Effect of sweetener type and of sweetener and acid levels on temporal perception of sweetness, sourness and fruitiness

Sweetness, sourness and fruitiness of 18 orange-flavored solutions,with three levels of citric acid (0.75, 1.5, 2.25 g/1) and threeequi-sweet levels of either sucrose (80, 100, 120 g/l) or aspartame(0.6, 0.7, 0.8 g/l), were evaluated by time–intensitymethodology. At these concentrations, a larger range in sournessintensity than in sweetness was produced, resulting in greatersuppression of sweetness by increasing acid levels than of sournessby increasing sweetener levels. Although aspartame samples hada longer duration of sweetness and fruitiness, sucrose and aspartamedid not interact differently with the sourness of citric acid.Fruitiness intensity and duration was enhanced by both sweetnessand sourness, but to a greater extent by sourness. Whether thisenhancement is attributable to a cognitive association of sweetnessor sourness with fruitiness or is due to the inability of thesubjects to separate sweet and sour tastes from orally perceivedfruity flavor cannot be concluded from this study.     

The effect of cooling the tongue on the perceived intensity of taste

Two experiments were performed (i) to measure the effect ofcooling on the perceived intensity of taste, and (ii) to determinewhether the temperature of the tongue or the temperature ofthe solution was primarily responsible for the changes in perceivedintensity that were observed. The first experiment revealedthat cooling both the tongue and the taste solutions from 36to either 28 or 20°C produced measurable reductions in theperceived intensity of the sweetness of sucrose and the bitternessof caffeine. The saltiness of NaCl and the sourness of citricacid were unaffected by cooling. The second experiment demonstratedthat the temperature of the tongue was the critical factor forproducing the effects on sweetness and bitterness. The latterfinding implies that some of the inconsistencies in the literatureon taste–temperature interactions might have been avoidedif the temperature of the tongue had been routinely controlled.In addition, the importance of lingual temperature suggeststhat thermal effects on taste intensity may often be due tochanges in the sensitivity of the gustatory transduction processrather than to changes in the molecular properties of the tastesolutions.     

'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor

Individual differences in taste perception have been explained in part by variations in peripheral innervation associated with the genetic ability to taste the bitter substances PTC and PROP. In the present study we report evidence of another source of individual differences that is independent of taste stimulus, taste quality, or gustatory nerve. Individuals who perceived taste from thermal stimulation alone (thermal taste) gave significantly higher taste ratings to chemical stimuli--often by a factor of >2:1--than did individuals who perceived no taste from thermal stimulation. This was true for all taste stimuli tested (sucrose, saccharin, sodium chloride, citric acid, quinine sulfate, MSG and PROP), for all three gustatory areas of the mouth (anterior tongue, posterior tongue and soft palate) and for whole-mouth stimulation. Moreover, the same individuals reported stronger sensations from the olfactory stimulus vanillin, particularly when it was sensed retronasally. The generality of the thermal-taster advantage and its extension to an olfactory stimulus suggests that it arises from individual differences in CNS processes that are involved in perception of both taste and flavor.     

Relationships among taste qualities assessed with response-context effects

Psychophysical judgments often depend on stimulus context. For example, sugar solutions are judged sweeter when a tasteless fruity aroma has been added. Response context also matters; adding a fruity aroma to sugar increases the rated sweetness when only sweetness is considered but not when fruitiness is judged as well. The interaction between stimulus context and response context has been explored more extensively in taste-odor mixtures than in taste-taste mixtures. To address this issue, subjects in the current study rated the sourness of citric acid mixed with quinine (bitter), sodium chloride (salty), and cyclamate (sweet) (stimulus context). In one condition, subjects rated sourness alone. In another, subjects rated both sourness and the other salient quality (bitterness, saltiness, or sweetness) (response context). Sourness ratings were most sensitive to response context for sour-salty mixtures (i.e., ratings of sourness alone exceeded ratings of sourness made simultaneously with saltiness) and least sensitive to context for the sour-sweet mixtures (sourness ratings made under the 2 conditions were essentially identical). Response-context effects for the sour-bitter mixture were nominally intermediate. The magnitudes of these context effects were related to judgments of qualitative similarity between citric acid and the other stimuli, consistent with prior findings. These types of context effects are relevant to the study of taste-taste mixture interactions and should provide insight into the perceptual similarities among the taste qualities.     

Genetic taste responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil among adults: a screening tool for epidemiological studies.

