group. Cell-free analysis for mammalian nucleotide excision repair of DNA was also developed in my laboratory. I found multiple distinct DNA ligases in mammalian cells, and led the first genetic and biochemical work on DNA ligases Ⅰ, and Ⅳ. I discovered the mammalian exonucleases DNase Ⅲ (TREX1) and IV (FEN1). Interestingly, expression of TREX1 was altered in some human autoimmune diseases. I also showed that the mutagenic DNA adduct O6-methylguanine (O6 mG) is repaired without removing the guanine from DNA, identifying a surprising mechanism by which the methyl group is transferred to a residue in the repair protein itself. A further novel process of DNA repair discovered by my research group is the action of AlkB as an iron-dependent enzyme carrying out oxidative demethylation.     

CRISPR with a Happy Ending: Non‐Templated DNA Repair for Prokaryotic Genome Engineering

The exploration of microbial metabolism is expected to support the development of a sustainable economy and tackle several problems related to the burdens of human consumption. Microorganisms have the potential to catalyze processes that are currently unavailable, unsustainable and/or inefficient. Their metabolism can be optimized and further expanded using tools like the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and their associated proteins (CRISPR‐Cas) systems. These tools have revolutionized the field of biotechnology, as they greatly streamline the genetic engineering of organisms from all domains of life. CRISPR‐Cas and other nucleases mediate double‐strand DNA breaks, which must be repaired to prevent cell death. In prokaryotes, these breaks can be repaired through either homologous recombination, when a DNA repair template is available, or through template‐independent end joining, of which two major pathways are known. These end joining pathways depend on different sets of proteins and mediate DNA repair with different outcomes. Understanding these DNA repair pathways can be advantageous to steer the results of genome engineering experiments. In this review, we discuss different strategies for the genetic engineering of prokaryotes through either non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) or alternative end joining (AEJ), both of which are independent of exogenous DNA repair templates.     

Repair of tandem base lesions in DNA by human cell extracts generates persisting single-strand breaks

Clustered DNA damage, where two or more lesions are located proximal to each other on the same or opposite DNA strands, is frequently produced as a result of exposure to ionising radiation. It has been suggested that such complex damaged sites pose problems for repair pathways. In this study, we addressed the question of how two 8-oxoguanine lesions, located two nucleotides apart on the same DNA strand, are repaired. We find that in human cell extracts repair of either of the 8-oxoguanine lesions within a tandem damaged site is initiated randomly and that the majority of the initiated repair proceeds to completion. However, a fraction of the initiated repair is delayed at the stage of an incised AP site and the rate of further processing of this incised AP site is dependent on the position of the remaining 8-oxoguanine. If the remaining 8-oxoguanine residue is located near the 5' terminus of the incised abasic site, repair continues as efficiently as repair of a single 8-oxoguanine residue. However, repair is delayed after the incision step when the remaining 8-oxoguanine residue is located near the 3' terminus. Although the presence of the 8-oxoguanine residue near the 3' terminus did not affect either DNA polymerase beta activity or poly(ADP)ribose polymerase-1 affinity and turnover on an incised AP site, we find that 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase has reduced ability to remove an 8-oxoguanine residue located near the 3' terminus of the incised AP site. We find that binding of the 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase to this 8-oxoguanine residue inhibits DNA repair synthesis by DNA polymerase beta, thus delaying repair. We propose that interference between a DNA glycosylase and DNA polymerase during the repair of tandem lesions may lead to accumulation of the intermediate products that contain persisting DNA strand breaks.     

Lambda Red Mediated Gap Repair Utilizes a Novel Replicative Intermediate in Escherichia coli

The lambda phage Red recombination system can mediate efficient homologous recombination in Escherichia coli, which is the basis of the DNA engineering technique termed recombineering. Red mediated insertion of DNA requires DNA replication, involves a single-stranded DNA intermediate and is more efficient on the lagging strand of the replication fork. Lagging strand recombination has also been postulated to explain the Red mediated repair of gapped plasmids by an Okazaki fragment gap filling model. Here, we demonstrate that gap repair involves a different strand independent mechanism. Gap repair assays examining the strand asymmetry of recombination did not show a lagging strand bias. Directly testing an ssDNA plasmid showed lagging strand recombination is possible but dsDNA plasmids did not employ this mechanism. Insertional recombination combined with gap repair also did not demonstrate preferential lagging strand bias, supporting a different gap repair mechanism. The predominant recombination route involved concerted insertion and subcloning though other routes also operated at lower frequencies. Simultaneous insertion of DNA resulted in modification of both strands and was unaffected by mutations to DNA polymerase I, responsible for Okazaki fragment maturation. The lower efficiency of an alternate Red mediated ends-in recombination pathway and the apparent lack of a Holliday junction intermediate suggested that gap repair does not involve a different Red recombination pathway. Our results may be explained by a novel replicative intermediate in gap repair that does not involve a replication fork. We exploited these observations by developing a new recombineering application based on concerted insertion and gap repair, termed SPI (subcloning plus insertion). SPI selected against empty vector background and selected for correct gap repair recombinants. We used SPI to simultaneously insert up to four different gene cassettes in a single recombineering reaction. Consequently, our findings have important implications for the understanding of E. coli replication and Red recombination.     

