ClpS, a substrate modulator of the ClpAP machine

In the bacterial cytosol, ATP-dependent protein degradation is performed by several different chaperone-protease pairs, including ClpAP. The mechanism by which these machines specifically recognize substrates remains unclear. Here, we report the identification of a ClpA cofactor from Escherichia coli, ClpS, which directly influences the ClpAP machine by binding to the N-terminal domain of the chaperone ClpA. The degradation of ClpAP substrates, both SsrA-tagged proteins and ClpA itself, is specifically inhibited by ClpS. In contrast, ClpS enhanced ClpA recognition of two heat-aggregated proteins in vitro and, consequently, the ClpAP-mediated disaggregation and degradation of these substrates. We conclude that ClpS modifies ClpA substrate specificity, potentially redirecting degradation by ClpAP toward aggregated proteins.     

Binding and degradation of heterodimeric substrates by ClpAP and ClpXP

ClpA and ClpX function both as molecular chaperones and as the regulatory components of ClpAP and ClpXP proteases, respectively. ClpA and ClpX bind substrate proteins through specific recognition signals, catalyze ATP-dependent protein unfolding of the substrate, and when in complexes with ClpP translocate the unfolded polypeptide into the cavity of the ClpP peptidase for degradation. To examine the mechanism of interaction of ClpAP with dimeric substrates, single round binding and degradation experiments were performed, revealing that ClpAP degraded both subunits of a RepA homodimer in one cycle of binding. Furthermore, ClpAP was able to degrade both protomers of a RepA heterodimer in which only one subunit contained the ClpA recognition signal. In contrast, ClpXP degraded both subunits of a dimeric substrate only when both protomers contained a recognition signal. These data suggest that ClpAP and ClpXP may recognize and bind substrates in significantly different ways.     

Examination of the nucleotide‐linked assembly mechanism of E. coli ClpA

Escherichia coli ClpA is a AAA+ (ATPase Associated with diverse cellular Activities) chaperone that catalyzes the ATP‐dependent unfolding and translocation of substrate proteins targeted for degradation by a protease, ClpP. ClpA hexamers associate with one or both ends of ClpP tetradecamers to form ClpAP complexes. Each ClpA protomer contains two nucleotide‐binding sites, NBD1 and NBD2, and self‐assembly into hexamers is thermodynamically linked to nucleotide binding. Despite a number of studies aimed at characterizing ClpA and ClpAP‐catalyzed substrate unfolding and degradation, respectively, to date the field is unable to quantify the concentration of ClpA hexamers available to interact with ClpP for any given nucleotide and total ClpA concentration. In this work, sedimentation velocity studies are used to quantitatively examine the self‐assembly of a ClpA Walker B variant in the presence of ATP. In addition to the hexamerization, we observe the formation of a previously unreported ClpA dodecamer in the presence of ATP. Further, we report apparent equilibrium constants for the formation of each ClpA oligomer obtained from direct boundary modeling of the sedimentation velocity data. The energetics of nucleotide binding to NBD1 and NBD2 are revealed by examining the dependence of the apparent association equilibrium constants on free nucleotide concentration.     

An intrinsic degradation tag on the ClpA C-terminus regulates the balance of ClpAP complexes with different substrate specificity

ATP-dependent protein degradation in bacteria is carried out by barrel-shaped proteases architecturally related to the proteasome. In Escherichia coli, ClpP interacts with two alternative ATPases, ClpA or ClpX, to form active protease complexes. ClpAP and ClpXP show different but overlapping substrate specificities. ClpXP is considered the primary recipient of ssrA-tagged substrates while ClpAP in complex with ClpS processes N-end rule substrates. Notably, in its free form, but not in complex with ClpS, ClpAP also degrades ssrA-tagged substrates and its own chaperone component, ClpA. To reveal the mechanism of ClpAP-mediated ClpA degradation, termed autodegradation, and its possible role in regulating ClpAP levels, we dissected ClpA to show that the flexible C-terminus of the second AAA module serves as the degradation signal. We demonstrate that ClpA becomes largely resistant to autodegradation in the absence of its C-terminus and, conversely, transfer of the last 11 residues of ClpA to the C-terminus of green fluorescent protein (GFP) renders GFP a substrate of ClpAP. This autodegradation tag bears similarity to the ssrA-tag in its degradation behavior, displaying similar catalytic turnover rates when coupled to GFP but a twofold lower apparent affinity constant compared to ssrA-tagged GFP. We show that, in analogy to the prevention of ssrA-mediated recognition, the adaptor ClpS inhibits autodegradation by a specificity switch as opposed to direct masking of the degradation signal. Our results demonstrate that in the presence of ssrA-tagged substrates, ClpA autodegradation will be competitively reduced. This simple mechanism allows for dynamic reallocation of free ClpAP versus ClpAPS in response to the presence of ssrA-tagged substrates.     