Genetically mediated taste responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) has been linked to reduced acceptance of some bitter foods. In this community-based study male (n = 364) and female (n = 378) adults enrolled in a self-help dietary intervention trial were screened for PROP taster status. Respondents, aged 18--70 years, were mailed filter papers impregnated with PROP or with aspartame solutions. They received instructions to rate taste intensity and hedonic preference using nine point category scales. Women rated PROP as more bitter than did men. Both sweetness and bitterness ratings were lower for older adults. Taste responsiveness to PROP was unrelated to body mass index in women or men. Higher bitterness ratings for PROP were weakly associated with higher sweetness ratings for aspartame, but were unrelated to sweet taste preferences. Successful administration of PROP filter papers by mail suggests new avenues for the screening of taste phenotypes in epidemiological studies.     

Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes

This study investigated the relationship between perception of an odour when smelled and the taste of a solution to which the odour is added as a flavorant. In Experiment 1 (E1) sweetness, sourness, liking and intensity ratings were obtained for 20 odours. Taste ratings were then obtained for sucrose solutions to which the odours had been added as flavorants. Certain odours were found to enhance tasted sweetness while others suppressed it. The degree to which an odour smelled sweet was the best predictor of the taste ratings. These findings were extended in Experiment 2 (E2), which included a second tastant, citric acid, and employed four odours from E1. The most sweet smelling odour, caramel, was found to suppress the sourness of citric acid and, as in E1, to enhance the sweetness of sucrose. Again, odours with low sweetness suppressed the sweetness of tasted sucrose. The study demonstrated that the effects of odours on taste perception are not limited to sweetness enhancement and apply to sour as well as sweet tastes. The overall pattern of results is consistent with an explanation of the taste properties of odours in terms of prior flavour-taste associations.     

Taste modifiers: parotid reflexes can differ from taste judgements

Sweetness-depressing gymnemic acid (G) and sweetness-inducingmiraculin (M) helped determine the extent to which parotid salivaryresponses match behavioral and neural gustatory responses. Parotidflow rates and tastes intensities were obtained from four subjectsfor four sweeteners (before and after G) and for citric acid(CA) before and after M and G. A mixture of 20 mM CA and 10%sucrose was also tested. Although G depressed sweetness forglucose, sucrose, fructose and aspartame, G generally failedto alter parotid responses or depress post-G ratings for bitterintensity. In fact, G markedly elevated parotid responses forthe acid–sucrose mixture. Residual sweetness after G,detected mainly from the posterior tongue, probably contributedonly partially to sustaining post–G parotid responses.We speculate that side tastes from the sweeteners and oral irritationfrom CA in the mixture contributed to elevated flow rates afterG. Sucrose- and M-induced sweetness generally elevated parotidresponses for 20 mM CA. This result agrees with human chordatympani responses after M but differs for sucrose–acidmixtures in that parotid responses approached the calculatedsum of the components. We speculate that non-gustatory inputsmay also affect sweet–sour responses and advise cautionin relating parotid reflexes only to taste judgements. ¹Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, San JoseState University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA     

Anterior Tongue Stiomulation with Amiloride Suppresses NaCl Saltiness, but not Citric Acid Sourness in Humans

Suppression of the saltiness of NaCI solutions by amiloride,a sodium channel blocker, has previously been reported a numberof times in humans. This suppression was seen with techniquesthat involved stimulation of small areas of the tongue. It wasnot certain, however, whether amiloride would suppress saltinesswith stimulation of a much larger area of the tongue; one publishedstudy, in fact, found negative results with whole mouth stimulation.For this study, eight subjects dipped a large part of the anteriorportion of the tongue into a 10-ml sample of NaCI solution,or a NaCI and amiloride solution, and reported its magnitudeof saltiness intensity. The results show that amiloride suppressedthe saltiness of NaCI when a large area of the anterior tonguewas stimulated. Consistent with previous studies, there wasindividual variability across subjects in this suppressive effectof amiloride. This study also used this method to test the effectsof amiloride on the sourness of citric acid, which was not expectedto be affected. No suppression of sourness was seen with amiloride.Chem. Senses 21: 113–120, 1996.     

Enhancement of sucrose sweetness with soluble starch in humans.