Focus: 50 Years of DNA Repair: The Yale Symposium Reports: Fanconi Anemia: A Signal Transduction and DNA Repair Pathway

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a fascinating, rare genetic disorder marked by congenital defects, bone marrow failure, and cancer susceptibility. Research in recent years has led to the elucidation of FA as a DNA repair disorder and involved multiple pathways as well as having wide applicability to common cancers, including breast, ovarian, and head and neck. This review will describe the clinical aspects of FA as well as the current state of its molecular pathophysiology. In particular, work from the Kupfer laboratory will be described that demonstrates how the FA pathway interacts with multiple DNA repair pathways, including the mismatch repair system and signal transduction pathway of the DNA damage response.     

Hierarchies of DNA repair in mammalian cells: biological consequences

Mammalian cells exposed to genotoxic agents exhibit heterogeneous levels of repair of certain types of DNA damage in various genomic regions. For UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers we propose that at least three levels of repair exist: (1) slow repair of inactive (X-chromosomal) genes, (2) fast repair of active housekeeping genes, and (3) accelerated repair of the transcribed strand of active genes. These hierarchies of repair may be related to chromosomal banding patterns as obtained by Giemsa staining. The possible consequences of defective DNA repair in one or more of these levels may be manifested in different clinical features associated with UV-sensitive human syndromes. Moreover, molecular analysis of hprt mutations reveals that mutations are primarily generated by DNA damage in the poorly repaired non-transcribed strand of the gene.     

水分胁迫引起的两种不同生态型芦苇的DNA损伤与修复

利用DNA解链荧光分析（FADU）法检测两种不同生态型芦苇（Phragmites communis T.)在PEG6000胁迫处理后的DNA损伤。结果表明：无论是20％还是30％PEG6000胁迫处理,耐旱性强的沙丘芦苇的DNA损伤都比耐旱性弱的沼泽芦苇较轻。利用不同浓度的二乙基二硫代谢氨基甲酸钠（DDC）、H2O2、FeSO4以增加芦苇的3种活性氧（O2^-、H2O2、OH）的实验也同样显示出沙丘芦苇抵抗水分胁迫引起的DNA损伤的能力较强。同时,当加入外源活性氧清除剂二甲基亚砜（DMSO）、抗坏血酸（Vc）时,水分胁迫处理的芦苇DNA损伤表现出不同程度的减轻。当PEG胁迫处理的芦苇复水后,DNA损伤随复水时间延长而逐渐减轻,但沙丘芦苇的DNA损伤修复较快而完全。实验初步证明：水分胁迫可引起植物体内DNA损伤且该损伤与活性氧有关,植物的抗旱性与DNA损伤及修复密切相关。     

DNA损伤修复机制——解读2015年诺贝尔化学奖

Tomas Lindahl, Paul Modrich和Aziz Sancar三位科学家因发现“DNA损伤修复机制”获得了2015年诺贝尔化学奖．Lindahl首次发现Escherichia Coli中参与碱基切除修复的第一个蛋白质--尿嘧啶 DNA糖基化酶（UNG）; Modrich重建了错配修复的体外系统,从大肠杆菌到哺乳动物深入探究了错配修复的机制; Sancar利用纯化的UvrA、UvrB、UvrC重建了核苷酸切除修复的关键步骤,阐述了核苷酸切除修复的分子机制．DNA损伤是由生物所处体外环境和体内因素共同导致的,面对不同种类的损伤,机体启动多种不同的修复机制修复损伤,保护基因组稳定性．这些修复机制包括：光修复(light repairing);核苷酸切除修复（nucleotide excision repair, NER）;碱基切除修复（base excision repair, BER）;错配修复（mismatch repair, MMR）;以及DNA双链断裂修复（DNA double strand breaks repair, DSBR）．其中DNA双链断裂修复又分同源重组（homologous recombination, HR）和非同源末端连接（non homologous end joining, NHEJ）两种方式．本文将对上述几种修复的机制进行总结与讨论．