ClpA and ClpP remain associated during multiple rounds of ATP-dependent protein degradation by ClpAP protease.

The Escherichia coli ClpA and ClpP proteins form a complex, ClpAP, that catalyzes ATP-dependent degradation of proteins. Formation of stable ClpA hexamers and stable ClpAP complexes requires binding of ATP or nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues to ClpA. To understand the order of events during substrate binding, unfolding, and degradation by ClpAP, it is essential to know the oligomeric state of the enzyme during multiple catalytic cycles. Using inactive forms of ClpA or ClpP as traps for dissociated species, we measured the rates of dissociation of ClpA hexamers or ClpAP complexes. When ATP was saturating, the rate constant for dissociation of ClpA hexamers was 0.032 min(-1) (t(1/2) of 22 min) at 37 degrees C, and dissociation of ClpP from the ClpAP complexes occurred with a rate constant of 0. 092 min(-1) (t(1/2) of 7.5 min). Because the k(cat) for casein degradation is approximately 10 min(-1), these results indicate that tens of molecules of casein can be turned over by the ClpAP complex before significant dissociation occurs. Mutations in the N-terminal ATP binding site led to faster rates of ClpA and ClpAP dissociation, whereas mutations in the C-terminal ATP binding site, which cause significant decreases in ATPase activity, led to lower rates of dissociation of ClpA and ClpAP complexes. Dissociation rates for wild-type and first domain mutants of ClpA were faster at low nucleotide concentrations. The t(1/2) for dissociation of ClpAP complexes in the presence of nonhydrolyzable analogues was >/=30 min. Thus, ATP binding stabilizes the oligomeric state of ClpA, and cycles of ATP hydrolysis affect the dynamics of oligomer interaction. However, since the k(cat) for ATP hydrolysis is approximately 140 min(-1), ClpA and the ClpAP complex remain associated during hundreds of rounds of ATP hydrolysis. Our results indicate that the ClpAP complex is the functional form of the protease and as such engages in multiple rounds of interaction with substrate proteins, degradation, and release of peptide products without dissociation.     

ClpA and ClpX ATPases bind simultaneously to opposite ends of ClpP peptidase to form active hybrid complexes

The Escherichia coli ATP-dependent ClpAP and ClpXP proteases are composed of a single proteolytic component, ClpP, complexed with either of the two related chaperones, ClpA or ClpX. ClpXP and ClpAP complexes interact with different specific substrates and catalyze ATP-dependent protein unfolding and degradation. In vitro in the presence of ATP or ATPgammaS, ClpA and ClpX form homomeric rings of six subunits, which bind to one or both ends of the double heptameric rings of ClpP. We have observed that, when equimolar amounts of ClpA and ClpX hexamers are added to ClpP in vitro in the presence of ATP or ATPgammaS, hybrid complexes in which ClpX and ClpA are bound to opposite ends of the same ClpP are readily formed. The distribution of homomeric and heteromeric complexes was consistent with random binding of ClpA and ClpX to the ends of ClpP. Direct demonstration of the functionality of the heteromeric complexes was obtained by electron microscopy, which allowed us to visualize substrate translocation into proteolytically inactive ClpP chambers. Starting with hybrid complexes to which protein substrates specific to ClpX or ClpA were bound, translocation of both types of substrates was shown to occur without significant redistribution of ClpA or ClpX. The stoichiometric ratios of the ClpA, ClpX, and ClpP oligomeric complexes in vivo are consistent with the predominance of heteromeric complexes in growing cells. Thus, ClpXAP is a bifunctional protease whose two ends can independently target different classes of substrates.     