The effect of soluble starch (acid-modified starch) on taste intensity was investigated in human subjects. Different concentrations of sucrose (Suc), six sweeteners, NaCl, quinine-HCl (QHCl) and citric acid (Cit) were dissolved in either distilled water (DW; standard) or starch solution (test solution). The solutions were presented to naive subjects and each subject was requested to taste and compare the sweetness intensity between the standard and test solutions based on a scale ranging from +3 (enhanced) to -3 (inhibited). A greater sweetness intensity occurred with Suc at different concentration (0.1-1.0 M) dissolved in soluble starch (0.125% to 4.0%) than with Suc in DW. Similarly, five other different products of soluble starch at 0.25 and 4.0% resulted in enhancement of sweetness for 0.3 and 1.0 M Suc. With the sole exception of the taste of 0.3 M Suc, sweet enhancement did not occur with 0.43 M fructose, 0.82 M glucose, 0.82 M sorbitol, 0.0037 M aspartame, 0.0042 M saccharin-Na or 0.016 M cyclamate. Neither the saltiness of NaCl (0.01-0.3 M), the bitterness of QHCl (0.00003-0.001 M) nor the sourness of Cit (0.0003-0.01 M) were affected by the soluble starch. These results suggest that the taste enhancing effects of soluble starch on Suc sweetness might depend not only on the taste transduction mechanism, but also on the molecular interaction between Suc and soluble starch.     

A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR MONITORING INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCES IN TASTE SELECTION TESTS

The evaluation of panel performance was made by three methods: average of correct responses (A), comparison of distances of individual standardized judgments to the average standardized responses (D) and a principal components analysis (PCA). Thirty assessors identified water and basic tastes and discriminated different sweet stimuli in neutral or acidified vehicles using R‐index rating and ranking tests. By A and D methods 22 assessors were qualified as proficient. Composition of both panels was identical except for one judge. The output from PCA provided a graphical representation of the performance of the assessors and retained different subsets of 24–26 panelists for different proposals as discrimination of sweetness in acidified beverages, recognition of bitterness, sourness and discrimination of slight sweetness or evaluation of saltiness.     

Stimulation of bitterness by capsaicin and menthol: differences between lingual areas innervated by the glossopharyngeal and chorda tympani nerves

Capsaicin is viewed as a purely chemesthetic stimulus that selectively stimulates the somatosensory system. Here we show that when applied to small areas of the tongue, capsaicin can produce a bitter taste as well as sensory irritation. In experiment 1, individuals were screened for the ability to perceive bitterness from capsaicin on the circumvallate papillae. Fifteen of 25 subjects who reported at least weak bitterness rated the intensity of taste, irritation and coolness produced by 100-320 microM capsaicin and 100-320 mM menthol applied via cotton swabs to the tip (fungiform region), the posterior edge (foliate region), and the dorsal posterior surface (circumvallate region) of the tongue. Sucrose, citric acid, sodium chloride and quinine hydrochloride were applied to the same areas to assess tastes responsiveness. On average, capsaicin and menthol produced "moderate" bitterness (and no other significant taste qualities) in the circumvallate region, and weaker bitterness on the side and tip of the tongue. Sensory irritation from capsaicin was rated significantly higher at the tongue tip, whereas menthol coolness was rated higher in the circumvallate region. In experiment 2 we applied sucrose and quinine hydrochloride together with capsaicin to investigate the effects other taste stimuli might have on capsaicin's reported bitterness. As expected, adding quinine produced stronger bitterness in the circumvallate and fungiform regions, and adding sucrose significantly reduced the bitterness of capsaicin in the circumvallate region. Overall, the results suggest that capsaicin and menthol are capable of stimulating a subset of taste neurons that respond to bitter substances, perhaps via receptor-gated ion channels like those recently found in capsaicin- and menthol-sensitive trigeminal ganglion neurons, and that the glossopharyngeal nerve may contain more such neurons than the chorda tympani nerve. That some people fail to perceive bitterness from capsaicin further implies that the incidence of capsaicin-sensitive taste neurons varies across people as well as between gustatory nerves.     

Sensory integration in citric acid/sucrose mixtures

The scale values of perceived sweetness, sourness and totaltaste intensity of unmixed sucrose, unmixed citric acid andseveral citric acid/sucrose mixtures were assessed, using afunctional measurement approach in combination with a two-stimulusprocedure. The data showed that the scale values obtained werelinear with perceived taste intensity. It was demonstrated thatcitric acid suppresses the sweetness of sucrose and that, inversely,sucrose suppresses the sourness of citric acid. However, thissuppressive effect was not symmetrical in the range of concentrationsused. While the degree of sweetness suppression depended onlyon the citric acid level, the degree of sourness suppressiondepended on the sucrose as well as on the citric acid concentration.With regard to the perceived total taste intensity of citricacid/sucrose mixtures, it was shown that the sum of sweetnessand sourness approximately equals the total taste intensity.The implications of the present findings for the analytic—syntheticcontroversy and for taste interaction theories are discussed.     

