From Nuremberg to the ethics committees in human experimentation

During the Nuremberg trials, the accusation prompted the creation of an ad hoc committee to advise on human experiments carried out on prisoners during wartime in the USA. Precisely a charge that had been brought against Karl Brandt and his colleagues. This committee was the forerunner of the Independent Committees, to which the Declaration of Helsinki assigned a role in analysing the ethics of research projects in humans. From 1980 onwards, in industrialised countries, the legislation regarding clinical trials began to incorporate similar structures, IRBs in the United States of America, Ethics Committees elsewhere, and the 'Committee for the Protection of Persons" in France. However, at that time, in spite of the misleading words, we went from ethics to law, from rules of conduct intended for researchers to legal regulations organising relations between sponsors, investigators and persons participating in biomedical research, which is not the same thing.     

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider

ABSTRACT: Selection of appropriate outcomes or domains is crucial when designing clinical trials to compare directly the effects of different interventions in ways that minimise bias. If the findings are to influence policy and practice then the chosen outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public, health care professionals and others making decisions about health care. There is a growing recognition that insufficient attention has been paid to the outcomes measured in clinical trials. These issues could be addressed through the development and use of an agreed standardised collection of outcomes, known as a core outcome set, which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area. Accumulating work in this area has identified the need for general guidance on the development of core outcome sets. Key issues to consider in the development of a core outcome set include its scope, the stakeholder groups to be involved, choice of consensus method and the achievement of a consensus.     

Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees.

A survey of ethics committees in district health authorities was carried out to find out the size and make up of committees and what information and guidance they offered to scientists who apply to do research. A sample (n = 28) of committees in England (n = 190), half from teaching districts and half from non-teaching districts, was contacted by post requesting this information. A high degree of diversity was found, not only in the methods that committees used but also in the ethical criteria each considered to be pertinent for research. It was also shown that published guidelines have made little impact. It is suggested that issuing more guidelines will be of limited use. Rather, the following are needed: information about why guidelines have been widely ignored, better communication between committees, some form of education for committee members, and a formal register of committees compiled.     

Identity and the ethics of gene therapy

Some conditions detrimental to human well-being, such as sickle-cell anaemia, cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, Lesch-Nyhan disease and various immunodeficiencies, are genetically determined. One potential means of preventing the development of such conditions is the manipulation of genetic material in the conceptus of an organism which would otherwise develop such conditions. Genetic manipulations could take the form either of excising and substituting genetic material, excising but not substituting genetic material, adding but not excising genetic material or reorganizing existing genetic material. To succeed, manipulation would have to change genetic structure so as to change its informational content. It might be thought, however, that all or some such manipulations would involve causing particular individuals to cease to exist and involve bringing into existence new, distinct individuals. Gene therapy could not, therefore, be a procedure which improved the circumstances of the particular individual to whom it is applied. It might be suggested that once the metaphysics of identity and the facts of gene therapy are understood, certain interesting conclusions concerning the ethics of gene therapy emerge. Some such conclusions have been discussed in this journal by Noam J. Zohar and Jeffrey P. Kahn. More, however, needs to be said about them since neither Zohar nor Kahn draws the correct conclusions. While both have pertinent things to say, neither has given a completely clear account of the metaphysics of gene therapy and so neither has completely traced out the implication of the metaphysics for the ethics of gene therapy. This paper attempts to remedy these defects.     

The ethics of human gene transfer

Almost 20 years since the first gene-transfer trial was carried out in humans, the field has made significant advances towards clinical application. Nevertheless, it continues to face numerous unresolved ethical challenges--among them are the question of when to initiate human testing, the acceptability of germline modification and whether the technique should be applied to the enhancement of traits. Although such issues have precedents in other medical contexts, they take on a different character in gene transfer, in part because of the scientific uncertainty and the social context of innovation.     

Clinical trials of gene therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update on clinical trials of gene therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease published since 1 August 2001 and summarize the general advantages and potential problems of gene transfer in these disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: There are two major areas in which gene therapy has entered clinical trials. The first is angiogenesis for coronary and peripheral arterial disease. Two relatively small placebo-controlled trials for coronary disease were reported, one using intramyocardial plasmid VEGF-2 gene, the other using intracoronary adenoviral FGF-4 gene. The VEGF-2 study in no-option patients showed reduced angina, and significant improvement in perfusion and function, whereas the FGF-4 study in less severely affected patients showed promising results in some subsets. In peripheral artery disease two phase 1 studies of adenoviral NV1FGF and VEGF showed some objective improvement in pain, ulcer size and ankle:brachial index in one study and endothelial function in the other. Both adenoviral and plasmid VEGF gene transfer at angioplasty increased vascularity in a phase 2 double-blind study. The other major area is the prevention of graft disease and restenosis using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. E2F decoy led to a significant reduction in venous graft complications after ex-vivo transfection at the time of coronary bypass surgery, whereas the c-Myc oligodeoxynucleotide was ineffective in preventing in-stent coronary restenosis. SUMMARY: There are more reviews of gene therapy for atherosclerosis in the literature than publications with original data or trials, but in the past year the imbalance is being redressed, with some promising results from controlled studies.