Cytoplasmic degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins

Degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins is a central feature of protein-quality control in all bacteria. In Escherichia coli, the ATP-dependent ClpXP and ClpAP proteases are thought to participate in this process, but their relative contributions to degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins in vivo have been uncertain because two adaptor proteins, ClpS and SspB, can modulate proteolysis of these substrates. Here, intracellular levels of these protease components and adaptors were determined during exponential growth and as cells entered early stationary phase. Levels of ClpA and ClpP increased about threefold during this transition, whereas ClpX, ClpS and SspB levels remained nearly constant. Using GFP-ssrA expressed from the chromosome as a degradation reporter, the effects of altered concentrations of different protease components or adaptor proteins were explored. Both ClpXP and ClpAP degraded GFP-ssrA in the cell, demonstrating that wild-type levels of SspB and ClpS do not inhibit ClpAP completely. Upon entry into stationary phase, increased levels of ClpAP resulted in increased degradation of ssrA-tagged substrates. As measured by maximum turnover rates, ClpXP degradation of GFP-ssrA in vivo was significantly more efficient than in vitro. Surprisingly, ClpX-dependent ClpP-independent degradation of GFP-ssrA was also observed. Thus, unfolding of this substrate by ClpX appears to enhance intracellular degradation by other proteases.     

ClpP hydrolyzes a protein substrate processively in the absence of the ClpA ATPase: mechanistic studies of ATP-independent proteolysis

ATP-dependent proteases are processive, meaning that they degrade full-length proteins into small peptide products without releasing large intermediates along the reaction pathway. In the case of the bacterial ATP-dependent protease ClpAP, ATP hydrolysis by the ClpA component has been proposed to be required for processive proteolysis of full-length protein substrates. We present here data showing that in the absence of the ATPase subunit ClpA, the protease subunit ClpP can degrade full-length protein substrates processively, albeit at a greatly reduced rate. Moreover, the size distribution of peptide products from a ClpP-catalyzed digest is remarkably similar to the size distribution of products from a ClpAP-catalyzed digest. The ClpAP- and ClpP-generated peptide product size distributions are fitted well by a sum of multiple underlying Gaussian peaks with means at integral multiples of approximately 900 Da (7-8 amino acids). Our results are consistent with a mechanism in which ClpP controls product sizes by alternating between translocation in steps of 7-8 (+/-2-3) amino acid residues and proteolysis. On the structural and molecular level, the step size may be controlled by the spacing between the ClpP active sites, and processivity may be achieved by coupling peptide bond hydrolysis to the binding and release of substrate and products in the protease chamber.     

Crystal structure of the heterodimeric complex of the adaptor,ClpS, with the N-domain of the AAA+ chaperone,ClpA

Substrate selectivity and proteolytic activity for the E. coli ATP-dependent protease, ClpAP, is modulated by an adaptor protein, ClpS. ClpS binds to ClpA, the regulatory component of the ClpAP complex. We report the crystal structure of ClpS in complex with the isolated N-terminal domain of ClpA in two different crystal forms at 2.3- and 3.3-A resolution. The ClpS structure forms an alpha/beta-sandwich and is topologically analogous to the C-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L7/L12. ClpS contacts two surfaces on the N-terminal domain in both crystal forms; the more extensive interface was shown to be favored in solution by protease protection experiments. The N-terminal 20 residues of ClpS are not visible in the crystal structures; the removal of the first 17 residues produces ClpSDeltaN, which binds to the ClpA N-domain but no longer inhibits ClpA activity. A zinc binding site involving two His and one Glu residue was identified crystallographically in the N-terminal domain of ClpA. In a model of ClpS bound to hexameric ClpA, ClpS is oriented with its N terminus directed toward the distal surface of ClpA, suggesting that the N-terminal region of ClpS may affect productive substrate interactions at the apical surface or substrate entry into the ClpA translocation channel.     

Degradation of L-glutamate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli: allosteric regulation of enzyme stability.

L-glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is stable in exponentially growing Escherichia coli cells but is degraded at a rate of 20-30% per hour in cells starved for either nitrogen or carbon. GDH degradation is energy-dependent, and mutations in ATP-dependent proteases, ClpAP or Lon lead to partial stabilization. Degradation is inhibited by chloramphenicol and is completely blocked in relA mutant cells, suggesting that ribosome-mediated signaling may facilitate GDH degradation. Purified GDH has a single tight site for NADPH binding. Binding of NADPH in the absence of other ligands leads to destabilization of the enzyme. NADPH-induced instability and sensitivity to proteolysis is reversed by tri- and dicarboxylic acids or nucleoside di- and triphosphates. GTP and ppGpp bind to GDH at an allosteric site and reverse the destabilizing effects of NADPH. Native GDH is resistant to degradation by several purified ATP-dependent proteases: ClpAP, ClpXP, Lon, and ClpYQ, but denatured GDH is degraded by ClpAP. Our results suggest that, in vivo, GDH is sensitized to proteases by loss of a stabilizing ligand or interaction with an destabilizing metabolite that accumulates in starving cells, and that any of several ATP-dependent proteases degrade the sensitized protein.     