Differential sensitivity of tongue areas and palate to electrical stimulation: a suprathreshold cross-modal matching study

A cross-modal matching procedure was used, in twelve subjects,to evaluate regional differences in suprathreshold sensitivityof the oral cavity to electrogustometric stimulation. Stimulationof five loci on each side of the oral cavity was performed:tongue tip (one cm from the midline), anterior tongue side (2.5cm from tip on lateral margin), posterior tongue side (regionof the foliate papillae), posterior medial tongue (one cm frommidline on circumvallate papillae), and soft palate (one cmfrom midline, one cm above superior pole of anterior palatinearch). The tip of the tongue was significantly more sensitivethan the other areas to electric stimulation, as evidenced bythe slope and absolute position of the psychophysical powerfunctions. Strong correlations were observed in the sensitivitymeasures across tongue loci and between tongue and palate sides.No effects of subject gender or mouth side were found.     

Kinetics of tongue projection in Ambystoma tigrinum: Quantitative kinematics,muscle function,and evolutionary hypotheses

The projectile tongue of caudate amphibians has been studied from many perspectives, yet a quantitative kinetic model of tongue function has not yet been presented for generalized (nonplethodontid) terrestrial salamanders. The purposes of this paper are to describe quantitatively the kinnematics of the feeding mechanism and to present a kinetic model for the function of the tongue in the ambystomatid salamander Ambystoma tigrinum. Six kinematic variables were quantified from high-speed films of adult A. tigrinum feeding on land and in the water. Tongue protrusion reaches its maximum during peak gape, while peak tongue height is reached earlier, 15 ms after the mouth starts to open. Tongue kinematics change considerably during feeding in the water, and the tongue is not protruded past the plane of the gape. Electrical stimulation of the major tongue muscles showed that tongue projection in A. tigrinum is the combined result of activity in four muscles: the geniohyoideus, Subarcualis rectus 1, intermandibularis posterior, and interhyoideus. Stimulation of the Subarcualis rectus 1 alone does not cause tongue projection. The kinetic model produced from the kinematic and stimulation data involves both a dorsal vector (the resultant of the Subarcualis rectus 1, intermandibularis posterior, and interhyoideus) and a ventral vector (the geniohyoideus muscle), which sum to produce a resultant anterior vector that directs tongue motion out of the mouth and toward the prey. This model generates numerous testable predictions about tongue function and provides a mechanistic basis for the hypothesis that tongue projection in salamanders evolved from primitive intraoral manipulative action of the hyobranchial apparatus.     

Taste suppression following lingual capsaicin pre-treatment in humans

The effect of oral capsaicin on taste sensations in humans was reinvestigated with attention to methodological issues raised in previous studies, including the mode of presentation and temperature of the tastant stimulus, as well as the sensitizing and desensitizing properties of capsaicin. One-half of the dorsal anterior tongue was pre-treated with capsaicin, followed by bilateral tastant application (sucrose, NaCl, quinine, monosodium glutamate and citric acid). Subjects indicated on which side the taste intensity was greater in a two-alternative, forced-choice procedure and also rated taste intensity independently on each side of the tongue. Each of the five tastants was tested sequentially, with reapplication of capsaicin between trials in order to maintain a constant level of burn. Four experiments were conducted: (i) a high concentration (33 p.p.m.) (109 microM) capsaicin effect on taste intensity elicited by high tastant concentrations; (ii) a high concentration capsaicin effect on taste intensity elicited by low tastant concentrations; (iii) a low concentration (1.5 p.p.m.) (4.9 microM) capsaicin effect on taste intensity elicited by low tastant concentrations; and (iv) validation of the method for localizing taste by pre-treating one side of the tongue with Gymnema sylvestre, followed by bilateral application of sucrose. In the first experiment, a significant proportion of the subjects chose the non-treated side in the two-alternative, forced-choice procedure and assigned significantly higher ratings to that side for sucrose-induced sweetness, quinine-induced bitterness and glutamate-induced umami sensations. Salty and sour sensations were not different between sides. A 15 min break was imposed in order to allow the capsaicin burn to disappear and desensitization to set in, followed by reapplication of the tastant test solutions. There were no bilateral differences in the intensity of the sensations elicited by any of the five tastants. Similar results were obtained in experiments 2 and 3. In the fourth experiment, all 15 subjects tested chose the side not treated with Gymnema sylvestre as having a stronger sweet taste and assigned significantly higher ratings to that side, thereby validating the method for taste localization. These results indicate that oral capsaicin reduces certain but not all taste sensations and are discussed in terms of possible physiological and cognitive interactions.     