ClpP: a structurally dynamic protease regulated by AAA+ proteins

Proteolysis is an important process for many aspects of bacterial physiology. Clp proteases carry out a large proportion of protein degradation in bacteria. These enzymes assemble in complexes that combine the protease ClpP and the unfoldase, ClpA or ClpX. ClpP oligomerizes as two stacked heptameric rings enclosing a central chamber containing the proteolytic sites. ClpX and ClpA assemble into hexameric rings that bind both axial surfaces of the ClpP tetradecamer forming a barrel-like complex. ClpP requires association with ClpA or ClpX to unfold and thread protein substrates through the axial pore into the inner chamber where degradation occurs. A gating mechanism regulated by the ATPase exists at the entry of the ClpP axial pore and involves the N-terminal regions of the ClpP protomers. These gating motifs are located at the axial regions of the tetradecamer but in most crystal structures they are not visible. We also lack structural information about the ClpAP or ClpXP complexes. Therefore, the structural details of how the axial gate in ClpP is regulated by the ATPases are unknown. Here, we review our current understanding of the conformational changes that ClpA or ClpX induce in ClpP to open the axial gate and increase substrate accessibility into the degradation chamber. Most of this knowledge comes from the recent crystal structures of ClpP in complex with acyldepsipeptides (ADEP) antibiotics. These small molecules are providing new insights into the gating mechanism of this protease because they imitate the interaction of ClpA/ClpX with ClpP and activate its protease activity.     

Crystal structure of ClpA,an Hsp100 chaperone and regulator of ClpAP protease

Escherichia coli ClpA, an Hsp100/Clp chaperone and an integral component of the ATP-dependent ClpAP protease, participates in regulatory protein degradation and the dissolution and degradation of protein aggregates. The crystal structure of the ClpA subunit reveals an N-terminal domain with pseudo-twofold symmetry and two AAA(+) modules (D1 and D2) each consisting of a large and a small sub-domain with ADP bound in the sub-domain junction. The N-terminal domain interacts with the D1 domain in a manner similar to adaptor-binding domains of other AAA(+) proteins. D1 and D2 are connected head-to-tail consistent with a cooperative and vectorial translocation of protein substrates. In a planar hexamer model of ClpA, built by assembling ClpA D1 and D2 into homohexameric rings of known structures of AAA(+) modules, the differences in D1-D1 and D2-D2 interfaces correlate with their respective contributions to hexamer stability and ATPase activity.     

The molecular chaperone, ClpA, has a single high affinity peptide binding site per hexamer

Substrate recognition by Clp chaperones is dependent on interactions with motifs composed of specific peptide sequences. We studied the binding of short motif-bearing peptides to ClpA, the chaperone component of the ATP-dependent ClpAP protease of Escherichia coli in the presence of ATPgammaS and Mg2+ at pH 7.5. Binding was measured by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) using the peptide, AANDENYALAA, which corresponds to the SsrA degradation motif found at the C terminus of abnormal nascent polypeptides in vivo. One SsrA peptide was bound per hexamer of ClpA with an association constant (K(A)) of 5 x 10(6) m(-1). Binding was also assayed by changes in fluorescence of an N-terminal dansylated SsrA peptide, which bound with the same stoichiometry of one per ClpA hexamer (K(A) approximately 1 x 10(7) m(-1)). Similar results were obtained when ATP was substituted for ATPgammaS at 6 degrees C. Two additional peptides, derived from the phage P1 RepA protein and the E. coli HemA protein, which bear different substrate motifs, were competitive inhibitors of SsrA binding and bound to ClpA hexamers with K(A)' > 3 x 10(7) m(-1). DNS-SsrA bound with only slightly reduced affinity to deletion mutants of ClpA missing either the N-terminal domain or the C-terminal nucleotide-binding domain, indicating that the binding site for SsrA lies within the N-terminal nucleotide-binding domain. Because only one protein at a time can be unfolded and translocated by ClpA hexamers, restricting the number of peptides initially bound should avoid nonproductive binding of substrates and aggregation of partially processed proteins.     

Crystallographic investigation of peptide binding sites in the N-domain of the ClpA chaperone

Escherichia coli ClpA, an Hsp100/Clp chaperone and an integral component of the ATP-dependent ClpAP protease, participates in the dissolution and degradation of regulatory proteins and protein aggregates. ClpA consists of three functional domains: an N-terminal domain and two ATPase domains, D1 and D2. The N-domain is attached to D1 by a mobile linker and is made up of two tightly bound, identically folded alpha-helical bundles related by a pseudo 2-fold symmetry. Between the halves of the pseudo-dimer is a large flexible acidic loop that becomes better ordered upon binding of the small adaptor protein, ClpS. We have identified a number of structural features in the N-domain, including a Zn(++) binding motif, several interfaces for binding to ClpS, and a prominent hydrophobic surface area that binds peptides in different configurations. These structural motifs may contribute to binding of protein or peptide substrates with weak affinity and broad specificity. Kinetic studies comparing wild-type ClpA to a mutant ClpA with its N-domain deleted show that the N-domains contribute to the binding of a non-specific protein substrate but not of a folded substrate with the specific SsrA recognition tag. A functional model is proposed in which the N-domains in ClpA function as tentacles to weakly hold on to proteins thereby enhancing local substrate concentration.     

Division of labor between the pore-1 loops of the D1 and D2 AAA+ rings coordinates substrate selectivity of the ClpAP protease

ClpAP, an ATP-dependent protease consisting of ClpA, a double-ring hexameric unfoldase of the ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities superfamily, and the ClpP peptidase, degrades damaged and unneeded proteins to support cellular proteostasis. ClpA recognizes many protein substrates directly, but it can also be regulated by an adapter, ClpS, that modifies ClpA’s substrate profile toward N-degron substrates. Conserved tyrosines in the 12 pore-1 loops lining the central channel of the stacked D1 and D2 rings of ClpA are critical for degradation, but the roles of these residues in individual steps during direct or adapter-mediated degradation are poorly understood. Using engineered ClpA hexamers with zero, three, or six pore-1 loop mutations in each ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities superfamily ring, we found that active D1 pore loops initiate productive engagement of substrates, whereas active D2 pore loops are most important for mediating the robust unfolding of stable native substrates. In complex with ClpS, active D1 pore loops are required to form a high affinity ClpA•ClpS•substrate complex, but D2 pore loops are needed to “tug on” and remodel ClpS to transfer the N-degron substrate to ClpA. Overall, we find that the pore-1 loop tyrosines in D1 are critical for direct substrate engagement, whereas ClpS-mediated substrate delivery requires unique contributions from both the D1 and D2 pore loops. In conclusion, our study illustrates how pore loop engagement, substrate capture, and powering of the unfolding/translocation steps are distributed between the two rings of ClpA, illuminating new mechanistic features that may be common to double-ring protein unfolding machines.     

The two-component, ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli. Purification, cloning, and mutational analysis of the ATP-binding component

The ATP-binding component (Component II, hereafter referred to as ClpA) of a two-component, ATP-dependent protease from Escherichia coli has been purified to homogeneity. ClpA is a protein with subunit Mr 81,000. It has an intrinsic ATPase activity and activates degradation of protein substrates only in the presence of a second component (Component I, hereafter referred to as ClpP), Mg2+, and ATP. The amount of ClpA varies by less than a factor of 2 in cells grown in different media and at temperatures from 30 to 42 degrees C. ClpA does not appear to be a heat-shock protein since its synthesis is not dependent on htpR. Antibodies against purified ClpA were used to identify lambda transducing phage bearing the clpA gene. The cloned gene contains a DNA sequence expected to code for the first 28 amino acids of ClpA, which were determined by protein sequencing of purified ClpA. The clpA gene in the phage was mutated by insertion of delta kan defective transposons and the mutations were transferred to E. coli by homologous recombination. The clpA gene was mapped to 19 min on the E. coli chromosome. Mutant cells with insertions early in the gene produce no ClpA protein detectable in Western blots, and extracts of such mutant cells have no detectable ClpA activity. clpA- mutants grow well under all conditions tested and are not defective in turnover of proteins during nitrogen starvation nor in the turnover of such highly unstable proteins as the lambda proteins O, N, and cII, or the E. coli proteins SulA, RcsA, and glutamate dehydrogenase. The degradation of abnormal canavanine-containing proteins is defective in clpA mutants especially in cells that also have a lon- mutation. Extracts of clpA- lon- cells have ATP-dependent casein degrading activity.     