An assessment of binary mixture interactions for nine sweeteners

Binary mixtures of acesulfame K, aspartame, sodium cyclamate,fructose, glucose, stevioside, sodium saccharin, sucrose andxylitol were assessed using factorial mixture designs. A simpleadditive model was used to generate predictions for the sweetnessof the mixtures and these predicted responses were comparedto the observed sweetness ratings of the mixtures. It was foundthat the mixtures tended to exhibit superadditivity at low concentrations,additivity at intermediate concentrations and subadditivityat high concentrations. Synergistic and suppressive effectsin the mixtures were evaluated by comparing mixture responsesto the sweetness ratings of ‘self-mixtures’. Self-mixturedata were generated by treating a mixture of a substance withitself as if it were a mixture of two different substances.Synergism was defined as a mixture response that was greaterthan the sweetness of the component self-mixtures, and suppressionwas defined as a mixture response that was less than the sweetnessof the component self-mixtures. Of the 31 binary mixtures studied,18 showed synergism, two showed suppression and 11 did not differsignificantly from their components. It is hypothesized thatmultiple sweetness receptors or release from bitter suppressionmay account for the synergistic effects.     

Perceptual Properties of Benzoic Acid Derivatives

Sensory properties of equimolar concentrations of benzoic acidderivatives were examined using time-intensity procedures. Significantdifferences in maximum intensities (P < 0.005) were foundfor astringency, bitterness, prickling, sourness and sweetness.Although these compounds differed only in the number and positionof the hydroxy groups, they exhibited quite different profiles.Gentisic acid had the highest sourness and bitterness maximumintensity, salicylic and gentisic acids were highest in astringency,and m-hydroxybenzoic acid was the sweetest sample. Benzoic acidhad the highest intensity of prickling feeling which lasted20 s longer than salicylic acid and 40 s longer than the othersamples which elicited lowest intensity of prickling sensation.Chem. Senses 20: 393–400, 1995.     

Taste profiles from single circumvallate papillae: comparison with fungiform profiles

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the psychophysicalresponse characteristics of single circumvallate papillae. InExperiment 1, 12 circumvallate papillae in four subjects werechemically stimulated to assess identification of taste qualities.Single circumvallate papillae were found to mediate multipletaste qualities, and the taste profiles obtained from differentpapillae were similar within the same subject. Moreover, sucrose,quinine monohydrochloride and citric acid elicited unitary andcharacteristic quality responding in these papillae from allsubjects, whereas NaCl elicited predominantly sour and/or bitterresponses from three of the four subjects. Experiment 2 directly compared responses obtained from singlecircumvallate papillae with those obtained from fungiform regionsof the tongue. Data for 10 subjects showed significantly greatersour responses to citric acid and NaCl in circumvallate papillaeand significantly greater salty responses to these compoundson the anterior tongue. In addition, the taste profiles forcitric acid and NaCl were distinct for circumvallate papillae,while those from the anterior tongue were similar. These datasuggest that the bitterness and sweetness of quinine and sugar,respectively, can be identified on the basis of sensory informationarising from either circumvallate or fungiform regions, butthat differentiation of the tastes of salts and acids may dependon a comparison of the input from both regions and/or additionalinformation arising from foliate regions.     

Effects of gymnemic acid concentration and time since exposure on intensity of simple tastes: A test of the biphasic model for the action of gymnemic acid

At several intervals following exposure to gymnemic acid, subjectsjudged the sweetness, bitterness, saltiness, and sourness ofsimple taste stimuli. The experiment was expressly designedto test Kennedy and Halpern's (1980) biphasic model for theaction of gymnemic acid. The model predicts selective suppressionof sweet taste immediately following exposure to gymnemic acidbut nonselective disruption of tastes with the passage of time.The data show dramatic reductions in sweet taste which recoverwith time but no reductions in bitterness, saltiness, or sournessat any time following exposure to any of a wide range of gymnemicacid concentrations.