Protein unfolding and degradation by the AAA+ Lon protease

AAA+ proteases employ a hexameric ring that harnesses the energy of ATP binding and hydrolysis to unfold native substrates and translocate the unfolded polypeptide into an interior compartment for degradation. What determines the ability of different AAA+ enzymes to unfold and thus degrade different native protein substrates is currently uncertain. Here, we explore the ability of the E. coli Lon protease to unfold and degrade model protein substrates beginning at N-terminal, C-terminal, or internal degrons. Lon has historically been viewed as a weak unfoldase, but we demonstrate robust and processive unfolding/degradation of some substrates with very stable protein domains, including mDHFR and titin(I27) . For some native substrates, Lon is a more active unfoldase than related AAA+ proteases, including ClpXP and ClpAP. For other substrates, this relationship is reversed. Thus, unfolding activity does not appear to be an intrinsic enzymatic property. Instead, it depends on the specific protease and substrate, suggesting that evolution has diversified rather than optimized the protein unfolding activities of different AAA+ proteases.     

Phylogenetic analysis predicts structural divergence for proteobacterial ClpC proteins

Regulated proteolysis is required in all organisms for the removal of misfolded or degradation-tagged protein substrates in cellular quality control pathways. The molecular machines that catalyze this process are known as ATP-dependent proteases with examples that include ClpAP and ClpCP. Clp/Hsp100 subunits form ring-structures that couple the energy of ATP binding and hydrolysis to protein unfolding and subsequent translocation of denatured protein into the compartmentalized ClpP protease for degradation. Copies of the clpA, clpC, clpE, clpK, and clpL genes are present in all characterized bacteria and their gene products are highly conserved in structure and function. However, the evolutionary relationship between these proteins remains unclear. Here we report a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis that suggests divergent evolution yielded ClpA from an ancestral ClpC protein and that ClpE/ClpL represent intermediates between ClpA/ClpC. This analysis also identifies a group of proteobacterial ClpC proteins that are likely not functional in regulated proteolysis. Our results strongly suggest that bacterial ClpC proteins should not be assumed to all function identically due to the structural differences identified here.     

The N-terminal substrate-binding domain of ClpA unfoldase is highly mobile and extends axially from the distal surface of ClpAP protease

ClpAP is a barrel-like complex consisting of hexameric rings of the ClpA ATPase stacked on the double heptameric ring of ClpP peptidase. ClpA has two AAA+ domains (Dl and D2) and a 153-residue N-domain. Substrate proteins bind to the distal surface of ClpA and are unfolded and translocated axially into ClpP. To gain insight into the functional architecture of ClpA in the ATPgammaS state, we have determined its structure at 12A resolution by cryo-electron microscopy. The resulting model has two tiers, corresponding to rings of Dl and D2 domains: oddly, there is no sign of the N-domains in the density map. However, they were detected as faint diffuse density distal to the Dl tier in a difference image between wild-type ClpAP and a mutant lacking the N-domain. This region is also accentuated in a variance map of ClpAP and in a difference imaging experiment with ClpAP complexed with ClpS, a 12kDa protein that binds to the N-domain. These observations demonstrate that the N-domains are highly mobile. From molecular modeling, we identify their median position and estimate that they undergo fluctuations of at least 30A. We discuss the implications of these observations for the role of N-domains in substrate binding: either they effect an initial transient binding, relaying substrate to a second site on the Dl tier where unfolding ensues, or they may serve as an entropic brush to clear the latter site of non-specifically bound ligands or substrates bound in non-productive complexes.     

Concurrent chaperone and protease activities of ClpAP and the requirement for the N-terminal ClpA ATP binding site for chaperone activity.

ClpA, a member of the Clp/Hsp100 family of ATPases, is both an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone and the regulatory component of ClpAP protease. We demonstrate that chaperone and protease activities occur concurrently in ClpAP complexes during a single round of RepA binding to ClpAP and ATP-dependent release. This result was substantiated with a ClpA mutant, ClpA(K220V), carrying an amino acid substitution in the N-terminal ATP binding site. ClpA(K220V) is unable to activate RepA, but the presence of ClpP or chemically inactivated ClpP restores its ability to activate RepA. The presence of ClpP simultaneously facilitates degradation of RepA. ClpP must remain bound to ClpA(K220V) for these effects, indicating that both chaperone and proteolytic activities of the mutant complex occur concurrently. ClpA(K220V) itself is able to form stable complexes with RepA in the presence of a poorly hydrolyzed ATP analog, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate), and to release RepA upon exchange of adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) with ATP. However, the released RepA is inactive in DNA binding, indicating that the N-terminal ATP binding site is essential for the chaperone activity of ClpA. Taken together, these results suggest that substrates bound to the complex of the proteolytic and ATPase components can be partitioned between release/reactivation and translocation/degradation.